Subject: “Cotytto”
By now, it has to be at the top of O’Reilly’s taboo subject list, where if a guest says the word, it’s not only blocked out, but they’re probably tossed out of the studio on their head, and never allowed to return. There can be no bigger taboo to Fox News than the true message of Christ. You see, the Baptism-Cotytto connection is rational enough that the average person is going to understand it.
According to Juvenal, e.g., Cotytto’s watering ritual “Baptae” priests actually had anal sex (“pathici” in Latin). And, today’s Church condemns the innocent gay community more in sexual controversy than any other. So, the whole thing is very laughable against today's Church. God is very cool.
Cotytto was the deity of promiscuous sex. The very last thing today’s “Christian” community would want to connect its number one sacrament with.
12-31-09
Polyamory:
How many think “I” ought to just join one of those polyamorous groups, and leave today’s Church alone? Forget it, I’m working hard for God.
Among other things, in Bible.com’s automated email response it states:
He [God] will never forsake those who call on Him in truth.
Yeah, but I bet they will.
What is “dishonest prostitution”?
Hookers, call girls, etc. are at least honest with their clients about what’s really going on; but what’s really going on by today’s church standards: “We don't really wanna take you to dinner, at some fancy restaurant. The only reason we do, is 'cause we know it leads to, the one thing that we all want.” –Tracy Byrd, 2003.
And, “It don't matter what line we hand you, when we come a-crawlin' in. We ain't wrong; we ain't sorry. An' it's probably gonna happen again.”
Yeah, I don’t think many churches are going to want to sing that song. “Lies: all LIES!” –Frau Farbissina, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me, 1999.
Gospel of Thomas, 105:
Jesus said, “Whoever knows the father and the mother will be called the child of a whore.”
Jesus says marriage makes your mother a whore. Don’t bust your hand through your screen to grab my neck: Jesus is one who said it.
Down in the polls:
O’Reilly says that Obama is losing his constituency because he’s not moving to the center quick enough. His constituency says he’s losing his constituency because he’s moving from the far left towards the center. Obama’s going to believe O’Reilly. Guess what? “I’m” the guy that everyone wanted to be President in the last election: “I’m” the guy who would bring the change that Obama’s former constituency (the majority) wants. And, probably no one else could do it but me.
All my logic fits with reality, and all my Christian truths fit with real hidden facts. The only thing in the way in all the idiots out there who think they already know it all. But, that’s a huge mountain to pass. Technically “impossible.” Anyone is the past smart enough that thought about attempting what I’m doing, didn’t because they weren’t “crazy” like me. You see, only a “crazy” person can apparently work for God. Everyone else is “sane” enough to know to put God second and themselves first. Well, I’ll have to admit that I’ll be able to say on my deathbed that I did do something that no one has ever done before. I really don’t personally care that much if people heed and follow my advice or not. God cares a lot, but I don’t (that much). Still, I know who’s likely to rule for eternity in the Kingdom of Heaven.
“So, round 'n' round 'n' round we go – where the world's headed, nobody knows. Just a Ball of Confusion. Oh yea, that's what the world is today. … And the band played on.” –The Temptations, 1970.
Going Rogue – (book) by Sarah Palin:
http://www.answers.com/topic/rogue, “rogue”:
“An unprincipled, deceitful, and unreliable person; a scoundrel or rascal.”
Am I missing something there? That “unreliable” sure describes her past job as governor of Alaska. So, it should read “Is Already Rogue.” Yeah, this does sound like a kind of different way to think outside the box. I’ve got to be missing something. This is too easy. I don’t know if I like commenting on things this easy.
How about an alternative source:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Going+Rogue, “Going Rogue”:
“A euphemism for unprotected anal sex.”
Well, I know that that was the incredible fact of what baptism represented in the Jesus-era classical Gentile world, especially in the areas where Paul mostly preached, but it doesn’t really describe today’s Republican Party.
The book’s front flap says: “As chief executive of America’s largest state ….” Because the map painted a different picture, when I was a little kid, I believe it was my older brother, who corrected me telling me that references to the size of a state wasn’t determined by area but by population. Well… me informing everyone about the “unprincipled, deceitful, and unreliable” spin of Sarah Palin and her cronies is really something you all already know. Well, I don’t know, it goes on saying: “Supporters called her ‘refreshing’ and ‘honest’ ….” Sorry, but what makes most sense is that this is a country full of nothing but liars, who are all so dumb, that we all think we’re honest. That’s especially truth with today’s church. Well, it makes sense that the most recognized for being the most honest in such a country would be the least honest.
“Cotytto”:
It’s hard to spin when someone knows the basic facts.
Cotytto was the deity of open sex, but according to Juvenal, e.g., her watering ritual Baptae priests actually had anal sex (“pathici” in Latin). And, today’s church condemns the gay community more in sexual controversy than any other. So, the whole thing is very laughable against today’s church. God is very cool. Oh, today’s church also condemns the poor community by condemning early abortions.
Jesus actually stated that the later Antichrist was His own later church, in Matthew 7:21-23.
I mean, it shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to see that today’s church is basically the opposite of Jesus, as Jesus fought hard for the rights of the poor while He actually condemned pretty much all rich people; while today’s mainstream (influencing) church is by far favorable to the rich conservatives. So, I say while they’re there, now’s the right time to hit them with the truth. Oh sure, guys like O’Reilly will give a little to the poor, but will use their influence against the poor a thousand fold. It’s the same trick today’s churches use to fool the vast majority. The degree of stupidity of the average person has been fully assessed by the Protestant Church, and they have now optimized what brings in the most income. Well, it’s been going down since the pill. Again, selfish pride in not admitting error, even overruling selfish greed. With my findings, God has set them up for a major fall (fall of the corruption only); all I have to find is someone of influence who’s smart enough to see what’s now right in from of their face. And, as insulting I am to everyone’s selfish pride, it may be a while. (They’d purposely ignore it all just to spite me.) But, someday I’ll be dead; then they can acknowledge it, and I will live on as the most beneficial person for the betterment of society who has ever lived (because I didn’t pull any punches).
I think most atheists stem from something they just personally don’t like about the Bible:
Or, they have been taught to be an atheist from someone who became an atheist for the above reason. The others are just trying to impress how they’re “smart” by saying that since there’s no conclusive proof of God, like a big heavy voice coming out of Heaven, then that’s proof there’s no God. All that proves is that parts of the Bible are aggrandized. Jesus told that people would not believe unless they saw miracles. I think the miracles were hallucinations placed by God, to eventually make Jesus the most popular person who has ever lived (as Christianity today is the largest world religion), just so I could find the circumvented truths about His sexual teachings and most importantly His Goldenrule Judgment (corrupted by “faith alone”), simply because I’m the only one who has ever had the rational answers to all avoidable world problems. And, again, since I’m a “nobody,” I have to have support from a “somebody,” and Jesus is the biggest “somebody” ever, because God knows that the human mind is far too dumb to understand logic over idolatry.
God doesn’t like creating hallucinations in one’s mind, because a hallucination is a lie of reality, and reality is what is really making the world go around, and the entire purpose of our existence is for us dealing with and manipulating reality. Else there is nothing new or progressive. God will cause hallucinations just so the people will follow Jesus and make Jesus into an idol; but, how I differ is that my analysis is entirely based on reality, with absolutely no guidance from the supernatural, and the best way to fix problems and progress in reality is by dealing in reality 100%. You see, miracles just cause too many people to want to quit working reality asking God to “just give” them everything they want. There’s nothing new being created there. It’s like of like how alcohol works. I provide absolutely no miracles, just 100% logic. But, I need the most popular person who has ever lived to give me a jump start.
Many “smart” people “prove” to others how smart they are by like telling God to communicate to us right now through the clouds. See, that “proves” they are “smart” and that all of us believers are “dumb.” Right? And, of course, I have to be the “dumbest” for suggesting we should quit supporting a country that thinks it needs to worship a wall. Right? Especially one that’s the base cause of all our terrorist problems, and that’s likely going to cause WWIII. I’ll just keep repeating: “I’m the dumb one, everyone else is smart. I’m the dumb one, everyone else is smart. ….”
“The Garden of Earthly Delights” c. 1500:
Better not be hurtin’ any defenseless animals out there.
When I’m monogamous, I:
…give them all my love, time, understanding, compassion, forgiveness, non-judgment, and attention to the one. Of course, this is necessary so I pay the child support.
The marriage vows actually say “forsaking all others.” How much more contradictive can one be against Jesus’ “love one another”?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification, “Sexual objectification”:
Sexual objectification refers to the practice of regarding or treating another person merely as an instrument (object) towards the person's sexual pleasure. Objectification refers to the use of the body of a sex partner for sexual purposes, with insufficient regard for their personality.
I know we’ve been taught the opposite; but, if everyone desired one another as much as men desire women, then it’d be a much better world. Sex is the only way. If people can be looked at as an “object” of sexual desire, then we wouldn’t have to first like them otherwise to like them. Today’s phony Church love is just leading us all to the eventual direction of WWIII, as desire for the “object” is suppressed creating apathy. E.g., if we have to first like the “personality” of everyone in Iran to keep us from bombing them, it isn’t going to happen.
Open sex will create a concrete, tangible and real desire and satisfaction that will much lessen problems escalated in today’s chain of reaction.
How really, really dumb and stupid is everyone?
I’m getting tired of hearing about how Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons on his own people: It’s the same as saying Abraham Lincoln murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people who lived in the southern states. I don’t support either, but really, really dumb and stupid is when everyone doesn’t realize that we’re all the same kind of evil. And, I’ve got a hint for you: Really, really dumb and stupid should not be what’s controlling the decisions of this country. But it is – it really, really is. And, selfish pride is not going to allow it to be changed.
If you’re a warmonger like Hannity or O’Reilly, and you really, really want to kill a terrorist, you can by killing yourself.
People should appreciate my work for the last eight years (culminating to my current website):
Back in 2002, I was running into so many valid findings at the library in further support of my 6-9-99 letter, that a major generic post-9/11 writing of mine never got released (started October, 2001). It was file titled “80cents” (relating to a postage refund issue) and had some great logic and alternatives why we shouldn’t invade Iraq. Since lots of my past anti-war writings seemed to have gotten attention, possibly the 2002 open-sex findings enthused so much of my time, that it allowed the Iraq invasion (by disallowing me to finish 80cents). I even noticed when I paid my credit card bill coincidentally on the anniversary date of 9-11-02, that the balance due was $911.82. That’s an exact 80 cents difference to that day’s date. See scanned statement:
This told me that I needed to get it released, but it was in a state of several add-on paper notes and the longer something is, the longer it takes to re-read and edit it correctly. Plus, I was still discovering more open-sex findings at that time. Still to date, I haven’t had the time to try to re-read it with all the added paper notes, to try to put in together the way that I would have back in 2002. I think lots of its more important points got written in my 2006 Mr. Critical writings, but, of course, it was too late. My latest advice with Iran is there’s really no reason why they can’t become another India, but American selfish “pride” of the 1979 hostage situation (where no one got killed) prevents it. Again, don’t underestimate the sole powerful influence of pride in saving face. If we keep threatening / terrorizing Iran with military strikes, sanctions, etc. Iran may eventually start the war. Therefore, again, my advice is to treat them like an equal. Of course, Israel is the main thorn in everyone’s side, that’s likely been the root cause of all our Muslim problems. And, since the Jews don’t “practice” fairness or the Goldenrule, we should tell them that they’re on their own: that we will not militarily support them any longer. Likely Obama feels this way, but won’t actually say it. If I was President, I’d say it.
My 11-11-09 economic advice is so perfect that we can even pay back China with just printed up money:
I don’t believe it, but even if China is the country that continuously gives us further loans for our increasing national debt, which we never seem to be paying back, we can even print up free money to pay them back; because, that money means that they can line up and load up their ships at American ports. Right? Well, what would that do to the U.S. economy? It would create “jobs.” Right? Even if we don’t owe China a cent, just giving them the trillions of dollars would still achieve the same result. Better than our current tax to the bone plan, anyway.
Polyamories with Ph.D’s:
See, everyone seems happy there. And moreover, because this picture was taken 100 years ago, you know, when no one smiled in pictures.
I don’t know if this polyamory is for me. I kind of like being by myself most of the time, where the sex drives over here once or twice a week. And, maybe one of those wild and crazy multipartner wingdings (WCMW), say, once a month.
Okay, okay, I drive to their places a lot also.
My exciting life:
Look, he's crawling up my wall
Black and hairy, very small
Now he's up above my head
Hanging by a little thread
…
Now he's dropped on to the floor
Heading for the bedroom door
Maybe he's as scared as me
Where's he gone now, I can't see
…
There he is wrapped in a ball
Doesn't seem to move at all
Perhaps he's dead, I'll just make sure
Pick this book up off the floor
…
He's come to a sticky end
Don't think he will ever mend
Never more will he crawl 'round
He's embedded in the ground
You say, “Cobwebs and strange.”
Mind control:
I can control your mind right now by saying: “I found my thrills.” Now, that I’ve got you all singing the rest of that song, try to find that hill with God’s free food. If you can, see if there is any free love there also. Well, give it a hundred years or so first.
http://elpasoinc.com/readArticleNYT.aspx?guid=c0ca3bff-26e3-0be5-29eb-1b804b32cf8e, Report Uncovers No Voting Fraud by Acorn:
The report also stated that two conservative activists might have broken privacy laws in California and Maryland by posing as a prostitute and pimp while secretly videotaping Acorn staff members who gave them advice on evading taxes and hiding their activities. The two states “appear to ban” the recording of face-to-face conversations without the consent of all participants, the report said.
I think something logical must have got to ‘em, like a 7-Eleven clerk.
I went to church:
It’d been a few years, so I needed to rehash some reality of unreality. The cop-out was the one about how God’s forgiveness compared with the secular judge who pays the speeder’s fine. The pastor was sincerely saying it like it was so good, so fitting and rational. And, of course the sanctuary was filled with people. Should I really need to explain that a judge who always pays a speeder’s fine would just cause the speeder to keep speeding, making the roads more dangerous for others? “Possibly,” the speeder may become shocked and initially decide to endeavor to stop speeding, but when he’s running late to something important, well, all the rest of us had better get out of his way. Sure, they had lots of cans of food for the poor stacked in the lobby, where the “judge” statement totally overruled the ethical premise. This just reassures me of my position that no matter what you or anyone else may be working on right now to try to improve the world – and it may be “a” good thing – doesn’t even come close to the importance of my mission. With today’s church being the top ethical guidance in this country, it makes total sense to me why there is so much dishonesty in the business world, media and government. In other words, yes, duh, churches will certainly say its okay for their congregants to be good; but, and will state that God forgives all their wrongs, for those who want to be bad. (That’s the key to the trick.) Therefore, let’s all try to fool God that we’re good since Jesus said to be, but “thank you God” for forgiving us when we “stumble” (lie, cheat and steal whenever it’s to our advantage). I mean the allowance to “stumble” pays in additional profits enough to pay probably 1% towards cans brought to church. Actually less than 1% would relax the conscience of the hell-bound mind. It’s like they lie, cheat and steal “only” when it’s to their advantage. Most of the time they’re totally honest and fair. I’m convinced that I’m the only person who has this real “major” problem figured out. None of you can see it (church cop-outs) as a problem, and there is no way you will think different until someone of influence tells you. And then at that point, you will believe it all until someone else influential tells you something different. “Dumb” is the real battle I’m fighting. And, all of you disagree with me. People tell me I’m going to catch more flies with honey, but I won’t simply because I’m not a person of high influence. Because, a person of high influence has to tell the “money” want it wants. And, that’s where the problem lies. So, laying it on the line is my only way. The “full” truth of the matter is my failing attempt. But, really, trying to get people to understand first base is a challenge. We live in a world where everyone is 100% for themselves; then in extremely bias pride for (1) family, then (2) town or school, then (3) country. If aliens from space attacked us right now, we’d all get our nukes together for the battle, and be damn glad to find that Iran and Syria had some more hidden that we hadn’t previously known about.
The reason why people…:
(1) Trust the rationale of church cop-outs. Reason: “dumb.”
(2) Trust they’re on the right side in war. Reason “dumb.”
(3) Trust that meat is better to eat then fruits and vegetables. Reason “dumb.”
(4) Trust that no one will work if they get their basic needs met from the government. Reason “dumb.” (Anyone making over $20,000 proves that wrong.)
(5) Trust that sexual desire is only for the pleasures of the man, and is evil even in that. Reason “dumb.” (Well, this is the one that has been progressively changing since the pill, but is also causing more and more to forsake religion.)
And, I could probably figure out how to make a better toaster, given the time.
So, let’s see you all pay me a handsome tithe instead of to your church, so I can hire a staff to advance “intelligence.” There’s a reason you’re not going to do that: “dumb.” – Simply no better or more accurate way to say it. Any other word would just be MORE bootlick (to the conservatives) further just justifying all the (solvable) wrongs in the entire world. And there are a lot of left-wing conservatives from my point of view. In fact, people’s minds on the left are more irrational than those on the right, because the law of averages tells that dumber people fall victim much more often, and therefore know something’s wrong, but, again, don’t have the aptitude to know what I know; and, some of the smarter ones on the right may have the aptitude (not O’Reilly), but serve themselves better by backing the evil. I’m apparently the only living person who has both the aptitude and the honesty (to know to not worship a wall, and the gall to say it, e.g.). Everyone’s selfish: Both conservatives and liberals only care about themselves; but, if Cotytto was the goddess of marriage, with her priests’ strong connection to Baptism, and I exposed it, then today’s church would be having it all over the news. But, the gay and polyamory communities tell me they’re just not going to have anything to do with Christianity (see reason for atheism stated above). And the few who are “Christian” use the “faith alone” cop-outs, therefore, don’t need my valid proof, because simply “anything goes.” (“Faith alone” is a very bad thing to justify the LGBT or polyamory, because it also allows real sin: lying, cheating, stealing, etc. Valid proof that Jesus allowed / commanded promiscuous sex, and assured Fair Afterlife Punishment is the only workable truth.) So, I have to make everything longer by explaining how “Christians” traditionally erroneously teach that anyone who has ever sex out of monogamous and heterosexual marriage is going to be tortured in Hell for eternity (ignoring Matt. 25:34-36); and that Christian concealment of my information is what’s causing the hate crimes, the hampering of fair gay legislation, the prevention of finding STD/HIV cures, etc., as those think they do God service. Everyone involved in LGBT and polyamory would be better off if my findings where made public, yet stalemate (so far).
It really looks like everyone would just have to bow down to me in blind faith for anything to be able to work; but, the Book of Revelation correctly says for people to not do that. So, a catch-22 even if I was popular. I don’t see it (solutions) happening; but, prophecy says it will.
Failed bombing of Northwest Airlines Flight 253:
I can’t help but think that if Obama would have instead made a friendship with the Taliban and al-Qaeda like I suggested when he won the election, when he had the opportunity, then al-Qaeda wouldn’t now be trying to kill us. It was such a timely mistake that a future new President would even have more difficulty trying to do the intelligent thing.
Of course, we likely wouldn’t have any Muslim problems if the Jews didn’t think that “where” one worships God is so much more important than “how” one worships God. (I’m just one genius statement after the other, and no one’s getting it.)
The church’s sex lies about Christ supports terrorism:
The use of body scanning at airports, which shows body images underneath the clothing, are hampered by the “violation” of exposure to the private areas. Therefore, increasing the risk of a terrorist bomb getting on an airplane. Of course, American’s have died in Iraq because we don’t fully search Iraqi women. So, it’s nothing new. Saving face for dishonest church authorities is priority. Or, is it that “dumb” is the priority? I only criticize solvable problems in the world. But, if I worked at an airport, I’ll signify to the woman that her stuff looks pretty nice.
To better clarify how I differ from the existing stereotypes, I’ve added my stance to this chart:
http://acme.com/jef/religion_sex/, Religion and Sexual Ethics:
This chart appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle in December 1994. It was compiled, according to them, "based on official reports and expert advice."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAPTIST |
BUDDHIST |
CATHOLIC |
METHODIST |
MORMON |
MUSLIM |
JEWISH |
GOLDENRULE |
|
TEENAGE SEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREMARITAL SEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXTRAMARITAL SEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVORCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MASTURBATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABORTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACEPTIVES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARRIED CLERGY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEMALE CLERGY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOMOSEXUAL SEX ACTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAME-SEX BLESSINGS IN CHURCH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORDINATION OF HOMOSEXUALS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course the variation of the others on the chart also shows that none have it together, but surely each think they do. Mine’s the only one that battles pain and suffering (strives for all happy faces and less frowns), and is entirely based on the “intelligence” of not hurting the innocent (one who has not hurt an innocent person). If the chart added in judgments and punishments of those who do hurt innocent people, then I’d certainly utilize some “morally unacceptable in most cases” and “condemned” emblems. By the way, appropriately my logic in “EXTRAMARITAL SEX” and “DIVORCE” parallels Jesus’ teaching of the same. And, all my “Blessed” entries match Jesus, since “agape” included “sexual” love in John 13:34 (see my Septuagint pages). Today’s hell-bound church leaders have done a great job getting the dictionaries to say it doesn’t include sex, but it always and forever will in the very relevant Jesus-era Septuagint.
The usual “victim” in EXTRAMARITAL SEX and DIVORCE is the person’s spouse relying on and trusting the sinner, in accordance with the status quo and the marriage agreement. You see, the Goldenrule (trust in any agreement, mainly regarding to not DIVORCE) has precedence over open-sex. Also in an extremely brainwashed society, adultery can devastate a trusting spouse and family. If open-sex was the standard, and the government gave everyone their God given basic needs, then there’d basically be no victim in EXTRAMARITAL SEX and DIVORCE, as marriage agreements would be unnecessary. There’d still be people sharing rent, for example, where not paying one’s agreed part would still be a sin.
No one knows the name of this decade, or even the next one:
This decade is correctly called the “zeros” because every starting number of last two start with a zero: 2000, 2001 … 2009, all being subsets of the decade beginning “00s.” It should not be called like the “zeros’s” applying the plural of the two zeros, then adding another plural of the remaining subsets. You can call it the “zeroes” if you don’t like being pithy (as MANY newspapers and magazines do to fill up empty space). It doesn’t sound right because everyone is so stupid that no one has referred to it as such yet. If people start saying it a lot, then it wouldn’t sound so strange and ambiguous. They had the same problem in the first decade of the 1900s. And, saying “the double zeroes” ain’t rite neither (unless you’re a smart newspaper or magazine and want to confuse it even more). In text, it should be written as “the 00s” or “the 00’s” as “the 2000s” sounds like it’s talking about the entire millennium – unless it’s in a series, e.g.: 2000s, 2010s, 2020s, etc. Most people will call it “the 2000s… I mean the first decade of the 2000s.” Newspapers and magazine should like that one. The next decade will be called the “tens” (the 10’s), then the “twenties” (20’s) and so on.
Of course, last year was “O-eight.” This year is “O-nine.” Therefore, next year should be called “O-10.” Right? That’s like when I used to say: “Back in 19…2003.”
Who ya’ gonna call?
See, I got you singing again.
Anonymous:
I’m turning down even more video and audio interview offers because I don’t think it well to give out my identity. One woman (a sex therapist) even offered to have sex with me if I would tell her my name. But, there are several reasons why I don’t think it best to disclose my identity. The main reason is because people shouldn’t judge my findings and commentary by how great of personality I have. A great personality is not my forte. My forte is in deep research and deep commentary. I realize that if I divulged my personal name, it would be fighting the issues more in your face; but, the world needs to learn to be able to judge the facts based on the facts, not dependent on the personality or assertiveness of the finder. I mess up my words too much and experience certain memory loss when I’m nervous in tense oral discussion. You could refer to me as a very shy person when it comes to anything other than written dissertation. Writing allows me the more time I need to sort out my words and thoughts. I refer to myself as slow but accurate. Since this is an extremely emotional based society where personality and “who they are” decides who becomes President, not giving out my name might very well be the reason the incredible truth at my website fails. And, there are about nine other reasons I’ve personally noted why I keep my identity private. I’m not trying to hide anything illegal.
O’Reilly is a great example of a great personality with great knowledge and education. Therefore, everyone assumes that he can equally think outside the box. But, guys like O’Reilly are definitely proving to me that the more educated someone is, the less they can think beyond education (beyond established facts, including all the mistakes and BS). O’Reilly should just be doing a great job reading the news and telling us all the existing facts about a story, and not speculate into the future / the unknown. His guests are always making him look like an idiot on outside the box issues. “Traditional,” “established,” “conventional,” “habitual,” “recognized,” “conservative,” “customary” issues can be his only forte. Unique, superior solutions to difficult problems are contrary to his aptitude. Yet, no one even has the slightest notion that since his oral skills and historic facts are at the top, how it is even possible for him to lack in aptitudes beyond monkey see, monkey do. Of course, since the better personalities end up conservatives, conservatism is O’Reilly’s forte. And, there definitely are conservative Democrats. The “game” is priority in politics, and when the people pressure for more fairness, one side has to be the one who echoes it, and the other side has to be the one against it (or, the one side that benefits the most from unfairness). The Republicans have such a good stance because people think that it’s the executives who make the factories work; but, it’s really the lesser paid workers who actually make the products. Since the executives have a much, much bigger voice, the general public will actually believe that none of the workers would know how to make the products, and therefore America wouldn’t work without the executives. America works better than other countries only because production goes up the more slavery goes down. And America has made a big point about slavery. That means since employees are allowed to walk off the job, the executives “have to” pay them “more.” And, a higher paid employee is a much more efficient and productive employee. The natural emotion is to pay the employees the least amount. But, employees apparently know how to be less productive when they know they’re being treated unfair. Other countries that have less, work everyone at slave wages, keep them poor, so they will never find it advantageous to “walk out” of a job; making enthusiasm null, therefore less gets accomplished. I say: pay all Americans who don’t want to work just because they are poor, for their basic needs, then they will be much more enthused about getting a job for “more” and will find more enthusiasm in doing the job better; proved by America’s higher wages success story. We apparently just got lucky because of the civil war; but, we still believe that paying the least gets the most.
O’Reilly is just an example of just about everyone in control of the media, religion and the government. The higher one can get to the top, likely the better the personality and knowledge of existing facts, therefore the less the ability to think independently. Guys like Ted Kennedy maybe had the right heart but lacked in the ability to reckon-out full correct solutions.
The latest health care proposal:
Without having to repeat my earlier logic, I think Obama only cares about just getting “something” passed, to show the Clintons that he accomplished what they didn’t. But, I agree with the Republicans that it isn’t going to work; so, Obama needs to realize that now, because what he thinks is going to give him points today is just going to backfire on him big time in the future. Of course, he could be planning it that way, so to later say that since it’s so messed up, he’ll have to implement an all government program.
What’s basically going to happen is uninsured people are going to just walk into insurance companies and tell them that the doctor told them they have cancer, so they now need them to pay for it. I mean, I think God is blocking Obama people’s intelligence just so “I” will be the only one with brains, so to cause an eventual following of my very unique Godly logic and findings. Then what’s going to happen is insurance companies are still going to tell those people to go to hell, and instead just face whatever dumb penalties. It’s really laughable.
I just read that medical studies have found that women who swallow become less depressed. I understand why this kind of study isn’t going to be publicly known. Not being an expert, my guess is that since semen seems to tantalize the genital areas so much, as the fact that there’s no libido when the semen is emptied, possibly there’s something in it that makes the consumption of it please the rest of our body. Maybe semen can be like Huey Lewis’s new drug that doesn’t cause any kind of other problems, like how the sex act is one of the healthiest things one can achieve that has no ill effects (except for the social problems). There are some valid documents stating how specific Christian sects consumed it for the eucharist. See at my website: “orgies (overview),” “Epiphanius,” “Dead Sea Scrolls,” “Libertines,” “Minucius Felix,” etc. And there’s a history about the Catholic Church literally killing them all out (see “Cathars,” e.g.). I figured the early Christians did it (the semen) under God’s inspiration to give me needed support today, but, who knows, maybe they knew of the health reason too. Therefore, there may very well be a scientific reason why they call homosexuals “gay.” Maybe all the greed and cruelty would lessen if we all didn’t waste the stuff. Gay opposites like country music listeners seem to be the most angry, violent, and ready to fight. I think gays want to join the military just because it used to be they couldn’t. You’ve got to realize the power of selfish pride (gays are still human). Once someone in the military told me they don’t have anything personal against gays, it’s just that they don’t really have the sufficient aggressive disposition for killing, the joy of destroying valuable things, etc. [paraphrase]. I also think that the only reason gays and lesbians want to marry is mainly because society says they can’t. I don’t see the big advantage with things like the marriage tax penalty, etc. When my wife died (of cancer in 1989), I had to pay all her unpaid medical bills or lose my credit, because apparently marriage makes one financially responsible for the other’s debts. During the marriage, I had to keep my income separate from her’s, or her spending-to-bone would have put me out of business. But, others didn’t acknowledge the same prenup.
Sex releases beneficial beta-endorphins in the brain:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-endorphin, Beta-endorphin:
“Beta-endorphin is an endogenous opioid peptide neurotransmitter found in the neurons of both the central and peripheral nervous system.
Sequence: "Tyr Gly Gly Phe Met Thr Ser Glu Lys Ser Gln Thr Pro Leu Val Thr Leu Phe Lys Asn Ala Ile Ile Lys Asn Ala Tyr Lys Lys Gly Glu"[1]”
Thank you, but I think I’ll leave the sex medical advantages to those kinds of experts, and I’ll stick to the ethical / religious facts. Maybe O’Reilly could help the people by investigating if swallowing semen is really beneficial or just bull. (Ha-ha: that’ll never happen. See, so it could be true.)
Don’t forget to say something for the defenseless animals, Mr. Critical:
Someday a mother will tell her child that humans used to regularly eat animals. The child will initially not believe it.
Fox News says “We report, you decide”:
I wish they had the balls to do that with my Baptism-Cotytto findings; because, I’m certain the public would “decide” that today’s church has been lying to us about Jesus’ sex standards. But they don’t – they all just have vaginas.
“POLYAMORY IS WRONG!”:
I’m just glad to see that the opposition doesn’t have any intelligence.
But, I’ll tell you what’s even dumber:
People who can’t see the correlation between Jesus’ “new commandment” to “love one another” and:
http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/07/30/poly_sci/:
People who love (multiple) people
Newsweek delves into the ethics of polyamory
BY AMY BENFER
The opposers think the words don’t match, and the polyamories think the words don’t match. So, where’s that leave me?
I thought it was pretty cool the other day when I noticed someone had a t-shirt that said “Love one another” at a sex party I recently visited. Appropriate for the sex party, but also the exact words of Christ.
Then when people see my Septuagint proof that “agape” love included sexual love, they don’t think it matters to anything. I’m telling you all something you are “unable” to ever admit: “dumb”: it’s the root of all our preventable problems.
“Hopelessly Devoted to You, and You, and You ….”
Someday I’ll want to read the books: Love Without Limits and Polyamory, unlimited loving, just because you all actually believe Jesus would be against it.
At the sex party, I noticed three guys touching all the right places on one woman, surely making her orgasm better than any one man could accomplish or that she could attain by herself. So, most women don’t want multiple partners just because they’ve been taught it via “taboo.”
O’Reilly tells that sexting is now very popular with teenagers:
One/third do it, he tells. And, the imbecilic Manhattan Declaration still thinks they’re going to change it. All they’re going to do is cause more people to become atheists. I’m apparently the only person in the entire world who can bring them to Jesus.
(My 2002 Word spellchecker is telling me to correct the word “sexting.” That’s how new it is.)
“Sex and breakfast” is a video about “group sex therapy.”
”Eternal torture”:
If the Church won’t acknowledge the validity of my research, then I suggest that they do the opposite and make better emphasis that for hundreds of years, the Church has imbeddedly taught that the Bible says if you have ever had any kind of sex other than in heterosexual monogamous marriage, God will condemn you to the worst possible Afterlife torture forever, that will never end. Maybe O’Reilly or Hannity should stress that point. Come on guys, don’t vacillate in-between, take a firm stance; or, just shut up. I mean, sexual desire is a powerful thing for the Church to fight, so they have to pull out all their guns. There are nearly 500 cable channels today, therefore much promiscuity is caused by simple ignorance. Do something to make my dissemination recipients realize the importance of my findings.
Hurry, before this horrible thing naturally happens to everyone:
It side-frame scrolled by my innocent Web browser:
And, once you let people use sex to make money, then the Church is in for one major endless disappointment. Well, saving face is all they really care about the most; so, they don’t really care if people have open sex, they just want to make certain everyone knows they’re against it.
Mr. Critical – Fighting hard to make religion for everyone.
TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/