Subject: All I can say is: War is Heck!
And I hope you can all hear me! But, if your mom says you can’t use that word, then… You Can Look At It HERE!
10-19-07
I bet President Bush thought War is Heck after he saw the results of the 2006 elections.
Is O’Reilly square with what is right and just, or is O’Reilly just square?:
“Square”: “Slang. A person who is regarded as dull, rigidly conventional, and out of touch with current trends.” (Using the most correct and concise words to be more pithy, is a good way to speak.) “Dull”: “Intellectually weak or obtuse; stupid.” “Dull”: Another pithy based acknowledgement to Mankind’s problems. You see, “nincompoopery” maybe describes it better, but is not as pithy.
“Dumb”: Would the world stop turning or something if we could stop it?
Well, Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!:
Gol-ly, I guess Private Pile finally heard the ring of my Freedom Bell. Well, Shezam! And, in absolute anger has asserted that he never gave me permission to publish our “private” conversation, and has threatened me with criminal action, law suits, and that my ISP will soon be shutting me down. All I can say is “Pile: You lamebrain! You knucklehead! You nitwit! You, being a fabulous media asset to the world, should know that if CNN positions a microphone in front of my face, and asks me what happened, I have to legal right to say, ‘Yeah, I was in the cell with O.J. for about a half an hour. And he told me that he did it! And that he was very, very sorry.’ I have the right to say that, as long as it’s the truth! So, unless you can get me for changing the few characters of your vulgar speech, me and Sergeant Carter say you’d better learn some respect for your superior Goldenrule officer / critic, or I’ll order you and all your lawyers to do pushups for the rest of your life! Then it will be Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! when you find yourselves still doing them after you die.” I think it’s a good time for some music. I’m dancing, how about you? You should have first asked O’Reilly if it was advisable to cross me.
How many of you can tell that Pile was raised a rich spoiled kid, whose parents bailed him out of everything; whose ultimate purpose in life is being mean to others whenever he thinks he can get away with it? – The epitome of an atheist. I’ve known a few of these types, they can be found everywhere. They also think they’re smarter than everyone else, because they are experts in knowing what they can and can’t get away with. And find their most delight in life by practicing the “can” part to its ultimate. Many will initially think I’m the same way, but mine is really based on the Goldenrule, not just for my personal satisfaction (which I do seem to get a lot of, which just happens to be the result). I got some pretty good spankin’s when I was young. I mean, I try to only censure the evil dumb people out there. Sure, there are guys like Geraldo, who definitely isn’t the smartest cookie in the jar (concerning advanced conclusions), but does have somewhat of a kind heart, and a goal for truth and fairness (who also is a better reporter); where the smarter evil guys like O’Reilly and Hannity who actually endeavor to side with deception or whatever helps the “few” (but very financially powerful) to get richer – even if it’s dumb, like the Iraq war and its escalation. Well, when one is already wealthy, then “saving face” and “winning the game” becomes priority. And there are a lot of atheists that go to church, simply because of cowardice “just in case” reasons. And, “they” wouldn’t go unless they heard what they like hearing. So, there are a lot of “Christians” who are a lot worse then this moronic atheist guy. I hope I’m putting it all in proper perspective.
Poor atheists: they’re apparently the ones who fill up our prisons.
Hopefully:
“It was an attitude adjustment. I guess it was his first time. An attitude adjustment. Now he understands just fine. He got bent out of shape, and he opened his mouth, and just one appointment, straightened him right out. It was an attitude adjustment. Oh it’ll work every time.” –Hank Williams, Jr., 1984. Hey, I see y’all a two-steppin’. But, tell me if I’m wrong, I think the standard for these kinds is to do everything in their power to show that they aren’t going to change because of what I say. O’Reilly and Hannity are good examples, especially Hannity.
“Don’t tase me, bro!”:
What one atheist hopes I will soon be yelling.
Gotta have some more Hank:
To comply with the Septuagint (and 1Thes 5:26), I think the best way (but, not so pithy way) to describe the parallel of when Jesus preached His special kind of Goldenrule:
John 13:34:
A new commandment I give to you, that you have “I mean, I mean, I mean, I MEAN I love you; I dream, I dream, I dream, I dream all night about you; I’ll kiss, I’ll kiss, I’ll kissity-kiss-kiss kiss all over you; I do, yes I do, indeed I do, I SHORE do love you!” –Hank Williams, Jr., 1990 kind of love for one another. Play I Mean I Love You clip here.
:
I’ll try.
Proud way to live. Proud to way die:
The next time someone is trying to kill you, fight back or stand up and take it like a man – don’t lift up Jessica Lunsford in front of you to block the bullets, to save your selfish… donkey! Or, just realize they’re killing just another worthless piece of… emission in this overcrowded world. In other words, just at least realize the rest of us are going to be better off! So, if you support traditional war, then just get the… middle-finger out of here!
“Hurt no one so that no one may hurt you”:
–The Farewell Sermon, by Muhammad (delivered before his death, A.D. 632). We need to take that advice.
10-9-07:
Kudos to Bill O’Reilly for interviewing Mexico’s ex-president Fox, to see what can be economically done to make folks not want to cross the border. Good Bill. Hopefully that will lead to a solution. But, keep it pithy… or, maybe not – whatever works.
Increased school shootings:
James Dobson would say that it’s because overall so many people are leaving the church, thanks to the pill. I’d say it’s because overall so many people are leaving the church, thanks to the pill. James Dobson thinks the solution would be more STDs until no one desires sex outside of marriage, to direct fathers as the only means of support for our children. I think we should find cures for all the STDs and support sex outside of marriage, and start a Nationally Paid Child Support Program, which allows the antiquation of the marriage standard, and “guarantees” proper non-degrading financial support for all our children. It’d just be like an extension of our tax subsidized school system. I remember kids that I knew as nice people prior to their puberty, who became problem children after puberty. I don’t think that would have happened if they would have not found the strong suppression of their new God placed desire. James Dobson, a very well educated person, is against the major God placed desire, because he had been taught that way, and today needs to save face.
It just makes sense that a King who can have any woman he wants in the kingdom, would take away a major pleasure from all others, for the prime interest of productivity and achievement. Today, I think enthusiasm for productivity and achievement will increase when we allow the peasants / serfs / the deprived some kind of happiness / natural reward, instead of its constant suppression. The only problem is, I’m the only living person who thinks this. Overall, the abolishment of slavery didn’t curb productivity and achievement. If anything minds started pondering more on productivity and achievement. For today, someone had to figure out plumbing to replace the slaves who had to bring us the water.
I wonder if these gentlemen could sense that the 20th century would be a-smokin’ in progress:
What the heck happened? Did something crash on Y2K that none of us could prepare for? What Vista should we all prepare for? A “few” believe the logic rests with “If it worked once, let’s do it all over again.” So, say “goodbye” to all your older (and current) reliable programs and files.
Reality finally meets education in Portland, Maine (school makes pill available to 11-year-olds):
They finally noted a solution to teen pregnancy after learning the failures of abstinence (only) advice. Plus, I don’t think it would hurt a darn thing for all post-puberty kids to have sex with everyone (including the teacher) in their classroom; in fact, “I” can see how it would help a lot of things. – With effective birth control (which can be given by a shot – for those too irresponsible to take a pill), the only realistic reason to not, is because of STDs. The fact that I don’t hear Fox News telling kids to get the HPV vaccinations (which is today’s most common STD), shows that they “really” don’t want kids / people to not get STDs: they are Satan and just don’t want them to have sex. Just like the way they preached before incurable STDs (e.g., the 1960s, early 1970s). And all other news media are dogs who don’t inform our kids (and their parents) about “real” things that protect them. Kids, realize it’s a very evil, dumb, and antiquated power in control, who doesn’t mind at all to hurt you all, to retain their brainwashed points. I am your real friend, they all are your enemy. – Don’t Trust Anyone Over… Two(2)! They hurt and kill innocent people all over the world dishonestly under the auspices of the Goldenrule. Now, the highest leader tells we are now facing World War Three, simply because we refuse to move the Jews to West Texas. And, if they move, have them be seen as running cowards – that would help portray them correctly. So, no one likes my world fixes, eh? Or is it just my tone? If “I” could just find a way to be sort of “original,” with my so “un-original” agenda, then at least I’d please the atheist.
Hey, the Iraqi insurgents are still fighting us tooth and nail:
Hopefully, George W. Bush and all the imbeciles who supported the Iraq invasion don’t look too much like a bunch of out-of-touch with reality idiots which many more might contemplate. I mean, we called it Operation Iraqi Freedom as we’re bombing and directly shooting civilians. And, we are actually so dumb that we thought, and still think, we did it for the people of Iraq. I feel like they started cherry-picking my 1998 advice by only starting wars to “help the people” of said nation (also, Kosovo), but they seem to still ignore my prime directive of never hurting an innocent person. They retain economic sanctions past 1998 which just hurts the “innocent” people of Iraq, etc., kill thousands of more to acquire its government, then “wonder” why there’s an insurgency. Pitiful. And, our President is so out-of-touch with reality and logic that he will continue to add as many American deaths as he can, before he will finally, someday, eventually, admit “error”; with one-third of equally dumb people still supporting him. Country listeners would tell me that they aren’t so much dumb, as they are more so proudly and evilly bias for the United States right or wrong, supported by as many ignorings of truth and logic as can be; but, I think this Iraq thing is eventually going to prove them to be more “dumb” than anything else. I think people should watch Fox News more to see the continuous developing unveilings of this true slime. But, even with that, all the “liberals” in the future are going to fall into the same evil pit someday, as long as my stable rational messages don’t get disseminated: It’s going to be a lot harder cherry-picking the Goldenrule once my stuff gets disseminated to all the people. I can see the problem in the making: the word “liberal” means “generous” or “charitable.” So any future killing of innocent civilians by a “liberal” will be justification for its “generous” or “charitable” cause. Until “liberal” (also) means “never hurting an innocent person” it’ll surely fall back into another quagmire. Sure, you might see the logic of “never hurting an innocent person,” but what you quickly, selfishly forget is that you used to not, and therefore don’t realize no one else out there (who hasn’t read my stuff) doesn’t either. “Try”: “make an effort” to notice that. We should be “generous” and “charitable” to those who don’t hurt an innocent person, and very cruel and mean to those who do hurt an innocent person. Not, the vacillating justice system we have today. – With no single stable statement telling right from wrong, we’re never going to get fairness right. And it will never get done in a nation that thinks it’s okay to hold up Jessica Lunsford to block bullets. – And many think this U.S. ethic is what should be in charge of the entire world. “Dumb”: If we don’t hear the correct solution, few of us are going to know it. (Yes, I’m aware Fox News says it’s not that way.)
All the President can do is kill more innocent people; and, the more he escalates that, the more future problems we’re going to have. Again, anyone who wants to kill us over there is “innocent,” simply because we violently, non-discriminately, invaded their land for absolutely no fair justifiable reason; then on top of that our cowardice WMD reason didn’t even pan out. So not only are we the biggest evil in the world, but we are also the biggest imbeciles in the world. I know the worst of this evil isn’t even to first base on this understanding; so, what makes you think it isn’t going to happen again? I mean the only reason we haven’t “freed” civilians in other countries by killing them, is because something in Iraq is keeping us busy. Genghis Khan would be proud to be an American leader, but somewhat frustrated (because of Iraq). There’s a BIG line between killing military (who defends a leader who plans to kill innocent people) and killing civilians.
Or, realize invasions and conquering might go over better if you instead “admit” you’re evil, and just want to have the selfish position of power, just for the fun and thrill of it. Then at least the enemy will know you’re at least “honest” and somewhat smart. Watch Fox News and notice how none of it has to do with the safety of the troops, but whether we are winning the game. It’s rather entertaining when you know what’s really going on.
A lot of people must be deadly wrong:
Regarding the David Crosby statement, O’Reilly 10-17-07 spins that we have never killed any “mothers and sisters” in Iraq. So let’s give him that. But he also said the war and the problems it’s caused was “our fault.” So, if it’s “our fault” then any Iraqi insurgent who wants to kill us is logically justified. His conservative guest said that we’re protecting America’s “mothers and sisters” by staying in Iraq. The only logic to that is “since” we did something that was “our fault” to make those post-invasion Iraqis want to hurt us, then we’d better continue to do the selfish, cowardice and even more unfair thing. Like I’ve said before, people should watch Fox News to easily see the true evil in this world: the true problem “causers,” so to know how to correctly raise future generations. It may not be “so easy” to see in future times.
Jessica’s Law:
Contrary to what our interviewed soldiers tell about how much they “love it” when they get to “go in and kill,” I believe that this administration endeavors to not kill innocent civilians, but feels it as justified whenever it’s too our advantage or safety. That’s where my holding up Jessica Lunsford to block bullets comes into play. We should call it “Jessica’s Law.” And the law states that it’s simply okay for the United States to do it, but it’s not okay for Saddam Hussein to do it. Or, at least that’s the way some states still view Jessica’s Law, especially if you live in the states of O’Reilly, Hannity, or Ted Nugent. But, states like David Crosby and Graham Nash think Jessica’s Law should apply to everyone, regardless of the non-reality that its citizens are too dumb to understand on their own. “Too dumb”: We need a government to correct it, not to justify its evil by it. Hannity says he’s a Catholic, but the Pope / the Church is against the war. So Hannity is a good example of a cherry-picker. I know it’s a diverse Church, but anti-war is what Christ was all about. The only exception was regarding looks discriminated (Matt. 5:27-30) and that you should “hate” members of your own family (Matt. 10:35-37; Luke 14:25-26; Mark 3:31-35). So James Dobson is a cherry-picker also. But, I “love it” how much the true Christ: the true Words, supports “my” agenda. I am truly amazed, and actually believe in God even more, when I find “Jesus Christ” actually giving me such strong support. Why would that be? Could God have known that I would eventually come? And that if I’d have come before “Freedom of Speech” I’d have gone as quickly as I’d have come? Jesus stated He purposely did not say everything: John 16:12-15: 12“I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. 13However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will tell you things to come. 14He will glorify Me, for He will take of what is Mine and declare it to you. 15All things that the Father has are Mine. Therefore I said that He will take of Mine and declare it to you.” All I can say is that it’s just getting harder and harder for me to become an atheist.
By the way, Hannity, please explain to me why I’m supposed to have sympathy for our soldiers who explained how much they “love it” when they get to “go in and kill” (while like listening to some Ozzfest CD), where someone now is killing them back? I just think it’s funny. Please let me know if don’t understand why I think it’s funny.
-- What I should have also said to the atheist --
“Living in sin”:
Couples who just live together, who are not married, may start going to Church, and the pastor / priest may even be cool and never say anything. But, Church is also a social outlet, and all it would take is one other church member to make one snide remark or gesture about them just living together, how they are living in sin, and they’ll (eventually) quit going; and lean toward just becoming an atheist. And, especially in this country, there are a lot of people who can make themselves feel better or more holy, by saying something about someone who they’ve been taught is doing sin. (The only thing one should say to make them feel more holy over others is the Goldenrule, and “living together” doesn’t break the Goldenrule. It just breaks the rules of what the evil rich man used to order. – Well, scratch “used to” as we still have O’Reilly, Hannity, and President Bush.)
John Lennon:
Jesus Christ commanded “Love one another.” The Beatles said “All You Need Is Love” (1967). I clarify: the Goldenrule is the Word of God, in one word; and, most importantly, anything else is a cop-out! Notice any correlation? Now, getting into specifics, the Beatles asked more questions than gave answers. Even asserting that “There will be an answer, Let It Be” (1970, the final song). If the counterculture had given me the microphone back in the ’60, they’d have heard a lot of nothing from a dumb kid. But today, no one could win a debate with me! Even the highest paid spin doctor, who’s a top expert in knowing the dumbness of the public, would lose one-on-one against me. They know the only way to beat me is to simply not have the debate in the first place. The only power evil still has, is that my stuff is not yet disseminated. Then after that is accomplish, today, there’s still a tremendous amount of information being said, but when the dust all settles, mine will be the One still standing. I don’t recommend anyone debating my stuff without me. I repeatedly see people on my side of the issue who lose because they simply didn’t say it right, or fail to add the needed prerequisite(s). I get frustrated all the time in front of the T.V. knowing how I could have said it better. The most needed prerequisite is someone to first call everyone “dumb.” So, don’t you do it: let me do it. Don’t mess up your reputation, let me mess up mine. (This human who still happens to be living, has been dead for many years now; so, no one can hurt me! If someone crushes me, they do not hurt me, they only hurt God! And, these will need to pray hard that Genesis does not tell about God’s ability to judge what is good and what is not, as things continue / evolve.)
“Christianity is responsible for all the wars in the world”:
After the part I mentioned how everyone ignores Jesus’ anti-war instruction to “love your enemy,” I should have added how there is, however, one place where Jesus tells (or “contradicts”) to “hate” others. It has to do with the members of one’s own family (Luke 14-25-26; Matt. 10:35-37). Then I should have asked: “Do you get the message now? Do you now see how it is not such a contradiction?” in support of my sex issue, where I say we have to find a better way to feed our children than financially from the father; and that it isn’t going to even get considered unless “I” can get direct support from Jesus Christ Himself. (I’m totally aware that everyone is already smart enough to not believe me, and not bother looking at the verses I cite. So, me being so slow but accurate (late), I just hyperlinked them (the above) [which seems to be also from a site that uploads rather slow… but is accurate – like me. So bear with it.])
“Atheist”: That’s worse than being a Heathen or Devil (because those are at least religious). Now, “agnostic” I can understand. Since religion has to do with “faith.” As Jesus’ prophecies come true, people will find more credibility for God. With Jesus in so much support of my sex issue (especially in the areas I need it most: down with “family” and “looks discrimination”), when everyone “discovers” its benefits, having knowledge of history, everyone will believe more in God and Christianity. Now, if I only had a word directly from God, which tells His instruction of open bi-sexuality. A word that everyone could “easily” understand. What could that “one” word be? (I’m not referring to the “Goldenrule” one word here.)
Mr. Critical – Come to me now, and take what is yours.
TO SEE PRIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/
You see, you have to realize how I was mimicking the immaturity of Ted Nugent in an earlier letter to understand how I arrived at “Up your nose with my underclothes!” And, hopefully you can all now appreciate how “I” would make an excellent ornery 8th grader.