Subject: Up your nose with my underclothes!
Now you should be able to smell the sweet success of a February 1998 fax letter. (I bet our boys in Iraq wish they could smell something other than the bouquet of burnt bodies.)
9-24-07
Thumping right out of the Heartland:
How about some “strong brutal bloody violence and terror throughout, sexual content, graphic nudity and language”? Well, then just read my 03-21-06 first email letter. Wait a minute… I don’t publish any “graphic nudity” – you all know I’m not going to publish that evil of an evil: I try to stay pretty PG rated (except for that document). So, maybe it’s just the MPAA rating for Rob Zombie’s new movie Halloween: Evil Has A Destiny. Competition? No, mine’s real, his isn’t. So, try to keep up California! – Let’s just see you all try to compete with Kansas.
O’Reilly justifies his stuff:
“We had to establish the brutal nature of the crime.” –O’Reilly explained 7-19-07. Great Bill, so will you air some animal slaughter videos if I send them to you? Do it, and let’s see how fast we can get those inevitable vegetarian laws passed. Sure, start with dog fight videos, and end up at the local slaughter house. I double-dog dare you! Or, just tell about this proposal on your “Most Ridiculous Item of the Day.” Yeah, I double-dog dare you! You say, but animal slaughter isn’t illegal. I say, (1) just “educate” the viewers (show the videos), then (2) let the American people decide. I guess I just enjoy exposing the big talk B.S. in our media. You’re right, the more correct explanation is: “more dumb.”
“Graphic” images:
If you’re not a vegetarian, a graphic image is on your dinner plate. Yeah, if it was part of a cooked human arm, you’d realize it then.
UP YOURS! (Up your smarts with my five parts):
ü Up your life by not takin’ a wife!
ü Up your chore to stop that war!
ü Up your pay demanding the Goldenrule way!
ü Up your wheat and not eat that meat!
ü Up your route by forsakin’ that cop-out!
I think I used to be rather mellow:
I recently added my 1-27-98 paper to my website. After reading some of it, it is easy to tell that I was basically saying the same stuff I say today, but in a much kinder way. And I used to get copies mailed back to me from denomination heads torn into shreds (to express their anger). I am amazed how I was able to explain how dumb everyone was, but in a much more mellow statement. Maybe I can get the message across better (begetting more anger) by explaining evil with the nice / kind approach. However, I think I’ve forgotten how to write that way, eh? Today, it appears I can only “Fight Fire With Fire.” –Kansas, 1983.
Motor City Madman is mad about men who say our soldiers kill civilians:
Ted Nugent apparently doesn’t realize our troops do kill non-military Iraqis. So, Ted could you please review this video of Americans slaughtering Iraqi civilian farmers, and let me know exactly what the farmers did wrong to deserve it: http://www.zippyvideos.com/8355286005836436/faces_of_death_-_apache_helicopter_slaughters_iraqi_farmers/. Thanking you in advance. Maybe they deserved it because of Saddam Hussein’s killings in Dujail. Either way, it just makes me proud to pay my income tax. The thing I like about this video is that it also shows what we do to people who are wounded instead of taking them in as prisoners for medical attention. Hopefully God will treat all those who support the war the same way some day. Ted and others would probably answer: None of this old stuff matters anymore: All that matters is how are we going to protect Americans today from the growing number of people who want to kill us? – Because we are as selfish and scared as possible. Whenever I get selfish and scared, I’ll go out and kill some animals, so I can feel like a brave man again.
Now, we can ignore these kinds of events, but what we don’t realize is the Iraqi insurgents aren’t going to ignore these kinds of events. Duh. And the Iraq insurgents, who seek support from al-Qaeda, have been letting us know for now over four years. Yet, we don’t know. It has something to do with what our media reports and how much. Our media could go ahead and detail all our atrocities, and will find initially that most Americans (those in the majority who are hell-bound in a handbag) are going to care less about the innocent killing we do in other countries, and only care about “winning.” Ask O’Reilly and Hannity. By the time it makes any difference, most people living today will be dead and gone. So, let’s now go ahead and help our future generations.
The American motto:
If you live in another country whose leader once killed innocent people, then you deserve to die!
Capitol Hill hearing on Iraq war:
General Petraeus reports status of Iraq boner. Petraeus displayed charts showing how the boner is getting softer, but inside information tells that pharmaceutical companies seek to know Petraeus’s secret formula in making boners bigger and harder. Nonetheless, I’m finally impressed with the hearing in that it wasn’t just the same old one-step thinking idiots talking to other one-step thinking idiots, by spending the entire time discussing exactly who deserves restitution and to what degree. Of course, interrupting ladies had to be removed commenting how “restitution” will only make us more enemies over there! So the battle is not completely over.
“Totally insane”:
–The media caused total consensus of what Americans call people who think we do unfair things to cause the terrorists to want to get us. So things are a long way from getting fixed.
I figure the surge is doing some good:
When we kill a great number of people to kill a few more insurgents, we are stopping those particular insurgents from killing us, thereby lowering the numbers of the enemy. However, from the pattern we’ve all noticed (but not comprehended) over the last four years, since we are killing more “innocent” Iraqi people who just want to revenge for said pattern, things will surely just escalate even more in time. You see, the majority of Americans are even saying the Iraq war was a mistake. Since it was a mistake, then we shouldn’t have killed all who we have killed over there. Therefore, the American people are saying that our troops who are still over there deserve the consequences of death from those who rightfully wish revenge. Plus, if you’re a Muslim anywhere in the Middle East, it’s pretty apparent guys like O’Reilly and Hannity support the U.S. eventually taking full control of the entire world, and will never stop their very influential instigating spin until it is done. So when we condemn Hitler and fabricate that Saddam Hussein wants to take over the entire world, it’s easy to know who is also the worst kind of enemy to Mankind. Genghis Khan likely thought he was doing everyone a big favor by invading and conquering whoever he attacked. Hitler probably the same. And the only reason guys like O’Reilly and Hannity would want us to take over the entire world is just for the fun of the game: they could really totally care less (but would assert otherwise), even if our kind of system really would make things better. Though, democracy in Mexico sucks. It’s the teaching and the belief in the Goldenrule only that’s going to make things better, whether it’s a dictator or democracy. I mean, if we take over the world, and force everyone to, say, become a Protestant, where cop-outs are the standard, I don’t see how that could help anywhere. We’d just have to build more jails everywhere.
Slant drilling, etc.:
It makes sense why the terrorists want to kill us. I mean, we live in a country where violence is the only thing we understand. And, that just means “some” communication is getting across. And, I’m saying this because I don’t want to become the next victim of a terrorist. The best thing for millions of innocent people in this world, is that we “lose” this war in Iraq. I mean, if we get too high on our horse, we will do the same to many other countries in the future. Guys like O’Reilly and Hannity are just the top experts in knowing how to make mountains out of molehills (I know they’re going to take that as a compliment). And, all we really need is just the ignorance that we will “make things better” for those other countries. But, our true colors show when we “have to” bomb and kill innocent people to achieve that goal. And, I don’t think it would be good for a country to rule the entire world, that suppresses cures for diseases, and promotes abstinence and marriage as the only solution to sex.
John McCain tells how we can’t leave Iraq simply because there are now way too many people there who are out to get us:
Well, who’s the idiot that caused that to happen? Well… how would it be if someone instead took my February 1998 advice? You answer: Worse! Okay, I’ll give you that, because that’s easy to say; but, how could it be worse? Ironically, Bush actually had Saddam Hussein in full agreement of our weapons inspections without lifting sanctions against innocent Iraqis, but on his high horse, he decided to invade anyway. You say, Yes, but if he would have lifted those sanctions, surely that would have made the Iraq people out to get us worse than they do today. – Or, something to tell me I’m wrong.
I don’t think we’re ever going to have a solution in Iraq or Israel until we first admit that we are the evil / unfair ones. Since we are the real evil there, anyone who shoots any American in Iraq today is not hurting an innocent person, but any American shooting back even in self defense, is hurting an innocent person, and will suffer equally in their afterlife. Now I can tell that Americans on the news are very far from knowing about this reality. Again, we’ve all been raised a “no fault” nation, so it’s nearly impossible for an individual to realize on his own. And Democrats who want to pull out, aren’t doing it to repent, because no one truly repents unless they seek restitution. I’m sorry, but I’m in violation of truth and logic if I say it any other way. If you just want to hear bootlick or more dumb solutions, then just tell me to go to hell. Again, those Muslims aren’t going to take our normal bullying and unfairnesses. But the root reason the word “dumb” fits better is because most people don’t even know we are unfair bullies. So, I don’t see a solution until people first admit how dumb they really are.
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usbush0914-speech,0,7800291.story, Transcript of speech:
“Our troops in Iraq are performing brilliantly. Along with Iraqi forces, they have captured or killed an average of more than 1,500 enemy fighters per month since January.” –President Bush, speech, 9-13-07. I bet we’re just doing the same thing that Saddam Hussein did in Dujail: killing anyone suspicious; and so to provides more credence that the surge is working. I think we’re just making more enemies. – Each “enemy fighter” killed in Iraq can easily be defined as “innocent” in the eyes of any realistic Iraqi. Therefore, technically, that’s 1,500 “innocent” people per month. That’s 1,500 Toby and Willies per month. And if the Soviets took control of the U.S. during the Cold War violently (I’m talkin’ the nukin’ of many major American cities), say in 1983, then it’d have been a lot more Toby and Willie “innocent” insurgents per month being captured or killed by the Soviets in the United States by 1987, eh? You see, just by changing shoes, one can easily see reality; where otherwise, forget it. – “Dumb”: I’ve got it all figured out. Well, we had weapons of mass destruction in 1983; which definitely posed a threat against the Soviet Union. – Much more of the threat than did Iraq in 2003 against us, even if Iraq had WMD programs. So if anybody wants to debate Iraq war ethics with me: you’re gonna “LOSE”! Constantly lying to ourselves is the American way, and I don’t think the Muslims are going to just sit down for it. – Their book tells them not to.
Up your scene with Al Gore’s green!
I suppose.
It could be that “dumb” will be the cause of WWIII:
Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants to visit ground zero (and lay a wreath). But New York City police say they’re not going to protect him. That’s because they’re “one-step” thinkers. The “intelligent” thing to do would be to invite Ahmadinejad to as many places in America as possible – especially places he wants to visit. So try to get out the travel brochures again (to further enthuse him). That would cause a feeling of not wanting to hurt us in Ahmadinejad’s subconscious. He might even begin to see little harm in women who don’t wear scarves. He could visit our Christian Churches and find out that Jesus paid the penalty for any of his past, present and future wrongs. Well… maybe we shouldn’t have him visits our churches. But, all that takes a “two-step” thinking process, so if the media doesn’t explain it, it’s not going to get done. And, because of our ignorant bias media, the more places Ahmadinejad visits, the greater the chance of some American Toby or Willie shooting him. So, I recommend having my stuff disseminated, then make friends with the enemy in a way that’s definitely not going to hurt us (visits to places of interest). Eventually, we’ll all be pals. But, if he starts going places the way many Americans currently think, and gets assassinated, then problems will surely become a lot worse with Iran. I remember Soviet leader Khrushchev visiting the U.S. back in 1959. Of course, I really question if Ahmadinejad is the one in need of the most change.
On the Tonight Show 9-10-07:
Brad Garrett told how women rule the world, and joked that the reason the vagίna is shaped the way it is, is so a man can swipe his credit card. Now, humor the Catholic Church with that one, to help enlighten them about the prostitution they support. “Reality”: it’s hard for others to see.
All women:
“Never assume you’re safe.” –Advice for women on Fox News. That’s caused by the churches’ marriage standard – nothing else.
“Child molester”:
…is defined by Fox News as an 18-year-old man who gets somewhere with his willing 17-year-old girl friend – but, not to full intercourse; OR, a 40-year-old man who kidnaps, rapes, sodomizes, terrorizes and beats an unwilling 9-year-old girl. So take your choice.
Tell me, are they quakin’ or are they just fakin’?
Unless you have something very smart and beneficial to say, don’t ever talk strongly against a U.S. President, especially if you write religiously about stuff that they are too dumb to understand. Because the government will love taking away your Freedom of privacy, and will put you under surveillance apparently for the rest of your life. We might as well have Hitler running the country doing whatever he feels like doing, when we practice Freedom of Speech. Once I was coming home from a vacation, in line at the motel I was planning to stay at in St. Louis; some woman came up to me and started asking those same old non-fitting kinds of questions, which are easy to read as a government spy – asking me where I’ve been, where I’m planning to go, etc. On vacation, not keeping up with the news, I later heard that Bill Clinton was in Louisville (on the news later that evening), a town I had earlier driven through (I didn’t even stop while traveling through Louisville). (GPS on my car.) I have absolutely no desire to commit any kind of crime – which would totally disgrace my writings; but, of course, they don’t know that. I feel like I’m David Koresh. If I wanted to equally hurt every person who has ever hurt an innocent person, that would have to include everyone in the entire world to some degree, including myself. Plus, I don’t have the needed facts to know. That’s why Jesus instructed us to forgive all, because He does know, and He assures He will make them all suffer equally (Matt. 5:22-26). I found three (3) microphones under the edges of the carpet before I even moved my stuff into this new house I recently got. They also have microphones in the wall sockets that’s wired to the house; so, I’m paying for them to listen to me. But, I just leave it all there, like I did before; because, they’d just come in when I’m not here and hide some more anyway. Plus, I’d probably have to pull up the entire carpet to find them all. They know I know they have me bugged, because sometimes I’ll talk to them directly into their microphones. The American in me doesn’t like any of it, but the religious writer in me says to let them listen, because, as I’ve said before, they’ll actually take some of my advice before I send it out. My next door neighbor and the lady living across the street at my old address used to ask the same kind of mysterious questions. I could be wrong, but they both had moved in after 1999, so I figure they got a little discount on their houses for helping out the government, which one worked at. I mean, once you’ve been living for a while, you just know what’s real and what’s not. Other things have happened indicating that they even know when I’m going to be walking out my front door. Probably some kind of heat detection. So I feel sorry for someone trying to burglarize my place, because the government knows when I’m not home, and will likely know when someone’s in my place who shouldn’t be. So, there’s another possible advantage of it all. Now, since you government people can hear and analyze things so well, tell me if my ladies’ orgasms are real or Memorex? I mean, are they in the sky or is it all just a lie? Just tell me, should I be awakin’ that her shakin’ is fakin’, or can my partakin’ be taken as not mistaken? I need to know: is her squeal real, or does she not feel the deal? If you like what’s you’re-a hearin’, then come on over and we’ll party!
Occasionally, I’ll have dates with women who I can tell are just surveillance government people trying to get information out of me. I especially like it when I get sex off them. Then I’ll say, “Baby, you’re not fooling me one bit: I can tell you’re a government spy, because nobody’s that stupid!” Then they’ll always prove me right by never returning any of my calls. One has to get up pretty early in the morning.
Mr. Critical – Around “profound.”
TO SEE PRIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/ (updated from original)
MORE ON THE WEBSITE:
I added my original 1-27-98 paper (the entire thing), which includes a fitting explanation of the Book of Revelation. Also, if you’d like to see a great deal of detailed research about God’s Free Food in the natural state of the land (it was a literal Garden of Eden, that’s not existing today), see here.
Also, I added my Septuagint agape (love) research, for some well deserved relief for any of you who have ever had sex outside of marriage. (Agape is the original Greek word used in John 13:34, e.g.) Note: This information is so threatening to the lying church that they have instructed practically all dictionary publishers to corrupt their definitions of “agape” to actually specify that it doesn’t represent any kind of “sexual” (or “erotic”) love. Apparently, dictionary publishers’ job is only to define to the context of how it is used today. Random House Dictionary actually contradictorily defined it both ways (the old and the new). More on this later. I have a ton of other kinds of similar support that first needs to get organized, if I ever get the time. – There’s a lot to go through. You all should hope that I don’t get hit by a truck. For years, after my wife died of cancer, after being put down by the churches for my sex with other single women, being a die-hard perfectionist, I just never could figure out why God condemned my sex with other singles. So when I finally researched it to try to find out why, I found that He really wasn’t putting down my kind of sex out of marriage. And that, apparently along with a series of other kinds of problems inspired me to start writing. Because, I know for a fact, others don’t know it.
-- Home (Index) --