Subject:  The identifying “W” has been inverted:

 

Because, most would agree that his middle initial now stands for Mud: George M. Bush.

 

4-21-08

 

What do I mean “now”: how about for the last few years?  Oh well, that’s what one gets for not heeding my “Never hurt an innocent person” advice.  Ha, ha, ha!

 

Oh yeah!  Well we’re still not going to “heed” your self-centered, cherry-picking advice, Mr. Critical:  We’re going to show you soon how we will kill hundreds of times more innocent Iranians, just to let you know how we can also later save-face concerning Iran.  Nobody’s gonna tell us when to quit saving face!  And, we might not even have to answer tough questions from the American people again, as long as O’Reilly can continue to successfully spin that we never kill innocent people.  So there!

 

But, I think the elbow has fallen:

And, George didn’t even need the Phelps Family flipped-flag-standers to do it: George did it all by himself.  When I advised in 2002 that one is never justified in hurting an innocent person, I wasn’t just whistling Dixie: I was informing a very, very dumb people about something they didn’t know.  Asking the Iraqis to just forget about the Amiriyah civilian shelter, e.g., is like telling Toby and Willie to forget about 9/11.  You were just too stupid to realize that Saddam Hussein was much more your friend than are the Iraq Toby and Willies.  Wealthy Iraqis aren’t going to care near as much as the poor Iraqis; and, I’m sure all you heard was the wealthy Iraqis talking before your invasion.  But, now the poorer Iraqis have found an easy way to let their voices be heard, since you’re made your mindless representatives so easy to find, eh?

 

The question is, who’s really running this country: Bush or O’Reilly?  Probably O’Reilly.

 

He calls it The No “Spin” Zone, like all other media spin.  But I’m not the only one who can tell that O’Reilly has the biggest “spin” show.  So “try” to quit listening to your 78 rpm records and spin toward me and the Goldenrule.  Fossil-minded people like O’Reilly, and evil-minded people like Hannity seem to go good together.

 

We’re all not as perfect minded as we think:

I’m guessing the only ones who still support the Iraq war and George W. Bush are only those who once voiced their opinion for the war back in 2003.  Therefore, self-pride and saving face is a major problem against the betterment of the world.  Some are strong enough to overcome, but most are not.  Like is there anyone who was first against the Iraq war in 2003, but now says it was a necessary invasion?

 

any simple minded Americans “just” assume we have a good purpose for being in Iraq at this point.  And, possibly we even do.  But, from the people of Iraq’s point of view, they’ll always know that we’re the people who bombed, massively terrorized, and wrongfully came into their country killing all those innocent people.  So I don’t see how those people could ever be totally accepting of our changes to their government, good or bad.  It just goes against human nature.  Maybe after everyone currently living has passed away – that is if we don’t kill any more people over there.  We are the terrorists over there.  We’re the invaders over there.  We were even in the wrong in invading.  “Dumb”: it’s the American way.  Apparently “success” just means one can be dumber.

 

Why there’s stuff:

When we say “nothing” created matter, we’re really saying that “we don’t know” what created matter, but most people agree that “something” (unknown to our minds) (not “nothing”) created it.  Could it be that since our minds only sense material data, that we can only think related to material data, knowing that there has to be something beyond / above / below / within it?  It’s like how we know what time is, but we don’t know where it starts and stops; size, distance, numbers, etc.: we know these things are “endless.”  Before major religious corruptions, religion had always been examinations from the more intelligent minds, not the less.  But, today, because of irrationalities and inconsistencies from religious corruptions, atheists “think” they’re smart for not believing in God

 

The stuff I talk about:

You say it’s stuff that’s just weird and wrong because it’s not what gets taught in the Universities, and I say it’s something unique and well thought out, that you’re not going to (fully) hear anywhere else.

 

Higher aptitude, Nazi minds:

Perfection, in mind and body!  And trash anything or anybody that’s not!  Robot minds sound good, but very advanced perfection tells that “happiness” is the primary goal of Mankind, where technological advancements are really secondary.  Technological improvements usually just makes us all happier, hence very good to pursue.  You see, our desire for happiness is a God placed thing: what we desire for happiness is what God wants us to desire for happiness.  (Again, the problems come in when one person’s happiness is another’s unhappiness, or innocent suffering.  Thereby, why the Goldenrule is what “needs” further instruction.)  So, when we have a person who was born with some physical or mental imperfection, allowing their humane need for happiness is still priority.  I know I’d be shot for not being able to see 20/20, just so I wouldn’t be able to further spread by faulty genes.  You see, mankind has abolished slavery, has more concern for the handicapped, discrimination is on its way out, etc.  This shows that the trend to considerate righteousness is the “accepted” wave of the future; else Hannity would be able to successfully argue to bring back slavery, for instance.  Now, if we could just trash the Nazi minds, and every lesser imperfection thought, then I’d be a very, very lonely person in this big old world all by myself.  So, if “I” can put up with all the imperfections and dumbness in this world, then the Nazis should try to match my stronger superiority.  So, try to find some happiness in your heart when a young cripple takes his first step, instead of wishing his body just to be another tossed atop your stack of bodies to be burned.

 

I’m telling ya: “Never hurt an innocent person” is it.  And I can tell that Republicans are just want-to-be Nazis.  Democrats are just the ones with the lesser aptitudes, with most of their politicians really being Republicans (except during partisan game time, of course).

 

Country-Western listeners:

“Two-stepin’” can also be something you do with your brain.  That way you can think outside your box of only what you’ve been taught.  When someone starts a war with us, instead of just gettin’ angry and mindlessly fighting back, you can then ask yourself if we did something unfair to provoke it.  When your teenage daughter tells you she wants to have sex with her boyfriend, instead of demanding abstinence, you can now furnish her birth control and disease prevention.  Instead of thinking that steak tastes so good, you can now find information that tells you you’re literally eating shϊt.  Etc.  Otherwise, you’ll always be stuck in a world where someone knows you “Stepped in what?” –Isaac Payton Sweat, 1997.

 

Country-Western listeners 100 years from now:

“Now I’d-a been married a long time ago, if it hadn’t oughta been for Cotton-Eyed Joe. Where did he come from, where did he go, where did he come from a-Cotton-Eyed Joe?”

 

“What’d you step in?”

 

Dictionary of True Etymologies, Adrian Room, 1986, p. 83, “hippie”:

Conversely a “red neck” must be basically non-aware of current developments.  Boy that fits.

 

Now don’t think I’m not prudent: When I’m vacuuming the carpet, I crank up the loud Rock ‘n Roll!  But when I’m doing home repairs, I turn it to Country music because I just know I’ll do a better job.

 

Hey, don’t be a “clodhopper” win righting oreilly@foxnews.com.

 

Opportunists:

The New Black Panther Party is a good example:  They continued to side with the contradicting black woman in the Duke Rape case.  That tells me they don’t really give a hoot about what’s right.  The just continue their evil farce with hopes in making others believe their race deserves more, I guess from the government.  The fact that they are very dumb just makes them not as much of a danger.  I’m sure there are still many instances where these organizations can find valid instances to support their cause and do what’s right; but, this New Black Panther Party is just a bunch of evil opportunists, right or wrong.  American Indians have tried doing the same thing by complaining about things like the use of name: Kansas City Chiefs.  Argue the valid points only guys.

 

I guess any spin is the same.  Like how our news media spun the Saddam Hussein slant drilling issue for the benefit of the American people.  Well, the American people reaped their benefit on 9/11 and with this current Iraq war.  The American people should give all the mainstream media a raise for a job well done, like via a government grant or something, so I can be reaffirmed how dumb everyone at every level really is.

 

My goal is to attain the greatest moral knowledge ever.

 

Radicals / protesters:

Since everyone is basically an idiot, many people who join groups of change are just mean people who enjoy hurting others.  That is, the change sought may be a good idea, but many of its followers just like to participate because they enjoy irritating others right or wrong.  I remember this was the case in the 1960s, as well as today.  Those types can make it very hard to get a good issue listened to.

 

Topeka, Kansas:

…maybe in 3007.

 

The generic of war:

War is basically evil against evil:  Hannity’s against Hannity’s.  That’s why there’s limited regard for the safety of civilians.  There are a lot of Hannity’s in the world, simply because we’re all dumb emotional animals.  What to be “better”?  Don’t be like Hannity.  Self-centeredness and deception is all they know.  War protestors are just people who wish to not have to be involved in the dispute of, again, evil against evil.  All the rest of us believe that there has to be a side in the total right and a side in the total wrong.  And every time that is determined simply by which side one lives.  Of course, one also has to be “smart” enough to know what’s really going on:  For example: Everyone’s (especially our justices’) ethics seem to be: If the law says what we want, then our hands are tied because of law; but, when the laws is contrary to what we want, then we ignore the law and do it anyway.  Americans’ attack against Iraq, and reasoning for attack against of Iran are both good (major) examples.  So when someone is “smart” enough to know what’s really going on, and is not on his knees in any fashion – well, I’m probably the only one who has ever existed meeting that criteria.

 

No one seeking approval can say this (yet it needs to get said):

The reason you country music listeners are so patriotic, and vote Republican while having Democrat incomes, is because y’all have lower I.Q.s.  You see, no one else can assert full truth when they are restricted by only saying either what makes them money or by what makes people like them.  So my non-bootlick technique is very unique, and is the only possible way for the betterment of mankind.  The way things currently are, people requiring a non-insulting word, will eventually cause WWIII.  If conservatives didn’t also have the dumb on their side they’d probably never gain the majority.

 

“I don’t give a durn what other people think – what do ya think about that?” –Montgomery Gentry, released Oct. 24, 2006.

Yeah, that is the smartest thing a dumb person can say.

 

I realize people are going to work a lot better when they have their pride.  We just gotta make their pride the Goldenrule, that’s all.

 

Wake up, country music “Christians”:

http://frterry.org/History/Chapter_2/Chap.2%20Christians%20in%20a%20Hostile%20World.htm (Father Terry's Verbal Conscience), Chapter Two: I. Christians in a Hostile World First to Third Centuries, "B. Objections from philosophers and politicians":

Celsus, in the second century and Porphyry in the third, launched their attacks [against Christians] in three directions. …

b. Bad Citizens--they did not participate in the empire's worship. They rejected military and magistracy service. Caesar was currently fighting the Germans on the banks of the Danube and if all citizens acted like Christians there would have been no empire.  You mean somebody else would just be in charge of the same basic laws?

…

g. Christians in the administrative system and in the army-- Tertullian affirmed Christians were everywhere, even in the army. A decade later he changed his mind and said that 'no Christian could be a soldier for the emperor and remain Christian'. Because the early Christians believed that Christ was coming again very soon he advocated a complete break from the world whose end was near. Military service was not compulsory, but for those already in and converted to Christianity were caught in a difficult situation since military service was for twenty years. Church discipline required that the soldier must refuse to take the military oath or to kill, since that was a form of idolatry. It was not easy.

http://frterry.org/History/Chapter_2/Chap.2%20Handout_27.htm (Father Terry's Verbal Conscience), Handout #27: A Christian cannot be a soldier:

By forbidding Christian soldiers to wear the crown during religious ceremonies, Tertullian concludes that it is impossible for Christians to remain in the army.  

Shall it be held lawful to make an occupation of the sword, when the Lord proclaims that he who uses the sword shall perish by the sword?  And shall the son of peace take part in the battle when it does not become him even to sue at law?  And shall he apply the chain, and the prison, and torture and punishment, who is not the avenger even of his own wrongs? And shall he keep guard before the temples which he has renounced?    And shall he take a meal where the apostle has forbidden him?  And shall he diligently protect by night those who in the day time he has put to flight by his exorcisms, leaning and resting on the spear the while with which Christ's side was pierced? Shall he carry a flag, too, hostile to Christ?  Tertullian, De corona ch. 11, about 210 A.D.

http://frterry.org/History/Chapter_2/Chap.2%20Handout_28.htm (Father Terry's Verbal Conscience), Handout #28: Occupations forbidden to candidates for baptism:

Hippolytus, a priest in Rome at the beginning of the third century, suggests models for liturgical prayer in his Apostolic Tradition and indicates conditions needed for baptism and ministry.

If a man be a priest of idols or a keeper of idols either let him desist or let him be rejected. A soldier of the government must be told not to execute men; if he should be ordered to do it, he shall not do it. He must be told not to take the military oath. If he will not agree, let him be rejected.

A military governor or a magistrate of a city who wears the purple, either let him desist or let him be rejected. 

If a catechumen or a baptized Christian wishes to become a soldier, let him be cast out. For he has despised God.  Hippolytus, Apostolic Tradition, II, xvi,16-19

You mean early Christians followed Christ’s teaching much more then they do today?

 

Chronological and Background Charts of Church History, Walton, Zondervan Publishing House, 1986, chart 5, “The Arguments of the Apologists”:

 

http://theology.nd.edu/people/research/yoder-john/documents/EARLYCHRISTIAN.pdf, EARLY CHRISTIAN "DISCIPLINES" OR "CHURCH ORDERS", p. 3 of 14, “4) Apostolic Tradition”:

A soldier under authority shall not kill a man(16). If he is ordered to do it, he shall not carry out the order; nor shall he take the oath. If he is unwilling, let him be rejected. He who has the power of the sword, or is a magistrate of a city who wears the purple, let him cease or be rejected. Catechumens or believers who want to become soldiers should be rejected, because they have despised God.

 “5) The Canons of Hippolytus (c. 170-236 AD)”:

Of the magistrate and the soldier: let them not kill anyone, even if they receive the order to do so; let them not put on crowns.(19) Anyone who has authority(20) and does not do the justice of the gospel, let him be cut off and not pray with the bishop.(21)

Anyone who has received the power to kill(22), or a soldier, let them not kill in any case, even if they should receive the order to kill. Let them not utter an evil word. Let those who have received a distinction not put a crown on their head.

Anyone who is raised to a prefect's authority or to the magistracy and who does not put on the justice of the gospel, let him be cut off from the flock and let the bishop not pray with him.

Let a Christian not become a soldier. A Christian must not become a soldier, unless he is constrained by a chief who has a sword. Let him not take on himself the sin of blood. But if he has shed blood, let him not take part in the mysteries [sex orgies] unless he has been purified by a punishment, by tears and groans.(23) Let him not exercise his command with duplicity but with the fear of God.

I think O’Reilly would call early Christians “a bunch of Left-Wing Loons!”

 

http://www.adultcatholiced.org/downloads/CH_f03_1.pdf, Church History, “3. Society, State and Christianity”:

Christians became socially isolated from public cult and generally held aloof from public service, condemned military service until about 200 AD. Christians argued that they were good citizens. Christian social charity was admired.

Now let me see, was Jesus before or after 200 AD?

 

Football, boxings, all sports:

Basically, no “innocent” people are getting hurt: All players are volunteers.  Enjoy.

 

What “softly appareled in kings’ palaces” probably looked like:

 

Luke 16:19-31:
¹⁹“There was a certain rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen and fared sumptuously every day. ²⁰But there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, full of sores, who was laid at his gate, ²¹desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table. Moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. ²²So it was that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels to Abraham’s bosom. The rich man also died and was buried. ²³And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. ²⁴“Then he cried and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.’ ²⁵But Abraham said, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted and you are tormented. ²⁶And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us.’ ²⁷“Then he said, ‘I beg you therefore, father, that you would send him to my father’s house, ²⁸for I have five brothers, that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.’ ²⁹Abraham said to him, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’ ³⁰And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’ ³¹But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’”

Supporters of O’Reilly and/or Hannity really should pray that Jesus was “just” wrong.  Especially those who are advocates against the poor.  (Not those who say helping the poor is advising them to work a second shift, to make ends meet.)  A good example is those who reject poor Mexicans wanting to come to the United States for a better life.  Sounds like to me, you can be rich, but you’d better be doing everything you can to efficiently feed the poor, and equally support their health, or you’ll be stuck on the other side of the “great gulf” “in torments in Hades.”

 

Maybe you all don’t understand that your local pastor is smart enough to know what to say and what not to say to get your money.

 

And I think you all had better more listen to me to know what can be done for the needy and victims of society, because the Democrats don’t even know what “should” be done.  For example, we should back our military out of Iraq, then pay a great deal of “restitution” to the people of Iraq.  Then they’ll quit hating the United States so much, and when they become healthy, wealthy and wise (spread my message) they’ll quit fighting against each other so much.  No one else is even close to my level of intelligence on these subjects; and, I get great support from someone named Jesus Christ (the most popular person who has ever lived).

 

“The love of money is the root of all evil” – Saint Jerome, Letter 22: To Eustochium, verse 32, 384 AD

 

During Republican debate, approval ratings went down when candidates spoke compassion for lesser peoples:

That’s because “higher” people who vote Republican are the real dirt of the earth, when it comes to loving your brother as Jesus ordered.  It’s simply because the church cop-outs work very well. – You’re either part of it and will never admit it to yourself, or you’re not part of it, and are just too stupid to realize it.  I seem to be the only living human who understands church cop-outs, but doesn’t make use of it to my selfish advantage.

 

Apparently, the best thing for a Republican candidate is to say the “right / fair thing,” but in a way that lets your constituents know that you really don’t mean it and plan an all for the rich and kick the poor when they’re down administration.  Quit trying to fool everyone and yourself that you’re honest.  Let your opposers point out your contradictions: it can very well be to your benefit, if you’re a Republican.  (Not advisable if your name’s Peterson, and you just killed another wife.)  Winning the game is much more important to Republicans than others, simply because when one has it all, self image, self pride, and personal entertainment, becomes central.  So Republicans will be somewhat depressed for a day or so, if we “lose” the Iraq war – we already have all the war ethics on our side, just ‘cause we say so.  I think if current day Republicans ever get it where everything goes their way, they’ll push to reinstate slavery.  But I personally think the liberals are the ones who are going to grow.

 

Drew Peterson case:

It’s just a “coincidence”: What cops say when someone they like is suspected of a particular crime two or more times.  He’s definitely “guilty”: What cops say when someone they don’t like is suspected of a particular crime two or more times, even when there’s solid evidence proving they’re innocent.  I.e., if somehow found solid evidence that Drew Peterson is innocent on one of the murder allegations, then we would favor assumption that he may not have done the other crime either.  But if they find solid evidence that a poor black man is innocent of anything, who they’ve already arrested, he gets convicted anyway – just so authorities can better save face.  What would we think if we found valid evidence that his fourth wife disappeared just in an attempt to frame him?  (Which I doubt is the case here.)  Then even the atheist would believe.  But, the authorities would still railroad the black guy.  If you don’t think so, then you are really unaware.

 

Atheists trying to prove their case:

Lots of atheists use Bible problems to prove there’s no God on the church taught premise that there’s no way the current English Bible could be corrupted in any kind of way.  But, Revelation 22:18-19 tells that it definitely can be corrupted, and that’s from God.

 

Sorry, it’s just built a certain way:

It’s like when you fall down, God doesn’t just make you stand back up via a miracle.  What God has done via creations through time (via evolution) created you with arms and legs that are intended to help you get back up after you have fallen.  Still, some people have fallen and can’t get back up.  Today, God via more creations through time has invented the medical button for seniors to help you get back up.  It’s something that was not available in certain past times, but is now and will be in the future.  Betterment in emanations is God’s plan for a better world.  God’s imbedded pressure (for happiness; against suffering) for this betterment is the slight drive (like 1% over 0%) in everything that causes us to include ourselves as part of it.  Everything is dependent upon its source, is the way God’s world really works, and “drives” further from there.  Not by accident (only), because accidents have no drive.  When a church says God can do anything, and you’ve fallen and can’t get up and don’t have a medical button, then people become atheists and feel all other church teachings are bunk, causing them to forsake the all important Goldenrule, which in turn slows better creations through time.  More often probably when one asked God to make that girl (or boy) to like them (romantically) and He doesn’t.  That also is because the Goldenrule has been caught in the way of the extant church pressured by the greed and ignorance of money.  Forsaking the Goldenrule is overwhelmingly only advantageous for the individual, lessening better creations through time for all.

 

The “drive” that created the universe is in every one of us also, where it is mostly manifested.  But like how the underlying elements of a rock may wish but cannot “drive” for better, it’s drive is hampered until something in the “image” / drive of God (an independent moving organism [us]), chooses to move it, based on the same instilled drive for something better.  Today’s problem comes in when someone’s drive for something better hurts another “innocent” person’s drive for something better or simply something not worse.  So the Goldenrule is God’s only instruction, as the Bible says is summed up.  Plus, as most of us know, a drive for something better can be a mistake, like why God in Genesis “judged” major eras as either Good or bad – which didn’t get mentioned for redundancy reasons, until of course man disobeyed God (by spreading the “knowledge” that animals are edible; and, covering their bodies [with “fig” leaves, which represented Hera, the goddess of marriage]).  (If we licked a smelly animal or bit into a small one, it wouldn’t taste good, so we have no natural knowledge that animals can be food until be are taught it.  And that first occurred by us watching carnivores eat.  Then once you’re not hungry any more, you’re convinced.  So, I’d say that God has me all set up.)

 

Each particle of matter has another “trail” of its geographic “time dimension” history “inside” it (but outside of it from another particle’s point of view relative to the two’s varying distances apart throughout history).  “God” can not change that, but God can very so lightly into the future to increase or warp a particle’s speed and size to “drive” for something better or different.  However, God must be careful to not exceed a threshold that could technically create another galaxy (where you’re standing).  The proper amount of resistance must bring it back down.  If God’s stabilization of all matter constrained by set sizes was overly violated, the next galaxy created in the universe could destroy the entire universe.  “Direction” and “volume” of resistance is what creates a different looking galaxy.  If God was an “accident” no galaxies would exist at all, as no laws of consistencies and limitations would reckon into anything stable.  A galaxy is something which we can also partially see (being more near the “image” of God: we see it like any animal, but also judge it as more good or not as good).  A law of God that we are all familiar with is if the diameter of a particle (or function, or set of rules) is identical it cannot pass through it.  (Otherwise we could put our hand through the wall with out anything moving.)  Plus, it just wouldn’t look right for big three foot diameter sub-atomic particle to be sitting next to you right now, now would it (unless an atheist can make it happen via an accident)?  All of this can be done via “rules” not by haphazard accident as the atheists claim.  Smaller passable particles also “push” the larger particles, which makes gravity, while decreasing the diameter of the smaller particle at the same time, making them pass quicker with less resistance as they fly through the planet, regaining size way out the other side far into space, just to eventually fall back in.  That’s what makes planets and stars round.  Same size collision vibrations creates an unstable kind of circular matter (or image) called energy, which may or may not pass through the stable matter depending on the diameter of its trail history, being the older the history the smaller the image (like radio “waves”).  Since God is restricted by His own laws that He must maintain to maintain the universe, God can not “risk” too much “help” for us, as we are not as important as the entire universe (nor the destruction of this planet for trying to help just the few, while passing once tolerance but not exceeding another); like how we should all know the repair of one person’s happiness can damage another’s.  I think the most God will “create” for us is hallucinations (via low unstable energy), but “has found (has judged)” that hallucinations are lies of the reality, that which we are to correctly drive for betterment.  If we aren’t seeing reality for what it really is how can we optimally improve it?  Plus, these hallucinations are set in our mind’s trail history, which our much larger brain substance will continually extract that same incorrect data.

 

Now I’ll talk about something you can maybe understand:

 

Who will get to decide who will live and who will die?:

When the next President gets that phone call at 3 o’clock in the morning, what will their decision be?  It’s been easy for our past Presidents:  If it’s an American, they get to live, right or wrong; if it’s not an American, they get to die, right or wrong.  I don’t know if it will be any different this next time.

 

Catechumen / Catechism:

–“One who is being taught the principles of Christianity.”  It can take years.  I can do it, and do it better, in One Word: Goldenrule.  There, you kids can all go home now.  But, if they want more, sure, come on in everyday and we’ll just talk about examples of the Goldenrule, and examples of what’s not the Goldenrule.  If some kid is slow, we’ll just split the Goldenrule into halves with “One is never justified in hurting an innocent person, and only those who hurt an innocent person should be hurt” and “Do nice and helpful things to others.”  Surely the most hindered of children should have it all figured out by then.  Adults?  Well they’re not going to be able to understand it as well (regarding today’s adults).

 

How come I’ve got to be stuck with the job of knowing it all?

 

Attention Catholic Church:

A History of the Councils of the Church, by Charles Joseph Hefele, 1896, vol. 5, pp. 234-235, “THE QUINISEXT OR TRULLAN SYNOD, A.D. 692,” Canon 88:

You know, no one really said there’d be no problems trying to organize Christianity.

 

http://www.angelfire.com/alt/scm/pedalion.html, The Pedalion or Rudder: THE 85 CANONS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES (2nd-4th century, but some canons originally supposed to be by St. Peter and the other Apostles):

CANON 83
If any Bishop, or Presbyter, or Deacon is engaged in military matters, and wishes to hold both a Roman (i.e., civil) and a sacerdotal office, let him be deposed. For "render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s" (Matt.. 22:21).

CANON 84
If anyone insults an emperor or king, or any other ruler, contrary to what is right and just, let him pay the penalty. Accordingly, if he is a clergyman, let him be deposed; But if he is a layman, let him be excommunicated.

So you have one here that George doesn’t like and another one that George likes.

 

The best antiwar method to inform the President about the ills of violence:

She bop--he bop--a--we bop
I bop--you bop--a--they bop
Be bop--be bop--a--lu--she bop,
I hope he will understand

 

Some don’t want Freedom:

“If you could only see the way she loves me, then maybe you would understand, why I feel this way about our love, and what I must do. If you could only see how blue her eyes can be when she says: when she says she loves me.” –Tonic, 1997.  That’s “lust” not love.

 

“Well, if you wanna own a great big mansion. Well I’ll give it my utmost attention. I’ll buy you Tall Tall Trees and all the waters in the seas: I’m a fool fool fool for you. Well I’m a fool over you – it may take a while but I'll prove it’s true. Well if it’s lovin’ you want I’ve got it. If it’s money you want I’ll get it. I’ll buy you Tall Tall Trees and all the waters in the seas I’m a fool fool fool for you.” –George Jones, 1958.  Yeah, it’s the Goldenrule man, but it’s more of a one sided Goldenrule, since sex is really the other side’s only obligation.  And the Bible definitely puts down prostitution, especially if it’s dishonest prostitution – which just breaks another commandment.  Plus, it’s too much Goldenrule for one, and Jesus says the Goldenrule should be spread more evenly between “one another.”  If folks were smart enough to just read the Bible, instead of letting mainstream brainwash and corruptions determine what it says, then it oughta be a better world.

 

This is probably way too much for you all:

Luke 20:34-36:

³⁴Jesus answered and said to them, “The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage. ³⁵But those who are counted worthy to attain that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry(verb in the active present tense) nor are given in marriage; ³⁶nor can they die anymore, for they are equal to the angels and are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.”

So “Jesus” is saying that only single people today can attain the resurrection.  The original Greek verbs “γαμουσιν” for “marry” (both) are in the active present tense, not the available future tense.  I’d say that’s quit a turn from what we’ve been taught and adamantly believe.  It’s just nice to have more proof from Jesus how dumb and gullible you all are.  Nope, it doesn’t say you can’t have sex outside of marriage.  If it did, and everyone in the world did want Jesus expects (which would be the goal), then mankind would end because no one would be able to have sex.  Now, that apparently takes a very, very, very high I.Q. to understand.  It’d be a much better world if everyone was as smart as me.

 

“I feel the weight of the world on my shoulder
As I’m getting older, ya’ll people gets colder
Most of us only care about money makin’

Selfishness got us following the wrong direction
Wrong information always shown by the media
Negative images is the main criteria
Infecting the young minds faster then bacteria
Kids want to act like what they see in the cinema
What ever happened to the values of humanity?
Whatever happened to the fairness in equality?
Instead of spreading love we spreading animosity
Lack of understanding leading us away from unity
That’s the reason why sometimes I’m feeling under
That’s the reason why sometimes I’m feeling down
It’s no wonder why sometimes I’m feeling under
Gotta keep my faith alive till love is found

…

Father, father, father help us
Send some guidance from above
Cause people got me, got me questioning
Where is the love?”

–Black Eyed Peas, featuring Justin Timberlake, 2003.

It’s stuck inside the dishonest prostitution (marriage) standard.  Therefore, the answer’s in the New Testament, it’s just not in the church.  And, if there was more sex between races, there’d be less discrimination.

 

Also see Matt. 19:10-12.  Since Jesus denounces “marriage” then it is much more holy to have sex outside of marriage.  That means that babies / “bastards” born out of wedlock are far more holy than babies born in wedlock.  But I’m smart enough to know that all of you are far too dumb and gullible to even consider that.  You’d have to be able to trust the Bible more than you trust those who you greatly pay to be honest.  This realization is what is called the Apocolypse.  Revelations says it’s going to happen, so that’s probably the only reason I write; because, “I” really feel I might as well be talking to cats.  So, at least one person (me) is trusting the Bible over today’s irrational church explanations.

 

To marry is to “jump off the deep end,” “put the clamps on,” “snap on the ol’ ball and chain,” “take the plunge,” “tie down.”

 

Lawrence, Kansas:

…by 07-07-07.

 

Concerning keeping our boys in Iraq instead of just restitution:

♪♫ “All we are saying, is give war a chance.”♪♫  –Conservatives.

 

Inside information about the Iraq war:

Get it?  He’s saving face.  Ha Ha Ha Haaa.

 

Hannity censures John Edwards for being a “hypocite”:

Poor people really don’t have a big voice.  So when a rich person like John Edwards speaks on their behalf, it is quit an accomplishment.  Hannity calls Edwards a “hypocrite” for having a big house and money while advocating the poor.  But, if Edwards gave away all his riches, he would have no more voice for the poor.  Hannity’s analysis “sounds” good, so many people will believe it, but best explained in the word “dumb.”  Hannity’s concern “for” the poor would be having them work double shifts just to meet basic needs.  That way a poor person’s life is optimized for the rich.  (Same with Clintons’.)  Hannity and his like are excellent example of Antichrists.  I say poor people “need” more rich “hypocrites” to come to their rescue.  Even struggling newspapers who have very little money don’t really support the poor enough, simply because they know if they want to sell more newspapers they’d better say want the selfish rich want to hear.  Churches can sometimes even preach real red letter teachings of Jesus, but they know at the end they’d better add a cop-out like Jesus paid their penalties to allow the wealthy members to overrule Jesus’ real instructions, or no more money for the church.

 

Finally, there’s someone who agrees with me:

“Everybody knows that the world is full of stupid people.” –The Refreshments, 1996.  Sounds like they must have had news media back in 1996.  Quite refreshing knowing someone else was aware of our media’s Fizzy, Fuzzy, Big & Buzzy reporting on Iraq.

 

Daily Kos:

“Proof that at least 19% of Americans are total idiots” –http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/6/9/173437/0179.  And 100% are easily brainwashed, when a church decides to say that God / Jesus was against sex outside of marriage.  Even if you’re an atheist, you believe that “if” there’s a Christian God, He’s against sex outside of marriage.

 

A Dictionary of the English Language, Samuel Johnson, 1755, no page numbers, “STUPID”:

 

Sing about it:

“War, killing sons and daughters. Another failed attack, there is no turning back. Blood, running down like water. You think you got away, until the judgment. You think you got away, until your judgment day comes.” –Ozzy Osbourne, 2007.

Boy, I couldn’t say it better.  Right George?  You think you got away with it, don’t you?  Otherwise, you’d be using your resources to be makin’ some fast restitution.  Which also includes no American soldier killing any more Iraqis.  Even if total peace in Iraq came today, there’s still the past that you will have to pay for.  By George, I didn’t know Ozzy had so much in common with the Jesus in the Bible.  I bet the cherry-pickin’ Protestants didn’t know that.

 

Someone should tell Mike Gallagher that if two-thirds of the country thinks the Iraq war was a mistake, then that definitely, definitely means we are the bad guys, via truthful logic and the majority of the bad guys’ opinion – which may be a first in history.

 

What’s this stuff about President Bush criticizing Castro for putting radicals in jail for speaking treason against his government?  I bet half our prison population is really Americans who exercised Freedom of Speech.  The U.S. government will definitely blacklist anyone who says what they don’t like, unless they’re someone big in the media.  Social Security will even not pay money they owe for those blacklisted for Freedom of Speech.  They’ll search hard to find any technicality they can get.  That’s why I always buckle my seat belt and always use my turn signals.

 

The idea that we are in Iraq to help the people of Iraq is B.S. proved by the years of economic sanctions we imposed against them.  We haven’t changed one bit: we talk real big about helping the people of Cuba, yet we have economic sanctions against them also.  So we’re a long way from being the “good guys.”

 

Attention conservative Wall Street guru Neil Cavuto:

Hey, I’ve got lots of money just lying around in this house.  I respect your expertise.  So please email me and give me your inside information of exactly where to stick it.  That’s right, I need to know where I should shove it.  Thanks.

 

The police:

I think the police, their procedures, their training, etc., would be a great thing to have in a society where “hurting an innocent person” would be the only thing the law mandates.  Plus, somehow we should find a way to eliminated bias, where penalties apply equally to the same degrees of violations of hurting an innocent person.  Laws where the only possible victim is oneself, sufficient counseling, education, documentaries with examples, etc. should be provided.  Maybe in some place like a school, where like “Driver’s Ed.” could return as a course.

 

National Museum of Iraq:

George’s Iraq invasion, instead of giving Saddam Hussein a safe and happy travel itinerary, caused 15,000 Mesopotamian artifacts to be stolen from the museum.  Only 4,000 have been recovered to date.  Mesopotamia is the oldest major civilized human culture that existed.  Older that the Romans, the Greeks, and the Egyptians.  God will be glad to see President Bush go.  George and media leaders will be paying for this major sin against mankind for a long time.

 

Windows Vista:

Could be that we now just have stuff which is just designed to antiquate our old reliable programs, instead of giving us the updates that everyone really wants / needs, is because President Bush “just” dismissed the government’s case against Microsoft, when he took office.  I think God will be glad to see President Bush go.  You Republicans remember that when something doesn’t work anymore on your computer.

 

We need a President that will just force everyone in the country to just give Microsoft say $10 a year (about three billion dollars).  That will keep them in business (with pride), but the only change will be: they have to make software that doesn’t antiquate our old reliable problems, with free utilities that fixes things / restores, better customization abilities, and that adds functionalities that we can all use (especially with the Find command, more clipboards, continuous automatic Saves, viewing Word documents without having to click “No” after prompted if I wish to save, everytime I close the document THAT I DIDN’T MAKE ANY CHANGES TO, etc.), instead of trying to just destroy all that computers have been, just to make people have to spend more money.  I’d save us a lot of money.

 

And the next time someone develops an advance technology, instead of having them release it every two years in small increments just to take more money from the consumer each year, and cause more waste (especially in time and progress for Mankind), let’s just give their executives several billion dollars each.  Then the consumer can save lots more money.  Otherwise, it will probably take 100,000 years to do what we could achieve in just 1,000 years.

 

The dishonest prostitution standard (monogamy / marriage):

Unless it is explained to them correctly, “dishonest prostitution” means people aren’t aware that the marriage / monogamy standard is just a mainstream accepted, organized form of prostitution (sex for conditions).  Even today’s “independent” women still like having the sexual control of men.  They may not be admittedly aware of it, but they like having men do things for them, just to be mean if nothing else:  By default, everyone still enjoys having someone else work for them, or just suffer by not being able to be with other women, etc. just for the female’s selfish enjoyment.  Many “independent” women just never have anything to do with a man, just to make them all suffer by not letting any have them.  There’s a load of false beliefs and cop-outs in today’s women’s minds to justify all their one-sided evil; that a man, like me, had better never cause logic to uncover – hence the “dishonest” part of “dishonest prostitution.”  I think the only women who go to those swinger parties allowing their husbands to have sex with other women, are either lesbians or on drugs: where their mind loses its instinct for the selfish sex game and dishonest societal standards.  That’s an example of the power of sex.  (Now, let’s find another man that can explain it better.)

 

I don’t know how they got women to participate in free love back in the 1960s.  It must have not worked very well.  Probably it will have to be an ethical / religious solution.  So the atheists aren’t even close in solving the problem.  But, hey, when do I get to visit that “fantasy” “gang bang” room at the Cherry Pit, that I saw on The O’Reilly Factor?  Having sex with other men’s beautiful wives is all fun and dandy, but what if I want to take one out to play billiards?

 

Cop-outs and saving face versus Fair Afterlife Punishment:

Folks who are Christian, who feel they must save face when in “error,” are so stupid they think they’re smarter than God; thereby fooling God into thinking they were right on the issue; thereby circumventing Fair Afterlife Punishment.  But, if God’s as smart as me, then I think God already knows about their “error,” and moreover even their saving face cop-out, and will therefore face Fair Afterlife Punishment even more severely.  But, in this world, it’s very easy to make oneself feel better when one concludes a face saving cop-out, ignoring the considerations of the innocent people one hurt / murdered.  That’s just the way it is, therefore is reason paramount that God implement Fair Afterlife Punishment, or the reason for God’s help is null.  That’s the only possible way to combat it.  E.g., if all the innocent Iraqis who we’ve murdered were somehow still alive, then we’d have many times more problems in Iraq today than we presently do.  So, killing innocent victims has many advantages in this life; but, in our Afterlife, all things will be taken into account.  If I was a typical Christian power person, I’d pray hard that Jesus in the Bible was incorrect.

 

Tell me how I’m wrong:

I love it when I get to admit my errors.

 

We think we’re the smartest:

If we could judge everything on logic instead of emotion, and could naturally reckon right from wrong on our own, no more favoritism, where eye for eye, tooth for tooth could be the standard, instead of Jesus’ necessity to later tell us to just “forgive” all others, then we would be one of God’s greatest creations… from another planet.

 

Westroads Mall, Omaha random shooting:

I just betcha the troubled shooter, Robert Hawkins, didn’t believe in the teachings or the logic of any kind of Fair Afterlife Punishment for killing “innocent” people.  I betcha he’s just been taught that “God” can make your life wonderful, and/or that you’re going to Hell if you’re having sex outside of marriage, or take drugs. – All the things that are “intended” to make the rich get richer, while kicking the poor when they’re down.  Someone should have advised Hawkins about the conclusive specific rationale of the first “Important Master Statements” on my website; which I’ve noticed is nowhere else to be found.  Oh, how wonderful my writings really are.  Mark Fuhrman said there’s no way to figure why these people kill like this; but, I’ve found that many people think it’s alright to kill “innocent” people whenever they think it’s to their advantage, which can include wanting to become “famous” and “go out like a star” via their suicide.  Anyone who sees any advantage for war feels killing innocent people is justified.  But, would not kill any of their loved-ones for the same purpose.  I just love always being right.  And being reminded that every time I watch the news.  Hannity would say that when I quote the incorrect amount of deaths attributed to WWII, that just proves everything else I say is hogwash.  The only reason the government monitors me is because my stuff cannot be stereotyped.  So, they draw conclusions based on similar stereotypes, and assume the worst.  But, no, I’m everyone’s best friend in the entire world.  You’re just going to hear why; and, you’re not going to like it if you are truly evil.  But, you will wish you did like it, if you continue to do your evil, after you find just that much more fair Punishment waiting for you in your Afterlife.  That’s right, I’ll be wrong if you never eventually wish you liked me.

 

“Never hurt an innocent person” is simply the logic which validates why someone would have something legitimate against you, in Matt. 5: 23-26, which “assuredly” leads to fair retribution.  You see, the guy who has something against you for throwing him in jail for robbing a bank, logically has an invalid / unjustified reason.  Apparently the average person is not going to realize this, until someone explains it to them.  If there’s a God.  A God that can’t “just” make everyone not sin.  Where self desire for evil, not logic, is saying that God can do anything, and hates sin, but won’t “just” make us all not sin.  These ridiculous contradictions is just what causes higher, but far from perfect, thinkers to “just” not believe in God.  Strangely, the universal Goldenrule is included in the teachings of all major religions, by atheists, and even by our government.  So what cop-outs and/or contradictions is it that’s not making it work?

 

“A staff member at a group home where Hawkins had lived for a while said the youth was a target of teasing.”  “He was always picked on,” said a friend.  I think it’s that the Goldenrule is there, but is not getting taught correctly, especially concerning religious consequences.  But, that’s the result when all the wealthy only want to hear cop-outs.  When the rich only want to hear the cop-outs, and since the rich have more money to pay for what gets said in the mainstream, it just fully explains why things like this happen.

 

Understand this, Mr. Goldenrule hypocrite: The wealthy don’t like the burdens that Jesus placed on them in the Bible, so cop-outs make a lot of sinners feel better, so they can have the “freedom” (man) to do as they wish.  So, try to “treat others like you would want to be treated,” if you were wealthy!  Plus, you’re never going to get any media to support your Bible Jesus, the way you try to find fault in everybody!  Surely a true perfect thinker would realize that some people, of high position, simply have no faults at all.  And all true Bible scholars are aware that God would not want His instruction in “one word,” or the Bible wouldn’t be a “book” of many jumbled up words and stories.

 

I say, jumbled up words apparently makes a jumbled up world, full of faults, like Muslims who want to kill a school teacher for naming a teddy bear Mohammad.  Like Protestants who “choose” to follow Paul’s “concessions,” mistakes and speculations, rather than Jesus’ die-hard instructions.  Like Jews who feel a dire need to worship a wall (even to the expense of causing WWIII).  I say make the Goldenrule name the Word of God, and just keep the Bible as something / commentary leading up to it.  Also, disseminate my website as the more correct and precise commentary, unless someone can show an error, or where anything is lacking (concerning its relations and fitting into the Goldernrule).  Then I’ll be glad to change it.  Paul actually said in 1 Corinthians 7:40 “according to my judgment—and I think I also have the Spirit of God,” meaning that he doesn’t know for sure, and is “covering himself” by stating such.  “Jesus” is the voice of God.  Commentary from Paul and the Disciples should all be taken with a grain of salt.  When Jesus contradicts the Old Testament, then what Jesus said overrules.  When Paul or the Disciples contradict / overrule Jesus (e.g., 1 Corinthians 7), then what Jesus said overrules.

 

–Like Catholics that fabricate a “confession” of sins, to ease the minds of sinners, “needed” because of the Church’s fabrications of victimless sins that are outside of (don’t violate) the Goldenrule, like “sexual desire” period, that is easily violated by just about everyone.  Whereas “Never hurting an innocent person” is really pretty easy to accomplish – at least it’s easy for me to accomplish.  All my enemies of the past twenty years are simply because I don’t get down on my knees for them – absolutely no other reason!  And America is definitely a society that expects people of lower ranks or regard to slaver, just for self pride reasons.  I.e., a better functioning hierarchy is one where the “lesser” / employee / laborer is really the one that doesn’t “have to” come into work.  But does because the “higher” / boss is paying him “more.”  Or I should say, the boss should be more getting down on his knees to get the worker to come to work.  As long as the employee can be the one who can afford three cruses a year, he’ll keep coming in, I assure you.  Then, we’ll all be worrying about how to get employees to quite wanting to always work double shifts.  Like truckers who’ll be wanting to drive too many hours.  Etc.  Plus, with my current mouth adding criticism (for the past ten years), telling everyone about their faults, I’ve rounded up a list of enemies that spans the entire country.  If I didn’t think I was working for God, I simply wouldn’t do it.  But, God comes first, me second.  I think the only reason I haven’t been martyred (yet) is because my riffle-raffle “fits.”  People just don’t want to hear it: the truth burns.  Or, they think they heard it all before, specifically the Golden Rule; therefore, ending the cop-outs is where I should prioritize.  But, then I do.  So, we have to go back to “burns.”  So my rock is those who seek goodness, who have already heard about the Golden Rule, but are unaware of, or don’t really understand or figure, all the hidden cop-outs; and my hard place is those who are evil, who “burn” when I reveal their hidden cop-outs.  So everyone is either good but dumb, or evil and therefore ignoring me (or a combination like O’Reilly).  I guess if one’s subconscious can figure the hidden cop-outs, then he practices the hidden cop-outs; but, if one’s subconscious is too stupid to figure the hidden cop-outs, then he doesn’t understand that they are real or exist in others’ minds either, nor that they are the key to finding the goodness they seek.  Or, the vacillation / spin of these two points in the minds of guys like O’Reilly.  That’s called “Lying to oneself.”  Simply stated, the Protestant Church is the perfect Antichrist.  There are no statements that could hide it better.  One has to have an extremely high I.Q. to understand it.  Catholic’s verbal “confession” can cause a tremendous amount of allowed sinning (real sin), but saying that Jesus paid all penalties accomplishes the most sin.  Where dumb animal emotions and the limitations of the secular justice system is the only way to stop sin – so we might as well all be atheists, where doing it is only determined by if you think you can get away with it (secularly).

 

“I don’t want to work: I want to bang on the drum all day” –Todd Rundgren, 1983:

It’d get old.  Especially when you feel it’s time for something “more.”  Unless you’re an imbecile who shouldn’t be working in the first place.  Like the idiot who rear-ended me a few years ago, whose driving record showed a score of accidents – he wouldn’t have had to be driving if he didn’t have to work.

 

Understand why most Americans don’t like their Freedom being violated by major ice storms, where they are imprisoned from leaving their home to go to work because of very icy road conditions.  There is a reason most would rather be at work than “bang on the drum all day,” which has something to do with the word “more.”  Now, kids like snow days simply because it is kind of hard to realize how going to school is getting them “more.”  But, they’ll work like the dickens when they get a job at 16, simply because it’s clearly “more.”

 

Working just so “ends meet,” versus working to get “ahead”:

Has anyone ever done a survey where homeless people are housed and fed for free, with no time limit and where they don’t “have to” leave at anytime; where a bus comes and picks up in the morning whoever want to go to work if they wish to make money.  Don’t tell me that no one would get on the bus for “more.”  Sure, there’d be “a reason” why some wouldn’t (e.g., bad health, mental problems, etc.), but most would.  Maybe have several buses where each bus goes to a variety of difficulties in jobs, where the harder jobs pay “more.”  Then let me know why we’re getting all those difficult jobs done, that nobody today wants to do.  If such would be the case, then our government could provide free housing, utilities and food stamps to everyone, and the vast majority would still work.  It could also pay for moms to raise their kids and/or pay for daycare if the mom wants to work, so we could drop the marriage standard.  As long as the vast majority worked, the government could simply print money for this at no cost to the taxpayer (just like how our successful but fabricated money system backed by banking loans works).  And if you work, you could afford a bigger or better house, as by doing so, the government would pay you the difference that the free housing costs.  That’s incentive to get ahead.  The only way it would crash is if not enough people were willing to work for “more.”  But, why wouldn’t anyone want to work for “more”?  High school kids do it when living with their parents.  Plus, if we could somehow rid interest paid to people who just “have” money, then the people who “work” would respectively get that much more – therefore “more” of an incentive.  And if the homeless / underachieved people would work for “more” then getting the rest to work for “more” would be a cinch.  It may be good at first to retain people who live off their interest, because their purchase of fluff will create more jobs (Reagan economics).  But, eventually those who do the work only should be the ones getting all that fluff.  Since a rich people who doesn’t work wants nothing but fluff, then maybe a poor person who doesn’t have to work will also want it more, making them get on the bus more often to get it.  Once everyone in the world is working for fluff, then I’d assume all the needed things would already be done.

 

Today’s government wants workers to make less, thereby keeping them motivated to work as much and as long as possible, just to make ends meet, so there will be more for the rich. – If people could retire earlier, or not have to work double shifts, then there’s less for the rich.  The interest paid to people who just have extra money on 30-year mortgages in phenomenal, and down right unfair.  The Bible says to not loan with interest.  Yeah, I know it’s worse (more unfair) in lots of other countries.  It’s obvious why low paid workers don’t want to ever work again once retired – because what the got for the price simply wasn’t worth it.  There’s two ways to motivate people to work: pain or goal.  Horses that are whipped in pain at the race track run fast as they can.  But also dogs that are running for a goal run just as hard.  A guy running from the cops, will likely wear out faster adding in the painful stress; while a guy running to his new bride will run much happier and less stressfully.  Happiness is mankind’s true goal, but church cop-outs of the Goldenrule make it very unfairly balanced against those who really deserve.  So I think the future should convert to goal motivation, where today’s pain motivation will only be in our history books – right next to the slavery issue.  Then, opportunity will be the key to getting things done: making the bus available for those who want “more.”   Then people’s complaint will be that there are not enough very difficult and very dangerous jobs available anymore, where one can become the most wealthiest.

 

I’m just saying these guys more deserve the biggest house, the nicest car, and the three cruises a year.

 

Another great motivator for progress would be for the government to pay kids for going to school and college.  Then the kids could afford their own toys, especially in cases where the parents can’t afford them.  That should add a tremendous amount of enthusiasm for learning.  (Did you ever know a kid who didn’t want “more” toys?)  Then future jobs, that will pay more, will have much more skilled and knowledgeable workers, opposed to the many knowledge limitations workers seem to have today.

 

Plus, if the government is in charge of the building of all houses, then they will make sure homes aren’t built in flood zones; the ground is packed down with a soil compactor roller so basements, porches, driveways, etc. won’t sink and crack in the future; etc. – which many developers today tend to ignore.  Today, if a naive home buyer doesn’t obviously see it, likely it isn’t done or done right.

 

All I am saying is that food and housing should be free, but if you want one Easy Expressions Hands-Free Pumping Bra you should have to work to deserve it:

 

“Liberated” women:

Today, all the single women say they want to be “independent” and not demanding of a man, but I’ve found they all want to be taken care of, and they definitely want to be demanding of their man.

 

However:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_birds_and_the_bees, “The birds and the bees”:

According to that story the birds are like men and the bees like women: Birds are free to fly wherever they like, but bees are enslaved to a single queen their entire life and their whole life is dedicated to keeping her alive.

“Dumb”: it sticks.

 

Proportionately:

“I don’t want you, cook my bread. I don’t want you, make my bed. I don’t want your money too. I Just Want To Make Love To You.  I don’t want you, be no slave. I don’t want you, work all day. I don’t want you to be sad and blue. I Just Want To Make Love To You. … I don’t want you, wash my clothes. I don’t want you, keep a home. I don’t want you to be true. I Just Want To Make Love To You.” –Foghat, 1972.

Is that what you’d call an “independent” male?

 

Married versus single workers:

I think married workers work better for a company than single workers do, because the single life in this society is more stressful / chaotic: has more extreme ups and downs, where married life is more mediocre, ordinary, and society accepted.  If this was a free/open sex society (with diversity in partners), then single life would exceed worker enthusiasm lots more than would a non-free / controlled monogamous relationship.  A troubled marriage can also hurt employment.  “Getting laid” probably has most to do with it.  “Getting laid” with a more “diverse” appeal, allowing the satisfactions of natural desire, will cause worker motivation to excel.  I know, no one is able to conceive this, until someday where we will have to surely learn the hard way (where hardly anyone is married, and the church is still condemning sex out of marriage, where anger and uncontentment will be abundant, and strongly affecting worker enthusiasm.)

 

Olathe, Kansas:

…after Al Gore’s oceans rise.

 

Church security fails to pardon sinner for past, present and future sins:

Pastor figures 50-100 more parishioners would have been shot if Jeanne Assam didn’t “engage” against Matthew Murray at New Life Church in Colorado Springs.  But Church likely teaches that God will pardon everyone else’s past, present and future sins.  But, if they’re wrong, for some reason, I seem to be the only one who believes God can only implement punishment in everyone’s afterlife, since God didn’t stop Murray from part of his shooting spree.  Ditto the above Omaha shooting for the rest of what I should say about this; e.g., “I just betcha the troubled shooter, [Matthew Murray], didn’t believe in the teachings or the logic of any kind of Fair Afterlife Punishment for killing ‘innocent’ people.  I betcha he’s just been taught that ‘God’ can make your life wonderful …”

 

Yeah, I’z right:

http://www.newlifechurch.org/beliefs.jsp, What We Believe, “Statement of Faith”:

Jesus’ Blood: The blood that Jesus Christ shed on the cross of Calvary was sinless and is 100 percent sufficient to cleanse humankind from all sin. Jesus allowed Himself to be punished for both our sinfulness and our sins, enabling all those who believe to be free from the penalty of sin, which is death (see John 1:29; Rom. 3:10-12,23; 5:9; Col. 1:20; 1 John 1:7; Rev. 1:5; 5:9).

There’s the little part that all the wealthy sinners love hearing.  I wonder if Murray thought God lied to him when he felt a little of the penalty.  If I was a killer, I would definitely like believing that God pardons “all those who believe to be free from the penalty of sin.”  I mean really: who’s the big imbecile, me or all of you?  Then we actually wonder why there’s crime, wars, complaints from poor people, complaints from middle class people, complains from the worst of the worst of rich people, faulty products, corruption, lousy sex lives, lousy “love” lives, few healthy dinners, etc.

 

(I don’t see red letters in any of the above cited passages.  Contrarily, the red letters of Jesus definitely say all sinners will justly suffer.  So, I can positively discern that “I” am a follower of “Jesus” and they are all not.  [But, how come I have to be such a smart aleck about it?])

 

Gunman Murray stated that churches are the cause of today’s world problems:

I’d say that is correct, but violence is not the solution.  Let my website address the problem.  Only “my” website has the only written answer.  Much more can be accomplished with the pen instead of the sword.  As you can see it is working very well.  If my / God’s Goldenrule.name became a household word, then it would be done.

 

Christian “morals”:

Today, when someone says he has Christian morals, it means he doesn’t have sex outside of marriage, expects the same for everyone else, and is very bias for members of his own family who are having conflict with others.  So, Jesus’ Goldenrule has been turned totally upside-down.  Well, at least “Christian morals” doesn’t necessarily mean he will join the military, so there’s still “some” good.

 

It could cost you your life:

Churches’ sex taboo is so taboo that U.S. soldiers aren’t allowed to search Iraqi women (through check points, etc.) who possibly could be terrorists.  So even U.S. soldiers have to stay more in harms way to satisfy our dishonest church standards.

 

Be careful who you vote for: You may be adding Fair Afterlife Punishment to your credit:

For example: If you voted for George W. Bush in 2000, you’re really not responsible for the innocent people he’s killed.  But, if you voted for George W. Bush in 2004, it depends: If you live kind of an isolated life, and think we killed and hurt only bad guys in the Iraq war, then my guess is you don’t have anything to worry about; but, if you were watching the news telling about our blasting that restaurant, or any other operation that hurt innocent people, and you voted for George in 2004, then you’re probably in trouble.  In 2008, if you vote for someone that you know would be willing to kill innocent people in a military, etc. operation, then you’re probably in trouble there as well.  So be careful!  Don’t give the Devil what he wants.  Understanding the realization that even any Iraqi military or insurgents or even al-Qaeda that we killed during this 2003 war were / are innocent, is something your I.Q. is unable to comprehend on its own.  But, for those who have read my rational logic, and you still support “defending” ourselves during our presence in Iraq, you’re probably in trouble.  The experts said al-Qaeda was not set up in Iraq prior to our evasion.  Saddam Hussein, who definitely had reason to not like us, apparently would halt anyone who wanted a safe haven to set up terroristic operations against the United States, obviously because he didn’t want to actually give us a reason to bomb him again.  And, it’s like if the Soviet Union violently took over, say Mexico, not just to remove one man but actually to overthrow the government, our military and militias would probably be down there helping getting them out of their country also.  So, technically there’s absolutely no ethical difference between al-Qaeda and our military.  None!  But, we thing there is.  “Dumb”: everyone is.  Except for – not just trying to be conceited, but – except for me.  Just being factual.  PLEASE, TELL ME HOW I’M WRONG, you wonderfully perfect thinking, “good” people!  Even when they brought down the towers, try to explain to me the ethical difference in that and the Amiriyah civilian shelter or the al-Saa restaurant, etc.?  All I hear is what some of those well uniformed imbeciles say on Fox News, like Ted Nugent, the Beltway Boys, and others.  So, since I’m against al-Qaeda, I’m against the U.S. Military too.

 

Plus, all you church goin’ “good” people, please find it as your heart and duty to Jesus to inform me of the difference between Saddam Hussein’s or anyone’s mass genocide targeting civilians, and Harry Truman’s dropping of the atomic bombs?  I’m just not as smart as you all to be able to tell the difference.

 

Iraq and North Korea:

Concisely, our biggest fear is if they are as evil, selfish and controlling as we are.

 

I want to talk about me:

You mean no media would like to have a story or show talking about real facts and real solutions?

 

2-7-08: Romney says kids need a dad around:

Again, nobody really cares if dads are with their kids: authorities just want him around for financial support, that’s all.  Divorce courts’ priority is “child support”: allowing visitation is really secondary: If dad doesn’t pay the child support, then dad doesn’t see the kids.  Some courts push for fathers to see their kids often, but just because fathers who see their kids more tend to pay the child support better or more timely.  I’m sure judges have to weigh in all variables to conclude with an action they think gets the most financial support only.  And a dad that’s still happily married to, and living with, the kid’s mother is the best for getting his financial support.  Oh, I forgot to mention that when a father doesn’t pay the child support, the state usually has to.  So it all has to do with “money,” not for quality time between father and son.  In the status-quo, if divorced fathers visiting their kids is so important, and since many fathers who don’t pay child support avoid their children to lessen their sense of shame and degradation, shouldn’t society do their part and not require child support at all?  The worst of it all is when people who look like they know what they’re talking about (politicians) tell kids that they “need” their dad around.  Then when, for whatever reason, dad doesn’t come around, the kid will lean towards drugs, crime, gangs and/or suicide, because he “thinks” (been informed) he’s such a victim, when he’s really not.  The multitude of today’s divorces makes it hard anyway to establish Mitt Romney’s perfect family ideal.  Keeping HIV/STD cures hidden helps but not near enough according to today’s high percentage of children born out of wedlock, according to Mitt Romney.  I suggest taking all birth control (including the condom) off the market, to be your last and only try; and fabricate another fatal STD.  Just go to your local Catholic or Mormon church to learn all about the horrible evils of sex outside of wedlock, for moral support.

 

Encyclopedic Dictionary of Religion, 1979, vol. ?, p. 3273, “SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE”:

 

Of course, mainstream bigots are kind of between a rock and a hard place concerning birth control: (1) Birth control causes more extra marital sex, thereby breaking up more families, thereby causing more welfare needed to be paid to divorced or single mothers, but (2) Birth control lessens unwanted pregnancies, thereby lessening eventual welfare.  So, lessening unwanted pregnancies must really be ahead, or mainstream bigots (Republican or Democrat) would halt birth control.

 

Downtown Olathe, Kansas:

…hopefully never.

 

If the government feels that parents should spend more time with their kids, then why does the Clinton welfare solution force more moms to get jobs?  I’ve directly heard social workers tell mothers they “need” to get two jobs, with children that are already out of control.

 

Deep thoughts:

200 years ago: was it easier for someone to walk out without paying their meal ticket, when visiting the outdoor privies?

 

http://folsomstreetfair.org/documents/2007_Official_Folsom_Street_Fair_Guide.pdf, Folsom Street Fair (on sexual freedom):

Attention gay guys: the Last Supper was not on a table, the Last Supper was on a sexually suggestive sigma couch.  Plus, all those whips and chains just prove you’re all screwed up.  If you’d have hit Homo Erectus with a whip while having sex with him, he surely wouldn’t have liked it.  Sex approved by God is the only best way.  This just proves there’s no stability without God.  This just proves there’s no stability without my website.  This just proves the future of this planet will be very bleak if my website doesn’t get disseminated.  Whips and chains do not represent “love.”  And I’ll tell you: Sean Hannity isn’t going to disseminate my stuff either.

 

S&M is only desirous for analyzation reasons: An awareness that sexual stimulation is so powerful that even physical pain cannot exceed it.  It’s “fun” exceeding that threshold.  It’s “fun” knowing that there’s something that can rule over the condemnative suffering that the false Church places on you.  It lets you know that there’s “something” that can overrule pain, suffering and depression.  It’s just knowledge of something “I” (only) can tell you about.  Therefore, I don’t recommend playing with S&M.  It’s not the way God meant it to be.  One can get hurt.  Let the desire to please the partner instead of hurting the partner be the goal.  The deprivation of sexual love (marriage) deserves three entire chapter (17,18,19) in the book of Revelation devoted to its destruction.  And one chapter (12) devoted to explaining the evil of the best example of it hurting an “innocent” person: something that gives a condemning name to a totally “innocent” newborn baby, like the word “bastard.”  (What good Church would do that?  A very “dumb” one.  That’s the most “accurate” word to choose.)  Once the facts get disseminated, then people will be able to please more that just their spouse.  That wish to please more than just one’s spouse, could lead to a whole new kind of world.  If folks like pleasing others as much as they now wish to please their spouses, then they’ll start figuring on other ways to please others, then eventually we’re talking about a lot of things going on that’s pleasing everyone.  So sex is the “key” to creating an eventual Goldenrule world.  Unless Hannity can sell the American people into bombing Iran, of course.

 

Did Jesus really exist?:

To paraphrase: The four Gospels appear they were compiled via different people’s recollections, rather than totally fabricated.  If the Jesus story was totally fabricated, they probably wouldn’t fabricate four different versions of it: adding parts to some while leaving out parts in others.  I don’t understand why the big Catholic fuss concerning evidence about Jesus’ fulfillments (accomplishments / completions) being also deriving from pagan religions, as well as from the Old Testament.  I mean the Jews rejected Jesus, so it just makes sense that Paul needed something to recruit the pagan gentiles, who became the bulk of early Christianity.  Wouldn’t the one God be also the (real) God of the pagans?

 

It still has to do with “gold”:

–But that’s just because of dumbness.  Today’s warmongers are still generally the more wealthy people, simply because when someone takes over a country, it usually means “change” and overall “change” usually means more “taking from the rich and giving to the poor.”  So rich people want their young to die in the battlefield so they can keep all their gold.  Whereas, the poor know that nothing too much is going to change for them if just someone else is in charge of the cops.  Today, there are a lot more wealthy people who are aware that today’s wars aren’t going to cause them to lose their fortunes so they don’t really see a big need to have them.  If anything, they’re realizing that having wars (just for pride purposes) just costs them more money.  They know that nobody’s going to physically take over the U.S. government, and the freedom system, but some are starting to realize that all of our wars for “just pride” will just cause more terrorist activity against them.  Guys like Hannity are so dumb that they actually think the other side will like us after we bomb them.

 

To update what Jesus wants us to do:

It’s cool to not seek revenge.

It’s cool to give to all who ask, even when they are deceitful.

It’s cool to be impartial (but practically impossible).

It’s cool to admit when you’re wrong.

It’s cool to side with the goal of being more considerate to others.

 

In other words, we are uncool when we’re normal.

 

Slant drilling and the Amiriyah civilian shelter:

If Hitler didn’t publicize his killing of Jews, that would just make him like the typical American; since we don’t publicize slant drilling or the Amiriyah civilian shelter either.  I think the only reason I heard about the destruction of the Amiriyah civilian shelter that one time, late at night on CNN, was because we were bragging how we blew up something (via “technique”) that the Iraqis claimed could withstand even a nuclear explosion.  I think Adolf Hitler would have fired CNN for even that small of a “leak,” because I’ve got it now, where Giuliani and Ted Nugent seem to not.  Normally the American media is so unfair and unbalanced that a U.S. President could actually also be unaware of major prior relevancies.  Go ahead and tell about the other side’s story, just so we can all more easily see how most Americans could still care less, especially the Hannity types.  Keeping the real sentiment of the Hannity types hidden, where they can continue to act like they’re for what’s right and fair, will just cause the U.S. more problems in the future; and, if there’s an eventual end-of-the-world war, surely the Hannity types will be the root cause.  I say trash ‘em; you say trash ‘em; but, you are probably one of them.

 

Christmas time:

Fox News stated that the (2007) year’s worst of the worst (“worse than naughty”) is those who say that our military is killing civilians in Iraq.  Well, “maybe” not today, but this lie is the kind of false impression conveying we’ve never killed innocent civilians in Iraq.  It just very well “fits” that Antichrist supporters would be my worst enemy.  Do this: Do a story about the Amiriyah civilian shelter, etc. then immediately have the imbecile state the above.  Believe me, most of Fox News Antichrist viewers will still believe the imbecile.  I know they don’t “target” civilians anymore (since my 1998 paper), but if we’re willing to blow up restaurants full of people and employees just because Saddam Hussein may be in there, then our military is still the evil which I adamantly describe!  Now, it’s great that there’s less attacks against Americans in Iraq, but still no American is innocent in the fair eyes of God when an insurgent take a shot at one of us (over there).  It’s like, say the Soviet Union violently took over the U.S. back 1983.  And they had to nuke Atlanta, Washington D.C., Pittsburgh, and other American cities every time they thought that Ronald Reagan was in each town, killing all the civilians.  (Well, Reagan refused to hand over our WMDs peacefully.)  Then say in 1988 you shot a Soviet guard in your neighborhood in revenge for killing one of your relatives in one of those cities.  Would you feel “justified,” or would you think it was Reagan’s fault?

 

The only way pinheads think they can beat me is with their limited facts told to the public.

 

I’m sure al-Queda uses facts about America’s direct killing of innocent civilians as an assured way to recruit suicide bombers.  So who’s the real evil, me or the idiots on Fox News?

 

I know you’re going to say that the United States deserves and has proved itself to be the only country in the world deserving of WMDs, and should have ethical control of the entire world.  But, I still think there’s got to be room for improvement in a country that suppresses HIV / STD cures.  Some think we live in a “democracy” but if the government asked the people to vote if they wanted HIV / STD cure suppression, I’ll bet O’Reilly a dollar that the majority would vote for truth, even though it would surely promote promiscuity, break apart marriages, requiring higher taxes to pay for the added child support assistance.  Or, only after learning the hard way, to a Nationally Paid Child Support Program across the board, which would just take the money dads are now paying on their kids and instead paying it to the government to just give back to the kid’s mother.  Then “marriage” won’t have to be such a requirement for sex, which will trickle up (and/or down) to solve a tremendous amount of other problems; where people will begin to understand how Jesus’ “love one another” could be “possible.”  The catch-22 is that you all are to dumb to be able to reckon this all out, and I can; but, there’s no way any of you are going to “just” do what I say, for “pride” reasons if nothing else.  My experience throughout my life tells me that most people I have correctly criticized who were wrong because they are dumb, will make up every dishonest excuse they can make their little mainstream mind believe against me; to the point where if I say the sky is blue, they will insinuate I’m wrong, just for their selfish, non-Godly coping system.  There are a lot of people out there who have me dishonestly blacklisted.

 

Question to Jane Fonda:

Someone asked her: “What do you think about what happened to the three million Vietnamese and Cambodians who died after the U.S. troops left Vietnam?”  I thought North Vietnam took South Vietnam as easy as we took Iraq.  But apparently not.  I doubt the North just “targeted” civilians during the take over of the South.  Likely they only killed specific enemies and insurgents… and probably any civilians like in restaurants blown to bits, hoping their “target” was in there.  Yeah, I’m guessing the North Vietnamese were as evil, ruthless and cowardice as we are.  And I betcha the people of North Vietnam don’t know the numbers any better than we know the number of Iraqi civilians killed by America bombs, etc., either.

 

But, if we left Iraq (and even if we gave authority to the advocates of Saddam Hussein), and three million Iraqis died because of it, it would definitely still be our fault.  So, I guess the only fair thing to do at this point would be to ship all of Iraq’s Shiites to West Texas.

 

I think the only reason we were hearing about the al-Saa restaurant for a few days is because we didn’t know if we had gotten Saddam or not.  I haven’t heard a thing about it since.

 

“Don't give me no hand me down shoes! Don't give me no hand me down love! Don't give me no hand me down world! I got one already.” –The Guess Who, 1970.

 

I didn’t know the sexagenarian Hillary liked disco:

“Heard of a van that is loaded with weapons packed up and ready to go. Heard of some gravesites, out by the highway – a place where nobody knows. The sound of gunfire, off in the distance – I'm getting used to it now. … This ain't no party, this ain't no disco, this ain't no fooling around.” –Hillary Clinton, 1996 (or maybe The Talking Heads, 1979).

 

You can do a lot of work poling:

Or you can ask Mr. Google who’s going to be the next President.  Type in “Hillary” in one Window, then “Obama” in another Window; then compare the Results counts.

 

Now who’s got more experience?

 

http://www.rense.com/general3/slant.htm, Iraq Accuses Kuwait Of Slant Drilling And Stealing 300,000 Barrels Of Oil Daily:

BAGDAD (AFP) - Iraq accused Kuwait of stealing its oil for the third day running Sunday, with one report saying it involved 300,000 barrels of crude a day taken from oil fields in the border area.

"The theft of Iraqi oil by Kuwait is not new," Saad Qassem Hammudi, a senior member of the ruling Baath Party told AFP.

Why use the slant drilling method if the oil’s legitimately on one’s land?  Americans I’ve talked to said they never heard about this slant drilling issue.  I wonder why.

 

Far out, man:

Early religions and certain scholars from the 1960s believed that by ingesting hallucinogenic drugs one can perceive the mind of God.  I don’t know, can one somehow “see” the Goldenrule while on hallucinogens?  Or, can that somehow make one to want to practice the Goldenrule more?  Well, then what does this society need more of?

 

Where I’d rather be:

I just don’t understand why Saddam Hussein would rather live in a hole in the ground.

 

Peace between Israel and Palestine:

My guess is problems will continue until the Israelis are living in West Texas.  Sure, the Palestinian will be happy and take whatever you give them, but the reality of the unfairness will regenerate in all their minds, while Israel is still occupying parts of their land.  I hope I’m wrong.

 

I read that Palestinians once restricted Jews from worshipping at the Western Wall.  That “sounds like” the Palestinians just wanted to be mean; but, I’m guessing they were just wanting to avoid problems.  Should I explain why they think the Jews would be giving them any problems?  I’ll try it: I’ll go to a museum and start causing problems; then “wonder” why they kicked me out.

 

What’d be funny:

…is if Hillary won, then during her inauguration speech Bill stepped up to the podium and said, “Hillary asked me to speak to you all today – she needed to go out to get her nails done.  Well, it’s great to be back.  Yes, yes: there are benefits to life when one is smart.  Now, this is how things are going to be. ….”

 

But who’s America’s real favorite?:

After the Iowa caucus, my mom mentioned she had thought that Hillary Clinton was way ahead, but now she thinks the American people want that “Osama bin Laden” to be President.  I agreed, kind of.

 

The Israeli pickle:

If I steal money from someone, then later die and give it in inheritance to my son, then he later dies and gives it to his son, etc., when is it legitimately not entitled to the sons of the original owner?  If we don’t want to build a Jewish Temple in West Texas, then I believe that Palestinians would agree if you paid them rent.  If you don’t want to pay rent, then there’s rent free land in West Texas just waiting for a Temple to be built.  The one sure fire way to get ethnic and religious prejudice eliminated is to create a fad for diversity in sex partners.  Maybe it’s the only way.  Then everyone will love people of other races, backgrounds, etc. instead of desiring to kill them.  Duh!  I realize no one will consider this idea which would solve all these kinds of problems: I just say it so people 500 years from now, who will tuned in to better ways, will see that I wrote it here in 2008.  Quite impressive, eh?  I mean, I look forward to hearing me being praised down here when I’m in Heaven.  Hannity, O’Reilly, and many others will only hear through eternity how they were dumb and evil.

 

Generic:

My, I must have something to say.  You say this .doc is so long that someone could use it for toilet paper for the rest of their life.

 

New York Times utilizes anonymous contributors to slander John McCain:

I’m anonymous.  Can I just say that the Pope wears polka dot underwear, and they’ll publish it?  Most of my anonymity is just intelligent logic which anyone can take credit for, and my sources are relatively easy to check.  

 

Even if McCain had an affair, it’s personal and therefore none of our business.  Let’s try to find some “constructive” criticism: something that could help make it a “better” world.  Let’s try harder!  Ain’t gonna happen, is it?

 

The only victim in a case of adultery would be his wife, and the press just makes her into a much bigger victim when they print it, regardless whether she allows or disallows it.  So the evil that can come from adultery is one thing, but the press can be much more evil.  And the sad thing is, they are far too dumb to realize it.  So the press needs to remove the plank out of their eyes before they slam a possible speck in another’s.  My website is their only way.

 

The Times should do a story via non-anonymous people, like that neighbor guy of Jennifer Flowers who had evidence about Governor Clinton having an affair with her.  Not because of the affair, but because he was badly beaten by Clinton’s goons –Clinton Chronicles (video).  I mean that’s from the horse’s mouth, who has identified himself.  And anyone who beats someone for just practicing Freedom of Speech, should not be President, and should be in prison!  Why am I the only person smart enough to know that?  Which also compares the Warren Jeffs “crime” to tiddlywinks.  Six billion people should be smart enough to know what can hurt us and what can’t, but they aren’t.  That’s why the Germans can have all their men run towards machine guns, while Americans equally have their men run towards machine guns.  If people where smart, we wouldn’t have wars.  Another reason Jesus demanded we turn the other cheek.  Believe me, the people who run our government and media are so dumb they’re dangerous.  Both are the cause of 9/11, and whatever future problem we get.  I realize the average person is even dumber.  Now, all you people congratulate me for my superior wisdom, and mail me a thank you note for helping you become smarter on another issue.  Definitely ain’t gonna happen.  Because I am so right.

 

Bush did a long speech 3-7-08 telling of the Freedom of Speech beatings, etc. violations of Cuba, yet everyone allows Clinton to violate the same, then elects him as President.  It’s like how the only reason Warren Jeffs is in prison is to end his seed of verbal thought directly violating his Freedom of Religion by using his Freedom of Speech only.  Again, many states allow young teens to get married with or without guardian consent (if she’s pregnant, determined only for the financial advantage of our welfare system, not if somehow early marriage can mess up the life of the adolescent).  So, again, tell “me” what the difference is between Cuba and the United States regarding violations of First Amendment Freedom?  The difference maybe is that Cuba might be honest about it, because we sure aren’t.

 

Times Square bombing:

The main issue should be is if the bomb could have killed an “innocent” person walking by on the sidewalk.  And it looks like it could have from the pictures I saw.  This is why it is so important to follow Jesus’ “forgive” instruction and let God be the judge in the Afterlife, simply because people are far to dumb to know that one is never justified in hurting an innocent person.  If that bombing is considered “justified” then that just justifies war!  Stupids!  On the other hand, if perhaps one could have killed the people before they blew up the Amiriyah civilian shelter, then one would be good-deed justified in the eyes of God.  But, again, no one really knows or can properly judge true right from wrong other than me (because the rest of American would say U.S. military personnel are never justified to be killed), so don’t even think about any kind of violence, as Jesus instructs, then you will much more likely be doing your part to better this very, very dumb world.

 

Again, no U.S. military personnel would have ordered or participated in the bombing of the Amiriyah civilian shelter if one of their loved ones was inside, even if they can put the blame on Saddam Hussein, or whoever did the slant drilling.  So, I’m RIGHT!  And, said person would have likely killed to have kept their loved one from being bombed.  (But, I’d still love someone in the preliminary stages of these issues to begin a media debate with me on these issues, where they initially think they could win.  O’Reilly or Hannity could actually win the debate… because they’d interrupt me every time I start making a good point.)

 

I don’t see local or world problem ever getting better with everyone’s true consistent dumbness, until someone very influential recommends all to visit my website.  And since we live in a nuclear age, it’s just a matter of time before the literal end of the mankind.  Because you’ll all again someday believe that bombing countries is the best way to get those people to like us.

 

The main problem in getting people to believe they should forgive and place it in the punishable judgment of God, is that today’s Antichrist Protestant church tends to make everyone believe that if you don’t believe in it then it won’t be that way for you.  Like since I believe in Jesus’ promise of Fair Afterlife Punishment, then I will have Fair Afterlife Punishment; but, if you don’t believe in Fair Afterlife Punishment, then there won’t be any Fair Afterlife Punishment for you.  But I tell you, what is is, and whatever Fairness that God has decided as just, will be for / against everyone, regardless of cop-outs.  Same with the atheists: whenever an atheist hurts an innocent person, they will suffer equally in their afterlife regardless whether they believe in anything or not.

 

New York Governor Eliot Spitzer involved in prostitution ring:

“He could get 5 years for each felony.”  Are you all pulling my leg?  I mean, do you all just enjoy me calling you all stupid?  All he did was visit a hooker.  How frivolous.  At first (via Fox News) I though he was “involved in a Prostitution ring” where he was like one of the organizers and gained profit.  I thought practically all politicians visited prostitutes.  I sure don’t want major decision makers’ minds all bogged up with sexual frustration.  Well, I’ll say it again: you are all too stupid to know what can and can’t really hurt you.  No one missed any meals because Spitzer visited a prostitute.  But I’m sure many people missed meals thanks to all the crooks on Wall Street, which Spitzer tried to stop.  This is just another reason why people would be justified in not paying their federal income taxes.  Even his wife is apparently okay with it.  Upset obviously by its exposer though.  I’m telling you: “dumb” is by far where the most improvement can be made.  I mean really: I could make a cat understand right from wrong better than I could a human.

 

Ashley Alexandra Dupre:

Now that the pictures are out, Spitzer’s wife will probably ask: “Eliot, would you rather be with her than me?”  He will need to reply: “No, honey – that’s silly – I don’t want some young pretty sexy woman, I want you!”

 

Well:

Sounds like things are getting more intense in Iraq again.  Well, better do another surge.  (That’s add another one to the one we’ve already got.)

 

And I’m even hearing about more innocent people our brave troops are killing.  At this point in time, after our imbecilic blunder of 2003, if our endeavor now is to help the people of Iraq, then we could stay for that purpose, but if we can’t do that job without killing people, then we should all come home.  If say Christian missionaries were there to help the people, even if they got shot at, would they be shooting up everyone (in a geographic area / vicinity) just to get even?  Very doubtful.  It also makes sense that as long as we are killing any Iraqis, we are still their enemy, because if the shoe was on the other foot we’d definitely feel justified in killing aggressors who changed United States laws via violence.  In Cedar Falls, Iowa, after a crook runs into an apartment complex, do the cops shoot up everyone nearby inside the complex?  We do it Iraq.  Because the truth of the matter is, we don’t really give three hoots about the welfare of the people of Iraq: we are just the real evil one-sided (mostly “dumb”) aggressors who plan to stay to eventually start a war with Iran and Syria from that strategic position.  So logically, for every American that gets shot in Iraq, the longer innocent men, women and children in Iran and Syria get to stay alive.  Israel (artificial salvation cop-outs) is probably the root cause of it all.  So don’t tell me that religious teachings for salvation other than the one Goldenrule is not hurting anything.

 

And, if the only Americans in Iraq were non-violent Christian missionaries, then I bet the violence against them would quickly diminish.

 

Slavery:

Slavery still exists today in Mauritania, even though they have laws against it.  Let’s get some talkin’ goin’ on about it.  They would probably argue that if they paid workers more, then their economy would crumble.  Just like the how America’s economy and progress crumbled after the Civil War. … Or, maybe it was more the other way around.  Like maybe it was the greatest productive and technological progress Mankind has ever seen since the beginning of Mankind, like probably ten times over.  Maybe allowing more time to “think” instead of forcing labor all the time, can make very productive changes.  My commentary is just trying to even make it “more” fair, to the “perfect” limit (for both progress and happiness).  With so many products made today to fail, maybe we’re actually on the downward side of the chart, since the last 20-30 years.

 

“It’s too expensive”:

Do I have to start showing pictures of the lepers in today’s world, or is someone going to get the cures to them, in this big bragging country?

 

Well, maybe we’ve regressed in some areas:

The Encyclopedia of American Religious History, 1996, p. 614, “sexuality”:

I don’t know how much it has to do with women’s rights, but I know it doesn’t have anything to do with women’s Freedom.  There are two avenues to utopia: (1) “Just” listen to what I say, and acknowledge open / free sex as the goal; or (2) legalize and moralize prostitution, where competition will bring the price down, then down so low that open / free sex will eventually become the norm.  The former is the easy way; the latter is the hard way.  The former requires more than one-step thinking to figure out; the latter is the one-step thinking solution.  So unfortunately the latter will have to prevail.  Naturally there will be a long period where many women will hardly ever have sex, since the financial gain is too low, to where later generations will forget about the fad of doing it for financial gain, and start doing it just for pleasure.  Each step one at a time.

 

Big letters there:

 

What “change”?:

All the Presidential candidates, even Republicans, are howling about all the “change” they’re going to bring.  No one seems to be saying they’re going to just accomplish the same old same old.  So, “change” must be what the people want.   But, who’s the “one” person in this entire world that can “really” bring change?  The correct answer is… me!  It’s clear to me from all the things I’ve read that “I” am the “only” person in this entire world that can bring the change everyone wants; because, it shouldn’t really be that hard to figure that all the current candidates will just bring more of the same old same old.  Example: Concerning the Iraq mess, George W. Bush was really more of a victim of the media’s far under-reporting of issues like the Amiriyah civilian shelter, slant drilling, etc.  Any new President is subject of the same ignorance, and one-sided pressures from the well uninformed American public.  Plus, any new President will eventually just get caught up in only games and self-centeredness.  Sure, there’s small improvements a President can achieve (not just take credit for), but people are not going to drive with respect in Miami Florida until my stuff gets disseminated – where people will fear God again, but this time for much more rational reasons; and, when “dishonest prostitutes” (especially the attractive ones) don’t have so much joystick control of all the men of the world (the marriage standard).

 

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/romney-rolls-out-change-message-too/, Romney Rolls Out Change Message, Too, January 5, 2008:

“My view is Washington is broken,” Mr. Romney said. “My view is it’s going to take somebody who knows how to bring change.” I don’t recall ever hearing a candidate defaming a President of his same party.  I guess it takes a special kind of goof-up to get it done.  Like not taking my 2003 advice of “enthusing” Saddam Hussein into traveling.  Of course, he was never a threat to us since the Gulf War anyway.  So you see what one can achieve when self-pride and revenge is the only thing a President understands. 

 

Itty bitty boats threaten big U.S. battleships:

Sure, a major war could start by some yay-hoo playing a little joke.  Since we don’t realize how much just our threats affect the minds of Iranians, I strongly suggest at this point finding a way to make friends with Iran.  Get some kind of trade thing going.  Start sharing movies, or something, because negative sentiment from our bullish threats could easily lead to something that we’ll eventually regret.  Plus, if they become friends, then if they do develop WMDs, they won’t have anyone in mind to use them against.  But, all this entails sucking in selfish pride today, so it won’t get done.

 

Obama, 3-1-08:

“Change doesn’t happen from the top down. It happens from the bottom up.”  I agree.  It just needs to be intelligent change… that has to do with the word “fair” – eww, successful people aren’t going to agree to that.

 

The catch-22 is:

…all successful politicians, media personnel, pastors, those who made straight A’s in school, etc. have found that the status-quo has worked very well for them, therefore actually shun “change.”  The “people” are the ones who keep wanting “change.”  So successful people are all going to continue to “say” they want change, but really don’t – unless they can precisely see how it’s to the advantage of the rich, or for another artificial salvation cop-out.  Even Democratic politicians only push for change maybe 1% more than conservatives.  Most common people are too dumb to know how to bring real beneficial change, so the wealthy have little problem maintaining status-quo.  I’m the common people’s only hope.  But since the rich ignore Jesus in the Bible, they’re also going to ignore me.

 

Random House Word Menu, 1992, p. 853, “New Age | Aquarian Age”:

It ain’t gonna happen without my website in the forefront.  Even if a new President can bring peace and prosperity to this country (again), it’s just temporary.

… “New Age | New Age”:

Nope.  One Word: “Goldenrule” eliminating all other cop-outs, is the only way.  Spirits, etc. might be telling them that it’s going to happen, but it’s going have to (correctly) “functionally” happen.  What do you mean God hasn’t said it (Goldenrule) before – it’s all over the New Testament and said by all other major religions.  God just had to wait for a living person to persuade it into correct implementation.  Practically all other religious teachings today has to do with helping the individual, not in helping the world overall.  Even when they talk about ideas in helping the world as a whole, their self-centered wishes have to be met first.  (Or, they’ll say the right stuff but then overrule it all with “Jesus paid the penalty....”)

E.g.:

P. 850, “Truth, Wisdom, and Spiritual Attainment | awakening”:

 

Jeremiah Wright says US Government manufactured the AIDS virus:

Has anyone asked what kind of “proof” he has?  That’s because no one wants to believe the US Government is as evil as al-Qaeda.  Since no one wants to know (or wants to believe the worst) then there’s nothing stopping the US Government from doing it, is there?  The Amiriyah civilian shelter innocent slaughter justified 9/11 (by the same rules), if nothing else. – There’s proof conclusive that we are as bad as al-Qaeda, but just under a different flag – as how O’Reilly puts it.  So it’s only “8%” of the country that cares about truth? – That’s pitiful.  If the government purposely spread HIV into Africa, it wasn’t because they don’t like blacks, it would be to help them to go to Heaven by trying to stop them from having so much free sex.  That’s right, Far Right Christians would actually believe they’d be doing a good deed by causing HIV to spread, especially prior to my writings.  After my writings, everyone will just try to save face.

 

The evidence sustaining that the US Government created the AIDS virus is not solid but is very likely, based on what I’ve heard; but, the evidence that they are hiding cures in much more concrete.  I remember even dating a nurse once who told me about her unusual incident concerning a top K.U. Medical Center AIDS doctor divulging to her on his death bed that there is a government hidden cure for AIDS (she didn’t know I also wrote for the media and dealt with the subject).  It would be very hard for someone to explain to me that our government is too honest and too ethical to have created the AIDS virus.  (I wish someone would try so I could get a laugh.)  I think if the possibility “exists” that they “could” create a fatal STD, they would; but, not to discriminate against blacks, but to curb promiscuity against the “Jesus” denounced (that no one is aware of) marriage standard.

 

Cures for all STDs would devastate things like the James Dobson ministry.  The only thing they’d have in their favor would be advice for parents to “just” keep information about sex and birth control hush from their kids – hoping to turn the clock back to the 1950s.  I’m sure it would work for another 30 years anyway (after release of all STD cures).  By then practically everyone will be an atheist.

 

Very contrary to what guys like O’Reilly and Hannity want to believe, I think we’re never going to end solvable problems until our media becomes honest about how evil they, and our government leaders, really are.  But, as you can see, the catch-22 is going to prevent it from happening.

 

However:

Random House Word Menu, 1992, p. 848, “Faith | Eschatology | Fate | apocalypse”:

Must be something big.  Specifically evil wouldn’t be such an apocalyptic problem if it wasn’t so much in charge.  I don’t see how it could happen either.  Someone very influential would have to first be “smart,” then “honest.”  Impossible!

 

Swinger clubs assert that husbands enjoy seeing their wives having sex with other men:

I guess instead of watching someone else in the porn movie, your wife (someone you love) can now be the center of attraction.  I can see how it can add some diversity to a couple’s sex life.  Well, I’d say that’s the opposite of the church standard which traditionally makes a husband want to kill / hate a man who has sex with his wife, which is the farthest think from Jesus’ “love one another.”  I still say participate at your own risk: in the status-quo, having sex outside your marriage can cause one to run off with someone else they like better (the fad is still having the best looking).  Open sex with no ties at all, is the best ultimate goal.  There nothing initially wrong with couples who want to stay with one another (whether they swing or not), until one wants out.  Then the other one is going to get hurt.  A fad for diversity in partners is the only answer.  Humans with our high communication skills, causes us to be a very, very, very fad / custom controlled animal.  A fad of pride for diversity in partners would be as well accepted as monogamy and pride in owning one person was 100 years ago, which was the pride in not letting anyone else touch your wife.  And probably more so, since diversity is the natural, and monogamy looms of the Devil’s anti-freedom restrictions.  It amazes me how the Devil’s fad for marriage could have ever been so acceptable.  “Dumb” it’s more powerful than anyone can imagine. 

 

Again, uncovering the Christian sex lies will not force any couple to have to break up, or have to swing.  I’m totally aware that the human mind can’t handle that abrupt of a change, concerning this immense of an issue.  This sexual truth will just allow freedom for a “new” generation, before they become corruptly instilled with monogamous desires and for the most attractive; and, it will allow a lot more people (young people) to become involved in Christianity.  But, it would probably be worse if the salvation cop-outs were still present.  So there are two major things that need changing, before things can begin to get better.  Issues concerning my economic advice, based on the free food that once existed, is open for suggestions.  I just don’t see how kicking the poor when they’re down is the solution, when 200 years ago, they had plenty with no guilt (west of the Mississippi).  Rich people once thought slavery was best, as they think today that kicking the poor when they’re down is best.  True advocates for the poor, like me, don’t gain financial support for these points. – It will only take the correct explanation to achieve it.  We also all need to simply “learn,” yes I mean “learn,” what really escalates war.  It has something to do with each side’s justifications for killing the other side’s “innocent” people.  I understand that more Iraqis are teeming together to rid the anti-American Iraqi militants, not because they kill Americans, but because they also kill Iraqi civilians; and, that may be the only real reason why attacks against Americans have been on the decline. – Others say the same.

 

Do wives like (sexually enjoy) two-timing their husbands?:

No, not in this society; simply because there’s no challenge.  The “game” has 100% to do with it (today).  Most of your swinger women have to be bi or lesbians.  It seems women many years ago loved being with another man.  Eunuchs were a definite plus, as eunuchs could have full sex with women with no fear of pregnancies.  In those days there had to be strict secular and religious laws that would stone her to death if she committed adultery.  But the man could have as many extramarital affairs as he wanted.  I’m sure if the same double standard existed today (in America), women would be having orgasm after orgasm while overruling that double-standard.  Especially the prideful equal-rights women of today.  Because of the challenge, guys now-a-days not only are allowed to pursue their natural desires, but they win “the game” when they “score,” which adds to the yearning.  In the old days guys weren’t so hard-up, as in the worst case, legal prostitution was readily available.  Rape was probably a lot less then.  Having a woman screaming rape was usually an immediate death sentence for a man in a city, as many would be coming to her rescue.  In the country, if you could “catch” her, you could have and keep her.  If this was an open / free sex society, women would be feeling the challenge much more, and yearning lots more for sex, simply because a man is done for a while after he’s finished, sometimes for days or weeks:  Revelation 18:5-7: “⁵For her sins have reached to heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities (her dishonest prostitution). ⁶Render to her just as she rendered to you, and repay her double according to her works; in the cup which she has mixed, mix double for her. ⁷In the measure that she glorified herself and lived luxuriously, in the same measure give her torment and sorrow ….”  God must have really given her a high libido (once the challenge is there).  If a woman is sexually free, she will probably want others to touch her nearly all the time, like a druggy’s never ending desire for their drug.  I can definitely tell the difference in her pleasure between an attractive woman and an “ugly” woman (no challenge versus challenge).  All this won’t happen in my lifetime, so someone else will have to figure out a way to balance it all out.  Revelation is not talking about a particular person: “her” allegorically refers to the female side of the conditional sex / marriage standard.  Now, my current “Christian” opposition will say I’m wrong about this, and that world problems will end when everyone all of a sudden just quits desiring sex outside of marriage.  Some kind of miracle that would have to be.  So, all I really have to work with is people who are “dumb,” and hard-core “Christians” who are “dumber.”

 

Funk & Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the English Language: International Edition, 1966, p. 225, “chastity belt”:

I don’t think they’d need that today.

 

Encyclopedia of Values and Ethics; Hester; 1996; via Central Resource Library, Overland Park, KS; pp. 13-14; “ADULTERY”:

Concerning the lower part of paragraph one: Aw, the women are just looking for a richer husband.

 

Economically:

Let’s all pretend that we’re all savages living around Kansas City 200 years ago. (1) We have all the free building materials that we need (land, timber, stones, etc.).  (2) We have the knowledge of traps, spears, and bows and arrows to defend ourselves from predators.  (3) We have all the free food that nature supplied within reach (that’s gone today), where there was no expense and little burden in raising our children – in fact they’re more help then burden past the age of about 3 or 4.  Now, let’s try to improve from that point, concerning “welfare” payments, and to expose the STD/HIV cures, which are hidden in necessity to help keep couples together, so dads won’t have to pay their child support “via” the government, like we do with our school system.  But, probably the biggest support for hidden STD/HIV cures in our trustworthy churches’ English translations of the Bible (e.g., “fornication”).  So, should I work on translation corruptions first then explain dumb second, or explain dumb first then translation corruptions last?

 

Church honesty about the word fornication, then cures for the HIV/STDs to an eventual open sex society, would cause a “paradigm shift”; in fact, the largest one ever.  But, for the better.

 

“I promise”:

I’m guessing Hillary is praying to God a lot now, that if she becomes President, she’ll do the right thing and not take money from lobbyists, etc.; but, will probably change her mind for the benefit of the country (I mean the lobbyists) if she gets in.

 

And people think I don’t need to help society:

The vast majority of people believe that it is much more evil for a willing married 15 year old to have sex, than it is to kill innocent people in Iraq.  In fact, most actually feel it’s a good thing to kill innocent people in Iraq, because it likely helped in some military operation, or whatever.  Regardless, ignore it in communication, but sleep better at night knowing that it must be to our benefit somehow, as is attending a church of cop-outs.

 

What’d ya say?:

“Does anyone care it ain’t right what we’re doing? Does anyone care it ain’t right where we’re going? Does anyone dare justify how we’re living? Does anyone here care at all? … We could be so much more than we are. – Oh this much I know” –Alter Bridge, 2007.

Pretty generic speech there.  “They” wish they had “answers.”  It’s probably the kind of answers likely only one person has.

 

Fox News knows how to spin:

More “accurately” they should report “adolescent girls having consensual sex for religious Freedom,” but they say “children being forcibly raped.”  Of course I’m talking about the 416 children and adolescents separated from their families at the FLDS “compound” in Texas.  (So much for the “importance” of the family.)  One was “beaten” (probably slapped once).  The “law of averages” says that’s going to happen (even if she as “beaten”).  It probably happens more often with 416 people living in Fort Wayne, Indiana.  The FLDS argument would probably be the fact that they practiced adolescent marriage, as all of Americas used to do, prior to the 20th century; so like they don’t want their “freedom” to change just because someone makes a law (prior to effective birth control) against it.  It would be like if al-Qaeda somehow took over the United States, and forbid anyone to have any kind of pre-marital sex or else face prison, I betcha there’d still be a lot a Americans doing what the old law allowed.  But, all they would need is “one” anonymous individual to say they had sex outside of marriage, then the entire town of Fort Wayne would be under arrest.  Now, I’m against polygamy, but I’m more for Freedom.

 

“He’s cool.”  “She’s cool.”:

Who’s “cool” and who’s not.  Well, O’Reilly is probably America’s best example of someone who is not “cool.”  As I recall, people who were “cool” were people who didn’t support laws that shouldn’t be laws.  That doesn’t mean they broke the frivolous (or antiquated) laws, they just didn’t advocate the enforcing of them.  I don’t ever recall someone being “cool” who hurt “innocent” people.  That’s cool.  The reason people like Fox News personnel wish to overly stress / enforce / even spin laws that shouldn’t be laws is simply for another artificial salvation cop-out:  If they can fool God into harshly judging things that they can easily not violate, like adolescent sex, Mexicans crossing the border, etc. as evil, then they think God’s will judge their real evils as less damaging.  Many times O’Reilly and Hannity’s best and only defense is simply because the situation is technically illegal, hence drops the iron fist, instead of a valid moral defense.  They even know the public is very gullible to their expertise in spin, and still don’t try to debate it.

 

Yes: I do realize it’s so bad that O’Reilly spins “cool” as someone who is the most uncool.

 

Jimmy Carter visits Humas leaders:

Yeah, that means Jimmy is trying to find a “fair” solution.  That’s why he’s so opposed by Israel and dumbest of the dumb of the United States.  The more (“fair”) fellowship we can have with the enemy the better.  Whenever someone doesn’t want to talk, I would say that’s because they either have something to hide or they know their argument will be found to be unfair.  And the way our leaders can spin an issue, our unfairness must be great if we don’t even want to talk with the enemy about it.  Fox News’s solution of keeping enemies as enemies can only ultimately be the solution with an eventual mass genocide.

 

“Love” is the answer:

I just heard someone (related to the Pope) on Fox News tell that marriage is “the gift of one to another.”  Let me add: And the restriction from everyone else.  Now, I strongly agree with the Pope on many things, especially charity.  But, just saying it isn’t going to get the job done.  Someone, somewhere needs to stress Matthew 25:34-46, where verses 41-46 says anything else is a cop-out!  Ain’t gonna get done, is it?  I agree with the Pope’s message of peace, but again someone has to explain a “method” for doing so.  And anytime we justify the killing of an “innocent” person, isn’t going to get it.  I also like his message of “hope.”  That could only be “hope” for the above and my website to get disseminated.  “I” am the Vicar of Christ, not the Pope, in that “Jesus” commanded we not marry (along with his strong condemnation of family), and Paul recommended we not marriage, so I submit that both Christ and Paul would consider “me” more the Vicar of Christ than someone who still supports the marriage standard.

 

If the Pope was really working for God he would not “bless” any particular person or group, a cup of water, or any specific area on the planet: he would bless everyone, everything, and everywhere!

 

The death penalty:

If your real blood brother was Jeffrey Dahmer, you would realize that he needs to be locked up for the rest of his life; but, you would not wish him to die.  The same with God: He loves everyone, and wishes the ultimate best for everyone, good or bad.  God would retain much more joy having Dahmer spend a life of playing cards with the guards than death.  “Fair Afterlife Punishment” will “change” Dahmer to live again in the Kingdom of Heaven.  With many of our Presidents feeling it justified to kill innocent people in war, with much support from the people, tells me that we aren’t worthy to judge a serial killer anyway.  Capital punishment advocates simple don’t have any religious “faith” that God will see to their crimes, especially if they’re Protestant.

 

Movie time:

So The Golden Compass tells the truths your church wants hidden.  The Goldenrule is not hidden, but all the realities of cop-outs apparently are.  Revealing “dumb” is the best approach.  Plus, for particulars, don’t ask the Catholic Church to reveal their deepest, darkest secrets: just ask me.  There’s nothing else that can turn the church to true righteousness than the stuff I’ve got.  And that fully relates to the sex / marriage issue.  Maybe the only thing in the way is my high degree of arrogance.  Well, you think I should be modest about this stuff?  It’s stuff no one else has ever totally fitted together.  There’s no other way to present it.  “A kind word can warm three months of winter.” –Japanese proverb.  Not when stressing the fact of Fair Afterlife Punishment, or unveiling religious lies.  “Those who bring sunshine into the lives of others, cannot keep it from themselves.” –James M. Barrie.  I never said this was an easy job.  “Love your enemies.” –Jesus Christ.  Mine is called “tough love.”

http://catholicfire.blogspot.com/, Catholic Fire, sub-title bar:

"IF YOU ARE WHAT YOU SHOULD BE, YOU WILL SET THE WHOLE WORLD ON FIRE." "LET THE TRUTH BE YOUR DELIGHT.... PROCLAIM IT..., BUT WITH A CERTAIN CONGENIALITY." ~ St. Catherine of Siena

Congeniality didn’t work.  If you can’t take the heat, then get out of the Dead Sea.

 

Fox News says the movie was an atheist movie, but I think it was more Gnostic, which is definitely Christian.  “Atheists” wouldn’t think anything could reveal religious truth, because they say there’s no God. – Read my conversation with the atheist.  If movie producers are aware of the secrets that the church has hidden, then why don’t they reveal what I already know?  Ain’t got no hair?

 

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street:

Yes, that is the method they use to procure your steaks.  So you’re all smarter than me thinkin’ it will never be outlawed.  So y’all go out now and have a hamburger and think “fair.”  And pray there’s no God.  I remember in 1974 Andy Griffith played a bad guy in the movie Pray For The Wildcats.  He was apparently getting tired of so many people coming up to him saying “Hey Andy! ….”  A good bad guy portrayal discourages that.  Johnny Depp apparently feels the same way.

 

 

:

“You… are the Crown of Creation. You… are the Crown of Creation. And you’ve got no place to go.” –Jefferson Airplane, 1968.

 

Mr. Critical – One computer, and that’s all I need:

 

TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/

(It’s the first time in the history of Mankind that all the answers have been available to everyone.)