Subject: “Fair and Balanced”:
–Indisputably the ultimate statement in the highest of pride in journalism. The only thing in the way is the ultimate reality evil and dumbness of the typical American. Since I’m not hearing a spokesman from al-Qaeda or the Taliban being given equal time on Fox News, I’d say that those like Geraldo Rivera, who actually believe in their heart that Fox News is Fair and Balanced, are so dumb that they actually think they’re not. This extreme dumbness mixed with the highest in verbal communication skills, proves that those with the highest in verbal communication skills are the reason for 9/11, etc. Even O’Reilly states that his main concern against the Gitmo terrorists coming to trial in New York City is that they will have the opportunity to state their side of the story. His view proves conclusively that Fox News isn’t anywhere close to wanting Americans to hear both sides of the story. Similarly, many, many Americans have duped themselves into believing that they have the mindset that God will want to save.
My writings cannot be stereotyped:
You need to realize that when you start reading my stuff, you’re leaving the realm of emotion into an all new exclusive world of intelligence. Otherwise, you’re going to reject everything as insult.
Realize that my superior wisdom is timeless:
Therefore, read my prior writings anytime you can, because many answers to today’s problems can definitely be found there. I do repeat and paraphrase a lot of things, but not always, because my stuff’s long enough the way it is. So, I’m constantly being pulled by should I repeat / paraphrase it again, or should I try to keep this stuff from becoming too long, where the most important writings get hidden in the haystack.
Well, how “crazy” and “perverted” is my open sex rationale?:
http://www.rense.com/general13/marr.htm, The Patriot-News:
60 Percent Of Americans Think Sex Outside Of Marriage Is Fine
Maybe I’m not as “crazy” and “perverted” as Fox News probably thinks. As long as I stay in “America.” My head’s standing up straight now. If they come and tar and feather me, then they need to do it also to 60% of the rest of the country also. So there! All the more reason why O’Reilly needs to make sure the public doesn’t hear about my valid Christian sexual findings, because I’ll have majority support rather quickly, I’d say.
One Muslim cleric says that sex outside of marriage “definitely won’t bring you pleasure”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04-tMecUJaw
I didn’t know that. Especially how the desiring more than one women is “against their very nature.”
Sexual love’s “powerful” stuff:
Charlie Sheen’s domestic violence with a knife against his wife (Brooke Mueller) may slow it, but doesn’t stop “sexually” based love, as they are getting back together.
Atheism is growing:
This article is pursuant to http://www.the-goldenrule.name/10-01-07__My_recent_debate_with_an_atheist.htm and the Timothy Freke interview video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orPuzjxU9gE.
I’m trying to fix Christianity. Atheists are trying to destroy Christianity. Right now, they’re winning. (Today’s “Christians are also destroying Christianity, but don’t know it.) Where’s the Goldenrule going to be when the base of Christianity is believed to be all made up? I think Jesus did exist, but even if Jesus didn’t exist and the entire story what entirely made up as mythology, where’s the evidence that proves it still isn’t God inspired? They say the fact that the Jesus story parallel’s Dionysus and other pagan “mystery” religions (even non-Greek), “proves” that it was all made up; but, I say, either way, since Dionysus and all those “mystery” religions (including Cotytto, Orpheus, etc.) are noted for having sex orgies, it just proves that God inspired the entire thing to circumvent Middle Age corruption for me to use today in support of free love (especially concerning my just released Cotytto-Baptism connection findings). That notion just makes “me” believe in God even that much more. I mean, first of all, it takes some real future knowledge to know to circumvent future corruption. Then, it also takes future knowledge that there would even be future genius (me) that would capitalize on the supportive facts, all to make it an eventual “free love” world, so “tangible” love can prove to make a better world, by making everyone into a sexual “object” (the opposite of how we are taught it today); which is the “key” to the solution to everything else, as it would build more of a “true” / emotional Goldenrule. Plus, there would have been no way early Christians would have had the future knowledge that there would eventually be a pill (effective birth control) that would allow me to present it. I agree with the atheists that since today’s Christians ignore Jesus’ Fair Afterlife Punishment, that only hypocrisy rules; but, when Jesus is destroyed instead of just repaired, then absolutely no faith in Fair Afterlife Punishment can deter real sin. If atheists win, sure most “endeavor” to be honesty, but in “reality” the world’s just going to end up as one constant lie, cheat and stealing stage. We need to keep Jesus’ real teachings. So, “fixing it” is the only best solution.
I think the Gospels vary enough on the same story indicating that is was derived from the normal human error of misinterpretation / misunderstanding of the also variations in the apostles’ speeches. If it was all written as mythology by a side group of Greek Jewish leaders, then it would be more consistently set, instead of being in so much variation: leaving out entire moral stories, paraphrased, etc.
The fact that Christianity became today’s largest world religion, tells that God should have been there inspiring this one, or we’d just better forget the entire thing.
I personally think that there was a real man Jesus who was crucified, who said the pertinent God inspired words mixed in with lots of direct and indirect allegory, with some later aggrandizement by the apostles. In other words, in reading the Bible, I think there are times where the people are seeing the real man Jesus and times where they are seeing a God placed hallucination – mainly for the miracles, and to comply with earlier Jewish prophecy (and the pagan parallels) – to get the people to start following a “nobody.” It makes sense God would need to use both to make it get to the idolatry level it is today, so “I” could use the vast popularity of Jesus to support my very unique superior moral reckonings. Since I live in a post-pill world that can allow free sex, God is most happy with me doing my thing without the aid of miracles. Miracles are just a lie of reality, and reality works best in truth. The miracles just created the idol Jesus that I can work with today. People will eventually see how Jesus supported my sexual and Fair Afterlife Punishment rationale, then the rest of my thesis can get the respect it needs to create a perfect future ethical standard. You see, I don’t need the miracles because Jesus got the miracles. I’m going to win favor based on 100% logic. And, God knows that’s, by far, the best way for the world to receive it. I know you all think I’m just crazy, but I know I didn’t start this thing out with said intent; but, I’m now convinced simply mainly because of the vast stupidity of everyone else (or, to be less insulting, their: inability to reckon out workable solutions). Now you’re double thinking I’ve got to be crazy to think that anyone would want to follow a “nobody” who insults their pride. I agree, but I know my Jesus sex findings and Jesus’ Afterlife Judgments are valid, and will eventually prevail. So, don’t try to understand my writings, just save it all somewhere, because I’m mainly talking to people in the future.
But, again, whether Jesus really walked or not is irrelevant. All that matters is that He is the world’s biggest idol today; therefore, people will follow Him right or wrong. I’m just trying to get it fixed so everyone can only understand the “right.” Surely God already knew, but I’m finding that idolatry always wins over logic in the extremely stupid human mind, as everyone (right or left politically) are so biased.
I mean, either way, the characteristics of Dionysus, Cotytto and all the “mystery” parallel religions, are the worst prior deities for God to follow if Jesus was the anti-sex bigot that today’s church wants us to believe. Well, I’m trying now to get it disseminated. “Dumb” is considerably going to continually be in the way.
The real reason we allowed the underwear Xmas bomber to get on the plane:
Naturally The International Terrorist List doesn’t have priority over The National Harassment List, which is a list of people who have used Freedom of Speech to suggest a better way in religion or politics. Like how Nixon had his goons follow and scare John Lennon and Yoko Ono, for their anti-war speech.
Then there’s The National Watch’em ‘Til They Goof List. That’s the list of people who have trusted the protection of the First Amendment to piss off harassing government people. That’s where they constantly surveillance someone solely waiting until they say or do something technically illegal, so authorities can attain the highest in personal satisfaction by jailing someone they don’t like. Warren Jeffs is the best example.
You’ve got to realize that authorities only have a limited number of employees to monitor these people.
Shame and guilt:
Churches in the past have traditionally caused a sense of shame and guilt upon people who have sex outside of marriage. Then today they warn that one reason to not have sex outside of marriage is because of the shame and guilt you’ll likely feel. They’ll first create the evil, then capitalize on it. I am amazed with myself that I’m apparently the only person who knows this, and the only media person who thinks it should get corrected. I’ll stay broken as long as the mainstream media “thinks” it should stay broken. And, as gullible to brainwash as media leaders seem to be, that could be a long time.
I would think that they’d enlighten the truth, like sometime before they die, or retire; but, I don’t even think they’re able to even consider that my language scans could be valid.
CIA director Leon Panetta is taking flack for not interrupting his vacation over the Xmas bomber incident:
I would have told him to immediately fly back to Washington, so to help the support of Israel’s need in worshiping a wall instead of the Goldenrule – which is really what the whole thing boils down to. Surely, then, he would have immediately desired to end his vacation early for that all important purpose. Or, would he have really said to just tell Israel to go to hell?
Years from now, space aliens will be explaining how the people of Earth became destroyed over their belief in worshiping a wall instead the universal teaching of treating others fair. Their listeners surely won’t grieve too much over the loss.
Deep thoughts:
You know, it’s hard to imagine that God is still “digging” it when ants do their thing. But, it’s true: God likes everything that does well and achieves something. God’s mind must be bigger than ours, as we can only appreciate something when we do it well that achieves something. Or you could say: we’re pickier because of our limitations.
How come everyone used to smoke?
When everyone smoked years ago, it causes a much more honest society compared to today. Some, but less greed, dishonesty, etc. What was going on is that cigarettes create a kind contentment with life in general. Without some level of contentment, extremes of greed and selfishness flourish. Since cigarette are unhealthy, open sex is probably the only way to produce a content, more honest, less greedy society; that will totally eliminate prejudice against blacks, Jews, Muslims, Iranians, North Koreans, etc. It’s like if a white bigot has sex with a black person once in a while, then they won’t be prejudice against all blacks any longer.
Paraphrase:
A correctly inspired (in God’s fairness to all) open sex society, would also create a content satisfaction with life in general, that will curb greed and dishonesty for material gain. It’s like how people eat more when they quit smoking. Hypothetically, if cigarettes weren’t so unhealthy, they’d possess a level of satisfaction that keeps one from the “greed” of overeating. Open-sex can be optimized in a type of thrilling manor to realize this same kind of objective (especially for women). Today, monogamy is like eating pizza every day. I like pizza, but I wouldn’t want it to be my only food source for the rest of my life. The sexual desire for others still exists no matter how attractive one’s wife is, unless you naturally have an abnormally low libido. By the way, low libidos rule more in this society because they conform better to presently taught principles; that’s why the exceptions (like Clinton) stand out so much. Therefore, the few are still the ones who want to keep the lies going, and they do influence others simply because their voices are so much more prevalent. That’s my biggest hurdle; because, I know the majority of people would rather have the truth about Jesus made known than the current antiquated lies. The only ones who would oppose it are the gold-diggers: attractive married women who don’t have to work.
The democratic party prevailed because of the Iraq pickle:
…but, come next election, I presume Glenn Beck is going to paralyze that present progressive passel of porky prominent pacifist politicians packin’ (Democrats). So, I need to put priority pressure on my powerfully pleasing, praiseworthy plan to purge all taxes and provide all the people a proper prerequisite provisions payment, which will not preclude prudence in the pathway of practicing, and still provoke participating pride in, the preexisting proclaimed palette of work placement positions (my economic solution); while still giving premium professionally produced products precedence (no communism). So, we can prevent that pathetic partisan parody of preposterous pompous prejudice pretending put-on pro-war puppet profiteers (Republicans) from prevailing the premium public place, so we can push the proper position to protect the population and prosper.
So, don’t procrastinate: get on the page and publicize my proposal – paramount!
Now, I don’t how else to say it if you didn’t get any spit in your eye.
I haven’t paraphrased any good anti-war statements lately, have I?
If I go to France, should I try to just wear a T-shirt that says Warmonger on it, with a drawing of American soldiers running their bayonets through some women and babies, with a motto saying “That’s something to be proud of”; or, should I just let my accent say it for me?
I know all you “educated” people out there are smarter than me:
…but, since there are currently lots of people collecting unemployment insurance, who aren’t really looking for jobs, now would be a good time to test my 11-11-08 economic theory: Begin allowing them to get a job and not lose their unemployment income. “Educated” people would tell me that none would start looking for a job, because all are totally satisfied living just on the unemployment and doing nothing all day. But, “stupid” me thinks most all would end up with a job; again, where it wouldn’t reduce their unemployment income.
If there are really no job openings anywhere in private enterprise, then the government could just print up some free money to pay them to earthquake proof all the houses by lining houses inside and outside with Line-X’s Paxcon.
http://dcnonl.com/article/id20943 (Daily Commercial News and Construction Record), Polymer spray protects building occupants:
The tests consisted of detonating more than 200 lbs. (91 kg) of TNT and 4 lbs. (2 kg) of C-4 Plastic Explosives at a stand-off distance of approximately 30 feet (9 metres). The room protected with Paxcon remained virtually intact and test results indicated an occupant would have survived the blast.
I’d ask for a quantity discount, or just have the government make it.
Three kinds of love:
(1) The kind of love everyone is supposed to have for one another in church. Well, that’s “really” very limited by how great someone’s personality, looks, etc. are. Therefore, “phony” love (beyond the natural). That’s like telling everyone to be honest with a “faith alone” teaching: with no penalty for being dishonest. (2) Charity love, where gifts, etc. are given. Yes, it’s “tangible” love, so it’s a very good / workable / creatable kind of love. But, what the receiver of said gift is more loving back is the gift, not so much the giver. (3) Sexual love, making everyone (all adults) into an “object.” It’s the only kind of “tangible” love where the actual physical value of the giver is basically loved equally back. That way they all don’t have to have a happy / likable personality. And, God just thought that fire was the best source for light at night. I mean, God just thought sex was a great motivator to reproduce, but now it’s proved (reckoned out in logic) to work for a much better Goldenrule society… like the invention of the light bulb. You’d say that God doesn’t like us mowing our lawn, but I think when we decided to embellish nature, God probably thought it also looked better. So, if a little pleasure called “sex” can end prejudice (via diversity) and make everyone into a desirable value (via diversity), regardless of how great their personalities and/or looks are, then the only obstacle in the way is “dumb.” But, “dumb” is a huge bug in the talking human animal. It’s like teaching a dog to understand what to do when we say “sit.” We think the dog is smart for sitting; but, if it’s anything like an equally dumb human, it would run at a machine gun upon command. So, communication skills don’t necessarily make us know the logic of what we overwhelmingly trust.
1-12-10 turns into 2012 (via adding 1+1 in anagram) for Haiti:
Fox News told that 80% of Haiti is / was Catholic. I understand that the added reinforcements that would have saved most of the fallen buildings and houses, lacked because of the crucial need of “money.” So, where was all of Jesus’ money?
Oh, I “see” where Jesus’ money went.
Yeah, that’s some expensive stuff. That’s a place that teaches, well, apparently, that everyone else is pretty much on their own, just as if there is no “charitable” church. We may as well all be atheists, right? Well, let’s ignore Paxcon also. Oh, I covet my eventual visit to the Vatican, so I can feel the presence of God. Oh, oh, OH!
If we can’t even get the second “(2)” level of love right, how are we ever going to understand a material sexual desire for everyone? You say: Just go to any Protestant church and feel God’s salvation feeling when the pastor tells us all that we love each other so much. (Then get away with whatever you want the rest of the week.)
How’s come places like Haiti are so poor:
Mainly because everyone is content with just making ends meet while living in the ghetto or woods. But, I betch if a government bus stopped by every morning telling that the government just printed up some free money to give to anyone who wants to get on the bus to work the job site that day, lots would for logical “more” reasons. Of course, there needs to be a market near by: a place to spend the money. If no one will, then I’m sure Wal-Mart, etc. would see the advantage – to get that “just” printed up money (backed by all the new stuff being made in the country). So, “intelligence” is the answer.
I suggest trying the idea with a place like Haiti first, so when everyone has lots of infrastructure and better built homes filled with stuff, if it fails, it won’t be so devastating (especially when they can still utilize the new infrastructure, having a well built home filled with lots of stuff). Like when someone “dumb” like Hannity comes in and says your government can’t just print up free money.
Really, really simple logic to me; really, really hard for Fox News Channel:
Because any of us could have been born black, Jewish, Muslim, in Iran, in North Korea, etc. being prejudice just can’t be universally correct. Most are guys around O’Reilly’s age or older who were raised that way (therefore, more ignorant). People who think like that way who are in their 30s or 40s, like Hannity, Michelle Malkin, etc. are just pure evil: pure Satan, and darn proud of it. Where guy like O’Reilly don’t “realize” what they are.
Sometimes it may be just to help show the true colors of the very influential:
The first evening after the Haiti disaster, O’Reilly did acknowledged the issue, but pretty much indicated his opinion that we shouldn’t be down there trying to help. His reasoning was because their leader is a crook. That “may” be true, but if O’Reilly had been born in Haiti and was a needy victim, his opinion would be different. This just further proves my point that just because one is highly educated, speaks intelligently, and even looks smart, it usually means the opposite when it comes to thinking beyond the box.
Microsoft Vista:
It was designed to make a “few” things faster; in exchange of making “many” things work slower. Heck, it didn’t only make “many” things work slower, it also made “many” things not work at all – and that’s pretty slow. Is it worth it? Well, it is for Microsoft if it can get everyone to buy all new every few years, and accept “most” of it still working slower than its predecessors. We’re all lucky that President Bush “just” dismissed Clinton’s monopoly lawsuit against Microsoft.
What most Christians today believe and trust:
They believe and trust they’ve got God on their side by kissing up to His name and worshipping Him in church. “Doing” the Goldenrule is secondary, especially whenever it’s to their disadvantage. You see, since bootlicking is what gains favor against humans, they think it will work with God. But, even if I worshipped by boss’s name, even came into his office and constantly told him how wonderful he is, but never worked the job, I’d get fired pretty quickly. So, “dumb” explains most Christians today.
I think the moral difference between today’s Christians and atheists is that today’s Christians do the Goldenrule more in simple common respect, which requires little sacrifice, but vote against it in big issues. Conversely, atheists are usually more angry and rude, but are advocates for the Goldenrule in major issues. Non-mainstream Christians are more the ones you want to trust if you hired them to repair your air conditioner, car, or anything that requires some element of trust. That’s like the Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, etc. They seem to have a better Goldenrule because they are Christian, but have to try harder to prove it. Now, they’re not perfect, just “better.” I have the only perfect Christian website. I’m also personally considerate, and definitely support Goldenrule issues. One step further, I also have the ability to harshly criticize those with power who don’t worship Fairness. Most people are either total pacifists or total jerks. Solutions can only be found in-between the two extremes. I’m starting to find that the ones who speak to me in pure military type of perfection and respect are the ones who can’t be trusted as much as the one’s who express their real opinions. Military “yes sir, may I have another” are generally smarter people, who know how to do a better job, but just one element of deceit or trickery can make things lots worse in the long run.
We’re all victims of lies much more often that we think:
Since lies and deceit are things that are hidden, especially when done by smarter people, all of us here in the U.S. don’t realize we’re a victim of a lie probably 99% of the time; especially in trickle-down effect via deceit from people with power, and mostly in our media hiding the rest of the story; and, in the fact that fluff sells more than technicalities, or we would have been getting rid of trans fats sooner. But, again, the biggest threat to the U.S. is eventual nuclear, biological, and chemical terrorism, simply because our media have been trained to “fluff” the people by avoiding saying anything pridefully bad about the U.S. I say that if we never try to correct the fairness basis of our dealings with Muslims, we’re just going to make things worse the more innocent people we kill trying to get those who fight for fairness to Muslims. And, since starting WWIII is the only way to combat Muslim countries’ development of nuclear weapons, I suggest just doing “the impossible” and allow the U.S. to lose another ounce of pride (like we did in Vietnam). Don’t worry, really: Americans have 101 instant cop-outs prepared for justifications. Therefore, nothing is going to stop the next major blunder until my website is acknowledged as the only one fit for Christians. (You say, there’s no way I could be the only one with all the answers, but I’d sure like to find another.)
Surely Nixon surrendered the Vietnam War just to spite mainstream Americans, since they made such a big deal out of Watergate. The timing is too coincidental. Nixon had no other reason to stop the war; and had been just getting meaner in his psychological pressure of slaughtering more and more civilians. Realize, without my writings, “targeting” civilians is the normal emotional human warmonger default. Once, I’m dead and gone, it’ll be back full tilt. We also did it in WWII. (Today, we just “endeavor” to not “target” civilians, which still isn’t good enough in my book.)
Referencing the Oklahoma City Murrah building:
And, somehow lots of people still think God will waive Fair Afterlife Punishment, when the Truth comes down the pike.
There’s absolutely no evidence that the church changed the definition of agape love:
I mean, the church did retain the “charity” part of agape love, but removed the “physical”/”touchy” (sexual) part. So, who cares?
I don’t see how “faith alone” has gotten in the way either. I mean, if there’s no fear of Fair Afterlife Punishment, then there’s no guilt.
In 1945, with the aid of a few American planes, the British firebombed 135,000 to 250,000 German civilians in the medieval city of Dresden, German, just to encourage other civilians to pressure Hitler to end the war, and to show the Russians what bombers can do. I understand the technique causes a wind that literally sucks people up into the flames. But, I’m guessing the German media reported it like Fox News reported 9/11, where no message other than “just evil” was conveyed.
You see, when you justify killing innocent civilians to save other innocent civilians, then “anything goes.” And then two wrongs always makes a right.
Only very recently (after my 2006 enlightenment) we are finding in Afghanistan that the more innocent bystanders we kill just causes more people to join the Taliban, not the opposite. So I guess “dumb” has always ruled until… recently. I’m sure “dumb” will be back soon.
I recently learned that we (the U.S.) was more into eugenics that Hitler; which eventually became “discredited” solely because we used it to define Hilter as evil.
Whoever’s “the least” should get “the most”?
Jesus says we have to care for this guy?
Not me, I’m gonna give my time and dough to this guy, because I can tell he more needs the medicine:
Then “I’d” more likely get a raise or something back.
Goldenrule statement in The Book of Eli (movie):
Denzel Washington’s character told that what he got out of the Bible was to “Do for others more than you do for yourself.” But, then later recites the entire Bible for publication. Tell me if I’m wrong, but if the above indicated summary is valid, then he could have just told the people in San Francisco to write the entire Bible as “Goldenrule.” Then all the contradictions and confusement could be eliminated to make everyone better understand the proper instruction. And, the optimum “pithy” is a lot better than thousands of words.
I think it’s just a sign of what’s to come:
Republican Scott Brown comes out of nowhere and wins the Massachusetts Senate seat over Democrat Martha Coakley. Since Obama has decided to partly follow O’Reilly and move more towards center, the Democrats are losing their constituency. If Obama instead had followed what I say about the economy and health care reform, then results would probably have started shining though by now – it’s been a year – thereby winning favor for Democrats.
Dog versus human – there’s really no intelligence difference:
You know, I’ve completely researched Christian sexual Truth: totally beneficial when organized correctly, and comment better solutions on many other issues; but, lots of “people” like still bite me while I’m trying to rescue them from the Los Angeles River. “The fact I’m there to help him is nice for him, but he doesn’t understand that.” –Joe St. Georges, Los Angeles Fire Department firefighter. I totally understand Joe’s logic. They say often humans also fight rescuers.
To date, no one has had the courtesy to “explain” how I’m wrong about “any” of my major issues. So, I’m going to assume I’m right. The cruelty and ill thoughts really just proves me right more than wrong. Well, I’ll be dead someday, then the best thinker and most honest religious researcher who has ever lived will not be available to your benefit, where trial and error (a lot of error) will be the only way for improvement, where atheism will thrive causing more and more dishonesty.
There’s actually a website called “Friendly Atheist.com,” indicating like most atheists aren’t friendly.
Osama bin Ladin:
…once again states that it is our support of Israel that is his cause to get us. I can’t believe Fox News aired it. But, airing something 0.01% of the time is hardly anything, concerning the root cause of the biggest news story of the last 65 years.
Morgan Harrington body found (was missing after Metallica concert):
Her dad said: “We now need to find the person who did this, and we will not stop until that person is brought to justice.” I thought Jesus paid for everyone’s penalty. Well, it sounds like some people will become disappointed that there’s no Purgatory in the Afterlife. Yep, Jesus must have been wrong in Matthew 5:23-26, and everyone else who wasn’t Jesus must have been right.
My gut is saying that she took an offer for a ride with some punks who got pretty touchy in the car, then when she demanded to be let out, they decided they’re not going to just get rid of this quality stuff. So, they took her to the remote area, raped, and killed her as a witness. Too bad it wasn’t a future open-sex world, where punks wouldn’t be so hard up; thereby causing the murder. The more punks that knew about the murder, the better the chance of something happening to cause them all to be found. Like conversation to a “trusted” third party. If not, we can all just be glad there’s no Afterlife Purgatory. And, those who agree with that statement are probably worse than said murderers.
I’ve got my sign ready for the next Tea Party:
My single’s life:
Anymore, I just tell the women I meet that “You’re not going to get sex from me until you’ve properly earned it!… by letting me to take you to dinner and a movie first.”
Super Bowl Focus on the Family commercial:
We wouldn’t have the great Tim Tebow if his mother would have just been taught the advantages of abstinence.
Happy Valentine’s Day:
“To the world you are someone, but to someone you are the world.”
See, I can still think status-quo.
“Love doesn’t make the world go ‘round. Love makes the ride worthwhile.”
I am saddened when I hear about a divorce.
Woman are “Tired of being treated like a piece of meat”:
Well, it’d be a much better world if everyone could see everyone as a “valuable” “piece of meat.” Women being “a piece of meat” causes men to treat them a whole lot better than if they weren’t “a piece of meat.”
Finding the logic in John 13:34: “Love one another”:
“Love” is basically likin’ something a whole lot. But, the way Jesus says to “do” it in instruction, it has to be something that requires an “action.” But what’s an “act” of love? Well, it is “charity.” So, I agree with the Catholic interpretation. But, it is also the reciprocal actions of “sexual” love. It can certainly be “forgiving” (we’re to do it, not God: Fair Afterlife Judgment. We will be able to do it better as long as there is assurance of Fair Afterlife Judgment. Which there is, in bright Red Letters [or Brown here].) All around, it’s “doing” the Goldenrule. Agreed? Or, what merit does it have if it doesn’t make another happy? My main point: sexual love for everyone (one another) doesn’t break the Goldenrule, and since it is basically a mutual good feeling, then it’s doing the Goldenrule in the “easiest” and most “natural” way available. “Easiest” and “natural” will always win over anything else, especially if it’s difficult to do, like charity or forgiveness (still good to teach, though). So, it (open sex) is the key to the solution to all the rest of our problems. “Logically.” I “love” it when no one can prove me wrong (that’s a “blessing in disguise” kind of love for you and everyone else).
The Pope teaches that dishonesty is the best policy:
Harry Knox, an Obama official for the Human Rights Campaign, disagrees with the Pope: The Pope wants to fight HIV by abstinence only, and not telling people about condoms if they do. Knox is coming under Republican fire for disagreeing.
As stated in my website’s “PREFACE” the sequence of advice should be (1) abstinence, then (2) condoms and/or spermicide. Then that covers it “when” God’s strong sexual desires overrules absinence. It’s “honest” versus “dishonest,” as the Pope and many others show their true colors. Again, we are in a transition period between pre-effective birth control (the pill), that doesn’t hamper sexual enjoyment, and an open sex world: Jesus’ open sex advice is only for implementation in a non-STD world. But, the catch-22 is that no one is going to want to pay for “going against God” in finding STD/HIV cures. So, the ONLY solution is disseminating the Truth about Jesus, but only to get the cures, then telling everyone to go to it. I don’t think there’s going to be a mass of open-sex going on once the people are told the Truth about Jesus, simply because today’s atheists and today’s cop-out Christians pretty much have sex whenever they want anyway. Attractive wives will still demand their husbands not see other women. The STD/HIV threat will still deter many. Women will still say “no” just because they were raised that way. It’ll just begin the road to STD/HIV cures, then once there are cures, then society can return to the promiscuous tendencies of the 1960s and 1970s.
The truth about the Pope is that he would press abstinence only EVEN IF there were no STDs, just because he’s very well “educated,” and old, and therefore has the greatest inability to think outside the box – even worse than O’Reilly! His mind is “set in his ways” times two. Plus, these guys weren’t God gifted with any libido, therefore aren’t going to understand how “abstinence only” can’t be the ultimate solution.
The Pope would argue that if we can make people believe they’re living in the technology of 1510, they will be inclined to not have sex in the first place; and I agree it will work in many instances. But, while in this transition period, neither plan will “work.” Again, the only ultimate solution is the Truth about Jesus, and the Truth of Reality, to optimally and realistically cure STDS. Again, the Pope will forsake Jesus before going against his grain. You have to “learn” to trust Jesus. Don’t trust me, I’m just the messenger. People are flat-out not going to give their money out to “go against God.” Therefore, STDS/HIV will be hurting and killing millions (or possibly billions) more in the long term (as you can never totally suppress condoms and spermicides), then us financing a quick solution. And, it’s a solution that will promote a “real” (sexual) kind of love.
Hey, ye’ all:
My nonoxynol-9 spermicide, which kills HIV, herpes, gonorrhea, chlamydia, etc. in the test tube, says to reapply it after one hour. So, if you’re an African prostitute told to use it for a 1996-2000 study, you need to use, say, ten a day if you’re working a ten hour day (you’ll make more money that way). And, studies have found that using it as frequently as the above will cause inflammation and sores inside the vagina and anus causing an avenue for HIV to enter the bloodstream. So, based on that study, on December 18, 2007 the FDA mandated that all products and condoms containing nonoxynol-9 give a warning that it “doesn’t protect against HIV or other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).” So, don’t use it that often! Only use it when you have sex with your spouse or boyfriend. If you’re at a big sex party, just try to do all your men in about an hour or two. Then just lay in the hot tub, or share some conversation at the dinner table.
The UNAIDS (United Nations Programme on AIDS) did the 1996-2000 study. I can’t find anything about any subsequent studies – especially studies of people who only use the stuff maybe once every other day. Let me know if you can find any. If you can’t, have Obama order some, before the Republicans get back into office. You see, using nonoxynol-9 doesn’t hamper sexual enjoyment like a condom can, thereby causing a more promiscuous society. And, this society sure wants to become promiscuous. Sarah Palin’s not going to order another study for what the majority of Americans really want; so ask Obama… soon. You see, the problem is welfare taxes: When people are screwing around more, marriages / relationships break up more, and what happens half the time: fathers try to get out of paying the child support, then welfare has to pay the balance. So, it all has to do with money instead of your health, remember that. I, only, have the solution to it all. And, I’m pretty sure that “only” is a fact.
Technically, a prostitute working a ten hour day would be better off not using the nonoxynol-9, as without the added excessive irritation, basically the vagina doesn’t bleed, therefore less risk of getting HIV, but, of course, more chance of getting the other STDs. The Bible speaks against prostitution. Here’s another reason. Overeating is not good for you either. I’ll betcha if everyone got a basic needs check from the government every month, and open sex became the standard, there wouldn’t be any prostitutes anymore. Yes, it is “possible.” Again, I “only.”
What’s the world need more of: “Good intentions” or “Good followers of idiots, right or wrong”?
Plus, the saying: “The road to Hell is paved with good intentions” is contradicted by Jesus in Matthew 25:31-46 where He explains exactly what kind of souls go to eternal Heaven and what kind go to eternal Hell. For example: “… for I was hungry and you gave Me food,” tells more of “good intentions” than following today’s anti-welfare plan. So, I’m going to trust Jesus over contradicting cop-outs. Jesus even gives the solution to those who only think they have to worship the Idol (Jesus) and no one else, by Jesus placing Himself as Everyone in (low end) need.
To error is human. But, if everyone in the world had nothing but “good intentions” then the world would be a whole lot better place to live. Then proper education would be the key in solving the rare mistakes. Otherwise, if everyone only followed human idiots and selfish rulers, then the world would be exactly what it is today.
Sure, unknowingly once in a great while, the food you give to the needy will give them food poisoning. But, that doesn’t mean we should quit giving food to the vast higher percentage that won’t get sick, and become fed as a result. Conservatives don’t agree.
“I was a stranger and you took Me in”:
What’s worse: someone who thinks they are evil and tries to lie and cause unnecessary problems all the time, or guys like O’Reilly who actually believe they are Heaven bound as they support laws against Mexicans wanting to work hard in America? Well, the morons only hurt a few, because their evil is rather apparent; but, O’Reilly influences a very large amount of people who “just trust” laws / idiots right or wrong.
Rationally knew it’d come, but still dazed:
Since I’ve been promoting my website, I’ve been getting lots of positive comments (more then the few negatives ones). But, I don’t know how to deal with people who are being nice to me. I might have to take a course on it or something. I do best at criticizing, so I’d better stay behind the scenes.
Don’t forget to say something for the defenseless animals, Mr. Critical:
When a chicken had a huge pimple, guess who’s eating it when it gets to KFC?
Mr. Critical – You eat dead animal remains… and you think I’m disgusting?
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/