Subject: “Right or wrong”: It just makes for easier thinkin’
If I joined the U.S. military, I wouldn’t be fighting for the right side. I wouldn’t be fighting for the wrong side. I’d be fighting for the right or wrong side.
12-07-09
What would be the “worst” country?
(1) One that says they suppress Freedom of Speech they don’t agree with; or (2) One that says they allow Freedom of Speech, but really suppress it whenever they want? Well, one tells that a change is needed, and the other conveys a change is not needed.
The Fort Hood shooting:
You know, Hannity and O’Reilly hate the Fort Hood shooter, but superior intelligence says that Hannity and O’Reilly are the kinds of people who caused the Fort Hood shooting, via their support for the Jews controlling the Holy Land museum Goldenrule cop-out instead of the Muslims. So, when the truth comes down the pike, Hannity and O’Reilly will someday hate themselves. But, it will be too late then for them to change it, so they’ll just go on through eternity just knowing what scumbags they really were. I think God wants to make sure they at least know that. Hence the need for Purgatory, as it’s apparent they won’t change until they actually feel the same suffering that they caused.
I generally try to say things that everyone is far too stupid to realize. Why bother talking otherwise?
Deep thoughts:
How come the radio volume doesn’t change when one drives closer to or farther from the broadcasting tower? Well, the answer would be more beneficially educational than what we normally hear on Hannity or the O’Reilly Factor.
That right guys: Just explain why we drive on parkways and park on driveways; then, folks ‘r learn something that’s right.
Shared:
Citizens With Cameras and
Video Recorders Are Surely On The "Terrorist" Watch List Now Under
The USA Anti-Patriot Act!
Of course, there are pros and cons to the above; I’m just trying to fix the cons.
Could be that the government watchers were spending most of their time analyzing and harassing me, ACORN, and whoever else that might show how dumb and evil government people can really be, with higher hopes to “get” us, instead of Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter. You see, personal emotions still probably determine who gets targeted the most. And, since Hasan was one of “their” own, the vast mindless unfair power of favoritism, discrimination, whatever you want to call it, sticking together right or wrong, etc. had precedence, even with all the obviousness in Hasan’s emails, etc. I still say that Warren Jeffs had to have just said or did something degrading to someone of power. You see, being fair and logical is “difficult” for the human mind to achieve. Mindless emotional cop-outs are “easy” for any dumb animal.
Advantage of free sex:
In addition to the fact that there’s no victim of sex outside of marriage in a fair society, when you tell a human being that one of the most pleasing things in life is an evil sin, it has to screw up their mind; likely to the war mongering, greed based society that we have today (that’s unfair/dishonest greed, not healthy desire for continuous betterment). The simple accepted non-suppression of open sex can likely make a world of difference. It’s only that I can figure this out in a matter of seconds, where your mind wouldn’t be “able” to figure it out if you lived 1,000 years (beginning with the brainwash of today).
Someone told me that all those early Greek societies were open/free sex:
I don’t think so. You see, in logic and truth, there’s a huge difference between prostitution and free sex. It’s basically called “money” (or, more expensively, the “souls of men” in lifetime obedience to just one [usually selfish] woman). Proof is simple logic: Whenever a society has prostitution and/or marriage, that means there isn’t a whole lot of women walking around willing to have sex for nothing. Because (in other words), if most of the women are free and easy, then how could a woman sell it or require marriage? Again, Jesus doesn’t need to comment on this one, simple logic will refute the misunderstanding. Plus, the classical period polytheistic deities all had basically a main characteristic that separated them from the others. And “mystery” religions of the time practiced free love as part of their ritual (which Christianity was said to be one, according to “Catholic” documentation). But, many still had a different main reference. Like of wine, the moon, agriculture, etc. Cotytto appears to be the only one whose main characteristic title was “sex orgies,” and with priests who performed lots of anal sex (targeting a specify kind of group) with a specific ritual called Baptism. Therefore, when God referenced Baptism, he did it to someday overrule the later evil / corrupted church, to cause a Second Coming of Christ. That is simply the same old Goldenrule characteristics of Christ firmly reinstated, and (mainly) with no overruling cop-outs (and, with no addition victimless sin lies). That’s all.
If you read about all the different pagan deities in the time of Jesus, and if God is the irrational anti-sex bigot that the church definitely has you believing, you will understand how God would have made a very, very big mistake by supporting the Baptism rites of Cotytto, as pagan deities and their key characteristics was the defining language of the classical era. You see, during the classical period, pagan gods were as popular as… gods. Believe it or not! (I know you can’t because they aren’t as popular as gods today.)
So, I don’t think my work today is just of another crazy fool. So, explain how I’m wrong other than “It just couldn’t be”? And, if you don’t think it’s that big of a deal, than why are so many mainstream churches ignoring the subject? And, why are even private enterprise profit-making businesses discriminating against me and my “Freedom protected” writings, flat out refusing to disseminate it (right after they receive the copy), if such is not a big deal? (–Maybe I’ll tell the details someday. It’s really as legally bad as if a restaurant today verbally refused to serve blacks.) The whole religious dishonesty comes crumbling down when the first gay book comes out on the subject. And, it’s at the point now where if I die tomorrow, it’s set in the process enough that it will eventually become known to all. But, for now, it’s definitely the one thing that the mainstream church doesn’t want the public to know about. You see, it’s clear and conclusive enough that most would be able to understand it.
I did get “some” feedback:
Well, (after some / enough dissemination [over 12,000 names]) there were a few (three) religious leaders who told me that I had a couple of technical errors in my first opening lines at my Baptism-Cotytto webpage (while I was trying to be pithy), which they said was their justification why I was wrong about all the entire rest of it. So, I corrected / elaborated the “errors” in “my” opening statements (to make it only a bit longer), so to justify all the other references I cited. Therefore, now even the nitpickers are going to have to even totally “ignore” it. The “errors” were: (1) “The priests of Cotytto, the goddess of promiscuous sex (including gay / bi sex), were called “Baptæ,” the base form of Baptism.” I more correctly added: “The priests of Cotytto, the goddess of promiscuous sex (including gay / bi sex), were called “Baptæ,” the same base form of Baptism.” (I added “same.”) (2) “Jesus’ Old Testament quotes are from the Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint), not the Hebrew Old Testament.” I corrected it to say: “Jesus’ Old Testament quotes are mostly from the Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint), not the Hebrew Old Testament.” (I added “mostly.”) You see, I originally wrote it assuming that people would have sequentially read my prior Septuagint pages that elaborated the “mostly” part. So, now that I’ve corrected this part of “my” writing, thank God that means all of the dictionary and mythological pages I scanned and cited can also be correct. But, a possible blessing in disguise, because if I hadn’t made those two “errors,” then I wouldn’t have gotten even one response back, making me think that the bulk mailing didn’t even get delivered; aside from six total requests to be removed from my list. I guess that’s not only six people who don’t care about the truth, but six people who want to document that they don’t care about the truth. They want to make certain that God knows their strong stance against the truth. All this just tells me, is that there are a tremendous amount of people out there who “think” they’re saved, when they really aren’t even close.
This narrows it down (the above assertion that all those early Greek societies were open/free sex):
One thing I can’t show you is all the other kinds of deity entries in a book or a website. The only way you can understand how many different deities and different key characteristics there are, is for you to look at the book at your library (or, ILL it there), or the website. But, here’s one from such a book that indexes by topic the deities by their characteristics:
Dictionary of Mythology Folklore and Symbols, Jobes, 1962, Vol. 3 (topical) Index, pp. 255-257, “ORGIES | OBSCENITY (DEBAUCHERY, ORGIES)”:
So, if God is the irrational anti-sex bigot that you’ve been taught, would you agree that any of these Greek or Roman deities should not be supported by God / Jesus? Well, highlighted in orange are the deities who practiced Baptism; and, again Cotytto was the only deity titled to be of this kind of behavior. So, God had better make certain that He doesn’t support her in any way. Right? (But, did in His one ordered sacrament.) Agave, Bacch…, Maenad & Thyiad all associate with Dionysus, the god of wine, but very famous (today) for sex orgies. I have a huge listing at my homepage connecting Dionysus with the earliest of Christian art. Artemis / Diana is also connected with a Bible word supporting her (“aselgeia”) which has been totally reversed in meaning, who is also defined as a “virgin” using the same Greek word that the N.T. cherishes so much (see ARTEMIS / DIANA link at my homepage). I haven’t ran across anything related to Christianity on Lamia, but I think she’s really of a different kind of character. Hypothetically, if God made His one sacrament instruction directly relating to Lamia, then we would have to eat our children and suck men’s blood. Obviously this topical index category was sorted by what modern day teachings say is “evil.” I think I’ve covered all of the both Greek and Roman listings; and, I would say that this index should make it easy to see that both wine and Baptism are both popularly attributable to sex orgies. Note also how “wine” is even used as a symbol today in the eucharist. So, get the book (all volumes) and notice how many other deities aren’t in this category.
I think what people hear about is the outrageous and unusual stories (orgies); therefore, believe that everyone was like that in that (Greek) culture. It’s like people who live in Iran, China, etc. today probably think that everyone in the U.S. is a homosexual, simply because it is the relating topic they hear most about. But, as we know mainstream religion in the U.S. is still far from accepting homosexuals.
The coming of the Messiah versus the Second Coming of Christ:
First of all, why would you have to bring the same teaching back if it hasn’t been corrupted? You see, you have to understand that the Second Coming of Christ is not a new entity; it’s just the same old one reinstated. True, the Old Testament prophesied a new entity / Messiah that would state God’s new / final / true intentions, overruling any Old Testament contradictions / errors, “fulfilling” the Old Testament prophesy that really was just saying they didn’t have all the answers from God at that time. For Cotytto, to understand it, you have to understand that God would have known that His Christian church would later become corrupted during the Middle Ages, and that He knew how easily gullible people really are; especially in a era where one would be executed for telling the truth. From what I’ve read, if I hadn’t been born, it’s very unlikely that anyone else would have ever uncovered the same findings that I have, or, especially, would then allow themselves to be blackballed by a large part of the population. Apparently, this stuff has been so well hidden that the gay and lesbian community didn’t even have the slightest clue. But, they do now. You see, allowing homosexuality in the church allows sex outside of marriage, and therefore open / free sex. Future people will have to also understand my (also very unique) interpretation that lusting with the “eye” has everything to do with discriminating sexual partners: desiring just the attractive; and, that an initial fad for diversity in looks will end with sexual desire for everyone. And that if everyone cared as much for one another as men do for women, it’d be a much better world.
And, the fact that fathers are allowing sex to be talked about in primetime television and movies, thanks to the pill, the general public will be moreover accepting of my truthful findings of Jesus. The main obstacle is just the need to “save face” for religious leaders. That’s the only true / rational logic that stands in the way. But, placing their personal selfishness over the teachings of Christ is absolutely nothing new to them, as indicated by the vast amount of today’s artificial salvation cop-outs. The real dumbness and vast gullibility of the human mind allows this. If we didn’t have our high communication skills, I think we’d be as dumb as a mouse. Our mind has adjusted itself to rely so much on communication for leaning and understand, and therefore has diminished its older ability to reckon outside that box. The advantages of communication is huge, but the disadvantages of brainwash is equally huge.
So, when someone says that “Judgment is Coming,” yeah, it might be true; but, it’s the same old Judgment that we all could have read about in any motel room in the country. I guess the biggest idiots in the country are like the Pope and others who believe that Jesus is going to pop out of the sky, and order an all new Judgment to overrule the one He mandated 2,000 years ago. Well, if He did, I’d start to believe that Jesus can’t make up His mind, even if He did come via a miracle. Everyone is such an idiot in this world that I don’t know what to do. I’ve never met anyone or read anything even near my reasoning aptitude, except for the Gospel.
2012 movie:
As told by the wise monk/guru (Lama Rinpoche): “Do not believe in something simply because you have heard it … To see the light of wisdom, you must first empty your cup.” I agree: There’s so much brainwash out there that everyone “just” believes and trusts (especially in today’s church), that the only way to even consider outside the box is to completely start over in one’s mind. That’s why I could get better results from an animal than a human. And, it all seems to be on the hierarchy scale, where everything that people trust and would die for, is by who says it rather than what it says. And, as dumb as humans really are, I don’t see a way to change this basic truth. What the world needs is “one” leader that can guide them correctly, who can also set up documentation for the future. Today’s church doesn’t have it right. Democrats don’t have it right. Republicans especially don’t have it right (who would bring back slavery if they could). And, things have only gotten worse as communication (TV, radio, Internet) has gotten better, which allows the real power / personality liars (the money) and idiots to influence even more. The one-step thinking emotional human mind really has no defense against it. I’ve seen evidence that a shark is even more naturally smarter than a human. The only reason humans progress is because of our high communication skills giving prerequisites to our offspring, which is also what will probably be the cause of the end of the world. So was it worth it? If you gave a dog or even a cat the same communication ability as a human, I think they would pass us up. It entirely has to do with how naturally gullible the creature is, and how well it thinks inside and outside the box. And, dogs and cats mature much faster than a human. A baby human has to sense thousands of more times to be able to figure things out.
Monogamy is not the answer:
“25% to 33% of all relationships are affected by domestic violence.”
I say we need to hold that earth together: not let it crack up into a million pieces, and instead find a peaceful solution to the end of the Mayan calendar:
Puddy knows.
The 2012 movie is based on the ending date of the Native American Mayan calendar. I hold very little respect for the Maya as they practiced multitudes of human sacrifice; and, differing greatly from the many Indian tribes that Lewis and Clark encountered, marriage / monogamy was the Mayas strong custom. But, let’s try to analyze it anyway: The calendar just stops on that date, so anyone can draw their own conclusions about what it might mean. So, let’s do pretend it was inspired by God. Well, human sacrifices have pretty much ended, I think. But marriage / monogamy is still the standard. Again, it’s the Mayan calendar that ends on that date. I can’t see where God might have anything to do with it. It’s their calendar and it ends on 2012. Sorry, I’m not getting any kind of message from God here. Again, unlike most Native Americas, they had a strong marriage / monogamy standard and it’s their calendar that ends on that date. Nope, this is one prophecy that I just can’t figure out.
However:
I think most people’s first impulse of my website is that since it’s not for sell, like in a book at the bookstore, then it must not be worth anything. So, 100% charity work is very hard to understand in today’s society. Especially, when the researcher is modest and doesn’t seek personal credit, thereby only stressing the Goldenrule name as the leader. As my sources indicate, all my findings are out there for the taking, but I haven’t found anything near to the extent of my compilation that puts so much together on the sex lie subject. If there is, it’s not indexed by Google. I wish there was, then I could have saved myself a lot of work. Years ago, people would tell me that that’s just “one” thing that says that, thereby supporting their disbelief that the people we’re taught to trust the most (religious leaders) are the ones we should really trust the least. But, now I have thousands of different and valid references “that says that.” How could I attain so much if I’m so wrong? (And, I’m so correct when I tell that the churches’ support is them “just” saying it, and everyone “just” trusting them, especially concerning “love” and marriage.) You see, when someone reads “one” thing indicating a corruption, they’ll question its validity and assume it’s either a mistake or an isolated incidence. But, what I have done is put it all together to draw a very convincing conclusion. And, if anything, the way I was rolling for a while, there’s probably a lot more stuff one could find, since I’m convinced that Jesus and many of the early Christians left many supportive messages. But, I’ve got Jesus “new commandment” in a conclusive form (the Septuagint), and actually proving the church as direct and definite liars; and Baptism. So, I don’t even see how I could find anything better than those two. Also, the definition change of fornication is another very important basis, proving another major lie.
Plus, I’ve received some very good expert arguments in the last six months, concerning some of these issues, some correcting a few of my frivolous points, but none correcting any of the major points. Sometimes during the debates I’ve even make some great new points / refutations that I ended up publishing to the website. Usually their points are points that I’ve already addressed, that they just hadn’t read. I admit the website is huge, but only because I actually have so many good points, either in valid reference or in commentary. So, now I do worry that people will not be able to see the trees for the forest. Some people are emailing me just stating that I’m a liar, even with the thousands of valid references I am now citing. But, it makes sense why they’d think that, because the only realistic conclusion is really that hard to believe. “Dumb” still explains it best, as those people know that they would lie in support against sex, but they can’t believe that the Medieval Church would do it. And, that’s in the day where one would be executed for telling the truth. And, in that day they didn’t have effective birth control, therefore more of an argument, simply because of the then same greed level (taking of possessions) that we have today. I don’t know how else to explain or emphasis it, but I’m not lying about anything, and my conclusions are valid and rational, unless I’m so screwed up in the head that I’m seeing houses where there are cars, and trees where there are people (as sure as I’m sitting here, or as sure as yesterday's tomorrow is today).
You see, if someone a hundred years from now wants to know my name, they will hear “The Goldenrule,” and therefore the instruction is in the name. Today, when you ask someone to “believe in Jesus Christ” it can easily be translated into a cop-out believing only in His name, that He existed, that He paid for one’s penalty on the cross, etc. In other words, you just have to “believe” in the cop-out. But, when someone says they “believe in the Goldenrule,” it instructs the teaching of Jesus much more, and leaves a lot less room for cop-outs. God has to be very, very pleased with my work and effort.
I’ll eventually have to initially ask people who want to debate me which of the two categories they fit:
“So, do you also want to fight for the innocent, or are you just another disinformation expert?” I mean, if I’ve misspelled one word on my website, that’ll be enough for a disinformation expert to use to “prove” I’m wrong about everything else on the website, to the majority of Americans. Of course, I run across my own misspelled words and grammatical errors all the time. Errors probably occur mostly when I worked sleep depraved. Anymore, I don’t bother changing it (unless it’s so bad that it can be misunderstood), because that entails having to update the entire html and all its image files, which makes my dated backup XCOPY batch file run lots slower, and sooner that I will have to do a major overall backup. I’ll just leave my frivolous grammatical errors there for the disinformation people (the Johnnie Cochran’s) to find. If people can’t judge things properly by the logic of what it says, instead of the speaking expertise of the talker, then it’s really just a matter of time before this entire world falls.
I’m fully aware that you all think you already know it all:
Most people probably tell themselves that if my website findings are valid, as big as a lie that it is revealing, it would all already be common knowledge. Therefore, they “know” it has to be wrong. Well, if anyone in the past has ever brought this stuff up, they probably encountered the same disbelief or ignoring cover-up that I’m experiencing. I mean, Fox News, CNN, etc. now have all my information presented to them. Do you hear it on the news today? So, you need to understand that there is a very good “reason” why my findings are not common knowledge. And, this “reason” also proves to me how HUGE of an issue it really is. And, the lie saying that “agape” meant non-sexual love proves that today’s religious leaders are actually worse than dirt (see my Septuagint pages that proves conclusively that agape included sexual love, to make it a definite part of the commandment that Jesus ordered us to do between one another). And, the fact that the vast majority of the top 12,000+ religious leaders in this country are totally ignoring my valid Baptism-Cotytto correlation also proves that those who were just duped about the agape definition, are also really the exact same kind of worse than dirt. All this makes God’s Judgment against them clear to the souls who do make it to the Kingdom of Heaven. And, Jesus even told about it in advance in Matthew 7:22-23: 22Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' And, today’s religious leaders are “selling their souls to the Devil” just to save face: just so they don’t have to look stupid or dishonest in from of their following. Even if you can perform “miracles,” you’re going down if you can’t be honest about what Jesus really said. I’ve explained in the past how practically all of mankind’s wars were fought just so someone didn’t have to admit they were wrong, and how that showed the power of an individual’s selfishness to save face. It’s the same in this situation. And the stupidity of the normal greedy American clergyman is really pathetic: Religious leaders make their abundance of money by telling the cop-outs, not by condemning their congregants who have ever had sex outside of marriage. So, this continued antiquated anti-sex talk, just to save face, is just going to lessen their incomes.
Speaking of wars:
Though it does cause a great deal of brainwash (or mistaken beliefs), communication can be the eventual cause of the ending of all wars. If every American right now understood what every Iranian felt as unfair, then we wouldn’t be placing sanctions against them and threatening invasion. So, it is the Fox News’s and the CNN’s that’s the only relay to make the ending of wars possible. And, I am apparently only one of the few who can see that they are doing a lousy job of really reporting Fair and Balanced.
And, the “great deal of brainwash” communication is caused only because top / influential communication is so extremely bias. So, Fox News is very correct when they “promote” that true Fair and Balanced reporting is very, very, very important for this world, and is what the majority of common people want; but, getting them to actually do it another thing. I can see that some of their reporters (like Shepard Smith) actually believe that there reporting is Fair and Balanced. But, what’s going on there is that the story has already been biasly corrupted before it even gets to their teleprompter or desk. Geraldo Rivera is another. And, most of the time, the Fairness of the premise is so far from their reach that they can’t even consider the true understanding of the situation. Like the unfairness that Jews should be in charge of the Holy Land instead of the Muslims. Everything that’s wrong with the world today seems to always come down to individuals’ selfishness in religious cop-outs. So, I’m certain that my work and commentary is even bigger than big.
The Afterlife:
For financial gain, practically all religious leaders today try very hard to downplay that God / Jesus has already determined and has told how Judgment and pertinent punishments will be. There are two types of Afterlife Judgments, or I should say: two ways we are judged. At the top of my website is a quickly drawn image of how the Goldenrule is divided into two parts: (1) not sinning, and (2) doing good deeds.
“Not sinning” logically has everything to do with “never hurting an innocent person.” This is supported in Matthew 5:21-26: the “danger of the Judgment.” First, I should note, in verse 22, Jesus tells that one must have just cause (or a “valid” or “legitimate” reason) to have something against another person(s). In other words, they have to be an “innocent” victim of someone else’s lying, cheating, stealing, etc. If you’re angry just because someone did back to you what you did to them (or, via a representative like the police), you not only don’t have “just cause” but you also may face punishment in the Afterlife for that. Therefore, we all need to admit when we were the one(s) in the wrong (Judgment for not only the sin, but also the after / continuing sin of holding a grudge against the recourse / revenge from the innocent victim). And, of course, the rest of the verses tell about Purgatory like punishment for those who die without ever reconciling with or compensating someone who has a legitimate gripe against them. Sometimes a simple apology will suffice, but if you like stole someone’s car, you need to give the car back, or if the car is wrecked, pay them the value, including their time in pain and suffering. If you punched some innocent kid once at the playground, you need to look him up today, and pay him a thousand dollars or something that would have balanced out his suffering at the time. Jesus didn’t need to elaborate all this, because it is simple logic. The fortunate thing about this first Judgment is that the punishment will eventually end, commensurate to the pain and suffering endured by the victim(s). Also, Revelation 13:16 talks about the placing of a “mark on their right hand.” That tells that this Purgatory Judgment has everything to do with what you do: what sins you’ve done; again, against innocent people during your life. And, of course, Rev. 13:17 (the next verse) tells that you can “buy or sell” Purgatory suffering if you make valid restitution to the actual victim, as Jesus ordered in Matt. 5:24-25, overruling Jewish cop-outs. You see, first you have to clear the mark on your right hand (evil you have “done”) to be properly prepared for the second judgment that tells exactly what kind of person you are overall (the “mark on your forehead”: what you think / believe).
Now, since you eventually get out of Purgatory, the second Judgment has to do with where to put you for eternity, which is a very long time with no end. This has to do with the other part of the Goldenrule: “doing good deeds.” God / Jesus tells explicitly in Matthew 25:31-46 that if you had a strong Goldenrule during your life, regardless if you’re an atheist, a Muslim, a homosexual, etc., you will go to the equally good-deed forever happiness of the Kingdom of Heaven. But, if you didn’t practice a strong Goldenrule during your life, you will forever be punished by never being able to be in the Kingdom of Heaven, just like how you mostly ignored the needy during your life (within your means). It’ll be like being in the school punishment of “time out” for the rest of eternity. It’ll be like all the other kids getting to go in the ice cream store, but you will have to stay on the bus because you are being punished. It’ll be like when your parents grounded you for the rest of your life, but this time it won’t be an exaggeration. All the happiness that you will be able to retain throughout eternity will only be what you had during your earthly life. But, Jesus tells that you will be missing a whole lot of further happiness. You’re be like the excitable dog that gets put in the bedroom, just to whine because he wants to be with everyone at the party in the living room.
Now, if anyone tells you that Judgment criteria hasn’t yet been determined, or that God will Judge you in any other way, even if it’s the ill informed speculation of Paul or the Disciples, realize those are all misunderstandings and/or cop-outs, and are not to overrule Jesus. You see, if a Pope or anyone “has the power” to determine Judgment otherwise, then we wouldn’t have any stability with everyone determining Judgment in every kind of different direction. So, “Jesus” is the “one” God has chosen to be the proper and final choice for Judgment. That means any contradiction before (like the Old Testament) or contradiction after Jesus (Paul, the Popes, Billy Graham, etc.) does not overrule the final correct Judgment of Jesus. But, since it is so obscure today with all the multitudes of continuous church cop-outs, there needs to be a “Second Coming of Jesus Christ” to reinstate what has already been said. Today, even if O’Reilly “determined” how we will be Judged, many people would go along with it – especially if they could still sin and ignore the needy (O’Reilly’s kind of crowd).
This would also be a good time to repeat what I’ve told in the past about the important need to forgive those who wrong us: I even recently heard a story about someone who lost a loved one by a killer, and how “the Bible” really helped them through it by telling them to forgive the killer. Therefore, yes, it is very good to forgive wrongdoers, as it will lessen your victimization. Truly from God, it works. But, another helpful aid in the difficult attempt of forgiving, is knowing that God will “assuredly” place equal punishment on the wrongdoer in Purgatory, even if the goal of freeing the victim(s) minds in forgiveness is reached, and even if the victim(s) ask God to not implement Fair Judgment. God will punish the wrongdoer the same anyway, for the balancing need to correct the mind of wrongdoer. Again, Hannity, al-Qaeda, George W. Bush, etc. have all proven that they are never going to understand how they are in the wrong until they have felt the exact same suffering that they have caused. And, correcting / fixing things that are wrong, broken, etc. is not only what every individual’s goal is here on earth, but it is also God’s goal, as we were made in His image / likeness. But, we should forgive, since most of the time we do not have the means to punish our wrongdoers (in lying, we many times don’t even know who the liar is, or even know that we’ve been lied to); and, even if we do, we will usually always exceed the equal part (eye for eye, tooth for tooth), giving excessive punishment, just making matters worse overall, leading to even all the wars of mankind. Again, those who have been correctly filtered through Purgatory will cause the creation of a Kingdom of Heaven where no one wrongs any other; and, those who failed to have the right heart in helping the needy will at least know to not intentionally wrong someone while they all float through the limitations of limbo for eternity. Therefore, only true helping hearts and non-wrongdoers are placed in the Kingdom of Heaven. Why would we want less?
And, you can’t be like O’Reilly who does give to the poor (and I applaud that), but does only because he fears the above: you have to be the kind of person who wholeheartedly likes doing for the needy. Otherwise, once people like O’Reilly would enter the Kingdom of Heaven, they’d not be generous there, as they only gave to get there. Us people who gave much more wholeheartedly (this research and commentary) shouldn’t have to put up with self-centered people for eternity, should we? That wouldn’t be the ultimate “Freedom.” Therefore, if you’re a charitable Republican or conservative, you’d better make certain that you also vote for people who truly want fairness for the poor and needy. Like Mexicans wanting to cross our border – a great example. Sure, O’Reilly type people only want the intelligent Mexicans who are studying to be doctors, scientists, etc. But, “Jesus” said the needs much greater to allow the dumb, the ugly, “the least,” the mistake prone Mexican, etc. who needs a better life. So, Jesus’ final Judgment is far from what most Americans even know. And, trickle down economics is not it. Wanting to pay employees of stock companies the least so your stocks will be optimized, is not it either. Sure, those who give but just for the hopes of salvation, will get back “equal” pleasures in Purgatory (I think Purgatory does both punish and reward), but not enough to get your total Freedom in the Kingdom of Heaven. The Book of Revelation also calls this “good deed” second Judgment those who are written in the Lamb’s “Book of Life.” Plus, selfish souls would corrupt the Kingdom of Heaven into the lying, cheating, stealing world that we now live. Then it wouldn’t be the Kingdom of Heaven. It’d be the Kingdom of laws and punishments.
O’Reilly’s angry about possibility of Gitmo 9/11 terrorists’ “justification” coming out at the trial:
If they weren’t “justified” then why worry? I mean, people “just” call my religious findings crazy, but don’t want it to be known to others. That’s because it’s really not crazy, and they just worry about losing face. If all the people who put themselves first, then God second, dropped dead right now, it’d be a much, much better world. But, God doesn’t work that way, or Hitler wouldn’t have been about to invade Poland. Most “Christians” today would say that the Polish “must have” deserved it; to support their belief that their personal dishonesty, etc. must be justified. Anyway, O’Reilly asked the Gitmo attorney what possible justification could the terrorists had in killing that many innocent people on 9/11. Well, probably the same “justification” that we had in bombing thousands of Iraqi civilians. Which neither are justified in my book; but, is justified to everyone else, solely dependant on which “side” they’re on. Human’s are very, very dumb animals. And, has anyone else noticed how there are a lot less people who are competent in their business, since say the 1960s?
I credit Netscape for allowing me such successful religious research:
By November of 2002, I pretty much had all the same findings that I recently finished organizing and published to my website. About that same time, the library where I did my research changed all their public terminals from Windows NT using Netscape to Windows 2000 using Internet Explorer. I realized then that the Netscape browser was probably ten times faster than Internet Explorer for serious Internet research. In Internet Explorer, every time I clicked Back then opened the next Google Search result link, it would not only delete the text in the Find box, but it would also close the Find box. Therefore, in Internet Explorer, I had to click Edit > Find (because Ctrl+F is so far apart that I had to look at the keyboard every time to make sure I’m not hitting the wrong key, therefore equally time consuming) every time I went to another Google Search entry; and, had to key in the same Find text again every time. That probably added ten times more time over just clicking Back and the next link, as Netscape allowed. With Netscape, I was able to zoom through irrelevant pages much faster, without ever needing to take my hand off the mouse (until the next topic of course). Since I credit the quickness of locating my search words in WebPages as my success in both verifying newly found particulars and in stumbling across all new ones, I wouldn’t have what I have today on my website if the library had implemented Internet Explorer a year earlier.
We need to realize that Microsoft isn’t the real innovator of good and better ideas. They just mostly steal all the real innovator’s ideas, then use their money to put them out of business, and make it their own. That’s basically what Bill Gates and IBM did in the early 1980s entering into the PC market. And, Microsoft’s nitwitted priorities are fluff and “change it just to change it” over productivity for the user. Plus, any typical American underhanded thing they can do just to make everyone buy all new hardware and all new software programs (including the loss of all prior programs and files) every couple of years, they’ll do it. If the public and the news media weren’t so controlled by who has the money, and have such blind faith in same, then everyone would be having a much better computer and Internet experience today.
I’m not certain, but I’ll betcha real innovator companies happen to also be more honest and more for the customer, than companies who just got lucky, where false image, fluff, and greed to the max is priority. I mean, really, is there any “user” out there that actually requests that the new slower over-plumbed operating system antiquates all their old programs and files? I mean, if a bridge falls in the river, then the engineering company responsible needs to be able to bring up the original drawings, but can’t because they were drawn in the early 1990s, and the software program went out of business years ago, and therefore the old program and/or files purposely won’t come up in the newer / competitive programs.
Of course, Obama and everyone else probably thinks that everyone having to buy all new every few years and having to take all that extra time in having to learn all the new ways of just doing the same old thing, will help the economy by creating more jobs. Well, then why don’t we just knock down all our buildings and tear up all our highways? That will also create lots of new jobs, won’t it? Both during the tearing it down and the building it back. “Dumb”: I’m fighting a losing battle against it.
If you want to know what loads and runs fast, it’s old programs from the 1980s, that did probably 99% of what we do on word processors, databases, spreadsheets, etc. today, formatted on a separate partition on a new computer. That’s what runs fast. Plus, I don’t know what new webpage creation programs do today, but they sure are making files with pictures and videos run probably ten times slower than they did five years ago. If I had a business that was trying to attract customers, I wouldn’t want it to run ten times slower on their machines, just so I can “think” I’m impressing them with the unknown knowledge that I’m using the latest (but, not greatest) in website design; just so I can say in my private office that I’m keeping up with the Joneses. Lots of it is so bad that I have to waist even more initial time having to click somewhere on the site to gain focus, so my scroll-wheel works on their website. And, half the time, clicking to gain focus, just hyperlinks me to another page; just so I have to hit Back just to wait all over again for the slow website to reload. “Dumb”: It’s totally everywhere today. Downloading the latest Firefox and accessories doesn’t improve it much either.
Have you seen the latest Google Search results: They put your Search results way down the page, so you’ll be more inclined to click one of their paid customer links first, which is usually always less of what I want. “Greed to the max”: It’s just going to make life worse for the vast majority. I used to have the Weather Channel.com load on my startup, so the current temperature displayed in my system tray. Nope, not anymore; because, they purposely make it load probably 100 times slower on startup, just to entice me to pick their option of downloading their toolbar, which overwhelms my browser window (opening the left pane every time) trying to sell me something on every Google search I make. I am not constantly using a computer to constantly buy everything I can in this world! And, the exact same 100 times startup slowness still occurs even after I load the crummy toolbar. (You see, I can’t really run any other programs properly until it’s completed its long loading cycle, which prompts me twice before it continues it’s loading, so I can’t go to the bathroom and come back for it to be all finished.) Computing today just isn’t as nice as it was just a few years ago. So, I assume it’s just going to get worse. George W. Bush dropped the government lawsuit against Microsoft right after he went into office, just because Bill Gates is a rich guy. Obama doesn’t seem to know anything. So, a dreary future I expect to see.
Same advice as before: Just have the government take over all the monopoly companies, by paying the owners a handsome fee, just to keep them from screwing us all so much. I don’t see any other way.
Church leaders’ feathers are rattled:
O’Reilly told 11-24-09 that Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox Church leaders have all gotten together recently (11-20-09) and created the Manhattan Declaration (http://manhattandeclaration.org/), putting their foot down against, among other things, sex outside of marriage: “promiscuity.” He told 11-23-09 that they are even planning to “break the law” to support their endeavor.
Well, you know that natural desire is going to still come upon men as they look upon the face of a fair maiden; therefore, ethically, today’s churches should honor the “perfectionism” of the Taliban and their mandatory use of the burqa. I mean, why should church leaders complain about sex outside of marriage, and deny people the Antichrist artificial salvation cop-out of communion, when they provoke such by no mandatory burqa law?
Could it be the 12,000+ post cards I mailed back in October to all top religious leaders, have had anything to do with the crackdown? Well, if my stuff is all “crazy” and untrue (as some still assert without really reading it), then they wouldn’t find it a threat. But, if my sources are not made up, and my commentary is fitting, then they sure are helping me prove how the anti-sex and pro-cop-out mainstream church of today, could be no better described than the “Antichrist” in the Book of Revelation. It sure “fits” anyway. But, how could that much Bible deception and ignoring of certain very pertinent English verses get by a society full of smart humans? – That’s what’s still going to be the one thing that’s hard for the media to believe. I realize that some of the Bible sources I use are going to be more foreign to laypeople; but, I don’t know any better way to present my case. And, there’s no way CNN is going to do a story based on “just” trusting me, without researching and verifying it’s validity. But, they don’t really research stories, they only “ask” the religious leaders they “trust.” So, there’s definitely a very large catch-22 in the way.
Plus, there’s the question if it would be good to get a society wanting to move away from the marriage standard, to be allowed to more follow the Goldenrule teachings of Christ; and, if guaranteed child support from our government would be better for our children, rather than the child degrading, crime causing, suicide leading, etc. method used today of trying to get it from deadbeat fathers, as told in my 08-05-01 letter. (It’d work like how the school system works.) And, the question if fathers would get to spend more time with their kids if they didn’t have to stay away just because they don’t want to have to work two jobs just to pay the child support. Well, I think Obama’s going to have to fail really bad on his health care reform idea before he realizes that my 11-11-08 economic advice is best.
The Catholic Bishop told O’Reilly that rape or incest is no justification for abortion. That’s simply because it wasn’t his daughter that came home raped and badly beaten. None of those Catholics care for the sanctity of life when they eat meat. It’s all just another cop-out trying to fool God into thinking they are worthy of the Kingdom of Heaven, so the real Goldenrule for mothers who were raped can be ignored. But, if I’m smart enough to know the trick, then don’t you think God could be also?
Again, when it should go from the mother’s wishes to the unborn’s wishes (not the Catholic’s wishes), is when the unborn starts having wishes: whenever that part of the brain begins to start working.
To talk a little Thanksgiving turkey: I don’t mean to sound so self-centered, but religious leaders need to just make me their “one” religious leader / advisor, simply because I’m so much smarter and so much more honest than the rest of them all. Only then can things start to “fit” together. However, if they plan to “break the law” against me, be sure to tell ‘em to smile for the several FBI cameras that constantly monitor around my place.
I noticed this:
http://www.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/localnews_story.asp?z=12&a=427357 (Post-Bulletin), Bill O'Reilly: America's faithful are angry, will secular leaders listen?:
11/30/2009 7:40:01 AM
It took a while, we're talking decades, but finally some American religious leaders say they are fed up. A few days ago, a faith-based group including Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York issued a scathing indictment of secularism in the USA entitled "The Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience."
The document, which includes input from Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox Christians, basically says that Christian values are under siege in America and people of faith need to act aggressively to stem the tide. The declaration goes so far as to encourage civil disobedience and uses Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. as a model for that.
Why now? Why are some Christian leaders coming out of the sacristy at this point in time?
It’s because “I” mailed out 12,000+ post cards in later October about the Baptism-Cotytto connection. And, not because some crazy fool just made up something, but because “the truth” burns. I’ve got it. I like it. It’s good for society and the future of mankind (not in what we’ve been “taught,” but in logic). And, it’s not going away, nor can the evidence it be erased. They can and (since I’m correct about who the real “Antichrist” is) they will try, but eventually the truth will come down the pike. They are all welcome to their opinions about abortion, but this sex lie is going to end. They need to either admit that Jesus wasn’t the irrational anti-sex bigot that they portray; or, they need to separate themselves from Jesus altogether, and state that it’s just them who wish to retain their anti-free-sex views, not Jesus. But, there’s just way too much money to be made fooling the public, telling them that they support Jesus. So, they’ll keep preaching the name Jesus, while maintaining the lies. They are literally worse than dirt, because dirt doesn’t retain a major lie. And, Jesus even foretold their coming. I’m personally very, very impressed with Jesus Christ. They’re probably all now turning into atheists; but again, retaining the lies because there is so much money to be made telling the sinner what he wants to hear.
http://www.bradenton.com/letters/story/1881622.html (Bradenton Herald), Declaration reaffirms many truths:
On July 4, 1776 the Second Continental Congress adopted a statement announcing the independence of the 13 colonies, then at war with Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence proclaimed the American colonies to be independent states. On Nov 20, 2009 another declaration was published. This statement does not assert freedom from rule, but freedom under rule.
The Manhattan Declaration informs civil authorities that those who sign will adhere to their convictions and “under no circumstance abandon their Christian consciences.” The truths revealed in this declaration may not be self-evident, but are Spirit manifested, held dear, and avowed to have proceeded from their Creator.
Yeah? How come our “Creator” ordered the number one sacrament of Baptism, knowing its connection with the classical times religious deity of promiscuous sex???
The Manhattan Declaration: They say it’s the first time ever that the Catholics, the Protestants, and the Eastern Orthodox have all gotten together to fight a common enemy. But, you media people still think my findings aren’t worth looking into.
Hannity and religious leader types probably say it just like this:
“Cotytto’s priests’ name was the same base word form of Baptism in the same language the New Testament was written; and, they even performed the Baptizing watering ritual. No, I honestly don’t see how Cotytto had anything to do with Baptism. That’s proof conclusive that that Mr. Critical guy’s just another loon.” And, I’m sure Hannity could say it just that way and Fox News listeners would fully agree.
(Hannity is definitely not saying “Thank you sir, may I have another?” on this one.)
Baptism:
It didn’t just mean sex, it meant sex with multiple partners.
Here’s what sexually active singles should be doing about Baptism:
http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/Co/Cotytto.html (Webster’s Online Dictionary), COTYTTO, “Dancing Men (who are spelling ‘COTYTTO’)”:
Don’t forget to state something more for the defenseless animals, Mr. Critical:
http://www.bakersbox.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=BK&Category_Code=PB, ProBar, “7. Why is the Probar lower in protein than other bars?”:
Protein is the body’s last choice for fuel! Carbohydrates are the undisputed first pick. Fat is a distant second. When the body is forced to use protein for fuel it results in toxicity. The amino acid chains in protein must be removed, liberating the calories for use as fuel. This process, called de-amination, results in the production of ammonia, and urea. This process is not only toxic, but is also very inefficient when compared to the simple assimilation of carbohydrates. HIGH PROTEIN MEANS LOW ENERGY, compared to carbs.
Tastes great too.
FOX NEWS aired and stuck it at the top of their website (11-16-09 ) SLAUGHTER HOUSE VIDEO:
http://video.foxnews.com/11654798/warning-graphic-video
I can’t believe it! And, Fox News of all people. Someone there must be worrying about their soul allowing that kind of truth to be seen.
Believe it or not:
Like the actual slaughter is not cruelty. The fact that they warn about it being “Graphic” tells me that when the truth comes down the pike, there will be a vegetarian law, as what is truly disturbing to the human will eventually be stopped. But today, ignorance still rules for the most part.
Mr. Critical – There’s what I should look like:
(And, maybe even Fox News eventually.)
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/