Subject:  “Bad boys, bad boys...

…whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you” in Matthew 5:25?  That would be to compensate anyone and everyone who has a legitimate cause for anger against you.  In your Afterlife, not Paul, not the disciples, but “Jesus” says you’re gonna pay!   And the only way to bypass this “prison” is by direct restitution to the exact victim or your sin(s), according to “Jesus” in Matthew 5:24.  “You go to school and learn the Goldenrule; so, why are you acting like a bloody fool?”  It’s solely because your pastor / priest has cop-outs to overrule “Jesus,” just for greater secular tithings.  And if you’re an atheist, it’s because the church has added “sins” where there’s no “victim” eligible for reconciliation / restitution, allowing historic secular gain to overrule fairness.

 

11-18-08

 

So, what are you going to do when the Afterlife cops come for you?  You have no choice: You’re going to suffer equally at that point; just like it is when you get arrested in secular society.  So both “Jesus” and I suggest you find the victims of your sins “quickly,” before they cannot be found, to be reconciled with (settle / resolve) to their satisfaction.

 

I know you trust your pastor / priest a lot more than you trust me, but all I’m telling you is that you’d better learn how to instead trust “Jesus” over your pastor / priest.  And I’m totally aware I’m not making any friends speaking about truth, to my intended audience.

 

Is Hannity “saved”:

Hannity, why do you (really) think the Goldenrule is what’s wrong with the world today, when Jesus tells that It’s what will “save” the world someday?  You see, Jesus is not only about “saving” you for your Afterlife, but is also about “saving” the tangible world.  And both work together as in what good you “do” for the world equates with what good will be done for you in your Afterlife.  But, Protestants and wealthy Catholics seem to believe that “saving” only applies to their own selfish Afterlife.  But “Jesus” stated that “doing” good things while living is the only way to “save” yourself for an Afterlife (Matt. 25:34-46) (which does not preclude end-able Fair Afterlife Punishment).  Also:

Matt 7:14,15:

Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.  Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.

–Those who preach cop-outs which indirectly do much more harm than good.

Matt 7:21-24:

Not everyone who says to Me, “Lord, Lord,” shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.  Many will say to Me in that day, “Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?”  And then I will declare to them, “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!”  Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock:

So you have to do Matthew 25:34-46.

Matt 24:11:                                                                                                                      

Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many.

Sounds like an overwhelming number.  Something so large that is in need of Jesus’/God’s warning.  So, “many” false prophets is not the Mormon Church.  “Many” is the Catholic and mainly the Protestant churches.  (I’m not saying the Mormon Church is right, I’m just saying they all don’t even number to 1% of all Christians.)  “Many” who are deceived is not just the few Mormon followers, it’s the vast “many” Catholic and mainly Protestant churches, requiring necessary warning from God.

Matt 24:24,25:

For false christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders, so as to deceive, if possible, event the elect.  See, I have told you beforehand.

 

Following cop-outs is the main major evil, but the traditional teaching that sex outside of marriage is the most evil of all sins (to better induce to that very difficult direction) has caused the total corruption of what doing good really means.  Mix it with some cop-outs, and people who don’t have sex outside of marriage can use it as a base to justify (balance out) doing real wrongs that hurt real innocent people!  They won’t admit it, and their followers don’t even realize it, but the church’s traditional sex condemnations (out of marriage) is the number one reason for today’s vast leaning toward atheism (because of the post-pill era).  That entire crowd would be “allowed” to become very desirously religious, and would therefore much more lean towards (real) “good,” if today’s church disseminated the truth about what Jesus really said about sex and marriage.  So like do it.

 

If the Catholic Church is lacking sources to substantiate that Jesus was against marriage and for promiscuous sex – caused by the vast traditional cover-up of the subject – then ask me because I have a ton of sources.  Or, wait and I’ll eventually get them published on my website (if I don’t die in the meantime, e.g., auto accident, government corruption, skinhead, etc.).  I worry though because I have so many sources that I fear no one will be able to see the forest for the trees.  Killing me before I’m done would place even an idiot in trillions of times more Afterlife Suffering than killing anyone else, as it would affect trillions of future human beings.  (Again, my big talk just sort of falls into place: I really didn’t plan it this way.)

 

I mean, I’ve known several guys who have attractive wives / girl friends, that have to constantly hold in their real feelings, wants and emotions, knowing that she will leave them if they don’t.  Like there are simply times where everyone gets into a bad mood, but if the woman is in a good mood, and the man is in a bad mood, he has to do everything he can to not show it, like having to sell his entire soul, or he’s out.  So there is a tremendous amount of suffering in this world caused by the marriage / monogamy standard.  When many of these guys eventually blow, it’s called domestic violence.  Ask the courts, the dockets are filled with it.  The Mystery Mother Harlot allegorically told in Revelation chapters 17, 18 and 19 is an excellent description of this most evil marriage / monogamy standard.  You see, women are “human,” therefore are excessively selfish; so, when a woman can control a man by withholding sex until certain conditions are met, especially with very strong support from the mainstream church, then there are “many” conditions she has available for her liking.

 

2 Tim 4:3,4:

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires [faith alone, and marriage as a prerequisite for sex: straight to Heaven with no or less work, and financial support for our children because God’s free food and building resources are missing to motivate all to work for the rich man], because they have itching ears [rich only want to hear what’s good for the rich], they will heap up for themselves teachers [today’s priests and preachers]; and they will turn their ears away from the truth [faith alone is the way instead of the Goldenrule], and be turned aside to fables [“miracle” cop-outs is their only hope].

 

Well, how can a church exist today without money?  And what rich person is going to give you money if you don’t say it as he wants to hear it?  Huh?  Huh?  (Very good argument.)

 

Tell me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think there are any churches today that say or even believe they don’t preach “sound doctrine.”  But Paul could tell that there would be.

 

2 Tim 3:17-4:1:

3:17that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.  4:1I charge you therefore before God and Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom:

So it’s like God and Jesus are the ones that should and will be doing the judging; so, we don’t have to, and shouldn’t because of our vast bias, corruption and ignorance.  So the judgment is like both soon, whenever the church decides to follow only the Goldenrule, and in the promised future perfect utopia Kingdom.  (Hannity thinks a perfect utopia is where the vast majority labor hard for the benefit of the few.  So, you can leave me dead if that’s the case.)  But information only will occur when the church accepts the venus of Jesus’ Goldenrule, but punishment is what Hannity can look forward to, before he’s allowed to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.  You see, punishment causes people to see the evil that they are, and reconciles with the victims of their sins, thereby making one worthy for the Goldenrule based Kingdom of Heaven.  Otherwise, if you let guys like Hannity in without correction, they’d quickly corrupt the place.  Then it wouldn’t be a happy place.  It’d be the slave driven place that the vast majority are victim of today.  And Hannity would make sure that the rich would just come up with even more ways to create jobs for the poor to make their ends-meet, via trickle-down economics, instead of allowing the poor to just utilize all of God’s original free food and free building resources, that Lewis and Clark reported noteworthy in their journey (1804-1806) through “uncivilized” areas, and that the civilized lands “eastward of the Mississippi” (the then United States) was definitely not like that.  And, eastward of the Mississippi hadn’t been civilized that long (Daniel Boone crossed the Cumberland Gap with settlers in 1775).  So what’s free from God goes quick in our standard work for money conditions.  Attestant is Revelation 6:5,6: the third seal.

 

The reason for today’s increasing atheism:

“I got a little sugar baby down the road. She’s sittin’ on ready and rockin’ on go. We’ll dance up a storm and later on tonight, we’ll be workin’ on doin’ all the wrong things right.” –Finally Friday, George Jones, 1992.

As long as the church allows the tradition idea that sex outside of marriage is “wrong,” atheism should continue to increase.  Especially in the minds of those who strain for honesty.

 

People aren’t going to accept God if God condemns them for the things that God strongly programmed into them (sexual desire).  “Truth” is going to find strong conflict, as saving face for church leaders is priority; so, I don’t ever see a solution in the future, causing an eventual 100% atheist society, where the Goldenrule isn’t even a known concept, that you can easily perceive in lots of today’s movies.  I mean, the Goldenrule sometimes comes up in conversation around “good” people, but only when they are trying to get someone else to abide by it.  If you tell someone to abide by God’s Goldenrule when they mainly know God as the all powerful dude who condemns them for their natural and society-accepted sexual desires, then they might purposely do the opposite of the Goldenrule just for spite.  It’s like revenge now while you’re alive, before you have to suffer in Hell for eternity.  I can attest to this from the atheists I’ve known.  They can get pretty mean over every dumb thing they’re wrong about.

 

“Education” for the sexless Catholic clergy:

For people with normal libidos, having sex is like needing to blow your nose, and blowing it.  And, yes, they need to blow their nose with lots of people they meet and see – God doesn’t seem to limit it to just one person.

 

I’ve always liked atheist as they are so much smarter than everyone else:

http://www.religioustolerance.org/worldrel.htm, RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD:

How can all those others sense and worry about something that’s not even there?  Since God’s not talking to us daily through the sky then that means God isn’t there?  And if we don’t trust cop-out Bible interpretation, then that means other intelligent parts of the Bible couldn’t be right either.  God couldn’t be a different kind of intelligence, because we humans are the only ones who can know and sense everything.  Just because a computer can do things a human can’t, has to mean that a human can do everything a computer can do.  That makes sense.  Since cars can go faster than humans, that mean humans can now run as fast as cars.  Right?  I’m a smart college professor, and can figure this kind of stuff out.  And, if a human can’t run as fast as a car, then smart cars will know that humans can’t exist.  It’s impossible!

 

What’s sickening:

What’s sickening is not giving to the poor and needy, even if sometimes they just use it for drugs or alcohol.  What’s sickening is like if this $700 billion bail out mostly goes to the fat cat executives who already make millions.

 

Sympathy for skinheads and far-right prejudice bigots:

They have been shattered by the realization of the actual highest implementation of fairness between races, and who knows what.  I believe the psychologists tell that the correct sequence for the human animal is shock, denial, depression, anger, then finally acceptance.  That “acceptance” being at the end, can make a world of difference for the betterment of a future world.

 

A Fox News radio host assured us the day after the election that things really haven’t seemed to change.  He explained how he finally noticed that he still has his house, he still has his car, job, places to eat, etc. suggesting that the realization of a President Obama may not really be the end of the world.  Of course “just” believing me would have made the transformation much easier, but learning the hard way is at least learning.  “Dumb”: nothing yet has been proven to easily overrule it.  Maybe someday they’ll have a pill or something.  If the U.S. today had a pill that could be formulated to control the human mind, they’d make it so 90% of the population slave two full times jobs just to serve the rich and lucky.  When the rich and lucky had enough stuff, I guess we’d have to adjust many of the pills so workers walk off cliffs, as we could never allow them to share in the wealth.

 

O’Reilly says ignorance is the best policy (typical Republican):

O’Reilly dislikes Heidi Klum’s racy TV commercial for Guitar Hero World Tour video game.  He worries that sexy commercials will harm our children, and that knowledge of reality will injury them when they go out into this big world.  Don’t listen to this guy.  He’s very educated, meaning he really can’t think outside the box.  Sure, if you need to know about existing facts of some kind, he should be great to talk to (when he’s not bias, or in spin mode); but, if it has anything to do with policy toward the ever-changing, ever-developing progression of ethics, he is unable to comprehend unless it meets with the standard he grew up with.  He’d say it’s the traditional standard that goes back to Christ, but “one” person is showing that that standard has been corrupted.

 

I think when someone can well “absorb” a lot of material in a short amount of time, their mind becomes so engulfed that the towering flood of knowledge / understanding disallows them to reckon / suppose outside that box: outside the scope of their overpowering fixating instructions.  Which comparably seems to confer with superior explanation skills.  So, what I’m trying to say is, to ponder further, I think one has to like float silently upon the waters, instead of having the weight of the entire pool atop his head… like if you dropped a quarter down by the drain… and like swam down to get it… and like stayed down there the rest of your life… and like somehow not dying. … Well, you know what I mean.

 

(I can be rolling along pretty good then all of a sudden lose it.)

 

I think political, media and religious leaders all conform to the above analogy, as they don’t get to their positions unless they can artificially impress, which “explains” why improvements come rarely, and why mistakes and regressions are rampant when they “think” they’re able to think outside the box.  They are the ones who run things, and nothing is going to change it.  I would / will have to constantly write commentaries, or they’ll quickly drift back to stupid.  If it wasn’t true, I wouldn’t have so many good points.

 

Fair and Balanced news asked people on the street to comment on Veterans Day:

When they asked Mr. Realistic, he said: “Well, I just want to thank our veterans for all they’ve done, and I also want to let our brave soldiers today know that I support their killing of women and children so I can live in safety.”  They didn’t air that one for some reason.  Too realistic and honest, I guess.

 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/11/20081111-2.html (The White House), President Bush Attends Rededication Ceremony of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum, (Quote from speech by President Bush 11-11-08):

And I want people to listen to what he said. He said, "If you think you're right, fight your heart out." That ought to be the motto of the modern United States military. You think you're right, and you're fighting your heart out for the sake of peace and freedom, and we thank you for it. (Applause.)

You’re welcome.  I’ll keep up the good work as I do think I’m right.  Thanks for the inspiration Mr. President.

 

The best way for peace:

If Fair and Balanced news forced Hannity to talk about the Amiriyah civilian shelter as much as he did about Bill Ayers.

 

Bossy the cow:

Lookie there:  Her hair is starting to grow back where she had her accident which scraped off the top layer of skin.  And her broken leg she got last spring is about ready for the splints to be taken off.  It’s been a long and difficult struggle.  But, unfortunately, now happens to be the time for her to go to slaughter, so we can eat!

 

Obama filling governmental positions:

Has he found anyone yet to head the Department of Criticism?  It would be a department that would fix a lot of things… but would initially make a lot of enemies.  Just let the people vote for it.  Wait, second thought, don’t let the people who would learn about their errors and evil vote for it, let God and all animals walking to slaughter right now vote for it.

 

Yeah, I don’t think Obama would have to worry about the Clintons assassinating him if they only headed the Department of State, simply because an assassination wouldn’t make her President.  That’s planning things better.

 

Gas prices continue to decrease:

I think I have a pretty good grip on what’s really going on in the news; but, I admit, I can’t figure out these extremely low gas prices if they continue to fall.  What if I’m also wrong about Hannity and O’Reilly?  I’d better take a nap now and rest my head.

 

Self-punishment to circumvent Fair Afterlife Punishment (continued):

I think one of the reasons why Jesus said self-punishment wouldn’t work in Matthew 5:23-26 (where only restitution to the actual victim works) is because you have to be victimized.  And you’re not really being victimized in self-punishment.  It’s got to be something you really, really don’t want, and if you’re able to do it to yourself, then it’s not the same.  Going to prison for a crime (against an innocent person) – that’d probably work (depending on the severity), because you don’t want to go to prison.  And if you did want to go to prison, then that just means you like the three guaranteed meals, the shelter, and the sex.  So, then you’ll just have to suffer in your Afterlife.  (I think you’d still like sex better being free in an open-sex society.  But, today, maybe you’re right.)

 

Many churches oppose gay marriage:

That’s shows a good example how they their faith is not in the Goldenrule, but only in cop-outs.  They think sticking their nose in other people’s private business, with no regard, no simple / common respect for the others’ personal interest, which begets no victim, is their ticket into Heaven.  But Matthew 25:34-46 and 5:23-26 says it’s not, as it tells that you can have all they gay sex you want but as long as you do the Goldenrule you’re saved (25:34-40), and unless you beget a (real) victim in your gay sex, you’re not going to Suffer Equally (5:23-26) in-between.  If we spend all our time trying to fix problems which really aren’t problems then it will simply create more problems.  Does that make sense above?  If you don’t do the crime (beget a victim) then you won’t have to do the time?  And, there’s no balancing act here.  These two parts of Jesus Afterlife Judgment teachings are separated, as the reward of good deeds and the suffering of bad deeds are separated, and is told as such by Jesus in Matthew 5:24 that the gift does not amend the crime (a good deed, even to God, doesn’t outweigh a crime against a human).  Plus, I’ve found valid corruption / error in every Bible word / allegory that supposedly condemns homosexuality (between adults), even the ones in the Old Testament.

 

A dialogue between Barack Obama and Osama bin Laden:

Obama:

We’re gonna find ya’ and kill ya’!

bin Laden:

Why?

Obama:

Because you killed innocent people on 9/11.

bin Laden:

Your country killed innocent Muslims.

Obama:

Well… then we’re going to kill ya’ because it’s all a game and we want to win.

What else could Obama rationally say?  Therefore, I strongly suggest that Obama not pursue the killing of bin Laden, unless bin Laden makes another threat against the United States; because, when you start over with a new American President, especially a solid liberal, our enemies should give him the benefit of the doubt, until he blows it by threatening the terrorists.  Obama has stupidly threatened bin Laden, which just fuels al-Qaeda to continue their plans of terrorism, but Obama could probably retract that before he becomes President, and instead make an agreement that he won’t pursue bin Laden unless and until he makes another threat or attack.  I mean, the ONLY moral justification for killing bin Laden is because he killed innocent people.  But, since we have and still do kill innocent Muslins, THERE’S ABSOLUTELY NO ETHICAL DIFFERENCE!  Therefore, Obama is never going to have a legitimate winning argument against al-Qaeda unless he does what I (only) say above.  Remember, once Obama crosses the line and really begins to pursue bin Laden, then there’s no turning back from the threat of terrorism from al-Qaeda for the next four to eight years.  Now, I’m getting tired of saying that I’m the only person in this world with enough brains to be able to figure this out, but it’s true, so hopefully it’ll be the last time.  I know the extremely dumb and ignorant America people aren’t going to understand it.  I suggest letting me explain it to them, as I claim to be the best in making enemies of the dumb.  And, I’m already a nobody, so I have nothing to lose.  Or, present a hidden deal with bin Laden, and don’t inform the American public, like President Bush probably did.  That way you can still rant and rave about bin Laden but he would know you’re just trying to keep your job, so to prevent some subsequent President from changing the deal.  I more suggest the first scenario, where I explain it to the public, because even just saying the wrong thing can still cause problems; especially in the continued fueling of a very dumb American public, which can very well lead to the changing of the agreement at some point in the future.  Read again the above dialog example to see why President Bush never wanted talks with our enemies.  He wouldn’t want to be stopped at line 4.  Another thing you may not realize is that when we don’t have ethics on our side, because we have killed innocent Muslims, it doesn’t matter if you kill ten bin Ladens, al-Qaeda will continue to have a reason to do the same to us, for the SAME EXACT moral basis!  Unless you plan to kill every Muslin in the world.

 

So, I write this now so I can tell you I told you so later.

 

Make the same deal with the Taliban.  Tell’em if they don’t attack us, we won’t attack them from this point.  If they can re-blend back into a diverse society, then likely their Old Testament points of view (burkas, beards, etc.) can remain points of view (Freedom of Speech) and not become advantageous to conquer in violence.  Let me have dialog with their leaders and I’m sure the Goldenrule would eventually religiously win.  (Of course, why would you allow that, the Goldenrule hasn’t won over here yet.)

 

Further, I’d show your willingness to start over by pulling out of Iraq on January 20th.  Hopefully there will be a lot more Iraqis willing to be police once the Iraqi people can’t attribute them to the United States.

 

And, if we’ve ever killed an innocent person in Afghanistan, then we’ve ruined our ethical reason for being there also, and should pull out the same day.  Otherwise, people there would also be justified in killing us, and we would not be morally justified in defending ourselves.  Do I have to repeat again about the 1983 Russia (putting the show on the other foot) example?

 

In other words: If we can’t stop our killing of innocent people to stop the killing of innocent people, then we don’t belong getting involved in any conflict.

 

Two points of view:

You see, since there wasn’t all this violence in Iraq before the Americans invaded, if you (an Iraqi) just lost your wife or son in an insurgency bombing, you’re going to wish the Americans weren’t around, and should go.  But the Americans think that if we leave, then there won’t be anyone to stop all the insurgency wanting the Americans out.  A victimized Iraqi is not going to think that the Americans should stay to stop all the people who want to kill them.  They’re going to “realize” the truth much more after they become a victim of it.  Only Americans are the one’s who think we are doing those people so much good by staying there.  I got it: Let’s hand over Iraq to Russia or China to police.  The fact that we wouldn’t proves that we’re not still there for the good of the Iraqi people.  That’s just the current mind cop-out for President Bush, to help him “find comfort” with God.  If Obama follows it, that just means he’s gullible.

 

Help!  Someone, quick, bring up the Anna Nicole Smith case again:

Newt Gingrich announced that he’s running for President for 2012 on Hannity and Colmes 11-12-08.  I thought: Oh-no! – is that now all we’re going to hear about for the next four years… where there won’t be any other news?  We haven’t even had two weeks of relief yet.  Let’s keep that hush, okay?

 

Could all these new casinos be the root cause of this current financial disaster?

I have personally known people who have blown the mortgage payment at the casinos (trying to not blow a payment on the car).

 

Bill Ayers interviewed on Good Morning America 11-14-08:

To justify his bombing U.S. sites, he asks: “And had we killed or injured anybody, I’m sure it would have been devastating for everyone, not only them and us. But, my point is that in a period when 2000 people a week are being murdered, how do you end that? What do you do?”  The answer is: By “explaining” why it’s wrong in a way that shows how dumb and evil they really are.  You first have to be smart enough to know how to correctly explain it, and second, most importantly, you have to have a solid, stable base definition separating right from wrong: “Never hurt an innocent person, and only those who hurt an innocent person should be hurt.”

 

You see, just knowing or sensing that war is wrong is only first-step in fixing the problem.

 

“What, do most Californians like think gay couples are going to have a lot of children?”:

Jay Leno can’t tell a joke that insults the intelligence of over half the population of California.  But I can.  So, who’s gonna get things said that fixes the real / major problems?  The Amiriyah civilian shelter or slant drilling:  Same with our trusted news media: They’re not allowed to make well know something that’s going to make over half the population of the entire country look like unfair / evil idiots.  But I can.  So, who’s gonna get things said that fixes the real / major problems?  The church would lose the sharing of wealth that goes their direction, if they said the Goldenrule is the only way to salvation according to “Jesus” in Matthew 25:34-46, and that restitution to the actual victim is the only way to circumvent Fair Afterlife Punishment, again, according the “Jesus” in Matthew 5:23-26, and inform that everything else is a cop-out.  But I can.  So, who’s gonna get things said that fixes the real / major problems? 

 

The answer is “me” ONLY.  Thank you, thank you.  No, throw quarters, not rocks, please.

 

California wildfires:

You see, I can’t really say much that will help prevent those kinds of problems that a good fireman doesn’t already know.  Other than maybe more education from our media.  Flood problems:  There are maps galore that show where these flood zones are.  More education from our media may be the answer to that one also.  More government regulations for realtors and developers may also help, either disallowing building in flood zones, or the mandated informing of buyers / residents before they buy / move into those areas.  Not in the fine print, but is big bold letters on one exclusive cover page.  People probably would benefit if they worked less hours that allowed more time to educate themselves on these matters.

 

Possibly churches are working too many hours to know certain word definitions:

http://www.answers.com/cop-out, “cop-out”:

1.  A failure to fulfill a commitment or responsibility or to face a difficulty squarely.

2.  A person who fails to fulfill a commitment or responsibility.

3.  An excuse for inaction or evasion.

Again, “Jesus” says the “commitment” the “responsibility” the “difficulty” is the Goldenrule.

 

I know you think Billy Graham knows more about it than me.  The direction the “sharing the wealth” goes explains why you think what you think.  Your I.Q. isn’t high enough to reckon anything else.  Tell me how I’m wrong!  The country’s highest I.Q.’s (e.g., college professors) “give up” and just become atheists, copping-out to the fact that something had to make everything, and that some kind of intelligence slightly guides it.

 

Bail outs:

I don’t care whether the government gives or not gives bail outs to large corporations.  It sounds good on the surface, but I might mention that if all large corporations end up getting bail outs, then that will lead to communism, because then it’s not private enterprise that’s paying the employees, it’s the government.  And I think that’s what communism is.  As long as harder jobs pay more (including the hardness of going to college), then it might work; but, the private enterprise of the U.S. has seemed to work the best in determining that.  But then not in Mexico.  So you decide what you want.  I only care about “sharing the wealth” from the very bottom up.  Lessening backstabbing competitions can be done via communism or by particular government paid (and guaranteed) rewards for certain kinds of technological or procedural achievements, then sharing the better with all businesses of the same kind.  With my economic plan, if competition puts someone out of business, then anyone can always fall back to their basic needs being met, so to many times rethink and/or retry other ideas to get themselves back on their feet again.

 

If times are telling that there are large amounts of employees that are fitting to be unemployed, then that just shows that it’s time for my “basic needs” paid by the government (start from the very bottom) idea to be implemented, which will more fairly balance all that out.  Again, if less people are needed to accomplish what we need done, then overall we will actually be better off if not everyone worked.  But, the way today’s system works, all those laid off people will have to come up with some kind of new scam or way to antiquate things that don’t need to be antiquated, to survive.  Like U.S. automobile manufacturers: They’ve had a reputation for years that they purposely build stuff to fail, to sell new cars more often.  Now it’s finally catching up with them.  I say if they’re going to continue it, let ‘em fall; but, if they want to shape up, bail ‘em out.

 

You see, with my economic plan, Zack and Miri don’t have to Make a Porno.

 

The First Amendment: Freedom of Speech:

It’s a law that forces the government to not do what they really, really want to do: to shut up people like me that correctly insult them.  And it’s funny how those same warmongers who believe they’re justified to kill innocent people so they can live, use the very important Freedom of Speech to justify war, anytime they get the chance.  That’s what the public thinks they’re talking about; but, the Freedom they’re really talking about is killing innocent civilians so they can be free to live.

 

They’ll tell God that the innocent person had to die so they could live.  But God will be telling them that the innocent person (say a child) is saying they thought it would be better if they could have lived instead of you.  So both think they had predominance over the other.  So I guess who will be punished is the party who mandated the actual killing, as well as who pulled the trigger.  So don’t send me to war to kill innocent people, because I’ll know the same will logically be happening to me in my Afterlife.  Since “fairness” dictates that Saddam Hussein had just as much right as we do to build nuclear weapons to defend his country, then every Iraqi soldier was an innocent victim.  Attestant to this would be the fact that if Iraq did have equal nuclear power as the U.S. has, then we wouldn’t have gone in and killed all those innocent people.  Don’t you hate logic?

 

In fact, if it wasn’t for somewhat of a balance of WMDs between countries, we’d have had World War Three, Four and Five by now using conventional weapons.  WMDs have definitely been keeping countries safe.  Too bad for Iraq that they didn’t have any.  If Obama ever accomplishes the impossible and rids the world of WMDs, then there will certainly be conventional world wars throughout the future (probably making WWII look small).  How could a guy who’s so articulate not realize this?  I guess because he’s not me (only).  It just shows that he doesn’t know what wars are really all about.  I.e., a “game.”  Because, it really doesn’t matter which dumb and evil leader is in charge of a population that is forced to work.  Or, tell me the real difference between whip motivation and no food, no water, no shelter motivation?  If they could add-in no air motivation they would.

 

Matthew 21:6-11 (NKJV): “The Triumphal Entry”:

6So the disciples went and did as Jesus commanded them. 7They brought the donkey and the colt, laid their clothes on them, and set Him on them. 8And a very great multitude spread their clothes on the road; others cut down branches from the trees and spread them on the road. 9Then the multitudes who went before and those who followed cried out, saying:
      “ Hosanna to the Son of David!
      ‘ Blessed is He who comes in the name of the LORD!’
      Hosanna in the highest!”
10And when He had come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, “Who is this?”
11So the multitudes said, “This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth of Galilee.”

This having the disciples take off their cloths so Jesus could ride into Jerusalem sitting on top of them, and the rest of His followers disrobe so He could trample over their clothes on the road path, has a very sexual connotation.  Five days later he was crucified by then minds like Pope Benedict XVI, Billy Graham, Hannity and O’Reilly.  Was it worth it?  Well, I can sure utilize it.

Compare Gospel of Thomas, 37:

Jesus said, “When you strip without being ashamed, and you take your clothes and put them under your feet like little children and trample them, then [you] will see the son of the living one and you will not be afraid.”

Translation: Let’s all get naked and party!

 

I just wonder what today’s atheist leaders (those who influence the others) would do if they realized how cool Jesus / God really is, so they / we can better target the real enemy.

 

Pope Benedict XVI can inform the world what Jesus really said about sex and marriage, or I can later.

 

I remember Billy Graham’s secretary mailed back my 1-27-98 paper saying she couldn’t give it to Billy because of his heath problems.  So I mailed it back to her saying I understood, so please give it to his son.  She mailed it back to me with another excuse why the son was too busy.  Well, if the Mr. Bigs aren’t going to even get this stuff, they I have to rely on… Fox News.  I personally think these top religious leaders just end up looking like idiots repeating all the cop-outs, to people who have read my stuff.  Of course, while the vast general public is still dumb, he still feels like he’s looking smart.

 

Jesus addressing His followers about the sequence and state prior to His Second Coming:

Matthew 24:9-12 (NKJV):

9“Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake. (pre-Constantine) 10 And then many will be offended, will betray one another, and will hate one another. (post-Constantine) 11Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many. (post-Trullo, 692 AD) 12And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold.”

Like explain to me how this hasn’t happened yet; or, has happened but is now rectified.  “Love” does grow cold between everyone else when you’re taught to sexually love only one via marriage / monogamy (otherwise you’re a slut, pervert or an A-hole).  As a result, woman constantly have to make sure every man they meet stays at arms length, and since men are condemned, “queer,” or aren’t men for being sexually attracted to other men, there’s no reason to not hate each other when there’s any kind of conflict.  The power of sexual love (or lack of it) controls just about any other kind of love between non-related adults; and, that’s who the vast majority are.  Of course, I’m talking to people who have only known the order of sexual love via marriage / monogamy, so you aren’t really able to know what Jesus and I are talking about.  Today’s practice of promiscuous sex and same sex love has nothing to do with religion / God, so it isn’t going to accomplish much, except to turn more and more away from religion / Christ / the Goldenrule.

 

Why do we have democracies and term limits?:

It’s all needed just to limit corruption and conservatism.  That’s all.  If you had a “dictator” that wasn’t corrupt and could really “continue” to think outside the box (by admitting error), then the people would be better off.  But, again, everyone would have to be as smart as me, and that’s just not reality, and there’s nothing I can say to just make future people naturally smarter.  It’d be like me trying to naturally prevent a ball that goes up from falling back down.  I can’t do it unless I can change the laws of physics.  I mean, if humans decided that it would seriously be good to put Pikes Peak in Kansas, then eventually Pikes Peak would be moved to Kansas; but, changing the laws of physics is a much harder challenge.  A solid church teaching of the Goldenrule with open-sex would prevent World War III and make everyone lots happier, but since people’s senses are still only hooked up to themselves, then it can never be totally perfect.  It’s like a non-cop-out teaching of the Goldenrule only for salvation, and the logical threat of Fair Afterlife Punishment can raise our present 2% Goldenrule to maybe 30%; and, open-sex can eventually make that 30% go to maybe 90%, but it will never be 100%.  The mutual touching part of sex (e.g., oral) will eventually get to the point where making others feel better will be what we will all be striving for in other aspects of life also (today called “perverted”), but never to 100%.  What may be key is the actual thought that you’re naturally sharing small amounts of bacteria and viruses, and that by doing so, will actual prevent diseases.  American Natives thought that sex with foreigners was “good medicine”; but, too much sharing of bacteria / viruses all at once is what killed most of them out.  But, amazingly, somehow they knew the correct principle, but lacked awareness of the one time problem of the New World situation and the drastic effects of a long separation all-of-a-sudden coming together.  Possibly the reason Europeans didn’t all die from these contacts is because of a very strong marriage standard.  But today the time’s right to say bye-bye to monogamy.  That’s why today’s STDs are the only real thing holding back progress.  So let’s get them cures going.

 

Or, lookie at this (this relates to an email I got):

http://www.garynull.com/newsarchives/AIDS%20Press%20Conference%20Release.pdf, The Great AIDS Fraud:

HIV has never been isolated from an AIDS patient and there are no conclusive studies to show it is the cause of AIDS-like symptoms. No proof exits that HIV actually destroys killer t-cells, which is indicative of an autoimmune disease. There is no antiretroviral drug that doesn’t also seriously compromise the human immune system and further threaten patients with other life-threatening illnesses. There is no conclusive research to prove that HIV is readily sexually transmitted—another claim made by Gallo without scientific evidence to support himself.

Is this real or bull?  To all my good friends at Fox News: Hannity, O’Reilly, Laura Ingraham, etc., please, I need your research expertise to find out if the above is correct or not.

 

 

I mean don’t research it all just for me, I’m sure there’s two or three other people out there who would like to know.  Otherwise, the world could end up becoming very promiscuous with this kind of talk spreading around.  So, either shut it down by addressing it, or let it roll.  Of course, if you come on and just say it’s incorrect without really researching it, then that could be a pretty bad sin.

 

Ad at Movies Tickets.com:

It’s too late if you’re a Protestant or Catholic.  Because you’ve got “faith alone” or “confession.”  The kid may have even forgotten about it (likely not), but add to the apology about $500 if you don’t want to get punched back during Fair Afterlife Punishment.

 

The three good reasons to commit suicide:

Well, I should say the three popular reasons for committing suicide:  (1) Heath problems.  (2) Financial problems.  (3) Love-life problems.  Well, Mr. Critical can only (and is the “only” one to) help everyone solve numbers two and three, with a government paid basis-needs solution, and an open sex program.  Others are the ones to turn to, to solve problem number one.  (Of course, it wouldn’t surprise me if I ended up having to also solve number one.)

 

Fist fight at famous Church of the Holy Sepulcher between monks:

I heard an “Obama” for every hit on one side, and a “McCain” for every jab on the other.  The election’s over people.  Learn to accept.  Thanks news networks for reporting.  It helped Jesus realize the need for a Second Coming, while peering down at the fight from the cross.

 

The gruesome monster:

That’s what a country looks like when it fights heavily within itself:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/:

It looks pretty sickly.  Probably coughs up a lot of phlegm during the day.  Hopefully there’s some“one” who could make it well.

 

At least the strangling streaks of the red devil have lessened in the past four years:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2004/:

The Second Coming of Christ:

People figure: If it doesn’t come via supernatural miracle, then it will come by someone who has all the answers to cause everyone to get along, and will educate us to optimize a future world full with happiness… but will do that by not explaining how “dumb” we all are.

 

The book: John McCain: The True American Maverick:

I couldn’t find it in my bookstore.  I was wanting to read about how he realistically threatened Russia with war, but later mavericked the truth.  The question is: would Fox News have asked the question if “I” hadn’t mentioned it?

 

How does one spell “traditional”?:

John McCain has a firm patriotic war ethic, supports a strong family value, and believes the rich and lucky should be able to keep their money.  Oh yeah, he can really think outside the box.

 

What else would it be for?  Glad to see other “experts” are persistent enough for four editions.  Well, we do have to go beyond the last four Presidents until we find one who didn’t bomb innocent people.  I guess Carter had a good things come to those who wait philosophy, which… “worked.”  So everyone “won” if you call “winning” a solution with absolutely no American casualties.  So that problem was “won.”  So could this administration like forget about it?  Probably not if the title of the book’s right.

 

The most important question:

“Her momma wants to know: am I’m washed in the blood or just in the water. Her daddy wants to know if I make enough to take his daughter, down the road: before he can let her go Down The Road.” –Kenny Chesney, 2008.
So in truth daddy pimps his daughter.  Because, this is a “dishonest prostitution” based society, that’s far to dumb to realize it; but, I think I’ll preclude getting punched really hard in the mouth by not mentioning the truth to “daddy.”  Yep, I think I’ll instead just realize how big of a lie and problem “dishonest prostitution” really is, instead of feeling the soreness of that truth with a busted jaw.  But, if I’m ever willing to take the hit just to also see how much irrational abuse my mind can take when his preacher explains to me how marriage is not prostitution, neither traditionally or today, it’ll be just for practice for when my stuff really gets disseminated.

 

How come I know all this stuff and none of you do?

 

Mr. Critical – Raisin’ some heck.

 

TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/