Subject: You know you make me want to…
SHOUT! Kick my heels up and SHOUT! Throw my hands up and SHOUT! Throw my head back and SHOUT! Come on now SHOUT! Come on now SHOUT! HEY EY HEY YA! … … … …!
11-7-08
Guess who won the big job? Hopefully there won’t be a thing to be critical about. Mainly never hurt an “innocent” person and everything’s okay with me. Otherwise, I’ll get the opportunity to admit I was wrong. Did I ever say I was a Democrat? I lean Democrat, but, it really doesn’t matter: I actually go for the person… as long as they push a strong Jesus-like “share the wealth” policy. So let’s bring $250,000 to $200,000 to $150,000 to $120,000 down to $60,000 a year. Ha, ha, ha! Sorry upper middle class, you ain’t gonna get to buy that new boat, as long as others are workin’ two jobs for less. Well, I don’t know what’s going to happen; but, I do have a full economic solution forthcoming. Something that has to happen someday, so why not now? (No, it’s not communism or socialism.)
O’Reilly is pretty smart. Smart to poop on! He says that early Christians “chose” to share the wealth; that they didn’t force anyone to. Therefore, our government should not “force” anyone to comply. A great “spin.” However, he’s forgetting how Jesus spoke strongly against harboring wealth (e.g., Luke 18:18-25), and if you’re a Christian, Jesus is master. Still, Jesus did not “force” people to follow His teachings: you just have to follow Him on your own if you’re a true Christian. So, if you run the government, and you’re a true follower of Christ, you’ll make laws supporting the sharing of wealth. So, O’Reilly is pinhead of the day, and obviously a true advocate for the Devil.
It still amazes me how it’s so obvious that today’s majority “Christians” are the true Antichrist, and how so unobvious it is to everyone else. Fear of not trusting in cop-outs in the culprit.
“Faith” based warmongers sure think “force” is the answer when it comes down to invading countries.
Of course, the early Christians never had control of any government to “force” sharing the wealth until the 4th century anyway. So let’s see what that ended up looking like:
Uh huh. And what’s the garb of the Pope?:
Very nice. Well, I’d say they did “share the wealth”… in their direction.
Hey buddy, who do you think Jesus would give that above wealth to?:
By the way, dude, did you know Lewis and Clark reported unusual vast quantities of free food and free building materials in the “uncivilized” lands? Don’t you feel better now, recalling all the hours you spent studying in school and all the jobs you’ve had up to now? You probably could have built ten houses by now in… uncivilized lands. Thank God for progress, eh? I’m just trying to tell you that you’re not the piece of dirt, all those wealthy people are! (But don’t tell anybody – I’ll be our little secret.)
I wonder if there’s heating in St. Peter’s Basilica in the winter. Then we could fill it with the homeless. Yeah… only if I’m conducting the service preaching the Goldenrule, and want to demonstrate how it works. Me, me, me! I’m so much closer to Jesus than the Catholics.
Self-punishment to amend sins:
Lots of people think that it would be fair if one does penance, true sacrifice, self-punishment, etc. for the absolution of past sins. I mean, making yourself suffer equally during your life to match (and therefore circumvent) assured Afterlife punishment, seems to make sense; but, Jesus says no. Matthew 5:23-26 says that you must reconcile directly with the past victims of your sins: your sacrifice / restitution must be paid directly to them, not a church or to somebody else, and not in self-punishment. Jesus uses the example of “leaving your gift [true sacrifice] there before the altar” to explain that you will still have to suffer equally in Fair Afterlife Punishment, until fairness has been accomplished to the direct victim. So you can torture yourself all you want, but the great embarrassment and “weakness” (really “strength”) of admitting you were wrong and will to pay restitution, must be shown to the actual victim. I recommend to not sin in the first place – “sin” that begets a “victim.” I recommend doing it while you’re on life’s way with them, because if they die, or you die, or they can’t be located, then it still doesn’t matter how much self-punishment you pursue, you’re still going to have to suffer equally in your Afterlife. So don’t even bother punishing yourself. Hey, don’t blame me: I don’t make the laws, I’m just telling them in honesty. I know this goes against a lot of Catholic beliefs, but when there’s a contradiction between Jesus and the church, Jesus is the correct one to trust. (None of this is even relevant to Protestant beliefs.) I mean Catholics can talk about contrition, etc., but none of it makes any difference when it comes down to fairness for the exact victim. “Sins” where there’s no outside victim is where church counseling can help a person to better their own life, but the law is written and is pithy enough to teach a solid “assured” kind of penalty for hurting any innocent person. Oh, Jesus also overrules any Old Testament (and/or pagan) alter absolution practices, as He is the prophesied savior in fulfilling the correction of past errors. I mean, if the Old Testament had it all correct, then why would there be a need for a prophesied Messiah? And a “second coming of Christ” doesn’t overrule Christ, it just manifests His original teachings, overruling only corruption and spin intended to tell the wealthy sinners what they want to hear. So the Catholic Church can bootlick to luxury, but I rather wish to “save” my soul. When I say that they are so dumb that they actually believe their own lies, I say it in most correctness.
Hey flatlanders:
Drive south on Colorado’s Million Dollar Highway from Ouray. That’ll make you want to be good and fear Fair Afterlife Punishment. Just repeat to yourself that it’s okay for animals to go to slaughter and die for your food, but it’s not okay for you to slip off that highway. I’d be a learnin’ experience.
Iraq war is officially won:
O’Reilly (with the No Spin Zone) announced right before the election that it’s official that we’ve “won” the Iraq war. So I guess that means our troops can come home. That’s great!
How’s Obama going to solve the terrorism problem?:
By killing bin Laden? No, because President Bush deserves the same, and several times more. By saying they just don’t like us allowing people to talk? No. To ignore it? No, because that’s not admitting fault. You see, the terrorism issue is entirely based and escalates on the fact that we are unable to admit our mistakes and evil. So, I don’t see how terrorism can ever end until we start admitting blame (or never hurting another innocent foreigner and let a lot of time pass). I’d start with slant drilling and the Amiriyah civilian shelter. But, since a rational person knows that no one is going to bring up those kinds of issues, it does worry me about continued terrorism. I realize that (correctly) admitting fault suggests that restitution would be in order, but why should “I” have to live in fear of terrorism just because I live in a country full of dishonest and dumb people, especially in the media and the Presidency?
Generically:
Obama should realize that when one has high communication skills and a great personality, people will agree with you, even when you’re wrong. Conversely, when one has bad communication skills and a lousy personality, practically everyone will quickly disagree with you when you’re wrong. Learning a lot when you’re wrong can build a stronger thinking ability when you get older.
Frustrated with your sex life?:
It’s because you’re married: You’ve “been there, done it” enough.
Some kook in San Francisco wants Joe the Plumber dead:
You see, that’s what you get when you become popular.
Palin tells Missourians 11-3-08 that they’re the best of America:
Doesn’t that like kind of insult all the other states?
Jump up and shout it now! Jump up and shout it now!
Is Mr. Critical good luck for Democrats?:
Since I started my emails back in March of 2006, the Democrats have been winning overwhelmingly (in November 2006 and now in 2008). Before March of 2006 the Republicans were winning, with the Iraq war being nothing but major problems for two years prior to March of 2006, where President Bush even got reelected. The reality and ethics there had really never changed except for that overall consensus that the Iraq surge not only worked but was a tremendous success. Bush has stopped any and all terrorist attacks on American soil, and this recent economic mess is because he supported trying to help the poor and needy (a liberal thing). So, maybe my stuff is affecting things, even though it’s not disseminated. It may be influencing the few who do influence the multitudes, making people overall “realize” things better (mainly concerning the war), possibly even subconsciously.
So the world has people who are dumb as rocks on one side, and dumb cop-out artists on the other side. That’s the two available choices. So if my stuff dies when I die, then I don’t see how trial and error can prevent World War Three, especially when we don’t learn from trial and error, thanks to “fair and balanced” news: we have the same thing that started the war with the Japanese hidden so people like John McCain can repeat the same top recommended firm threats against the Russians. You see, John has been taught by top minds that we need to “act” sincere in our firmness and determination, in a strong, realistic fear-of-death manner, to convince the Russians to stop doing something; but, every time we fail to understand that that fake, bullying, realistic “fear” can cause them to strike first, as did the Japanese. We are all too stupid to realize that the more “realistic” and “strong” the threat is, the better the chances of a defensive reprisal. Lot’s of people forget that the Jap’s orders were to bomb a large military base, not civilian Honolulu. There may have been some pilots who took some liberties, but their mission was not to bomb civilians like we did / targeted in Hanoi. Since the overwhelming majority of top minds like Fox News is “smarter” than me, then it’s just a matter of time before World War Three. Since Barack Obama will have “top” advisors, an antiwar President can become a pro-war President, or a strong threatener, very fast. I suggest to be “smarter” like me and don’t try to get things by threats unless you’re ready and willing to carry them out; especially with a kid on the playground who is only a few inches shorter than you, like Russia. If you want to stand tall like President Bush, you kick the books out the hands of kids several grades younger, like Iraq and Iran. If another country gave us a strong, realistic threat similar to the one John McCain gave to Russia, we’d begin the first attack, no questions asked. So since it’s all still a game of power, nuclear / biological war has to eventually come… as long as we remain “too smart” to realize it. After I wrote an article alerting people about it, Fox News did ask John McCain if he really planned on starting a war with Russia, and he said “no”; so, hopefully that small announcement sufficiently quenched the Russians’ fear and considerations of hitting us first. The reality is that all “top” minds seem to think that more violence and/or threats of violence, and the more meaner and serious it is said, is the way to protect one’s country, but history has shown repeatedly that it just escalates it. No one ever learns. Everyone thinks it’s their own new great idea to fight with bias violence instead of love, because only one side of the stories get published from past accounts. So let me know how “one” Jesus, and “one” person who exposes the “one” Jesus, is not the one to follow / disseminate? I know you all thing you’re not that dumb. That’s first-base of the problem. I know I’m not going to get your respect until I bootlick what “you” want me to say. I’m reminded of it every time I don’t hear from you. Sorry, ignoring me is not convincing me I’m wrong. Especially, when no one even tries to explain it to me. Again, first-base is you admitting I’m smarter than you. The fact that your selfish pride disallows you to do that, proves that none of you are “saved.”
With my theme, one can kill or threaten to kill a leader for hurting an innocent person, without lying or even acting mean. It would simply be the rational and sensible thing to do; so, dumb animal emotions would not be needed. It’s like if you had to kill one of your sons because he was about to kill your other son, you wouldn’t be happy about it, nor require anger to do what you needed to do. Before, you would have searched hard to find a love based solution. We “can” do the same with Iran, North Korea, and Russia… and Israel by offering to move them to West Texas. If they don’t take the offer as the righteous solution, then they should realize they’re on their own. Most fathers wouldn’t kill a son to save another where he equally loves both, so Jesus would agree to do the same concerning all aggression. Let their’s be the only violence and sin. I just say it would not be a sin if you did implement just violence; but, overall, since everyone has proved how dumb they really are concerning such matters, don’t listen to me, listen to Jesus.
There is only “one” thing to tell Russia concerning war issues, and that is: “One is never justified in hurting an innocent individual, and only one who hurts an innocent individual should / can be equally hurt.” And I haven’t heard John McCain or Barack Obama say that. Of course, I realize that in a country that does kill innocent people from time to time, we would look like a bunch of idiots if we said it.
We would, of course, not necessarily have to “equally hurt” people who hurts an innocent person, simply because (1) Jesus assures they will suffer equally in their Afterlife, and (2) we are too stupid to know how to deliver “eye for eye, tooth for tooth” without escalation and bias, therefore, again, Jesus overrules the Old Testament by telling us to forgive all others, love your enemies, and turn the other cheek. I am the only person who also realizes why this advice is so important: no preacher is allowed to tell everyone how “dumb” they really are, without losing their financial support. The world “needs” a preacher like me who doesn’t need tithings and/or friends.
Who’s the real Antichrist?:
What’s worse: a church like the Church of Satan that says it’s okay to hurt whoever you want, or a church that says you should do good deeds, and should never hurt an innocent person, but allow cop-outs saying that you’re covered if you do make a “mistake”? Which one can control a better Antichrist agenda? The worst is by far the Protestant Church, because the Church of Satan makes it too obvious that they are not of the good teachings of Christ, but the Protestant Church fools everyone saying they follow the good teachings of Christ, but really don’t; therefore, have many times more followers. Both achieve the same results (on major / important issues), but only the Protestant Church can take those who endeavor to be good, and make them bad. Plus, again, like how most everyone is, many Protestant ministers are so dumb they can’t see the contradictions of their statements. So, again, the ONLY solution can be taught by only “one”… which is me.
Spilling the beans:
Bush says he’s going to tell President-elect Obama all the little B.S. secrets that only the selected elite know. Well, if George can help the future world by revealing all this stuff, then it would help a lot in his Fair Afterlife Judgment. Even if Obama keeps these secrets secret, he’ll probably share them with a future administration, that shares it with a future administration, etc. until someone determines that we live in a “democracy” where the people will make the decisions after given all the facts. Not being given all the facts is mostly a “fair and balanced” problem, concerning international issues; and, is what caused 9/11, the Iraq war, etc. Mr. Critical could likely explain errors and/or evil in lots of this secret information; but, how can I if I don’t know exactly what they all are? Once I’m dead and gone, apparently no one will be able to correct this stuff until trial and error has passed on every issue – and that only starts after the secrets have become known. I’m totally aware everyone thinks they can think to my level, but I have given hundreds of examples why everyone can’t. The catch-22 is that since all have self-serving pride / evil, no one is able to admit I’m smarter. Sure, dissemination of my information would cause a flood of others telling what they think is smart, but when the dust settles, “one” (me) will be the only one remaining. You say I’m way too arrogant; but, I’ve never been ambitious for high wealth or popularity. After high school, all I wanted was “a” job and a girl friend. This religious endeavor is only my sacrificial duty to God, and its dissemination is just its needed goal. I get a kick out of it though. Being accurately correct is key. Repeating something I’ve been taught doesn’t hold water if it can be rationally refuted. It’s apparently impossible for ambitious college graduates to think to the non-wealth, non-friends level that I can.
I do feel sadness for Sarah Palin:
I mean, you can tell that she would have worked her tail off, unlike most Vice Presidents who you never hear much about.
California bans gay marriage:
I heard it’s because a child needs both a mother and a father. What, do most Californians like think gay couples are going to have a lot of children? Legal prostitution is also not going to happen. I’m against marriage and prostitution because the real Jesus was also against both (I know the media can’t comprehend the facts, and have to “trust” church authorities, so first-base on that issue is also not at hand). But, I support the Freedom to choose who you want to marry and/or hook with, because these problems (marriage and prostitution) need to dissolve on their own merits, via (1) truth about what Jesus really said, (2) once there’s a fad for diversity in looks, and (3) once women have competed for men so much that their sexual favors for money / conditions become so unprofitable that they convert to the actual pleasure of the sex act alone. Sounds “perverted” I know, but that’s because you’re dumb, proving you can only know what you’ve been taught from who gets paid the most to be trustworthy. There also needs to be no more STDs.
Barack Obama is a black guy:
Boy, I bet skinheads and true prejudice bigots are pissed. But, even if Obama ends up a jerk, the fact that he’s black is a great step in stopping discrimination. Again, many of those who are said to be the most gifted in intellect are really the dumbest when it comes to the many overall worldly advantages of Goldenrule practice. The wrong education is what makes blacks appear verbally dumber, and the wrong education (proud talk) is apparently what causes skinhead prejudice against others. I see, however, many attributes of blacks that are actually better than whites. So if we want to get rid of the inferior DNA, we would probably do the future better by getting rid of all the whites! Bias, skinhead discrimination, etc. is really what you get with just one-step emotional thinking.
If they don’t like a black man becoming President, they luckily have the Freedom to move to another country; like maybe Iran, that actually more fits with their Old Testament partiality and suppressive types of ideals. I mean, saying the right things (“Freedom” and “Fairness”) all the time when one really doesn’t hold those views has to be irritating to one’s inner soul. Go to Iran, then you can be more honest about what you’ve been taught away from the microphones.
I’m so diverse, I even have friends who are skinheads, but I don’t tell ‘em about my writings. Well, how else am I going to understand them if I don’t hang with them once in a while. “Patronize” is the key. I’ve even socialized with cops in the past. They either do have a stricter moral, but only know what they’ve been taught; or are the biggest troublemaking party animals I’ve ever met.
Well…:
Now that the election’s over, President Bush is free to invade Iran, because they still aren’t getting down on their knees for him. Other countries allow the perfectness of U.S. decisions to control their lives, so now’s the time to do what even the American people apparently don’t want. His popularity is in the dumpster, and he has faith alone, so what’s stopping him? I mean you’d better do what you want while you have the ability. “To thine own self be true.” Wouldn’t you be upset if you had to leave office but never had killed Saddam Hussein? Plus, invading Iran will force Barack Obama to have to do something about it. I can see it now: Bush‘ll start the war, then Obama will later warn them to stop their aggression or else. Then he’ll realize how necessary it is to have to kill civilians.
No, sorry, I’m not a moron:
I satirically make myself as an example of moronic thinking all the time. You see, from time to time, it just fits to sarcastically play the part to better insult others’ dumbness. But, now I may have to suppress certain mocking styles / Freedoms, thanks to the same kind of bias morons who try hard to remove context before and after said statements. I now know being paid high salaries to remove real / “fitting” context to incriminate is standard procedure in all bias cases, whether you don’t like a guy who “legally” got off for killing his wife, or because you don’t respect Freedom of Speech. And, are there any Americans who can think unbiasly? There is a very good reason why Jesus stressed for us to not judge others and forgive everyone, as He also knew that we are all a bunch of bias morons – so bad that we don’t even know it. I’m just taking the liberty of telling everyone that, where Jesus clearly told that people cannot bear total truth at that time. Otherwise, He would have lost His following, and I wouldn’t have His support to utilize (or unitize [def. 2 @ answers.com]) today. You see, I don’t seek a personal following. The Goldenrule in one word is to be the only following, because a following for me would avert that importance; and, this way allows me more options in finding truth.
The “Goldenrule” is a non-tangible Holy thing, since It was Jesus’ primary order. A “Spirit” is non-tangible also. The definite article “The” means “one” of a kind, opposed to “a” or “an” meaning one of many of the same kind. But “The Holy Spirit” (non-tangible) is something that is supposed to be good for the tangible world. Did Jesus order you to do The Holy Spirit or did He order you to do the Goldenrule, stating that The Holy Spirit will eventually come? So what then should you “do” or “think”? If everyone in the world did the “Goldenrule” would that “save” the world from its many, many problems? (I know, not if you’re wealthy, because the Goldenrule is what you think is wrong with the world.) With the “sharing the wealth” standards of the early Christians, they may have very well allegorically (meaning no overall stable definition) found The Holy Spirit; but, with a church today that can only exist by the money it receives, and with the one-third “Christian” world filled with many, many poor / needy people, The Holy Spirit can be very well lost. I (only), propose a system to solve the entire problem without taxing anyone, and without any charity from the churches! Try to figure that one out.
Mr. Critical – Mr. Obama, I don’t discriminate: I intend to find fault in everyone.
TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/