Subject:  Thinking outside one’s box:

10-23-07

Thinking outside one’s box:

Years ago I had to decide if I would remain within the “acceptable” bounds of the status-quo, by presenting just part of my case, leaving the remainder to be brought up at a later time; but, I decided to just give it all now – an ethical basis that no one in the future will ever be able to supersede.  Which requires one to have to step outside the box / status-quo.  Therefore, I understand that only people today with a very high I.Q. are going to be able to initially understand it, especially the part equating open sex with Jesus Christ.  As far as I know, I cannot be stereotyped:  Unless you can find me a Christian organization / denomination, who practices open / free bisexually (embedded with a desire for diversity in looks), who are all vegetarian, who believe that the Goldenrule is the only way to salvation, and (more importantly) that anything else is a cop-out, that afterlife retributive sin is only when (and every time) one hurts an innocent person, pay their employees commensurate to the difficulty of each one’s job, then I can say that my agenda is like no other.

Some folks you just can’t please:

(AP) The Atheist Pile asserted that I was “un-original,” then later puts me down for my very unusual (I think) Christian sexual findings; and ends still saying my stuff is not “new and creative” even after talking about memory data.  I think that’s a guy who just likes to be difficult, and just wants to disagree with everything I say, eh?  Or, maybe if I start watching something other than Fox News, I’ll notice everyone talking about Jesus’ commandment against marriage and for open sex; and, bringing people back to life via locating their memory data.  I guess I just need to get out more and find that none of my stuff is “new” or “creative.”   In such case, I’ll just say I have to agree with the entire standard motif.  I wish it was that easy.  Pile just has an inferiority complex and therefore has to constantly assert how he already has heard it all, and already knows it all – just like about everyone else thinks (but may not express it so dumbly).  I think the greatest imbecile in the world is the one who tells someone their stuff is wrong before they even read it.  Then, after reading some of it, still saying it’s all wrong, just to save face.  Pile isn’t the only one who thinks this way – he just got caught with his mouth open.  Maybe most people just know that their assumptions could be in error, and therefore are smart enough to just keep their mouths shut. – People other than O’Reilly and Hannity, who still know how to say all the standard dumb things from the 1950s.

I noticed Pile’s goldenrule.org domain listed on the market for sale, so he’s just another scumbag scalper / poacher holding out for money. – Very anti-Christian, very anti-Goldenrule, very pro-atheist.  “Dirt”: maybe we should all just go back to it.  “I” think we could do the world (atheist or Christian) a much greater service by putting garbage like Pile out of circulation (in jail), instead of jailing all those guys who have that strange / evil desire to have sex with (willing) 14-year-old girls.  But, money (even with antiquated beliefs) still determines who and who doesn’t go to jail.  I think inmates in our prisons are right when they complain about the ethical unfairness of all those other people out there who do even worse things and get away with it.  There’s NEVER going to be a solution other than a belief in Fair Afterlife Punishment, and a / my (only) “stable” (and pithy) definition of right and wrong.  God’s apparently in tune with it all, and can still show me how He can work in mysterious ways:

“I will follow The Goldenrule Name”:

Too bad that is so outside of today’s box.  Unlike the Pope, or a Church, the Goldenrule name, neither moths or rust can destroy, but apparently “thieves can break in and steal.”  Nothing but Fair Afterlife Punishment can stop it.  Making the Goldenrule name the next Pope would fulfill the prophecy of Malachy.

Just more of my “cherry-picking”:

Luke 12:33-34:

“Sell what you have and give alms; provide yourselves money bags which do not grow old, a treasure in the heavens that does not fail, where no thief approaches nor moth destroys. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”  The Goldenrule Name is paraphrased all over that New Testament.

So sorry, Mr. Critical, but we are going to cherry-pick from our higher authorities, like the Disciples, Paul, the Old Testament, etc.  I don’t think I’ll be missing any meals over it: I’m just the tangible secretary to what the moths and rust can’t destroy.

When Word’s grammar checker asks me to change Jesus’ words, is it God saying to not support Windows Vista, or is it just one of those things?

In 100 years, everyone will end up an atheist:

…if my stuff doesn’t get disseminated.  As long as the Church doesn’t tell what Jesus was really all about concerning sex, marriage and the family, everyone will want to move away from the Church.  And apparently, even with STDs – it’s just going to happen a bit slower.  And, of course, with no one believing in God, then why practice the Goldenrule?  So, Church leaders can either save face now, or save future generations.

True perfection cannot be easily accepted:

I realize I’m between a rock and a hard place concerning trying to get my intelligence disseminated.  The Church doesn’t want anything to do with it because of the very, very, very conflicting sex issue.  The atheists don’t want anything to do with it because it has to do with Christianity / religion.  When my stuff does get disseminated, then all the multitudes of dishonest prostitutes and pussywhipped johns can express their strong discontent, so I can enjoy telling them all “why” they think that way.  And, with today’s strong overwhelming fad for women being “independent,” they won’t tear me from limb to limb on the first day – I’ll actually have a week or two more to live.

Recently, I read a little about natural selection (mistakes makes it better):

Even in calmness / serenity / satisfaction, we humans all have a drive / desire to do and achieve better, to make thinks better all around.  This is the same part of God (or underlying intelligence / underlying judgment) that’s created all things.  Only when we get radically upset (overwhelming or conflicting with our personal wishes) is when we want to destroy the otherwise good things.  However, we do only learn via trial and error (otherwise, we’d have built the perfect car, airplane or computer the first time), or more simply said as just “error”; so there is credence to errors / mutations / chance causing improvements; but, there’s still that slight, timid underlying drive that identifies the error and drives to improve on it.  This underlying “intelligent” drive is what created matter in the first place, and everything good since.  But, there are flaws and mistakes we / God can’t correct (for the time being), which we humans now better see and drive to improve on.  Basically, even knowing we’ll be dead someday, do we still prefer that future generations have it better?  The answer is yes, because of our slight drive, or push, for overall improvement, which is part of God.  If there was no God, and we were all atheists, why would we all care?  Animals all have it too, but have reached their apex (from our perspective), where human’s high communication skills cause these improvements to flourish to a higher degree; where eventually, we will even reach our apex.  Then something improves from then on, etc. etc.  Our “image” being like God is God’s high praise of our ability to streamline “good” progress, which allows God to get what He wants much faster; yet still maybe slow from our perception.  Our “image” of being like God is our improved desires and drives (via the fate of competitive communication); which, conversely, God is like the “image” of our desires and drives.  Problems set in when the winners slight improvements, cause devastation to another.  Therefore, the Goldenrule is the only solution.  Any football teem plays much better working “with” each other, than the normal against each other / self-centered animal standard.

Adaptation by natural selection is what’s going on, but it’s driven by this underlying drive (God) who calls each step of the mistakes either good or bad, and drives toward the good.  So there is underlying Judgment, or we wouldn’t have reached the place we now are in the universe / time.  The universe would be one huge mess if there was no guidance of the errors.  Nor, would existence itself be stable.  “Survival” is just part of the cause of improvements: there’s still a drive for more.  Thinking in-between the extremes / stereotypes is what I excel in.  There is where agreeable answers can be found (for future non-conservatives).

Even the Biblical assumption that God just made these things instantly; say in one second, there can still be a sequence involved.  Even the refresh on your computer screen seems instant, but is all accomplished in a very fast sequence.  Therefore, the Creationist theory that God make these things instantly lacking sequence is irrational.  But, it’s not so much Genesis that disagrees with the evolution theory, but the miracles, that Jesus said had to be done (via hallucinations) or no one would believe and follow.  “Miracles” is really a sixth major issue of mine, which is in need of explanation, but I’m trying to stay away from it for the time being.  Read my 1-27-98 paper initially for what I’ve said so far.  Miracles defy the reality of sequence (even though sequence had to be used by God to produce the hallucinations).  Miracles cause many problems in religion, from thinking God can instantly serve you, to justification for the lies and corruption of the rich, who believe that God has served them, supporting / overlooking their lies and corruption.  Miracles are what cause the assumption that God made the described sequence of creation (the universe) instantly without sequence.  Some day, some genius will have to rationally explain the written miracle while maintaining a belief in God.  “Time” alone is something like God: we all know it’s there but we can’t really describe exactly what’s making it work or what made it, or what started it, but then nothing could have started it – where was it before that?  See?  Our minds see it with no limits, yet we can only communicate it in having limits.  Same with God, an intelligent person knows something’s there, but even God can’t explain it.  But God can explain His drive for improvement as far as we are concerned, and that, in a nutshell, is the Goldenrule, which we can understand; but, will have to continue to be learned from our “mistakes” before it can be fully accomplished.  We say there’s an alpha and omega, but how could this “limit” exist?  Most theorize that matter has emanated outward from a point, yet the theory that matter has divided staying inside a point has equal stability.  Regardless, the error, drive or push, has to be called “good” from some perspective (God) or it wouldn’t exist at all.  When I think about it, I can sort of feel the overall universal drive or push, can you?  I think you have to first have understanding of it before you can feel it.  It’s easy for me to “see” gravity, because I understand how it works.  Gravity is logically and simply subatomic particles driving / pushing into and through the earth, pressing the larger particles / matter / atoms inwards, passing straight through, but with a slight pressure, being beaten to a smaller size, smaller strength; which regains size / momentum as it passes farther out into space straight out the other side of the object / planet it just accelerated through, just to recycle back through again, once it has regained it’s original size / power.  I would guess it’s passing through us at about a thousand miles per hour.  So, don’t slip and fall.

I don’t think our administration understands how Iran thinks:

When WE (and Israel) are the ones who are unfair and unjust, then people on the other side are willing to die to substantiate their cause.  Toby and Willie would do the same thing.  We have done a tremendous amount of more damage against Muslims than 9/11 did against us; and, mostly via the highest possible degree of lying to ourselves.  We are the true and worst evil in this world, and just because we are all too stupid to know that, doesn’t mean Iran is oblivious to our threats, and know they “need” to develop WMDs “just” for self protection.  They know that we (or Israel) will just continue to bully them until we take them over.  Now sanctions and threats might work against a leader who is just evil and unfair (like we are).  But, when we, an evil and unfair country, try to police others who are evil and unfair, it is kind of pathetic?  I mean, all we’re going to do is demand sexual abstinence and create more STDs, so now is definitely not the right time for a one world order.  But, with minds like Pile’s running the country (who think they already know it all), it’s impossible to make them think otherwise; because, when they discover they were in error, saving face is ALL they care about.  George W. Bush would certainly pull out of Iraq if he knew that “he” was going to be the next one to die for it; but, has no problem sending others to their ignorant death.  What makes me sick, is all the young dumb minds who still go to Iraq.  It’s really pathetic.  Fox News is the biggest killer of our boys in Iraq.  I’ll watch movies of past wars (e.g., Elizabeth), and we can wonder what made those young people think they needed to kill each other; but, the same ignorant mindset is still alive and active today.

Many conservatives might even like the fact that Fox News gives only slanted information.  But, it’s because of this kind of telling the American people mainly what they want to hear, that has caused the Iraq debacle, and 9/11.  It’s our news leaders who caused 9/11!  Someone PLEASE explain to me how I’m wrong!  Even Rudy Giuliani, a candidate for President, is even expressly in the dark about this.  Giuliani is so dumb that he actually believes that our past killings and bombing have nothing to do with why the terrorists attacked New York City.  How are we ever going to find a solution when these kinds of minds are the best candidates we have for President???  Hillary and Obama both seem to be living in the same cloud: they’re both “smart” enough to know to tell the American people what they want to hear.  Then when they hear the cheers, they’ll start to believe it too.  “Dumb”: it’s all you’re going to have after I’m dead and gone.

Contrary to the genius of our Vice President, I think the more we threaten Iran, the more programs they’re going to implement that we don’t like.  Not the other way around.

Don’t you say it: let me say it:

As I said in my last letter: “Don’t mess up your reputation, let me mess up mine.”  Good example: Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif. found himself apologizing for his earlier speech against Bush and the troops.  He didn’t even say it right in the first place.  Republicans actually have a more stable thesis simply because it’s old and traditional.  Democrats and liberals, who are trying to find a better way, are going to keep goofing up.  Mine is the ONLY stable change.  I’m sorry I’m just a nobody, though.  If you want to see effective change, you are going to have to disseminate my website.  Trick ‘em: disseminate my website just to show how ludicrous some people can be, then let it mature on its own essence.  O’Reilly’s guest says Christians are going to start demonstrating against atheism (without me).  That’ll be entertaining.  Watching the atheists win.

I think O’Reilly just wants to be The Boss:

O’Reilly calls Bruce Springsteen a “pinhead” for not coming on his program.  I guess that’s the worst thing Bill can find against Bruce.  O’Reilly, invite me on your program to debate... or you’re a pinhead! (according to your own criteria).

Some friendly Italian advice:

O’Reilly, just do what The Boss says, and don’t ask any questions!  Got it?

Cruelty to animals is on its way out, eventually, even without my guidance:

I get a good feeling when we do something nice and beneficial for our animals, especially when the animal doesn’t realize it.  Ted Nugent, a want-to-be Republican, gets a good feeling when he shoots an animal.  Which kind of mind will evolution eventually destroy: (1) Where survival and mistakes will eventually overrule, or (2) where a slight underlying intelligence will eventually overrule?  I think most of us will really simply like it more, when we do something that makes an animal happy. – And, it’s a good feeling knowing that the animal doesn’t know we did it.

Arson suspected in S. California fires:

My guess is the arsonist(s) were “atheists” or cop-out Christians.  What do you think?  What do you think would be a fix?  Well, then everyone should make sure they do their part to make sure my stuff doesn’t gets disseminated.  That way we can make sure we have arson fires throughout the future.  Smart!  You can even have Geraldo accurately report on it.  Then when he expresses his personal comments, that will be the solution.  Smart!

Now, does everyone like me better now that I’m calling everyone “smart!”?

Mr. Critical – It’s hard reachin’ that Gold in rock and that Goldenrule:

TO SEE PRIOR WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/