Subject: “Dumb”:
Sorry, but to be most correct, calling you all “dumb” is the best precise base explanation for all our avoidable problems. You see, the very unique thing about me is that I pursue getting it right more than making friends.
10-21-08
I’m also aware that this is a catch-22, as truly “dumb” people are too dumb to realize they’re dumb. But I write anyway, just to impress people far in the future, if no one else. Once they see I was right on some of my issues (over past vast majority thought), likely they’ll heed my other issues already written. Sure, you Country and Western listeners can kick my ass, but that can only slow progress. I have seen some results of my teachings from individual readers today, as they will change some things seeing the logic in my commentary, but will eventually retract as their friends will still oppose logic, simply because the friends aren’t aware of my better ways. They think that their pride in not letting a “nobody” like me influence them, is their priority in keeping their friends. And they are correct with the limited exposure I have. Therefore, fully disseminating my commentary is the only solution. The key would be to somehow get my stuff disseminated without anyone having to “chance” supporting it. So, another catch-22. Basically, I’m like a dead person who happens to still be alive. All of you care much more about your self-centered interest while you’re alive, placing Afterlife praises way down secondarily. The only religious people today are the ones who like all the self-serving cop-outs, placing them all for this life, instead of their Afterlife. Oh yeah, the Goldenrule teachings exist in religions, but again, they’re “way down secondarily” and that achieves about the same as if it didn’t exist at all. The Goldenrule in religions today is only used for argument to substantial ethics; again, to later redirect for cop-out purposes / money. (Boy, I know how to say it right.)
Preachers don’t teach correct or full Goldenrule ethics without cop-outs simply because no church goer is going to pay money to a church for teaching them something they already know: If someone wants to be good to others, they don’t need to go to church to learn it, they can “just” start being good on their own. You see, Jesus would rather the results of His teachings get “accomplished” more than anyone knowing His name. His name is only helpful in a very valuable support for me. I know that sounds egotistical, but I didn’t plan and pursue this endeavor, I feel a force pressuring me to pursue this endeavor as priority. I could make lots more money having just a minimum wage job, and be able to pay for much more women, than taking the time necessary for all this research and commentary. Duh! So if Fox News thinks I’m going to change my (more correct) thesis for the sake of possible fortune and fame, forget it. That’s like when Jesus was tempted by the Devil.
When I become homeless and hungry, then I’ll kiss up to someone’s standard, like everyone else does, since God’s free food isn’t available any more.
Country music listeners:
…who totally support the Republican champagne appetites with their beer incomes. Who will gladly run at a machine gun for same. They are totally unable to think outside the box. These people are great examples of why America desperately needs a smart and honest leader. The “one” who insults them the most is really their best friend.
Step one / first base:
Try to repeat this: “I’m not aware of too many things. I know what I know, if you know what I mean.” –Edie Brickell, 1988. The world needs more awareness and honesty like this.
And:
If I was limited in what I could say and think, like you all are, because you have to fit in with some existing stereotype for a job or for friends, then I wouldn’t have as open of a mind to ponder further / better. There’s still a high degree of dwindling conservative stereotypes out there that are in large need for correction, and there are a number of stereotypes who just want to be different, who may cite a few betterments, but none have the stability of my thesis. So tell me if there are any others who have the ability to be as open minded as me, who still have friends? You can’t, because if there is, you don’t like them, and therefore will not share their information. But, with all of you trying to reach Home starting at Second or Third base, I’m starting at First base, where I don’t find 100% support from anyone. That’s not the way I planned it, that’s just the way it is. I strive accuracy first, friends second.
I don’t worry: I can make you all like me again whenever I want:
Rich people really do need to read the Bible more:
Jesus tells the needy in the Beatitudes / Matthew 5:3-12 that theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven, etc., and doesn’t mention the fate of the needy of Matthew 25:34-46, therefore the “everlasting punishment” in Matthew 25:34-46 apparently just applies to certain kinds of rich people. However, Matthew 5:23-26 still applies to the poor, anytime they hurt an innocent person.
And there’s two ways a rich person can interpret the parable of The Talents: Matthew 25:14-30. If you interpret this that the “lord” spoken here is typical evil selfishness, stating that that’s just the Ungodly status-quo, you are correct; but, if you interpret it as guidance to follow for your life, then you’re in trouble, and better “change.”
I’z the smartest thinker:
For example: I’z-a thinkin’ that that big light in the sky, that shines up my yard half the time each day, doesn’t just die in the West every evening and becomes reborn in the East every mornin’. I used to think its light went out when it got drenched in the Pacific Ocean, but now I have reckoned out that it maybe stays lit all the time, and somehow circles underneath the ground, then “reappears” every time it reaches the other side of the slab. Try to top that one!
There’s a state-of-the-art museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas made by rich, honest Christians, that “proves” how all things – rock formations, fossilization, canyons, mountains, etc. – on this planet have formed within the last 6,000 years, but I think I’ve even topped that superior reckoning.
What’s the difference between “puppy love” and “real love”?:
“Puppy love” is the kind of love that parents tell their adolescent daughters isn’t “real love”; and, that “real love” is the kind of love they will experience when they get older. The actual difference is that the later “real love” is something that is dependent on “wise” decisions especially in determining if the boy has or will have enough money to support a wife, and by how much; where “puppy love” is just liking a boy for himself regardless of money. Since the scheme has to do with “dishonest prostitution,” parents aren’t allowed to mention that this is the real difference early on; and, instead tell their daughter(s) that they “will understand when they get older.” By then, they will have likely acquired enough knowledge from peer friends to know the more important additional thing to look for in a boy: financial ability. Or, when they’re older, if the parents notice that their daughter is still dating a worthless bum, they will spell-out the financial reality. Boys, too, will eventually “learn” that they are not to “just” want a girl like an animal, but that they are to be financially advantageous to the girl of their choice.
“Puppy love” is, however, still a form of “lust” that Jesus demands we must eliminate because it is way too much “strong” and “intense” desire and concern for just one; thereby lessening desire and concern for all others. Today, the “dishonest prostitution” (sex for money/conditions) factor is favored as more evil in the eyes of an honest person (which there are very few), where everyone is totally oblivious to the ills of just wanting one person, even when it’s not associated with financial gain.
“Lust” rules even in “dishonest prostitution”:
“I love you so much that I can’t leave you, even though my mind tells me I should.” –Ray Price, 1961.
People who squeeze your hand real hard when shaking hands:
Does someone teach them to do it, or are they all just inconsiderate A-holes on their own?
People who talk real fast when giving you their number, but talk normal the rest of the time:
Does someone teach them to do it, or are they all just inconsiderate A-holes on their own?
Making money and friends versus fairness:
If Barack Obama becomes President, he needs to mention the word “Amiriyah” every time he mentions “9/11.” Otherwise, he isn’t going to like my kind of criticism. I already know John McCain wouldn’t do it. An equal / fair mention of this word would also prevent future problems for the U.S. in foreign relations, as the American public would not be able to escape the realization of what they are all so oblivious about. All I can say to the innocent victims of the Amiriyah shelter, who may be listening, that “Amiriyah” fairness will be equally mentioned as the reason in practically all American politician’s and news people’s Fair Afterlife Sufferings. And they will even be sufferings for all the American soldiers killed and hurt because of their silence.
Is God on our side?:
Concerning U.S. war, Sarah Palin says rather than asking if God is on our side, we should ask “if we are on God's side.” It’s easy to get the answer: God doesn’t need to repeat anything. Just ask if it abides in the Goldenrule. E.g., for war specifically, if we are not going to hurt any innocent people, and plan to only kill “guilty” people, then it’s a good deed. And, of course, they’re “guilty” only if they plan to hurt any innocent people. If we “have to” kill innocent people to stop someone else from killing innocent people, then that shows the selfish game lie. It’s really apparent when the media doesn’t report our killing of innocent civilians, but does report every attack on American ground. What that’s saying is, to “carry on” right or wrong. In war, I suggest only targeting the evil leader only. Like an assassination via one of our honorable undercover spies. But they’re all probably booked up watching me. Pretty much whoever decides to hang around with the evil leader, or defend him, isn’t too innocent if he or her knows of the evil leader’s plan to hurt any innocent person. Of course it’s very questionable who is innocent in Israel, since they’re the latest invaders. So Ahmadinejad, for example, isn’t necessarily “guilty” and worthy of death, on how most people in this country judge. Plus, since we still kill innocent people, we are not worthy to kill a truly “guilty” leader anyway; because our assassination mission could not be seen with merit.
Let’s just all admit war is just a game of seeing who can get away with the most unfairness.
Guinea pigs:
Not to mention cruelty to animals; but, I understand the U.S. still uses mental patients, etc. to test new drugs, which will regularly harm them either temporality or permanently. Well, the Goldenrule has to say “no” to this one. Sorry, but it makes sense that when the truth comes down the pike in the Afterlife, there will be just reasons why those patients will have something legitimate against you – including any media who knows about it and doesn’t report it. Bad things will be done against many souls according to Matthew 5:25-26. If testing a new drug is so important, then you will find it just (righteous) to just (only) test the drug on yourself. The fact that you won’t just “proves” my point. Don’t you hate logic? Plus, if you did the test on yourself, you’d be able to better report the results. Don’t you hate logic?
Many would tell me that Matthew 5:21-26 is just “one” part of the Bible, and that there are many other connotations by earlier prophets, Paul and apostles allowing another choice for people to follow.
Mr. Critical thinks that everyone who goes to church is really just an atheist who wants to do whatever they can get away with, and that people just go to church for the cop-outs “just in case” there’s a God. Am I right? In other words, people really don’t want anything to do with God, unless God is going to give them what they want. Right? Again, this is more subconscious facts rather than what gets said and thought by y’all on the surface.
There are lots of terminally ill people who would “allow” helpful drugs to be tested on their bodies, for “good deed” reasons in worry of their soul (to better their soul). If the drug causes a harmful effect, they’re not out much. But they’ve helped their soul.
In today’s society, a woman has to be dishonest to be a “good girl”:
“Nice” women aren’t allowed to admit they want a man because he’s more attractive. “Nice” women aren’t allowed to admit that they make sure a man has either financially or in burden “earned” their sexual favors. A “good” Pope is one who doesn’t admit that this is a form of prostitution. Or, a “good” Pope is one who is not smart enough to realize that marriage is just a form of prostitution. Don’t you hate logic?
I’m going to be dead someday:
It’s now that you need to present your arguments against my thesis. I can’t always second-guess the errors in your mind that justifies your continued oppositions. I know how arrogant that sounds, but I am constantly being reminded how I am able to reckon farther.
“Secret society”:
I keep hearing more and more about some kind of secret society that’s supposed to be the world’s top elites, bankers, etc., who are supposed to be who’s really in control of the U.S. government and major media. Well, first of all, (if they exist at all) they must not be too secret if everyone seems to know about them and their history. Second, since they’re “secret” that just shows they’re up to no good. I say anything the public wouldn’t go along with (with education) can’t be righteous. I’ve heard everything from them being the ones behind 9/11 where George W. was their puppet, to they’re planning to soon murder billions of people to reduce world population to a limit of 500 million. Sounds too far fetched to me. I doubt they’d find much support for that much evil, but they probably are up to something. But, those kinds of accusations could just be disinformation tactics to somehow better hide what they’re really up to, by obliterating the integrity of those who talk against it and therefore any others who might really know something about it, or to demoralize even other pertinent groups. Possibly they have a moral goal – correcting things that don’t get corrected by the standard laws, where mainly they’re an intelligence organization aimed against crime. And possibly they just want whatever’s good for them personally. Regardless, surely they wouldn’t want someone like me to know all about them, not just because I’d blab it all over the Web (which is something else I understand they plan to soon suppress), but because I’d blab it in such a way they would show how dumb they really likely are. If they had any good points, then I’d make rational sense out of them where they wouldn’t need to be that much secret anymore. If they have or plan to hurt any innocent people, they simply need to pray hard to God that there is no such a thing as God. Contrarily, I bet they all have their souls “saved” by “faith alone,” don’t they? Or they have one of those advanced atheist intellects where they are too smart to believe that anything has created the universe for a “reason,” and could be helping it along but within “limitations.” If they mess with me, then they are messing with God’s word in a way that would likely cause them trillions of years of Fair Afterlife Suffering to equal all the pain and suffering of all future populations. And I’m just one person. If they are there to support “morals” like the family standard, etc., then they definitely need to be on my mailing list. But, how can they be when they’re “secret”?
Are YOU smart enough to know what’s really going on?:
I guess it’s pretty apparent that John McCain picked Sarah Palin just because she is a woman, just to target the bias female vote. I mean, Hillary was a rather experienced candidate, who just happened to be a woman. So the theme for a female for President became part of the game. If John McCain really cared about more qualified candidates rather than to just “win” he’d have picked someone like Romney, Giuliani, etc.
Government surveillance people:
They just can’t take criticism very well. The main problem could be if one of those imbeciles and I get into an altercation for some reason; because, it won’t matter how innocent I was and how guilty they were, I’d be the “guilty” one regardless. So, why should I want them following me around at all? How is it to “my” advantage? Especially when I know they’re doing it? How many other Americans are having their Freedom of Speech indirectly suppressed? And those are the ones who talk the most about protecting my Freedom to justify their wars. Plus, who know what kinds of other problems they’ve caused me that I don’t know about. Someday I’m going to have to get to the bottom of it, with or without a lawyer.
Sexual “pervert”:
Is apparently a person who is “honest” about the fact that marriage is sex for money / conditions; manifested by the church’s instruction of abstinence until marriage. In other words, you’re not a “pervert” if you’re either dishonest or dumb.
Sarah Palin’s emails hacked:
Everyone should be glad to know that the government doesn’t investigate individual cases of computer hacking (according to Judge Andrew Napolitano), unless it’s against “somebody.” That’s because they are too busy spying on people like me – again who just exercise Freedom of Speech, but just not to their liking. Lots of people think it’s awful someone reading Sarah Palin’s personal emails, and I agree; but, I’m sure everyone would think it’s okay that someone reads all my personal emails – again, just because I speak beyond their aptitude. In other words, I get harassed and have to know that everything I say is being listened to “just” because everyone is “dumb” – no other reason! For example, there’s “logic” why we shouldn’t bother to pursue Osama bin Laden. It’s because our own leaders are just as evil: kill innocent people for all the same reasons; therefore, deserve capture equally. But, we live in a world far too bias and dumb to even closely realize it. You see, in getting bin Laden, our message to never kill an innocent person would not get “understood.” So, I can see Barack Obama killing more innocent people to get bin Laden, but I can’t see him putting both Bush 41 and Bush 43 into prison. Clinton deserves the same.
Therefore, when I speak about the ONLY solution to war and violence, and make “fair” comparisons, then “I’m” going to be considered a threat to national security. ONLY a dumb and bias person cannot be a threat against national security.
Bush killing innocent Iraqis is like in 1983, if Ronald Reagan planned to kill innocent Soviets, and the Soviets instead invaded the U.S. killing you, would you say the Soviets were justified because Ronald Reagan deserved removal from office? Of course I’m dealing with a mentality that can’t even consider that the U.S. could be wrong or unfair in its international dealing. So I am talking way above all your heads.
You see, this is all extremely advanced “fair” thinking, that you all are far too dumb to understand, so “I” have to “sacrifice” to do all of you a HUGE favor by “educating” you about something you’ll never figure out on your own. Back in 2001 “I” suggested we get bin Laden “dead or alive” just to send the message to never kill “innocent” people; but, I also said it’s not worth pursuing him if we have to kill “one” innocent person to find him. And, that was during a period where George W. hadn’t killed any innocent people yet (at least none that I knew about). There’s NEVER going to be solutions to these kinds of wars and conflicts until schools, colleges, and military colleges teach what “I” present. Yet, I’m the one who has to be burdened by all the surveillance idiots. “I’m” the one who has to bear all their added entrapment tricks, which luckily none have worked. “I’m” the one who gets biasly analyzed by a psychiatrist every time I get frustrated about something. “I’m” the one who has to live under constant threat and idiocy. But, because of all this, in my Afterlife, I know my rewards will even be greater as I do have to suffer through it all now.
Really, I should advice you all to just realize that you’re all too stupid to figure out right from wrong on your own, and to “just” do what I say. Tell me the error of that advice?
Oh, I’d better not forget to add: I’m never going to do anything illegal or violent against all the deserving people in the country just because I am “helping” you all “realize” the idiocy that you all are! Should I repeat that ten more times? “REALIZE” (authorities) that “I” don’t fit in with ANY stereotype that you have ever known before! Just because you are too stupid to understand that I’m just good-deed sharing truthful rational logic to lessen world problems, doesn’t mean you have “probable cause”!
“To shake things up”:
That’s why Sarah Palin wants to go to Washington. Again, ONLY “I” have the way to “shake things up.” Her saying it as a Republican just shows that the people must really, really want things to change.
Todd Palin:
Fox News is talking to him a lot. They probably just want to see if he possibly has what it takes to run the county if Sarah becomes President.
Hey Warren Jeffs:
http://blog.laborlawtalk.com/2006/10/18/alaska-statutory-rape-laws/, Alaska Statutory Rape Laws:
Alaska statutory rape laws declare that anyone who is 18 years old or older who has sex with a person who is 16 or 17, or who is at least three years younger than the offender, can be charged with sexual abuse in the third degree. This is also a felony.
I now understand that Sarah Palin’s 17-year-old daughter got statutorily “raped” by her 18-year-old boyfriend. But nothing bad is going to happen to him. But, you get to spend the rest of your life in prison for the same kind of violation, and you weren’t even the one who got to sleep with the girl. And Palin’s daughter wasn’t even “married,” as your girl was. I just love knowing so much more than everyone else about the word “fair.”
http://www.kslegislature.org/legsrv-statutes/getStatute.do?number=11738, Kansas Statues, “21-3512. Prostitution”:
Prostitution is performing for hire, or offering or agreeing to perform for hire where there is an exchange of value …
You mean if a couple is “honest” and she agrees that if he buys her dinner and takes her to a movie, he will get sex, then that is “a class B nonperson misdemeanor”? But, if she’s “dishonest” and doesn’t say that’s what the deal is, it’s not a crime? Well, aren’t you all glad you’re all dishonest? The law requires it! I, also, will have to make certain I don’t offer this deal with a date, by being honest and open. No layin’ the cards on the table with me, sir. I’m going to be a good all-American boy. That’s right! And, if someone marries someone with this offering and agreement, then that makes the prostitution also “church” sanctioned / valued. So, you’d better lie to your priest during confession. Don’t you hate logic? The church has to.
How precious is “Freedom”?:
“Maybe I’ll settle down, get married or stay single and stay free.” –Kenny Chesney, 2005.
“And they call me Warrior!”:
“So don’t tell me who’s wrong and right when liberty starts slipping away. And if you ain’t gonna fight, get out of the way.” –Kid Rock. So he like tells people to not express “liberty” in free speech, so he can kill people for it. The only reason “liberty” could slip away is because of people who tell people like me they don’t want to hear it. Those are the ones who need to find another country. Because if you don’t like hearing it, they you should get out. “And they call me warrior! And they call me loyalty! And they call me ready to provide relief and help, I’m wherever you need me to be (right or wrong – because he admits he don’t want to hear it).” And they call him “brainwashed”!
Sorry, but advanced human intelligence tells that whoever would kill a ltttle kid in war are the biggest cowards and criminals in the entire country. NOT the other way around. Whoever would kill a little kid for even their own personal liberty doesn’t deserve liberty. They are the true kinds who deserve to be slaves and also to have their brick-making ordered doubled. And they’re going to get it in their Afterlife. I wouldn’t kill or support the killing of a little kid for my personal freedom or my entire life. So, that makes me a lot better than those who do, and much more worthy for this world and the best in the Afterlife. The fact that “I” can do it means that they can do it, but refuse to for selfish reasons. I’m not going to get anything for it in today’s world because there are so many evil people today. However, having the U.S. military admitting they don’t care about right and wrong in a song by a celebrity, is first step to ending this kind of major ignorance and cowardice. So, keep playing the song in theaters and everywhere. The public “needs” that education. It’s like when I tell Fred Phelps to “keep up the good work” by making himself into the biggest moron in the country, as his kind of disrespectful behavior toward innocent people just causes people have more respect for homosexuals. So, “Keep up the good work U.S. military!” for admitting that you don’t care about what’s right and what’s wrong. I can use this song to show a future righteous generation how truly evil the U.S. military was of this era. Other countries today should see the same thing from these lyrics. And that our military is so dumb that they actually believe they’re doing the right thing in they eyes of God. The video shows our military doing good deeds to kids, but they don’t give equal time (fair and balanced) showing the effects of one of our bombs burning kids to death. So I am so right in my thesis; and that my thesis is so much the answer to these problems.
Plus, we haven’t fought a war for our “liberty” for many, many years. This “liberty slipping away” is another HUGE lie and brainwash. Wars today are 100% games. Like this Russian thing: South Ossetia is just another place where people want their “liberty.” In this case, the “game” says we are against it. South Ossetia’s wanting liberty is no different than the U.S. wanting liberty from England. Mexico’s liberty from Spain. Texas wants liberty from the United States. Etc. It’s all a game. To the vast majority, it doesn’t matter what seal the cop is working under when you need to report a crime. If you study “taxation without representation” before the Revolutionary War, you’ll even find that that was a HUGE lie, in that the tax was to pay England back for earlier representation / services. We Americans just don’t like paying our “bills.” And we are HUGE liars simply because “faith alone” is our principal religion. The vast majority of Americans wouldn’t have seen any difference in their lives if England had stayed in charge of the colonies. The only reason Russia would start a war with the United States is for self defense reasons only (same in Cold War era). The main reason we would start a war with Russia is for the joy in having control and power.
John McCain’s threat of starting a war with Russia is just like Iran’s threat of attacking Israel. Probably both made for the same purpose. Both create fear in the intended, to either give in to said demands, or to make the first strike in defense. Like, I hear Hannity very much justifying a U.S. invasion of Iran based on their threat against Israel, but I don’t hear him justifying Russia to strike the U.S. for John McCain’s threat against Russia. Again, it’s ALL a bias, selfish, evil, and very, very dumb “game.” And you all think I shouldn’t talk about it. Would you all like it better if I just gave the finger, yelled out cuss works, instead of making rational points? You’ve all proved that you’re not smart enough to figure this out on your own, or we wouldn’t have had most all the wars in the past. And you-all’s continued bias reporting is what will be the cause of the next major war, or the complete destruction of the humankind.
Hey, I just heard:
Russia is sending battleships to the Caribbean. Well, they acted quickly. Sounds like WWIII is just the slightest mistake away. Don’t think I’m smart, keep thinking you and John McCain are smart. Well, I don’t see anyone asking me to proofread candidate’s speeches, so to remove all the dumb stuff.
Honesty and “honesty”:
Liberals say let’s take from the rich to give to the poor. Conservatives say let’s give to the rich and that is what will help the poor. Either way, it’s apparent that American’s goal is to help the poor.
“Sagacious”:
When righting oreilly@foxnews.com, O’Reilly actually asks everyone to be “sagacious”: “Having or showing keen discernment, sound judgment, and farsightedness.” But, I still don’t thing he likes what I write. Well Bill, you “asked” for it. Unless “sagacious” really means: Having or showing keen limitations to an existing stereotype that keeps your job and/or friends.
It’s: “Never hurt an innocent person”:
Otherwise, it’s just whatever you can get away with. This explains why there’s so many games and favoritism in courts, politics and war. If “never hurt an innocent person” was the standard, then the stability would exist to better fight crime, discrimination, and the bending of the rules and games authorities play.
Sarah says she gets “clobbered” on lots of her answers:
It’s Mr. Critical’s job to not get clobbered on any of my answers.
They say John McCain can get pretty angry:
Well that’s great to know he’ll be making decisions on war based on his animalistic selfishness of anger instead of rationalness, fairness and truth.
Shoe on the other foot:
Concerning the October 3rd O.J. Simpson conviction: It’s like if I robbed a liquor store, that’d be wrong. But, if that liquor store owner had once robbed me, then it’d be something totally different. Especially if I had called the police and they had done nothing to the liquor store owner about it. Especially if my robbing the liquor store was just falling for a voice recorded set up. Especially if the police were part of the entrapment.
Like what Ron Goldman did, if I threatened giving a police officer a severe beating with my karate expertise, and ended up with a knife in me (or he tasered me too many times), he might lose his job, but he wouldn’t be convicted for murder. Or, if I was a disgruntled Iraqi who had just lost my entire family by an American bomb, and I threatened to beat up an American soldier in Iraq, I’d be quickly shot as a terrorist with no trial against the soldier. U.S. soldiers can’t even get convicted even when the civilians don’t make themselves into a threat. Now, I’m not saying O.J. was in the right, but he was in the right if you put the shoe on the other foot.
I understand, and it’s apparently obvious, that O.J. Simpson still “loved” Nicole. So who’s the real murderer of Nicole and Ron? It’s overwhelmingly the church, with their adamant love only one for marriage standard, overruling “Jesus” in Matthew 19:10-12 and Paul in 1 Corinthians 7:6. And those will be the ones who will suffer equally in Fair Afterlife Punishment for those and many other deaths / problems. That is if Fair Afterlife Punishment has at least the same intelligence as little ol’ me. The Pope, all the cardinals, all the priests, most of the pastors, etc. will even all die unrepented. Since they are the voices of the church, they don’t repent unless they verbally repent to the multitudes. So, we can all laugh at the possibility of that happening, right?
I don’t think O.J. should have gotten off his murder charges either; but, any juror or judge who would convict someone in impertinent retrospect is an insult, corruption and firm detriment to our entire justice system and society’s overall wellness of life. Doing so is actually worse as a whole than the murders themselves. It’s just saying that Adolf Hitler should have won the war. I mean if you allow / support it once, then you’re allowing it 99% of the time for every justice leader where it’s just a game to “win” against someone who likely just speaks their mind. To be pithy, letting criminals know that it’s okay for the system people to bend the rules, but it’s not okay for the criminal, is the worst way to stop crime. Because, in fairness, it means there are no real rules.
Impulsive minds like O.J.’s can kill a couple of people, but premeditated minds like Hannity’s and O’Reilly’s can kill hundreds of thousands in Iraq, and even – what is it now – four or five thousand Americans? That’s a tremendously higher evil, and even more so when the general public is so oblivious to it.
Again, even convicting real evil minds via breaking court rules, just tells the other real evil minds that there is no true right and wrong, or fairness, and that it is just whatever one can get away with.
Movies like Righteous Kill staring Robert De Niro and Al Pacino, where the cops frame and murder known criminals who beat the system. Same thing: it just lets the serial rapers, etc. feel more justified in doing it! They shouldn’t even be showing that that kind of possibility exists, intending to deter crime by the conveyance of corrupt police. Believe me, it’s just going to make things worse! Plus, I very much doubt if any real criminal “beats the system” when a judge doesn’t want him to. Unless it’s being covered too much by the media. (I’m not saying the media should cover trials less.)
What it comes down to is if we’re going to have rules, then we must abide by the rules; but, if we’re going to be like an emotional animal and have every police officer give excessive punishment at the time of capture, then we might as well just go back to being animals where every man’s for himself. Sure, going by the rules is going to fail sometimes and let some real evil people go, but probably a lot less than those who are being convicted and jailed on frivolous charges just because they have a big mouth. Again, overall, crime is NEVER going to end as long as there’s no fear of Fair Afterlife Judgment. So, again, the real / far worse criminals are those who run our churches. Those are the ones who will be accounted for many, many crimes.
Okay, let’s get even more realistic: I believe the correct bias order is: Police first, women second, rich people third, and other men last (and guys who practice their Freedom of Speech below that). I don’t really know how things are in other countries, but this is definitely the way things are in this country. Actually there could be a swap between ugly women and rich people, changing the order to police, attractive women, rich people, ugly women, other men, me. All the more reason I need to watch my p’s and q’s. If I didn’t talk, I wouldn’t have to worry about being watched, harassed, and entraped. Everywhere I go in this wonder Freedom of Speech country the local police intend to prove that they have the smarts to be the ones who gets me. It’s like starting over in every different state I enter.
Locating God:
If scientists ever get to the point where they “find God” what they’ll find is a very “dumb” and very slight “drive” but particularly a kind of knowledge that knows everything: that knows what and where every particle is in the entire universe, but nothing more. Before they reach that point, they’ll likely see that those various formations of particles are “rationalizing further” via the same original “drive” for something better or different. This “rationalized furthering” would not be possible without all the tangible particles. These “rationalized furtherings” are therefore “created by God,” but again, only based on the existing data. It’s like our minds: All we know since birth is only what our five senses pick up during our entire life. Our brain functionally “rationalizes further” that data. Without our senses, we wouldn’t have anything to “rationalize further.” Via the long / evolutionary slight improvement process (via underlying rationalizing “intelligence”) involved in making humans, the advantages of God finally creating “Himself” or “what He desires for progress” is that humans can “rationalize further” much faster than God’s can achieve compared to His otherwise slight underlying ability to move subatomic data / substance / numbers. Again, “rationalizing further” can only be accomplished via the slight “drive” in every particle and formation in the universe. It’s like the drive in numbers “rationalized further” and created the many same-sized gravitons. Then the gravitons “rationalized further” conflicting diversity, by creating larger radius particles to fill the gravitons / universe with galaxies, stars, solar systems, and planets. Then our planet’s rocks and rain “rationalized further” making the intelligence for the cell. Then the cell has been doing all kinds of progressive things making all the different plants and animal species, along with various defense mechanisms intended to allow the fairness desired for each member to thrive for the best. And again, the only problem with this new human mechanism – that can change things for the better at a much faster rate than all things previous – is that each human unit’s original survival development is self-centered, because each human unit’s senses are only hooked up to each individual brain. This causes a “self-centeredness problem” where everyone’s “rationalizing further” is based on, or limited to, the self-centeredness of each individual. Since God can “see everything” (including all the “rationalized futherings”) God knows that there are many victims / drawbacks / limitations caused by this self-centeredness; therefore, God’s primary message (His slight drive) to mankind for optimal progress is the Goldenrule, as God’s can see that a great improvement can be made by people more working together than against each other. Even though most all humans still fight the Goldenrule tooth and nail whenever it’s to their disadvantage, God’s message (slight drive) for it continues. There is logic to the theory that if all of us together felt the same pain and happiness that each individual experiences, instead of our senses being only hooked up to each individual, we’d definitely all work together for mutual improvements and with a very fair concern for each and every individual. But, since God can’t “just” make it that way, like many would tell me he could, the teaching of the Goldenrule is God’s only way. Ironically, the fact that humans have shown that their years of progressive achievement, by the many examples of working together (instead of apart as each animal basically does), God now has the knowledge that working together is what’s best; therefore the Goldenrule has precedence, and Fair Afterlife Punishment is the keystone to that development. With God’s knowledge that our entire memory data set (our “soul”) can be recreated by future data retrieval vibration scan technology, God can use this leverage to substantiate a promise of a good, happy, better Afterlife, but only for those who solidly practice His all important Goldenrule (see Matt. 25:34-46 and Matt. 5:23-26). In fact, Jesus actually further stresses the importance for us to “forgive” one another’s wrongs, as God could easily see through history that Hebrew / Muslim eye for eye, tooth for tooth didn’t work correctly / in correct fairness, because of our past animal survival anger mechanism placed in us all from our heritage. (If animals didn’t have the fairness anger mechanism, animals would not have survived to be able to have become humans.) Also, the emotional mechanism of fear was essential, as there is a time to fight and a time to run. Without it animals would have just walked off cliffs. Without the sense of both pleasant and repulsive smells, we were “guided” by God to pursue food and to not eat our defecations. – And that’s some powerful Godly influence. And once the obvious correlation of the pole in the hole felt so good, we didn’t have to worry about our species dying out because of our bodily duration limits (another “bug” in our software, that, I’m sorry but, God can’t “just” fix; but, hopefully that newly completed human ability for technological advances will). Dead corpses also rather quickly emit a very repulsive smell, telling us it’s not food. (The tradeoff is to not make a live person / animal smell the same way or we’d never have sex. So there is a little time in-between death and stench that makes us think it’s okay to eat animals – another “bug in the software.”) Overall, in other words, God knows what’s going on everywhere, but is very limited in how much He (or His further emanating slight “drive” creations / manipulations) can “just” change it, even when He, or I should better say His human-achieved “further rationalizings” know it. Concerning God’s promise of Fair Afterlife Judgment, MANY of you should pray hard that God is a liar, that God will instead teach all in the promised future Kingdom of God that lying is what’s best, and is the integrity standard that will be taught for utopia: for a better world and happier people. Or, maybe there is a secondary lying Kingdom being prepared for those who wish an eternal life where everyone lies for self-interest. I’d call that place Hell, knowing how completely unlimited self-centeredness will eventually lead to all you carnivores realizing that humans are food too; where killing one another for a meal will become standard. (Well, all the fruits, vegetables and even animals will be is short supply to motivate all humans to work.) Then when you’re recreated every time you die, you’ll have to continually re-experience the same kind of slavery, torture and slaughter (painful death) forever. Oh, you will get a thrill (and get to eat) when you can kill someone first, but eventually someone will get you for every time your life has to be recreated. Why would the slavemasters allow you to find animals to eat when an empty stomach is more motivation for you to come to work and for you to work harder, and that work is where all the humans are? Sure there will be some animals that work, but animals can’t fight in wars or do technical services very well. Then you’ll all have a strong desire to be mummified to be resurrected for an eventual future happy life, but instead keep finding yourself resurrecting to the same Hell every time. You won’t need to have sex, because everyone will be able to be continually resurrected, and everyone knows experienced workers are much better than starting out from scratch.
Okay, I think I have things figured out a little bit better than does Bill Maher. In the 1990s I had much better answered Bill’s many questions in his current movie Religulous. But, Bill’s correct that few have a clue. There were a few instances in the movie that Bill should have given more credence. He also shows dopes like George W. Bush. All that shows is that Bill already has a pre-fixed agenda against religion regardless, and is not really looking for truth and rational explanations. Bill hasn’t a clue that much of the Bible is allegoric / parabolic and is specified as such, thereby won’t make sense to the majority. The last few verses of the Bible is Christ saying that God can’t stop Bible corruption or exaggeration. For example, according to other historical writings, Noah was an old man who lived in a flood prone area of Mesopotamia. After he and many of his neighbors lost their farm animals by a few big floods through the years, Noah asked God for an answer and was inspired to build a large boat, which he did. Every time it started to rain he’d place all his farm animals (only) into the boat. When the next big flood came, all his neighbors’ animals drowned, but Noah’s boat finally reached a suitable bluff downstream which saved his family and animals. Pretty smart, eh? So, the story got a bit “exaggerated.” I’ve even explained that when technology can detect our memory data, they will be able to resurrect the dead. So there’s now “logic” why you’d better be good. “Dionysus” more resembled the attributes of Jesus than any other deity. Dionysus (Greek) / Bacchus (Roman), the god of eucharistic wine, was most popular for his sex orgies. Get the message now? In fact, all “mystery religions,” including Mithra (gay Persian) and Horus (Egyptian), were noted for their secret nocturnal orgies. To date I’ve found 36 different historically documented accounts of early Christian sex orgies (emanating from Christ, not made up later), most secret and nocturnal. 34 of those are prior to 400 A.D. And it was the primary documented reason for Roman persecutions against Christians. 2000 years ago “virgin” (παρθένος) just meant a young unmarried girl, who may or may not have ever had sex. There were many unmarried “virgin” mothers, especially in Sparta (during the Messenian War). I’m probably the only Christian in the entire world that’s really on top of things. Bill misses the biggest and most important Christian problem / spin of “faith alone.” That’s because atheists want it the same way (freedom to be evil). Overall, the question should not be asking if there’s a God, the question should be exactly what is God? Mormonism is just obviously made up, and therefore not God inspired (nice folks though). Anyone with a good B.S. detector can see that. The promised “second coming” (Christ’s same teachings again) could not be anything greater than the overwhelmingly lost Goldenrule, now in one word. The Devil, Satan, etc. is simply humans’ excessive selfishness. So, you tell me the best way for God to “just” destroy Satan? (Probably with free love.) Bill is right that Jesus spoke strongly against the rich. It has something to do with the fact that the poor are more… needy. Duh. His conveyance that the rich / the money / the evil controls today’s church is totally correct, and therefore should not be stated as just assumption. Revelations actually calls it the Antichrist, meaning the total opposite of Christ’s real teachings, as most Protestant churches actually teach that being good is not what will bring salvation (as Jesus states it’s the only thing that will bring salvation: Matt. 25:34-46). Gospel differences actually more suggest that each was heard and written from various perspectives, and therefore all have a valid basis. If it was all made up, they would have likely prepared just one fully matching account / gospel. This doesn’t mean that there weren’t errors, misinterpretations, and later corruptions; but, very likely no one corrupt (and with power) would have added Jesus’ speech against the rich and for the Goldenrule; where simple “logic” tells that a truly divine man couldn’t be able to speak otherwise. Bill apparently isn’t totally against war, as he didn’t bother to bring up how Christ taught extreme pacifism (“forgive all,” “love your enemies,” even “turn the other cheek”). No selfish man (corruptor against God) would add that kind of stuff to the Bible. The fact that many mainstream “Christian” leaders supported our Iraq invasion, just further proves there could be no better Antichrist than today’s very influential Protestant churches.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I might be able to disseminate my logic and findings? Otherwise, these atheists are going to “win” in the future.
I didn’t hear anything about the evils of sex between single heterosexual people. Did I win that issue back in 1999? If I did, there can be no bigger issue to win. Now the public just needs to be informed. Instead of ignoring the issue for the most part, the church needs to “admit” they were wrong about condemning sex between single people in the past, or every one will continue to believe the error, continuing to make more atheists in new generations. In fact, if those in charge now know about the corruption, when they die, then no one will know, and the hard church condemnation against single people will continue forever.
What, where, when, why, how…?:
Boy, this economic depression we’re getting into is good for getting attention to my writings, but is bad for my personal pocketbook. So you all better hurry up and start listening. You bet I’ve written out a solution, but I‘d like to wait until after the election before publishing it – if you all can somehow hold things together until then.
So you think you’re pretty cute, eh?:
Sarah Palin cleverly shuts down loud heckler by telling him how her son is in Iraq right now to give him the right / Freedom to say what he just said. I’m impressed, and proud that that kind of Freedom is something we agree to die for. Pretty good come back. However, Iraq especially is not a war that is protecting our Freedom of Speech. If fact, I don’t know of anyone who really attacked the United States just because they don’t like us allowing people to talk. That support for war is really absurd. Hitler invaded parts of Europe mainly to get back things he thought was Germany’s, and for good ol’ revenge for the reparations and being blackballed / sanctions. He definitely proved that the German’s aren’t going to be pushed around under his watch. (We didn’t continue taxing the Germans for the reparations after WWII for some reason; so, if you were a German who lived through WWII you ended up being better off… all the way to 1961 [when the reparations would have ended].) However, oddly Hitler didn’t see the benefit of the U.S.’s good-hearted offer to move all Jews to West Texas? Some things we’ll never understand. The communists were really threatening us with war totally for defensive purposes against our obvious desire to take over their freedom to be communists. And they lost. Right now Microsoft is helping our government end Internet file sharing to have the Internet access only one very large central database, so the government can control what people read. So if that doesn’t have anything to do with suppression of Freedom of Speech then I’ll eat my hat. I’ll eat your hat if the people fall for it. Its preliminary release is Windows Vista. (I’ll probably eventually have to eat your hat.)
Apparently Sarah has a cleaver advisor, but neither are obviously able to think outside their box.
Plus, there are Christians and Jews living in these countries which are “enemies” of ours, so Freedom of Religions cannot be a cause for their aggression.
Attention surveillance harassers:
If you don’t like my Freedom of Speech, then instead of harassing and trying to entrap me, write your legislators and tell them to change it (to drop the First Amendment). Otherwise you’re all a bunch of dumb, worthless, Hell-bound, trouble-making, cowardice idiots, who only know how to talk really well behind someone’s back. Just because John Lennon had to put up with your crap doesn’t mean I should have to. If you’re not smart enough to understand something, then email me, and I’ll explain it to you. And somehow “realize” that you are the real enemies of Freedom – specifically that you are the true essence of what our soldiers are sent overseas to kill. Try to fathom the possibility that the time you waste me in delivering my messages to the world, the more greater suffering you will have to undergo in your Afterlife, by probably a trillion fold compared to your harassment of anyone else. And, Afterlife suffering is at the point where you are totally unable to make amendable restitution no matter how hard you try. Now, knowing the real ethical standards of individuals in this country, and that everything is a game to you all, it makes total sense to me why you would be laughing at me right now. Don’t worry, if my stuff is all bunk, no one is “just” going to change to it. Simply because I’m “nobody.”
Maverick (it’s apparently what the people are saying they want):
I think the reason I like Democrats / Obama more is because if like this new hypothesis that fluoride in our drinking water is causing us problems had merit, John McCain would be the type who would hear the benefits for the few behind closed doors and say okay for it to continue, where Obama is more the kind that will have it researched and changed if it’s really hurting the American people. The same for product label dishonesty / misleading statements: standard in this country. Courts convicting people for Freedom of Speech violations, via frivolous charges / entrapments / flat-out lies. Cures and preventives for STDs / AIDS. These suppressed cancer cures, supposedly to profit the few in the medical field. In a country where the government and the media all say that it’s our “Freedom” we are protecting when we wage war, there has to be a ton of other misconceptions and corruptions of true information that’s harmful for the majority of Americans, or even just the little man. Especially since no one fears Fair Afterlife Judgment anymore. Apparently the media doesn’t have the resources to investigate a lot of it, but the government does. Barack Obama looks like the kind of guy who might have this kind of stuff investigated. That’s probably the most important thing a President can do today, more than any other issue, for the betterment of the vast majority (or even just fairness for the little man). He might have to fire or jail people who threaten him into not investigating these things; but, if he’s anything like me, he would be glad to know on his deathbed that he did them. I’ve even heard that the voting process is fixed. My guess is that it isn’t overall, but by each county / precinct, I don’t know what’s set up to make sure a bunch of the “wrong” ballots don’t end up in the county landfill. If it’s just “trusting” one or two people, then I’d set up something better. Probably insulting to the executive directors but generically likely a real necessity. If I was President, you know I wouldn’t not investigate something just because some people wouldn’t like it. Too bad I’m one of the very few. A church taught Jesus-quoted fear of Fair Afterlife Judgment (with an honesty about Bible sex words) would nip it in the bud, but since that’s not going to happen, more regulations and surveillance work targeting people who are really hurting Americans should be considered.
Bad news for Barack Obama:
After seeing today’s election polls, John McCain warned Barack Obama that he is taking off the gloves. The good news is that he’s leaving the diaper on.
Well, I can’t really take credit for that joke. I probably should give credit to Conan O’Brien, which I’ll consider doing in the next mailing.
An American Carol (movie):
Yeah. Good! I think all intelligent liberals should see the movie. They’ll learn even more about conservatives while reading through the spin. I mean if the producers weren’t so evil, they could have presented the truth that America needs, instead of the same old one-sided stories intended to promote more war. Like they could have told about the Amiriyah civilian shelter and told that “Christians” did that (more likely Protestant “Christians”). Right? You betcha I’m right. I mean unless it’s stopped soon, this kind of evil will cause the end of mankind, simply because they are so dumb that they end up believing their own bias lies, and will therefore always promote war driven by the word “fairness.”
http://www.answers.com/Amiriyah%20shelter, “Amiriyah shelter”:
“At 4:30 am the morning of 13 February, two F-117 stealth bombers each dropped a 2,000 pound, laser-guided, GBU-27 munition on the shelter. The first cut through ten feet of reinforced concrete before a time-delayed fuse exploded. Minutes later the second bomb followed the path cut by the first bomb.[3] People staying in the upper level were incinerated by heat, while boiling water from the shelter's water tank killed those below.[4]”
Yeah. Let’s let the American people know who their real enemy is. People like Hannity almost nightly implies that we don’t kill civilians.
… More than 400 people were killed; reports vary and the registration book was incinerated in the blast.[4] The dead were overwhelmingly women and children because men and boys over the age of 15 had left the shelter to give the women and children some privacy. The blast sent shrapnel into surrounding buildings, shattering glass windows and splintering their foundations.[5]
I still say the worse evil is the media who ignores this for obvious (Hell-bound) reasons. This would let the American people know that cop-out “Christians” (e.g., Bush) do the same against innocent civilians, the same as Muslims. NO ETHICAL DIFFERENCE. No one is ever justified in killing innocent people, which can only be for bias selfish, cowardice, and unfair reasons. If we didn’t do these kinds of things, then the argument that it’s just the Muslims, etc. who are evil would hold water. It’s very clear to me what kinds of people will definitely be going to Hell. And I bet it’s mainly those are relying 100% on the Jesus-contradicted faith alone. Even those who will be rewarded for their many good-deeds for the poor, will be ultimately condemned for ignoring the more importantly destructive evil in the world. I mean Jesus in Matt. 25:34-46 says He was all these victims in the Amiriyah shelter. So if you’re an informed news agency, and you even convey that it’s the Muslims who are the only bad ones, then Jesus says you are going to “everlasting punishment” for ignoring Him. And all the truth where we’ve killed other innocent people that I don’t know about, will all come out in the news people’s disfavor in the Afterlife. I mean the richer you are, the more you have the power to hurt more innocent people, therefore the power to place yourself deeper in Hell. You need to “realize” that those dead innocent people can’t talk for themselves right now, but in your Afterlife, they’ll be right there being heard by God in your case. So, you be sure to tell them how much you supported the American soldiers (only), and anyone who voted for the wars, or for Bush in 2004, etc. And pray hard that God is both a dumb God and an unfair God. Don’t tell me I didn’t warn you all in advance.
You say it’s okay to kill civilians as long as there’s a military gain (even in speculation), (which just fully justifies 9/11). You also thought this (and still do for the next war): “I really do believe we will be greeted as liberators” –Dick Cheney, 3-16-03. “But I believe, Katie, that the Iraqi people will greet us as liberators” –John McCain, 3-20-03. So, please explain to me how I’m the dumb one when America’s top trusted minds actually do “believe” the opposite of simple reality. If Ronald Reagan in 1983 did something wrong to the Soviets, then they killed a lot of your brothers and sisters to remove Reagan from office, and add it 12 years of prior economic sanctions, would you greet the Soviets as liberators? “Dumb”: It definitely runs our country.
Whenever you say you’re justified in killing an innocent person, then there’s no stability at all. Even when you “think” it will save the lives of many other innocent people (which is rarely the true case), it will not, as the destabilization of an allowance will eventually kill many, many times more. That takes a two-step thinking process, so you’d never get that on your own. I mean it’s like no American soldier in Iraq right now thinks / realizes they deserve to get shot.
Get Smart:
It’s the ol’ We bomb ‘em, they’ll like us trick.
There are other ways to base logic:
In Old Testament times, was Jezebel a prostitute and Daphne a nymph, or was Daphne the prostitute and Jezebel the nymph? Well, since Jezebel has “bel” in her name, any woman tinkling bells as she walked by, had to have been a prostitute.
The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Brown, Zondervan Publishing, 1976, vol. 2, p. 582, “Marriage | μοιχεύω”:
With a capital A and a period. With modern interpretation “old Ass.” fits.
Well, it’s all more rational than our top government leaders’ logic. It’s amazing the little difference between asses born in the second millennium B.C. and the 1930s, compared to the big differences in people born in the 1960s. Apparently the human mind already knows it all by the age of 20.
“COUNTRY FIRST”:
…says the latest McCain campaign signs. In other words: Country First – Right or Wrong! In other words, we’re going to have a lot more wars and be subjected to a lot more terrorism as Country First means unfairness to other countries, as a people who only have one-step thinking skills cannot think beyond that limitation. Add in that we are an entire country full of people who have lived constant lies their entire lives, making logic and truth so very hard to attain. But, it’s logically evident that this country will eventually fall on its own ignorance. I mean, a poor person has to know what’s really going on just to keep his head above water. Any mistakes he makes, he definitely pays for. When you are rich, you can make many mistakes that will have to be paid by others. This makes it very easy to believe your own lies and all your friends’ lies, and no harm comes to you. Until, not only when Fair Afterlife Judgment comes, and not only when Rome thinks it can never fall, but when Rome finally thinks it does those other countries favors by killing their innocent people (and creating economic sanctions against same). And Republicans have fully reached that climax, including all others who voted for the Iraq war. And, John McCain appears to be even more war aggressive minded then even Bush was. I think we’re guaranteed WWIII with John McCain, and it’s just a good possibility of WWIII with Barack Obama, but only because George W. Bush just accomplished making even more valid justifications against the United States during his administration. And because when I hear about Russia or someone trying to pull something, anymore I just assume the more realistic probability that we try to “pull” ten things to every one thing someone else “pulls.” Add to definition: “Pull”: “To carry out a deception or swindle for one’s self-centered advantage or pride, which one’s news media agrees to keep silent.”
John McCain:
–Perfecting the Old Ass laws. So he can be an even bigger… ass.
You know the more Obama wins, the more future Presidents will think before starting to bomb people. So all true Christians should be praying Obama wins by a large margin.
Cause it, then complain about it:
When Ted Nugent tells people who oppose hunting that he’s going to shoot a deer for them, he’s just provoking the contempt which he complains about getting. Me? I provoke argument on my subjects because I fully like not hearing how I’m wrong.
Is profanity easy to say, but hard to clean?:
Profanity is something angry people resort to when they don’t have an intelligent / winning argument. Ted has to be the profanity king at his concerts. If one can’t explain their point using non-profane words, then they apparently don’t have as “winning” of an argument as I do. Profanity in humor caters to the younger / immature mind, as problematic school kids like saying and hearing what they’re not supposed to say and hear. Sure, it’s breaking loose in Freedom, but it’s the “dumb” way of doing it. I say break loose into Freedom by having open sex. The restrictions of sex adolescents find, could be the prime / base subconscious reason why so many wish rebellion of other kinds. “Subconscious” because no one wants to feel or be seen as the kind of “pervert” who’s not sexually satisfied: Traditionally, boys tend to brag like they get more than they really do, and girls don’t want to look or feel like a slut or whore. In later years, boys find their desire for more than one woman brings more disdain from women than good, therefore suppressing their natural pursuit of variety. Many times men will feel perverted and inferior when pursuing more than just one woman, and such will convey they are not sexually satisfied. (All the more reason high libidos like Clinton are embarrassed when it’s exposed.) The “slut” and “whore” shame and scorn established by the church targeted against women, elaborated in Revelation 12 (particularly verses 4 & 13), is sufficient to suppress most women’s desire for variety; even to the most evil point of condemning her totally innocent male child at birth with the word “bastard.” It’s so bad that another miracle has to be instituted by later Christians to explain the “bastard” Jesus Christ, as in Biblical times, the Greek word parthenos (virgin) meant an “unmarried” girl. Again, all of Christ’s miracles were something that could be seen, tasted, or felt by the senses to substantiate / report the claim, as God can only manipulate sub-atomic vibrations creating hallucinations / lies. Immaculate conception can only be conjecture. It’s like you can pray to God for a million bucks, and God “can” make you see it, but the “reality” is that it won’t really buy anything. Then when God makes it seem like you’re buying everything, then your progressive purpose for life is totally gone. Or like God could create an illusion that your spouse is not leaving you, but the “reality” will eventually tell you she really is. In other words, God can’t really abruptly change the laws of physics and chemistry, or He wouldn’t need to give us instructions in the Bible: He can’t “just” make it all happen the way He wants / knows is best. And working hallucinations and reality back and forth doesn’t work either. Jesus even told that the miracles were essential to get that very superstitious society to believe and support His cause. Today (or post-1960s), miracles more harm support for Jesus (causing more atheism), therefore the reality of their unreality can now be explained. Jesus’ miracles also have metaphoric meanings. You don’t really want God to intervene in your life with miracles, because again, they won’t do you any real good.
Gas is $2.49 a gallon:
I appreciate President Bush using his Presidential powers to get gas prices to suddenly and dramatically drop. I’m going to take advantage of that! I think he’s smart enough to know that the American public will assume that he’s the one who really has control of it and vote for John McCain as a result. No, no, no: the public won’t thing you had anything to do with those past exceedingly high gas prices, they’ll credit you only for bring the price down. So, keep ‘em down.
I don’t even want to think what George is going to do to revenge a country that tells their high disapproval of him and his party if Barack Obama happens to win the election. Last June delivered a good punishment though, but maybe we ain’t seen nothing yet. (MS Word is trying to get me to change “nothing” to “anything.”) We all know what George will do when he’s angry at someone. I guess electing an even angrier man would be the greater ass thing to to. Why not just say that Obama wears polka dot underwear, and emphasis that that’s the reason people should vote for John McCain. Then when they do, I won’t feel so bad when they reach their demise. I don’t think Obama’s going to start blowing up things in this country like Ayers did. If Obama has the same kind of sympathy for those killed by Americans during war, like Ayers has (like I do), then Obama being like Ayers would be a good thing.
The American warmonger mind:
McCain’s war philosophy only makes sense if you believe that all terrorists are “just” doing it for the fun of it, or because they despise our allowing people to talk (Freedom); and, that every time we bomb them, they will get scared and stop it realizing they’re evil (not feel justified for more). Or, is it that the warmonger Americans already know what’s really going on, but don’t give three hoots, and only want unfairness for their self-centered entertainment (of the game)? I think it’s the former.
So, maybe he’s really not that smart:
It’s kind of hard to believe Obama’s so naive to not see the correlation of his lipstick-pig saying and Sarah Palin. When I first heard it, I thought he was calling her a pig; as it also insinuates that she is not anywhere near a pit bull. Rather drastic I thought, compared to normal campaign rhetoric. So, maybe he’s really not that smart. If he becomes President, I suspect he’ll need a lot of guidance. Or, if he meant it to apply to Palin, then lied about it later, then who knows what else he’ll lie about as President. Too bad we can’t have a good majority person: Apparently the rich white male stereotype has finally lost most all of its integrity. I think the people today want more of a moral / ethical leader, than another pit bull. I think they’re fed up with the pit bulls. So, my website is what should be the sole guidance for the next President, as it is designed for what’s best for the people (even though they might not fully know it yet). And now Obama is trying to make everyone think he’s just another pit bull; ever though concern for the poor and justice is what made him popular in the first place. Barack, you need to realize the few have a very predominate voice, but the people might really like the old you better.
Pit bull victim:
Sarah Palin wants to make it clear that she will be proud to use her lipstick to do this to our enemies.
Good thing I’m not voting for anybody.
Mr. Critical – Finding fault in everyone! (It’s just best if Mr. Critical doesn’t even know who you are.)
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/