Subject: Nein! Nein! Nein! Nein! Nein! Nein! Nein! NEIN!
Okay Hannity, calm down: calm down! Apparently he read my parody on the Inglourious Basterds in my last letter. Hannity refutes: “We can’t allow the Jews – I mean the Taliban! – safe havens! Because, if religious cop-outs like the Western Wall isn’t valid, then I’m in deep trouble.” Well, I’m just saying that our mass genocide of the Taliban, including all bystanders, can’t be the answer. Get the Jews out of Palestine, then let’s see what happens. They’ll be only losing “one” religious cop-out; I’m sure they have many more to fall back on. If not, join any Protestant Church; and if you have lots of money, then I assure you: they will tell you what you want to hear. If the Jews cherish cop-outs, now’s the right time to accept the pseudo Christ of the Protestant Church.
10-19-09!
Please understand that my advice works best if done before a big goof is ordered. But, quit killing the Taliban and I’ll try to reckon out the best way to handle it from there.
What I’ve been taught:
I’ve been taught that Hitler’s mass genocide endeavor of the Jews was just because he was a mad man, and therefore was going to all that trouble just for the fun of it. I also don’t know the reason why Roosevelt refused to allow the Jews sanctuary in the United States at the time. And, that our mass genocide endeavor of the Taliban is because – well, because America is never in the wrong. Just ask anyone in Oklahoma. Now, I haven’t heard any American media leader tell that the Jews in Palestine is the root cause of 9/11, etc.; but, every message I’ve heard from our enemies state it. Of course, that’s going to cause conflict in my mind since the vast majority of my learning has been that, luckily, America is always in the right. Now, there’s speculation out there that when countries were picking sides for WWI and WWII, choices were made by who’s more their friend or ally rather than determining right from wrong. In other words, if the country you’re going to side with, since they’re more of a friend but actually the one ethically in the wrong, it doesn’t make the slightest bit of difference: full support will be given to the last man, where everyone on the opposite side deserves a horrible death. Tell me if I’m wrong, because I wasn’t defined as a “gifted” student in school, but I think that’s the real way things were determined by every participating county. I know there’s still a great deal of ignoring of certain very relevant facts by our media that’s not complimentary to the United States; but if we have a “left” that is actually “talking” about ethics and fairness (instead of “just” saying it), then I would say the world has made a great step since the early 1900s.
I think the proper sequence teaching is to support (1) your family, (2) your city or state (football), (3) your country. All “right or wrong”! I don’t know what the “pride” in other countries is, but that’s definitely what gets taught in this country. Of course, “me generation” people going the total opposite, where they only care about themselves, isn’t the answer either. So, when I say the Goldenrule, I say “think” about if that in any way includes bias favoritism. Because to me, again I’m not “gifted,” but I think it is entirely talking about not being bias or having favoritism. So, since it is the Word of God from every major religion, shouldn’t it deserve to be at the top of every religious website? Well, I put it at the top of mine, anyway. Of course, for some reason, all you other religious websites somehow have the audacity to think that God somehow more favors your website than mine.
Flier I received from AT&T:
“4 is better than 1.” I think I could make some use of their advertising logic in my next promotion for open sex.
CNN is looking for a “hero.”
Since they also have ears, and therefore have learned many things in this society, I think it’s going to be very difficult for them to locate the “hero.”
I forgot to add to my ACORN like surveillance slander against me grievance in my last letter:
I mean, I see Fox News every day exaggerating while ignoring very important pertinent facts on misc. issues; so, if I’m never allowed to defend myself, then only the worst of the worst can be played out in slander to those who are asked to help authorities in their surveillance against me, which is just for spite, because of my exercise of Freedom of Speech. (They’re looking for any reason to get me.) And, if there’s never any truth check, then I’m certain it gets shared as the worst, which just angers more authorities, etc. against me. Sounds like they’re right next to a law that says they can just shoot me whenever they want, without ever allowing me to argue my case. And, I know I’ve argued a few cases in courts before and lost just because of favoritism, but at least I’m getting a chance to explain the real facts to “someone,” and that would be a giant step to what I now have to accept.
Realize that when I stated things like if Osama bin Laden deserves death, then logically / ethically George W. Bush deserves death, because Bush killed many more innocent people than bin Ladan did, and anyone who believes that just bin Laden deserves death is a idiot, doesn’t mean “I” have any intentions or even any personally desire to kill Bush, which I don’t. But, there’s no way I can make rational / truthful comparisons / points, just in case someone in this extremely dumb and evil country has a bit of fairness or logic defined in their morals. Again, like Judge Andrew Napolitano said: Freedom of Speech is saying something the government doesn’t like; therefore, should not be grounds for your continued effort to “get me.” If you don’t like constructive criticism, then complain to God!
The government doesn’t arrest anyone for Freedom of Speech per se; but, laws allow the government to harass you if you do give rational / fair advice for an improved future.
Any kind of further harassment, slander, computer slowness, etc. I receive from the government will be deemed as their suppression of Freedom of Speech.
Protesters call U.S. troops coming home “baby killers!”:
Fox News indicated that they’re condemning the soldiers who have actually been in Afghanistan fighting for the protestors’ Freedom. Maybe the protesters are saying that they are willing to sacrifice their personal Freedom so those innocent babies can live. I’m sure Fox News would call that “dishonorable.” Me, I would choose to give up my entire life in exchange for one innocent baby to remain alive. So, I have to be listed as the MOST “dishonorable” to the Fox News Channel. I mean, I have been losing loads of money doing all my writings and research, where I’ll probably end up homeless; so, I am sacrificing my entire life so those babies can live. It’s another think that makes me better than the rest of you all! Hannity would surely tell our troops to kill as many babies as necessary if there’s the slightest change of him losing his Freedom, or if there’s the slightest chance of us having to say “we lost” in our support of Israel. O’Reilly feels the same way, but might change his mind if he actually saw the innocent babies being killed. Most Americans would say that if the choice is that they would have to die (or, lose some Freedom; or, have to “say” we lost Jerusalem) so babies in Afghanistan could live, then, heck, that’s one of the easiest choices they’ve ever had to make: the babies die so they can live (or, stay Free; or, to “continue” to say “we won”)! Don’t you like life better when decisions are “easy”?
Fox News reports that things today are so bad, that for every one job available, there are six people trying / needing to get it (six people available for every one job):
Well, it just tells that the time is right for implementing my economic advice that gives everyone a Basic Needs Allotment. You see, since Private Enterprise does work very well, things are getting technologically better all the time. But, when things are really getting better, then that means there’s less people needing to work to get it all done, hence the above statistic. Sure, to regress so everyone has to do more work, some businesses like Microsoft do everything they can to antiquate everyone’s old reliable programs (which made computers the useful tool that they are), just for the sake of change, and to make everyone purchase all new every few years. And, many of those newer programs aren’t really as good as their older versions. Google toolbar is a great example; which forces updates whether you want it or not. Pathetic! But, since most businesses actually have higher ethical standards, the above statistic is likely to just get “worse,” again, as long as things overall are getting better thanks to Private Enterprise. So, implement “my” plan, to lessen the suffering of “Americans,” who are going to end up unemployed. The ONLY thing standing in the way is the very high degree of “dumbness” in America’s MOST gifted people, like Obama, O’Reilly, etc. It would be easier to teach a cat to read a newspaper, than for “gifted” humans to think outside the box. What’s apparently very “easy” for “gifted” humans, is for themselves to conclude that they can and do think outside the box. So, let’s change the cat to a chicken being able to read a newspaper. I really believe that it’s the people who don’t communicate well and are slow (and maybe ugly), who have the aptitude to reckon outside the box. (1) They generally aren’t constantly influenced as much by outside sources, (2) They are more open-minded, and don’t need to “impress” as much to “fit in,” and (3) being slower allows for the more time needed to wallow in the facts, and (4) People who have lots of friends are much more pressured to reach quick conclusions, with mostly just “the right answer,” determined by what’s most going to “impress” the listener. Like police are reputed to be quick-quick-quick in speech and conclusions. That’s why most of their decisions are based on bias and favoritism, because bias and one-sided thinking is easy-easy-easy; and even impresses the other officers more; because evil-evil-evil is the easy-easy-easy thing we’ve all been taught. “Taught” here means not what we’ve been “verbally” taught, but what’s “really” going on to impress others / gain favor and bring smiles to their faces (“reading between the lines”). It is very difficult for people with power, like police and judges, to abandon these traits, because few “smart” people are going to try to correct them, and pride is always being right (they all have little abstract brooms and rugs). I know most police officers “think” they are good, but that just means they comply with all the written rules (including laws that shouldn’t be laws) and/or influencing standards, which still in this day and age, includes a lot of incidental evil-evil-evil, but don’t realize it because it’s not said as such.
If “never hurt an ‘innocent’ person” was the taught (and influencing) standard, then it’d pinpoint / emphasize a perfect moral / fairness ethic. Most would tell me that it’s “there” today, but what overrules it is our primitive limited-thinking priority of favoritism for friends, family, country, color, gender, etc., as such is the easy-easy-easy way for the dumb human mind. There probably are other animals out there that are smarter than the dumb human ape, that can figure out new things better and quicker; and, would pass us all up if they just had the prerequisite superiority of high communication skills. Again, I know you think I’m wrong, but humans wouldn’t be able to do hardly anything if we didn’t have our ability to communicate. Everything you see around you is a result of thousands of years of taught prerequisites. If we didn’t have our prerequisites for say prior to the last hundred years, we’d still be living in the woods or caves, and would not have any higher communication skills other than a few emotional sounds. We wouldn’t even know how to defend ourselves with a rock or stick until it happened on accident. Similarly, the entire universe is progressing on accidents, but with the underlying intelligence / drive (God) to judge what’s good and what’s not good, can pressure just enough physical or numerical deviations to make things slowly get better. We really just comprise of the same basic thing. When we’re a baby, we know little more than emotional impulse, then later don’t understand why we can’t always get what we want, then later find that conflicts with what others is much of the main reason, thereby concocting methods of lying, etc. to get what we want. We “learn” that there’s a need for the Goldenrule. This slight “drive” of God, from out of the ground, via evolution, and our independent learning is what has caused us to achieve to this point.
It just makes sense that “ignorant” people can think outside the box better than those who are imbeddedly taught very well inside the box. They can consider farther out, and if they are honest and can block out their personal desires, there should be no limit. I’d still like to know how many years it took for gifted car radio designers to realize that the “knob” is the best device to use in adjusting the volume.
So, Mr. Critical, how great is the Kingdom of God in the Afterlife?
The Kingdom of God in the Afterlife is so great that if God gave you conclusive evidence that Jesus’ Word is God’s Word, you would all commit suicide to get there sooner. And, then our purpose on this Earth would all be in vain. But, Jesus did prove that He is the Son of God while carrying his cross, when He prophesied that women who have never had sex would be later defined as the most blessed by His later corrupted church (Luke 23:28-31; Rev. 6:15-16). How could This Man have pre-known known that so accurately, if He wasn’t the Son of God? But, few today will use this as conclusive evidence as proof to refute the atheists, for obvious reasons. So, today’s church simply can’t properly refute the atheists. Simply incredible!
Alan Colmes:
He was fired for doing his job too well: He just did too good of a job making things “fair and balanced.” I guess he should have realized that the big talk “fair and balanced” has always been just a bunch of bull at Fox News, and instead acclimatized. But, I’m glad he didn’t.
Apparently Ted Nugent also got fired at Fox News:
Fox News has now hired The Lynyrd Skynyrds to take over the rather rare rock ‘n’ roll conservative position. They represent the poor Southern Man, to help the instilling overwhelming conservative brainwash of taking from the poor to give to the rich. I know, I know: A Southern man don't need Mr. Critical around. They said they have some liberals in the band though. So, that’s gotta be an improvement. On Ted’s band membership application, at the very top it states: “Do you not only hunt, but do you enjoy it when you shoot an innocent animal? Does it make you feel more manly?” Then “Do you support our troops, right or wrong?” Then lastly “Do you disagree with everything a liberal or democrat says? Like if a democrat says he had pancakes for breakfast, do you make certain that you never have another pancake?” Of course, since we now live in an era where terrorists are flying planes into our buildings, I think the time has come to quit being a “Simple Man” by taking our mothers’ advice, and rethink what’s gonna work best. Or, I should say, considering how Afghanistan is going, “what works.”
Now, for the defenseless animals, Mr. Critical, show something comparative:
I think it’s best to cook it first. You might lose some of the nutrients, but it’ll taste better.
Mr. Critical – Getting to the point better. Happy Halloween.
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/