10-08-09: Okay, okay: I’m ready to bootlick:

Subject: Okay, okay: I’m ready to bootlick:

And, they say that bootlicking to the right people is key. So, I’m starting with a to go order for Bruschetta and Smoked Mozzarella Fonduta. Then I’ll have ‘em box up their Garden-Fresh Salad accompanied by oven-warn dinner rolls. Then for the main event: Five Cheese Ziti al Forno (“forno” here refers to an “oven”). Then I’ll end it all with Torta di Chocolate and a Black Tie Mousse Cake. And, a bottle of wine (possibly a Principato Rosso and/or a Marchesi di Barolo). Then I’ll have to find the right bridge or abandoned warehouse, to serve Jesus the way the King of Kings should be served. Okay, I’ve done it. Now I have a guaranteed place in Heaven (Matthew 25:32-40)! And, I made some homeless people think I’m Jesus! All the rest of you can keep thinking I’m crazy!

10-8-09

You’re not going to hear the way Jesus stated how Judgment will be, on the O’Reilly Factor. So I’ll submit it to Hannity.

O’Reilly would contend that “the Bible explicitly states that Jesus said that Judgment will be determined by who has control of Jerusalem and prayer at Herod’s temple (now the Western Wall) is the only way to salvation; because Jesus preached there; and because Herod the Great was the gentleman who murdered all the young children under the age of three in Judea, and that his son beheaded John the Baptist. And, that anything else is “crazy”! So, this is the reason the Jews need to control the entire area, and why we should bomb Iran. After we bomb Iran, they will all-of-a-sudden understand the ethical fair reason why we can have nuclear weapons and they can’t, and will thank us for setting them straight, instead of a never ending terrorism against the U.S. until all Iranians are dead. They will understand the obvious error of Iranian critics who assert that Americans wouldn’t protect them from an attack from an adjacent country, thereby needing nuclear protection, because of our 1980s supplying of Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, that helped kill many Iranians; in fairness to the 1979 hostage situation where no one died. So, to assert that America was the one who ‘started’ the killing (of Iranians) is absurd. Or, we don’t care, and just want to be able to say we won! It really is worth the risk of the possible end of mankind (according to George W. Bush).”

Well, I can agree that I must be “crazy” if I’m really thinking that a people who are always right, would offer West Texas as the Israeli solution, or even just offer it just to fully expose the true objective of the Jews, that all their need for safety is 100% male bovine fecal matter.

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t:

United Nations speech 9-24-09: Benjamin Netanyahu puts Iran down for still living in the ninth century; but, complains about their 20th century nuclear technology. Benjamin stresses how much Israel just strives for peace. That’s like me burglarizing my neighbor’s house, then crying just for peace, while he’s employing violence to get his stuff back. Apparently some in the United Nations are not so dumb.

The reason why Fox News supports Israel:

Anyone with an I.Q. over 100 knows that Fox News caters to the wealthy. The wealthy also worry that something created all this: that everything didn’t materialize and improve just because of random accidents; therefore, they worry about God and their soul in the current and/or Afterlife. Since Jesus is the predominate connecting figure to God, wealthy people who don’t want to help or give to the poor, worry lots about Jesus stating that they need to help and give to the poor. Therefore, they love the artificial salvation religious cop-outs, mainly taught in the Protestant churches, which tell that they can remain evil (not against Christ’s name, but against Christ’s instructions) and still have everything they want when they get to Heaven, and not going to Hell. Since verbal bootlick works very well with the extreme ego-pride selfishness in humans who have more authority (mainly for image purposes), they feel confident that it will work well with just the name of “Christ” instead of His instructions. Since Israel’s sole purpose for controlling the Holy Land is the same kind of artificial salvation cop-out, concurs with the desires of the wealthy over here. Plus, when the wealthy take that trip to Jerusalem, they too can sense the artificial benefits from the prayers that they speak during their visit; again, just to satisfy their desire to not help the poor and unlucky (to a sufficient degree). Now, all foreign countries love having tourists visit their sites, because it’s a great source of income for them. But, if Muslims have control of Jerusalem, then they won’t want the Jews to come visit – even though they’d be giving the Muslims / Arabs their tourist dollars – simply because the Jews will cause way too much trouble during their visit, in protest of not having control of the land of their distant ancestors. So, the only way the Jews can visit the Western Wall, etc. to their liking, is to control the government there. Same scenario with the Muslims. So, the ONLY way this continuous, never-ending problem can be solved is by a firm, embedded teaching of the Goldenrule as the only way for pleasing God, as stated in the Bible; and, I don’t know any large religious organization that supports it like I do, as everything under the title of my website must conform to the Goldenrule. Even when it allows torture and violence, there has to be a “guilty” violator intending to hurt an “innocent” person. The Golden Rule at other religious websites are somewhere down a ways, if there at all. Therefore, again, I’m the ONLY living person that can teach a better way that will solve all these kinds of problems. Since Jesus’ priortity instruction was a strong Goldenrule, I believe that God fully supports and has to be very well pleased with my endeavor, even though “I” will end up homeless if I continue much longer. Other than the fact that I’m “a nobody” and predominately because you’ve all been taught otherwise, tell me how I’m wrong? Come on O’Reilly and Hannity, you’re always complaining when others don’t come on your shows to voice their errors, just have someone email me and tell me how I’m wrong?

Plus, many conservatives have to constantly feel those cop-out reliefs, to be able do the dishonesty in their daily business or employment.

Yeah, knowing what it’s like for a family of homeless people looking at you like you’re Jesus, is just something a Republican will never experience.

At UN conference, George W. Bush’s enemies (Chavez, etc.) praise Obama:

Republicans say that’s bad, thinking Obama will give our country to our enemies. But, I think it’s good to have our enemies liking our President, as it should lessen/eliminate possible hostilities; but, no fun for Hannity. Boy, I tell ya’, if the left and the right in this country were geographically divided, there’d surely be a major violent civil war. The Bible talks like people will be either/or, so things may just be accumulating for Judgment Day. Basically divided by the smarter very selfish rich, and the pretty dumb liberals.

Hannity says school kids who singed a song in favor of Obama is an outrage and is indoctrination:

But, if school kids had sung about President Bush, he’d insist that they should have the Freedom to praise their leader, and that those left-wing liberals who are against it as despicable and anti-American. I guess it’s called spin. Just realize that if the world ends soon, it’s because of all the worthless and troublemaking voices of high influence. Since money is not only the factor that determines what practically everyone thinks, even what O’Reilly calls the liberal media isn’t even close to knowing what’s really needing to be accomplished. That means Obama has barely a clue.

Hannity is speaking out for the farmers in central California:

It must have something to do with putting down Obama, or something; because, I know Hannity doesn’t care about any poor farmers who are being victimized. But, I shouldn’t knock it, because hopefully it could become a fad amongst Republicans. I’m all for people talking for the poor and needy, even if they don’t personally abide by it. If Hannity can get some pats on the back for it, then who knows.

Fox News can’t understand why Iran would have a hidden nuclear facility if they’re for peaceful purposes:

I’m not a top smart media leader, but maybe because of all the threats of those facilities being bombed. You see, if Israel or the U.S. doesn’t know where a facility is, then there’s a much lesser chance of it getting bombed. I speculated years ago that Iran could already have hidden nukes. It does seem kind of funny how Iran is taking all of Israel’s threats of air strikes rather lightly. It would seem like they’re kind of hoping Israel does make a hit, so Iran can nuke Israel all over the map. If that happens, I’ll re-inquire if my West Texas idea was really as crazy as everyone thought. And, I speculate that if “I” can figure out a way to get nukes into Israel via a car or truck to be assembled in a house, then Iran could also pre-figure something like that, and “might” not tell Fox News ahead of time. Shocking evil, therefore hard to believe, but still “possible.” So, Israel might want to have some second thoughts about killing innocent Iranians, even though they have God’s extremely righteous support, of course only while they rule the government around the Western Wall.

Fox News is conveying that International Law states that Iran is not allowed to have military secrets, and the United States can have so many, that when one needs some information from a U.S. non-military government employee, he can just get out of more work by saying that he’s not at liberty to give out that information. Who’s going to question him?

Some websites think Herod the Great (of the “sacred” Western Wall fame) really didn’t order the murders of all children two and younger in all of Judea, because only the Christian book tells of it. Crazy me is thinking that Herod just wanted to out smart and kill the new suspected King, but “might” not have wanted to call in the scribes to make a nice long report of the issue. If he didn’t call for it to be widely documented for some unknown reason, then likely not too many other literates would have even known about it (other than what appeared as isolated incidents from evil militia, for any old excuse). Maybe today’s Jews would be able to make God listen more if they would run the sword through their very own infant(s) at the Western Wall, in honor of King Herod. Oh yeah? – They would if their religious leader suggested it; and, the more articulate he is, the more babies would wish they were never born. Hope there’s no drought next year. I mean, if all that crying at the “Wailing” Wall isn’t giving what one personally wants, then maybe the times right to read up on pagan sacrifice and bring in the virgins.

I can wail:

Whaa! Whaa! Whaa!: I’m a big cry baby! See God, I need things for ME! ME, ME, ME! Maybe I’ll do “some” of Your instruction of the Goldenrule, once I get everything I want FIRST! Whaa! Whaa! Whaa! It’s so important to me that I’ll order the torturous death of every innocent Arab for the slightest possible suggestion to get my way. So, do it for me now, ya’ big wall!

Looks kind of like the Vulcan mind probe:

“Duh, we’re smart enough to know that the God who created all things is only here, not anywhere else (unless He buys a transistor radio with a tuner and earpiece. Then He can maybe hear some things elsewhere).” It’s good to let God know that you’re very, very sad that you’re not getting everything you want (because God doesn’t already know that). And, if that doesn’t work, you can further show you’re serious by bombing Iran.

But, what if God didn’t watch Star Trek? Sounds like bombing Iran is the only answer. I’m so lucky to have been born into a world where the people are “so” smart!

I say if people are so gullible to think that selfish crying on a wall can bring favoritism from God, then they’ll easily believe that sex with multiple partners is good; and, that God will consider “fair” Judgment in the Afterlife. I mean, you can tell none of them are praying for the Goldenrule, because the Goldenrule is not something you have to pray for, it’s something that you “just” do. It’s been “at hand” for a very long time. People, clergymen, etc. tell me that I’m not telling anyone anything they don’t already know (about the Goldenrule), but crazy me has reasons to believe they might not really already know it all.

http://nomad.b3ch.com/TheChangeling.html:

Yeah, I bet they’ll “attack” if it doesn’t work.

“Remember, by son, that the Western Wall is the most important thing in life.” “I will never forget it, father.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Prayer_Papers_in_the_Western_Wall.jpg:

But, what if God doesn’t know how to read, because logic would tell that He’s not in schools if He’s only at the Wall? I should be good to the Jewish people and go there to jam one of my Hebrew dictionaries in a crack. And, what if there’s no more room in a crack for one’s note? Then I guess they have to remove someone else’s first. I just regret that I only have one life to lose in torturous death for this, even here in Olathe eventually.

I’m so lucky.

I think there’s a reason why barbers, government employees, news commentators, etc. who converse the most with lots of people every day, know the least about reality and rational logic.

Yeah, I know the Muslims converse with each other a lot too.

“Remember, by son, that the Dome of the Rock is the most important thing in life.” “I will never forget it, father.”

I’m not always critical:

Kudos to authorities for stopping all those domestic terrorists. Unless they’re all just situations where the informants just talk a disgruntled Muslim into doing a bombing, by first adding to the steam, then by telling them about how to do it, and finally in supplying them with the tools, just to see if he takes the bate. Then, I don’t know, are we really accomplishing anything more than praise for our authorities, and to make the American people think it’s even more necessary to invade Muslim countries? If such is the case, then why not just have very attractive 15-year-old girls work undercover, propositioning every adult male, just to fill the prisons with nearly half the population? Well, if you’re going to do it to one, “fairness” says you should do it to everyone. O’Reilly wouldn’t complain. He’s smart: he converses with a lot of people. I understand that “most” ACORN employees “stinged” didn’t take the bate, which shows that the acceptance of prostitution is not part of their instructing policy, but sounds like they’re going down anyway.

How about offering an open back door to a bank at night to poor people? Then conservatives can be happy with practically all of them in prison for bank robbery. Or, have the informant knock on every door in the ghetto, telling them that all those cars in that parking lot over there are unlocked and have keys in the ignition. Then Obama will look like the only remaining black person who’s free. See, if “I” instead had decided to work for Fox News, then they’d be getting America the way they really want it by now. Again, I know there are statutes against entrapment, but it’s ignored! So, what can anyone do about it? Or, get a 14 year old girl to chat like she craves to have free sex with older men – especially you Mr. Ugly – in this predominately anti-sex / anti-free-sex society. Then every male that is “hard up” as a result, via the true powers of God, can have the rest of their entire lives ruined. And, we’re all actually “think” we’re doing it “for” God.

Economic sanctions against Iran: the “dumbest” thing to do (well, maybe not any dumber than the above):

I know we’re ignoring the unfair wrong of the Jews’ violent intrusion into Palestine; but, sanctions aren’t the right thing to do even when right is on our side. All sanctions do is hurt the people and anger the leader (who’s not going to be missing any meals). Likely the only times where we think sanctioned have worked, it probably wasn’t the sanctions that did it: it was probably a moral point; or, the matter was frivolous enough. Sanctions just “escalate” things toward an assured war, that’s all! Worst case scenario, sanctions are like punishing everyone in the entire classroom for just one kid breaking a rule. – It’ll never sell in logic. Everyone who didn’t break the rule will correctly think that they are being innocently victimized. Which can only create “other kinds of problems.”

What’s the difference between Moammar Gadhafi who ordered the crash of a civilian airplane, killing many innocent people, and an American soldier? Come on, don’t be like those liberals who refuse to echo their dumbness on the O’Reilly show: LET ME KNOW THE ETHICAL DIFFERENCE! you bunch of dumb worthless morons. I’m convinced there’s only “one” who knows the answers to the whole mess.

The inner truth will come down the pike:

Why does one give to the poor? Because he either wants to help the poor or just to buy his way into Heaven? I think it’s commendable and will reap equal rewards in the Afterlife, where O’Reilly tells that he has given millions to the poor. And, he might be in pretty good shape if he just cut hair. But, when he uses his high degree of influence against the poor (the Republican agenda), then I think he’s going to be in lots of trouble for the big picture.

To speak unreligiously:

I personally hope Iran does level Israel, then the problem will be over with! Otherwise, if Israel levels Iran, the problem continues.

No one’s going to understand it right, at first:

If I was to write a book about my research, most publishers would want to title it: “Building a Case Against Christianity”; but, I would insist it be correctly titled: “Building a Case For Christianity.”

People tell me that the established (modern day) Christian moral concerning sexuality is “just the way it is, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it.” So, I’m an idiot for trying to correct it, right? But, my website is now filled with so much supportive evidence, that now people won’t be able to see the forest for the trees. I’m not kidding there. So, call me crazy, but I just worry more about what God would think of me if I didn’t report it. First step, one has to be smart enough to see something wrong or inconsistent with what’s taught / embedded. Then, two, they have to actually find true supportive evidence (that’s the main thing). Then three, they have to have the honesty, a strong Goldenrule, the pride in not worrying about what all the gold-diggers, pussywhipped men, religious leaders, and the average dumb person will think of me, and the time to be able to spend over ten years compiling, scanning and sorting the thousands of citings, to be able to stick in on the Net.

Today’s “Christian” teaching about sex and marriage is basically the total opposite of what Christ / God taught. No one today worships Christ / God: everyone just worships what today’s religious leaders say Christ and God are about. That’s why so many people today are turning into atheists. Now, I will look like a big dummy if there’s no God; but, I guess no one will really ever see that.

The Pope visits Czechoslovakia:

He urged the world to follow “the ethical principles of Christianity.” Close, but no cigar. The correct urging should say to follow “the Golden Rule.” You see, saying what the Pope said is not only “duh” information, but just allows today’s church to add or remove whatever they want to “ethical principles.” There are “reasons” why the world has so many preventable problems. And, no one but me has it totally figured out, and pithy. “Pithy” means if it doesn’t fit under the Goldenrule, then it’s talking about something else. The Catholic “ethical principles” are just about as bad as the Protestant church (the perfect Antichrist church). (In addition to being the most prominent in the huge sex / marriage lie), any confession, penance, atonement of any kind, are all cop-outs over Jesus’ set Judgment method in Matthew 5:21-26 (against sin); 25:31-46 (for good deeds). It makes sooooooooooooooo much sense to me why these cop-outs exist, and how they’re the root of everything from white lies to major wars; but, totally oblivious to you. So, I’ll just bootlick here and call you all “smart.” Now, does that make you all understand the error? Oh, Jesus said that making sufficient amends to the exact victim of your sin is the only way to avoid Fair Afterlife “Prison.” Therefore, by far, the best religious advice can only be, by far, never hurt an innocent person in the first place. What kind of world would it be if everyone was taught the logic of that? If they can believe the illogical cop-outs 100%, then how strong would they believe something that makes great sense? And, Jesus strongly stated that (after the Purgatory) the only way into the Kingdom of Heaven is by “doing” a sincere Goldenrule (during your life). Prevention of that would be an “everlasting punishment” (Matt. 25:46). So, there will be no second chance. I’m guessing it will be an eternal state of limbo, where recalled experiences is the only thing: no advancement; where the Kingdom of Heaven is new and progressive experiences, similar to pieces of the good life experiences here on earth. A growing thing versus a staying the same throughout eternity thing. Good for good. But, after all have passed thought the Logical Fairness of Suffering Equally for past “victimizing” sins against the innocent. (One could be in Purgatory for near eternity, if you were a warmonger who added innocent people to your even rightful revenge and/or safety.) The vast majority who are disallowed to enter the Kingdom of Heaven will be only what they are and know at the time of death, the pains of suffering equally for your sins in purgatory, and the equal pleasures commensurate with the good deeds you happen to accomplish during your lifetime. But, for more, you’ll be like a kid standing in from of an ice cream store, but never able to get to go inside (but, again, you’re be and know basically what you are and know right now); that’s reserved for the souls who deep down cared more for others / strangers over themselves. There’s logic why that has to be the criterion, as the Kingdom of Heaven would become corrupted and destroyed otherwise, as it is in the future here on earth and other places, within a fallible tangible universe, as God can’t make everything “perfect” or the universe would not exist.

Back to the above premise on cop-outs:

It’s not so much you all are so dumb, it’s that God is simply smart. And, again, you can preach the correct information 99% of the time; but, all is obliterated when you allow “one” cop-out. That, apparently, is the most difficult thing for people to understand, and that fact is the key reason why no one is able to oppose today’s churches. You see, a church called “The Devil” cannot do near as much world damage as a church that uses the name of the true righteousness of Jesus’ instructions, but adds “one” cop-out, because people have been taught to avoid “The Devil.” The whole issue is far too complicated for the human mind to understand the trick, on its own; therefore, only when the world gets a truly righteous teacher (only me) can things begin to get better. If anyone else existed to my level, I would have ran into it on the Internet by now.

Now, you “professional idiots” (idiots who get paid for being an idiot) can continue to think I’m “crazy.”

Now I have to sit closer to the TV to watch Fox News (then move back for other programs):

They started using “wide screen” TV, which really just makes things smaller. If / when you want to show us stuff that requires more peripheral extension, then just show it and leave the more picture at the top and bottom the rest of the time. I could be wrong, but I think the eyes focus best in a square (or, actually a circle). Sure, we have two eyes that spread out horizontally, but they both focus together to only one spot (otherwise, you’d get a double image); therefore really can’t see outside the “square” as well (we have to move our eyes to see it as good as within the square). But, since more is going on in the world to the left and right, than up and down, some compensation is in order. But realize, people who lived decades ago might not have really been that dumb just because they lived decades ago. I’ve seen many cases where likely the older true innovators retired, and the new “gifted” people took over, to just make things worse (again, there’s a big difference between a true innovator and someone “gifted” who just knows how to read and comprehend fast.) The world should spend more time trying to fix something that’s really broken. But, again, if there’s no intelligence available for such, then we’ll all have to convert again in the future, really just for the sake of “change” (fad).

Now I’m going to have to purchase some wheels for my chair.

If Obama decides to side with Israel:

Obama is like most everyone else: His decisions have always been, and still are, based on the majority of the influence surrounding him. He can’t think outside the box, and will change from his past “majority influence” to any new “majority influence.” And, of course, the wealthy is the influence one way or the other, when you’re President. (“Majority influence”: That also explains why Reagan ended up siding more for the poor, and why Clinton ended up siding against the poor.) So, all I ask is if Obama decides to side with Israel, he should be honest to the Muslims by saying that he thinks the Jews should be the ones who have control of the Holy Land instead of the Muslims; and, that therefore the Jews were justified in taking it by force, killing innocent Arabs. Now, don’t worry about additional problems, because the Muslims already knew this via Bush, etc.: it’ll just be that Americans will be able to better understand reality.

And, of course, Obama’s one of the good ones: those who can think outside the box, only deviate for what’s good for them personally.

Of course, people’s choice can only be either the “majority influence” and/or only what’s good for themselves, in a society that has no correct basis of right and wrong (which should be: never hurt an innocent person), and a cop-out church that lets them really do whatever they like. Oh sure, I’ve heard we’re not supposed to hurt innocent people (along with the church cop-outs overruling it), but the teaching needs to be that that’s the only violation that deserves punishment. Otherwise, everything else is pretty much open field.

Suicide bombers prove they’re more in the right:

It’s not so much done because it’s their best way to get their enemy, but because they have a much more ethical cause than we. A person who’s willing to sacrifice their life for certain, will have a much better ethical reason / fulfillment, then Americans who take a “chance” for the fulfillment of entertainment (most in our military strive / endure for the day that they get the pleasure of killing someone [right or wrong]. That’s the “kind” of pleasure people like me will never get to experience. Kings in the days of old had even more to offer, like the other side’s possessions and the allowed “fun” of rape.)

What’s the “craziest” think you can come up with, Mr. Critical?

If things go right, say in 200 years, junior high / middle school teachers will be advising struggling students to try having sex with more different appearances, in Goldenrule “having sex” class. Now, isn’t that crazier than words? That’s how powerfully reversed a peaceful Apocalypse can be. I know how outlandish and taboo that sounds, simply because I’ve been taught otherwise. Otherwise, I or anyone wouldn’t have a problem with it, if it was the accepted standard we were born in.

It may be closer than I’m thinkin’.

Deep thoughts:

Having monogamous sex with the same beautiful wife, is kind of like continually playing your favorite song and never listening to anything else.

The Afghanistan debacle:

When one has the correct answer to something, it can solve many problems. I say leave Afghanistan, leave Iraq, pay pertinent restitution, but mainly: move the Jews to WEST TEXAS. Then I just betcha we’ll get along with the Muslins much better. Tell the Jews that moving to West Texas is the way Christ would do it. Christ would rather “give” the Holy Land (museum) to the Muslims to idolatrize. But, it ain’t gonna happen simply because the Jews and the cop-out Christians are the most evil and unfair, compared to the evils and unfairnesses of the Muslims (and because the Jews don’t respect Jesus). In West Texas, the Jews could build the entire Herod’s Temple, naming it in honor of the many innocent children who were murdered for his pride; where the Most Holy of Holies could be called: “Leave you cop-out gifts here, so you don’t need to reconcile personally with the victim(s) of your sins.” Call it “Negative Mathew 5:21-26,” or “Negative Christ’s Real Judgment.” Or, stick a sign on it that says “Goldenrule,” and that will fix a whole lot of other problems (actually they have basically that displayed in Jerusalem, but, again, just “one” cop-out overrules it all).

I think if it was 1948 again, we would not be placing the Jews in Palestine. But, today, we can’t say we were wrong or unfair: ask O’Reilly. Pride and ego is 100% American: we must be able to eventually say “We won” or die trying. Well, actually, if O’Reilly or Hannity knew right now that they were going to be the next fatal victim because of the Israeli situation, they’d quickly offer West Texas as a solution. But, it won’t be them next to die: simply because it will be someone else who has to experience a torturous death; so, they’ll stick to their pride. Americans priority is hearing it the way we want to hear it. That’s why everyone still eats meat. The statistics that tell about how unhealthy meat is, must really be correct, knowing how many Americans don’t want to hear it. Really because meat is more expensive, therefore wins her favors better. Simply put, we’re never going to be able to solve this Israeli problem until we identify the real evil in this world first (O’Reilly, Hannity, etc.; because the Democrats simply don’t know anything.) (If the smarter people on Fox News all of a sudden became righteous, then that could really get some things done. But, I think things will stay stuck in this big catch-22 for a while.)

In this country, it’s like pretty easy for U.S. authorities to spy on a criminal, then arrest him when they want. The reason we can’t do that in Afghanistan is because we don’t have enough spies that looks the look and talks the talk to get in close to make an arrest or assassination. That’s because the Taliban has the people helping them. All they have to tell the people is about how this entire situation has to do with our one-sidedly support of the Israeli situation (snubbing the entire Muslim religion); which even overrules the burqa problem. So, it’s easy to stop a criminal in the United States because they simply don’t have right on their side; but, it’s very difficult to catch the Taliban because they have right on their side (from an honest person’s point of view), because of the Israeli unfairness. We (as a whole) aren’t even justified to complain about 9/11. Therefore, these kinds of problems will never end until we quit siding with the Israeli unfairness. Some laugh at how dumb Cheney and Rumsfeld were when they wholeheartedly thought that the Iraqis would greet us as liberators. But, I can laugh about how many today still think that these Muslims countries are going to fully side with us, while we keep the Jews ruling the Holy Land.

FOX SURE HAS AN AWFUL LOT OF COMMERCIALS DURING THE GLENN BECK SHOW!!!

That’s alright. Now I’ll be able to get some keen insight on a new product or service.

Deep thoughts:

I wonder how many women have asked their gynecologist to help them find their G-spot? Would O’Reilly disapprove? You bet he would. Especially when the government starts paying for it. Stimulation of the G-spot is supposed to give a much stronger orgasm than a mere clitoral orgasm. We should make this part of the medical plan in Afghanistan. That’s the way to fight them Tali-ban-her-sex-ers. Actually, there’s no logical reason why O’Reilly wouldn’t like the strict sexual morals over there.

I’ll telling you in advance, that Iran is not going to give in to any tougher economic sanctions:

They’d be fools to, as we have made it clear that we are their enemy, that we do wish their destructions (as shown in our aid of Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war), and are going to bully them until they day they die, all for the 1979 hostage situation (which we probably did something unfair to cause that. Possibly an injustice of their justice system. I know what the cops would do to me if I helped a felon escape). They’re apparently smart enough to know that unfair bullies are also the biggest cowards in the world; therefore, nuclear weapons are their only hope for a peaceful future. If we impose full economic sanctions, then that’s just going to guarantee an eventual nuclear war. And, if we start a war now, and take over the country, we’re definitely going to have insurgency problems that make Iraq and Afghanistan look like nothing, as the war will not only be based on the Israeli unfairness, but also the bullying unfairness that we are “allowed” to have nuclear weapons and they aren’t. And, whatever we did wrong in 1979 to cause them to take hostages. I’m one of the few Americans who doesn’t think they took the hostages just for the fun of it. And, I’m one of the few Americans who realize that saving face and never admitting error is American’s number one priority; and will be the base reason if war ends the world. Like I predicted, all I see Obama doing is turning into a Republican. I mean, people will believe a stupid pitch (look at “faith alone” in the Protestant church), so Hannity, etc. are apparently going to win. When someone spins an issue, that generally means they are leaving out a possible more relevant aspect. But, since few can think outside even that box, reiteration is all they need.

Prostitution spies “catching” ACORN is like catching 7-Eleven (convenience store chain):

If undercover prostitution spies told the clerk at 7-Eleven that they wish to purchase these several boxes of condoms for their imported under-age prostitutes. Well, if the clerk said: “Okay, that’ll be $??.??” instead of refusing to sell them the condoms, with a stern O’Reilly kind of opinion about how evil they are, then all 7-Eleven stores should be shut down! Right? There will be no mercy for that kind of despicable behavior on the O’Reilly Factor!

Moreover, what if the spies interrogated the clerk for his advice of how many boxes of condoms should they purchase for, say, seven girls, that usually work with about twelve different guys a day, for about eight hours a day, in one week; and, if he knew about how many times they can use the same condom with different men? Well, the clerk had better not have a knack for mathematics, or WHAMBO! O’Reilly will not even believe that this kind of stuff (helpful clerks) goes on in this country! Miller would agree.

I just regret that I don’t have spies constantly trying to trick me into admitting any kind of “verbal” support or apathy for crimes that shouldn’t be crimes; or, constantly trying to trick me into “saying” something wrong (where ignorance of the law is no excuse). … Wait a minute, I think I do have that. I’ve got to realize that Freedom of Speech goes against authorities: it’s a law – or the one law – that they don’t like. But, since the Patriot Act, they certainly can keep constant surveillance on someone who just practices what all our troops are supposedly dying for, with constant spy tricks, just waiting for it to work. This is allowed. And, they are so nice to me for waiting for me to “goof” instead of just shooting me. Oh, I have absolutely no right to complain (or razz them back a bit)! I should realize that they (supposedly) catch terrorists with the Patriot Act, while they ruin my life with the constant slander to my name with everyone they ask to help them with their surveillance and tricks. Apparently, there’s no way for the public to be able to tell the difference between real terrorist threats and people who just practice that one thing that all our troops die for in the battlefield. Is it more of an “evil” problem or more of a “dumb” problem? I know it’s both, but which is it more of? I think “dumb” wins again.

When authorities ask someone or a business, or another government agency, to help with some surveillance work they need to do against me, that’s slandering me, because they have absolutely no good reason to do so, other than my Freedom of Speech. It’s 100% spite, because the truth burns too much, and they just want to get me, to make them feel better. Otherwise, list your reasonings? I mean, there’s really no way for me to defend myself in this wonderful (not Nazi, not communism, non-dictator) country, when they don’t have a legitimate gripe; because, when someone doesn’t have a legitimate gripe, they’re not going to share it with me, because they’d know I’d easily refute it. But, it can sure continue to go on, and with whatever exaggerations they are surely adding – again, to make their non-debated endeavor look legitimately justified, which just slanders me even more. If I committed a crime, I could argue it in court; but, I don’t know of any law that prevents them for surveillance just for spite. Fair Afterlife Punishment is the only way. But, that’s not going to end the slander now, is it? Even my personal problems: It all comes down to a corrupt church that’s the real base reason. O’Reilly says that ACORN is “corrupt,” but if they’re corrupt, then they should be disciplined for being corrupt, not from some frivolous prostitution entrapment. Well, “entrapment” isn’t the correct word, as ACORN’s not agitating someone else’s “illegal” activity is really not a crime. I say we need to enforce the people who do the crimes, not who sucker into a trick that would probably never mimic actual reality incidents (no one is likely to tell about their illegal activity to strangers). I’d have told the spy to just tell the IRS that you won it in Las Vegas, just because I’m smart enough to know that’d work (I think). I’m definitely not going to make an enemy with some crime boss who knows where I work all day.

Sooner than later:

I recommend Obama just do what he wants, and quit letting Fox News control you, and henceforth the people. You got elected on a liberal plan. And, I think the best thing is to implement an all government health care, denial of Israel, etc.: the sooner the better, so the benefits of all can prove itself and become recognized before the next election, instead of wasting all this time trying to please Sean Hannity and all those others with money, leading to a failure situation. Denying Israel (offering West Texas, otherwise they’re on their own militarily) along with ending hostilities in these Muslim countries should bring an increase in peace with Muslims, that should help you in the next election with a bit of logic. But, if you decide to do it like one year before the next election, then there might not be enough time for the benefits to be seen. Realize you’re now surrounded by the bigger money people, than you were in Chicago. But, try to remember what you would have done when you were in Chicago.

Luke 6:20:

“Blessed are you poor, for yours is the kingdom of God”

Luke 6:24:

“But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation.”

And, Hannity talks about how he supports God? This just tells that exists a major brainwash in today’s church.

I heard that “welfare rights” was the motive for ACORN:

Oh, I see now why Fox News wants them stopped: because they’re advocates for the poor and needy. Well then, my Lewis and Clark research is, by far, the best support for ACORN. If I (my writings) ever become popular, I will think I’m lacking somewhere if I don’t become Fox News’ biggest enemy. Such would probably even give Obama relief. And, congress was suckered into dropping ACORN’s funding, just for the prostitution entrapment sting? What a bunch of mindless idiots. Again, the stereotype fits: they’re all just top quality talk and super personalities: no ability to think outside the box. Sounds like they can’t even read between the lines.

Lewis and Clark reported an abundance of free food, in the Kansas City area, unlike “civilized” areas to the east:

When I go down to the welfare office, they’ll treat me like they’re giving me something that I should be working for to obtain. Why should I have to pay for my food, when God’s free food was taken and destroyed for others’ success? Shouldn’t those who profited be the ones paying for my food? And, how many big sturdy Daniel Boone type of houses could I have built on my own by now, if I was able to utilize all of God’s free building materials – which isn’t free anymore – since I’ve been born? Huh?

You know they have special classes in high school for “gifted” students:

I just want to know, if any of them are smart enough to be able to reckon out that guys like Hannity and all other Americans who think it’s fair to be unfair to foreigners, particularly in how the Jews should be in charge of the Holy Land cop-out instead of the Muslims; and, that those types are the ones who really caused 9/11; and, are much more guilty and in need of correction than even Osama bin Ladin? And, because Hannity and his types are still out there influencing big as ever, I personally want them out of this country; because, they will eventually cause another attack against us, where I could fall victim. They’ll all cliché that if “I” don’t like it here in the United States, and how unfair we are to foreign interests, then “I” should be the one to leave. But, me and whoever is smart enough to know who the real root killers of Americans are, should not have to be the ones having to leave, simply because we’re not the ones who are evil and biasly unfair. But, I don’t think Fox News or anyone in control is going to change, because no “gifted” person is able to reckon that far. In other words, Obama needs to “realize” that he fights terrorism against this country much better if he can get rid of people like Hannity, than killing anyone in Afghanistan. I mean, Obama will allow murders of people who are just fighting our obvious genocide against the Taliban, instead of the much worse evil probably sitting right next to him. Again, all we’re doing is the same thing Hilter did against the Jews. Hitler was obviously determined to not give any safe havens for Jews, who had to have somehow presented themselves as the enemy. The atrocities of Hitler finally came to an end; and, so will America if we keep pleasing people like Hannity. (1) We aren’t going to explain how the Holy Land is just a museum, not a cop-out to overrule the (much harder to achieve) Goldenrule; so, (2) we should just quit killing foreign people, even the ones who think just like patriotic Hannity (but are just on the other side). In other words, you don’t have to try to understand anything about the true basis of right and wrong; nor do you have to try to understand about what’s really going on. “Just” do as I say! Again, “gifted” people only impress because they can “learn” existing / accepted information quicker. If it’s bad information, we can say that they are very gullible and much easier to brainwash, because they simply read and retain that false information much faster and “comprehend” it into acceptance much better, than the normal person. So, the catch-22 is that all the things I can reckon out can’t be understood by “gifted” people unless or until the “gifted” people are taught it from a society accepted source. Obama’s the best example, as he slowly adjusts to the overwhelming “teaching” (majority influence) of the conservatives. In other words, when one has a high aptitude for learning, comprehending and thinking very well inside the box, lack in the ability to think outside the box, as the two do logically conflict.

True, many over there are going to want revenge for our atrocities against them; but, again, we’re only going to make “more” ememies and increase their plans against us, the more people we kill over there (as the root basis is still Israel), unless we are able to accomplish like what Hitler tried to do against all the Jews. Since “gifted” people aren’t “taught” it, we’re going to somehow have to realize that the Muslims aren’t going to ever just wake up some morning and “realize” that the Jews should be in charge of the Holy Land cop-out instead of the Muslims. Unless, we can somehow explain the cop-out significance of it all. And, the church definitely is not going to give into to that, and the media (probably mostly gifted people) are too stupid to even understand it.

Of course, some could argue that I’m the stupid one thinking that all the “gifted” people in this country are ever going to think that they lack in any kind of intelligence. And, that would be correct, because once I’m dead and gone, none of them are going to be able to reckon these kinds of things out to solve future problems.

People like Carl Cameron, Major Garrett, Geraldo Rivera, etc. who can absorb existing information at the scene, sense well between the lines, then clarify it all in top quality paraphrase for viewers, are great examples of gifted people who do very well at “thinking within the box.” However, these struggle in thinking outside the box, where apparently I excel. And, I could not do what they can do, in such impressive quality.

You can learn lots from a “gifted” student:

Let me tell you something important about family and values: You stick up for your family, right or wrong!

Let me tell you something about the honor of being patriotic: You stick up for your country, right or wrong!

Let me tell you something important about the Western Wall: You stick up for Israel, right or wrong!

Now, the thing the gifted people forget to tell you is that you hope the other side in all these disputes doesn’t honor the same thing, or even only when they’re in the right.

Hey O’Reilly:

It’s been a long time since I’ve heard you tell us to not be a “jackanape” when righting you. Does that mean it’s now okay for me to right you?

In an open/free sex world, there will simply be less “lust”:

When everyone is satisfied with the diversity of sexual partners, no one will “crave intensely” like today’s people who are sexually depraved. No one will desire to rape someone, or become violent when she breaks up with you, etc.

The new Michael Moore movie: Capitalism: A Love Story:

Not much for me to say as those particular types of corruptions and unfairnesses are being addressed there. Other than that the Capitalism system isn’t the cause, because you can have much worse corruption and unfairness in a communist or Nazi society. More honest and intelligent regulations should simply solve most of what Michael addressed. (Well, simple for me to probably figure out, not for others; so?) Hypothetically, Obama can get all corruption and unfairness out of the government and big business by the end of his roll; but, only a fear of God will stop it from reoccurring again 20-30 years from now. So, as usual, a strong religious Goldenrule teaching, which requires the ridding of all cop-outs, is the only long range / ultimate solution. And, that definitely includes the Holy Land cop-out. I sure like the way Michael quotes the Bible. If the big corporations get in the way of progress, then read ‘em the Bible, where you’d have to mention that they’ve only heard cop-outs in churches. Not saying all this correctly, isn’t going to work for the long run, or even probably the short run.

10-6-09:

When Michael Moore and Hannity discussed where Jesus said that the rich have little chance of receiving salvation, had to have put the fear of God in more of his watchers than at any other time in the history of the show (for the better). I think Hannity fell for it as his priority was to display Michael as a hypocrite – that Michael would be included in said category. But, when one devotes the majority of his time to the aid of the poor and needy, I think they’re covered, and in the only possible way for the rich. Otherwise, if Michael didn’t have the money to devote to helping the poor, it simply wouldn’t get done, as real poor people don’t have a voice unless a rich person gives it to them. So, kudos to the rich who follows the real Jesus. Michael can be a “hypocrite” all he wants; because otherwise, if he was poor, he wouldn’t be able to accomplish diddly. I think he accomplished more with the Jesus quotes on just that one Hannity show to justify billions of dollars for himself.

A specific solution to the problems addressed in Michael’s movie:

I think the solution to unfairness in the justice system and big business has to do with how Americans define lying. Here’s the real definition:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lie, “lie”:

1.	a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.

2.	something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one.

If legislators and judges possessed the intelligence to know what “convey[s] a false impression,” then fine print contracts (e.g., priority information, like increase in mortgage interest clauses should be at top in bold letters); limiting pertinent information like hidden fees; no flaw warnings; and anything that’s textually true, but is really said with intent to “convey” something else – used extensively in advertising by just leaving out certain truths, or ambiguous language – could solve A LOT of problems within the Free Enterprise system. I think legislators and judges can only read if something is of direct textual truth, rather than using their more difficult ability to read between the lines to see the hidden indirect “false impression”; which is a human knack instead of what a programmed machine could accomplish.

I hear individuals all the time using these “false impression” tactics; therefore, it has become very accepted in American society. So, the truth about what is truth, is something that should be correctly taught in a future Goldenrule school. I know that there are some statutes that state this kind of thing, but it is apparently overwhelmingly ignored (when, again, there’s “a” valid textual truth), or based depending on the favoritism of “who” did what to “who.” So, I’m saying it needs to be stressed more. Lots of Americans even define a lie as a “mistake”; to euphemize the evil. One has to be pretty dumb to not understand those kinds of people. Yeah, buddy, the “mistake” is you being here in this world.

Speaking of the Devil: The Invention of Lying (movie):

What if the real world always told the truth like that? Fox News would be saying: “The war in Afghanistan continued today with assaults on both sides killing dozens of civilians. Of course, Fox News viewers feel justified in our killing of any Afghan or Iraqi civilian because of the innocent Americans who died on 9/11. They are aware that those are not the individuals who conspired against the United States, but they still receive a good feeling of revenge down deep regardless. They also enjoy not hearing how the U.S.’s support of Israel’s violent intrusion into Palestine was the cause of 9/11, according to bin Laden. Rather they just support Israel’s belief that living and/or praying in the Holy City will make God do nicer things for them; knowing how difficult it is sometimes to ‘do’ God’s mandatory instruction of the Goldenrule.” “The President today is submitting his new health reform bill to Congress. Most Fox News viewers don’t like the proposal because the wealthy are stingy and would rather monopolize the doctors just for themselves. They figure that if the poor get to see doctors, doctors will have less time for the rich. Proponents of the plan say that rich people monopolizing all the doctors is like cutting in line at the cafeteria or ticket office; but, rich people say that since no one ‘sees’ their unfair precedential advantage, then they don’t feel so disgraceful; which causes them to believe that God won’t Judge them as disgraceful in the Afterlife.”

Then I seen me another movie:

Yeah, I tell ya’, the way I got it figured, most Americans would agree that the terrorists and insurgents are nothin’ but “Inglourious Basterds!” Right? So, just change the Germans to Americans; and the Jews to the Taliban, and I think I’ve got it – religiously speaking of course. And, I know that any good Apache would say that the only good Taliban is a dead Taliban! Agreed? Now, I’m not from the Great Smokey Mountains of Iraq or Afghanistan, but I reckon “the shoe is on the other foot.” (That’s an “expression.”) What do you think about that, Adolf… I mean Barack B. Bush? Comprendere? Hope I don’t get chewed out just for sayin’ this. Now, I don’t have all the smarts of a military colonel, especially one who’s the best at hunting down them Tallerbanders, but I reckon fighting the root of the fire with gasoline (or, some correctly placed commands) in the theatre of Israel would cause the end of the entire war, so I can feel safer from terrorism and/or eventual nuclear war, living closer to Russia on the outskirts of this moral country in beautiful downtown Nantucket. Now, I want to know: would you say “that’s a bingo,” or just “bingo”? I might not be able to say “I won,” but I can say “bingo!” But, what’s more important: sayin’ “that’s a win” or… “bingo!”? So, please, someone, send me some films detailing the biggest successes we’re having in Afghanistan, will ya’? And, I want my films; because, I don’t reckon I’m-a ever gonna see it on Fox News. Somehow I don’t figure I’m gettin’ the Metal of Honor for my inglourious suggestion, and a-pointin’ to the right place on the map (Israel); but, all I can say is: Try to quit shooting yourself in the foot, since the shoe fits, while firing your machine gun through the floor.

President, sir! You’ve been askin’ way too many questions, and you ain’t gittin’ it. The card on your forehead says “West Texas.” That-a-way, you’ll be givin’ them Jews their “safe haven” which apparently Adolf Hitler refused to do. And, the Jews should want their safe haven, so we won’t have to keep killing and killing through eternity to lessen them al-Quada safe havens, though quite more entertaining if you could do it with the ball bat. So, just give them Afghan civilians a choice: It’s either beaten to death with a bat, or burned alive with the scatter bomb. (I bet most would take the bat.)

Okay Mr. Critical, forget the civilians; now say something for the defenseless animals:

As many of you know, Mr. Critical doesn’t spend enough time on the powerful characteristics of fecal matter. (No, I’m not talking about Republicans.) Many websites, blogs, and even more popular in verbal communication, will cite the issue via the “s” word, but limit their findings after they’ve cooled off. This article will now analyze the sensory attributes of flatulopetic art. From the elevator to the bedroom asleep with the beautiful wife, flatus has always quickly changed the mind’s attention deterring human’s vast advancement of progressive thought:

To explain it in its most elementary of elucidations, I purchased this book at the mall:

The Gas We Pass: The Story of Farts, Shinta Cho, 1994, (no page numbers):

“The book tells children about flatulence (also known as farting)”

“The book is part of the My Body Science series of books.”

“Reading level: Baby-Preschool.” So hopefully some of you may understand it.

…

I don’t know, but if I was one of them smart humans, I wouldn’t want all those toxins in my colon. (Unless I was a Republican.)

Mr. Critical – Just raisin’ some stink.

TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/