Subject: War is heck!
So, I’ve decided to stay away from all the heck, and not go to Iraq this year for vacation; and keep my mind in the 1950s, to better coordinate with O’Reilly and Hannity. I’m probably now anti-heck because I couldn’t say it to express it, but I could watch it back when The Duke and Vic Morrow were kicking heck out of the Germans. Roman soldiers probably didn’t know what the heck they were marching to, because, heck, they didn’t have television to pre-warn them. I bet all the subjects in my first 03-21-06 email said heck a few times. Now, we all just want to know if the surge for more heck is working or not. I wish I could find another atheist to tell to go to Heck; but, I know, I know, they don’t believe in any kind of Heck. If everyone’s favorite Marine back in the sixties had went to Vietnam, surely he would have said Shezam! and Gol-ly!, because he knew some future relative would find a way to make up for it – by giving them Christians a lotta heck! Just tell ‘em next time to be careful though, when giving heck to certain (talented) Christians, or they might actually hear voices from the Spirit World saying Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! when they revisit a certain website. I guess sometimes one needs discussion from a dumb-bell to help Let Freedom Ring!
October 3, 2007
I say, I say, you atheists just show you’re a slow jumbo dumbo, when you woe what I know as mumbo jumbo.
Okay, you all got your seat belts on?:
The best rationale against war:
Anyone who thinks America is justified in killing an innocent person in war, when we must or definitely be killed ourselves, is the same as holding up Jessica Lunsford in from of them to block the bullets of someone trying to kill them. Therefore, in TRUTHFUL FAIR LOGIC, anyone who supports any kind of war, where innocent people will be killed by the effort, are murderous cowards – JUST LIKE JOHN COUEY! And will suffer equally in their afterlives. So, there IS a BIG surprise waiting for the vast majority after they die. I don’t see how you can all live with yourselves. “Dumb” is only reason you can.
Fox News covers up a lot of stuff:
And/or spins it in partiality. (Tell us something we don’t already know, Mr. Critical.) Okay: That means they are “lying” to their conservative viewers. (Oh!) Shouldn’t Fox News’ conservative viewers be offended by that? (I guess so.) I mean, does any conservative viewer say they wish Fox News to report to them dishonestly and/or biasly? (….) Then why do conservatives like Fox News so much? (???.) “Dumb” is first-base in finding solutions. (!!!.)
Slugwash! One major lie in the news in apparently Ahmadinejad’s denial of the Jewish Holocaust. He said at Columbia University that he acknowledged that the persecution occurred, he just stated he wanted to research “why”? At least that’s what I got from the interpreter. If such is the case, then our news leaders telling he denies the Holocaust is saying he is saying the persecution didn’t happen, in the modern English translation. (Which was hard for me to believe in the first place). That is a major lie to the American people, and shows who the real instigators are of unnecessary war: our media. If such is the case, our wishes to suppress his research tells that there must be something good being hidden. Which is also a hypocrite’s insult to the word Freedom. It does make sense, that the worst evil would be those who talk the biggest about Freedom, being the ones who wish to suppress it the most (like all the protestors wishing to suppress his speech at Columbia University). Ironically, those actually believe that God supports their lies. Again, my website is the ONLY solution in this world against those kind of lies. I mean, there’s lots of websites talking about specific lies and atrocities, but mine is the ONLY root solution, addressing the things that must first be accomplished before all the evils can be stopped in the future. I’ve spent a lot of time searching my kind of issues on the Internet and in books, and haven’t found anything close to the brief listing of my five Important Master Statements at my site. So, simply put, the world is NEVER going to start getting better until my website is disseminated. Just realize, before 1998, my brief overall solutions were no where to be found. Now it’s just a few hyperlinks away.
Bootleticks, I’ve never heard any rational reason why Hitler killed the Jews, so me and probably every conservative viewer out there would like to “know” the (real) reason why. But, regardless, I don’t see how it has anything to do with what’s going on today. I mean, the Holocaust has absolutely no justification for Jews to be unfair to Palestinians, because we could move them all to West Texas. Oh well, to not over confuse myself with guesses, I’ll just lean to believe that America has a very slanted and suppressive media, who are all too dumb to realize it. And, oh yeah, it’s probably the same way in the rest of the world also.
Battlecramps! You see, Columbia University believes America’s lies so much that they thought that they’d bring Ahmadinejad directly to their forum so to bring him down, in front of the whole country; but, all they did is allow his truths to be disseminated to the American people. The only thing that me and everyone else seems to be able to correctly criticize is his country’s hatred against gays. And that’s solely a religious issue, and I’m the only person I know who has properly refuted that issue. When the church corrupts the Biblical words against homosexuals, then everyone “just” believes them, even if they’re gay. For example, if you dig a little, you will find that the original Hebrew in Leviticus 18:22; 20:13 was talking about a man having sex with a male child / offspring (pederasty):
The Interlinear Bible: Hebrew-Greek-English,1986, Part 1: Old Testament: Hebrew/Engish, p. 105, Leviticus 20:13:
(You read Hebrew from right to left, then down):
–You see, it’s a different word.
Hebrew # 2145:זָכָר or זכר (characters: Resh, Kaf, Zayin; with two vowel points: Qamats [A]) (transliteration: R [A] K or KH [A] Z), “zakhar” “zakar” “zaw-kawr” (Hebrew pronunciations are arbitrary).
Wilson’s Old Testament Word Studies, 1990, p. 265, “Male”:
Here’s actually the Hebrew word with the word “bed”(#4904 above) added:
Webster’s New World Hebrew Dictionary, Hayim Baltsan, 1992, (transliterated) Hebrew-English, p. 258, “meeshkav”:
Pp. 459-460, “(meeshkav) zakhar”:
Mounce’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old & New Testament Words, 2006, pp. 434-435, “Male | Old Testament”:
You see, that’s the only correct way to fight them lying Christians. Not with profanity. You might look really cool to atheists, and to Ted Nugent, but to (intelligent) Christians, you’re just going to look like a big dumb-bell.
It’s the same in the Greek New Testament: 1 Tim. 1:10 & 1 Cor. 6:9 (which is also the word used in the Septuagint for the above):
Interlinear Greek-English New Testament, Green, 1996, p. 638, 1 Timothy 1:10:
Langenscheidt’s Pocket Greek Dictionary: Classical Greek-English, p. 63:
ΝΕΟΝ ΟΡΘΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΟΝ ΕΡΜΗΝΕΥΤΙΚΟΝ ΛΕΞΙΚΟΝ (NEW ORTHOGRAPHIC EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY) (this is a monolingual Greek dictionary, a 3” thick abridgment of a large 9 volume dictionary), by Δ. ΔΗΜΗΤΡΑΚΟΥ, 1969, p. 231:
(AN means the definition is from ancient Greek[A] to modern Greek[N]):
Well:
http://babelfish.altavista.com/ (translator), Greek to English, “παιδεραστής”:
pedophile
http://www.answers.com/pedophile, “pedophile”:
An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.
Warren Jeffs:
The Freedom of Religion people oughta take-off on this. If one of the jurors was against the charges, then that’s supposed to be a “hung jury” therefore, Jeffs walks, or they have to retry the case (which degrades the prosecution’s case, a lot), if I know my laws. Unless, he’s on trial in a country that violates its own laws – laws that say Jeffs violated “statutory” rape. Again, a court that violates statute, by changing a juror that’s not voting to what they want, is a no-no. I mean, it worries me living in such a corrupt country. Really! It should worry everyone. Now, “statutorily,” Jeffs should only be charged with conducting an illegal marriage (maybe); which are laws based on violations of Freedom of Religion. Which should equate to like a traffic violation, not life in prison. As a religious figure, hypothetically, I feel I could tell 14-year-old girls to go out and have sex, outside of marriage even, and be protected by the First Amendment. Just cause one follows my belief, doesn’t mean I should go to prison the rest of my life, unless, of course, Adolf Hitler or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (maybe) is in charge. ANY parent that “intelligently” furnishes birth control and disease preventives, instead of abstinence only, to their 14-year-olds are affirming the same thing! Therefore, if Jeffs deserves a life sentence, then a great number of “wise” parents deserve the same. I’ve known a few women who had to raise a grandchild because they didn’t furnish birth control to their young adolescent daughter.—They had probably listened to James Dobson, or someone. The Jeffs’ “victim” who hated the sex was also obviously a victim of mainstream societal brainwash, since most people enjoy the act of sex, duh. I think the “age of reason” is 7 or 8 isn’t it? Therefore, the girl could have said “no.” But, I’m not hearing about any valid (adamant) “no” violations, which would be rape (that’s “no” right before or during the sex)(real “no” usually is accompanied by some kind of force or resistance against it, right before or during the sex …, duh!). The girl was never forced to have sex – just talked into it, via First Amendment Freedom of Religion and Speech. I thing we might as well have had Hitler in charge, really! We’d have saved a lot of American soldiers’ lives, just to have the same corruption that we have today. Like many others, I don’t personally agree with Jeffs’ teachings; but, I most more importantly respect and demand respect for his all important Freedom to Believe and Speak the same! Fox News apparently doesn’t. O’Reilly really doesn’t. O’Reilly only cares about unfair statutes, and then supports the violation of statute to his selfish and ignorant wishes. It’s really sickening. I think Jeffs thought he wasn’t violating any laws that haven’t been overlooked for decades (polygamy). So there’s probably no “intent” to violate enforced laws – no where close to “life” in prison. Or, we should all get traffic tickets for driving five over the speed limit. When individual courts make up, determine or define laws and definitions, they are giving the “violator” no way to predetermine a violation. If Jeffs stays in jail / prison, then that just helps me prove that we don’t have the slightest idea of what is right and what is wrong. Which therefore begs for my intellect even more.
The world according to most Americans:
I’m not smart enough to understand:
… the difference between our Mexican border wall, and the Berlin wall. Oh, I see… one restricts people from getting in, and the other restricts people from getting out. Well, I’ve got it now: “restricts” means “Freedom.” Why can’t O’Reilly explain it that way?
To be or not to be pithy – that is the question:
I remember when my 04-14-06 email letter got a return from someone’s Content Protection (Parental Control) Filter, because I was (importantly) commenting about something relating to what Bill Clinton got from Monica Lewinski. It was two words, and had something to do with what a person has to do to inflate a balloon using the non-mechanical air method, and where most people drive to in the morning. Because I do have to be careful to be able to be honest about my future META data asserting a “rating” value of GENERAL, because I know, and most of you know, that my stuff is either “educational context” or “news context,” but the search engine bots don’t know that. So the next time I find it important and necessary for the benefit of politics, justice, and the entire country / world, to express in brief and normal terminology – instead, I’m just going to have to say “No one missed any meals because Bill Clinton got a what a person has to do to inflate a balloon using the non-mechanical air method, and where most people drive to in the morning in the White House.” So good, I hope everybody is happy.
National Health Care:
Probably the best thing would be a Nationally Paid Health Care, but subsidized by a much smaller fee for medical care / treatment. That small fee would probably discourage people who go the doctor for everything, which is probably the cause of the long lines in Canada, etc. Then it’d be like when Directory Assistance started charging. If Canada implemented an additional nominal charge for health care, maybe lots of people wouldn’t be in the way of the more important health concerns. Of course, discouraging people to seek medical attention for preventive medicine, etc. may not be too good either, so we just need to find the proper medium.
The difference between Fox News and other news media:
In summary, Fox News strongly sides with the few, but the very powerful few. Other news media also sides with the same few, but likes to tinker around with stuff that’s for the majority. The majority of voters seem to be oblivious to all this. “Brainwash”: it’s still the principal boss, in a country where many have died in the battlefield so those majority can have the final say.
According to the Family Online Safety Institute:
…at (http://www.icra.org/vocabulary/), under the category of “violence,” tells that recommended filtered material includes: “Injury to animals”; “Blood and dismemberment, animals”; “Torture or killing of animals.” So… what’s on your dinner plate? Or, maybe even YOUR KID’S dinner plate, huh? I guess if one doctors it up with stuff from the vegetable kingdom, that makes it right. “Dumb”: it’s the world we live in.
Introducing Idiot-Off!:
–Apply directly to the forehead.
Mary Winkler got off because she has sexual appeal:
That pretty well explains it. What if everyone had sexual appeal (via a fad for bisexual looks diversity)? Would we be kinder to others overall? But, hopefully not to the Mary Winkler example extreme. Because, that’s sexual “lust.”
Mr. Critical – The real knowledge is not in college.
TO SEE PRIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/
Note: The above web link is to a new permanent domain. Please, change any prior links you’ve established: I don’t know how long I will be able to maintain the forwardings I’ve set up. Thank you.