Subject:  “Democrats have just listened to too much Twisted Sister”

 

That’s the latest assumption on the Republican front.

 

9-20-09

 

Why women don’t like sex as much:

It’s kind of like how a musician likes playing his tunes for people, but will become unenthused when he knows he’s not going to be making any money for it.  If he was sufficiently paid for his time from another source, but not from selling CDs or performing concerts, then he’d more enjoy playing for no additional money, just for the cheers.  Women will enjoy the human touch much more when their minds aren’t trapped into the (Church placed) notion that it’s her leverage to get things from men.  Most will masturbate into Heaven, but shun the human touch additive until her other needs are covered (today, mostly just the pride of control over a man).

 

The masturbation logic doesn’t hold water, as it feels better when a man is doing the same to her (hitting the right spots, or just holding the vibrator) then when she has to do it herself.  She can better rise toward heaven when she doesn’t have to exert work, and can just lay there.

 

Today, most “easy” women like sex with men, just because they get off on being “evil” (against the church, and/or society).  Still, it’s a back and forth vacillation where the predominant society / church taught “do be a prostitute but don’t be an honest prostitute” will usually always end up winning (as “easy” is just a short-lived phase).  Lots of women today can better more enjoy the touch of another woman, as they are free from the pressure to control, abuse, or the shame of giving it away free for a greedy male.  The “mutual” pleasure (between a man and a woman) is much more difficult to find in this still strong “prostitute” based society; because, the New Testament predominately condemns sex for money/obligations (via “porneia”), yet the church forces marriage in an organized “accepted” form of prostitution / obligations, and no one’s mind appears to be able to correctly overrule this obvious correlation except me.  The vast “power” of the past and present church causes all to either conform (worry about what others will think) or defy the church and/or society; which usually always also defies the all important Goldenrule.  One extreme or the other.  (Today’s women have premarital sex with just one man just because it’s society-accepted, thanks to the pill, and many times church overlooked; but, the base prostitution ideal is the real evil that still strongly remains; which both me and the Bible says needs to be fixed.)

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1211624/Why-women-sex-To-relieve-boredom-win-favours-stop-headache.html, Why women have sex:

“But most have selfish motives, with financial or material rewards a major factor behind many sexual encounters.”

 

In the future, sex variety of partners can become the greatest desire, as there is a medical benefit in sharing a variety of small amounts of germs (once we get harsh diseases under control).  It’d basically be the opposite of when we think is moral today.

 

“Required”?:

“And unless everybody does their part, many of the insurance reforms we seek, especially requiring insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions, just can't be achieved [as I informed in my 8-5-09 & 9-1-09 emails].  That's why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance -- just as most states require you to carry auto insurance.” –Barack Obama, Speech to Congress, 9-9-09.  I don’t understand how he’s going to “require[]” people to pay for health insurance.  How will we know when someone doesn’t pay, until they need it?  Is there going to be a penalty when they show up at the hospital or something?  If so, isn’t that just making things worse for the poor?  It’s not like auto insurance, as a driver is in trouble when he gets pulled over without insurance for good reason, and driving a car is not a “require[ment].”  “… businesses will be required to either offer their workers health care, or chip in to help cover the cost of their workers.”  The employee still might not pay for it… knowing how he’s covered for pre-existing conditions when he does get sick.  Why shouldn’t the employee wait until then?  Unless the President is just fibbing us all with particulars that aren’t going to work, just to get a start for a final all government program, then I don’t think it’s going to work.  That is, I think everyone will be able to quickly figure out that none of them need to pay for the government’s guarantee of health care.  Then it will simply be the government paying for it all.  Oh sure, you can keep paying your hard earned money for high insurance premiums if you want, or you can get the same and not pay anything as the government will pay it if you don’t.  President Obama, admit failure in your health care ideas (sooner than later to lessen the hurt), or do what I say.  And, make it available for illegal immigrants, or you “will go away into everlasting punishment,” according to “Jesus” in Matthew 25:32-46.

 

Another advantage for an all government paid health system: it will be able to better check against doctors who are now able to charge different insurance companies for any fraudulent excess time worked.  Today, there’s no way to check for like twelve hours worth of billing for an eight hour work day:  When like four different insurance companies each get billed for four hours of time, for an eight hour day, there’s no cross checking that can alert for any overcharging.  It’s like, hypothetically, if a factory worker could report his hours worked to like four non-associated payroll agencies, how many do you think will overlap their hours?  I know that you think higher educated people somehow have been taught to know not to cheat; but, something is going on in the higher educated community or rates would not be continually skyrocketing.  I mean, do Americas somehow acquire double the number of doctors per person, every time rates double?

 

You see, the a government health care program wouldn’t discriminate against pre-existing conditions.  Quit trying to please O’Reilly and Hannity, just do the all government plan.  You know, there are areas in this country where white people shouldn’t go, and there are areas where black people shouldn’t go.  The areas where black people shouldn’t go are where the main supporters of Hannity and O’Reilly are.

 

Why are doctors complaining:

Under an all government plan, doctors will have direct access to the latest technology if the government oversaw it all.  And, why should they complain about billing the government instead of insurance companies if they don’t have something to hide?  Huh?

 

Fox thinks ACORN executives deserve a kick in the acorns:

I didn’t know ACORN was the police.  I thought ACORN was just supposed to just help set up housing, etc.  What if the ACORN employee is like lots of Americans who think prostitution should be legalized?  I guess I’m evil for not doing everything I can to help the police bust up prostitution rings.  Yep, if I’m ever at a party and someone tells me how they visit prostitutes, I’d better squeal to police or be the worst.  If someone admits prostitution to a priest, his job is to advise, then keep his mouth shut to others.  Why doesn’t O’Reilly tell priests that “It doesn’t get much worse than that”? – (see O’Reilly’s Talking Points for 9-15-09).  If marriage and conditional sex wasn’t such a standard in this world, I’d think there’d be a victim in prostitution.  But, when both parties are consensual, I can’t really find a victim.  In fact, honest prostitution has to be lots less victimizing, because dishonest prostitution (marriage, etc.) can even take a man’s “soul” according to Revelation 18:13.  Many of us can testify to that.  You see, a quick deal of sex for money can’t devastate a man’s entire life.  The damage of the “lust” factor is minimized.  Same with the prostitute when she’s open-minded.  Yeah, murder, stealing, etc. is bad; but, O’Reilly is mostly going to use his vast influence to fight the victimless stuff.  Why?  You see, I’m right when I tell that few really know right from wrong: Never hurt an “innocent” person.  The age of reason is around seven years old, therefore anyone past puberty should be allowed to make their own decisions about sex, and has the ability to decide just as much as an adult.  Why we have statutory laws is simply because it’s the anti-sex people’s last stronghold, who also happen to be the one’s who actually desire to lessen sex education to our youth, which can end up being the reason why an adolescent could be wrong with their sexual decisions.  No, it’s not just because of STDs (which is the only real concern):  If there were cures for all STDs, anti-sex people would still say adolescents can’t decide for themselves.  It’s today’s evil church that’s the base of all the problems; which I appear to be one of the very few who are trying to fight it; and probably the only one fighting it correctly with Jesus’ words.

 

Someone of influence needs to realize that the ones who grandstand the most about victimless crimes are the real enemy of the U.S. – worse than alQaeda!

 

I think the O’Reilly “It doesn’t get much worse than that” ACORN employee example is “just agreeing” with the clients as a common courtesy, and she may very well not actually morally agree, and are not required to police extending situations.  A “squealing” to the police of a real organization that brings in foreign prostitute workers would be the kind of “mafia” that most people would not want to cross; especially, when they would likely know who squealed and where they can be located.

 

Hannity showed an “exclusive” ACORN clip where the male employee inquired about the personal use of the undercover prostitute.  I bet half the adult males in this country would want to take advantage of that.  So, what are we really policing?  Next time, Hannity, set up a sting where say a very attractive, well hung, 15-year-old seriously propositions any adult male, in any profession, in an apparent private valid offer.  Then Fox News will have accomplished putting probably well over half the adult males in this country in prison.  In other words, it’s easy to find “criminals” when there are laws that shouldn’t be laws; especially one (sex for money) that is a major religious corruption allowed in all other aspects of its reality, by the church and the corrupt mindless society we live in.  Oh, I know Muslims are worse:  Just barely worse that Fox News though.

 

(Honest) prostitution is illegal in this country because lawmakers had better know to vote against it, or risk losing their beautiful wife.  This simply is another identification of the ills of “lust” (sexually desiring the more attractive).  Plus, this really shows how “dishonest” prostitution (marriage, women controlling men, etc.) is the major competition factor fighting “honest” prostitution (quick, sufficient, terminating deals).  It’s just one type fighting the other type.  It’s the “evil” type fighting the “honest” type.  Like the strong greed selfishness of the typical conservative, the taught/allowed high greed of women, even just for the game, is the cause.  Of course, you all are too “educated” to understand this.

 

By the way, a sufficient degree of “greed” is good:  There’s nothing wrong with wanting the best for yourself, and striving for more.  It can motivate and enthuse many to make better things.  There’s just a “line” there called the Goldenrule that Jesus states cannot be crossed.  Today, there’s a fad or custom or pride to show others how much better you are than them.  Change the fad, custom or pride to the opposite: impressing others with your generosity.  It will actually “sell” or positively impress others more.  Like today, making an embarrassment of yourself in front of others is something you don’t want to do, simply because it will make others simply have a lower opinion of you.  If the church taught a correct Goldenrule, then those purposely making products to fail before their time (for example) would bring more of a feeling of disgrace to oneself, then anything else, just like an embarrassment brings a feeling of disgrace to oneself.  It’s like most typical American greed suckers who are smart in putting the screws to everyone, will not do the same against their own children / family.  Therefore, we just have to make the church somehow teach how everyone is as much a desired equivalent pride as one’s own family member, instead of the opposite it teaches today.  Then the greed will be “both” for optimizing better things that don’t only profit the maker, but also that profits the user.  So, the “greed” answer is not one extreme or the other, its pride is used in combination for self and others.  The motivation for oneself, plus the pride in impressing others with quality, can bring only better quality and progress.  Today, it’s only the motive to improve that makes the better stuff; it’s the greed that limits its maximum potential.  If the church can somehow make an individual feel embarrassed when he wrongs another, then we’ve got it.  Today, religious cop-outs only do the opposite.

 

A church can preach for 59 minutes of a service about the Goldenrule, but can obliterate it all if they say “Jesus paid the penalty for your sins” in the last minute.  That’s saying it’s very important to not sin; but, (if you do, don’t worry, you’re covered).  That just shows that today’s church is in full employment of the Antichrist; and, I hate to make enemies, but they’re all too stupid to know it.  (I think stating the full truth is better than the acceptable bootlick otherwise.)

 

“Lay it on the line: don’t waste my time.” –Triumph, 1979:

You see, somebody has to bootlick (you all), and somebody has to lay it on the line.

 

“Thinking outside the box”:

It’s like being born in the 1920s and liking the Rock and Roll.  Few could do it.  People can’t reckon any better today: it’s just a different venue.

 

Being an atheist must require a thinking process:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/23551801@N03/3573610488/, Ribbon Sea Dragon Seahorse:

Leaf-like appendages to help blend in with surrounding plant life.  An act of God, not an act of mistakes.

 

What’s being a man?:

Answer:  Doin’ something difficult, or being strong.  Well, killing an innocent animal isn’t being strong: being strong is holding back from killing it.  Lifting 250 pounds above your head is “difficult” to do; like the Goldenrule is “difficult” to accomplish (when the real test comes).  But, today’s definition of being a man is doing things that are mean or just easy to accomplish.  Oh, also all the things the rich want you to do, like financially providing for your family, etc.  Therefore, the government just printing up its own money can be an apocalyptic change.  But, it all comes down to whether people like working more when they have more or when they have less?  The apparent “taught” consensus today is that the poorest people are most enthused about going to work… but stupid me thinks it’s the other way around.  Believing in religious cop-outs is really easy to do, also.  Likewise, getting “dirt” on your hands is manly, also.  Oh, how “difficult.”

 

I’ll misunderstand sometimes:

Sometimes I notice I’ll misinterpret people, in that what I think is important is not what they’re thinking is important, in understanding their point.  My consensus has to do with what’s good for the many; everyone else’s interest seems to be only what’s good for them.  In my understanding of others in common conversation, I need to re-learn this.  If I can remember when the reason for my talking years ago was just for me, then I can better understand people’s communication today.

 

Another instance where Jesus overrules the Old Testament:

Ecclesiastes 9:5-6:

5    For the living know that they will die;
      But the dead know nothing,
      And they have no more reward,
      For the memory of them is forgotten.
6    Also their love, their hatred, and their envy have now perished;
      Nevermore will they have a share
      In anything done under the sun.

Sounds like there was no guarantee of an Afterlife until Jesus.  Therefore, all Old Testament law was possibly for secular judgment; which changes all the time.

John 5:28-29:

28Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice 29and come forth—those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.

It’s too bad that everyone in the Old Testament wasn’t given all of God’s knowledge.  But, then if God did give them all more knowledge, then there’d be many all going in various contradicting directions on other matters.  God had to wait for “one” to come that had all the other stuff basically correct.  Mainly, Jesus wasn’t a bootlicker.  And, that’s why He died on the cross, according to the Bible.  He was one of the few who knew right from wrong, and wasn’t afraid the speak it.  If only there was “one” today that had it all correct, and even more so and in elaboration.  Someone protected by Freedom of Speech laws against the conservatism of our authorities.  Would it be someone like O’Reilly who conforms to all written laws, right or wrong; or someone who’s going to state where correction is needed (which angers a lot of authorities)?  Most (real) smart people know to be too selfish to cross authorities.  They also know that no one is going to support them if they cross the accepted standards.  I do it anyway because I know God wants me to, even though logic says it will never be accepted.

 

Don’t forget to say something (stronger) for the defenseless animals, Mr. Critical:

Open up puddy tat:

Why did God create dogs, cats, etc. with canine teeth, claws, etc., if He didn’t want them eating other animals?  I mean, right when something interesting is about to happen, it gets gobbled up by something bigger!  Therefore, God experiences many disappointments.  The problem: All bodies are priority designed to evolve for survival.  Self defense is always the initial directive.  The “bug” in the software is that whenever an animal gains advantage, sin always begets it choice.  Whabbits, ellyphunts, gorillies, hippopotameaneouseseses, etc. are the basic exception good guys.  But, the herbivore human, not by fangs, not by claws, but by spears, traps, etc. eat’em up all they can catch.  (We’d have a hard time tearing into a carcass without our tools.)  All them udder herbivores would also eat flesh if had an advantage.  The nature of the beasts is “selfishness.”  You got any great ideas on how to fix it?  Sure, there are secular laws, fights in bars, etc. but a knowledgeable fear of God is the only clincher.  So, what’s the world really need more of: Hannity’s or Goldenrule teachings?  I’ll take a break: you figger it out.

 

Ooow… evil!

Tame it down a bit, people:

 

Show us your stuff, baby!

 

 

No clowning around: That’s what we all really look like when we eat meat, in the eyes of God.

 

Like eating meat, God doesn’t want us all killing one another in war.  But, we certainly do it.  So, God can’t “just stop” things He doesn’t like.  But, many people have become atheists because they’ve been taught He can.  Only when certain people really want to serve God, is when God can “communicate” to us about His Goldenrule solution.  Yet there will still be earthquakes, hurricanes, etc.  The Goldenrule is just the optimal solution based on what we are, that will still not totally prevent other problems.

 

Mr. Critical – So ya’ think I’ve just clicked on the Windows XP “Do a trick” too many times?

 

TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/