Subject: The law is the law
September 5, 2006
The law is the law:
Now understand this, mister top ten, enemy-of-society Warren Jeffs criminal guy, one has to be at least 13 years old to get married in the State of New Hampshire, and 12 in the State of Kansas (prior to May 5, 2006). And six states (DE, FL, GA, KY, MD, OK) allow any pregnant female, any age, to marry without parental / guardian / leader consent. I think it has to do with money. Therefore, using your freedom-of-religion priestly authority (“including the performance of sacred rites and ordinances”) to allow a consensual 16 year old to marry, is being bad. Good for us all, that they caught you instead of those serial killers. You need to realize, sooner than later, that our highly paid, trusted authorities are really 99% self-serving power ego-trippers, and 1% helping society become safer. Their definition of American freedom is that they are free to not really do their job and still get paid. They are free to mainly pursue their self interests. They probably salute the American flag daily thanking it for that freedom. For example, the “number one” FBI most wanted is of course… a cop killer. And he’s just “wanted in connection with….” You’ve got to realize that’s the main reason they all got into that business. I mean, punching out a smaller kid in school can be a problem if he has an older brother; so, now they’re getting pure, untainted, non-retributive satisfactions. And people believe that what’s really going on in this country should be in charge of the world. The only possible explanation: people are true idiots. Since you’re going to be spending a lot of time in a cell, I suggest practicing saying “yes sir” a lot, and exercise the speed of getting down on your knees, and holding that position for long periods of time. That should help lessen your sentence.
Polygamy should just be not recommended; because, when you have a man that has, say, ten wives, that means there’s basically nine men somewhere doing without (and 9 women also doing without). But, a law means violence (if not obeyed and resisted), and I don’t think there should be violence to stop consensual polygamy. Just like how Paul said there should not be a law against marriage in 1 Corinthians 7, but did highly recommend against it. Although Jesus Christ did state a commandment to not marry in His law, Jesus was for non-violence. (It has to so with the last word “χωρείτω” of Matthew 19:12 which is in the Greek verb “imperative” form. An “imperative” means “expression of a command,” “not to be avoided or evaded: NECESSARY,” “COMMAND, ORDER” –Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 1997, p. 582.) Sure, I welcome having your pastor / priest email me to tell me how I’m wrong. I won’t get any emails, but if you could just tell him, so he will a least know about another “command” of Jesus Christ to ignore. “Freedom” also means to be a pastor, priest or pope, ignore Jesus, and still have a job. I know nobody’s sending me a charitable donation (which I sure could use), which just reassures me that I’m preaching the true Gospel, and providing “realistic” ideas to improve current event situations. I’ll get down on my knees and say “yes sir” maybe next year.
JonBenet Ramsey / John Mark Karr case:
I don’t know whether he did it or didn’t do it anymore than anyone else. But, I should note, the Boulder prosecutor dropping the charges after finding insufficient evidence and therefore admitting her mistake, is a thing that a least should be honored; because there are so many people in this country that are not strong enough to admit error; e.g., George W. Bush, Mike Nifong (Duke Rape Case prosecutor), etc. I did notice the Boulder prosecutor got lots of flak for being honest. Flakers: more dumber or more evil? I call it being strong enough to admit error; lots of Americans call it flip-flop. Flip-flop bashers: more evil or more evil? Okay… what would make it a better world: (1) People who don’t admit error, or (2) People who admit error? What / who’s going to win in the end? But, who’s going to win today?-?-?
It’s NOT FAIR for Iran to have nuclear weapons and us to have them too:
Sounds like a good, brave and honorable excuse to start killing some people, don’t you think? We need to begin some violence to let Iran know that “we,” not them, are the righteous ones who should be the only righteous ones who deserve nuclear weapons. We are going to prove that we are not evil like Adolph Hitler who tried to take over the entire world, by forcing every country on this planet to become a “democracy” (unless their people are crazy and vote in someone we don’t like). Politicians who embezzle all the taxpayers’ and charities’ money before it gets to New Orleans are the ones who should be in charge of the world.
Israel:
You know, most Americans aren’t smart enough to figure this, but logically, I think the best thing, and most healthy thing, for the United States, to lessen terrorism against us, is to “just let” Hezbollah, Iran, or whoever “wipe Israel off the map”: just kinda look the other way for a couple of weeks. That would make the chances of me being killed during a terrorist attack… less, since terrorists’ reasons seem to always include the Israel thing. We’ll just tell ‘em we’re sorry; we had another O.J. thing going on. “Shucks, golly, darn…. No, I don’t know how we’re all going to live without terrorists wanting to kill us.” Of course, the best thing is to just make Israel give their government to the Palestinians; build a Western Wall cop-out thing near Lubbock, and then not complain about it when they start doing whatever it is they start doing that everybody seems to not like. Maybe we could show them that the Golden Rule is also their primary duty to God. –No, don’t bother: I’m sure the Western Wall would win. Giving full “restitution” to the Palestinians would make them “perfect.” But this world is a loooooooong way from perfect. I am totally aware practically everyone in this country “thinks” we’re “perfect.” That’s the main reasons for my necessary (constructive) insults: Bootlick doesn’t seem to work – that’s just what the dumb and selfish want to me to do. I could probably have lots of fast Cadillac’s if I neatly charmed them about what precisely delights their hearts so dear. Invite’em out to the ranch. Tell’em that space people extracted the Eastern Wall just before the Romans knocked it down, worshipped on it for nearly 1900 years, then dropped it off for you near Roswell, NM in 1947 (well, the earth moved). So, now that the true alien story is out of the bag, go for it…. Hey, maybe they could move into the Indian Pueblos and share genocide stories. There is that Holocaust & Intolerance Museum and Study Center in Albuquerque, that covers genocide against both Native Americans and Jews. If not, well then I’m sure the Israeli conflict will be the base cause of the end of the world. Everyone thinks we’ll know when to stop, but I don’t think we will, since never-admitting-fault seems to be the standard, coupled with the actual ability to fool one’s self. And the general public won’t know anything: they’re really all about as dumb as a rock (from my point of view). They really all just want to know who they should trust. For example: It staggers me knowing how many people will run toward a machine gun just because they have full trust in somebody (e.g., during all of WWII). Yep, a true leader who knows true right from wrong is what the world really needs. Not just another leader who just “thinks” they know right from wrong, based on what past leaders have taught them. For example, we wouldn’t have the present big Iraqi mess if a rock had been President.
Islam:
Islamic obligations include the duty to “commend good and reprimand evil.” They just need to realize what evil really is (and only): anytime you hurt an innocent person. They do have good argument for reprimanding most Americans. Muhammad mainly preached for the rich to give to the poor. I’m sure a lot of Muslins have their cop-outs around this. Muhammad thought for sure that the Jews and Christians would welcome His new revelations from God; but, they didn’t; and, of course, the opposite. It makes sense that during the time of Muhammad, the Catholic Church suppressed the very important fact that Jesus mainly preached for the rich to give to the poor (hence, the need for a replicating prophet). It’s still highly unknown amongst the Protestants. My inspiration doesn’t really come from a voice or a dream. My inspiration comes directly from logic, hence reality, hence God. In other words, everything I get has to fit with logic and reality regardless of how good I feel when I receive it (and I get all kinds of inspiration). I don’t see how any future “prophet” could acquire it any better. I’ve progressively and uniquely reckoned that logic in reality is what God really wants, logically. Should God help me with my logical endeavor? Should mankind help me with my logical endeavor? I wish someone could just spread around my basic messages (about war, marriage, fairness, etc.) so I can spend my time working on more difficult challenges, like an actual functional way to see back in time. I’m enthused about it; I know, you all just want to quit reading. I think all the historic data of the entire universe is coming out of that light bulb next to you right now. We just have to develop a way to detect it all to our perspective, then start letting it draw pictures. Our minds are continually doing it. Our minds could even detect other universal histories (other than our own self history: outside of our bodies), if we realize what it is, how it works, and henceforth how to perceive it. Once we can see history, we can recreate it, and… even bring people back to life. It will be you, head to toe, with every memory, thought and feeling you have now; conversing / being with other fully recreated people you now know. So you can all go to the same recreated bowling alley and have the exact same good times that you do today. So what’s the real difference, as far as “you” are concerned? But not everybody: Jesus told about the resurrection of the dead (Luke 14:12-14; 20:34-36; John 5:27-29), probably about a thousand years from now. It makes sense that the first person they reincarnate will be Jesus Christ (he really just keeps getting more popular as time goes on, because he said it right). But, none of this is going to happen if Israel gets its way.
It has to do with a theory that the (historic) center of the universe (and everything time-wise in-between) is in the center of (and incrementally centered in) every particle… from each particle’s perspective. But, from our perspective, it moves as history moves. We will need to start with a very, very high resolution scanner, that also detects the direction and intensity / size of each sub-energy hit vibrating out of the particle, again in even higher resolution. I don’t think I’ll being seeing one on the shelf at Best Buy next week, so it’s something for the future. The “beam me up Scotty” in Star Trek is also possible using the same basic technology, but you wouldn’t necessarily have to disappear from your original spot (wouldn’t that maybe be “better”?). Our minds are constantly doing the same basic thing. That’s how we “remember.” The entire universe is also attainable in our minds but our overwhelming living senses greatly block-out our ability to access / detect it. Psychics who, e.g., help police find people who are lost, are apparently able to momentarily block out their overwhelming self history and access outside of their own body / direct senses. People who have experienced past lives probably have, but they’re really not limited to just one past life per generation. I still don’t know who the people are in my nightly dreams, and/or who writes the scenarios. Angels? I know that other people / entities have tried to lie to me in my dreams. While asleep, year ago, I quit telling these entities / people in my dreams that they are part of my dream, because they would always just freeze up, and it would always cause me to wake up, and as a result, become more sleep depraved the next day. So, now, I just go along with whatever they want me to believe. Yeah, most of the time it’s great.
You say “that won’t be me – that will be just a copy of me.” Well, for you adventurous types, you can hang out again with your same old beer boozin’ buddies, where you can drive your car off a mountain road, just to have your friends recreate you back to life, so you can say: “All-right! What a rush! Let’s do that again!” Having fun in the Rockies in 3006. Of course, bring back friends that you can trust to bring you back to life: You don’t want that to be the real end, do you? Or, if you’re Irish, have one hell of a bar brawl using whatever weapon you want to bring. By then, surely they’ll have a way to ease pain; or, hey, maybe they’ll just have the beer do it. Russian: roulette can be your national sport. Military guys: have all the action you want – it’ll be kinda like a video game, but real. According to all your friends you’re you. According to you, you’re you. So why do you think today, that you won’t be you? Armchair adventurers: Key-in to any point in history and be part of it. Live in Dodge City for a couple of days – with the fictional actor character Matt Dillon. O’Reilly, you can be a jackanapes. Lots of people will just want to recreate those old times (void of the problems). “Rocky Top you'll always be home sweet home to me” –Osborne Brothers, 1968. “I miss back when” –Tim McGraw, 2004. George W. Bush: Kill all the innocent Iraqi civilians you want – wait a minute… even then, probably only with their permission first. Well, maybe it won’t be all that wild – but I don’t know: when I analyze true human emotional desires, well… maybe. Possibly a favorite past-time will be the allowed implementation of true revenge on all the people who unfairly wronged you in this life today (John 5:27-29: 27and has given Him authority to execute judgment also, because He is the Son of Man. 28Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice 29and come forth—those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.). So yeah… let’s burn alive more innocent civilians. Our government leaders have sorted out all the variables and have determined that the gain we receive is worth the price they pay… unless there’s ever a future resurrection.
72 virgin afterlife wives promised to suicide terrorists:
Hey… what they don’t tell you is they stay virgins through eternity. That’s right: for them to retain the title “virgins” you can’t have sex with them. But you are stuck with them: you have to constantly listen to 72 griping / whining women through the rest of eternity. Ha-ha-ha, surprise! Of course, you might tell the terrorists, that applies only if they lose their dingy before they die, like from an explosion of some kind. So, take down that airplane, or blow up that building, and you will be able to brag for the rest of eternity that you have 72 “virgin” wives. That’s a lot. How sweet!
The economy:
You know, if O’Reilly gets his way with the word “pithy,” I predict that in 20-30 years, politicians will have more concise ways of debating the same old, long, drawn-out issues of the past: The opponent will say, “The economy: it SUCKS!” The incumbent will say, “The economy: it ROCKS!” The opponent: “No! It SUCKS!” The incumbent: “ROCKS!” The opponent: “SUCKS!” The incumbent: “ROCKS!” Right in each other’s face. I just hope I’ll be around to see it.
So we have to ask ourselves: Do we feel lucky? – Do we want a future economy that shakes, rattles and rolls, or do we want to lower minimum wage? Question: What really makes a person do his job better: (A) A higher wage, or (B) A lower wage? What makes a person more honest doing his job: (A) A higher wage, or (B) A lower wage? What makes the rich get temporarily richer: (A) A higher wage, or (B) A lower wage? “I believe you’re doin’ me wrong and now I know: The more I work the faster my money goes. … Well you never do nothin’ to save your doggone soul.” –Bill Haley and His Comets, 1955. What kind of economy would we have if we took all the money we’ve spent on the Iraq war, and had instead distributed it to all our lowest paid workers: (A) More better and honest work done, or (B) Less profit for the rich man? By raising minimum wage, will we have more or less college graduates?
“If everybody everywhere, had a little lighter load to bear, and a little bigger piece of the pie, we’d be livin’ us a pretty good life – and that’d be alright.” –Alan Jackson, 2002.
“Won't you tell me if you can – ‘cause life's so hard to understand – why's the rich man busy dancing, while the poor man pays the band. Oh they're billing me for killing me. Lord have mercy on the working man.” –Travis Tritt, 1992.
“Charlie's got a gold watch. Don't seem like a whole lot, after thirty years of drivin' up and down the interstate.” –Kathy Mattea, 1988.
“They're makin' it hard on the workin' man, tryin' to make a livin' any way he can. Makin' ends meet on the installment plan, his money goes right through his hands. Heaven, help him if you think you can -- they're makin' it hard on the workin' man” –John Conlee, 1985.
“'Cause it's a bittersweet symphony, this life. Trying to make ends meet: you're a slave to money then you die” –The Verve, 1997.
“Well, I was 22 working double overtime, I was spending dollars and making dimes” –Phil Vassar, 2004.
“A rich man goes to college and a poor man goes to work” –Charlie Daniels, 1980.
“He works way too much for way too little” (Hell Yeah) –Montgomery Gentry, 2003.
“I'm a hard workin' man. I wear a steel hard hat, I can ride, rope, hammer and paint, do things with my hands that most men can't. I can't get ahead no matter how hard I try, I'm gettin' really good at barely gettin' by.” –Brooks and Dunn, 1993.
Of course, after I elaborated about all this stuff in 1998, we’ve got: “Hard work pays off the way it should” –Aaron Tippin (a real hard worker’s patriot), 2001. Except still, “There’s too much month at the end of the money” –Marty Stuart, 2003. That ought to be enough.
I don’t know if anybody else has noticed, but products don’t work as good, or last near as long as they used to. So, do you all really think that direction should be the way of the future? Well, I think it’s getting to be quite an art to make things fail before its time, so they can sell you another one that much sooner. Plus, I’m sure a lot of it is just more and more goof-ups. Maybe soon they’re put a timer in products, so when it says 1 year warranty, that’s when it will stop working. Oh-oh, I don’t want to give anybody any more ideas.
I just opened up a new brand of work-out protein mix in a very large canister – it’s only about two-thirds full (I’m sure their standard fill). So, there’s another kind of deception that’s in need of improvement.
Above the hypothesis of a fair treated, enthused laborer / worker, conversely, it seems the more the rich man makes, the more dishonest he becomes; so, technically, maybe there’s a base line, range and limit to honesty and pride in the actual product / service instead of pride only in ones self; and therefore, maybe there is “an” advantage to the Iraq war, because the rich man would have it all if it wasn’t in Iraq (even though most ignorantly support the war just because they support Bush). I think the harder and/or less desirous jobs should be the ones that pay the most, which would streamline the economy even more: If you have more people wanting to do the nitty-gritty necessary jobs, then more necessary stuff is going to get accomplished. “You ain’t seen nothin’ yet” –Al Gore, 2000. – Well, scratch his name off of that and put mine there. We should also make true innovations a guaranteed high paid return, like a government financial reward. Oh, sure it still has to sell. But, it won’t as likely get lost because of bad marketing, or overly rewarded like in the pharmaceutical industry. Make it easy for software company employees to get another job when their ideas reach their apex, so they won’t feel the need to antiquate everyone’s reliable programs, and make them incompatible with new hardware so quickly, just so Microsoft, etc. can try to pretend it’s 1982 and start it all over again at the users’ expense. Every update seems to take away some good functionality while introducing usually just fad. Software companies need to realize that it’s lots of our old programs that made computers the success they are today; so, it would be nice to somehow not just put the screws to everyone just so you’ll have more to give to the poor. I’m all for helping the poor, but let’s find another way to finance it.
I question if thousands of employees working against each other (for hundreds of different companies), is really better, and more cost effective, than just hundreds of employees working together, e.g., for the cure of a disease. Are all the redundancies really necessary? Same thing with a lot of other products, ideas and innovations. Oh, I see, that keeping up with the Joneses, I’m better than you, fad rich people enjoy, might sacrifice. The only reason our economy works better than others is because generally the harder jobs do get paid more, but it’s still far from perfect.
Government listening to our telephone conversations (and recording every keystroke, mouse-click, and webpage downloaded on our computers):
“I always feel like, somebody's watching me. Whoa-oa-oa. I always feel like, somebody's watching me. Who's playing tricks on me?” –Rockwell, 1984. So now, paranoid people may be the ones who are right. It’s just nice to know that some idiot is listening-in and judging every word we say during our “private” conversations. I don’t think it would be all that bad if they were just trying to stop crime and terrorism; but, like I said above about the FBI, I can easily see them doing it mostly to just later harass people who don’t like the authorities (and that’s gotta be a lot), and critical people who practice Freedom of Speech. And, with probably 9 out of 10 actions they take being based on an evil, self-satisfying idiot’s harassing games, ignorance, mistakes, entrapments, and/or flat-out framing / railroading, it can be down right dangerous for the non-criminal. It wouldn’t surprise me if most of the people in our prisons / jails are really there for violations of the mouth. In other words, there are probably 10 guys free for every one in prison who did the same crime but correctly said “yes sir” and was stern and steady while standing on his knees. It makes sense that people who actually didn’t even do the crime (were simply wrongly accused / framed / railroaded) could likely be the one’s who complain the most, thereby getting even longer sentences. Yes, I’m sure lots of people have been wrongly accused and framed by women, etc. just for spite. And with what I see in the news a lot: railroaded / sandbagged just so a prosecutor or judge can save face, when the evidence comes out of their innocence. – I’ve personally known a few power abusers, and their justification is that their reputation is far too valuable for the community good, to be blemished. They think it’s of mandatory importance that the public trusts its authorities. The only possible way to stop this kind of stuff is an actual fear of God. – Absolutely nothing else will work. And today’s churches do everything they can to diminish that fear. It is really ludicrous and pathetic how dumb the public and media really are, from my point of view. And I don’t even have the time to start taking about gender bias, and other standardized favoritism issues. A woman can cut off a man’s willie and basically get off, but if a man cut off a piece of a woman’s anatomy, I don’t care how much she deserved it, he would (rightfully) be in prison for a very long time. Yeah, let’s make these kinds of judgments in charge of the entire world. The court has two words that describe the same thing: If they don’t like someone (or, have favoritism against them) it’s called “motive.” If they like someone, it’s called “justification.” I know it’s a combination of both, but what I don’t know, which is it more of: dumb or evil? Isn’t there a female getting off right now for drowning her five (5) young kids? I’d like to see the calluses on her knees. I mean, half the reason for a justice system is to create a deterrent for others to see. I shouldn’t have to be the one who reminds our court system about that. It’s nice to know we live in a talkin’-proud country where little kids are now in just that much more danger. “We're walking real proud and we're talking real loud again in America” –Charlie Daniels, 1980. "She needs help," the jury foreman said at a post-verdict press briefing. Little kids: “Yes ma’am / sir” and forget the feet: just learn to walk on your knees, is what I recommend. Instead, let’s use our brains and just get that big top-10 Warren Jeffs “consensual allower” danger. If I became nuts and drowned five little kids, then discovered what I did, the authorities wouldn’t have to find me (for an assured death penalty), I’d just quickly drop myself into one of those Iraqi people shredders (feet first) over a UPS box addressed to the sheriff. But, you know, technically, that’s not near as bad as what George W. Bush has done to Iraqi children. – Israel did to the Lebanese children. Etc. And the real danger is, people don’t know that.
You know, there are a lot of people in this country that don’t get my emails who still already know it all. – Try to notice that.
I was informed in the 1980s that every telephone conversation in the free world is being recorded, but that fact has to be kept hidden from the public for obvious reasons. But the vast majority are not being listened to by a human; because, that’s when it really starts costing the government money. They can just go back and listen if they want. So, remember, every personal thought, feeling and emotion you share with your loved ones may be entertaining some pig somewhere who would quickly arrest you (for an actual crime) if you did the same to him. If the public became very complainant on the issue, the government would definitely continue to do it and just say they’re not: they would have to just hide it better. The public easily “just trusts” the people they highly pay to be honest; so, it would be easy. If the public feels the need for the government to be more honest, they will just pay them all more money.
Mr. Critical – Just in case anyone wants to know what’s really going on.
-- Home (Index) --