Subject: Mr. Critical is my name, pokin’ fun at the dumb / educated is my game
August 28, 2007
It’s fun sitting at the helm:
After noticing the many reactions of my mailings, feeling like I’m in charge of the world, I begin to realize how powerful a computer on a small wobbly desk in the secluded corner of a bedroom, can be. Sometimes I’ll just stand up, push aside the chair, and pound left and right at the keyboard while playing Tchaikovsky’s 1812 Overture. Then for the finale, I’ll fling away all the accumulated mail and papers to find that little mouse (we’re lucky it has a tail), to poignantly click Send while hearing the last canon fire, then fall backwards into bed listening to the applause.
“And my soul has been psychedelicized”:
Ex-druggies, I can take you back in time to the 1970s. Just stare at this while moving your scroll wheel up and down for a while:
Ha, ha! I fooled you! Now that I’ve got you in my trance, you will all succumb to me, and tell all the O’Reilly’s to go jump in a lake.
“Now the time has come. There are things to realize. Time Has Come Today.” –Chambers Brothers, 1968. I can tell by listening to people and reading, that there’s no way you all can do it without me. It would probably take 500 to 1000 years for you all to know (via the hard way) what I can tell you all in minutes. And that’s if you can survive an inevitable World War III. – Our cover-up of the ethical facts hasn’t changed one bit. And just because one President may be learning the hard way, doesn’t mean the next President has learned, simply because the root reasons for all the violence against us is not being (sufficiently) revealed. And that would just correct one kind of wrong; there are lots of other possible base reasons for future wars. During our entire war history, each side would impress the other side with technological and/or methodological surprises. But, we don’t think that could happen in the future. Knowing that we have been looking hard for WMDs in places where they are not, suggests that they probably are where we don’t yet know / suspect. No one with the CIA, etc. will admit to that, simply because they think they already know it all – like WMDs in Iraq. Once there’s an advantage for the U.S. (which could simply be the pride of a statement), which hurts them, then ….
Michael Vick case:
I hear a lot of probable meat eaters on the news bragging how they know right from wrong while reprehending Michael Vick. “Dumb” animals is all we are. – My simple wisdom isn’t getting out there, is it?
That’s right, we’s be needin’ to get some attention from da man:
“I Wanna Talk About Me.” –Toby Keith, 2001:
I remember my older brother looked kind of like John Lennon when he had the big beard and longest hair. He also had a wildly painted up ’57 Chevy with a bumper sticker that said “Support Our Boys in Canada.” I didn’t care – it was transportation. He got a college deferment. I just turned 18 after they stopped the draft. Or, I’d probably be dead. People just don’t go the college who are constantly blowing their nose, have a major sleeping problem, and can barely see 20/40 with correction. So, I assume if it wasn’t for all that, and a later 80s / early 90s series of bad luck, I’d be a normal O’Reilly idiot.
I guess after all that attention for the man, he finally got the message: “Don’t trust anyone over 30.” Hey, if I say this, will everyone know they are never justified in hurting an innocent person?
Today, at best, people are only asking: Is my clean mean-machine keen to make the scene with the Green? And well paid heathens like Hannity are opposing that as much as possible, likely for the advantage of the few. Hannity knows “the few” can write a much larger pay check. Hannity: more dumb or more evil. Hannity’s the exception: he’s more evil.
O’Reilly, my dad would have loved you. Hannity, he wasn’t that stupid, he’d have turned the channel by then. He would have said guys like John Kerry were just idiots. I wander what he’d think about George W. Bush.
CIA 9/11 “mistakes” are “exposed” just intending to fool people into wanting to escalate the war in Iraq:
Just so one person can save face.
I know “I” looked like the dodo back in February, 1998:
But, “We still got a long way to go.” –Alice Cooper, 1971.
Just have Blake Shelton help you think about this, the next time you watch Hannity:
Take a chance:
Disseminate my five issues, and see what happens. Go ahead, take the risk and test the waters: at least try driving your car through that flooded highway:
Hey, no problem: a person can still easily have his dictionary on dash and crossword puzzle in hand. So what’s stopping you? Go for it!
Results of the money system:
For the profit of the few, sometimes it’s easy to see how advancements are not being shared equally and fairly in God’s world:
“Have You Forgotten?” (released 3-8-03; number one on Billboard for 7 weeks):
…how Darryl Worley explained his superior intelligence how we needed to invade Iraq… because of 9/11. I think guys like Darryl Worley would still get a lot more cheers today then me. Of course, with all the one-sided media information he was subjected to at the time, and only no answer pacifists surrounding the scene, how could a one-step thinker figure anything else? And I’m still not hearing any reports about the slant drilling, and restitution for killing innocent people. So nothing has really changed, except that we’re “losing.” That’s all history will record, is that we “lost,” and no one in the future will ever know why (the real reason). O’Reilly says the future will judge President Bush. I don’t see how that could ever come out positive for the President, since no WMDs were ever found.
The Answer My Friend to the war / justice issue:
To be pithy, one is never justified in hurting an innocent person, and only those who hurt an innocent person should be hurt. Me and my buddy Mr. Google can’t seem to find anything like that phrase on the entire www. And, that’s just one of the five issues.
Michael Vick:
I can understand the thrill of watching two dogs tearing each other into pieces. And the superior feeling betting on the one I know is going to win. In Ancient Rome, women would masturbate themselves to high orgasms to the rich pleasure of watching people being slaughtered in the arena. Yeah, it’s all fun and dandy, but unfortunately, to be superior in wisdom, I have to tell you all that the Goldenrule is what God wants. I’ll get my kicks by calling my local pharmacy asking if they know what’s the best website to get my meds from Canada?
I like it when Fox News puts rivals on. They’ll usually end up talking vociferously at the same time. I will usually place my paws on both sides of the T.V. and hop up and down like a chimpanzee. Next time, someone sneak into the studio and place a piece of duck tape over O’Reilly’s mouth so he can’t interrupt. Then whoever’s left standing, that will be the one who was in the right. That’s how we’ll usually judge things.
The O.J. book “If I Did It”:
Yeah, contrary to O’Reilly’s one-step thinking limit, it’s always good to have a criminal tell why he did it. It has something to do with “knowledge” in preventing things like that from happening again, instead of everyone’s “already know it all.” (An open sex world, by the way, would not produce such jealousies and/or demands.) The criminal profiting should be secondary to knowledge, which isn’t even the case any more. You see, hypothetically, if everyone had the knowledge of everything, like God has, then we’d understand everything, and not cause any problems. We’d all certainly become instant vegetarians highly appalled by animal slaughter, realize the illogic of all our cop-outs, know to not report issues biasly, try our hardest to minimize hurting criminals, pay employees fairly, and create more sexual pleasures, while optimizing progress. But, still today, “dumb” prevails.
Come on people, quit looking like a dumb ass:
“Minimize hurting criminals”?:
Yes, until the correct and full religious teaching of the Goldenrule (instead of cop-outs), from time to time one of our brothers or sisters will hurt another one of our innocent brothers or sisters. In such case we will need to discipline / punish as we do with our very own children. When they make it apparent that the cop-outs of the 21st century should still be graced, we will suffer great displeasure in having to lock them up just so they can’t hurt / kill another. So, since it’s still the 21st century, let’s not treat our brothers and sisters in Iran like we would want to be treated, let’s bomb the hell out of them, so we can reap the pleasures of learning the hard way. Also, so I can try out that masturbating idea while watching the news.
“Helplessly Hoping” –Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young, 1969.
ONE Critical chart (the simple answer under 4K):
Plus, a Good Deed / Not Sinning mixture of rights and wrongs that need to be corrected:
3) Rid all religious cop-outs (above chart is only rule)
4) Fair(er) pay, to equate to the hardship degree of the job (yeah, it benefits the majority)
5) Vegetarian: kindness to animals
And we’ll be “Feeling Stronger Every Day” –Chicago, 1973.
“They are 1 person. They are 2 alone. They are 3 together. They are for each other.”
Now, let me know if you have a better idea.
Where’s it happening, man?:
“California: Rest in peace” –Red Hot Chili Peppers, 2006. Just forget it if it’s not close to the FairWay.
“Never hurt an innocent person”:
Anyone who thinks this is already the way it is, it isn’t, or we’d put President Bush in prison, e.g.
Deep thoughts:
“And we proceeded to tear that hotel down. We’re An American Band.” Grand Funk, 1973. Have you ever wondered if Grand Funk has any problems booking hotel rooms? I mean, do you think Travelosity has a virus blocker up on the name “Grand Funk.” Well guys, just check-in as The Chipmunks. Nobody knows what they look like.
Fox News reports that the surge is working, and that the other stations just don’t have to guts to admit it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_bombings_in_Iraq_since_2003:
August 22: Two suicide vehicle bombers wounded 11 American servicemembers when they drove their fuel tankers into U.S.-Iraqi outpost in Taji. They also killed four Iraqi soldiers and injured four more. A suicide bomber in Baiji rammed a fuel truck into a police station. Both police and civilians were among the 45 killed and 80 wounded. Six people were killed and 50 were wounded when a suicide motorbike bomber struck a police patrol in a Muqdadiyah marketplace.
And they’re all doing it just for the fun of it.
John Couey sentenced to death:
It only takes a one-step thinking process to realize the atrocity of the crime. But, George W. Bush is getting another high dollar pay check, simply because it takes a two-step thinking process to realize the atrocity he’s caused in Iraq. Which would you choose: (1) being a raped and suffocated 9-year-old, or (2) being many 9-year-olds dying via having your entire body set on fire? Let’s see… I’ll have someone force just my hand on the burner of this stove, until it burns completely through. OUCH!!!!!!!!! – to put in mildly (or, to be mellow like Ted Nugent would want me to be). I’d (personally) quickly give the death penalty to someone just to stop that. But, with realistic limited human reasoning abilities, we’ll just give him another high dollar pay check. “Dumb”: it takes a two-step reckoning to realize it. John Couey had to kill the little girl so he wouldn’t get caught. President Bush has to continue his aggression in Iraq to save face: just to try to make it “look” more justified. “Smart”: it’d be a better world with it. But, I’m going to be dead someday. So, Dumb boys, dumb boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when I’m through with you? Well, Barack Obama would just start mindlessly killing some other people. You see, Mr. Critical, no one in this justified country is going to vote for restitution. We’re just going to say that the insurgency in Iraq just proves those people only want to kill us because we aren’t Muslim. Ask Hannity. He knows. Barack would be informed that the only way we can complete the mission is to kill innocent people in those houses. Barack would hesitantly say, “Okay, go ahead.” Barack would be informed that the best way we can keep American soldiers out of harms way, is to kill innocent people in those houses. Barack would hesitantly say, “Okay, go ahead.” Barack would be informed that the only way we can win this war is for one of his loved ones to die. Barack would quickly say, “no way!”
However, George is smart enough to know if he can make it look like we’ve “won,” then the people will believe all the atrocities against the innocents were justified. He’s dumb thinking God will. I think George doesn’t really believe it God – he just goes to church for all the “just in case” cop-outs.
And all the same for Bill Clinton, for all you Democrats.
And, if the news people aren’t going to show the Iraq atrocities (or, just describe them like Couey’s judge did), then the people aren’t even going to be able to reckon to the first-step. Such should also show the U.S. soldier dropping the bomb that caused it, e.g. And those who would refuse to watch it, don’t have any room to complain if the next terrorist attack kills them.
I still think Couey wouldn’t have done it if he’d have had a very satisfying adult sex life – and one without church condemnation. With the church making you think you’re going to Hell anyway just because you have “a” sexual desire, then might as well kidnap and rape little kids because they’re lots easier to overpower than adults.
I don’t see anything in the media that would add to making Couey feel he doesn’t have a satisfied adult sex life:
And, even if you’re older (I was just trying to innocently get through the checkout at Wal-Mart):
Well, it sells. Well, there’s a reason it sells, and I seem to be the only living person who knows how to best organize that reason. But you all think we already have the best method in financing the support of our kids. With half of divorced men not even paying their child support. Again, 200 years ago Indian women had plenty of time to not only do all the necessary work for themselves, all their kids, but also for all the men. And they were reportedly very promiscuous compared to European / American women. A woman today has no free food or free shelter to even raise one kid, without being stricken by the guilt and shame of welfare. And “civilization” is too smart to realize why there’s so much inner-city drugs and violence. Yeah, let’s just see someone “educated” explain this to you all after I’m dead and gone.
Most people would say I’m nuts comparing a reborn Christian like President Bush to Couey. And I’d say thank you for supporting my point that most people are true idiots.
There are some problems that my advice won’t prevent:
It’s the Wicked Witch of the West (some things just fit):
Talking about sexual attractive – yeah, if you fly on a broom. I can well perceive this face hanging over me… right before I feel the stake going into my heart. God’s telling me to not be this kind of personal. I’ll just pretend one of my loved ones just had a funeral, because this is torture chamber material: someone oughta get her into show business. Shirley, practice speaking in tongues (like imbeciles do in churches), for a third Exorcist movie. Halloween mask manufacturers: hold up a picture of Shirley next to Lilly Munster, to easily see which one looks scarier (just use rope for Roper’s hair). Yeah, Hollywood just can’t recreate that kind of reality. If you look not so hard, you can see fire coming out of her mouth.
See what I mean:
Who would you rather show up with at your high school reunion? The one on the right, if you want them all to beat you up again. And I can actually sense a stench coming right out of the picture. Readers: Sorry for the foul and disgusting piece. O’Reilly, the next time you put down innocent people, you’re gonna get these pictures emailed to you! (I guess it’s sometimes my job to lower myself to their level; or, I’m just trying to recede the media lust I displayed earlier.)
Yes, I’d much rather do her:
(Margaret Hamilton, actress who played the “Wicked Witch of the West” in The Wizard of Oz.)
Kansas is Oz-some:
Except for a certain group that protests at the Utah miners’ and their rescuers’ memorial services.
(The above satire is a good example of non-constructive criticism.)
Phelps family members all coincidentally, open-mindedly just think the same:
Or, this just proves my point that we all are just as we are taught (especially if your name is O’Reilly). Therefore, when the Goldenrule (instead of cop-outs) become predominantly religiously taught, it will easily be a much better world (it will need to trickle down first). Churches would also “need” to rid the lie about the marriage standard, so people won’t have such a strong (God placed) reason to avoid the Church. And secular society “needs” to find a better way to “guarantee” financial support for all children, and non-shame-and-guilt support. I guess first base would have to be having cures for all the STDs.
Once the Goldenrule is the conservative standard, then how could anyone rationally “win” an argument for anything “better”??? Yeah, maybe if we all go back in time to when we couldn’t communicate.
George, it’s been nearly ten years since my February 1998 “important” fax:
So now I suggest: “Ahhooww… Get up offa that thing, and dance until you feel better. Get up offa that thing, just try to release that pressure.” –James Brown, 1976. I’ve heard few Iraqis today have running water, and those that do know it’s filled with germs. Same with electricity. They should blame it all on Saddam Hussein for his killings in Dujail. Or, because of his refusal to inform the location of his WMDs. Or, for ruling a country where oil could be attained via slant drilling. Anyway you want to look at it, they need to realize we did it for their freedom – freedom from water and electricity. You see, water could wash protective oils off the skin, and someone could electrocute themselves if they accidentally touched the wire.
My September 20, 2002 advice:
Do you all think we’d have less Iraqi problems today if Saddam Hussein would have transferred power over to the United States? After “I” brought up this idea up in my letter, I read in the 9-26-02 USA Today how our government “could accept” an “exile” deal, where Saddam Hussein would be banished to another country, in exchange for “yield[ing] power,” which was the first time the idea was in the news. The key difference was, I suggested a retirement kind of thing, where we’d have our travel experts “enthuse” Saddam about seeing the many available exiting and interesting world attractions. I even suggested many. Most people’s ideal retirement does include lots of travel. But, this would require the simple treating of Saddam Hussein like a human being. “Exile” is simply the insulting way of saying the same. I later told that “exile” was not going to make Saddam want to hand over the Iraqi government to us, where our financing his traveling the world, with U.S. Secret Service protection, probably would have. Right before our invasion, if you recall the news, Saddam allowed all our weapons inspection demands, but because he refused to go into “exile” we invaded – with aggression and with extreme violence, to cause the pickle we definitely don’t know how to get out of today. Henceforth, I wondered if I had been the cause of the Iraq invasion. Usually my great ideas have to be followed to a tee, not a bee. I wasn’t just wasting my time doing all of that writing unless I thought it would do some good. Of course, how can I give perfect advice, when our reborn Christian President had so much hatred that he can’t even use the right words to achieve it? “Pride” in not showing any kindness to Saddam Hussein is why thousands are dying today, and why we’re actually “losing” the war. Things couldn’t be better from “my” prideful point of view. There’s a big difference between someone who knows how to walk with Christ and someone who just thinks they do. I blame it entirely on the multitude of Church cop-outs. If we could have gifted Saddam (and his lady) with just one perfect scenic and romantic cruise, I think we’d have had it (Iraq with no insurgency problems). Do you all think George was more dumb or more evil? Well, evil usually wins.
Attention American soldiers in Iraq:
If you haven’t yet killed a baby, then try to realize you just represent the people who have. I don’t see how “I” could feel right with God, being geographically in support of baby killing… unless I was a normal idiot. “Dumb”: it’s simple to achieve.
Say no to drugs:
I think God purposely weakened the minds of the people who resort to drugs, just so “I” will be the only one with all the answers. E.g., “Don’t trust anyone over 30” just doesn’t cut it. Nor does “Just pull out.” We could have saved millions of South Vietnamese lives if we would have given the North proper restitution (i.e., just to the “innocent” lives we destroyed).
The one big achievement did happen:
The military draft was ended in January 1973. But just that is obviously not all the answers. Iraqi insurgents feel that other Iraqis who don’t join the insurgency are not “innocent” and therefore can deserve death. But I disagree; because, that’d be like a penalty for draft dodgers. And forcing anyone to kill (the draft) is a sin. Back in the days of WWII we’d just shoot those who refused to fight. Back in the days of Vietnam, we’d just beat the hell out of the “conscientious objectors” that were forced to join in a non-combat position. Others we’d put in prison. So, I feel America is much nicer to draft dodgers (today) than is the Iraqi Insurgency and/or terrorists. But, unless somebody can email me the addresses of the Iraqi insurgents and terrorists, they’re simply never going to have the knowledge to consider.
“Stop using Sex As A Weapon” –Pat Benatar, 1985:
http://jdemirdjian.com/Pages/sex_secrets_of_really_happy_coup.htm, Sex Secrets of Really Happy Couples:
4. They never withhold n☺☺ky as punishment.
Warning: "Expressing anger by never being in the mood will doom your sex
life," says Tessina. Why? Besides the fact that it turns what should be a
loving and giving act into a commodity, once sex becomes part of a couple's
power struggle, so much resentment builds that soon neither partner wants sex.
So instead of feigning fatigue or rolling away from your guy next time you're
annoyed, speak up and clear the air ‑- without sex being on the table.
I did not know this.
If I was a woman, I’d not want to “give away” my sex (dishonest prostitution), because it would be the only thing that values me. So, since sexual desire values a person, then open bi-sexuality should be our goal. If Adolf Hitler had sexual desires for the Jews, he probably wouldn’t have gassed them. You say: Mr. Critical, you’re the dummy because you can’t just make people desire open bi-sexuality. Oh yes you can. Or, I should say I can / could. The human mind can be made to sexually desire a tree with the correct inspiration / fad. Just like how that Topeka group can cause everyone in their family to make the biggest possible ass out of themselves. So, the desire to be with other humans (adults) should be easy (easy but hard because of conservatism). Conversely, if you’re a redneck, and your entire life has been instilled with not being with the same sex, you will not only despise the thought of it, but you’ll want to join your local hate crime organization. Very few are true self thinkers; although everyone thinks they are. “Dumb” is the best realization we all need to learn.
Many bisexuals go entirely homosexual simply because the standard of desiring just one kind (in gender, looks, size, etc.) is still predominant in today’s society (a phenomenon that the Bible says started with Homo Erectus). A simple new fad for being with someone who looks different every time, is the only thing that can break this problematic phenomenon (it’d have to start when we are young). (Everyone is butter in trying to do what impresses others: a strong fad.) Many other (more ape looking) human species all of a sudden became extinct about one million years ago (as Luke 13:6-9 & 2 Peter 3:8 directs), with Homo Erectus surviving. Obviously we wished to kill anything that did not meet up with our newly devised (via an artistic mind) standards in appearance (except extant apes that were luckily too far away in appearance and communicative intelligence). Us noticing carnivores eating animals, then trying it ourselves (the Original Sin), was a few million years before. We obviously continued to kill offshoot human species as we found them, e.g., the Neanderthal. The Native American is very lucky. The sexually compatibility is probably the only thing that saved them: Neanderthal was probably not sexually compatible (able to be impregnated). Actually, it was probably good we had the marriage standard when Columbus discovered the New World, otherwise the sharing of new germs via open sex would have probably killed everyone in the world. (I understand it did just about kill all the Indians, because of their abundant promiscuities. – Luckily there was some strife.) Today, open sex would allow a stable sharing of small levels of germs / pathogens for all our bodies to build up proper resistance. Colds, allergies, and many other diseases, gone. Allergies because our immune system would be more fit and able to be “smarter.”
By the way, our government really shuns the proven beneficial treatment of “ozone therapy,” while wholeheartedly allowing cancer patients, e.g., the option of chemotherapy which sometimes kills them. All I can say is that when someone wins to a position of power in our government, that also means they have won the “power” to place themselves deep in afterlife “prison” (Matt. 5:25-26) for a much, much longer period of time and suffering. “Assuredly”! – Don’t just take my word for it. Same with our media leaders. Especially after someone (anybody, or any nobody) brings it to their attention. I just help expose people’s true colors. I’m not trying to just be difficult for the fun of it, I just enjoy working for God.
Mr. Critical – Prioritizing words that fix the problems, making your acceptance secondary. So if you’re-a likein’ what I’m-a sayin’ then I’ve-a said enough on that subject.
-- Home (Index) --