Subject: The Catholic Church -- logic PROVES it’s a corruption:
(But then who wants to get technical?)
8-26-09
The fact that the Catholic Church refuses to publicly acknowledge my New Testament sex and marriage findings PROVES that it’s an evil corruption. If perhaps the changed meaning of “fornication” was an innocent overlook, and that Jesus’ order against marriage in Matthew 19:10-12 just got confused in relation to eunuchs, an HONEST church would have quickly validated my findings then would have made a major announcement that something goofed through the Middle Ages or the Renaissance. But, since they ignored by 6-9-99 findings and my further findings of today, proves beyond a reasonably doubt that they are part of the corruption, and are therefore no way in line to be “saved.” In fact, retribution “assured” by Jesus in Matthew 5:21-26 will be tremendous against those who continue to suppress the truth, especially for those who hold the trust of the people in their hands.
Matthew 5:21-26 (it’s simply The Gospel):
“Where do bad folks go when they die? They don’t go to heaven where the angels fly. They go to a lake of fire and fry. Won’t see ‘em again ‘till the Fourth of July.” –Nirvana, 1994.
Seems like Kurt Cobain is more in touch with Jesus than today’s Protestant church.
What a bunch of dirty dogs:
Actually, it seems like part of the official Catholic reply is addressed:
Catholic Sexual Ethics (booklet I recently pickup up at the Catholic booth at the Missouri State Fair); Dr. William E. May; April 26, 2001 (adequately after my 6-9-99 letter):
The entire booklet speaks overall about unmarried sex as a generic wrong, and how you should just trust them because they are the moral authority, then finally gets to the meat of the issue:
P. 27, “Conclusion” (referring to a citing of 1 Corinthians 6:15-20):

So, here they do acknowledge “porneia” as prostitution, but used a corrupt English
translation of “lewd conduct” (in 6:18) as the Biblical basis for their strong stance. First of
all, they know better than to use the original Greek definition; but, secondly,
there’s nothing in the context changing porneia to “lewd conduct,” which is
even just another example of a modern day generic sexual wrong. The context
has everything to do with prostitution. It even states that we are
“bought at a price” by God, therefore not to be sold. I just think that the
world would be much better off if all the liars jumped off a cliff. All
rational logic says that informed church leaders who keep silent and/or continue
the lie are going to be severely punished in their Afterlives. Again, no lay
person is going to be able understand Greek or porneia, they’re only going to
understand those they blindly trust.
P. 5, “Introducion” (“her” is referring to itself: the Catholic Church):
![]()
Yes, that explains it pretty well. I’m just the only person who has PROOF.
Maybe the Catholics should try to see the correlation between the popular “trophy wife” (“An attractive, young wife married to a usually older, affluent man”; “A specialized type of golddigger”), and a “prostitute.” There, they might be able to also see the evils of “lust” (seeing some as more sexually attractive). Of course, since they don’t have a libido, they’re not going to understand anything.
And, today there are so many babbling idiots out there that truth and facts simply can’t get through to the secular.
Informed Catholics today are going to say that they’re not going to inform anything to the public that will hurt the all important integrity of the church. Well, since the Catholic Church hasn’t been honest in the past and continues to convey the same lies, they don’t deserve the integrity… until they do divulge and disseminate the sexual and marriage truths of Jesus. If one waits until after they die, then it’s “too late” to tell the people the truth. I bet I won’t ever find one Catholic leader who will sacrifice their own selfish gain / image for the truth of Jesus. Emotionally, a normal dumb man would believe that his continued lies about the issue are what are going to protect him from Fair Afterlife Judgment.
Proof that Jesus failed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y1YL9C8Hfw
So, read here: http://www.last.fm/music/Death+Cab+for+Cutie/+videos/+1-KJmnLTiomnQ (Grapevine Fires)
Never before, but today: just “one” savior.
Once again, Fox News displays their colors against Freedom:
Fox News got added to Obama’s email list. First of all, I think the CAN-SPAN rule is prohibiting email blasts that are “selling something.” Obama’s not “selling” anything. White House talk about health care is what’s called “Freedom of Speech”; therefore, the CAN-SPAM laws specifically don’t prohibit it. You see, communism, Adolf Hitler and Fox News wish to suppress Freedom of Speech and Thought. Americans have died in the battlefield mainly to keep Freedom of Speech and the sharing of those thoughts alive. The only thing the CAN-SPAM Act stops is where a mailer’s goal is trying to get money from people, pertinent to the word “commercial.” The CAN-SPAM Act does not (or, knows better to not) attempt to suppress Free Speech which is exclusive to the sharing of thought, especially thought that is intended to make it a better world. Secondly, Fox News and anyone who promotes a contact email address on the news or at their website is “requesting” pertinent said emails. If Obama was spamming all the local grocery stores, said Free Speech might not be so pertinent; but, since Fox News blabbers a lot about Obama’s proposed health care, all Americans should “wish” Obama keep them directly updated.
This is just another example where game-playing Fox News cares more about just putting down Obama then doing what’s best for the American people and Freedom. For some reason, those who pride themselves most about being patriotic are really the least patriotic.
By the way, I’ve been receiving several of these same emails from The White House since May 13th, 2009. Some are from Obama himself and some are from David Axelrod. I’ve even replied to a few with my input. Fox News should do the same, to make it harder to ignore some of the points. (What I’ll do is when I’m ready to sell my old clunker, I’ll Reply with a picture and offer to sale.) If I would have received emails from Bush, I’m sure my input would have been much, much longer. By the way, the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 was signed into law by George W. Bush.
So there!
Now on to a more important subject:
What’s worse: hog warts or swine flu?
What Fox News is really saying to Obama:
“I’ll get you my pretty! and your little dog too.”
Question and answer:
Q: Do you know the difference between a catfish and a Catholic?
A: One is a scum sucking bottom dweller and the other is a fish.
I’m probably the only one in the world who can justly say that.
Fox News says Democrats are calling conservatives “selfish” for opposing health reform:
No, it’s just that conservatives just want doctors to be more readily available for them than poorer people.
Generically, rich people’s favorite justification for saying the poor are undeserving is because poor people aren’t trying and/or honest as successful rich people, and that one rags to riches story proves their point. They’ll think that their being more attractive, smarter, or who they know having anything to do with their success in “trying.”
And, if someone proves conservatives’ theory as incorrect, then conservatives will find peace with God by just ignoring the debate. Fox News spins that point so much that I can tell they actually believe their own lies.
Obama’s popularity is way down:
He needs someone who knows exactly what kind of change we need. Congratulations correctly goes to Fox News for beating him. Like I’ve always said, conservatives are generally smarter than liberals, and have the money to better influence it throughout the public. (Liberals are just closer to the real God: the one they don’t believe in, because Christianity is so corrupted. I am far above all of you.) If they asked “why” people disapprove of Obama (re-asking “why” after each answer two or three more times), they’d find that is has to do with the fact that Fox News has sold them on the growing dept, that they all believe our kids will have to pay back. If Obama realizes that the dept doesn’t really ever need to be paid back (via my writings), then he will have to eventually explain this to everyone to get his approval rating back. Of course, that would be a big step in the support of my logic.
It’s 100% a game to them:
Normal human dumbness is the reason that authorities and juries will convict you if there’s just “a” possibility of you doing a crime, when there’s no evidence at all. In other words, if they don’t like your looks or verbal skills, they’re not going to let a remotely “possible” criminal go (unless the media’s watching). If for nothing else to make everyone involved’s time appear not wasted. I’m going to guess that’s the case in half our prison population.
Proof that Jesus failed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zQQigo3IRA
Proof that I failed (so far):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mz0_x7313I&feature=related
My February 21, 1998 fax letter was close, but no cigar.
We all holler for peace, but only “one” has the key.
John Lennon said: “All we are saying is give peace a chance.” Easier said than done! So, now I say: “All I am saying, is give sex a chance.” But, is it possible for an “I” to have more power than a “we”? Only if logic supports it. Plus a hundred years (probably).
Of course, the logic of my February 21, 1998 fax letter just got it (eventually) placed in White House file 13. I don’t see any restitution being paid to the Palestinians very soon either.
“Too much talk, and not enough action … Now’s our chance to change the world: Change the world with love, with love….” –Paul Revere and the Raiders, 1968. That’s gotta be “sexual love” in religious acceptance. Tellin’ ya’all in advance – anything else ain’t-a gonna work!
How God works (the limitations):
“Things turn out best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out.” –John Wooden.
UNDERSTAND:
You do NOT get to touch her:

Instead, we appreciate you helping out for our leader’s personal pride and ego:

Look at this pimple-faced kid:
Protecting Victims of Domestic Violence: Don’t remain a victim, Office of Attorney General (MO): Chris Koster, (brochure I recently picked up at the Missouri State Fair), pp. 10-11:

This displays another kind of infestation thanks to today’s marriage / monogamy church standards; that’s never going to be eliminated.
Don’t you think the time has come for using some benzoyl peroxide?
How come we ain’t got it all figured out?:
I think what makes it more difficult for us to see how God works, is because our senses are designed to pick up in raster, when God’s world is functioning in vector. You see, raster is set: a single image of a result; where vector is more force or influence in a course or direction, and is like 4d continuous tone versus 2d half-tone.
So what’s “time” Mr. Think You Know Everything?:
The best-to-describe perspective is that “time” is all base particles continuously growing larger at the same rate. When things move in time, a “moving” particle creates a trail of where it is from, in the perspective of “non-moving” particles; so, we can someday look back in time. All particles “trail” back to the “Big Bang.” To each single particle alone, the trail is straight. Only from the perspective distance changes of another particle does the trail of the other particle create a shape. That’s also how we can have memory, as our brain can extract that trail data, where it copies matches anew.
Continuous changes in laws and bills:
If we’re so smart, compared to animals; smart as we all think we are, then why can’t we get the laws right the first time?
Claire McCaskill for President:
I really don’t know much about her politics, but the name sounds like a gettin’ things done kind of President. Obama’s tryin’ too.
It’s something we’ll have to grapple with.
Mercy for the Locerbie bomber:
If he deserves mercy, then American soldiers who do the same kind of thing (kill innocent people for a goal) deserve mercy also.
Because of incompetence and dishonesty reasons, I recently visited a new dentist:
Without me even asking, they gave me a nice discount saying that is was because I didn’t have dental insurance. I do appreciate that.
What’s probably going on:
I remember years ago alerting my standard medical insurance company how one of my doctors substantially overcharged their company for what I originally got quoted as if I didn’t have insurance. They didn’t care one bit. I think what’s probably going on is that rich people like paying high insurance rates so doctors can overcharge to match, thereby making doctors want to only serve the rich. That way the rich get the best doctors and whenever they want, cutting out the poor and middle class. E.g., when Mr. Rich Guy calls the doctors office, he gets right in; when Mr. Poor Guy calls the doctors office, he’s lucky to get an appointment in two or three weeks. If I can figure this out, then…. Socialized medicine would screw all that up.
Sorry, but I have to be for the poor because I’m a “real” Christian. It (the logic of Jesus) has something to do with “fairness” and that the poor are more needy than the rich. You’ll see it the other way if you watch U.S. TV, that operates on money.
I also think Israel’s violent take-over of the Holy Land is the root of both 9/11 and the Iraq war. So, when do the victims of 9/11 and the people who have died in Iraq get some advantage out of the MAJOR cop-out of the Jews controlling a museum (the Holy Land)? During the 1991 Iraq war, seemed like every time we’d bomb Baghdad, Saddam Hussein would shoot a Scud toward Israel. That tells the story much better than any U.S. media source will tell. The Goldenrule: It’s soooooo much the answer (over the vast / strong cop-outs people use against it). I am just flabbergasted by myself apparently being the only living human who knows this.
“There’s rumors of war. Men dying and women crying. If you breathe the air you’ll die. Perhaps you wonder the reason why. But wait! Don't you worry. A new day is dawning. We’ll catch the Sun, and away we’ll fly.... Are you ready….” –Pacific Gas & Electric (band), 1970.
Not until someone of high influence accepts my knowledge as superior. Maybe Obama’s failure will do it. He’ll have to eventually tell, or learn, that we don’t need to tax, and can just print up money for health care and all government expenses. Then just tweak the limitations (intelligence may be required).
Why does everyone think people won’t work unless there’s a “have to” suffering involved:
Maybe they’ve found that clerical employees work better “having to” squat all day rather than sitting down in a chair, for example.
Don’t forget to say something for the defenseless animals, Mr. Critical:
Who will God “save”? There are two kinds of people who go to work (in their subconscious): those who go to work just for themselves, and those who go to work for others. Both can do the exact same job, and/or make the same salary. A person who still eats meat after knowing the cruelty to the other kinds of creatures on this planet, are the kind who go to work just for themselves.
Mr. Critical – You’ve got your job; but… like Jesus did, my job is to make this generation suffer so many future generations can be happy.
TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/