Subject: Dear people who already know it all:
(Sent out 8-11-06)
London airlines terrorist plot thwarted:
I don’t want to die anymore than anyone else in one of these terrorist messages. Things are getting more and more scary. But I still don’t know if we’re more dumb or more evil. The only solution to all this terrorism is treating those Arab / Islamic people “fair,” and admit that we haven’t been treating them fair in the past. But most Americans will say that treating them fair would be letting the terrorists win. So I give up. Everybody is just looking at it as a game. First of all, we don’t even realize we treat them unfair. So, yeah, World War Three is coming and there’s nothing I can do about it because everybody else “already knows it all” and has “already heard it all.” But things just seem to be getting worse. All we are going to do is kill, or support the killing of, more innocent Arabs / Muslims, and never know why they want to do the same to us. It’s ludicrous, but it’s America (and the rest of the world). Every time the Arabs / Muslims explain why they are doing it, we ignore it, then quickly block it out of our minds, or realize what we need to not change so to not let them “win” the game. In other words, we are the true evil that they say we are. By knowing that and writing that, does that mean I’m more intelligent or just more righteous than everybody else? Well, I don’t see how anyone who isn’t a vegetarian by their own choice could be judgmentally righteous about anything. But, now, I’m having to trust all you morons with my life. Plus, we live by so many cop-outs that we actually fool ourselves. It’s getting to the danger point. Again, more aggression against Arabs / Muslims and the continuing never admitting any fault at all is NOT going to stop terrorism against us. Again, more aggression against Arabs / Muslims and the continuing never admitting any fault at all is NOT going to stop terrorism against us. Again, more aggression against Arabs / Muslims and the continuing never admitting any fault at all is NOT going to stop terrorism against us. ….
Israel:
The only reason Israeli soldiers kill civilians is because they are… “cowards.” Same with the Hezbollah. They know it is much safer to bomb enemy areas from a distance instead of busting through the door, then shooting it out with the enemy directly, from behind a couch or something, like Miami Vice. Now, the reason Miami Vice has to place themselves more in harms way is because the innocent people they would bomb from a distance would be… Americans. Therefore, since Lebanese, Iraqis, etc. are not homeland citizens they are expendable: The people of Israel, with their normal human intelligence and normal definition of ethics, would not drastically oppose this kind of killing. Of course, the United States fought in Iraq the same way. It’s all just a big bias game. It never changes; therefore, it’s never going to end. Again, the best way to determine if you should bomb an area from a distance, where you know it is very likely that innocent civilians will die, is to ask yourself if you would give the order knowing that your loved one (mother, wife, son, etc.) was the innocent civilian that was going to die. Then I believe that none would give that order. I hate to tell everyone this, but my philosophy will win in the long run, because it brings out the real ethical truths. But since this is not something that PhDs are taught, then they simply aren’t going to know it. I heard a so called peacemaker group on Fox News the other day talking how it is wrong to just kill civilians without direct military advantage (like we did in Vietnam); thereby connoting that it’s okay to kill innocent bystanders if its part of a direct military gain (aka: “rules of engagement”). I disagree. Again, if it was your mother or brother that was the innocent bystander, then the military gain would simply not get ordered. You know, after I’m dead and gone, there is a possibility of another super genius to live sometime in the future, where my same conclusions will be figured out as valid. I’ll just keep living out the rest of my life hearing the same old continual dumb, bias and unfair solutions that never seen to (ultimately) work. I think the first step is to get our very dumb and bias government and media leaders to quit acting like our actions are “fair.” You are all so dumb that you actually think you’re fair. You all make me want to vomit.
Each side in these conflicts actual believe that the more they hurt the other side the more the other side will back off, while every time each side believes that the more they get hurt, the more they will have to hurt the other side to get them to back off. It works the same way in American wars. And none of them really understand why the other side keeps attacking after being attacked. And people used to call me dumb. Plus, doesn’t everybody know that if they are on the other side of a line, they are expendable? Why is it that I am the only one who seems to know all this? Someday I will be dead then nobody will ever know all this again.
I understand that there are many highly educated people who just can’t understand why everybody in the Middle East hates Israel. I think it’s kind of like if I, hypothetically, found or determined that the land on which the White House sits was really an ancient holy site where I must reside or I will not go to heaven. So I appropriately took control of that land causing all who live and work in the White House to flea from my promised home. If they were “good” people they would surely understand and not resist me, and would vacate peacefully. I would be very, very generous and allow the President to have his desk, with flag pole and flag behind his chair within the oval circle I painted on the sidewalk at the corner of 15th and Pennsylvania Ave, surrounded by his secret service personnel. I would continually remind the media that I very much want peace, while it would seem the President and his staff might continually and deliberately refuse to recognize my great overtaking presence and purpose for living in my sacred spot, which guarantees me a most holy position in my afterlife; but, equating his support of Israel to my same valued religious purpose, he openly and in fairness allows me to control my promised sacred property without opposition.
I think there has to be at least one generation pass, where there is total peace which will cause a people to forget about an earlier conquering. If you still have just one old man that can tell a story of earlier harm and unfairness, you will still get a people to avenge his earlier foes.
Hezbollah would say no occupant taking advantage of the conquered land (Israel) is “innocent.” That’s like George W. Bush believing all occupants I have living with me in my newly conquered White House as not innocent. I see only two possible solutions: (1) Kill every Arab man, woman and child, or (2) give the entire Israeli state to the Palestinians, and move any Israelis that want out, to western Texas, since we like them so much. There, they can still be free from their worry of Hitler’s persecutions, but… would have to give up that living-in-the-“holy”-land-cop-out, and would therefore, instead, have to abide by the Golden Rule more. I know they ain’t gonna like it, but I’m having to pay lots more for gas now just so they can have their religious cop-outs. But I know the main reason that’s not going to happen is simply because a few American and British government and media leaders don’t want to lose face. If things keep going like they are, America will eventually realize and take prompt action to begin an Arab / Islamic “ethnic cleansing” (genocide) program where we will have to gather and eradicate all members, hidden from the media as much as possible. Just like Hitler, Milosevic, Saddam Hussein (?), etc. did. Of course, I will be the only one comparing it to those past denounced atrocities. And, of course, guys like O’Reily will be denouncing those who oppose it. Many guests on Fox News think the time to do it is now, since 9/11, since this latest London deal. “Or,” we can treat these people fair, but that’s not going to happen from Americans who don’t even realize we’re being unfair.
Everyone is going to biasly disagree with me; but, because of the bias / unfair standards of our ignorant, face-saving U.S. leaders and media, we should not be the country which takes over the entire world. I don’t know if there’s anyone else who could do it better, but we’re not it. Intelligent people should be able to concur that any country where corruption, lies and religious cop-outs are the accepted standard should not be in charge of the entire world.
I heard the United States was furnishing Israel with more precise weaponry, justifying it by that fact that accuracy would kill fewer civilians. So, are we furnishing Hezbollah with same for the same reason? That’s because the justification is really BS. More BS, and more I’m having to pay at the pump for it. Sometimes I think I would get less frustrated if I was just an idiot like everybody else.
Everyone’s an idiot. But the catch-22 is that since they are all idiots, they’re not going to change. Even if everyone looked at me as the new world moral leader, I would still have to repeat everything every day, or surely they would quickly resort back to doing the wrong thing.
It wasn’t really that long ago when the mainstream smart humans actually thought it was an honor to be sacrificed to the gods. That’s people with the same brain capacity that we have today.
A better way to find answers is to play out the part, or character, each speaking or acting from all angles of an issue, even the ones you know are wrong. Then, look back and determine which one(s) are the most correct / intelligent. Of course, I think people would still evade that one angle which opposes one’s personal bias. Therefore, personal bias, personal pride, etc. in the main culprit.
Weapons of Mass Destruction found in Iraq years ago but reported in June 2006:
No, no, no guys. You don’t just partly convey a false or exaggerated impression, where you just lie a little but keep some of the truth. That’s not going to work. To be a convincing liar you have to lie all the way or the truth will eventually prevail. Like I said in May, you have to like take one of our old atomic bombs, scratch off the USA text and write “Saddam Hussein’s hidden weapon of mass destruction” on it, and have it placed under one of his palaces or somewhere. Now come on, do it right: you don’t want the Democrats to win in ’08 do you?
Thank you America:
I recent heard a commercial that were Iraqi Kurds thanking Americans for the Iraqi war. If I’m not mistaken I believe I overheard it like this: “Thank you America. Thank you! Now we are free to initial our long awaited civil war which Saddam had so evilly restricted. Thank you America. Thank you!” I believe that’s right – or maybe I was just hearing between the lines.
Bill O’Reilly:
Bill O’Reilly should quit trying to B.S. everyone with his “sounds good” talk, and be more honest and just tell guests: “And I’ll tell you why you’re wrong: It’s because it’s survival of the fittest, and unfairness is just the way it is. So get used to it!” Sorry Bill, humans are the animals who are going to eventually overrule “survival of the fittest” with fairness. It actually has something to do with reality and intelligence. God knows it’s been “survival of the fittest” long enough – something new will prove to be better. Hey… slavery’s gone, discrimination against blacks is on its way out (because it was made illegal in 1964), so you just wait (I’m shaking my finger).
“No way that a terrorist that blows up women and children is going to be called a freedom fighter on my program.” –Bill O’Reilly on David Letterman show, 1-3-06. Does that mindset include American soldiers, since our troops do kill women and children, and mostly when it’s to our gain? I know, it takes a high IQ to correlate this. O’Reilly doesn’t have it.
Nitwit dimwit numskull thickhead blockhead dope clod imbecile moron hebetudinous dunce dumbbell dumbo dolt dummkopf nincompoop ding-dong dip goof fool mooncalf schmuck oaf ox.
During an interview, O’Reilly recommended American interrogators lie to Guatanamo Bay prisoners to try to get more information. That doesn’t surprise me one bit. But the interrogator explained that would only work once because it would cause them to lose their integrity with all the others. There are still many people that believe that minds like O’Reilly’s are the minds who should be in charge of the world. But, it’s because of minds like O’Reily’s (e.g., George W. Bush) why we have these problems.
Fox News is far from “fair, balance and unafraid” when they allow a member of their opposition to only speak once in a while. And usually they’ll have someone on who can’t really explain it right. They need to allow their oppositions to speak at least half of the time to really be “fair, balanced and unafraid.” 99% to 1% does not define “fair” or “balanced.” You see, they know that the overwhelming majority one-sidedness the public hears is what the majority of their listeners will believe. Surely we could have avoided many of our current problems if the other side was allowed to fully present their cases to the American people. Sometimes it gets to me watching Fox News, listening to all the same continuous whining, cowardice and one-sided points of view from the vast majority of their reporters and guests. Now-a-days we use the word “terrorist” to describe our enemies, to define how cowardice we really are.
O’Reily, don’t hold back on your anger: the next time you interview that “incompetent” Nebraska prosecutor, grab him up by the collar with one hand, slap him back and forth about ten times with the other, throw him back in his chair, give ‘em a disgusting look, brush off your sleeves, sit down, and cordially re-ask the question. That’s what we want to see.
Email me with North Korea’s gripe.
Flag burning:
A flag is still a kind of idolatry, but a flag that allows itself to be burned is more honorable than a flag which suppresses freedom of expression. It reminds me how Jesus allowed Himself to be crucified. Bigots who wish laws against flag burning are the ones who talk the most about freedom while trying to suppress it the most. Bigots: more dumb or more evil? If you take away flag burning, you take away the flag’s symbol of freedom. By the way, I’ve never burned a flag.
The New York Times:
Letting terrorist know that we listen to their conversations, track their money, location, etc. will, instead, make the chances of them trying it in the first place… less.
Iraq:
You know, if you look around a little on the Internet, you’ll find out about things like the “slant drilling” where Kuwait was stealing oil from Iraq that led to Saddam Hussein’s take over of Kuwait, which is the root of that whole mess. He even asked the United States to do something about it, which apparently got ignored. I never heard anything on the news about this. What I want to know, if the American public knew about it, like on the news every night for the last 16 years, as much as we’ve heard on the news about the evils of Saddam Hussein, would the American public have had a possibly different outlook on Saddam Hussein than they did, which prompted George W. Bush to invade Iraq? I think so. You could tell back in 2002 that he was determined to be the hero in this long lasting Iraq problem. Since George W. Bush thought that an Iraqi invasion would score him a lot of points with the American public for getting rid of that evil Saddam Hussein, then who is the worst evil? Could it be… the “fair, balanced and unafraid” media? Then, who would be the one’s who are “most” responsible for the many, and continuing, deaths of American soldiers? Who is American’s real enemy? The American media: more dumb or more evil? Actually, if the American media wanted to, they could certainly tell us about the “slant drilling,” etc. every night for the next 16 years. But, they won’t, because they have some kind of religiously instilled cop-out that tells them they really don’t need to be “fair, balanced and unafraid.” That’s the reason. Now, I’m sure the “slant drilling” thing comes up on the news once in a great while, more than likely real late at night, but not anywhere near as much as the connotations about how Saddam Hussein is “just” evil. Is there a reason why the New Testament says to not be bias (James 2:8-9; 3:13-18)? You all need to pray to God that there is no such a thing as God. You know, I think we’re only getting part of the story with these other problem leaders also. I’ll bet anything that the American public would like to be well versed on the whole situation(s). Would the majority of the American voters really side with well known unfairness? If so, could a lot of our recent problems have been altered? I’m totally aware nothing is going to change. I just feel it my duty to God to say it, to cover my own soul. Would you really like to at least know the solutions, or do you just want me to bootlick? You won’t do the solution, but at least you know what the solution is.
George W. Bush is not staying in Iraq so to help the Iraqi people. He’s staying in Iraq only because to “cut and run” would be admitting that we shouldn’t have invaded in the first place. These continued Iraq problems exclusively have to do with one man’s saving face. If George W. Bush cared about the people of Iraq, he would have dropped the sanctions against them when he became President. Saddam Hussein didn’t miss any meals because of the sanctions. “The war is necessary to fight terrorism” –No, it’s the actual opposite: the war will bring more terrorism, stupids!
To be honest, I think instead of George W. Bush later becoming a more honored former President, I think future politicians running for President and the public will use the “let’s make sure he’s not like George W. Bush, who led our country into the Iraq war for personal, slanted and then erroneous reasons, then not admit the ‘error’ thereby causing just more death and suffering for American lives, just so to personally save face. Let us learn from our mistakes.” Do you think that those people in that part of the world like us more now, than before the Iraq invasion? I don’t think so. I don’t think we’re accomplishing anything, but making more and more of them hate us. I think the more those people hate us the more chance of another 9/11, instead of the other way around. I think the best way for peace is treating other people fair, instead of treating them unfair, then using violence to escalate the wrong. The Bush administration and their advocates are now constantly misdirecting the truth, pushing that “it sounds good” emotional leverage, with their image of honor to the very limits. And, their excuses today are much more lame than ever before. They are strongly relying on the true factual stupidity of the general irrational thinking, easily brainwashed public. The public is so dumb that a President can get caught in ten consecutive lies and the greater general public will still trust the next thing he says. But, I think they’re going to go beyond the limit, where their ugly, lying filth is all everyone will eventually see. For example, to my above thesis, they would say that we had Middle Eastern people hating us before the Iraqi invasion proved by 9/11, connoting that all the people over there either hate us or love us, one extreme or the other, with no variable in-between. And, the vast majority of normal idiots will “just” believe them simply because that “variable” takes additional thinking steps, which requires the brain to have to work harder to reach a conclusion. A one step, one extreme or the other, thought is a much quicker, easier and resting conclusion. I think admitting why we’re all dumb is the first step in reaching “variable” and correct conclusions, instead of today’s fad that you are less of a person if you don’t already know it all. I think that our history of only learning from trial and error is proof that we need to admit we all don’t already know it all. You see, people will ask less question when they think they need to show they don’t already know it all. A lot of people don’t like me because I ask too many questions. Yes, I realize it makes me appear more dumb the more questions I ask. Where someone who doesn’t ask any questions at all gives the appearance of already knowing it all. Now, who’s going to really know more in the end? Sometimes I repeat the question later to get, many times, a different answer. In those cases, the person will dislike me even more because they basically proved to themselves that they don’t know as much as they would pride themselves to know. Sometimes you have to make a lot of enemies in this world to really know more. Our moral and judgmental mind is like a piggy bank: whatever money is in it is all it knows, therefore it would think that that is all there is. Therefore, it would think it already knows it all. Without correct instructions, we cannot help but think we already know it all. All we know is what our five senses have picked up during our entire life. Our minds can only reckon further with that limited information only.
I think the only people who support our President are those who still think that whenever a republican President gets caught in a lie or kills anyone, he is doing it to help the rich get richer, not to just personally save face. Or, they think that he’s trying to save face to somehow help the rich get richer. They don’t totally understand why, they “just” know they can trust his distrust. The rich who just want to get richer: dumb or dumber?
I think it is extra, extra hard to convince the Iraqi people that we invaded to try to help them, when we had 12 years of sanctions that only hurt the people, not the ruler.
How long will there be Iraqi insurgents?
I don’t know. Ask yourself how long you would be upset if Russia or China invaded the United States and blew up your business, and burned your wife and son alive? I’m guessing the rest of your life. Did I guess right, or am “I” the dumb ass? I’m also a-guessin’ you would “just” oppose their new government system even if it’s better. Try to forget that I’m correlating this to Iraq. Can’t do it, eh? Then try to correlate how hateful you are right now to people who have never victimized you personally. So… how would you be if they actually victimized you personally? Is this kind of thinking available to me for the takin’? I feel like the only guy who yelled “bingo” when everybody else had a bingo too.
Should we pull out of Iraq?
We should pull out of Iraq because we are the evil invaders; and, because of that, we are going to fail in trying to convince the Iraqis otherwise. But, if we pull out, the most aggressive and angry will take over the Iraqi government. Then they will grow and likely then develop weapons of mass destruction so to use them against us just for revenge. They would be very justified within the rules of the established “game.” Unless some religious guru comes to light and establishes a “never justified in hurting an innocent person” basis, that would be a kind of logic that no revenger could intelligently argue against. So, I don’t know what to recommend in a world where all religions, instead, stress: do this simple cop-out, or just think this simple cop-out, for salvation. In this country, the biggest cop-out is that we’re instructed to be good, but “Jesus paid the penalty for your sins” (therefore, if you wrong someone, you’re covered by Jesus’ blood on the cross). In other words, Jesus’ blood on the cross overrules all of Jesus’ commandments and moral teachings. That makes sense only to evil people. And I don’t know if there are more evil people in this country than good people, but I know there are more evil people who run the media and government, or the cop-outs wouldn’t be so popular in the churches. The catch-22 is that these evil people may learn from people like me that they’re going to Hell, so they will double stress there cop-outs because they know that a cop-out is there only possible way. Which, in turn, causes more cop-outs to be taught; which, in turn, will cause more problems in the future for our children. If I shut up, this assured ending is still not going to change. You can preach for hours about being good, but one cop-out sentence will retract it entirely! Matt. 7:21-24 [NKJV]: 21“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ 24Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock ….” So Jesus explained what I’m saying to a tee. He’s “my man.” With this big Iraqi mess / bugaboo we are now stuck in (when can we pull out, etc.), would now be a good time to gloat that my 1998 suggestion of dropping the sanctions against the innocent people of Iraq, then treat them fair, having been the best thing? He-he-he: Too late now.
Today’s Christian cop-outs are the cause of so much evil that today’s atheists are more ethically driven to oppose it. Normally / historically, the atheists are the ones who do the most harm. But today, they actually appear to be the “most” honest. The Bible speaks that the worst of the worst will rule then be suddenly destroyed / exposed. With all our Iraqi excuses and cover-ups concerning fair and truthful logic, with George W. Bush constantly contradicting his ethics and making constant misdirected excuses for the war, just to save face, I would say he might be a good candidate for the top Antichirst, and being it in a mind that doesn’t have the slightest clue. I think the only way George W. Bush can make restitution for the Iraqi war, etc. (including the deaths of American soldiers) for his own personal salvation, is for him to religiously teach the world that “you are never justified in hurting an innocent person.” He would also have to follow it. If others didn’t follow it, he could just use that as an example of someone who didn’t follow it. It is possible that the destruction of the Antichrist could very well, and maybe even more appropriately, come from the same Antichrist. Or, he can talk to Billy Graham at any time and get guaranteed salvation no matter how evil he is.
“Rules of engagement”:
The rules would definitely be different if the innocent person killed was your wife or son. Let me know how I’m wrong! I’m going to keep thinking I’m right until somebody explains to me how I’m wrong, no matter how much news I watch. One way to find truth: There will never be a universal acceptance of killing innocent people. There can (and will eventually) be a universal acceptance of the rule of never killing an innocent person. It’s like eating meat: There will never be a universal acceptance for animal slaughter; but, there can (and will eventually) be a universal acceptance of the rule to never slaughter another animal. It’s easy: you just have to ask your self what will eventually win. That’s even thinking beyond the bun. Same thing with sex outside of marriage, the gay thing, etc. Anything where there’s a victim will eventually lose. Anything where there is no victim will win. So simple to explain, but so hard for people to understand.
FBI’s “Top Ten” most wanted “nationwide manhunt” for polygamist Warren Jeffs:
Pretty severe charge. It’s even above a lot a serial killers. Jeffs apparently just doesn’t do as he’s told. Jeffs needs to get smart and move to a country that has freedom of religion.
Gay marriage:
I’m against it. Because, Christ and Paul both spoke against marriage. Christ’s support and then requirement for marriage has to be the biggest Church lie ever. You see, marriage is a controlling thing, and of the number one reward God has to offer, for a contentment that would greatly lessen greed. Even Americans who think they’re the more free, haven’t the slightest clue that marriage is not sexual freedom. Communism was strongly against free love. Sexual suppression and marriage were established to guarantee women financial support for their children, since God’s free method of feeding every one had been stopped. Therefore, I don’t see any advantage for marriage in the gay community. They just want it because it’s part of a game to get it. Marriage is on its way out with independent minded women, and effective birth control. Once there are cures for all STDs, marriage will go out pretty quickly (within 50 years). No, contrary to what I’ve actually heard, a woman is the farthest thing from being “independent” if they’re married.
Polygamy:
I’m against it. Again, more women in a prison is worse than just one women in a prison.
al-Zarqawi:
It’s great anytime you stop or kill someone who plans to kill innocent people, and any of his people who plan to do the same or support it. Though, I don’t think this guy killed as many innocents as George W. Bush has. Couldn’t you have smoked him out; then plugged him when he came out a-shootin’? Which way takes more bravery?
I think our President supports the killing of innocent people when we are on the offense, but opposes the killing the innocent when we are on the defense. And that can be back and forth several times during the same day! So there’s never going to be a solution. After we set Iran back 50 years, we’ll begin to “just” explain to the Iranians how we had to kill innocent Iranian people to help innocent Iranian people; and, then we will wonder why they don’t believe it. I think maybe it’s harder to believe a lie when you have been a victim of the lie. When you are not a victim of the lie (e.g., a victimless American), it’s easier to “just” believe the lie.
“It is always a God’s blessing, lad, when a man masters the worst of himself.” –Chapter 24, 21st paragraph, The Shepherd of the Hills, by Harold Bell Wright, 1907.
A burglar who carries a loaded gun to defend himself from a person defending his home, who tries to shoot the homeowner first, is like an American soldier in Iraq who carries a loaded gun for same. One is described as Indiana’s most horrific crime (and I agree), and the other is defined as deserving the highest of honor. If armed Russians or Chinese where walking down our streets after killing thousands of Americans, we would definitely understand my correlations. So, are we more dumb or stupid?
I guess that the newly developed Iraqi insurgents / terrorists are just making sure they let us know that we should not try to fight terrorism with terrorism; especially against a country that had nothing to do with it in the first place. Jesus says fight violence with love, even to death. Simply minds like Darryl Worley and George W. Bush (and his advisors) reveal the problem. One of the excuses used by idiots and conservative liars to justify the Iraqi invasion is like if some kid hit me in grammar school, I would hit instead another innocent kid for it. Until one burns the calories to examine the problem from all angles, including the analyzation of what we are and what emotionally moves us, and in what direction, the Jesus solution is the only possible total solution. But, the only way this vast world of idiots would be able to fight violence with love is via “faith” in Jesus’ promise of fair afterlife punishment. But, that’s what all church cop-outs aim to overrule. So, what’s the true root problem of all of this? It’s true that it is not a sin to implement fair punishment in this life as Leviticus 24:17-23 correctly states, but God knows that is does not work; therefore, for the only possible survival of mankind, God overrules it on the Sermon on the Mountain (see Matt. 5:38-48). But, that takes a two-step thinking process for each individual to complete, and that’s asking way too much. That’s why unhindered “faith” in fair afterlife judgment is mankind’s only possible solution, because it only takes a one-step thinking process. This is why I should spend more of my time trying to convince religious leaders, instead of using my time trying to solve immediate current-event problems. But, sometimes it’s just fun. With the New Testament, at least the total solution is at hand; but, of course, so far away.
George W. Bush – He could be a good President if he wanted to: he’s got all the right stuff to do it.
I even have better advice to inspire kids to not smoke, in a way I’ve never heard anyone else explain.
If everyone in the world was preached the true Gospel, without any cop-outs, it would be a much better world. I think it would have to start with little children: adults are way to “set in their beliefs” to correctly change. The catch-22 is that no adult is going to teach it to our children if they don’t believe it themselves. If kids were raised to see the true filth of evil / selfish minds, their later emotions will be set against it. How could anyone today teach kids this with integrity while practically all adults of power contradict this philosophy? How could adults teach it to our children while the best examples of evil would be the current power people paid by society to be the most trustworthy? Since the pacifist-teaching-but-harsh/fair-afterlife-judger Jesus Christ is the most powerful religious voice in history, then today’s paid power individuals “could” change to the ways of total righteousness. – It is “possible” (even though most people do tell me today that it is functionally impossible). Intelligently, today, we need guys like O’Reily and President Bush, to help show righteous minds the filth and ugliness. The more righteous minds grip, the more adamantly the evil minds will separate their stance from intelligence and fairness. The more they “separate” from reality, the easier like-minded conservatives will be able to see the evil. The more conservative minds that are appalled by the evil, the better …. Now, another problem is that this has happened many times in history, and what will happen is eventually evil will redevelop back in control. There is only one thing that can prevent this, but it is way to in-depth of a subject to get into right now. The Book of Revelation does devote three entire consecutive chapters to its demise.
Presidential term limits:
Our forefather implemented Presidential term limits because they know a face-saving President would do more harm than good.
My stuff is generic: Intelligence doesn’t recommend sanctions against any “people.” Just the leader, if valid (only when he plans to hurt innocent people). And, rescind any current sanctions. To be perfect, and make peace sooner, give restitution. I know, “no way” we’re gonna do that. Just pray to God that there is no such a thing as God. Assassinating a foreign leader is something a cowardice leader will not do, fearing retribution.
If I lived a thousand years ago, I would meet the same kind of people I do today: people who already know it all. I’m sure they would only consider advice via who says it rather than what they are saying. They would not realize that good ideas can come from just about any angle / person. I’m sure that the tone which it is said had probably 99% to do with their reaction. Hopefully a thousand years from now, people will be “taught” how to consider from all angles / persons of various experiences. Today “common sense” is only listening to those of influence, but in a thousand years maybe “common sense” will be listening to everyone. E.g., a poor man might know more about why he is poor than a rich man who already knows it all.
Today, we are “slowly” moving away from favoritism, simply because mankind gets a little bit more intelligent in every generation.
If I went back in time say 3000 years: no, they’re not going to let a nobody like me talk them out of their human sacrifices.
Wait a minute… I’m seeing a strange light coming from my garage – I’ll check it out. Boy, this place is a mess: I haven’t cleaned out this garage for years. What’s that glowing box over there underneath all that stuff? It says Sacred Mormon Plates. Hey, these must be that undiscovered second set of golden plates that Joseph Smith never found. I see it has a map inside. That looks just like Chesapeake Bay and the Potomac River. I am now receiving an English translation of the text. Wow! I better send this thing out to my friends in Salt Lake City right away.
Mr. Critical – Attacking problems from the root.
-- Home (Index) --