Subject: “Dumb”: it’s the core of our problems.
August 6, 2007
Boy, you all sure are doing a good job of trying to prove me right. Keep up the good work: I appreciate the complements to my accurate observations.
Deep thoughts:
When we torture insurgents, you know to find more of them, will we allow them to use the bathroom when they say they need to?
Well, something:
The New York Times refers to my emails as “organized letter-writing campaigns.” I don’t know how “organized” they are, but I appreciate the complement anyway.
Introducing Goldenrule-On:
Goldenrule-On, apply directly unto others. Goldenrule-On, apply directly unto others. Goldenrule-On, apply directly unto others. Goldenrule-On. Available within you.
Too bad the Church can’t be so annoying.
Olathe, Kansas:
When I began my religious / political writing back in October, 1996, I didn’t know that I was pretty much centered in-between the Geographic Center of the Contiguous United States (upper left, near Lebanon, KS) and the 1996 Center of Population (between Rolla and Salem, MO):
(Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographic_Center_of_the_Contiguous_United_States & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_center_of_U.S._population)
Leave out the populations of Hawaii and Alaska, and my house would probably be evenly balancing out both factors of the contiguous / conterminous 48 – you know, that thing:
Now, what’s “Olathe” mean in Hebrew? It means “The Jews Should Move to West Texas,” that’s what it means! And, everyone in the entire world (except the Jews) would think that would be beautiful.
To make it work perfect, there’s gotta be somebody we don’t like in West Texas – didn’t J.R. move there, huh?
A lot of truths can be seen in maps:
It shows what Israel’s been doing to the Palestinians:
Hey, that Dead Sea looks like a Hump’r Rump Pump. This map also well exhibits how it’s not to find a safe Jewish State, but to control a museum, accurately pointing to the location of contention (at the point of orgasm), which is what all the ruckus is about. If Jerusalem was renamed to “Goldenrule,” then that would be great if everyone wanted to possess it? But, no one would be able to “fight” (hurt others) to possess it, eh? I think today it would be appropriate to name it “Cop-Out City” – methods to possess it would accurately fit with the name.
For President Bush: an old Kansas proverb:
“When the chips are down, that means the buffalo is empty.” I hope it helps.
Remember:
The true Mission Road leads through FairWay, Kansas. All Missions, whether it’s from the Hills or in the Woods, should surround the FairWay. The FairWay should rule over all big cities, countries and the entire world; but, unfortunately today, it’s only above a Prairie Village. Kansas: it’s more than just for buffaloes to poop on.
Folks like meat because they have been taught that it’s good for them:
“Dumb” is the best word to summarize it. Historically, as meat has been more expensive to procure, people somehow think that makes it good, or better, for you. The vast majority of nutrition advice tells that it’s the most unhealthy thing to eat. (I know we live in an era where we’re going to hear it both ways.) I can explain it best: The good nutrients in meat is good for you (nothing a vegan can’t find), but it’s mixed in with all the bad stuff – something kitchens are unable to separate. But people trust the judgment of their parents and restaurants who have put it in their mouths since they’ve been born. Blind faith in stupidity is a major problem… for YOU! Yes.
Foreigner, 1979:
“I'm sorry to say, but if you wanna win, you gotta learn how to play Head Games.” “Head Games” is basically causing unnecessary problems in a relationship. (I could be a very good marriage counselor.) I mean, there are a lot of problems that couples have to deal with all the time, it doesn’t serve God more by starting needless or frivolous problems. Women like to do this – especially when money isn’t the issue any more – because it makes them feel like their sex is more valuable. They feel better if they make the man earn it. When everything is okay, they have to create problems. It’s a later spin-off from the Church’s pressures against sex – like a man “should” marry you first, support and feed you, be monogamous to you, or some kind of form of prostitution (sex / love for conditions). People are too stupid to realize that it’s all just another form of “dishonest” prostitution, so it’s here to stay, until something drastic changes with our church. Head Games is pretty normal: I fear most, those women who will act perfect (like an equal), then divorce you just because they wanted a legitimate child to raise (by themselves) – again, today, sometimes money doesn’t have anything to do with it. Of course I’m not saying a woman can’t complain about anything: I’m just addressing the “unnecessary” problems. There are lots of pussywhipped men in this country that will take that kind of abuse. The kind of abuse courts won’t recognize in this country, simply because they also support “dishonest” prostitution (if they’ve been well “educated”). If anything, they’ll call it “motive.” I think the only thing a court would hate the most about a woman is if she was a prostitute, or I should say, an “honest” prostitute (a call girl, hooker, etc.). You see, the courts / the Devil hates “honesty” more than any other thing. I’ve been told that foreign women treat men a lot nicer, and that American men treat women (overly) nicer than anywhere else in the world. Anything that’s abused too much may eventually blow, hence why there are so many domestic violence cases in this country compared to others. Guys, the only thing I can suggest is to look in the mirror and repeat ten times: “I don’t like sex anymore.” Psychologically, that will eventually sink in and keep you out of a life of misery and/or jail. Of course, that wouldn’t work with me, because I’m too much like Borat.
“Say You Will, say you won’t, make up your mind tonight. Say you will, say you will, be my guiding light.” Sickening. Yep, get a big mirror. Jesus / the Goldenrule is to be your “guiding light.”
“But how long do I have to pay? … Well I cried for you so long … I’ll sit here and wait ‘til you come home, ‘cause I’m a Fool For You Anyway.” Pitiful.
National Security Agency:
Them’s the folks who are recording your private telephone conversation right now; and, will listen in when you say the right key words. It’s all part of the Patriot Act (which just makes it legal). They can also set up something close to your house where they can record your every keystroke, monitor your monitor, etc. They can even see you in your house. They will even insert a tiny microphone in your telephone book, to hear when you verbally plan to make your next attack. You’ll see me talking to my telephone book, mail and coupons all the time. – Well, I ain’t getting any better conversation out of anybody else. Yeah, I still call a lot of it “dumb.” You know that filling in your tooth – a GPS device. Yes, theys-a colluding with you dentist (unless he wants to be audited by the IRS). Or, someone’s saying: “Hey… that ain’t a bad idea.” Well, I’m all for it if it catches the next terrorist who wants to kill me to make his valuable point. But, since I seem to be the only one who knows the base reason why he’s killing, then after he’s accomplishes it, no one will be aware of his rationale.
In 1944, I wish I could have emailed the media:
I’d have campaigned for the war, by asking them to print: “Men, get smart and join the Armed Services for the position of BA: bullet absorber. You see, the only way we can win against the Germans is to have lots of men running at machine guns, getting plowed away, while the rest finally get close enough to lodge in a grenade or something. So, when you feel those bullets hitting you, the key into helping America is to try your best to stand there a little longer, as long as you can, so the Germans will continue to shoot at you instead of others, just that little bit longer. Then we will be proud of you. That way we can “win” the war, so some guy who likes to kill Jews won’t be in charge, and instead people who sought to annihilate the American Indians (well, they were on our land!) can stay in charge. You see boys, those American Indians will cause a tremendous amount of future problems for the world, including endless terrorism against us, in the many years to come if we don’t kill them all; possibly even nuclear war with Iraq, etc. It is very logical that you die for that cause.” Boy, what happened to the good old days when we had the kind of wars we could win?
“Dumb”: we wouldn’t be able to have wars without it.
It’s hard for me to note, but I guess nobody’s totally stupid:
Everyone, even probably a fish, has a least “some” intelligence. Recently debarred Mike Nifong apologizes for prosecuting them Duke boys, telling judge that there was never any valid evidence against the boys, right after a 42-page motion asking the court to hold Nifong in criminal contempt, with sanctions, including prison. I don’t know if even Rosco P. Coltrane ever had to face that. I’m sure in this country, Nifong is a typical prosecutor, whom have no problems railroading people, simply because it presents them with no problems. And, can help a lot with saving face, to further their career. There’s no State prosecutor’s office in this country that would prosecute Nifong without the big press attention (we all know now he was an Enos). What’s the solution? Having the press detail the facts in every case in the nation (including civil)? No. It’s getting rid of all the Church cop-outs, and only stressing the Goldenrule, and Jesus’ words about fair afterlife punishment for those who hurt “innocent” people. So you see, there is proof that I’m crazy (for thinking that this could be accomplished). Phenomenally, then you’d have to wait a generation or two before we’d see the effects.
Lots of people like worshipping the Devil, Ozzfest, etc.:
That’s because they are looking for solutions to real problems that today’s Church doesn’t provide. If one cannot find it from the Church, then they may to go to “Satan” for satisfaction and/or answers. The sex taboo is the cause of a lot of it, and its base is the cause of 100% of it. When people start worshipping Satan, then they are religiously “starting over,” thereby determining truth by whatever suits them personally. Then, eventually, progressively, it will turn into the Goldenrule, then later reverts back to “whatever suits them personally,” manifested in today’s Protestant Church. It’s who you trust, not what makes sense: we may be dumber than fish down deep.
All good things have to come to an end:
If you’ve got a tired, overworked bridge that just decides to soak its old bones in the water, then you’ll probably find that the root cause has to do with the word “dumb.”
Teach them cavemen, and modern men:
“We live in a society where the individual ego and the group dynamic are in constant struggle.” Not “What?” but “That’s correct” or “That’s where the problem lies. That’s why we need fair afterlife judgment: Revelation 10:9-10 (allegorically): “9So I went to the angel and said to him, “Give me the little book.” And he said to me, “Take and eat it; and it will make your stomach bitter, but it will be as sweet as honey in your mouth.” 10Then I took the little book out of the angel’s hand and ate it, and it was as sweet as honey in my mouth. But when I had eaten it, my stomach became bitter.” The Goldenrule is easy to say, but hard to do. Jesus says it’s eventually going to happen, though. But, I’m having trouble expressing logic; so, yes, I thing getting the American leaders and public to actually do the Goldenrule, could only come via a miracle.
Revelation 10:7: “But in the days of the sounding of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound, the mystery of God would be finished, as He declared to His servants the prophets.” Sounds like it’s saying the Bible is not complete concerning “the mystery of God.” Like more is to come. Obviously to bypass Middle Age church corruption. Now if we could just get Jimi Hendrix to play it, someone might hear it.
“1915 Rules for Teachers:
1. You will not marry during the term of your contract.
2. You are not to keep company with men.
3. You must be home between the hours of 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. unless attending a school function.
4. You may not loiter downtown in ice cream stores.
5. You may not travel beyond city limits unless you have the permission of the chairman of the board.
6. You may not ride in a carriage or automobile with any man unless he is your father or brother.
7. You may not smoke cigarettes.
8. You may not dress in bright colors.
9. You may under no circumstances dye your hair.
10. You must wear at least two petticoats.
11. Your dresses must not be any shorter than two inches above the ankle.
12. To keep the school room neat and clean, you must:
- sweep the floor at least once daily
- scrub the floor at least once a week with hot, soapy water
- clean the blackboards at least once a day
- start the fire at 7 a.m. so the room will be warm by 8 a.m.
Old Sacramento Schoolhouse Museum”
Women might find more “freedom” in an open-sex society than men. You see, back then, it all had to do with money: fathers did not like having to raise a grandchild when they know some yay-hoo out there is laughing big, especially when they remember what they used to do with they were young. They didn’t “say” that was the reason, though, which is why today’s church doesn’t change. Then, in the 1980s, the laugh was on the other foot when the yay-hoo was ordered into court for something called a paternity test. So, do you good looking guys think it’s cool to make an ugly girl fall in love with you now? After the pill, in the early 1960s, all those notable attractive “loose women” where just being “Americans”: cherishing freedom.
My real name is the Goldenrule:
“I’m a wheel, I’m a wheel, I can roll, I can feel, and you can’t stop me turning. ‘Cause I’m the sun, I’m the sun, I can move, I can run, but you’ll never stop me burning. Come down with fire. Lift my spirit higher. Someone’s screaming my name. Come and make me holy again. I’m the Man On The Silver Mountain.” –Rainbow, 1975.
“I’m the day, I’m the day, I can show you the way; and look
I’m right beside you. I’m the night, I’m the night, I’m the dark and the light,
with eyes that see inside you. … Well, I can help you – you know I can. … Just
look at me and listen: I’m the man, the man, give you my hand.”
So, come to me now and take what is yours.
“One day, in the year of the Fox, came a time remembered well – when the strong young man of the rising sun heard the tolling of the great black bell. One day in the year of the Fox, when the bell began to ring. It meant the time had come for one to go to The Temple Of The King. There in the middle of the circle he stands, searching, seeking. With just one touch of his trembling hand, the answer will be found.” –Rainbow, 1975. Well, it’s one word: Goldenrule.
The melody reminds me of Molly Hatchet’s Fall Of The Peacemakers, 1983: “How many times must good men die? How many tears will the children cry, ‘till we suffer no more sadness? Stop the madness! Oh stop the madness!” Based on our history, an extraordinary higher intelligence is only the way. – The only problem, logically, something like that has to be outside of the box of immediate societal understanding and acceptance / approval.
One can get high on this music without using drugs.
Without taking my important February 1998 advice, government leaders didn’t know they were “Flirtin’ With Disaster.” And, I still don’t know if it’s sunk it. Notwithstanding, maybe it finally has:
http://www.javno.com/en/world/clanak.php?id=68191:
Last month North Korea shut its reactor, the source of its bomb-grade plutonium, and allowed U.N. nuclear inspectors into the secretive nuclear complex in return for 50,000 tonnes of heavy fuel oil provided by South Korea.
The leader of North Korea is probably already living like a king, so this oughta help the people. Sounds like the way Jesus would do it (knock on wood: I’m not going to research the entire extent of this N.K. deed). But it does sound like someone dug up my old February 1998 fax letter, and understood it this time. Just do what’s “fair” to the people of North Korea, or more. But in Iran, we need to create as many reasons (sanctions, bombings, etc.) for the people of Iran to hate our guts, so when it’s “ours” it will be like swimming in our new pool filled with our newly purchased piranhas; so I can later gloat about how important it is to follow Jesus wherever we go. “Ouch!” “ouch!” “that hurts!” “stop it!” “stop it!” –The sweet sounds of conquered victory to our best-of-the-best, great American leaders. I don’t see how we can treat a nation full of people (Iraq) brutal for 12 years, and walk in like things are going to be hunky-dory. “Dumb”: it’s the only explanation. I mean we squeezed the economic sanctions bit as hard as we could against the people of Iraq (knowing Saddam Hussein wasn’t missing any meals), killed many civilians in three major air raids, knocking out their entire infrastructure affecting all Iraqi citizens, and walk in actually thinking they’re really going to like us (“Operation Iraqi Freedom”). We are even still ignoring their original 1990 grievance(s). And this kind of thinking is just going to happen again! Especially after I’m dead and gone. “Tell me why the peacemakers fall – must we bury anymore?” I guess you’ll still have to, until someone spreads my writings.
There’s more: President Bush sends USNS Comfort to Latin America for free health care:
http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/news-2838--5-5--.html, US ship comforts Latam poor in contest with Cuba:
Communist
Cuba has long earned friends throughout Latin America by exporting doctors and supplying free
operations often funded in recent years by the oil wealth of its leftist ally Venezuela.
Now, the United
States
is hitting back in the battle for the affection of millions of Latin America's poor.
The White House hosted 150 Latin American and 90 US organizations at conference last month to
boost US social work in Latin America.
For poor Salvadorans, foreign aid is a welcome change from the local health
care.
That a boy George. And Michael Moore. Either way, let’s fight’em with good deeds. Proud sits my February 1998 fax letter. Eventually, leaders can fight each other by doing more and more good deeds for the other side’s people. See, Genghis Khan had it all wrong. He should have done things to make his enemies hated… by their people. That’d get him good. Grrrrrrrr! It could catch on.
Kansas:
It’s even the name of the largest city in Missouri.
You say, “Wake up, Mr. Critical:
George might just be allowing good deeds for the North Koreans, simply because they actually showed us they have working nuclear weapons; but, with Iran, since they don’t yet, he might rather just sit back and enjoy show’em who’s boss, and blast’em into smithereens. We won’t be stupid enough to remove their leader and take over their government this time, we’ll just allow our fly boys to have their fun, anytime there’s any kind of dispute. We see something on an aerial photograph – whamo, it’s gone, no questions asked. Since he’s a reborn Christian, he really doesn’t have to worry about all that silly killing innocent people stuff. He can just do as he pleases.” But, then, I don’t understand that Latin America gesture. Maybe because they are close. Of course, just doing good deeds for North Korea and not for Iran, wouldn’t that just be sending a message to other countries that if they want the United States to lay off, or give them things, to show that they have nuclear weapons? So, wake up. Good deeds should be to everyone, mainly to those with a need. Then we’d be worthy of being the only country having nuclear weapons.
Nobody thinks the Goldenrule means you can hit, kill, torture, etc.:
But, you certainly can if it’s stopping someone from hurting / killing an innocent person. Then it’s doing the Goldenrule / good-deed for the innocent person(s), making the Goldenrule to the “guilty” person secondary. There simply are times when you have to hurt someone to help another. And that is only legitimate when it’s between a “guilty” person, and an “innocent” person. And, the “innocent” person logically needs the defense against someone who wants to harm them unjustly. No, this is not stuff you already know. But, this is stuff you really, really need to know. You see, you still can’t drop a bomb killing innocent people to stop some “guilty” people (ones who plan to kill “innocent” people). Again, one is never justified in hurting an innocent individual, and only those who hurt an innocent individual should be hurt. Plus, you’ll later get bit by piranhas. After a guilty person is cuffed and stuffed, then you can treat them the same that equates to their crime, but it does support the Goldenrule more when you just lock them up for life, instead of, e.g., capital punishment. But I’m talking so far above you all’s heads, that we can’t even impeach mass murdering Presidents, unless it’s for something so frivolous, it should even be any of our business. So don’t tell me you already know it all. And, the only reason the Democrats want to impeach Bush is simply political bias, they don’t really care about justice or even really know what it is. It’s all a game to the individual. None of them even suggested impeaching Bill Clinton for bombing Iraq in December 1998: same case scenario. So nothing is going to get any better, or smarter, until someone spreads my writing (and I want to, and think it’s best to, stay anonymous. Or else I’d turn into bootlick / favoritism, and you’ll all have to rely on only my old writings.) Just disseminate what I’ve already written, and I’ll sent more later. And, it may or may not fix an immediate problem (like Washington D.C. destroyed), I just know it will prevent future problems. The experts say the terrorists can still get us in many ways, they’ve just got to know the same. Fox News tells how they can easily get a gun or bomb onto an airplane via the employee entrance. Hey, glad the terrorists don’t know that. Of course, I don’t think a terrorist could reach a destination, though, because now-a-days everyone would be snugly on his shape like ugly on an ape. So they might want to just consider the Timothy McVeigh approach (they can just ram it through them obstacles, or lay out a quick ramp and pretend they’re the Duke boys). It’d be a lot easier than just downing an airplane in the middle of nowhere. Me, I’m staying away from tall Federal buildings.
Don’t we all just want peace and prosperity?:
Ignoring restitution for a moment, the Democrats seem to want the Iraq war to stop. They want peace and prosperity. The Republicans seem to only want to “win,” regardless of peace and prosperity. Of course, the Democrats are just saying that because it’s what the people want: As soon as they’re in for a while, since money also controls their only thoughts, they’ll only want to “win” too, regardless of peace and prosperity.
Oscar the cat:
He really even looks smarter than humans. I can see an easy Ph.D. next to this cat’s litter box, if he only had the time, the money, and the communication skills.
He’s now having a temperance tantrum:
How come O’Reilly doesn’t blow anymore, now that I explained how animalistic he was? Does some of my stuff make sense? You could say he’s now more esteemed, meaning not steamed. Ha, ha, ha, ha.
If Saddam Hussein was still alive:
I think if Saddam Hussein was still alive, the Democrats would now be pressuring Bush to just let him go and give him back some of his presidential powers; because, he simply was never planning revenge against the United States. The Democrats might have known that with Saddam Hussein working with us, surely the problems in Iraq would be less / gone, knowing the obvious 2008 election benefits. I think George pretty much had this figured out after the November, 2006 election, don’t you? George is definitely smarter than most of the news people and knows how to accomplish his personal desires over the safety and welfare of the American public especially the soldiers. Good thing I spent a lot of time last year writing about the obvious benefits of letting Saddam Hussein go, or I’d just look dumb, or derelict, to eventual future readers. And my principal goal is to not look dumb to future conclusive perfection. Everyone else’s principal goal is to not look dumb to current people. There’s a big difference. Now that’s he’s gone, we only have “one” choice: restitution.
72 virgin wives:
Right after 9/11, President Bush told Osama bin Laden: Your ass is grass! Then we saw the lawn mower start in Afghanistan. Then Osama simply tiptoed over to Pakistan, while we were shooting it out with duh Taliban. I still think the best way, that won’t hurt any innocent people, is to drop flyers of 72 nude women (prostitutes) offered as a reward to bring Osama’s head into authorities. Aw, them Muslim males wouldn’t be able to think about anything else: a picture is worth 10,000 words. There’s probably 72 women killed in Iraq every week. I also mentioned back then, that this plan would not be implemented because of current strict sexual taboo reasons. We still haven’t got him. They are still terrorizing – which Bush continually likes to remind us about in Iraq. Of course, with news about us reneging on the Saddam Hussein bounty, thereby losing our all important integrity, it is likely now terrorists know we wouldn’t pay / provide the reward anyway. Technically, the media could acknowledge al-Qaeda’s gripe against the United States and provide restitution to those victimized, but since we’re not going to do that, it is still a Goldenrule good deed to kill someone who plans to kill an “innocent” person (which excludes any American in Iraq). The good deed is for the “innocent” person.
Sweet Young Thing (The Monkees, 1966):
A well developed 15-year-old girl who seduces her stepfather, e.g., via nude approach, either does it because she really, really likes him, or because she really, really hates him, and wants O’Reilly to get him. If he’s an illegal alien, then that would be O’Reilly’s dream. Sorry guys, you’d better learn how to not do what about 100% of all normal to high libido men would be incapable of not doing. Just pray to God that He gifted you with an “honorable” low libido, apparently because He doesn’t really want you to reproduce. So don’t! – And give future generations a break. Logically, you’re probably not aware if you have a low libido – you really can’t compare it to a high or normal one. You’ll just think you’re a “good” person, that’s all. It’s like my eye doctor once asked me if I had any trouble seeing at night. I should have said, “Let me borrow your eyes some evening to have something to compare it to, and I’ll let you know in the morning.” Otherwise, “Yeah… it is a little harder to see at night.”
“I know that something very strange has happened to my brain. I'm either feeling very good or else I am insane. The seeds of doubt you planted have started to grow wild, and I feel that I must yield before the wisdom of a child.”
I remember reading an article in one of those teen magazines, how The Monkees were actually more popular than The Beatles at that time, and that’s while The Beatles were still together cutting albums. (And they were the only band that did that.) It also mentioned that The Monkees, however, would fade away into obscurity while The Beatles’ name would continue to live on in prosperity. That was pretty much the way it ended up. Someone was pretty smart. The Monkees weren’t even a real band (didn’t play their own instruments), but that is those guys’ real voices, so what’s it matter? – Elton John can hire any band to play behind him.
Lots of people work so much, and/or lack the right kind of friends, that they aren’t even aware that they’re not supposed to have sex with underaged people / relatives. Sometimes, they might know it’s wrong (equating to adult premarital sex) but may not be aware how it’s very, very wrong / taboo. They’re naturally not going to be aware of that until they decisively hear it (from the correct people), because it first wouldn’t appear that way when it’s consensual. So, second time offenders are by far the worst.
“Where do we go from here, Sweet Child O’ Mine.” –Guns N’ Roses, 1988. I’d say first expose cures for the STDs, begin a Nationally Paid Child Support Program, and then implement open / free sex, then look to see who’s getting victimized from there. If you want to believe there are no cures of the STDs, then just realize that open / free sex should be our ultimate goal… starting with the Church. My prime goal is to just get the Church to be honest about what Jesus really said about marriage, the family, and open / free (no conditional sex / love) sex.
Oh yes it is, “properly”:
http://www.citypopulation.de/USA-Missouri.html, City Population: USA: Missouri:
Barrack Hussein Obama:
I can’t find an email address for him. That means he’s not going to realize how dumb he is. He’s not going to have the slightest idea about how restitution is the best policy. Plus, with him being “articulate,” he’s going to appear very intelligent to the people; therefore, if he becomes President, thinking he’s as smart as can be, he’ll surely do some stupid things that we will all regret later (and “later” could even be 20 years later). Critics will assert that restitution for Palestine, e.g., is not justified simply because the Old Testament says that Palestine is the Jews’ “promised land.” And, without my rational / ultimate / irrefutable commentary, no one will be able to counteract unfairness, no matter how well they can speak it. I do think some young blood might improve some domestic issues, while it pushes the Church farther and farther away. I guess we’ll all have to become such an unfair people first, before we can totally obliterate the Church and start religion over to restart ancient fairness wisdom.
You see, we constantly recall the innocent victims of 9/11 to justify violence against al-Qaeda. And al-Qaeda, according to their televised messages, constantly recall the innocent victims of America’s past aggressions, and they can use it to easily recruit new members – they just have to show them the past news and pictures. Al-Qaeda’s simply a “good deed” organization for those innocent victims (but are as dumb as we are). Al-Qaeda would reduce to nothing if it didn’t have factual news about how unfair we’ve been to Muslims. Because it takes a two-step thinking process to correlate that we are all fighting against each other for the same reason (to help them innocents), so none of us are going to get it. When one is articulate, that just means it’s even harder to think outside of one’s box, because they receive so much acceptance and approval with their good communication skills. When one is highly educated, that just means it’s also harder to think outside one’s box, simply because the wrong advice is so strongly embedded in their minds. Progress is not easy. Surely al-Qaeda is aware of the Amiriyah civilian shelter bombing, for an example. Possibly it just irks the Muslims so much because of the way American prides itself as being so good, fair and heartfelt. But I say it’s not just because we talk so big about how good we are, but that we actually believe it in our own minds, that makes us so evil. Watch any news channel for a day, to see what I mean. You few who are reading my stuff, realize you’re now much smarter than the highest of articulates and the highest of the “educated,” concerning the foremost important issues of our time – even if you disagree.
I recommend trying restitution first (but, that would be admitting imperfection, so it’s not going to happen), before going into the far reaches of Pakistan wiping out entire villages – where al-Qaeda would just tiptoe somewhere else; because we seem to like to give a lot of notice first. Or, we could infiltrate our own suicide spies to knock off just the al-Qaeda importants. Of course, once our Pakistani looking spies see their factual information about American’s atrocities, they might not be working for us any longer. I’m guessing if we invade al-Qaeda in Pakistan using our normal method, where we kill many innocent civilians, then I think we’re just going to escalate further problems and give more rational reason for people to join al-Qaeda. They’ll just have more pictures of American killed women and children to show new recruits, that’s all.
E.g., any surviving family members of the victims of Amiriyah, should be living like kings, or we’re not providing restitution.
Now, if we can assassinate al-Qaeda leaders, we need to say that we did it solely because they did, and still plan to, kill “innocent” people. However, today, there’s no way they could believe that, simply because we kill innocent people. Our integrity is totally gone. They would be fools to believe anything we say. Thank you George W. Bush. Therefore, restitution is truly the only answer. I’m telling you all now, so I can laugh at you all later, when you don’t follow my advice. And 9/11 proved they don’t care if it’s a new President.
Something we all agree about:
There’s absolutely no way we’re going to give restitution money to people who have killed American soldiers, or anyone who has a just reason to be angry against us (all others who would be a valid restitution recipient).
Logically, the U.S. will have to be physically taken over or destroyed before we will realize that restitution was the only solution. Because of the true hypocrisy of our actions, all we can do today is add more numbers for their side as we eliminate a few at a time. “Dumb” is America’s highest priority. (We’re so dumb that we don’t believe how unfair and hypocritical we are.) “Hypocrisy”: “The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess.” Like killing / hurting innocent civilians. We are so dumb we actually think the Iraqi civilian victims (and their advocates) are as dumb and in as much of the dark, as we are.
“Messed up priorities”:
Distribution of money: Iraq war and saving face versus bridge repair, dam reinforcement, tornado proofing homes, etc. You know, generically speaking, we cannot admit we are imperfect because that would be saying some attacks against our military were justified. So priorities have to stay the same, as long as the Protestant Church is involved. And it takes a high degree of stupidity (from my perspective) to believe that “faith alone” (not having to follow the Goldenrule) could be God’s message for mankind. And apparently it takes a one-in-a-million kind of intelligence to realize how “faith alone” could emanate to be the root cause of practically all of our problems today. But, it does not frustrate me anymore that I know it, and you all don’t.
Many times I think our government leaders will never be able to think in perfection, no matter how many advisors they have. All of it takes a thinking process (maneuvering outside the box of acceptance / approval), and things are usually concluded by majority of influence (what we’ve been taught). Advancement is a struggle. I think we’re going to also find that the “fair” methods will prove best; especially when there are a growing number of people who want to violently kill us to make the essential point. You see, if terrorists didn’t exist, we simply would never know how unfair we are. The information and facts just wouldn’t be there in our minds. We sure aren’t going to be able to figure it out on our own – especially when the Protestant Church is the one that really rules (in our society).
Explain to me why God would tell mankind to follow the Goldenrule, then say you really don’t have to? I guess that “hear it both ways” is not just something of this era. I know a congregational multitude will “just” believe you if you have a suit and a church, supported by a lot of money, but I would really enjoy for you to try to explain it to… me. Nobody will, simply because they know that what they will hear back will distress them way too much. I remember once casually chatting anonymously non-harshly / politely with some religious expert at a nearby county fair about the “faith alone” issue. He was good, and had several Biblical points / verses to support his point, each one I was able to explain in a non-cop-out fashion. After about the tenth point, he had to walk away from me – I could tell my rational points were really depressing him. Simply explaining the two-step realizations (redirecting the meaning in an even more “fitting” way) seems to be all I really need to do. But, again, all I accomplished is just getting people to want to ignore / avoid me. I like how I won the debate, but I really don’t enjoy getting people to personally not like me. This emailing is great because I don’t personally know any of the recipients. And, I can be rather entertaining against guys like O’Reilly who are still living in the 1950s. – He must have been very well educated in the 1960s. Hannity just enjoys being evil.
Who, what, when, where, why, and how, and more:
God is everything we know, is everything the universe knows, is everything we can imagine, is everything we will ever be, and even more.
Compete, compete, compete, challenge, challenge, challenge:
I’m better than you! I’m better than you! I’m better than you! Because, “I” took this picture back in June. Let’s see you competitive rich people try to top that kind of scenery! …
HIV / STD preventives are a thorn in the Devil’s side:
Therefore, anymore, few official information media about HIV / STDs suggest any. Oh, except one: abstinence.
Dee Iraq fubar:
What can I say? To just rub it in more: “Look out, here comes tomorrow – that’s when I’ll have to choose. How I wish I could borrow someone else’s shoes. … Oh how I wish tomorrow would never come.” –The Monkees, 1967.
You’re all so dumb you’re dangerous – just try to realize it.
“Epiphany”: “A sudden realization of truth.” Ain’t gonna happen.
RE: Bill Gates, Windows Vista:
When DVDs started to take over the home movie industry, how would everyone have liked it if somehow none of our VCRs worked any more? It’s just be “tough.” But, it sure would help profits, especially initially, for the DVD manufacturers. Anything else would be too damn generous. And, that’s tough if you want to easily continue the movie where you last left off, after you put it back in the player. Sorry buddy, you need to stay up-to-date with progress. Now, you can go to other beginning segments of the movie quicker: hey, isn’t that the best way to watch a movie? What are you, stupid? If we say it’s better, then everyone will “just” believe it.
Fox News reports that the surge is working:
I think we had a few days where no major revenge occurred.
Say no to drugs:
Pot, it’s just for weak people. Sounds like something a Mr. Critical would say.
Vietnam War… later Vietnam Conflict (to save some face):
Those North Vietnamese sure must have been a lot kinder people than Americans. Because, if I captured someone who dropped a bomb and killed my wife and son, I don’t care how much my leader deserved it, I’d institute their body into a fine piece of art. Later, I’d host a seminar presenting my elaborate work: “Ladies and gentlemen, notice those two rather large gashes – which demonstrates how one can create these fabulous designs while still keeping the person alive that much longer. You see, art will fade sooner if the subject dies. Therefore the idea is to let one’s creativity soar, while maintaining the all important sanctity of life. Notice how this leg makes so precisely a perfect arc between the buttocks and the foot. A perfectionist like myself has to spend a great deal of time creating that kind of detail. See the intricate detail where his eyes used to be. Nice, eh? I will now play the recording I made of him singing ‘Hey, hey, we’re the Monkees’ compiled by various pitch and resonant levels of screams. Now, before I work on the inside of the mouth, our volunteer will explain how he just wanted to fly airplanes.” Attendees would surely complement my assorted delicate values of reds, yellows, greens and purples. Now, if I was the captured American pilot, I’d share my keen talent enlightening my captors of the actuality whereforth if I was born and raised in North Vietnam, I’d be doing the exact same thing they are doing. They’d surely smile and gladly agree with me. Conversely, I’d continue to elaborate how if they had been born and raised in the United States, they’d be dropping bombs on innocent North Vietnamese civilians just like I did. They’d quickly turn their smile into revulsion strictly contending how I’m most certainly mistaken regarding the particular perspective. So I’d further specify how the core basis for their skepticism can only be concluded by their lack of superior intelligence, a gift for which I well possess, in such a way as to make perfect sense. I would soon be finding the desired results of my original plan to simply be very quickly executed, so as to forbear further countless torments. The end.
“I wandered through fiction to look for the truth, buried beneath all the lies.” –Goo Goo Dolls, 2007. Friend, you need to go one step further and analyze normal human stupidity coupled with dispersement of same via the power of trust and education / brainwash.
I don’t see any reason for all the Palestinian gripes:
http://www.teeth.com.pk/blog/2006/06/22/will-you-stop/:
Please, please, don’t show this map on Fox News. It is very important the American voting public doesn’t see this map. … Well… that could ruin the entire masquerade. It could even avoid an eventual nuclear war with Iran, etc. Gosh!
Michael Vick: Dog fighting:
There’s LAWS against it! But you don’t believe that eventually there will be laws against animal slaughter, hunting, etc. I (oddly) don’t see the big difference between appalling cruel dog fights (“a horrible crime”) and Ted Nugent hunting down innocent herbivores, animal slaughter, etc. I guess the best explanation is everyone is just an idiot. How come I can see the correlation, but the vast majority doesn’t? I think I’m simply a lot smarter than everyone else – anyone got a better reason?!?? And I’ve never been to a slaughter house. I think it’s: If monkey don’t see it, then monkey don’t know it. I’m sure there was a time when dog fights were not only legal, but state sponsored. I can see an ethical trend (or progress), why can’t you? I told you, the meek will inherit the earth. It’s in the process, so:
Why doesn’t the media air detailed reports about:
1) Slant drilling?
2) Slaughter houses?
3) The contradiction between the Goldenrule and “faith alone”?
4) All the free food that “abundantly” existed before “civilization”?
5) The problems in marriage (and Jesus’ talk against it)?
Are they all more dumb or more evil? I think they’re all more dumb.
‘Cause it’d, respectively:
1) Prove we were wrong.
2) Prove we are dumb and heartless (unless we “see” it).
3) Prove we are easily brainwashed.
4) Prove we forget very quickly.
5) Prove there’s got to be a better way.
Well, if everyone thinks it’s best to for us all to live in big lies, striving as priority to constantly prove to ourselves how we already have it all figured out, then I don’t know what else to say. All of my five issues are major problems which are in need of improvement. Then we can emphasis on making travel safer, eating safer, homes built to withstand tornados, hurricanes, etc. The smarts for all this is here, we just have to be able to solve all the problems caused by the above five issues first, so we can find the time for the rest.
Mr. Critical – I have faith that civilization will eventually reach that Smart Road:
-- Home (Index) --