Nationally Paid Child Support Program
August 5, 2001
There needs to be a Nationally Paid Child Support Program, removing the direct financial obligation from fathers, so we can:
1. Expose the truth about what the Bible says about marriage. (The Bible really says it’s better to not be married; therefore, the Bible is actually saying that fathers should NOT be the ones financially responsible for their children.)
2. Expose the original Greek definition of the word “fornication.”
3. “Guarantee” that all children are financially provided for; and, most importantly, in a non-degrading fashion.
4. Allow the exposure of cures, vaccines and preventives for STD’s. (The experts know that STD’s help keep “more” marriages together, thereby lessening “welfare” tax.)
5. “Allow” current and future “deadbeat fathers” to be able to visit and associate more with their own children. (Fathers that avoid child support payments, for whatever reason, will usually, because of their discomfitment, avoid their children as a result; thereby disallowing children to know and associate with their fathers more/better.
You see, nobody “really” cares if fathers spend time with their children. If social services agencies really wanted parents to spend more time with their kids, then they wouldn’t be advising divorced, unprovided for, women to get “two” full-time jobs. “MONEY” with greed, is the real basis of marriage. You see, originally God provided for the feeding of children, until society took away God’s natural resources (land, food, clean water, pride, etc.), so to optimize the motivating of people to “have to” work, to get it back. Therefore, “ethically” and “in fairness,” “society” should be the ones that pay for (or “pay back” for) the feeding of children. And, once society starts paying the bill for the basic raising of children, then society will “be able to” see the benefit of furnishing free effective birth control (and, most importantly, with proper/approving education) to all women who are still having all the “accidents” (unplanned pregnancies) – which they say most people are. This should also (eventually) totally eliminate the sinning abortion problem. You see no religious leader “really” cares about those “silent screams.” No religious leader really wants to solve (nip it in the bud) the abortion problem. Until the day that free birth control (with proper education, and religious truth about sex) comes, the rule should be that any unborn child that can feel “negative” pain, not just brain activity, should not be aborted. Which simply means that “the line” is “somewhere between the extremes” of conception and birth. That means that killing an unwanted/unneeded embryo is NOT a sin; but killing a fetus, that is able to suffer, is an accountable sin (in the afterlife). You see, avoiding and/or eliminating pain and suffering (and promoting happiness and pleasure) is the “real” basis and essence of ethics and religion. This is the standard basis that “will win” in the future; simply because God has “pre-programmed” us that way: When we feel pain and suffering, it is God’s way of telling us that something is wrong and needs to get corrected; when we feel happiness and pleasure, it is God’s way of telling us that that is what we are to pursue. The “bug in the software” is that many times one’s happiness can be another’s pain and suffering, summed up in words like “greed,” “covet” and “lust” (a true desire for only one sex partner). This “excessive selfishness” is where the word “fairness” comes into play, concerning ethics and religion; and “fairness” is (or, is “supposed to be”) the basis and essence of our secular justice system/laws, so “fairness” is also what “will win” in the future. Happiness for the hierarchy is today’s “real” standard. Police, for example, don’t really care anything about traffic safety, or they’d paint better/clearer lines on the streets/roads, especially for when it rains. Everything is really just a game to most people of authority, in today’s world. (I believe the above should answer the President’s latest concern about stem cell research. [I also have the total, and probably only, solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts, but nobody of authority will ask me for it.] Destroying an embryo/blastocyst, early, that doesn’t yet “suffer,” is like getting a haircut, which is painless to “human life” – the hair. Therefore, the Pope is saying that we should not stop anything that can eventually turn into a person; but that theory can be extended to include any woman that is not trying to get pregnant right now, as stopping, or halting or inhibiting, the process of a would-be human life. If the Pope really cared about saving those experimental embryos, that will/would die [anyway] in the fertility clinics, he’d send all his good Catholic women to these clinics to utilize all [impregnate themselves with] the embryos that don’t get used.)
A Nationally Paid Child Support Program may be for the present voting majority’s benefit: Say for easy figuring that a father pays $500.00 a month to financially support his kids. Then say that half the taxpayers are fathers supporting their kids. That would mean that he would have to only pay $250.00 in additional tax, because the rest would be paying the other $250.00. Actually, this is already going on to a limited extent in how our school system works – there are lots of taxpayers paying for school expenses who aren’t raising children; and few of them complain about paying that kind of tax; in fact, that is probably the only tax that has the least amount of complains about “having” to pay for; because it is beneficial to “our” children; and a Nationally Paid Child Support Program would be beneficial to not only “our” children, but everybody: because when effective birth control hit in the 60’s, slowly there became more and more divorces, etc., proving that, down deep, “marriage” is NOT what the people “really” want; until, of course, fatal STD’s were allowed to manifest themselves just so to lessen divorces; just so to decrease the number of welfare taxes that have to be paid to mothers that have deadbeat ex-husbands. Again, unless a person is really, really, really smart, they’re not going to know that IT ALL has to do with dishonest/brainwashing “greed/money.” Statistics do show that these children living with this “degrading” welfare stigma/disgrace (caused and placed via the greed of wealthy taxpayers), usually end up the criminals, drug abusers, and/or suicides. A Nationally Paid Child Support Program would totally eliminate the degrading stigma placed on the people and children on welfare, resulting in less future criminals, drug abusers, and/or suicides. Because of a corrupt church, and the lack of a brief thinking process, the wealthy are so stupidly greedy that they are unaware that the cost they’re paying for crime, prisons, an extensive justice system, etc. is costing them more than what they are paying in welfare.
Since the ancient marriage laws of Babylon, by society requiring fathers to be financially obligated/responsible for their children, causes a problematic dishonest form of prostitution (marriage), and a problematic dishonest form of slavery (marriage). The Original Scriptures denounce sex for money/obligations; and to be consistent, It also denounces marriage. And today’s society is screaming more than ever for more “freedom.” Requiring fathers to be financially obligated/responsible for their children is simply just what our limited thinking society has been taught, because it “sounds” fair and organized; but it is actually against the natural. Requiring fathers to be financially obligated/responsible for their children is the basis of many unnecessary problems. Fathers that care about their children (and especially mothers) would/should have no argument against the government paying the bill. If society really cared about what’s best for our children, then they would support a Nationally Paid Child Support Program.
I have no doubt about it: the people that continue to promote marriage, from this point on, are the dumbest and most evil people in existence today. – But, these ARE the ones that are ignorantly viewed by society as the “most” honest and righteous, but they are actually the biggest detriment to society today. Why don’t any of these hundreds of super-admirable/super-giving religious leaders/teachers try to “correct me” concerning my translation findings of the word “fornication”? The only thing I ever get back from anybody is just saying I’m wrong with no real explanation, and/or redefining their basis/support to another word (all of which I have accurately refuted). None, of these “most honest/righteous of all people” have even tried to detail, explain, or “rationally” refute to me “my error” concerning my translation findings of their traditional-condemnation-against-single-people-basis-word of “fornication”; yet (via the advent of effective birth control), more and more people (who would be church goers) are staying away from the churches (the foundation of the Goldenrule) because of their none-church-approved lifestyles, thereby causing more liars/forsakers-of-the-Goldenrule (causing more “real” sins). Nobody has an ethical right to complain about all the growing day-to-day dishonesties, crime, and ethical based problems, when, through a short thinking process, today’s churches ARE the root reasons for it all. If the true Jesus Christ in the true Original Scriptures had been preached in Truth for the last 1700 years, we wouldn’t have had things like World War One and Two, etc, etc. Church corruption (to help the rich get richer) IS the soul reason for these kinds of problems. But, of course, I’m dealing with a lot of religious leaders who are really what is called “atheists.” An atheist is a person that thinks they’re smart for believing that nothing created the universe; and therefore further believes that sub-atomic lifelike scenarios (spiritual afterlife) cannot be created outside of the apparent (except that our dreams every night prove that they “can” exist – the data and desire “is there” to make it exist). Because our entire sensory system was designed to only sense atomic material size data, atheists believe that nothing could possibly exist smaller than that; but our dreams produce it every night. Or, our religious leaders believe that truth and fairness would never have a thing to do with it. The Bible actually says that the few “God fearing” religious heads will eventually ask God if God wants them to be honest (about marriage and fornication, in the Bible), and God will *** surprisingly *** answer them “yes, you should be honest” (again, concerning the true/original definition of fornication, and the Bible’s censure and actual blaming of marriage). But that day has not yet come. (Personally, I’m not trying to break up people that truly want to be married, I’m just trying to lift the bogus condemnation against the single people that choose to not be, or are unable to be, married.) Many people also think they’re smart because their parents told them something, that their parents told them, that their parents told them, etc., etc., etc. Therefore, I’m taking on a subject that makes the 19th century slavery issue look like nothing.
Exists a church called the Church of Satan. They teach that “there is no penalty for sin” … “therefore, it’s okay to sin.” Exists another church called the Protestants. They teach that “there is no penalty for sin” … “as long as you ‘simply’ ask God/Jesus for this” … “but you’re not supposed to sin.” So which church is “more” evil? It would be . . . the Protestants; because a church that says everything wrong would cause people to “obviously” see their evil, therefore they would have a small following; but people are stupefied by a church that tells them the right things first, but then “allowing a way out” and even an actual justification for members who “want” to NOT “have to” do the right things. In fact, it is impossible to have a worse evil than a contradicting church that actually makes people believe they are righteous with God when they are, in truth, allowed (via “Jesus’s payment on the cross”) to not have to be righteous. There can be no better description for the establishment of the “Antichrist” than the Protestant church. And a tremendous number of people will ignore what I’m saying, proving to me that there is a tremendous amount of evil people in this world that actually believe (have been fooled into thinking) that they are righteous. This would give credence to why the Bible says that the ones that think they will be first, will actually be last; which also connotes a varied gap (Purgatory, for lack of a better word) between earth and heaven.
Some people tell me that this world is not yet ready for this degree of intelligence. Well… maybe they’re right.
Baring abuse, in a “guaranteed,” “non-degrading” Nationally Paid Child Support Program there would be absolutely nothing to prohibit a father to live with his child(ren), and the child(ren)’s mother; therefore, current arrangements would NOT have to change – and, if somebody could teach the world to live without jealousy and power/control games, then even more fathers would be able to live with their children. Jealousy and power/control games cause “divorces,” which causes the father to have to live away from his children. You see, “monogamy” is a “one extreme or the other” rule that causes divorced fathers to not be able to live with their children from that point on (and the children’s mother) after a divorce or separation. Therefore, anybody that supports “marriage” really doesn’t believe that fathers should be with their children. The only reason authorities stress that “children ‘need’ their fathers” all has to do with money. My local social services office admits they say that children “need” their fathers only to get fathers to visit their kids more, so the father will be more likely to pay his child support payments, so to save the mother from having to collect welfare taxes. But when the child hears that he/she “needs” their father, and for whatever reason, can’t have him (full time and/or part time), then that will CAUSE the child to feel that they have been wronged by God or the world, which will build up in them a feeling that will lead them to crime, drugs and/or suicide. The fact of the matter is, is that it doesn’t matter exactly who raises a child. All that matters is that at least one person, male or female, real parent or not, raise the child. Concerning the fathers that don’t directly reside, or stay daily, with their children, “I” have rock solid proof that it is very possible for children to highly achieve, as long as the child is taught that these situations are “okay,” and that certain statements from today’s leaders are “in error.” As a matter of fact, in some cases, with two equally ranked superiors (a mother and a father) under one roof, kids have a tendency to play one against the other, by receiving permission from one, to waive a restriction from the other, especially when being disciplined. For instance, hypothetically, if you had two generals of the exact same rank at the front lines in a battle, and one says charge, and the other says to not charge, then the troops can “choose” which order they want to follow (or, they’ll simply not know what to do). And if it is important to have “two” mentors (a mother and a father) directly residing with their children, then why haven’t we all suggested that even more adults, family, grandparents, etc. all move in with the children also, so to provide even more mentors/influencers/authorities/direction? The current fact of the matter is, today, with television, the telephone, the newspaper, the Internet, friends at school, teachers at school, etc., children have an abundant amount of people educating them about practically everything; and more about the “real” world (well… “more” than it used to be, anyway). Technically, in a free society, whether a father resides directly with his children should not be robotically determined by our current marriage and divorce standards/laws, it should be left up to what everybody wants, needs, or what works best. You see, some people are better at living (or prefer to live) alone, and some are better at living (or prefer to live) with others. People should be allowed to be “free” to be able to do what best suits them and/or their children. Fathers should not “have to” nor “have to not” reside with their children, the choice should be left up to the individuals; but in either case, there should be only one ruling authority for each child.
By the way, fornication means “prostitution” (“sex for ‘money’”) in the Greek (old and new). Therefore, the Bible states that “prostitution” is wrong/evil because of one “of two possible reasons: (1) Because it is sex out of marriage, or (2) Because it is selling something that is supposed to be free. But the Greek word for marriage (gamos), and all forms thereof, are nowhere in either of my, both rather large, “all Greek” dictionary’s definitions, under the Scriptural word for fornication (pornia), and all forms thereof. (“All Greek” means that the word and their definitions are both in Greek; opposed to our multitude of Greek-English dictionaries, which also overwhelmingly define pornia as “prostitution.”) Therefore, the Greek word for fornication (pornia) has absolutely nothing to do with or without “marriage” (gamos), (as “marriage” is used/the-basis-of the English definitions of “fornication”); therefore, prostitution has to be denounced by God/Jesus because it is selling something that God/Jesus wishes to be free and/or unconditional, which can even include the prostitution in/of marriage, which is, duh, exactly what marriage is: conditional sex, and a form of slavery and/or imprisonment to some (or many). Many Christians speak that Jesus’ love is an “unconditional” love, and I agree. And, no, I haven’t warped everything for my personal satisfactions, I am just proving that everybody else has. – I could have bought a lot of young (Nevada) hookers for the time and money that I have “sacrificed” for these religious writings of mine, so your cop-out excuses for not facing Scriptural Truth, and Logic/Reality, doesn’t hold water; which is what is called: judging only the writer (me) rather than what is being said, which IS logical proof of you all’s inability to rationalize correctly/openly for the benefit of the world/reality/God. I have been called evil, and I have been called stupid by people of authority, and I’m just proving that it’s not me that’s evil and stupid, it’s everybody else! You will find, however, some Protestant published so-called Greek-English dictionaries that say exactly what they want it to say (which further proves the dishonest/corruptions of our current Christian leaders), but the historics of the secular dictionaries are the ones that everything has to come down to.
Have a nice day.
Love (that’s Jesus’ “unconditional” love),
The Goldenrule (The Holy Spirit)
THS e SOM (THS\SOM)
The s SOM (Son Of Man)
Anonymous
Preacher
TH (The Helper)
TRuTH
(Friend of the little animals, and now friend of the little children)
P.O. Box 4035 (16403; IXL 304)
6-1=5; I+X+L=61
Olathe, Kansas 66063-4035
“Why they call it fallin’, now I know” –Lee Ann Womack, 2001
-- Home (Index) --