NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release August 3, 2000
Subject: Easily Brainwashed Society
Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. Pursuant to my June 6, 1999 News Release, evidently there is a delusive misunderstanding of the definition of the word “lust.” “Lust” does not just mean “sexual desire,” or “promiscuous sex,” or “sex outside of marriage,” or “sex in a one-night stand,” or “a short-termed relationship,” etc. The English definition of lust is: “an intense, excessive, overwhelming, eager, overmastering, obsessive, vigorous, strong, passionate desire/craving/need, especially one that is sexual.” Therefore, and to be brief, it actually emphasizes an extreme (sexual) desire. Lust is also a synonym with covet, greed and zeal. The Greek definition is essentially the same. When you are married, you are supposed to have these “lust” feelings for your spouse. If a person does not intensely/strongly desire their fiance(e) then they should probably not get married, duh. If my son came to me and told me he wanted to marry a girl, but when I asked, he would answer “no, I really don’t intensely or strongly desire her,” then I would probably advise that he should put it off; wouldn’t you? It is a fact that the Bible strongly puts down lusting, therefore the Bible is strongly putting down marriage/monogamy.
When you are “in love” (sexually/marriage based), that means you have “intense, strong, passionate (likely exclusive) desire”; therefore the expression mode of “in love” means lust. If you desire exclusive sexual devotion to another, where you really don’t want anybody else (true monogamy) then you are lusting, by true definition. Therefore, “lust” is singling out (or overly desiring) just one person for your sexual desires, thereby forsaking all others; which perfectly defines monogamy/marriage. When you get “hooked” on someone, it is lust. When you have “a crush” on someone, it is lust. When you are “infatuated” with someone, it is lust. All of these words suggest monogamy, or monogamous desires. Whenever I simply tell a woman that I love her, she thinks I mean monogamously – and I mean always. “Love one another” (John 13:34) means to just feel, at least some, concern/consideration/emotion for the happiness/pleasure of others/strangers/everybody. I believe Jesus knows that it is not realistic to try to emotionally get everybody to intensely love everybody else. When you intensely desire (lust) for an individual you are, in balance, lessening/forsaking concern for others. When you love certain individuals intensely, in balance, it is easier to hate certain others.
Lust is also discriminating your desires for only (or, more for) the slim and “attractive” people. Pretty much anytime you discriminatorily single-out your desires for any one person, or any one type of person, it is lust. Jesus’ “love” is when you don’t discriminatorily single-out your desires for any one person, or any one type of person; e.g., “love your neighbor,” “love one another,” even “love your enemy.” However, in this current society, if Mary and Bill say they love each other, their spouses would surely object. If I say that Sam and Jeff love each other, surely it would be heard as homosexual. If a male trucker tells another male trucker that he loves him over the CB radio, then all the other truckers will think they’re gay. In today’s English when you talk about two adults (any gender combination) that “love each other,” unless they are direct/close relatives, the term always means that they are in sexual love. But God/Jesus wants them to “love” each other; but Christianity, through the years, has somehow screwed that up. – Most likely when the Pagans took control of Christianity – did you know that the Christian’s Sabbath was changed by Roman Emperor Constantine from Saturday to Sunday, because “Sunday” worships the pagan god Jupiter, the god of the “sun”? And the term “lover” (which simply means “one who loves another”) always means that they are having sexual relations, even if they are related. In love’s verb sense, if you’re going to do some “lovin’” (which means “acting out or expressing love”), it almost exclusively means sexual love. If you’re going to “make love,” it is the “nice way” of saying sexual intercourse. Practically all variant forms of “love” exclusively denote sexual intercourse, yet people are constantly evading this obvious correlation. How’s your “love life”? – Well I’ve got five kids that love me – I hear that one all the time. Lust also leads to disappointment, grief, sorrow, downfall, frustration, devastation, calamity, heartbreak, recession, depression, etc., when someone leaves/divorces you or (naturally) dies; and God/Jesus does not wish you these unnecessary hardships. Therefore, do not seek happiness in only one person (lust), because it will also subject you to excruciating hardship and distress. Lust also causes unfair favoritism: When a person has an outside dispute with a third party, almost always their spouse will biasly side with them, right or wrong. This type of one-sidedness has caused everything from hurt feeling to major wars.
1Cor 7:8,9 – “I say to the unmarried and to the widows: It is good for them if they remain even as I am; but if they cannot exercise self-control, let them marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion (lust).” This is part of Paul’s allowed, “bending the rules,” (yielding) “concession” (1Cor 7:6) to marriage (which he strongly discourages and cautions). My point: “burn with passion” shows how “lust” fits/coincides with marriage. Marriages start having problems “when the lust dies.”
1Cor 7:27 states, flat out, that if you are married, do not divorce; and/but if you are single, do NOT marry! Why? – Because “such will have trouble in the flesh” (1Cor 7:28). – And mainly because JESUS doesn’t want you to become married (1Cor 7:32-34) – which explains that when you lust (desire to excess), your concern for “pleasing” people is much more limited/directed to your spouse, rather than the wishes of Jesus, which is to love/please one another [or “each other” or “mutual” in the Greek] (John 13:34). You see, the world needs more adults desiring to “please” the other adults that are not relatives; so to lessen/stop wars, crime, dishonesty, selfishness, etc. The world needs more love between the families – that’s where the major problems are. (Just for definition sake, the same epistle defines “Lord” as “one Lord Jesus Christ” –1Cor 8:6.) “What is proper” is to “serve the Lord (‘love one another’) without distraction (lust/marriage)” –1Cor 7:35 – More clearly: What is proper is to love one another without lust/marriage! Everybody since the time of Paul has been born single/unmarried; therefore, it amazes me how dishonest every church is that performs marriages, when the Bible says to “not marry,” and states valid reasons why. I’ve never seen an honest marriage ceremony where the clergy warns the couple that the Bible/Jesus/Paul says to not marry. How much more corrupt can Christianity be? Oh yeah, I guess the “faith alone” and all the other “sin justification cop-outs” – without reconciliation for the actual victim(s) – might exceed that. Any kindergarten teacher will tell you that rules without consequences does not work. Any “contradictions” to 1John 2:4 would be testing your “faith” (“faith” to not sin) to reveal your true colors. Hell fire is waiting to purge everybody that believes that direct reconciliation/restitution for the actual victim(s) of their sin(s) is not necessary. Does prophecy not foresee what will seem as a harsh judge? If Jesus’ crucifixion constitutes all our sins forgiven, then the churches should also thank/praise Judas for betraying Jesus; otherwise none of us would have this absurd “artificial” salvation, but just Jesus’ teachings/instructions alone. You make me want to barf: Jesus’ crucifixion was a horrible event, not something to be happy about … morons! Moreover, Protestant churches have actually documented that they will not allow “rational thought” to overrule what they want to believe – but I’ll bet you that when their car isn’t running right, they’ll allow “rational thought” to fix it. Animals even use rational thought (to locate food, shelter, etc.). I don’t see how anything could exceed the accumulated ludicrous brainwash of the Protestant belief: I think it is the ultimate/final “Antichrist.” Oh sure, to fool people, Protestants “say” you’re not supposed to sin, but they obliterate that imperative message when they say that Christ paid the penalty for sins. – This proves that the Protestants have accumulated an abundance of misleading thinking. They are “experts” in false impressions. They have succeeded in building the largest brainwashing organization known to man, concerning the most ridiculous cop-outs and lies that money can buy. They know where “the line” is that divides what the majority of self-centered fools will believe versus what they won’t believe. I speculate/can-sense that the future young children will be historically educated about all the selfish, lying, asinine cop-outs that our current religious leaders teach/advocate; so that they’ll be able to see the ugly, dirty evil that they will be taught/shown to not become, so to avoid these same natural temptations. Any ceremony, sacrament, procedure, prayer, practice, song, ritual, custom, etc. that conveys/connotes that reconciliation/restitution is not necessary, is misleading. It is NOT a sin (or, an “accountable sin”) if there is no human/animal victim. It would also be testing your faith if you believe that you could rob a bank, then became sorry for it, actually felt remorse, and go to “confession,” but keep the money. I tell you that all these change-of-mind prerequisites/rituals don’t mean diddlysquat if you don’t return the money! And if the bank later goes out-of-business, then that just means that it’s too late to give the money back. Waiting until it’s too late to give the money back does not relieve you of this dept. I tell you that if you have exceeded your time/opportunity to give the money back to the actual victim(s), then you will pay for it in your afterlife. Otherwise, everybody could, instead, “just wait” until it’s “too late.” – I’m certain the Protestant dogs would say that this would be okay; but Jesus says that you must reconcile with the actual victim(s) of your sin(s) BEFORE it’s “too late” –Matt. 5:23-26.
By the way, in 1Cor 7:31,33,34 the N/KJV’s “world” meant “worldly, decorative, orderly arrangement” in the original Greek, in Paul’s days; thereby stating that marriage is a secular/worldly law, not a law of God. The N/KJV makes it sound like God/Lord/Jesus cares nothing for the world.
“My heart’s on fire, Elvira” –Oak Ridge Boys. “Don’t know if I can ever live my life without you: Oh Elizabeth, I’m sure missin’ you” –Statler Brothers. “I would give anything/everything I own; give up my life, my heart, my home; just to have/touch you back/once again” –David Gates/Bread. “You can’t tell me it’s not worth fighting/dying for. I can’t help it, there’s nothing I want more. Yeah, I would fight for you, I’d lie for you, walk the wire for you; yeah, I’d die for you. You know it’s true, everything I do, I do it for you” –Bryan Adams. These examples describe some common modern-day “normal” emotional feelings that a “rational” mind might consider to be intense/excessive (victimizing) desire (“lust”). And these are just some of my favorite records. Have I provided enough examples to substantiate my point? “Amazed” by Lonestar would be another. “When a man [lusts for] a woman, can’t keep his mind on nothin’ else; he’d trade the world for the good thing he’s found. If she is bad, he can’t see it: she can do no wrong – turn his back on his best friend, if he puts her down …” –Michael Bolton; from a cassette titled “Favorite Wedding Songs.”
Now, this is going to take a high IQ to understand but people must have sex to continue mankind, and the Bible says it’s better for all single people to not marry (1Cor 7), therefore THE BIBLE (not Playboy Magazine) is saying that it is better to have sex out of marriage! Now that takes a three (3) step thinking process to understand so most of you aren’t going to get it. And again, “fornication” in the original Greek meant/means “prostitution” (“sex for MONEY”). (I needed it to “show me the money” and it did.) And any man that is not pussy-whipped, and any woman that is honest will concur that marriage is dishonest prostitution and/or “lust” (intense/excessive desire). Honest prostitution is illegal in my society, but “dishonest prostitution” is not only recommended by our modern day churches (and society), but is required by our modern day churches, when it pertains to having sex. And this society is so easily brainwashed and gullible when facing people with charm, personality and popularity (idolatry) that they believe whatever the corrupt (and/or another easily brainwashed) person says instead of what the Bible says. Now, because the human mind has a great deal of difficulty judging/thinking between the extremes, I shall reiterate: Not everything these churches teach/convey is false – I’m just trying to correct the particular (but very important) lies, misconceptions and cop-outs.
“What the world needs now is love, sweet love” –Dionne Warwick. “Love is the Answer” –England Dan & John Ford Coley. “Love one another” –Jesus Christ. Because of the obvious fact that most of the world’s problems derive from a lack of love between people, a lot of people (especially the Biblical Jesus) agree that the world needs more love between people. In other words, not a love that is limited to just your spouse, kids, parents, close friends, etc.; but a love between the “other” people. When society takes away, or suppresses (in marriage), the only universal reason for people to do, and be able to do, “pleasing” (lCor 7:32-34) things (sex) to each other, then you end up with the apathetic world that we live in (concerning the emotional degree that people desire to please and not hurt others). When someone has nothing to offer another, then the other person will find little or no interest in them; and, in due course, will become much more bitter and condemning if there is a/any problem/dispute between the two. Sex (or I should say “open sex”) is the only pure, true, and healthy love building tool/drug, that is available free, that is able to create/cause a total “Jesus Christ, peace, love, brotherhood-of-man” world. No modern day church has been able to even come close to this goal. If a person knew that they would/could be allowed to have consensual sex with a person that they normally would not be able to (or would feel guilty about it, as this society teaches), then they would know that everybody has, at least, something pleasing to offer them. This subconscious knowledge alone would reduce that apathetic feelings now caused by today’s overwhelming religions that support/demand marriage; which, again, the Bible recommends against (1Cor 7). Oh sure, a few (like Mother Teresa) have a big heart for the need for charity, but most people naturally don’t. Therefore, there has to be a tool, something “real,” that tangibly creates a better, more loving world. Attestant to this is the emotions/actions of males in practically all wars. Men historically have called-the-shots when it comes to war. For example, William Quantrill ordered his men to kill every male (old and young) when his men destroyed Lawrence, Kansas in 1863; but his orders were also to make certain that absolutely no females were killed, or you would have to answer to Quantrill later. The Battle of Lexington, Missouri 1861: Wives were sent to a captured spring to get water for the three-day trapped/surrounded Federals, because everybody knew that soldiers will not harm women. The Confederates allowed these women to drink their fill, but would not permit them to carry water back to their thirsty men. There are even cases where battles were temporarily halted, so to allow the women the move to safety. I’m sure that now and then there are exceptions to this, but the point I’m trying to make, is that since woman have at least something pleasing (sex) to offer a man, even when he hasn’t had (and probably won’t end up having) sex with her, emotionally and subconsciously instilled, he strongly desires to not hurt her. No, domestic violence is CAUSED by the jealousy, co-dependency, and the prisonlike control of marriage/monogamy. A totally bi-sexual world would eventually cause a totally peaceful world; because just the slightest sexual desire for another/a-stranger would be all that is needed, so “put a little love in your heart; and the world will be a better place; for you, and me, you just wait and see …” –Jackie DeShannon. More balanced love, because “[lust] stinks” –J. Geils Band. Extremely high and in-depth logical reasoning concludes that open sex is the only hope. Most people aren’t even able to think/reason at that high of a level, and the one’s that can, find no “immediate” benefit; other than a true desire to serve God.
Scientists talk about a “gay gene,” but can’t explain why gay people have straight parents and straight grandparents, etc. The fact is, the human mind is capable of getting turned-on by looking at a tree, if it sets its mind to it (or, is taught to desire that). And it is even easier (and advantageous) to sexually desire the same sex of another human because you can actually feel their pleasure (and/or “would be” pleasure) which will escalate yours. Example: People like becoming oral on another not necessarily because it makes the mouth feel better (i.e., nobody masturbates their mouth), but because it makes the receiver feel better, and the giver can actually feel part of the pleasure/sensation that the receiver is feeling. They actually enjoy the “idea” of it. Therefore, what better of a “love building” tool do we have? All other “love building” tools and ideas simply have not worked, or have not worked good enough. Sex is the most mutually pleasing tool that mankind has to fight real evil. I have personally found that sex is better when I go from an attractive person to an unattractive person, to a slim person to an overweight person, etc. People would get sick and tired of eating the same meal in the same restaurant every night, but they are not smart enough to see the benefit in having a variety of sex partners, that have a variety of looks/sizes. Scientists have found that men will actually ejaculate more sperm (from the normal 100 million to about 500-600 million) in these more excitable conditions, which proportionately provides substantially increased orgasm pleasure. Non-monogamous, non-looks-discriminative, (and “free”) open bi-sexuality is the only hope for mankind.
The “great commandment” of Matt. 22:37 essentially says to build, create, organize, sing, play, teach, etc. with/for God (who/which should be looked at as everything within your five senses); but Matt. 22:39 says we must do it in fairness. It is difficult (but not impossible) for the human mind to reason between the extremes of no desire and total lust/greed. It is difficult to understand the word “fair.” For example, do women think it’s fair that a man can have sex on a first date, but a woman can’t? Males are much more “society allowed” to be naturally promiscuous; but females are more unfairly brainwash imbedded to settle for and/or desire prerequisites to sex, and minimal partners. This is women’s taught/acquired desire/requirement only; not their free, natural desire. Women would enjoy promiscuous sex as much as men if society allowed their minds to be free – (imbecilic and dishonest women/people will disagree with this). But if ship-wrecked five-year-olds, hypothetically, grew up on a deserted island, away from societies influence (say their parents perished in the wreck); when they became of age, they would all naturally and happily have promiscuous sex without reservations or feeling of guilt and shame. And, as long as they had the natural means of feeding themselves, and/or had effective birth control (say they found some on their wrecked ship), their promiscuities would never cause any kind of problems. And say if they had prior knowledge of bows and arrows, they could efficiently defend themselves against predators. Our livelong embedded control-of-sex brainwash began in our childhood, when we were first taught that we should not be unclothed in public. This is something, for example, that we all naturally don’t know until we have been instructed. When we go through puberty, then we learn “the rules.”
It is very clear to me how easily brainwashed the human mind can be, when you analyze why men will march a thousand miles so they can run to their excruciating death in battle. Plus, I’m certainly not going to kill anybody just because somebody tells me to. Even if I look at it from a moron’s point of view, there’s still a 50% chance that I could be fighting on the wrong side; which would make me part of the unjustifiable evil. But from my superior position, I see it as very likely that both sides are in the wrong: that these situations have just escalated (via killing/wronging each other’s innocent people) to the point of war. People’s adamant self-deceptions of their own wrongs/mistakes/escalations are many times the forerunners to war. And if everybody saw it my way, nobody would show up to do all the fighting to satisfy the leaders’ pride, ego, anger, greed, etc. And the mindless hypocrisy: Since World War Two, Americans say “despicable” concerning Hitler’s truly despicable prejudice treatment/persecution against the Jews, but it wasn’t that long ago when Americans said “the only good Indian is a dead Indian,” during America’s truly despicable, Indian slaughter campaigns of the latter 1800’s. And even with today’s (truly righteous) anti-discrimination laws, many Americans still have an ignorant/incompetent prejudice against Blacks.
Another major brainwash example: Did you know that statistics show that eating meat (which is really not addictive) is as bad for your health as smoking (which is very addictive), yet most people think they’re smart by eating meat. According to Neal Barnard, M.D., president of the Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, D.C.: “Biology seems to indicate that we aren’t meant to eat meat. We might be used to it, or like it, but it is an acquired taste. When we trick ourselves into becoming carnivores, our body rebels against it [an ‘acidic intestinal environment,’ that upsets the reign of our ‘good bacteria’ and allows the overgrowth of ‘bad bacteria,’ which give off cancer-causing toxins]. A meat eater is three times as likely to get cancer as a vegetarian. Heart disease risks go up astronomically, and your diabetes risk is multiplied by a factor of about three. It is the equivalent of putting diesel fuel into a car that requires unleaded. We do not have ‘canine teeth,’ as does a dog or cat. We are designed for picking fruit or leaves, since we have fingers instead of claws. Humans have a long colon [4 times the length of a carnivore] which is designed for pulling excess water out of plant refuse. When we have meat sitting around in there, we get colon cancer. Conversely, carnivores have a very short colon because they need to eject the digested product of animal remains [before it rots – which ‘circulates toxins through the bloodstream’]. We now know that all meat (including chicken and fish) are the worst protein sources from the standpoint of your overall health.” There are many other articles and books, that I have, that state these same statistics, and more: (My fellow) weight-lifters/protein-enthusiasts should realize that the stronger animals are the vegetarians; such as stallions, oxen, bulls, elephants, gorillas, etc. The carnivores aren’t strong, they’re just evil – their sub-DNA self-improvement directives have evolved to support their selfish evil, that’s all. What makes the fictional werewolf and vampires so scary/evil is because they are humans with canine teeth – take away the canine teeth and nobody would be scared. Barring the brainwash, our taste buds actually sense a lot more, and would better enjoy the vast varieties of naturally pleasing flavors from fruits and vegetables, that don’t need to be “covered up”: I look at meat as more of just “a filler” to the spices, sauces, vegetables, etc. that adds the real taste. The reason we cook meat is because people actually prefer the “burnt/heated” taste over the natural real taste of flesh – it’s that bad. And people are rightfully appalled/sickened when they taste the flesh of an animal that they are not “brainwashed” to enjoy; like dog, horse, spider, roach, mouse, “chilled monkey brains,” slug, etc. Oh yeah, the (advertised) “good nutrients” in meat is good for you; but the problem is, it is mixed in with the bad nutrients also; which kitchens can not separate. All meats (flesh) have something biologically harmful; while (basically) all fruits and vegetables contain nothing bad for you. And, since I became a vegetarian, I can assert that my stools even appear noticeably healthier. And there is, of course, the ethical reason; but most religious leaders could care less how animals feel when being hunted, shot, slaughtered, etc.; but if there is only one God, then God cares. Watch Jurassic Park so you can understand how and why it might be considered evil (in a “rational” person’s mind) if a T-Rex hunted, chased and ate you! Plus, the EPA says that 90% to 95% of consumed pesticides comes from meat/eggs/dairy. Plus, we are also losing the beneficial effects of antibiotics when we consume the high doses of antibiotics that are heavily fed to animals.
We live in a very erroneous, easily brainwashed, and dishonest society, which I blame on the corrupt churches. Very rarely do I even find someone that will admit to their lies/wrongs or even errors, unless completely caught “red-handed.” I have found that the people that are “above average charmers” are the one’s that can be trusted the least, especially when it counts; but, if they’re good at it, which they are or they wouldn’t do it, then those are the ones that are trusted the most from the vast majority of the easily fooled public. A super genius would have to go along with societies lies/brainwash or they will become an outcast (like Jesus was).
The fornication/marriage sex lie is by far the biggest and most profound lie ever. The magnitude of its complexity can be seen by the number of people that are married. There could be no larger issue that could functionally and realistically bring about the foretold and certain Apocalypse. My advice: the same as Paul’s (1Cor 7:27): because of the current social financial complexities, married people should stay together, but single people should begin to be logically encouraged to avoid marriage. The vast number of prophesied close-minded opposers will eventually die out, to eventually allow the promised “Heaven on earth.” People will be much happier, safer, and even more enthusiastically productive in their work (any sports team will tell you that working together [when it can be satisfactorily had] works much better than working against each other). I have been informed that a lot of religious pastors/teachers are aware of the fornication/marriage lies, but fear losing their jobs/careers, from their superiors, if they publicly speak these truths. The superior religious leaders should be aware that for every second they delay the (full) public announcement of these sexual truths to their people/congregation(s), they WILL suffer just that much more in afterlife judgment; and I can assure them that no cop-out, ritual, prayer, or their position – nor their “other” good deeds – will get them out of it. They need to realize that the dictionary definition of a lie is not only “to speak a false statement” but it is also “to convey a false impression, knowingly, with the intent to deceive.” And “to convey” can mean “just saying nothing.” Therefore, a lie can include ignoring, or not correcting, a false belief. When you have knowledge that someone else is seeing something falsely, or has learned something in error, and you allow them to continue to believe incorrectly, you are lying!
If a politician could present a realistic plan to “really” lower taxes, and I mean a lot; and halt the entire abortion problem; then he/she would have no problem becoming President: A lot of our tax dollars goes to welfare recipients who are single/divorced women that are raising children. Believe it or not, taxpayers would be better off if the government/society discouraged/stopped marriages, and distributed free birth control to all women (especially the poor women) along with proper birth control education. Then there would be a great deal less unwanted pregnancies. This would be a relatively small investment that would greatly pay off in saved welfare taxes. This would also solve all abortion issues that would make both Republicans and Democrats happy. This would also allow a desirable population control. You see, when people get married, traditionally they start thinking about having children, then what happens more than half the time? They become divorced, with a great deal of deadbeat fathers that will not, or can not, pay appropriate child support. This is where welfare has to come in and pay for the raising of these many children. In an “open sex” society, with all women on free birth control, the only women that should get pregnant are the wealthy ones that don’t have to work; because the poor/working women will have less desire to become pregnant when they’re not married, and if they’re properly educated about how a child is a very large burden on a poor/working single mother. The technology is here now so why don’t we use it? – It will lessen our tax burdens; it will stop abortions; it will control population growth (especially for places like China, India, Africa, etc.); and, most of all, it will begin a blissful, total Jesus Christ, peace, love, brotherhood-of-man world. In other words, guys like Dan Quayle could actually become President if they really want to. I’m sure the birth control manufacturers would welcome a huge bulk order, especially if it’s continuous. Of course, a lot of politicians may be reluctant to discourage marriage (like the Bible does) and distribute/advise birth control without approval from the Pope.
It will also be necessary to expose the concealed “cures” for HIV and herpes, that I have just recently attained information about (“ozone therapy” and “raw garlic”); and then, all STD cures and preventives (simple spermicides) should also be made available free, to streamline STDs’ demise. “The spermicide nonoxynol-9 rapidly kills both HIV and sperm” –John G. Bartlett, M.D., Professor of Medicine at John Hopkins University. Nonoxynol-9 also prevents the transmission of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and herpes (when used correctly). According to medical authorities very few women, but some do, have an allergic reaction (irritation) to nonoxynol-9; therefore some substitutes might be necessary. But no matter how you look at it, if everybody (or even just a high percentage) had used nonoxynol-9, then there would be absolutely no STDs at all. Unlike condoms, spermicides don’t hamper sexual enjoyment – and in my opinion it can make it better.
This “open sex” design will also increase worker motivation/enthusiasm/production in both working women and men, because of the absence of the added stress and time involved in raising a family. And, yes, fathers certainly would be allowed to spent a lot of (“quality”) time with their kids, instead of the cumbersome (naturally awkward) day-after-day requirement (everybody knows that women have the “natural instinct” for the daily caring of children). And, with no more dreaded child support fear, fathers would have no reason to avoid their kids. And, yes, people can still share expenses, be friends, go do (other) things together, etc. And, sure, a wealthy man that doesn’t work can raise a child. How much and how fast it will reduce taxes will depend on how fast the public becomes aware of the religious sex lies/mistakes, and how intelligent the birth control education is – a lot of women today get pregnant on (furnished) birth control because they might have their mother on one side saying to take it, but then on the other side they have (what they’ve been told is) God telling them to not take it. And, scientists have found that foreplay sex can be so overwhelming to some people – a literal “stoned” morphine like, chemical effect – that they humanly can’t resist/control it. By the way, this sex chemical “stoned” effect is the only biologically pure (naturally Godly placed), very, very healthy (emotionally and physically) “drug” solution/cure that exists in the world. (Just for [one] example, nuns and priests do see the benefits of blowing their nose but are likely unaware of the cervical and testicle “housekeeping” benefits of regular orgasms.)
From 1804-1806 Lewis and Clark explored the newly acquired Louisiana Purchase. In his journal/report to President Thomas Jefferson, Captain Clark wrote: “The plains of this country are covered with a leek (edible) green grass. Groups of shrubs covered with the most delicious fruit is to be seen in every direction ….” Later, the Federal government (with Protestant missionaries) told the Indians that they could keep their land only if they became “settled farmers,” so to destroy “the Indians’ way” of what was called “sharing resources” (ref. Johnson County Museum [KS]). Later the government even “surveyed parcels” to establish “individual ownerships,” for the Indians. Not all, but the local Black Bob tribe/reservation, for example, opposed this requirement and continued to “leave their land uncultivated and moved from place to place” (incidentally, this post office is on Black Bob Road). The point: Without a proper welfare system, organized “settled farming” is the original cause of prostitution/marriage/monogamy; because it steals God’s natural method of feeding women and children. All I need is just ONE “power person” – that, first of all, is smart enough to know what I’m talking about – and then, and most of all, has at least one honest bone in his/her entire body, then this thing takes off. Oh sure, I’m totally aware that most people in this world will definitely say, and actually believe in their own minds, that they are totally honest; but I am finding that the ones that think they’re the most honest are actually the ones that are the least honest.
If you feel displeased because of the harsh content of this article, please realize that this article can not be just your typical, society acceptable lying, kiss-up “charm” article, because these issues logically are the root causes of all crime, drug abuse, suicide, etc., escalating a great deal of unnecessary suffering (and disputing) in God’s world. In afterlife judgment, religious leaders will wish that I was harsher.
Please inform me of your intentions.
Love (not “lust”),
THS\SOM (removing planks from the eyes of the blind)
P.O. Box 4035
Olathe, Kansas 66063-4035
-- Home (Index) --