Subject: Now admit it:
We’re all idiots, including you and me! So what are we going to do about it? … … … We’re going to smarten up! Well, easier said than done.
7-31-08
Got another popup:
(http://www.quizrocket.com/dumb-test/1?tr=Take%20the%20DUMB%20TEST!&tr=Hey%20Dummy!!!!!&trt=9&gatherer_id=100522&utm_source=ValueClick&utm_medium=Pop&utm_campaign=DumbTestR1)
I guess others just have another way to prove it. Of course, they’re probably selling something.
That’s right, I’m not really 100% perfect:
I had to finally toss aside my Rubik’s Cube, but concerning the war issue, I am having to deal with the same kind of mentality that once halted wars just so all could sit and enjoy the Olympics together, then resume battle afterwards. Taint easy.
Here’s one victim’s feelings:
Danielle Bologna is actually shown on Fox News expressing her very strong heartfelt sorrow for the loss of her murdered husband and two sons. All I can tell her is that any American she kills in revenge via suicide bombing or with a roadside IED within the boundary of Iraq, she will face no Afterlife Punishment, as any America in Iraq today represents the murderers who unmercifully and unjustly killed her family. No, wait a minute. I’ve got my notes mixed up. Danielle’s family was murdered by an illegal alien in San Francisco. For a minute I was really questioning why Fox News would show an Iraqi’s legitimate grievance after an American bombing of Baghdad on national TV. But, now everything fits into reality much better. I mean, who would I be able to put down if Fox News actually really became Fair and Balanced? Apparently Fox News “leans” Fair and Balanced for issues concerning the ousting of illegal aliens, but not on other major WWIII nearing issues. And what’s actually humorous, one can tell that Geraldo Rivera actually “thinks” Fox News is Fair and Balanced. I do think Geraldo is very articulate though, an excellent reporter, who can very concisely and very well describe any story; where I goof my spelling and grammar all the time. So who are you going to “trust”? The headlines also tell: “Widow pleads for death penalty.” You mean people like Danielle whose family was murdered, wishes death for the murderer? Could that possibly be like why so many Americans have been killed since our 2003 “victory” in Operation Iraqi [Something Good For Their People]? Who in the entire United States of American has the ability to “reckon” (versus articulate) that out? “Reckon” is such the correct word here as I’ve seen absolutely no Iraqi civilian news report comparing to Danielle’s. But, who are you going to “just” believe, someone who speaks concise and clearly or some slow, stuttering idiot like me? Danielle said, ‘This is huge. I have lost a husband and two kids.” I don’t think our American soldiers believed that it would be “huge” for any Iraqi family when they dropped all those bombs on Baghdad back in 2003. American soldiers: All smarter or dumber than me?
Would Jesus wish this kind of Fair and Balanced reporting?
Conservatives beware:
“Jesus” says bootlick isn’t going to work: “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who DOES the will of My Father in heaven. MANY will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’” –Matthew 7:21-23.
Hannity tells me to “Practice what you preach, Mr. Hypocrite”:
Yes, you’re right: I do need to get it “perfect” and graphically “lean” the above Fair and Balanced text, describing Fox News, to ____ ___ ________. Now, I hope you all can now better read the reality.
Again, the Law of Averages explains illegal immigrants who commit despicable crimes. But, Fair and Balanced news wants to punish all of them.
O’Reilly really does appreciate me watching his No Spin Zone. He really does appreciate me mailing in my comments. When he reads my mail, whoops, now he’s angry. Actually, every now and then I’ll hear O’Reilly admit error, which means he is superior to most; but, he can’t shake this immigration bias. Sexual suppression from the Middle Ages is also one of his pitfalls. Did he ever cause a sex abuse problem he might be trying to cover up for?
The Story of Christianity: 2,000 Years of Faith, Price and Collins, Tyndale, 1999, p. 48, “The Triumph of Faith | A Religions of Slaves”:
How come it didn’t please the rich conservatives like it does today? (Read the red letter parts in the Bible to find out why.)
P. 50, “The Development of the Church”:
Sounds like Hannity’s kind of people.
Again, O’Reilly’s excuse for his principal “errors”:
Concerning things like the immigration issue and adolescent sex, his only rational support seems to come from “statute.” That is the strongly protected and perfected “law” decreed by Caesar, that any runaway slave be flogged with a metal-tipped whip to cause horrific injury and loss of blood, then expected to carry the cross-beam through the streets to the place of execution, where the prisoner’s arms shall be stretched out and nailed to the cross-beam before it is attached to the upright already standing in place, to which the victim’s feet is nailed. An inscription will be put up with the prisoner’s name and crime written on it. Death will be extremely slow and excruciating, sometimes taking several days, which will finally be caused by asphyxiation as the prisoner is constantly using his feet to push upward to open air passages. Should death be expedited to honor holy days, the prisoner’s lower legs will be cut off to end upward pushing. Or some kind of articulate law like that.
For some illogical reason, people still pursued Freedom. Now Mexican’s and adolescents want It. Don’t let ‘em have It Bill, but encourage more people to die for It. (facetiousness)
If I was dying and had one last lecture, one last sentence to say, it’d clearly be:
Never hurt an innocent person, because those who hurt an innocent are the only ones who deserve being hurt.
I realize “be good” is more pithy, but that requires a not-as-pithy statement from the Catholic or Protestant churches, or secular government to define “good.” In other words, mine above is lots more pithy than the entire Catholic dogma or all secular statutes. See? Any religious or secular law which doesn’t comply with my above statement needs to be changed (unless it pertains to something else). By the way, open-sex begets no victim, as long as there’re no STDs and a Nationally Paid Child Support Program, which is just like the program that funds our schools, but extended. Socialized Child Support for our children, guaranteeing their well being (good shoes, clean sheets, healthy meals, variety of toys, parents who don’t suffer from being degraded, etc.). Now, how can anyone vote against that? When I see a woman beating her kid while leaving the mall, “I” don’t blame the woman, I blame society, especially the conservatives. “Dumb”: It’s what all of you are. Logically. Einstein at best could have only agreed with me.
Another thing about if the surge worked:
I recall right before things started getting better, we blew up a major safe-house, insurgent headquarters, something. I’m considering that could have had most to do with the drop in attacks. Now, if we would have had that informant’s info with or without the surge is a matter for our military to surmise. I would think priority would have been to get top insurgents location information regardless of how many marines we have over there. So this drop in attacks could have happened anyway. Another cause for reduction in attacks is that about the same time, reports were telling that these insurgent militias were starting to kill Iraqi civilians, which drew large opposition from the rest of the Iraqi community. So, again, this drop in attacks with the surge could be just coincidental. But who knows for sure? Plus, this was not really a gradual drop but a sudden drop, thereby supporting my first theory above. Once everyone had carried out their suicide mission after their leader(s) were killed, the sudden drop would have occurred. Of course, surges or drops in attacks are irrelevant to my major points. I guess I’m just trying to help Barak Obama.
It’s funny how al-Qaeda has a presence in Iraq today, but didn’t under Saddam Hussein. How was it that he could keep them out but we can’t?
When Genghis Khan invaded countries, he would have done a lot of killing and maiming, including civilians, to gain control, but after that, it was pretty much a re-building phase. Same in Iraq. So, I believe that if the Iraqi people could somehow accept the U.S. presence, things would end up pretty good there; but, again, because of our killing during our invasion, they are so justified to revenge any American there who represents the killers who murdered their sisters, mothers, brothers, sons, etc., because “educating” others with revenge, when wronged, seems to be a standard with humans, especially against a country like the United States who appears to be the most ignorant. (Thinking between the extremes requires using the word “but” a lot.) If / when we “just” pull out, again, Iran, or Russia, or Israel, or China, or someone will go in and take control (assuming the insurgents destroy that American placed Iraqi government we’d leave there), which could lead to even more problems: Say Russia and China are both trying to take control of Iraq, then they get into a war – it’d be a biggie. So, that’s why I (a nobody) suggests that, before we just leave, we give power and control over to someone like Iran, or whoever the Iraqi people would like the most. It’d probably have to be someone who doesn’t have perfect relations with the United States, to lessen / end Iraqi violence. – So there’s the catch-22 why it’s not going to happen. I’m still guessing Iran may be the best choice. Then we’d also become pals with Iran, solving that problem at the same time. But like act reluctant when giving power over to Iran, so the Iraqis will think Iran is far from the scum who killed their sisters, mothers, brothers, and sons. Of course there was the Iraq-Iran war. I don’t know how that still sits with Iraq. Maybe Syria; then “just” get along with Syria. Well, then there’s that Israel problem with Syria. I think we may be all doomed thanks to those important Holy Land cop-outs. I’ve told you all, excuses for not doing the Goldenrule is the biggest problem in need of repair. How about just restitution for the Palestinians? Nope, totally out of the question: Jesus isn’t in charge, George W. Bush is in charge.
All in all, I say we should leave Iraq even though we’re making rebuilding progress there, because they really don’t like us there (even if our intentions are now good), and mainly because every time one of our soldiers kill an insurgent (even in self defense) they’re killing an innocent person – same as if it was 1988 and the Russians had killed Toby and Willie’s loved ones, necessary to take over America in 1983 (well, we did have threatening WMDs, so the Iraqis are even more justified). After we leave, we can still help Iraq’s rebuilding process by just mailing a check. Aren’t you glad of that Mr. President?
McCain tells it like it is:
Is John McCain “highly educated” or something? McCain explains that Obama is more interested in winning the election than winning the war in Iraq. Isn’t that just saying that the majority of Americans don’t want to win the war in Iraq? I’m telling you, Republicans are going to eventually push for a dictator instead of democracy. Actually the Republicans don’t really care if we win the war in Iraq (there’s no selfish financial gain to be had), they all just want to save face. Selfish pride rules the most selfish. And the reality is, none probably realize it; and, that’s the world’s (and the U.S. people’s) biggest danger. If the Republicans care so much about helping the Iraqis, they can just pull out and send a check, eh?
Shouldn’t McCain pick President Romney for Vice?
Main characteristics:
Conservatism is evil / selfishness exposed. Liberals post more liberal / generous views, but are generally dumber people. You may ask why I don’t watch and target liberals more than conservatives. To me, smarter people are easier for me to reason with. And, conservatives are the ones more in need of improvement (but then, less open for it). If I win reason with a liberal, not much changes; but, if I win reason with a conservative a lot can change. But overall, since there are lots of atheists who are generous liberals, while evil conservatives praise the extremely liberal teachings of Jesus, dumb is still the main obstacle regardless. Churches having to rely on “money” may be the real culprit, where people like me don’t have any constraints. There probably are more people like me in this world, but don’t have the time to do what I do (a lot of time in research and thinking is involved), because they have a job, family, etc. that keeps them too busy. And those in the church, media or government have to stay within those stereotypes or they are out of not just a job, but a career. Me, I’m “it”: nobody else. Plus people’s minds / thoughts / beliefs are controlled by the stereotype they have to adhere to. So, O’Reilly, you’re not any different.
(I understand that your hands are currently tied, but you all should try to find a way to get my stuff disseminated, if you want a better future for our kids.)
Muslim honor killings are because of strict marriage standards:
That “fits.” Tell’em the only reason they do it is because they’ve been “taught it.”
Ahmedabad attacked by terrorists:
Can you believe there’s an Islamic town in India called Ahmedabad? I mean Ahmedabad sounds like the name of a town in California or Massachusetts. “Santa Domingo,” “Likenshire,” or “New Brunswick” sounds like what towns should be called in Islam. Yeah, I know I’m not funny. Well, at least they’re admitting they’re bad. Even worse! (Targeted to the way they treat their women… and children.) Somebody slap this Mr. Critical anyway. If only George W. Bush could say: “Admit I’m bad.” STOP!
Well, I just don’t think towns deserved being bombed that at least admit they’re bad. Bang! (Good thing that was just the Ghost talking.)
Admitting you are “bad” is the first step to making things better. (I’m now talking from the Afterlife.)
Don’t ban Iran, man:
“Statistics” show that the best antiwar solution has been letting contending countries have nuclear weapons. As well as Russia and the United States and China and the United States had got along during the many decades after WWII, it is clear that if all of us didn’t have nuclear weapons, we’d have had World War Three, Four and Five by now. Probably wouldn’t be anybody left living at all by now (using conventional warfare). And the United States is the only country who targeted the largest slaughter against innocent civilians only when we were the only ones who possessed nuclear weapons. So maybe if we let the next contender, Iran, have nuclear weapons, there will be excuses for getting along rather than excuses for fighting, especially if it relates to the United States.
Shooting rampage in Tennessee Church because they side liberal and are gay-friendly:
That “fits.” Tell shooter that today’s major religious leaders refuse to tell the truth about what the original Greek and Hebrew says about homosexuality.
Lesbian song is number one:
I Kissed A Girl by Katy Perry being number ONE on the current music charts will surely influence young girls to become lesbians. I told you a simple fad could change it all pretty much overnight. Now, someone just has to write a song about open-sex where diversity in looks is best. But, I say wait until all STDs have cures first, and a Nationally Paid Child Support Program in place.
I.e.: “I kissed a girl and I liked it. The taste of her cherry chapstick. I kissed a girl just to try it. I hope my boyfriend don’t mind it. It felt so wrong – it felt so right.” I wonder if it felt better when early Christians did it thinking it was only “so right”? The “kiss of peace” or “holy kiss” was instructed by Paul for all to do whenever they met with one another. See Rom. 16:16; 1 Cor. 16:20; 2 Cor. 13:12; 1 Thes. 5:26; and 1 Peter 5:14. It is on record that it gradually changed to just men kissing men and women just kissing women at mass, then (about the time homosexuality became outlawed) to just all kissing a crucifix (pax). Today, the priest just kisses the pax, because it was ordered by Paul. I betcha all didn’t know about that. Now, y’all make sure you don’t disseminate anything that would hurt the image of today’s church. (I’d love it if someone would try to explain to me how Paul was not trying to get everyone to sexually enjoy one another. Sexual kissing back then was the same as sexual kissing is today, according to ancient art, Song of Solomon, etc.)
The problem with the Katy Perry’s song making “wrong” feel so “right” via a very powerful tool (sex), will also cause less respect for the Goldenrule, which will cause more “real” / harmful sin. Y’all need to make me boss sooner than later. No one else is even close to getting it right.
“It’s not what good girls do: not how they should behave. My head gets so confused: hard to obey.” It’s this thought, that bi sex is wrong, is what’s going to move more and more future people away from the Church / religion.
“It’s not what I’m used to. Just want to try you on. I’m curious for you. Caught my attention.” Humans are curious to try new things. That’s what keeps us from becoming Zurps from Blurp (conservative). We being in the image of God, and since God is also the progress of the universe, our duty is to try new things, just like how God wants diversity and progress. You see, humans bring great progress and material joy to God over the other do-the-same-routine-every-day animals, who achieve over immovable plants, who achieve something new and different over the even less movable rocks. Rocks, valleys, rivers, mountains also progress over just burning stars. And burning stars / galaxies are much more interesting than a universe full of nothing but the same sized gravitons. So God likes it when we try / discover something new. The only exception is if it hurts an innocent person. (I hope I’m commenting to these lyrics in my usual far more superior manner.)
“Us girls we are so magical – soft skin, red lips, so kissable, hard to resist, so touchable: too good to deny it.” Sounds like guys are getting the bum rap when our minds are set for the most attractive; but, I have to include them in the overall sexual equation. So, a desire for “diversity” in partner’s appearances is key to future sexual success.
For those who I’ve passed up several paragraphs ago, today’s marriage standard is not what Christ spoke for in the Bible, and the only reason you think I’m wrong is because you are too dumb to reckon over what you’ve been traditionally taught. To accurately put it more pithily: You are a very dumb gullible animal. Where other animals, those without high communication skills, are not near as gullible. (E.g.: Animals won’t run at a machine gun just because “somebody” tells them to.) Again, that’s the most “accurate” and pithy way to describe it. So, there’s no way anybody with friends could pinpoint the problem and address the solution better than me. Believing we know it all because we are highly educated blocks the all important first step of understanding “error.” Step two is beyond reach when we can’t reach the step one first. A prerequisite to the first step is somehow realizing that “highly educated” doesn’t mean “open minded,” which are proven opposites.
Degrade:
You don’t think that making welfare recipients feel degraded affects anything, and that that has anything to do with the high inner city crime rate and street gangs, but we could have probably avoided this entire Iraq war mess if we would have instead “enthused” Saddam Hussein into “seeing the world” and visiting all the very beautiful, historic and interesting places, that costs the normal person a lot of money to do, instead of demanding he go into degrading “exile” (where he could have still seen the world, but would have felt it as a degrade).
I do know someone once who got off welfare because she said she didn’t like the way she was being treated at the SRS office. So the above just applies to those not so talented. Still, her and her kid’s lives were constant chaos. I guess working just to make ends meet (just getting the basics) doesn’t really change things that much. I propose giving ends-meet to everyone. Then everyone can be like those going to college being supported by their parents. Or that guy who makes ends-meet in six months that still works through the rest of the year (who can afford “more.”) That’s what “I” (only) propose.
The society-pressured feeling of degradation also is what makes most all women only want to be with one man, not many; where guys are more Free to pursue what is natural.
The future:
Say there are cures for all STDs. Then in 20 years, wife swapping and promiscuous sex comes to a high. Ugly people end up with even less then they have now, and attractive people get it all. Then say we’re convinced that this new Nationally Paid Child Support Program, implemented five years ago, is working very well for everyone, especially for kids. Then have someone with lots of talent sing a song like: “I kissed someone who looked totally different than those I usually kiss, and I liked it! It’s not what I’m used to. It felt so good: It felt like my first kiss: I felt a kind of spark I haven’t felt in years” or something (obviously my forte is not song writing). Maybe add how great a piece of bread tastes after eating nothing but candy all year. Or how much more beautiful it is to visit a different park after only knowing one park. Smell a “different” kind of flower. Etc. Again, if everyone could care for everyone the same as men care for women today, then it’d be a totally different / much better / utopia world. Up the love between “one another” and crime, unfairness goes way down. End the “lust” (strong / intense desires to possess just one) and domestic violence goes away. With my suggestion, logically, we can get to the point where police are really not needed anymore. No one has every figured this out before. Then when the Devil comes and suggests we should open our minds up and try to sexually desire only one kind of look, or that one perfect match for each person, it becomes rather boring rather fast. Lots of “spark” is lost. No one will want to go back to the marriage standard. Of course, God does like and functions better with diversity, so there will be varying lengths that couples stay only with each other, for various reasons. Probably more with older people, and like those who want to live in Antarctica, etc. But as long as the majority gets their variety until whatever age, and wherever they go, the overall consensus will be a caring for all as much as men care today for women.
I bet George W. Bush thinks those two should get a room.
My February 1998 fax to the White House:
Foreigners are now saying that Barak Obama is going to make the world a better place. Great! (Good thing for McCain that he sent him over there.) But be careful, George W. Bush also thought he was going to make Iraq a better place. Could now be a good time to “consider” my antiwar thesis?
Counterculture:
“I’d love to change the world; but, I don’t know what to do. So I’ll leave it up to you.” –Ten Years After, 1971. Well I appreciate that. If everyone could be that smart, we’d have the solution.
Another thing:
You are a bad person if you eat animals!
Mr. Critical – I’m just more wisdomer.
TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/