Subject:  “Dumb”: there’s no better word for it.

July 23, 2007

Many of you are thinking: no, I’m not dumb buddy, I’m evil.  But I’m still seeing your choices as more dumb than so proudly evil.  Ironically, it is better thinking you’re more evil than stupid, because there is a slight chance you can change when you admit to yourself you’re evil and totally self centered, especially when you are entertained by your evil.  The hardest people to change are those who think they are not evil.  And, those are the ones who cause the most problems in the world. 

How to become a better Missionary Man:

If I ever get the time, I plan to market my new Hump Rump Pump.  It’s for all you chumps who have wives that aren’t plump (who have normal sized behinds).  You’ll just neatly fit one, flat under the fitted sheet on her side of the bed.  Then, when the time’s right, hit the button on the pump and up lumps the bump under her rump.  Or, just get a full figured gal.  Either way, the ride will be much more comfortable.  Believe me, your legs and back will thank you the next day.  You’re just not going to get this kind of insight on CNN.

(She’s not “fat,” she’s “fluffy.”)

The dumb human animal:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=skinhead, “skinhead”:

A skinhead friend of mine once told me that he only fights for 3 things: his family, his friends and his honor.

And, RIGHT OR WRONG in all cases.  It certainly fits with the word “dumb” which seems to be the sentiment of all, especially American leaders, media and people.  James Dobson would be proud (with the “family” part included).  The dumb human animal: he just knows how to communicate it, that’s the only difference.

How come we got so many people wanting to suicide kill us all?

It’s because our government leaders are working.  “Be thankful we’re not getting all the government we’re paying for.” –Will Rogers.  Too bad this statement can’t always be true, or we wouldn’t have so many people wanting to 9/11 us.  Our government constantly is reminding us of the many people who want to kill us.  That’s to get us to say okay to more aggression against them – which will just make their friends and relatives want to kill us.  And on and on, until they are able to grow large enough to sufficiently accomplish it – like the fall of Rome.  The only solution (other than restitution) is mass genocide.  Contrary to popular American government leader beliefs, they’re not going to “just” wake up some morning and realize that the Americans who just killed their friend or relative, was justified.  Especially in an area where we are not wanted.  “Dumb”: there’s no better word for it.  O’Reilly stresses ridding our country of unwanted immigrants, but inconsistently thinks it’s totally okay for us to be where we’re not wanted (e.g., Iraq).  That’s cause guys like O’Reilly are just for themselves (and are “dumb”).  And those who agree with O’Reilly are the worst of the same.  Many people don’t know that much of America’s war history was based on American unfairness, greed, and cowardness.  We would just take what we wanted, period.  And then always “think” we were fair.  Ask the Mexicans.  Ask the Indians.  Etc.

Protestants are the worst, and the main reason so many want to kill us:

“I am weak and he is strong, Me and God. He forgives me when I'm wrong, Me and God. He's the one I lean on when life gets hard, Me and God.” –Gosh Turner, 2006.  I’m finding more and more often that Protestants not only sin / lie whenever they want, but they actually believe in their own mind that they are good people, when they’re not.  I think when they are first presented with the erroneous teaching that God provides no penalties for their special, unique, secret, undocumented, etc. relationship with God / Jesus, their subconscious reckons justification for all profitable wrongs against innocents.  Then it’s just an embedded (non reckoning) standard practice from then on, and that makes it real easy to lie to one’s self that he / she is good.  “Dumb”: there’s no better word for it.  They are even more justified to wrong others for profit when they are taught about the highly valued family standard, where added justification in wronging others is blessed for the importance of providing for one’s family and the inheritance.  Of course, the person they really ignore the most, firmly said: “For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.” –Matthew 10:35-37.  “He” is the Goldenrule, because that’s what He preached.  “And great multitudes went with Him. And He turned and said to them, ‘If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple.’” –Luke 14:25-26.  ^“Then His brothers and His mother came, and standing outside they sent to Him, calling Him. And a multitude was sitting around Him; and they said to Him, ‘Look, Your mother and Your brothers are outside seeking You.’ But He answered them, saying, ‘Who is My mother, or My brothers?’ And He looked around in a circle at those who sat about Him, and said, ‘Here are My mother and My brothers! For whoever does the will of God (being good to others) is My brother and My sister and mother.’” –Mark 3:31-35.  It stresses something important, if ever exists again someone smart enough to figure it out.  Course, James Dobson would argue that since there’s no more free food, free (good) land, free resources, etc. God cannot provide any longer, so their must be a way to feed our kids.  But, crazy me thinks “the system” (that’s the cause of the monopolies) should pay the bill (a Nationally Paid Child Support Program).  And a minimum welfare allowance for everyone else.  Folks will still work like the dickens for more; but, maybe not so much with excessive greed, games and dishonesty.  Fewer will feel the desire / justification to rob and steal, and use drugs (illegal and legal).  Add free sex to the bill and then wonder how we ever made it before, constantly suppressing God greatest basic rewarding desire.  Possibly the constant brainwashed suppression of sexual satisfaction (consciously: men; and, subconsciously: women), the continuous unfulfillment, is one of the causes of us all dying so young.  Humans’ high communication skills allow us to be much more easily brainwashed than animals.  So we progress, but mainly for the rich and lucky.  “Won't you tell me if you can – ‘cause life's so hard to understand – why's the rich man busy dancing, while the poor man pays the band.  Oh they're billing me for killing me.  Lord have mercy on the working man.” –Travis Tritt, 1992.  Many think since the U.S. is so much richer than other countries, makes everything we do all right and optimized; but, Las Vegas is shinning in glory, but uses a sinful basis (gambling) to accomplish it.  There is a way to make everywhere look like Las Vegas without the destruction of others, by constructive fair pay; because, a happy / more enthused worker is a better, more efficient, and more productive worker.  Slaves that work all day just to make ends meet, don’t “care” to work as productively as those who work for “more,” unless you just want to bring slavery back.  I’ve worked both ways: (1) Constantly looking at the time clock (with burden), and (2) Working 16 hour days because I was so into my work that I didn’t realize how late it was getting (enthused).  However, most employers “see” most people showing up each day for that making-ends-meet pay.  Therefore, the government needs to implement a minimum welfare for everyone (to like equal all of God’s free food and resources available in Missouri 200 years ago), so instead of everyone starting at the bottom to find themselves basically staying there the rest of their lives, everyone can start in the middle and work their way “up.”  “Up” for everyone is Jesus’ wish.

Protestants actually believing they are good people, can backfire on them:  They’ll instruct scholars, researchers, parishioners, etc. to search based on “truth.”  Then, when you scar their prime directive, they’ll either ignore it, change it, and/or blackball you, and continue to believe what they want – the human mind is that powerful.  But, this Protestant ability to fool themselves will eventually be their downfall, as it does direct congregations to mandate the truth to be sought.  No individual can successfully offset a congregation that’s prime directive is truth, or his / her individual evil will become apparent.  In other words, they will eventually fool themselves into truth.  So, we’ll just have to wait for the numbers to grow until the secular mainstream media is ready, who is of the same mindset, but who is very ignorance about religious (truth) issues (like how Jesus said to not marry, and never said we can’t have sex outside of marriage).  But, of course, that’s going to get your live-in prostitute to divorce you.  So, it’s back to me putting the pressure on the Catholic Church to expose the truth (because most don’t have to bootlick to a prostitute, because they have a low libido).  I think we’ll have to wait for a Pope who is not so old and therefore adamantly set in his ways:  The power of a lifetime of embedded brainwash is much harder to break than some young soldier who thinks it’s good to run toward a machine gun for his country, or blow himself up as a terrorist.

Yes, I realize a Protestant will do hundreds of small and insignificant truths and/or minor good deeds to fool themselves and others, to make up for that one needed big lie or bad deed.  Like Fox News will be fair and balanced on many trivial issues while still not correctly explaining about that slant drilling (and probably lots of other stuff: “big” stuff).  But, the rest of us would “like” to find a / the solution to the increasing number of people who want to suicide kill us.  Pride for the few is not going to let that happen, is it?  Who’s going to pay the bill?  The ones who supported the war should be the ones who pay it, but since there’s no way the IRS can easily distinguish, I just want to remind everyone how much better we’d be getting along with the Iraqi people and others in the Middle East if we’d have spent one-tenth of what’s we’ve spent on the Iraq war, on the Jesus solution I suggested in February of 1998.  But then I have to personally admit, it was rather entertaining after we killed thousands of Iraqi civilians (for their freedom) and thousands of “innocent” Iraqi military (since they weren’t defending WMDs) how we “took” Baghdad just to place ourselves as sitting ducks for some sweet revenge for our twelve years of continuous “terrorism” against the civilians of Iraq.  There’s no way the average American could have figured out this reality until and unless we took Baghdad.  (I did mention it.)  So, since that’s the only way we will learn, I may as well just keep my opinions to myself.  Fox News is trying hard to say that every Iraqi civilian, whether killed by an American bomb, to trying to get around the house after the lights went out (after we bombed their power plants), were all thinking how important and fair the American cause must be (which Americans today are still trying to figure out).  Just like how we’d all be thinking how evil American leaders must be if the Soviets would have bombed us during the Cold War.  (Of course, we all [really] could care less about ethics: all we want to know at this point is what is going to make the terrorists not want to kill us, for our extreme selfish, cowardice reasons.  Still, “dumb” is the best word to use.)

Jesus really says to love one another especially your enemy, and to “hate” your own family.  Well, it makes sense why today’s church likes to reference the Old Testament more.  But I have to admit, if I wasn’t as smart as me, Jesus wouldn’t make sense to me either.  Again, it’s that partiality demon that’s causing all the problems.

The power of our trusted leaders and forefathers:

Boy I tell ya, telling people I meet, that Jesus didn’t condemn sex out of marriage, and was actually against marriage and even the family bond, is like strongly telling people (today) that the earth is flat: they’re not going to “just” believe you: they’re all “too smart.”  And worse, because they would just think you’re an idiot if you told them the world is flat, but they’ll judge you as evil concerning Jesus.  So, technically, it’s impossible for an individual to unveil the corrupt church until the church itself does it.  Then I’m sure most still won’t believe them.  Like an enormous asteroid hit, I can understand how nothing could be harder to break than the church sex lie; and I can see daily that no other one thing could benefit the world more.  “If” it happened (the church exposed the truth), and it was believed and understood, then everybody would think they must comply immediately, today, and leave their spouses, etc.  But, since the human mind is so dumb and we work best on routine, I would strongly recommend no one change their current lifestyles.  We would just be teaching a new / the younger generation.

Duh-debacle:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_bombings_in_Iraq_since_2003

Notice how the longest list is in the year 2007, and we’re barely half way through it.  I said it’d be this way.  Now someone smart explain to me if all this would have happened if individual pride would have allowed them to take my “important” first fax advice to the White House in February 1998?  And who is everyone’s favorite person to ignore today?  I was smarter than you all then, and I’m being repeatedly reminded that I’m smarter than you all now, moreover.  Quit giving this dumb troop surge a chance to work, and just do what I say, and quit thinking.  Using your unfair high advantage to put the screws to poor (and middle class) Americans works great in this country, but them Muslims aren’t going to take it.  Their book tells them to fight back.  Don’t do what the Democrats say either: they’re idiots too:  It takes a two-step thinking process: Pull fully out, then pay restitution to the living.  Well, we were in the wrong!  Well, we are idiots!  Well, because of all that, we should “lose.”  And hurry it up: every day more and more young minds over there are being taught and instilled to become suicide terrorists.  I foresee future problems with that.  And, tell Israel that praying at a museum is just another cop-out, and their safe haven is waiting for them in West Texas.  Tell them to put the Old Testament in a museum (in West Texas), then teach “the entire Torah while standing on one foot” and say: “What is hateful to you, do not do unto others. All the rest is commentary.”  Tell’em to phrase it in One Word, then while standing on the one foot the body will not waver.

The most wonderful place in the world:

In 1541, Coronado was lured to Kansas “where lords swung their hammocks in trees bedecked with golden bells that tinkled gently in the breeze.”  (According to the book I have.)  Which he couldn’t ever find, so just tell the Jews paradise / Quivira has now been found in West Texas.  And that gentle tinkling produced the finest of music to lull the king to sleep.  By day, the lovely charms would captivate the most wild of beasts, the rock and stones would sway along; branches would bend over to listen, rivers would stop flowing to hear, leaves would fly nearby, and even the torments of the damned in Hades were suspended while it played.  (Well, I just made up that last sentence.)

When I have completed my verses, One Word will thunder through the heavens: all legions will halt their hostilities to hear my words, the clouds will stop crying and open up so all can see the smiling sun.  My children will fly upwards following the light of faith in truth toward to grace of heaven; being cautious to not fly too close to the sun, or their wings made of wax will melt and they will crash back to the earth and into the great abyss.  Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know: you’ve heard it all before.

http://www.reisenett.no/map_collection/National_parks/Coronado_Expedition.jpg, The Coronado Expedition, 1540-42:

“Supposed location of Quivira” is about Abilene, Kansas:

Missions on duh El Camino Real:

You don’t break the Goldenrule to teach the Goldenrule.  Or you’re… just an idiot.

“Spin”: “To provide an interpretation of (a statement or event, for example), especially in a way meant to sway public opinion”:

On 7-12-07, the No Spin Zone insinuated vegan PETA guest can only eat celery.  Read Vegetarian Times, Bill.  There’s a lot more food varieties in the plant world than there is in the animal world, especially when it comes to taste.  Try not to be “dumb.”  Think!  Meat is just filler around all the plant life we smother around it.  Meat used to be, and still is, more expensive to procure, so what’s going to impress your girl friend more?  The lack of quality vegan and vegetarian dishes in restaurants makes its popularity obscure, Bill.  When society outlaws animal slaughter, we’ll have some truly great dishes in restaurants, and the kind that are much healthier.  I recently heard one can “cure” diabetes by following a strict vegan diet.  Quick photo:

 –We can do it!

http://www.ivu.org/history/native_americans.html, History of Vegetarianism: Native Americans and Vegetarianism:

“More tribes were like the Choctaws than were different. Aztec, Mayan, and Zapotec children in olden times ate 100% vegetarian diets until at least the age of ten years old. The primary food was cereal, especially varieties of corn. Such a diet was believed to make the child strong and disease resistant. (The Spaniards were amazed to discover that these Indians had twice the life-span they did.) A totally vegetarian diet also insured that the children would retain a life-long love of grains, and thus, live a healthier life.”  You know the early Old Testament is filled with documentation of humans who lived for hundreds of years.

If fish couldn’t feel pain, they couldn’t move and react.  And they would have absolutely no protection in keeping themselves alive all these years so they could still exist.  Poke a fish with a needle, and watch it move away… rather quickly.  Once I was watching a documentary where a diver with a camera was following a shark underwater at a relatively short distance, where the shark knew he was there, but just continued to leisurely swim ahead.  As part of the plan, from a boat, someone did something to poke the shark.  Later, no one seemed to be able to understand why the shark instantly attacked the diver who was closely following it.  And, these were articulate people.  I think sharks can not only feel pain, but have a desire for self defense or revenge, and are apparently much smarter than some humans.  (Obviously thinking the diver close-by somehow did the poke.)  Well, one has to be a little bit stupid to want to swim near sharks in the first place.  One can get their Omega-3s from flax seed oil.

Jesus implied that it was okay to eat fish.  All I can say is that, logically, one needs to understand the basis of Jesus’ Goldenrule ethics, and go that one extra step by also not eating fish (or, pass that one extra test).  Otherwise, if documented law is the only limit you have, then you fail to meet the criteria to walk freely in the future Kingdom of Heaven, where there will be no list of laws, only good people.  Therefore, if you now can only live by the law, you will always require law to exist.  In other words, you won’t be worthy to leave in peace, and therefore eternal happiness.  If we let someone in that requires law, then we’ll have to implement laws.  Then it will just become another corrupt society like we have today.  I betcha you’re never going to hear that sermon in church.

The sacrament of marriage:

“She said: ‘Give it away. Just give it away. … There ain't nothin' in this house worth fightin' over. Oh, an' we're both tired of fightin' anyway, so just give it away.’ … I've got a furnished house, a diamond ring, an' a lonely broken heart, full of love, an' I can't even give it away.” –George Strait, 2006.

http://www.abundance-and-happiness.com/funny-marriage-quotes.html, Funny Marriage Quotes:

"I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury." -Groucho Marx

“Getting married is a lot like getting into a tub of hot water. After you get used to it, it ain't so hot.” -Minnie Pearl

"A man is incomplete until he is married. After that, he is finished." -Zsa Zsa Gabor

"Can you imagine a world without men? No crime and lots of happy, fat women." -Marion Smith

“My mother once told me that if a married couple puts a penny in a pot for every time they make love in the first year, and takes a penny out every time after that, they'll never get all the pennies out of the pot.” -Armistead Maupin

"There's a way of transferring funds that is even faster than electronic banking. It's called marriage." -James Holt McGavran

“All marriages are happy. It's the living together afterward that causes all the trouble.” -Raymond Hull

“The total amount of undesired sex endured by women is probably greater in marriage than in prostitution.” -Bertrand Russell

“Marriage: A legal or religious ceremony by which two persons of the opposite sex solemnly agree to harass and spy on each other for ninety-nine years, or until death do them join.” -Elbert Hubbard

"The husband who wants a happy marriage should learn to keep his mouth shut and his checkbook open." -Groucho Marx

“Do you know what it means to come home at night to a woman who'll give you a little love, a little affection, a little tenderness? It means you're in the wrong house, that's what it means.” -Henny Youngman

"I require only three things of a man. He must be handsome, ruthless and stupid." -Dorothy Parker

“When a girl marries she exchanges the attentions of many men for the inattention of one.” -Helen Rowland

"Marriage is an adventure, like going to war." -G. K. Chesterton

“Alimony - The ransom that the happy pay to the devil.” -H.L. Mencken

“I love being married. It's so great to find that one special person you want to annoy for the rest of your life.” -Rita Rudner

“Marriage is like a phone call in the night: first the ring, and then you wake up.” -Evelyn Hendrickson

"After marriage, husband and wife become two sides of a coin; they just can't face each other, but still they stay together." -Hemant Joshi

“My mother said it was simple to keep a man, you must be a maid in the living room, a cook in the kitchen and a whore in the bedroom. I said I'd hire the other two and take care of the bedroom bit.” -Jerry Hall

"I never married because I have three pets at home that answer the same purpose as a husband. I have a dog that growls every morning, a parrot that swears all afternoon and a cat that comes home late at night." -Marie Corelli

“Marriage is a wonderful invention: then again, so is a bicycle repair kit.” -Billy Connolly

“Alimony is like buying oats for a dead horse.” -Arthur Baer

“I think men who have a pierced ear are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought jewelry.” - Rita Rudner

"Marriage is give and take. You'd better give it to her or she'll take it anyway." -Joey Adams

“Three rings of marriage are the engagement ring, the wedding ring, and the suffering.” -Unknown

“Women hope men will change after marriage but they don't; men hope women won't change but they do.” -Bettina Arndt

“Before marriage, a man declares that he would lay down his life to serve you; after marriage, he won't even lay down his newspaper to talk to you.” -Helen Rowland

“The secret of a happy marriage remains a secret.” -Henny Youngman

“If you want to sacrifice the admiration of many men for the criticism of one, go ahead, get married.” -Kathari Hepburn

“It's a funny thing that when a man hasn't anything on earth to worry about, he goes off and gets married.” -Robert Frost

"I never knew what real happiness was until I got married. And by then it was too late." -Max Kauffmann

“Everywhere you look you can write a book, on the trouble with a woman and a man. But you can not impose, you can't stick your nose into somethin' that ya don't understand” –Alan Jackson, 1997.  I hear ya.

Testing drugs on animals:

Why not test on humans?  There are a lot of terminally ill humans who would gladly allow their body to be used for drug testing:  They know they are “meeting God” soon, so this kind of good deed to mankind would help.  If the drug causes some kind of painful reaction, then they can get morphine or okay euthanasia.  We’d have to make that legal first.  “Dumb” (there’s no better word for it) is the reason we disallow it.  One thing that should scare me more than anything else in this world is becoming desolate and in pain, with no one allowing me to die.  Logically, I should kill myself as soon as possible to avoid that possibility.  But, I’m going to play my entire life on red and take my chances.

Yeah:

You know, a good definition of brainwashed is a woman who trades the generous affection of several men for the lifetime criticism and demands of one man.  Only something as powerful as the church can do it.  Just because they didn’t have electricity, don’t think our corrupt religious forefathers were necessarily dumber than you.

Car bomb terror scare in London:

I recommend starting a war with somebody.  Maybe somewhere that has a high Islamic presence.  We are smart and they are dumb, so we should target as many civilians as possible like we did in Vietnam.  That will show them that we are ruthless, so they will quit wanted revenge.  We should use Christ’s name during our bombings of innocent civilians like Richard Nixon’s “Christmas bombing” so to better show what the Protestant religious is really all about.  The majority of suits in this country will agree.  They are smart and I am dumb.  They know that by electing smart people to rule is the solution in making America (and London) safe.  It is also good to have a major cable news network convey that the only reason Muslims want to kill us, is simply because we are not Muslim.  That will make our honest people feel better, and make the rest of the people think we need to start and/or intensify more wars and aggression. 

We can all thank Bill Clinton for showing me in 1998 how he’s not going to let some nobody influence his major decisions.  He’s smart.  Don’t you all agree?  George Bush is equally smart.  You’ll all agree even more when those bombs starts going off, and your loved one is there.  I guess the most all important thing is to not let any rich people admit to “mistakes.”

Restitution for our enemies (those we’ve wronged: even the terrorists):

That’d mean we’d be rewarding evil!  No.  That’d mean we’d have to give money to everyone else in the world too, or they’d know to just treat us evil to get it!  No, we should only give restitution… to those… we have wronged!  Not just to any / every body.  Not just to people who hurt us.  Then, I don’t know, give future restitution only to people we hurt and/or kill in the future.  Hey, it might just be easier to never hurt another innocent person again – that’s talking crazy.  Now, the first step is admitting that we’ve wronged them (just in the areas where we have hurt any of their innocent people).  The next step would be convincing us to pay them… money.  I just enjoy saying the only possible solution: I don’t expect it to be done.  It’s the only “fair” solution too.  This just makes me the only American who has a legitimate gripe if a terrorist hurts me.  You say: Restitution would just be money used for them to build bombs, etc. to get us back.  I disagree.  They’re not going to want to mess up something that pays them money.  And when we give them money at a distance (if we came home), then it would be much more appreciated, and recognized as in good faith; where now, we can’t get that kind of sense while we’re controlling Baghdad, because it’s too apparent anything we do is just for ourselves in our selfish interest of “winning” and in conquering the country, and setting ourselves up geographically to attack other Muslim countries.  And there’s oil – I probably could go on and on.  I’m smart enough to know this, and most of the Iraqis are smart enough to know this, but conservatives and Fox News apparently aren’t aware that we are smart enough to know this.  (Mainly regarding sectarian violence:) The logical and fairness knowledge that they should only target the direct evil individual(s) instead of innocent people would also be very helpful: I assume they don’t know this simply because we don’t know it.  That’s because the direct evil individual(s) (our and their leaders) are the ones who control what gets said.  Once they start beating us, I don’t think I will be able to talk them into stopping.  Well, Rome should have treated those slaves and criminals better too.  Sorry, Mr. Critical: We don’t believe in the same restitution God of fairness that you do, and we’ll be happy to take our risks.

And the kind of restitution I’m talking about includes payments to compensate for all the added pain and suffering we’ve caused.  That should include substantial restitution payments to families of U.S. soldiers who have died or been wounded over there (since the family standard is so strong today).

Every cop-out one can think:

George even insinuated we lost the Iraqi war because we sent F-Troop over there.  God is teaching us a hard lesson in ethics / fairness.

Toby Keith has a new song:

…that says “Sometimes I think that war is necessary.”  I agree.  Like if you have a city, country, or a castle, you are not killing any “innocent” people when an army is attacking you, like for your gold, to change your system of government (to follow a new god), or they just need more slaves to work in their mines.  Especially if they are using catapults to shoot over your walls, with no regard for striking your innocent people inside.  You are not hurting any innocent people when firing hundreds of arrows toward their attack or camp established for their offensive purpose.  Now, if you go to their city or castle and start catapulting projectiles over their walls, then you are disregarding the lives of their innocent people, and make yourself part of the same kind of evil.  Therefore, morally, the people in Iraq today certainly have the right to kill any American within its boundary (walls), but they do not have the moral right to come over here and start shooting off catapults.  Thanks Toby for your attentive addition to that unexplained detail.  Or, defaulting to the current issue, with caution maybe Toby’s still referring to the Iraq war, even after no found WMDs.  He should then write a song about how important it is to kill innocent people to stop Saddam Hussein from killing innocent people… back in the 1980s.  He could add a second song titled “Fairness” explaining why it’s fair we can have WMDs but no one else can (especially when we have proved we will not defend their country).  Then he could write a third (Gospel) song about how Jesus says to not even hurt the enemy attacking your city/castle, which would make retaliatory decisions easier for the advanced human mind.  Hey, “I” could pretty much write his entire next CD.  We’ll know he’s ignoring the subject if there’s just more fun bar brawlin’, beer flyin’, two timin’ music in his next CD.  Then I can better enjoy his music, and leave me the only one with all the answers.

“You've gotta get high on the mountain, and see what's going on.”

“Fair” is going to “win” (eventually):

If it was your loved-one who was the innocent person who had to die for your gain (or protection), would your decision be different?  Regarding war, I think it would be different, but only about 100% of the time.

We’re gonna get them before they get us, Mr. Critical:

If you’re-uh thinkin’ that there are times when we need to get them over there before they get us over here, then that just justifies the attack on Pearl Harbor.  Which just opens the door to starting a war (the violent part) just about anytime or anywhere: it makes war a never-ending thing.  Would things have been better off for both us and the Japanese, if the Japanese didn’t think the same way we do today (et al.)?  God’s telling me to give up the detail, and just tell them to love their enemies, because what I’m explaining just isn’t going to work in the minds of future self-centered people who are bias.  He’s telling me that nothing is going to work until the family standard is broken and unprejudiced open sex is fully accomplished.  So, we have to wait for all the bigots to die, and then Cosmopolitan Magazine can create a sexual fad for diversity in looks, age, color, gender, etc.  Because of our high communication skills, mankind is very susceptible to a strong fad (the appreciation and acceptance of others); or, go ahead wear that great looking suit and tie to the next tailgate party.  “Throw me a beer!” Throwing it back, “No, throw it harder!!”  “Yeah!”  Psssssssssss.  “Whoohohhohhhhohhh yeah!!!”  And there are reasons to leave the incest, kids and animals out of it.  Incest causes more of a family bond.  Kids don’t want to do it.  Animals prefer their own kind, and feel they are being raped; and, we can love animals without having sex with them.  We just can’t love other humans unless they are of sexual appeal.  That’s why attractive women can basically drive as fast as they wish.  With no correct guidance from the Church, and in lacking the ability to think, as more people today are opposing the sex-only-in-marriage standard, they are going to sexually go in all directions, finding incest, sex with kids and animals more and more acceptable (right Madonna?).  You’re not going to hate your enemy near as much if they kind of turn you on.  I know it’s totally opposite of yesteryears’ and today’s society’s carved-in-stone church standard.  That why it’s predominated spoken about in the Book of Revelation as a major kind of change.  What else could be so major (other than a big asteroid hit, e.g.)?  And, it would be very easy to accomplish (it is really free for the taking), once that brilliant self-thinking human church leader mindset hurtle is passed (which I agree, is very, very improbable: ask James Dobson).  That’d be like George W. Bush willing to pay restitution to the victims of our aggression.  In fact, a fad / inclination is what thinkers predominately use when deciding matters:  To get a human to start using his thinker in the first place is an accomplishment (that the military strictly does not endorse).  But, when that unique someone who has drifted for his own selfish regard, starts to reckon a more fair or ethical way, it usually always concludes with what they’ve been predominately taught in the first place.  They’ve just deviated from it for their own personal emanation of greed and mistakes.  An “individual’s” values, pride, etc. are not based on (1) what’s truly right and fair, or even for (2) their own personal benefit (or men wouldn’t run at machine guns), it’s all based on fad (what they’ve been predominately taught).  And, I think the fad of running to your death toward a machine gun will eventually lose favor, while people who are free to have diverse sex will never want to go back to the marriage standard.  What do you think?  Come on, entertain me with your dumb comments!

Baseball (all fans would look better in suits and ties):

Oh, again, at various times, I may be speaking at different levels, like at 2nd or 3rd base.  Like first base would be having to explain how the Japanese didn’t bomb Pearl Harbor just for the fun of it, like our ideals have been embedded.  Therefore, you would have to somehow first understand that the Japanese bombed a military base for some kind of (unknown) defensive “reason” (maybe they thought we were developing weapons of mass destruction, and would use them).  I don’t have to know the “reason” to know that they didn’t just want to start a war.  But, most people don’t know this, so if I lose any of you on my 2nd and 3rd base commentary, then I understand why.  I also feel I should keep repeating why I don’t recommend implementing open-sex until there are sufficient cures, etc. for the STDs.  But, please do let me know if I should “repeat” that kind of information every time.  The catch-22 is no political advisor is going to recommend taking the STD control away, while marriage is the standard for child support.  (STDs help keep marriages together.)  So the Pope has to be the one to save the world.  And this latest Pope is still living in 1939 with extreme Nazi prejudice against just homosexuals, so I can’t even imagine how long it will be before the truth about Jesus and marriage is revealed.  A 30-year-old Pope might help a little, but still, the marriage standard has been the rock of the Catholic Church for hundreds of years, and imbedded strongly because of its continuous opposition (God’s powerful force for sex outside of marriage).  Therefore, it will take a superhuman to allow truth to overrule.  I still can’t figure out, though, why humans have so many STDs and fatal ones, while the rats that live under all the houses and buildings in New York City with maximized filth don’t contract any fatal STDs.  This is presuming the rats are having open sex: sex outside of God’s covenant of marriage.  I bet a lot of New Yorkers would love to see all the rats contract and die of some fatal STD while sifting through all that trash all day.  Hmmm.  I’m wondering if we had brains or ethics like rats, would we possibly not have fatal STDs?  Maybe we would have to dig through trash and swim in sewers all day to not get it? – You college graduates out there: let me know.  I’m the idiot, I guess.  For those of you who think God purposely gave us STDs because of our sin of having sex outside of marriage (who are also the people who will state that all 9/11 victims, including firemen, police, etc., had to deserve it): God must want mankind to perish, because He still places a very strong desire, in the majority, to desire sex with those who are not one’s spouse.

One has to be smart to become Pope:

“Well I’m giving up on love, ‘cause love’s given up on me” –Miranda Lambert, 2005.  How can anyone “give up” on God’s greatest gift to Mankind, unless something very powerful is working against it?

http://www.ancientworlds.net/aw/HomesiteRoom/6664, “The Cowboy’s Dream”; Long Branch Saloon; Dodge City, Kansas; 1870s something:

I’m guessing they’re talking about the girl, not the horse.  Too bad duh Pope ain’t uh cowpuncher, or he’duh understand – or he could even “overstand”; because, today, it’s “Everybody says: ‘Save a horse, ride a cowboy’” –Big & Rich, 2000s something.  “An’ this town ain’t never gonna be the same!”  I wonder whose great-great-great grandma is depicted up there?

Can’t figure it out?:

If you have no or a low libido, you probably think this is a very crazy, irrational, and senseless world.

http://www.marriagesolutions.org/, Scientology Marriage Solutions:

Of 55 million marriages in the US, only a fraction are truly stable and happy.

But:

“If you ain't lovin’, than you ain’t livin’” –George Strait, 1988.

“Superficial”:

Looks discrimination in sexual partners.  It’s missing something.  It’s just seeing the surface.  Is there more than what’s on the surface?  Is not seeing beyond the surface, more smart or more dumb?

http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/54_Ways_You_Can_Help_Israel.asp, 54 Ways You Can Help Israel:

20.

Strive to be a better person. Be nice to fellow Jews and fellow human beings [except for folks who are where Jews want to be]. Before you go to sleep each night, go through your day, review your behavior, and resolve what you can do better [move to West Texas]. By setting an example of higher Jewish moral and ethical standards [by lying], we can strengthen the nation of Israel and by extension, the State of Israel.

Congress, Mr. President, understand and respect those who died in the Holocaust, and create a place in the world where Jews can live in safety… in West Texas.  Hey, there’s a town named Enochs with streets ready for Jewish names.  Go for it!  What’s better: more people dying while holding on to cop-outs, or nobody dying and listening to me?  Well, then instead have somebody else in a suit take the credit.

I guess animal emotions are the opposite of intelligence:

Now, when something really bad happens, you’ll say that we should have bombed them more, and I’ll say it happened because we bombed them too much, and never gave any real restitution.  Unless you annihilate each one of them, the more bombin’ you do, the more they’re going to want the get us.  You see, they’re going to be píssed when they are still alive; when they’re all dead, none will be able to get you back until… your afterlife.  Then each one of them will receive full fairness.  It’s a human thing, not a rock thing.  Or, just pray to God that God thinks more like a rock than a human.

Take one step back ladies:

I’ve been hearing a lot more about Dick Cheney lately.  When did he become Vice President?  Probably when they got rid of Dumsfeld.  You know, I had a premonition back in 2000 that George W. Bush would become President and that Dick Cheney would be President after that.  Well, I don’t have much faith in premonitions.  Nor did I know anything about that famous September date.

Busy, busy, busy!

You’re out of bed! You have to do this! You have to do that! You’re in transit! People are informing you! You are informing others! Work, work, work! You’re eating lunch! More, more, more! You’re in transit! Family, family, family! You’re falling asleep.  Sounds like you really don’t have much time to think.  But you do have a very fast learning and comprehending ability.  I should have titled this: Why brainwash works so well.  Or: Why our most educated leaders are still living in the 1950s.

Dirty rotten versus dignified:

When the dirty rotten terrorists kill civilians they are “dumb,” because it just makes them look evil.  When the dignified Americans kill civilians they are “dumb,” because it just makes them look evil.  E.g., Amiriyah civilian shelter, al-Saa restaurant.  Anyone who “picks a side” is therefore dumb (and evil, but mostly dumb).

Illegal aliens who drive drunk and commit crimes:

The “law of averages” simply says this kind of stuff is going to happen, Mr. No Spin guy.

Humans say: Cows, all they do is walk around, eat, and defecate.  The only thing they are good for is to slaughter and eat.

Space aliens say: Humans, all they do is gab and make things for themselves.  The only thing they are good for is to vacuum up to fuel spaceship.

“Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you”:

Could it be… that God has more knowledge then even me… about how truly dumb we really are?  Therefore, a simple one-step-thinking solution must be the only answer.  A good example of this is the Iraq war:  You’re a U.S. military soldier stationed in Iraq.  You’re driving along and a bullet from over there hits your buddy next to you.  Then you go door to door searching for his killer.  Any innocent people you kill in the process are quickly documented as guilty.  Your desire for revenge overwhelms you simply because you aren’t smart enough to realize that you are one of the wrongful invaders.  That’s why God says to love your enemy instead of pursuing him, simply because you are too dumb to realize that you are one of the wrongful invaders.  Therefore, God’s advice is the best.  Mine is pushing the word “fair” to the correct Godly maximum, but cannot work in such an extremely bias world, simply because the human animal is too dumb.  I just personally enjoy letting others know how much smarter I am than they could ever be.

See how it gives the appearance of intelligence?:

It’s eventually going to backfire.

People are “dumb” (unless it’s regarding Ditech home loans).

Workin’ for yourself versus workin’ for others:

Where God provides all the food, land and building materials, one “works for himself” 100%.  An even better system is the barter / money system, where everyone excels in and provides their superior craft or service in exchange for another’s specialty.  But, it’s easy to figure (so the majority won’t get it) that when one starts working for another, unfairness can easily creep in, where one is not working for himself 100% anymore.  That’s why the government should make sure that everyone gets the equivalent to free (organic) food, free land (and clean streams) and free building materials, and probably even more, if there is such a word as “progress” – otherwise nothing has.  It’s apparently a lot worse in the democracy of Mexico, or there wouldn’t be so many crossing the border.  I suggest American leaders start putting more pressure on the Mexican authorities to find a better “fair” pay standard down there.  —But, not to the extent where we start bombing innocent Mexicans.—  Just do it in a fad kind of way, that just makes the Mexican authorities feel like crάp when they continue their greed, pay offs, or whatever it is.  That will make everybody, including O’Reilly (I guess), happy.  Mexican authorities will say that if we pay workers like they do it the United States, then our economy will fall apart.  I’d say, okay, got any examples?  And, I (and Al Gore) say it can even be better.

Has my “widely echoed” teaching about Christian cop-outs seen any results since 1998?:

In 2007, Phil Vassar sings: “Fat cats, just getting fatter, a lot in their pockets. … Eighty bucks to fill my truck. Old man telling me times are tough. Stickin’ it to the middle class. Well, they can kiss my price of gas. It’s time to speak my mind. … I’m just tryin’ to pay my note. … Can you hear me? Hey, yeah, this is my life. … Well, I’m just standing on the edge of the brink. I will not go quietly: I’ll tell you want I think – yeah! [Like this and other complaints are going to make any difference.  You will eventually “go quietly” just like your forefathers did.] It’s time to speak my piece: Squeaky wheel always gets the grease. One single voice don’t matter; but, everybody screaming up the ladder, gonna get the attention of the man on top. Make it louder, shake and rock, and it might just come a tumbling down. Spread all that wealth around!”

Not if Aaron Tippin gets his way: “Hard work pays off the way it should.”  Again, nothing is going to change as long as they don’t fear fair afterlife punishment.  And, nobody even knows about all the free food and free resources that existed here just 200 years ago.  I know what you think, but, e.g., “I” think the cattle ranches / farms upstream should be the ones who pay to purify your water.  If all the other meat eaters want to chip in, then so be it.  I’m getting tired of paying for it! – Just because everybody’s an idiot.  Somebody tell Ted Nugent to quit supporting the cost of our water.  We vegetarians don’t crap in his backyard!  “Where Do You Draw The Line?”  If Ted wants to be fair, then he shouldn’t eat any vegetarian animals!  Then it’d be “Dog Eat Dog,” or a little “Cat Scratch Fever.”  Help New York by eating all their “Street Rats” “Primitive Man.”  “Bite Down Hard” cause meat takes a lot more chewing to get down our throats, or you’ll feel like you’ve been “Bound And Gagged.”   Without guys like Ted, water would be “Free-For-All.”  “Ain’t It The Truth”?  Most say “Funk U” because the rock community considers you a “Fallen Angel” or better a “Habitual Offender.”  Fox News loves it when someone from the rock community is on their side (“Good Friends And A Bottle Of Wine”).  “I Want To Tell You,” eventually there will be laws against eating animals, so you’ll have to continually hear those Animal Rights people say, “I Won’t Go Away.”  “I’ll Prove I’m Right”:  “Just Do It Like This”: If we could just take a “Journey To The Center Of The Mind,” you’d realize “God” sees the “Land Of A Thousand Dances” and “Things Goin’ On” like a “Magic Party” in the minds of all animals; like a “Lean Mean Rock ‘N’ Roll Machine”; even the ones “Living In The Woods.”  Only an idiot can’t hear animals sayin’ “No, No, No!”  To “Separate The Men From The Boys, Please,” I assure you, the Goldenrule is much more difficult to achieve.  Jesus, “Tied Up In Love,” did not say, “My Love Is Like A Tire Iron,” or cop-out with “No Holds Barred” like a Protestant.  So expect some “Sweet Revenge” in your afterlife, where “You Can’t Get Away.”  I’m telling you in advance, so “You Better Believe It.”  In the end, you’ll be singing to Jesus: “You Talk Sunshine, I Breathe Fire.”  “High Enough”?  So instead, “Name Your Poison” and tell Toby “Let’s Go Get Stoned” so y’all will be able to have your “Wango Tango” without needing to accomplish your definition of “fair.” !.

http://www.ivu.org/history/native_americans.html, History of Vegetarianism: Native Americans and Vegetarianism:

George Catlin, the famous nineteenth century Indian historian, described the Choctaw lands of southern Oklahoma in the 1840's this way: "...the ground was almost literally covered with vines, producing the greatest profusion of delicious grapes,...and hanging in such endless clusters... our progress was oftentimes completely arrested by hundreds of acres of small plum trees...every bush that was in sight was so loaded with the weight of its...fruit, that they were in many instances literally without leaves on their branches, and quite bent to the ground... and beds of wild currants, gooseberries, and (edible) prickly pear." …

More than one tribe has creation legends which describe people as vegetarian, living in a kind of Garden of Eden. A Cherokee legend describes humans, plants, and animals as having lived in the beginning in "equality and mutual helpfulness". The needs of all were met without killing one another. When man became aggressive and ate some of the animals, the animals invented diseases to keep human population in check. The plants remained friendly, however, and offered themselves not only as food to man, but also as medicine, to combat the new diseases.
I once heard about meat being fed to a rabbit and it killed it.  I think humans have built up a tolerance for it.  Why else does one get sick when one goes months without eating meat, then has a big steak?  Hunt consistently Ted, or you might just discover some reality (that “Rot Gut” would be a “State Of Shock”?).  So, when you say: “I Got The Fellin’,” I don’t need no human “All Revved Up With No Place To Go” also crappin’ “Out Of Control” “Below The Belt” in my backyard, while you can hardly wait to get “Just What The Doctor Ordered.”  “Don’t Look Around” because your kids are doin’ it directly in the creek under the “Bridge Over Troubled Daughters.”  But, oh “That Smell.”  Don’t send us anymore “Homebound” defecation, or I’ll end up with that “Paralyzed” feeling in the bathroom, like I’m in a “Stranglehold” baby, I’d best get out of your way!

Hey Ted, if you would like those “Sweet P○○ntang” animal rights people to “get mellow, you can turn around and get the f₪ck outta here, alright! Do you hear me!?!”

Great Words of Wisdom:

We’re all idiots.  Hey, I do dumb things all day also.  Haven’t you ever done or said something dumb but didn’t realize it at the time, but later realized it?  Well, you’re still doing and thinking dumb things and may never realize it.  So, just realize that.

(By the way, I use the word “dumb” in its modern sense equating to the word “stupid” or “markedly lacking [or limited] in intelligence,” not in its etymological sense of inarticulate in speech or appearance, or “uneducated”; and in severance to the words “evil” or “unethical.”  Plus it’s only one syllable.)

The New Iraq Strategy Plan:

Listening to Fox News commentators discussing the plan for the new Iraqi government, sure sounds intelligent, well thought out, devised in good faith, and surely will make Iraq a better place to live.  Devised by the highest educated, top-of-the-world intelligence.  But, they’ve forgotten about all the Iraqi Toby and Willies.  You see, we have forgotten all about our 2003 violent invasion; so why can’t Iraqis just forget about it too?  We forgot about Hitler when he invaded France, Great Britain, Poland, etc., so why can’t those Iraqis just sit down and listen to reason?

Duke rape case:

They are lucky they had evidence proving their were innocence; because, one is innocent until proven guilty in this great country.  Which is a joke.  All “smart” judges will disagree.  The public censuring of Mike Nifong will certainly stop about half of all other prosecutors from railroading innocent people, for a couple of more years anyway.  That should ease some of the large prison population we have in this country.  “Frivolous” cases like Warren Jeffs’ may have to wait for a while.

Articulate:

People have commented about my use of too many commas, etc.  I try to use a comma between words that together could cause interpretation in a difference sense, but I know lots of professional writers feel it impresses more suits to leave out as many commas as possible, knowing fast readers / fast comprehenders don’t need the comma there.  I read their kind of stuff all the time – where my mind has to rehash the sentence to determine which version makes more sense than the other, with the context.  Articulates can apparently do this process much faster.  Or, articulate writers already know the meaning of their sentence, and therefore don’t need the comma when rereading it, but don’t realize a new reader doesn’t always pre-know same.  Regardless, I will still use “too many” commas, etc. because, when the time’s right, I plan to publish all my writings to the Web, and it will all be ready for the average Joe to comprehend quicker.  My writings are dated, and I need to wait for more people to ignore some of my points before I go public, to have better leverage for subsequent points.  Example: “I say to you, today you will be with Me in Paradise.” or  “I say to you today, you will be with Me in Paradise.”  Early Greek lacked punctuation.  So where should the comma be?  Likely the first one, but it’s not certain.  Also, someone please let me know, when magazines and newspapers use a pronoun to refer to two possible subjects, is there some kind of rule that I can’t figure out saying whether the pronoun is referring to the last mentioned or second to last mentioned subject, or just to the subject who is being discussed the most, or is it the least?  E.g.:  Ed went to the store.  Bob rode along with him.  He got a new toolset.  Which person is “he” referring to?  It could be either.  But I have to read / hear stuff like this all the time, whether it be drug prescription information, to watching movies, whatever.  I think they know who they’re referring to, but are unable to surmise that I don’t know who they’re referring to.  And if you have to ask, then you look like the idiot.  The amount of improvements to the Windows operating system and the Windows Office line, and computer software in general are too numerous to mention.  And, that’s in areas where ethics isn’t the cause of most of the problems.  If I ever get the time, I’d like to write a program that would simply keep cars from running into each other on the road.  It would have to include a GPS in all cars and an automated override in controlling the car at certain times.  If I don’t do it, it will be 200 to 400 years before someone else thinks of it.  It can also include a button to just drive you there while you take a nap or talk on your cell phone.  Let’s just see you try to deliberately drive into someone else’s car or off the road, after that.  Have it eventually detect and compensate for road weather conditions, hills, chair in the road, etc.  You could even turn it completely off and just drive yourself, just like you would today (not recommended though).  Well, I’m on third base here, so just keep on having pile-ups, so I can boast in the future how they could have all been prevented.  Remember, you might be driving perfect, but that other guy ….  Cops could override a vehicle’s system and force someone trying to get away to just ride themselves to the police station.  And can initiate it by just knowing the vehicle’s general location.  You may have to eventually let a lot of others out of jail that got pulled in with him.  But, you’d quickly find the guy with the loot.  You say, what if the guy takes off on foot?  Well, it’d be something like what I heard once about how a woman can never rightly accuse a man of rape, because a woman can run much faster with dress up than a man with pants down.  (Must have heard that a loooong time ago.)  So, get more CHiPs.

If I ever get the time, it’d also be fun to write a four-dimensional computer mapping program that allows us to look back in time.  It’d incorporate some uniquely built energy scanners, with even higher resolution directional detection input.  Our brains are constantly doing this same thing, or we wouldn’t be able to remember what we did yesterday, 20 years ago, etc.  We would be able to scan any object to see its entire geographic / location history.  (You see, all matter emanates in vibrations / trails [size / intensity location time trails] from the center of the universe.  Its size-degrees-of-intensities and directions of energy is like a reverse image of where it’s been.  You may find when you turn a different direction, it might be a tad bit easier to remember certain things.)  Then, in 1000 years, if you can see it, you can recreate it: then “the dead will be able to come out of their graves.”  “Resurrection” as Jesus / God promised.  (I don’t recommend getting cremated and having your ashes spread all over the ocean.)  But right now, I need to spend all of my time in trying to keep the world from ending.  Well, it will be “just a copy” of you, but your buddies will think you’re you, and you will think you’re you, so when “you” resurrect the way “you think” you will (otherwise), what’ll be the difference?  Either way, you’ll be able to do what you want to do, and what you want done will get done, you’ll be able to experience added futuristic pleasures and happinesses the same, so try to explain to me the difference?  And, sorry: initially you’ll still be the same way you were, and will therefore still have to face judgment, and in down-deep fair satisfaction to the others you once wronged (when you hurt their innocence).  Then nobody will have to force themselves to try to forgive, which would otherwise not really work (as it doesn’t today), and would end up causing problems.  (I’m talking like at fifth base, but some of you might know what I’m talking about.)  Basically, people of the future will not let you walk freely in a society when others, down deep or subconsciously, have “legitimate” gripes against you.  It’d make a perfect world imperfect.  Once you’ve suffered all things equally, those you’ve wronged won’t have a legitimate gripe any longer.  You see, final logic (to make it a perfect world) will cause people to be able to forgive those who have rightfully wronged them; then likewise, in balance, will logically always be allowed to have a grudge against those who wronged them unjustly.  In today’s society, people can’t forgive those who wronged them whether it was justified or not.  And, everyone today thinks it’s okay to hurt an innocent person, whenever it’s to their advantage.  Today, it’s pretty much whatever you can get away with, as your determining factor (even though many don’t believe that).  That will have to change to make the future ethically perfect.  Both Bush Presidents and other war mongers are going to have to suffer equally the pain and deaths of an awful lot of Iraqis… legitimately.  That’s why they surely don’t believe in “fair” afterlife punishment, or they’d go crazy.  Every day the toll increases, so that’s proof they don’t believe what Jesus “assured” in Matt. 5:23-26.  If I was either of them, I would do everything I could possibly do to try to lessen the amount of innocent Iraqis (and Americans) being continually hurt, who are being hurt because something at one time seemed to be to their (the Bushes’) advantage; and, give as much restitution to the living as possible.  Since that’s only me, Jesus, and logic speaking, I’m sure that’s not powerful enough to sink in.  “Brainwash” has always prevailed, simply because we are all too “dumb.”  But, brainwash today is not going to justify anyone in future perfection, when all the legitimate gripes come down the pike.  You will be caught like a rat in the corner on every one of them (in the eyes of your past victims).  But, (you are smart enough to know) not today.  You see, once perfection is realized that one is never justified in hurting an innocent person, then people will be free to do a lot more things, but part of that mandates strict penalties against those who wrong the innocent (i.e.: equal punishment).  And that’s right, if the hurt you force upon an innocent is not as bad as the gain you will achieve, then go ahead and hurt the innocent, because your later “equal punishment” will not outweigh your present gain.  Even if you have to hurt one innocent person to save the lives of two other innocent people, you will still have to equally suffer the blow to the one innocent (otherwise, you’re justifying 9/11) *.  But I think people will be quickly finding other ways to reach their gains while not having to hurt any innocents.  Like it’s pretty easy to figure that either Bush would not have killed all those innocents for their glorious gain (today: of not having to admit they were wrong) if they had the slightest idea they would eventually have to suffer equally.  They will find that each innocent death they’ve caused will be millions of times more painful then their saving of face.  And, in this Iraq war, it looks like they’re even losing the face anyway.  And, ignoring my warnings or having my human assed kicked is not going to change it.

* How would you like to be unknowingly given experimental drugs that gives you cancer, by a hospital wishing to cure a disease for benefit and lives others?  You’d say “No, find another method”?  Well, those doctors and hospital people will suffer equally.  Jesus says, “Therefore do not fear them.  For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.” –Matthew 10:26.  Now, the first thing a church will teach you is the God can do anything.  But Jesus says it cannot be accomplished in the present, but in the future tense.  Or, how would you like to be crippled for the rest of your life, just because the Soviets had to blow up the house next door to you, to kill some key American insurgents, who were sore about Russia taking over the U.S. Government in 1982?  Would you realize the importance of some Soviet leader’s pride and need to save face?

When your debts are people, then they’re going to come back to life.

Democrats (that’s something you all know about):

The American people and the Democrats are saying they’re going to get rid of all the Bush, O’Reilly, etc. conservative bigots who are still living in the 1950s.  But, I reckon, after about a year into the new President, we can look forward to seeing the Democrats turn into the same conservative bigots who are still living in the 1950s; but, the difference is, they will not be aware of it.  So which is really better?  Generally Republicans are more evil than Democrats, but they are likewise smarter than Democrats.  I’d rather work with smarter than dumber.  The only thing dumber than a Democrat leader is the American people.  That includes news commentators.  Being President is like running a zoo:  If you care, you really have to know how to properly take care of all the animals.  Same if you are Pope.

What’d be cool is:

If the IRS would add a box to check if you supported the 2003 Iraq invasion; which would cause you to pay a much higher tax, so to be fair in who has to pay for it.  Then I think we’d be surprised how many people were originally against the war.  Toby, Aaron, Sean, etc. were all against the war? – Amazing!  It’ll look like George acted alone.  We’d find out quickly that they can talk real big when it comes to brainwashing our youth into sacrificing their lives, but if the reality hit their pocket book, then….  If you disagree, then all of you who supported the war can prove me wrong by simply voluntarily contributing (greatly) to a war fund.  It’s really not such a bad idea considering how many people in this country are anti-war.  So Fox News will surely show its pride by creating an Iraq war fund for all of its listeners to contribute to.  Not gonna happen, eh?  If we let the real war mongers be the only ones who have to pay the bill, I bet we’ll see a lot less invasions.  Not gonna happen, eh?  Well, we could begin a fund for restitution, so to make America safer from terrorism.  Not gonna happen, eh? – Well I hope I can say the same about future terrorist attacks, eh?

What’d even be cooler:

Like ending the military draft, having war financed only from a separate fund donated only by those who want it, is not only the fair way to do it, but will likely encourage other methods of getting along to be sought.  Being able to start a war just using the general tax fund, and just because you have a personal vendetta against someone who wasn’t even a threat is something any President in the future can easily do.  It’s like, in the future, when we cause some country to not like us (e.g., bombing their civilians works the best), since we pride the highest of cowards, we will inform their leader that in America a man is innocent until “proven” guilty.  So we’ll ask them if they have or are developing any WMDs, and they’d better have “proof” that they don’t, or we’ll have good cause to wag.  And, most Americans will “just” believe it.  And, even after the fact, because they will vote him back in.  “Dumb,” there’s no better word for it.  If our enemy is setting up catapults around our border, just because they have a personal vendetta against a handful of our leaders (the “stated” reason for 9/19), then the handful of leaders better have enough money to cover the bill.  A lot of people don’t know this, but we can replace a handful of leaders very easily.  We do it ourselves every 4 to 8 years.  Plus… it just might cause the handful of leaders to have just a little bit more concern for not killing “innocent” people, when needing to stop someone (an outside leader) who plans to kill innocent people.  Don’t worry, if the catapults are being set up for our gold, women and MTV, then many more will be happy to contribute to the voluntary war fund.  I guarantee it.  With this Iran thing, I say let the people who don’t want to “just” treat them good, pay the bill for the invasion.  Then they just might find that treating someone good is a whole lot cheaper than an invasion.  Especially, when they decide to fight back after we’ve taken their city, basing it on the word “fair” when it comes down to who has the right to have WMDs and who doesn’t.  Then Americans who want to actually follow Jesus (instead of just His name), by instead simply wishing a Goldenrule with Iran, won’t have to pay the bill.  Now, I realize other world leaders (and terrorists) don’t know this kind of stuff either, so send me their emails and I’ll be glad to add them to my list.  Then we’ll have to make sure we don’t invade any other country if we just want to assassinate their one leader.  Years ago, people thought that if we became pacifists, and didn’t try to get everyone in the world before they got us, then surely the most evil of leaders and/or systems of government would be in control of the world.  Well, we’re far to dumb to realize it, but the United States is the most evil war machine in the entire world.  At best, Hitler could have only made himself equal to the United States, because the holocaust of the American Indian and the taking of land from Mexico, isn’t any less than Hitler’s invasions and the holocaust of the Jews, duh.  The only difference might be, is if the percentage of German people who were aware of Hitler’s evil, would be greater than the percentage of American’s who think our leaders were evil, then Hitler’s “light” of his evil, would be better than our extensive “darkness” of our same kind of evil.  Ironically, this great “darkness” in a free speech society is caused by the mass media who “prefer” to not say much about little issues like “slant drilling.”  And, this little “great darkness” actually was the cause of George W. Bush’s ability to fuel his personal vendetta.  Which backfired “some” things into “light.”  So, even with a media who prefers things in darkness, light will continually break through, but at a very slow rate.  “Learning the hard way” is another thing God probably knows more about concerning us, than I. – So my temporary intelligent and rational logic, which will die when I die, may just be delaying the needed future (embedded) “light.”  With Iran, I think just a few kind words would do it.  I could have kind words all my life for one of my blood brothers, but I “could” still shoot/kill him if he planned to kill one of my other blood brothers.  “Brothers”… I recall that word in the Bible… the book where God speaks. – You atheists are going to have a hard time convincing me there’s no God.  Let’s see: Saddam Hussein and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are both George W. Bush’s “brothers.”  George W. Bush believes he is a devoted “Christian.”  ….  ….  I’m sorry people: “dumb” is the best word to use.  Every time a terrorist kills an American in Iraq, that “light” becomes just a little bit brighter.  And it will be a good light for mankind, because that kind of light lasts much longer then things like my logic.  You see, “logic” is “difficult” to emotionally understand; a bullet in your neighbor kid’s back is “easier” to emotionally understand.  Correlating that with an invasion of another country (Iran) takes still a two-step thinking process, so most people still aren’t going to get it.  I think we need to invade a couple of more countries based on our “fair” WMD reasoning, so three or four steps can equate to “two” in the human mind.  Don’t listen to the Goldenrule or the word “brother”: all churches say you don’t need it to get to heaven.  How many thinking steps does it take for the churches to realize they (their cop-outs) are the base cause for the wars?  About three?  So, the fond memory of Billy Graham will live on for a very long time.  “Dumb”: there’s no better word for it.  And, in need of a true leader, who can tell them that.  In America, it will get them to “consider.”  But he’s not going to be voted in.

You think Hitler was bad:

U.S. military leaders used to display scalps, breasts, and other genitalia of, and even human fetuses from, U.S. slaughtered Indian women along with smashed skulls of Indian children in Denver saloons and opera house, c. 1864, with much applause.  Well… they were on our land!  Yes, it wasn’t that long ago when Americans enjoyed those kinds of exhibits.  I think Hitler would have gotten a worse reputation if he’d exhibited Jewish parts, but not us.  Hitler was just one evil thinker, we’re an entire country full of many individuals who are proud to be evil.  (And we would slaughter every Indian today, if we thought it was to our advantage.  I can visualize Hannity right now pressing the cause.)  Plus, today’s Americans who want to be free the most (city gangs), could get some ideas there.  I once heard a local story about a guy that was arrested hiding in the back seat of a woman’s car at a convenience store, because he was required to bring in a white woman’s head to join a gang.  You betcha I blame it on our cop-out church, in about a four-step thinking sequence.  There can be no better Antichrist than the Protestant Church: they don’t say everything wrong, they know how to say just enough.  A church that would say everything wrong could not be near as destructive, because their wrongs would be too apparent.

They say Italians were the great chefs, the French were the great lovers, Germans the great minds (don’t wrong great minds), and the British were the great conquerors.  And the United States simply took over the British roll.  Likely because America’s forefathers were Europe’s worst of the worst, needing to flee the civilized world.  Whether it be pirate or Protestant, it’s all about the same.  One just appears evil while the other doesn’t.  And white collar evil harms to a much greater extent that can blue collar (apparent) evil.  So, “dumb” is most critical thing for us to overcome.

I think both Bush Presidents should give civilians a choice whether they want to be shot and scalped for all to see, or just burned to death from a dropped bomb.  Well, one way would better educate and show the results of war, and the other would get a President re-elected.  The American people: “dumb” is the most correct word to call them.  “Dumb” explains a lot of today’s problems, but definitely wouldn’t get you voted in.  So, somehow let me do it, behind the scenes (or I’d just get beaten to death).  Ah, you’re too dumb to consider it.  I think I know what’s going on, and the definition of the word “catch-22.”  If you accurately told the general public that they were dumb, what kind of problem would that cause?  The only problem would be the end of your selfish career after they blackballed you.  So, see, none of you have God as number one.  But, I really don’t recommend any of you telling the general public how dumb they are, simply because you are too dumb to correctly explain the details why, and will just making yourself look like the dumb one.

Bronco fans say:

Hey Mr. Critical, there’s no evidence that shows the early residents of Denver where slanted:

The only good fish is a live fish:

What I used to like to do is tell the restaurant to bring my salmon to me alive so I can kill it at the table.  I’d take it out of the water and watch it squirm for life until it didn’t show anymore indications of pain.  Then I’d tear it apart with my claws and fangs.  Everyone would comment how humane I was by not letting it suffocate in a net with hundreds of other fish on top of it.  How would you like to be crushed in addition to being suffocated?  Learn to be nice!  Try to be a Christain!  Sometimes I’d get a wild hair, use a needle, hold it and poke out its eyes to watch how its mouth would react.  There’s “one.”  Oh boy!  There’s “two.”  Oops, I missed, there’s “two.” (Well it was fighting me too much.)  Yeah, cool – look mom!  Are we having fun yet?  Then I’d put it back in the bowl to watch it run into things.  Why not? – I’m the smart human and it’s the dumb fish.  I’m the big rock star now.  Instead of being nice, I have the power to be cruel and selfish, so let’s just see somebody trying to stop me!  I sure am fortunate my church says I only have to say some words to myself to enter Heaven – a place for only good people. 

I needed a break:

The other day I went up to the box office and said to the gal: “Live free or die hard.”  Then out popped a ticket saying same.  I said, “No, that’s just my philosophy about life.  I’ll take two tickets to see Evan Almighty.”  Then, after the show, when we where leaving, I went up to the second window and said to the guy, “Sicko!”  Then he punched me in the nose.  I said, “No, no, no!  I just need to see that Michael Moore movie about America’s Health Care debauchery.” … “No, it’s not about those doctors who have sex with those nurses in those hospitals. – What are you, a Factor guy?  …  I think sex in hospitals is a very important subject to inform the American public about: when a doctor has me opened up, I want him to be sexually frustrated and shaky.  We’re just true Christians and don’t just walk in to another movie without paying.”  Boy, I sure wish I could afford medical insurance with this broken nose.  And now, even if I win the lottery, I can’t get insurance with this pre-existing condition.

Puzzling questions:

Why do I always think about Sean Hannity every time an SUV is shinning its brights in my back window, tailgating me, while I’m already cruising five over the speed limit?

Mitt Romney:

Don’t tell me I’m the only one who can see that this guy isn’t working with a full deck.  “Tiptoe through the tulips with me” should be his campaign slogan.

Ding, ding – I am slow:

With elbow on knee and chin on fist, finally I figured out the best way to separate and force those who supported the war to pay for it, and its needed restitution.  By November of 2004, we had a pretty good idea what the Iraq war was all about, and I think the confidential records exist which tell who voted for Bush.  So, have the IRS assess an added tax against those who voted for Bush in 2004 (not 2000), because their vote for Bush indicates they, down deep, support the war.  And, that would even allow exclusion of those who supported the war in 2003 for WMD reasons.  Why should guys like me and the like have to pay the bill?  Where’s the fairness in that O’Reilly?  None of this aggression is protecting me, it’s just making more and more people want to kill me, that’s all.  Fully, those should additionally pay me for having that much more terrorism to have to worry about.  Only the IRS, the bank, and the individual would know about the added tax, so it can stay otherwise confidential.  Yeah, let’s get the liberals to push for this one.  Just the idea of it will probably stop other frivolous attacks as well, and would likely encourage more to support a withdraw.  Personally, I don’t care if our troops stay or withdraw from Iraq.  All I say is to be fair and give the Iraqi people restitution (including those who retaliate).  I do, however, think there’s a lot better chance of some sort of self government to establish itself in Iraq once we are gone, because it will appear like we will be giving the Iraqi people the freedom to run their own country instead of today’s obvious assumption that any Iraqi military or police are really just working for us (the violent invaders). – Because I understand there are many insurgent attacks against Iraqi military or police.  Plus, since we were (really) in the wrong, we shouldn’t even be somewhere where we don’t have the moral right to even kill someone in self-defense (unless you can only see through a pig’s eye).  I think we have opened the gates for a civil war in Iraq, so just give more restitution to those who don’t participate in that.  We really do have a very high moral bill to pay since my February 1998 advice was not followed (or stayed followed).  Now, I’m taking about this “restitution” while standing on second base.  Once things start going bang again within our borders, people will start to consider it.  It makes sense that a self-imposed Iraqi government (one that is established proving no American influence) may not approve but would not strongly object to radicals like al-Qaeda setting up safe-haven there, realizing the obvious sentiment of the Iraqi people.  There, they will have the time and resources needed to develop WMDs.  (I don’t know if our other enemies would help supply them.  Maybe in secret.)  Most Iraqis would just want to go to work, the store, etc. and stay out of it, but would not be interested at all in putting up too much of a fight against radical organizations wishing revenge against the United States, unless the United States could secretly set up some kind of dictator to take control of Iraq, because “democracy” and letting people vote or have their say, would not be advisable.  For example, setting up a safe-haven in, say, Pakistan would not be as easy or as “safe” since most Pakistanis don’t have a major grievance against the United States.  So, by not following my February 1998 advice, Clinton and Bush have created a much more secure safe-haven for terrorists one way or the other.  Since our goal was to do the opposite, can I call anybody “dumb”?  (You news people where just as gung-ho about removing Saddam Hussein in 2003.  Instead of that little slant-drilling issue.)  As the war continues, I think more and more Americans are going to express their opposition and escalate pressure for a pull out.  As the war continues, I think we’re going to create more and more enemies over there.  So, “You ain’t seen nothing yet” –Bachman-Turner Overdrive, 1974.  (I’d be glad to just shut-up if someone wanted to force me to.)  Bush is even losing O’Reilly on the pull-out issue.

Ignoring a restitution plan (which is admitting how dumb and evil we really are), Bush is probably saying to himself: “I really don’t know what to do.”  I just think God is really rubbing it in, to better emphasis the importance of my February 1998 “How would Jesus do it?” advice.  Contrary to what Fox News reports, things are really getting much worse in Iraq.  And, I told you all that we’d have problems with the people of Iraq if we ousted Saddam Hussein with a violent invasion.  But, I didn’t know it’d be this bad.  My intelligent advice is apparently even greater than I even know.

If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands.  ! !  If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands.  ! !  If you're happy and you know it, and you really want to show it, if you're happy and you know it, clap your hands. ! ! 

I’m happy out my important February 1998 advice!

Intelligence of our highest educated:

Deep in the mind of the President (and many Fox News commentators), they know that people are either “good” or “bad,” just like the church teaches (one extreme or the other).  And as soon as we kill all the “bad” Iraqis we will win the war and there will be no more problems, simply because only “good” Iraqis will be alive.  Of course, a “bad” Iraqi is one who retaliates against violent invaders who just killed their brother or sister, like Toby and Willie would do over here.  A “good” Iraqi would be one who doesn’t even get angry and realizes America’s glorious purpose, and the good we’ve done for their country, justifies the killing of their brother or sister.  Good luck.

12-year-old caught stealing 25-cent candy cigar:

He has since apologized to the store owner, gave his allowance to charity, did extra chores around the house for punishment, and is awaiting a good scolding from the judge.  And I’m sure he gave restitution to the store owner (which seemed to go without saying).

http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070712/OPINION/707120391/-1/OPINION05, Candy shop owner teaches sweet lesson:

“In a world full of hypocrites and adults who shed responsibility as easily as snakes shed their skin, it's nice to see one adult who can still clearly express the difference between right and wrong and to see one 12-year-old boy who will grow into a better man because of it.”  Now, if this country could see fit that the Iraqis just get the “restitution,” then we can equate as far as I am concerned.  When a “criminal” steals or breaks something in this country “restitution” is always the first consideration by our courts.  But, our true colors as a nation are fully being shown regarding the ignoring of restitution for the Iraqi people.

Saddam's promise: "Mother of all wars" coming true:

Our current Iraq problem emanates from Saddam Hussein’s demand for fairness concerning the 1990 slant drilling issue, et al., and our subsequent invasion.  Many Americans laughed and scorned this statement, but now its reality is beginning to take shape, especially if/when the war escalates to nuclear, biological and/or chemical weapons; which could certainly lead to the end of the world.  We need to begin a restitution campaign before that starts.  But we won’t, so it’s bound to happen.  And when it happens, Saddam Hussein will be “laughing best.”  Conservatives will start saying: “Bring back the draft, we need more soldiers to stop the insurgency.”  But that will just cause more Iraqis to become insurgents since fairness is on their side.  “Dumb” (never admitting fault) is not the answer for this Iraq / Muslim thing.  It just works best for wealthy Americans against unwealthy dumber Americans.  Or should I say “…unwealthy stupider Americans”?  Or, let’s really make it long by saying “…unwealthy Americans who are more stupid.”  Maybe “…unwealthy Americans who are not as intelligent”?  I’ll just say “unwealthy unintelligenter Americans.”  You know the Ancient Greek language, has these kinds of forms available.  English is kind of a condensed language.

Who wants to stay boss?:

With all the problems we’re having in Iraq, it’s just getting difficult for America to “just have its way” by “just invading” any country we want.  Even if we nuke their entire country, others would surely greatly oppose.  We’d have to eventually nuke all of Asia.  (George would do it if it would help him save face.)  I suggest we send Israel to West Texas, get on good terms with Iran, pull out of Iraq and let Iran take it over (there’s your dictator).  Oh, but we’d have to not let the Jews have their religious cop-out, and we’ll have to forget about that 1979 hostage situation.  So, never mind that I even mentioned it.  Plus, we still might have to give restitution to the Iraqi people anyway.  I think the best thing is to stay the course until all the people of the United States are dead and gone (they won’t “just stop” once it starts moving), then whoever takes over may have learned something that we never learned.  Well, that’s one way to make a better world.

We’re the young generation, and we’ve got somethin’ to say.” –The Monkees, 1966:

The loud, wild and crazy rock music which grew out the 1960s counterculture, was (1) “Wild and crazy” (also in appearance) because we needed to let them know we’re out here, man; and (2) “Loud” because we needed them to be able to hear us!  Right?  (Today we have bloggers … … We’d better turn the volume back up.)  People involved in it were to be “cool,” man.  Not to be a “Stepping Stone” for the man (the latest “man,” who was re-elected in 2004); and, hunting down innocent animals is about as uncool as one can be!  “Peace” doesn’t correlate with the violence of shooting an animal to death.  Now, try to be a believer. so God’s animals can also have a “Pleasant Valley Sunday.”  Logic says history will eventually record you as very “uncool”… man.  I know how humans are down deep, you know: once they’re not dumb and are fully conscious of what animal slaughter and hunting is really all about.  They abolished slavery and now have equal rights.  The Bible says the meek will inherit the earth, not the aggressive.

Give me that guitar, I’ll show you how to do it:

Move over Sweaty Teddy, and let Jimi take over. – The Place: Woodstock ’69; The song: The one before Purple Haze.  A song that should get some political attention.  Quit your bloggin’, open the windows, and just crank it up, baby!  I can’t work alone you know!  (It even sounds loud with the volume set on low.)  And if you want to be seen (in The Summer of Free Love), you’ve got to literally set your guitar on fire, down in Monterey.  So if you ever guitar’d of your bull shίt, bust apart your guns and archery sets on stage… man.  I bet when you were little, when another kid was playing with a toy you wanted, you’d just grab it – didn’t you?  And, nobody is for this Iraq war unless they’re just a big coward.  Being “strong” is worrying about others’ possible aggression, instead of hurting weaker innocent people.  And, by far, being “tough” is not hurting weaker innocent creatures.  A “man” can do these things, where you can’t.  You think it’s the other way around because you are “dumb” – No better reason.

I just never got along with that drug crowd:

My personality apparently just didn’t entertain.  Lucky for me?  Darn right: lucky for me!

Say no to drugs: 

But, I don’t think they should necessarily be illegal.  I think many could be “legal” but regulated with an accurate warning message on every box.  And, a sign at the point of sale that list testimonials and pictures from people who have been harmed by using the stuff.  If people want to take it that bad, then the situation needs to be reanalyzed, more than just an egg frying in a pan.  In an open sex society, with free food, shelter, etc. for everyone with no shame or guilt, adding a work system that pays in fairness, more people are going to be enthused about their life and won’t need these kind of drugs anyway.

Same with casinos:

They should mandate that all casinos display a conspicuous sign at their entrance, and on each advertisement, telling the total amount of gross earnings the casino has taken in, listed with the amount paid to winners (with frequent state auditing).  Then display in bigger letters the amount difference of the overall customer loss, with the percentage.  (And if you let Mr. Critical write the end of it, it will say: “So, Come On In And Have A Good Time, Stupid!”)  That might not stop the ones who know when to quit, or the ones who just go for fun, because they’ve got plenty to lose, I’m just thinking about the people who try to double their life saving so they can pay the rent.  There should be “freedom” to be an idiot (gamble), and freedom to correctly inform same (a sign, schools).  Either way I think each state and/or city (the people who approved the casino) should have something like a bankruptcy law, for only those who can show the casino took their necessary money.   Not the kind of bankruptcy where the idiot’s creditors don’t get paid, but where the fine people who approved the casino pay the debtors.  If the fine people don’t like it, they can just oust the casino.  Well, it would be the fair and moral thing, because we’ll always have idiots, but we might not always have casinos.  If you make the casino pay the idiots’ bills, then the casino will find a way to not let the idiots into the casino, even in the first place.  Some kind of proof of income or something would be necessary.  You say, that’s an oxymoron method of regulating the casinos: how’s it gambling if the loser gets it back?  Well, I’d say it’d be the kind of regulation that might make the casino want to do business elsewhere.  But, they could certainly have the freedom to stay if they want.  They’d just have to make sure no low income persons lose even more, that’s all.  It would be the kind of regulation that would determine if the casino is really just making money off the guys who know when to quit, and the folks who have plenty to lose.  Which, ethically, are the only two kinds who should be in there.  Maybe even have the mandatory high school courses explain the dark evil of casinos: how it appears in darkness you will win when overall you won’t.  I’m all for bringing what’s dark, into light.  Of course, if schools start taking about ethics and about what’s really good for the individual, then the rich man knows it will eventually reach into his pocketbook:  And, there are still a lot of Hannitys out there, even though most watch other stations thinking they are more liberal (generous).  I still think I could change Hannity quicker than someone who just thinks they are a good person.  You see, the person who just thinks they are righteous, will quickly tell me they don’t need my lecture because they are already a fair and decent human being, while they’re eating that meat.

(I bet more than anything else, that added statement on the sign by Mr. Critical would end a lot of gambling problems.  So, just regulate it in:  And I mean “just.”  And, “just” have the sign printed on both sides, so if it doesn’t work the first night they walk in, it will the night they walk out with less than what they went in with.  Or, just seeing the sign listing how much the casinos had taken overall from its customers, should irritate some reality into their mindless emotions.  Get a picture of me laughing at them on their way out too, to help make the salt go deep into the wound.  Hey, there is a reason why they crucified Christ.  Find a picture of Noah Webster laughing, overlay my arm around him with us both pointing to a scan of his dictionary definition of “fool.”)

As usual, I’m not talkin’ here about stuff that will be made into law, I’m talkin’ here about stuff that would really work!

The Windows Vista drag:

Basically, what we have is, everything computer programs have accomplished up to 2006, are not going to work on Windows Vista.  Therefore, why would anybody really want it?  Bill Gates only wants everybody to buy all new so he and his allies can stretch more money out of their faithful past loyal users (justified by speeding up some of the gaming software); which is going to slow “progress” overall more than help it.  “Compatibility” should be priority:  They should just fix bugs, and add new good stuff, like more options.  Next generation technology should be, first of all, optimized, then sold in addition to compatible OS’s that are updated to work with the old.  That would give a Freedom of Choice, instead of dictating it for them.  Try to be what America brags about, not what it really is.  Of course, any more, they know that “compatibility” is 99% of what the people want, and speed for gamers is about 1%.  That’s why they have to force Vista on all new computers.  All in all, is there anybody out there who says: “No, I don’t want my old stuff to work when I update”?  A lot of businesses stopped with Windows 2000, simply because they were good with the old reliable, and Windows XP started purposely pushing away.  So every few years, plan to have to purchase all new, unless something changes.  And, I guarantee you, George W. Bush isn’t going to do anything to stop it:  This computer stuff is like gas and electricity anymore, it should be regulated (apparently).

New diet pill:

Hey, do they have a pill (or any kind of food) that just makes you feel full?  That’d work best.  I know every once in a while, I’ll take a bite or two of food at a restaurant where I all of a sudden feel kind of full.  (With no stomach ache later.)  What is that stuff?  You say: Well, why don’t you find out the next time, and just let us know, Mr. Have All The Answers.

“I think I’m turning Japanese, I really think so” –The Vapors, 1980:

In the same way we’re winning the war in Iraq, I’m guessing when they’re able to chemically decimate metropolitan areas, where we won’t have the slightest idea how to stop it, after two, three, many four, we’ll be turning Japanese giving them our government.  (I hope they know to only gas those who voted for Bush in 2004.)  Now, I realize Islam is about the total opposite from what I teach, but simply because the men control the women, a competent open sex plan with valid Jesus support might find favor.  So it could be a blessing (for the world) in disguise when we determine to not give restitution (of course, I’m probably the only guy with the idea anyway).  And they know in four years we haven’t learned a thing about how to treat human life.  Time wise: I’m thinking the longer we stay in Iraq, especially with our continued and escalated campaign of violence, the more number the terrorists they will be able to incorporate, but the slower they will be able to implement any major U.S. attacks; if we leave, the quicker they will be able to make the stuff to get us, but with less numbers / support.  So, it’ll be about the same time either way.  Bummer.

You’re missing the issue:

Hannity’s still just calling everyone a hypocrite.  Is that the best his side can do?  Argue the merit of the issue Sean, not things that are really irrelevant to whether the issue is right or important.  Spend more time explaining why the issue is wrong or right.  Yes, we’d like to hear it; otherwise, you’re just making me, and likely others, just believe the Al Gore side.  A frank Sean would counter and tell me that his listeners are so dumb that they’ll just side with him just by his expression of opposition to an issue, without any real explanation; because “the game” is priority: solving real problems is secondary.  But, there are just a few of us out here who just want to know what is really right / best and what is really wrong.  So, be like a Marine and do it for the few.

Finding a fairer way: Slavery abolished:

If you lived from 1865 to 1965, you witnessed the greatest progress mankind will ever see.  Computers and the Internet is the only near accomplishment since; and we had all the important programmings back in 1965, we just needed to make it all faster and cheaper.

O’Reilly says he knows right from wrong:

“Dumb”: there’s no better word for it.

Man gets off of crime because no one could find an interpreter:

Screwy laws win again.  And God will continue to fail to find a church with the intelligence to impeach Bush.

Restitution for Palestine:

I heard something today about Bush having another plan to allow Israel to keep their religious cop-out (and not move to West Texas).  The plan included charity for Palestinians.  Not a bad idea.  I suggest to just keep paying them more until it starts to work.  And even more, after the next time it “just appears like” Israel kills Palestinians (like on the beach).  I don’t know about you Country and Western listeners, but I’ll be proud when paying my taxes to know that Israel gets to keep their cop-out.  And, of course, every cop-out means you won’t have to practice those difficult parts of that Goldenrule just that much more.  So it looks like we may have us a long term solution.

O’Reilly attacks Kansas:

Harshly reproving the governor concerning her support for the Tiller late-term abortion doctor.  Probably have to agree with you Bill (so please don’t set up any catapults).  What’s the world coming to when Kansas can’t even be perfect?  I recommend eventual open / free sex; then, ironically, can better remove cloud from birth control information.  Now Bill, try to justify your wondrous concern by showing some respect for those illegal Mexicans who have already been born.  And, try eating a steak, ham or chicken directly on the program when stressing to others about the sanctity of life and not letting it suffer.  It’s not spin, it’s just dumb.  (I definitely know the reason why there’s no microphone in front of my face.)

Understand:

There are many things mankind accomplishes that are wonderful.  I’m just pressing the issues in need of improvement.

Mr. Critical, in Kansas – Out there, finding that Fair Road:

-- Home (Index) --