Subject: I agree, right or wrong:
That’s what “patriotic” means. But, God sees and feels for the entire world, therefore expects us to love all countries.
7-8-08
The First Amendment: Freedom of Speech:
Cops and authorities don’t like it … but would be proud to die in the battlefield for it. “Dumb” explains it best.
Iran stated that if Israel or the U.S. bombs Iran, they will seal Strait of Hormuz, which would wreak havoc in oil markets:
How evil of them! They should allow us to bomb them, then realize it’s okay for us to have nuclear weapons and them not. They should realize that it’s us, not them, who should be in possession of the Holy Land salvation cop-out area. Practicing Goldenrule is just what they should do, not us. They, not us, need to realize that the spirit of the Goldenrule, not worldly possessions, is what leads a soul to Heaven. We’ll show them and God who’s boss.
Maybe it’s space aliens who are advising our government that we are above God. “Space aliens”: “dumb”: they couldn’t know more about God then us / me, because anything that moves in the universe is part of God’s creation result – God stated that that doesn’t necessarily make it “good.”
More likely “dumb” explains it all best.
Putting one’s camel through the eye of a needle (great examples):
Israel surrendering the cop-out Holy Land to Palestine, to be better in the eyes of God, would be like a camel passing through the eye of a needle.
I don’t know what Barack Obama plans to do, but the only “fair” thing to do about Iraq is to force all those who voted for Bush in 2004 to pay half their assets and incomes to the people of Iraq for restitution. Else, troubles will surely continue regardless of pullout or not. But, no American will even consider that, as it can be compared with putting a camel through the eye of a needle.
So, I hope you all now better understand how hard it really is to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. In other words, those who think they’re going the most, will really be the ones at the back of the line / suffering.
Understand:
“Fair” would not be just using the general tax dollars for restitution for Iraq. Why should people like me, who opposed a violent (and economic) attack, have to pay the cost? – Only those who voted for Bush after all the facts were out on the table, should be the ones paying the cost of peace / fairness. Especially after several days of U.S. news about our al-Saa restaurant bombing, which was informed proof of how things were really being handled over there. If you didn’t care about other restaurant customers, waitresses, busboys, etc., then God won’t care about you. Any good Father has to think “fairness” first, when dealing with all His children, whom He loves. And I have personally found that punishing a child hours later after the incident (with ascription) works much better than punishment based on immediate impulse emotion. It’s difficult to do it that way, as hours later moods are all different, but it works the first time.
Yes, I know: I could probably write ten books explaining exactly why you feel that if you don’t believe in Eventual Fairness, you automatically won’t have to suffer through it: that you will circumvent Afterlife “Fairness” issues, as you do here on Earth. It mainly has to do with you thinking you’re smarter than God.
“Fair”:
Making warmongers the ones who have to get two jobs to make ends meet. And the 2004 vote makes it clear who they are.
If you all don’t like me, wait ‘till you meet God (the One Jesus describes). Ha, ha, ha!
“Restitution”:
For Iraq: given without conditions. (Just write ‘em all a check.)
Note:
If actual other restaurant customers, waitresses, busboys, etc. where killed during the al-Saa restaurant bombing, or not, is irrelevant, as it was our “intent” to kill everyone in the restaurant in hopes of getting Saddam Hussein. And that was the rules of our game, as it also is today. Nothing has changed, if we can get Iran to quit being a threat against Israel, without interference from Russia or China, by killing whoever in Iran, the Bush administration would unconsciously do it. You have to understand the destructive power of church cop-outs: artificial salvation cop-outs are the world’s number-one enemy. Technically, it will destroy the entire world, unless my website becomes well known: No one else possesses the abstruse “method” and “logic” of peace. However, the atheists will probably be right, that the world will be destroyed because of religion, but only because of artificial salvation cop-outs, like Holy Land material possession over the Goldenrule; Protestant “faith alone” justifying the killing of whoever, wherever, whenever; etc.
Save the Males, book by Kathleen Parker:
Hey, is that Mr. Critical’s problem? The Goldenrule also for males? Hmm. That’s different. Well, if all are equally loved, then who will we protect? (Everyone.) The courts would surely be the last to comply.
Sex for peace:
When one is directed and finds it the custom to only sexually love one other adult (especially finding denunciation otherwise), they care (too) much about that “one,” and eliminate their cravings for others. When there is no sexual desire for the others, it means there’s no real emotional want for their well being, unless they have like a humorous or informative (interesting) personality [like mine], etc. A simple, elementary sexual desire / craving for all adults, male and female, actually creates “an” emotional / selfish desire for everyone’s well being, whether you’ve met them or not. And since we all emotionally think and judge in extremes, that smallest of desire for every human adult will begin a trend for the Goldenrule betterment of the entire world. People of the future will not even understand how we could have been so apathetic regarding the “value” of the variety of sexual wondrous human bodies. When one desires good for others’ physical bodies, then good for their inner persons will benefit. “Open sex” (with a fad / fancy for diversity in looks) is the “key” to the rest of all our other (long term) problems.
There’s an emotional sadness we feel when a child hurts / needs, but not so much when an adult hurts / needs. Open-sex will change that. And that’s where the greatest need is.

That’s right – if you guys are going to oppose me, you need to also cover-up your private parts.
“Cover up”: synonymous with Freedom or lies/deception?
Still angry about 1979?:
“Binary” thinking is very, very hard to shake; but, there are now droopy breasts on women who were born in 1979. If we really cared about the benefit of the Iraqi people, we should not just pull out of Iraq. We should first give control of Iraq over to Iran, who is probably more liked than us. Then completely pull out. Then “just” get along with Iran. Tell Israel to be “fair” to Arab interests, or tell them they’re on their own. Then the price of oil will probably go back down. Especially if we can start getting it… from Iran!
You see, the logic is, if we just pull out, Iran will violently take over Iraq. So, it’s better for the so called cause of our continued presence (the welfare of the people of Iran), we should simply set up Iran so no violence will ensue. But, most of you and me know that welfare of the people is B.S. under this administration, and that the only reason we want to maintain a strategic presence in Iraq is to be better positioned to invade Iran or any other country that disfavors Israel, or disfavors our continued invasions of Muslim countries. But, if we can get along militarily, then religion is the only thing where we differ, and that’s were I (only) can bring it together: The Goldenrule is universal – we just need to define examples of what it is and isn’t.
It’s probably the only real way improvements will come:
Jesse Helms dies at 86. From what I’ve read, the world is just that much better off now. He was even against equal rights in the 1960s. If you’re in any way like this man, you’d better pray hard to God that God is an unfair God.
Vote now:
Fox News should poll the American people if they think we should support Israel. Or, ask them if they think we should support Israel, particularly for their control of the Holy Land cop-out, in exchange for World War Three. Ah hah! Different number, eh? Be sure to explain how it will be a nuclear war where everyone in the world may die. We’re pissing off Russia right now, just tinkering with it. If tink leads to tonk, then the only way we’ll be able to rescind it all is by getting down on our knees (that’s if it’s not too far out of control by then). And I doubt Barack Obama would even do that. Saddam Hussein never “surrendered”; so why do you think any American President would? Better quit pushing toward something we mandatorily don’t want, in exchange for eliminating just “one” cop-out. – Your local church provides many other cop-outs for your justifications; so, you could lose just one to save the entire world. No, you say?.
Telling you all in advance. (I just love being right in advance.)
George will probably get that stiff, stern face, heavy breathing, blood pumping, remembering personal problems, to thine own self be true, one-sided, I’m the boss, pride, and say: “Let’s do it!” Or, he’s just dumb, and will do it because he thinks it’s for the best. Probably will be a combination of both.
I bet the only Americans who those Muslims really hate happen to also be the same enemies of the Goldenrule. Well, they’re the real American power, so I don’t see anything changing.
Don’t forget to say something for the poor helpless animals, Mr. Critical –
Thank God for recordable video:
There should be a law that requires a person to have to watch a video of the animal’s death before they eat it. Would that scenario more concur with Truth/Information/Facts or lies/deception/you? The truth burns, and where it burns, change is needed. Again, the first step is being aware of our evil; then later it will change. “Dumb”: it’s the first hurtle.
Mr. Critical, in Olathe, Kansas – Here in the centered geographic middle tier of N.E.W.S.: I just wouldn’t look as fair and balanced if I was off center:

TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/