Subject: Just direct people to the website:
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/
Or, to be pithy:
7-1-09
In this issue: War, sex, work and healthcare – what else would you rather I perfect?
Ways to get along with enemy countries:
Help them or ask them to help solve a crime. That slightest emotion of working together can solve the entire problem. Remember, each side is just dumb, selfish animals with dangerous escalating high communication skills. Invite their musicians to entertain in the opposing country, and vice versa. Have each side’s officials visit the other side’s museums / attractions. Top leaders should speed lots of time touring the world, everything from waterfalls in South America, to a Royal Caribbean cruise. Don’t let ‘em miss the Steamboat Arabia Museum. Maybe art galleries or war museums would enthuse them. Maybe get some competitive sports going between teams in the different countries. Anything other than economic sanctions. Make all good deeds unconditional. Have space aliens attack our planet (hypothetically). – Believe it or not, during the worst of WWII, both sides would team up together to fight the aliens (see Independence Day movie). As long as the more powerful (the U.S.) is being “fair,” it ought to work. It takes both a thinking process and a true superior maturity that can overrule anger emotions and selfishness with logic. So, find that one-in-a-million person to create a plan, and let’s get onboard with some peaceful solutions.
Realize, we might not all be here if it wasn’t for… Disneyland. While visiting the U.S. in 1959, Soviet leader Khrushchev wanted to go to Disneyland, but couldn’t because of security reasons. Even if someone just likes a certain place, but can’t visit it, it still creates a desire to not want to destroy it.
And remember, no leader who enjoys life is going to start a war with a country that has WMDs. But, historically, starting conventional wars where the leader likely won’t die, was more fun than anything else.
And, the worst case scenario is that the leader just slips out the back door before the enemy reaches Berlin. I mean, the Russians knew for a fact that the Hitler look-alike was killed and used in an attempt to fool the Russians into thinking that Hitler had died. So, when they finally determined it wasn’t Hitler, the experts attest that Hitler must have been burned beyond recognition in one of the flattened buildings. But, if he actually died, why would he have gone to all the trouble of setting up the look-alike? And, it’d be so, so easy to hide somewhere that’s not obvious. And, I don’t believe the workable Wanted Dead or Alive idea, which did capture Saddam Hussein, wasn’t thought up until “I” typed it in my computer shortly after 9/11, then George W. Bush announced it the next day, right before I mailed it out; even elaborating “my” Old West theme. I don’t know exactly how many yards away something that can detect my keystrokes and monitor has to be; but, I’ve seen documentaries that tell that such technologies exist. I’m sure it made “me” look like the moronic copycat when I mailed out the letters anyway. Well, God doesn’t care how the idea is presented, just that the superior idea does finally get disseminated. And, it did in that case. Of course, Bush didn’t even pay Saddam Hussein’s informer, which just flushes U.S. integrity right down the toilet. So, it probably won’t work again. But, it got “one” guy! “One” very important person who tried to assassinate someone’s father; who happened to not be lying about his lack of WMDs. Well, the media is just a bit happier I didn’t explain how dumb they really are, back in 2002. And, surely that’s their priority. They say, “Well, if you were at least a senator, or a top religious leader, then we would be allowed to at least consider what you say. Understand, it’s ‘who’ says it that we respect instead of ‘what it says.’ We’re not stupid: just listen to how clear and concise we talk. How else are we supposed to ‘know’ when ideas outside the box are better, until it comes from someone who has proved great financial success inside the box?”
“Marriage” go bye-bye:
Since the “fig” was the symbol of Hera / Juno, the goddess of marriage:
Matthew 24:32-34:
32“Now learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender and puts forth leaves, you know that summer is near. 33So you also, when you see all these things, know that it is near—at the doors! 34Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place.
“This generation.” Looks fairly close to me.
And, of course, other than using drugs, there will have to be a fad for diversity in looks:
I don’t think you can understand my open-sex thesis until you understand that it’s at an Apocalyptic level.
Technological improvements allow much more favor for a government basic needs allotment:
American Farmers Feed the World; exhibit poster (in west room); The National Agricultural Center and Hall of Fame: Museum of Farming, Bonner Springs, Kansas; (photo taken 2009), “Number of People Fed Annually By One Farmer”:
That shows that one farmer now feeds over 7½ times more people than one did in 1940. In other words, it was 7½ times more burdensome to pay welfare back in 1940 than it is today. And, that’s a 2002 chart. Other charts there indicate that 17% of the total U.S. “workforce” works in the food industry: including farmers, processing, distribution, and selling it (e.g., the supermarkets). And, that’s including the fact that the U.S. produces 18% of the world’s food, and the U.S. is only about 4½ percent of the world population. And, another chart said that the U.S. had 6.8 million farms in 1935 versus 2.13 million in 2003, meaning we’re only using 31% of the land to do it.
As a result, food costs a whole lot less:
So in 1930 (to the end of March), a person had to work about 90 days (about 25% of the year) just for food, again compared to only 40 days (about 9% of the year) in 2003(?).
This means we now all have much more time on our hands to force computer operating systems that aren’t compatible with older programs; and, it’s nice to know that today’s biggest trend is in building things designed to fail earlier than later, to keep people working. In fact, Republicans would support businesses to actually have a timer on their machines to cause their product to fail on the day the warranty expires, to help the rich get richer, and for creating more “jobs” for the poor. I mean, you’re going to have to allow this when only say 7.5% of the workforce is needed to do all the other manufacturing jobs, or unemployment will be astronomical, unless someone implements my government basic needs allotment idea. And, my doctor bills my insurance about double what they billed five years ago, for the same amount of time in seeing me. So, that ought to force people to work more hours for the same.
Plus, the above chart also shows that taxes “need” to just be eliminated. But, the world will have to wait until some“one” comes up with a solution.
Open sex means less population explosion:
You know, since I started my religious writings back in 1996, world population has grown by over a billion. I recommended back then that we distribute free birth control everywhere, but it apparently hasn’t happened. Also, an open-sex society would mean that everyone would be single (not married), and since single people desire fewer children (and, are more into working) populations wouldn’t grow so much (and, productivity would go up). You see, when you force marriage as the standard, it just causes more people to want to have a family: Being married just “fits” with having children. China’s the worst.
Hey, sounds like getting rid of marriage is the better answer:
Sexualia: From Prehistory to Cyberspace, Bishop / Osthelder, 2001, p. 467, “Forbidden Zones – China and Japan | From the Start of the Republic to the Present”:
Sounds like the more you force marriage (via “social scorn” otherwise), the more people will want to have children.
Unlike communism, Iran, and redneck Americans, an open-sex agenda would never need to suppress Freedom of Speech:
No one will want to go back to the marriage standard once the world is optimized with open sex (except the prostitute and gold digger types, but that would be like trying to sell an apple today for 7½ times today’s normal retail).
Health care reform: socialized medicine:
One reason some Canadians are coming to U.S. for health care is maybe because Canada is only about 11% of the population of the U.S.; therefore, we have a lot more to offer, especially if it’s something of a specialty.
It’s the church concerning my Christian sex and marriage findings. The media won’t tell about it because they’re simply too dumb to know its validity.
The Glenn Beck Show (on Fox News Channel):
Are you tired of being forced by our government to give your hard earned money to the poor and unlucky? If so, you’re not alone. Come follow me.
It’s a show for those who think they are the most Christian. And somehow, no one has the slightest clue where “the Antichrist” is. So, I guess it’s the best cover for the Antichrist, yet it’s so obvious to me.
If churches support me in the future, tithes will only allow more descriptions and examples of what the Goldenrule is, and more descriptions and examples of what it isn’t. That’s all. Who’d want to pay for that? Artificial salvation cop-outs are what people with money will definitely pay for. So, what’s going to rule?
Being between a rock and a hard place:
Yeah! I want Fox News to tell me what we’re going to have to do because of all this government spending? It’s like you have two choices: raise taxes on the wealthy, or admit that I’m smarter than y’all. So, I guess you’d rather have taxes raised on the wealthy, eh?
So ya’ think you can thing outside the box better than me, eh?:
WELL AWARE: Healthcare News You Can Use, BlueCross Blueshield of Kansas City, Summer 2009, p. 1 (cover), “LONG-LIFE secrets” (Large health insurance company recommends lifestyle habits to lessen heath problems, so they can save some bucks):
How come it doesn’t say anything about eating meat or fish?
Watch it (I double dog dare you):
http://www.petaliterature.com/VEG297.pdf (PETA), Vegetarian Starter Kit, “Eating Meat Harms the Planet | Global Warming”:
According to a recent United Nations report, the meat industry causes more global warming (through emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide) than all the cars, trucks, SUVs, planes, and ships in the world combined. Researchers at the University of Chicago determined that switching to a vegan diet is 50 percent more effective than switching from a regular car to a hybrid in reducing your impact on global warming.
A major cause of cancer is “diet”:
http://freedom21.org/alternative/chapter5b.html, Meeting Essential Human Needs, “pesticides”:
In the U.S., experts say the greatest cause of cancer is smoking and diet. When all causes of cancer are examined, those estimated to result from pesticide exposures (including occupational) are barely a blip in the data, as is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4 … Source: Doll, Richard and Richard Peto. "The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today." Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1981 66(6):1256
So if don’t have that tobacco problem, then “diet” is what you should be most concerned with, by far!
…
Often, the first thing people who cannot afford higher food prices forgo is the perceived luxury of eating fruits and vegetables. Since fruits and vegetables significantly reduce cancer risks, a dietary decrease of fruits and vegetables of just 10 percent in the U.S. would cause an increase in cancer deaths of about 26,000.19 … 19 Bjorn Lomborg. The Skeptical Environmentalist (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 247.
http://naijapinoy.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/what-you-eat-makes-you-part-ii/, What you eat makes you… Part II:
Chemotherapy and
radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult
to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites.
An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer cells by not feeding
it with the foods it needs to multiply.
…
2. CANCER FEEDS ON
MUCUS. Milk causes the body to produce
mucus, specially in the gastro-intestinal tract. By cutting off milk and
substituting with unsweetened soya milk cancer cells are being starved.
I like soy milk a whole lot more on my
cereal than regular milk. I think once you realize it’s unhealthy, it’s
not going to taste that great anymore.
3. CANCER CELLS THRIVE IN AN ACID ENVIRONMENT. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish and a little bit of chicken rather than beef or pork. Meat also contain livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites which are all harmful, especially to people with cancer.
4. A DIET MADE OF 80% FRESH VEGETABLES AND JUICE, WHOLE GRAINS, SEEDS, NUTS AND FRUITS HELP PUT THE BODY IN AN ALKALINE ENVIRONMENT.
http://ezinearticles.com/?Cancer-Alkaline-Diet-For-Survival&id=2145028, Cancer Alkaline Diet For Survival:
A cancer alkaline diet can provide a strong hand on your shoulder when it comes to keeping your body healthy and reducing the risk of the attack and onset of cancerous cells. When too much acid is absorbed, digested and metabolised into the body, it changes the natural pH balance of your blood. Your blood is slightly alkaline by nature and if, by environment or foods changes to a more acidic nature, then problems can arise and the internal body can become a prime breeding ground for disease.
A good, healthy, balanced cancer alkaline diet can help prevent not only mild illnesses ranging from flu to headaches, but also cancer. A cancer alkaline diet, heavy on vegetables, fruits, legumes and seeds etc, is worth considering for preventative measures.
The optimum diet is a vegetarian diet: it’s just better to forsake all the bad stuff. Again, the good nutrients in meat and fish are good for you. It’s just that by various degrees it’s all mixed in with the bad stuff, which kitchens can’t separate. Plus, the stuff isn’t that tasteful when you “realize” what it really is. “Realizing” things is the best medicine. It’ll be hard, as animal product is more expensive to procure (as it is today), therefore has been a major delicacy for the more wealthy for thousands of years. It’s going to take some time for intelligence to overrule the greedy appeal of getting the more expensive. It better earns her favors too.
I can even tell a way to better journalism:
By the way, we should use pie charts, etc. to better “show” how important issues are versus not. People that just use text can much easier spin a point to make it seem much smaller than it really is, and vice versa.
Honey:
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020715/vegan.html (TIME), Veganism and its Discontents:
Honey represents enslavement, the oppression of the worker bees.
However:
http://extension.usu.edu/aitc/teachers/pdf/honey_files.pdf, The Honey Files: A Bee’s Life: A Teaching Guide, Grade Levels 4-6, p. 76, “Videotape Worksheet”:
18. How much surplus honey is made in an average hive?
A) 1 teaspoon.
B) 1 pound.
C) 40 pounds.
D) 80 pounds.
The correct answer listed on page 95 is “d”.
http://caloriecount.about.com/topic-honey-ft141392-1, Vegetarian:
Bees aren't killed or tortured to produce honey, their hives are provided for them and insulated by the farmers in winter to protect them. The farmers only take the 'surplus' honey and always leave the bees with what they'll need themselves to survive.
Mr. Critical – Don’t you think the world needs at least “one” person who’s not bias?
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/