Subject: I pride myself by how many friends I have
Okay… now you’ve finally got something you want: I’m wrong about something.
6-25-09
You know…
Back in 2002, I thought up several insulting things against a violent invasion of Iraq; but, I remember thinking the media wouldn’t like hearing it; so I didn’t write it, because I was in a mode to get the media and President to like me. I know better now to not try to bootlick again. And, now there are hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of American soldiers who would wish I didn’t attempt the bootlick back then. As a result, I’m now more of an “American” than all the rest of you bootlickers who need a job, by being able to practice Freedom to its fullest. O’Reilly can’t even talk as open as I can.
I don’t care if you don’t like it: you’re just going to get it. I’m just going to get it said before I die – that’s all I care about. I don’t think God is going to punish me for correcting the selfish evil and the very dumb.
Again, I did a lot of preaching right before the invasion of Afghanistan, and Bush dropped food packages, with a low insurgency problem indicating an effort to not kill civilians; but, in Iraq there was apparently no sympathy at all for civilians, as in 2002-2003 I was trying to not degrade U.S. officials and the media as much.
North Korean cargo ship inspections:
You know, we’re pretty wicked for just asking places like Singapore to force an inspection of that North Korean vessel, as it stops there for fuel. You see, Singapore doesn’t want to anger nearby North Korea any more than anyone else in the area, especially since North Korea has nuclear weapons; nor does it want to upset us for not doing as we say. So, us just asking is pretty low, showing that we really don’t care about making peace in the world: all we care about is ourselves and our power games, placing defenseless countries in harms way. Of course, that’s the kind of advice you’re going to get when you have people like Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. I remember before the Iraq invasion, George W. Bush was going around all over the world trying to include as many countries as possible to join him in causing our enemies to become their enemies, subjecting them to terrorist attacks, etc. They don’t want to have to invite terrorism into their country. And, asking them to do so, was very evil of President Bush, and proves that we are the worst evil in the world, and that we are the ones who are the real danger in having nuclear weapons. Then we actually put down countries like France, Germany, etc. who had good reasons to want to stay neutral, as they sit on the same land mass as the terrorists. All we care about is making our problem everyone else’s problem, just so we can continue to be the big bully on the world stage, just to satisfy our selfish emotions, play the war game, save face, and just to get revenge for someone who attempted to assassinate Bush 41. These other countries may not want to tell us this, but I can.
Now, again, I’m not saying that everything about America is wrong, but the way we treat other countries is definitely in need of improvement. Of course, this is most apparent in how we support the Israeli endeavor, where selfish religious cop-outs definitely overrule what’s fair. In other words, if we want the other castle’s gold or women, we’re going to just take it. We’ve did in the Mexican wars, Indian war, etc. So, I really don’t see the difference between us and Adolf Hitler. I do see a commonality that we were both predominately cop-out Protestant Christians. That’s the real base reason for the worst of all evils in the world. And, “I” seem to be the ONLY one attacking the vast religious cop-out policy. So, try to convince me how the Book of Revelation isn’t talking about me as the promised savior.
http://pixhost.ws/pictures/882000, The Economist June 13th - June 19th 2009:
Not gonna happen. This just shows that someday people are going to have to admit that “I’m” the smartest one.
Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei:
You know, allowing elections in Iran and letting the people decide who’s in charge, was likely allowed because someone felt that warm, deep, good feeling in their asking of God. All I can say is that Iran’s supreme leader is really worse than dirt if he corrupted those election results. Of course, those kinds aren’t going to admit it, or make it right. They’re just going to have a BIG surprise when they “meet” God.
Say the Iranian protesters are successful in taking over the government:
They’re still not going to want to give up their nuclear ambitions. The main reason would be because of that huge evil bully and king troublemaker: the United States. For example, they’ll realize that it might be 10 or 20 years from now, but the U.S. will be out to get / kill one individual in a nearby country (just for personal revenge), and will “ask” or “tell” the Iranians to make the nearby country their enemy too. Then, Iranians might have to be defending themselves from that nearby country that might have nuclear weapons, touring terrorists, etc. So, I wouldn’t recommend Iran to give up their only possible defense from an extremely selfish, dumb, and bullying U.S., that will stir up trouble wherever they wish, whose leaders are so dumb that they actually think they smart, honest and fair – which means there’s only “one” person that exists who can properly refute their ignorant thoughts / positions, and that individual may be dead by then.
And/or, the Iranians will realize that once Israel takes over all of Palestine (slowly but surely), they may think it fair to take over the entire Middle East, to place cop-out temples in every former country, thinking they’re doing the Goldenrule by allowing those other souls an opportunity to be saved also.
Pakistan is a good example of a neutral country that’s now getting hit hard for answering “yes” to the United States. If the Taliban had nukes and Pakistan didn’t, then the Taliban would have Pakistan. And, our protection methods just kill a lot of innocent civilians, instead of a direct assassination of like a Taliban leader that’s harboring bin Laden. And, if you want to change barbaric religious views, then they need to talk to me only. I’m convinced of that. If you want to end terrorist attacks against the United States, then we need to be “fair” with other countries (like not supporting Israel, for an example), and make restitution to past victims. So, I don’t see any justification for our military endeavors.
I mean, we were attacked on 9/11 and therefore we don’t care in the least about victimizing other totally innocent countries like Pakistan, because we are the real worst military evil in the world.
You know, having the Internet blogs, Twitter, etc. in those countries that treat women unfairly, will eventually change it. So, send the Taliban, etc. new computers; then give it some time. Or, just have me debate directly with their leaders. I’ll have ‘em won in a week. Or, if it’s done in private, they’ll at least know right from wrong, but still not change anything just to save face. But, getting them to “know” the right thing is 90% of the battle.
Concerning Google toolbar forced updates:
What happened to the Google that became very successful just because it gave the user what they wanted? I mean, what went wrong that made Google decide to become a typical American business forcing worse tools on their users? Is there any user who wants forced updates, especially ones that don’t work as well as the older versions? Not only is Google just pissing everyone off, but they’re giving Barack Obama the justification he needs to force socialism. Why does Google want America to have to limit itself to socialism or to eventual communism??? Of course, maybe Google isn’t really aware of this, knowing that most users fear being blackballed, by stating something degrading. So, I guess that’s my job. The vast majority of Americans should thank God for people like me.
The same with the Weather Channel.com. They now have a forced update that loads probably ten times slower on every restart of my computer, and burdens their users with something called SmartShopper that pops up the left Window pane every time I make a Google search (in my regular search engine), regardless if it has anything to do with what I’m searching for. Is there any user who wants their left pane to be continually hounding them trying to sell them something? Maybe one in a hundred of my searches is looking to buy something, but now I’m reminded practically every time I Google search, of the real extent of what typical selfish American greed is all about. I mean the thing blocks out a good portion of my Internet viewing window, where I really have to close it every time! Yes, it would be better living in a country that doesn’t force that.
I ask: Is there any way I can just pay you typical American greed suckers something just to have the current temperature displayed in my system tray, instead of all the continual harassment of trying to sell me something I don’t want to buy??? And, same thing to just get back my old Google toolbar that worked a whole lot better than the one they force me to use now??? (I have emailed Google with my list of toolbar problems and suggestions, and they have ignored me; and I do look at the Weather Channel.com window with ads all over the place often.) My computer and Internet experience is just not as good as it was a few years ago. I mean overall, the few improvements definitely don’t outweigh the large amount of freedoms and better functionalities taken away.
Apparently this is the new trend for the future, isn’t it? Well, hopefully Barack Obama can save us, by forcing more government regulations or something. Possibly the government should make a perfect and competitive search engine (no, regulated to check against favoritism and suppressions), a direct weather bureau, a software operation system that can be better customized, and that (really) works with older programs, etc. Yeah, “perfect” only if “I” design it.
Also, I think all spyware that slows someone’s system should be outlawed; and much stiffer penalties against virus makers and their distributors. I thing 99.999% percent of the country would agree, which might be a reason to act. And, more education with other countries who now do little to stop it coming from there. Can’t ICANN or the government blacklist malicious URLs, or force giving people a warning of a known malicious domain? Google does do some of this, telling that certain search result websites can harm your computer… like their forced updates do. Maybe “dumb” is the real base cause of all these problems.
I’m just saying that these business practices are going to cause these companies more harm than good, which is surely not their intentions. Restaurants, for example, find out quickly when they try to make money by lessening the quality of food, they go out of business very quickly. The above would just be a slower process; or, just give their competition an edge. If they’re monopolies, then that gives the government a right to step in right now.
What else ought to be:
There’s a ton of conspiracy theories stating that every government agency and every major news media is part of some agreed secret evil, instead of standard typical favoritism (that I gripe about). Since these things have a following and do influence others to believe it, O’Reilly or someone should confront every major accusation, not by just saying it’s crazy, but by arguing and researching the points. You’ve got to realize that many people are very stupid and do believe it. That will help convince those more of reality, and it could find some things that the conspiracy theory people are right about, which is now covered like a needle in a haystack by all the crazy theories. I mean, this should overrule the importance of things like sexual affairs of politicians?
Why not try it get everything right before we all die? Doesn’t that sound like something we should all want to pursue?
The difference between conspiracy theories and typical favoritism (that I gripe about), is that conspiracy theories are saying that all government officials and media leaders are “smart” in their collusions; and, “typical favoritism” is based practically 100% because people are so “dumb.” Therefore, I don’t think that most of the conspiracy theories are realistically possible. I mean, sure, small levels of isolated conspiracies occur constantly in the government, and should be brought into light by the media, but this stuff where everyone would have to “know” to deviate from the natural pursuit of honesty, just isn’t “possible.” “Errors” involved in everyone’s mind more “fits” with the word “dumb” concerning overall acceptance of something that’s wrong. Uncovering small isolated conspiracies is guys like O’Reilly’s job. And, he can’t even form a correct judgment on the immigration issue (and teachers who have sex with their students), so “dumb” is what is also allowing the small isolated conspiracies, as well.
“Why are so many politicians having affairs?”:
Psychiatrist Dr. Keith Ablow.teaches oblivious Cavuto that the high sex drive has a lot to do with it. Boy, I tell you, true conservatives stereotype well with God forsaken low libidos, and therefore very high ignorance. And, since conservatives are the kinds who control the big money, their sexual ignorance can control the whole picture. Even Dr. Ablow stated that he’s learned this by doing years of marriage counseling. It really is the dumbest people in the world who are running things. They all just have high communication skills: a quick interface between the brain and the mouth, that’s all. And, I’m finding that when one is high in one aptitude or talent, they can definitely lack in another. I mean, just because one guy can sing really well, doesn’t mean he can play the drums as well. An awareness of this fact is something the future “needs” to know. O’Reilly is a great example. My verbal reasoning skills (in eighth grade) was test rated a good degree below average (don’t say you already could tell that so loud), but my abstract reasoning skills were test rated at the very top of the chart. So I can figure lots better than I can communicate it. So, what does the world really need versus what they really get? Not rarely, but never do I hear a politician or someone doing news commentary that doesn’t talk very well. “Abstract reasoning” is tested for jobs requiring high conceptual and planning skills for finding something that works better / best, in developing new products / innovations, etc. “Verbal communication” skills has to do with employees who need to efficiently work with written, verbal, etc.: information that already exists. And, of course, that’s more solid / stable information that impresses the public in the immediate the most. Possibly a government department of nothing but people rated with top “abstract reasoning” skills would give the same kind of answers / solutions that I can. – Something has to take over for the future of mankind after I die. “Abstract reasoning” skills has everything to do with being able to think outside the box. The box is what we’ve all been taught. Jesus, for example, had difficulties conforming to established Jewish teachings, and was instead highly pressured to think outside the box, even to the point where God was actually calling the shots. He would have additionally had to totally block out his worldly selfishness to be able to reach that level. And, that would have been better realized in the days of crucifixions. But today, one is able to live longer to tell more. Plus, I can even tell you how to reach that level without blocking out your selfishness. So, with the Jesus example, I think these (verbal vs. abstract) are contrasting aptitudes, where no one can really be highly skilled in both. Both kinds require good thinkers: one just thinks well inside the box, and the other things well outside the box. Which explains why all our news, government and religious leaders seem to miss many things which I find easy to figure. (1) They can’t reason outside the box near to the level I can, and (2) even when I explain why they’re wrong, saving face keeps their view stagnant. The catch-22 is that those with high communication skills happen to be the ones who voice their opinions the most, therefore creating a much bigger “need” to not admit error. If I can ever have the opportunity to talk to the general public, those (who lack the communication skills to express their views to a wide audience) would be able to agree with my logic, facts and findings much better, as they won’t have near as many thing to have to admit error to. In other words, it’s going to be a lot easier for me to gain acceptance from a saw mill worker than the Pope; because the Pope’s “box” is like made of solid welded iron, and saving face is probably thought of as just another priority cop-out in saving their soul.
North Korea now says they’re going to eventually annihilate the U.S.:
My advice on North Korea is the same as my February 1998 advice on Iraq: Don’t do economic sanctions and do nice things for the people of North Korea. Isn’t that the way Jesus would do it??? Economic sanctions only hurt the civilian population and just angers the leader even more. He won’t be missing any meals. Like the above Singapore example, it’s just another way we hurt innocent people in an attempt to aid in our selfish power games, while thinking we are so the people who should be in charge of everything, actually somehow thinking that we are doing it for the innocent people. (“Dumb” really explains it best.) We’ll cause another Hilter if we don’t change. Such proves that we are the worst kind of evil by targeting civilians; which we will later say we are bombing their civilians to somehow help / free their civilians. Like how we “freed” Iraqi civilians into a quagmire of violence, after years of us causing depressing economic sanctions. Oh sure, Ted Nugent will believe it, but I’m way to smart to “just” believe that we care for the benefit of innocent civilians in any country. And, if it ever gets better in Iraq (only because it’s now to our selfish benefit), then it’d be like it was before we first imposed the sanctions back in 1990. Plus, dealing / trading closely with North Korea, especially with more Internet access, causes a much better chance to change their government system (if it really needs changing).
Look at the world 200 years from now, where hundreds of separate countries will have WMDs. Are we going to be continuing to make severe enemies with each of those countries where we’ve ever had a disagreement with, e.g., the 1979 Iran dispute: even the ones where no one was killed? Someday, we’re going to have to find a better way, and yes the better way in bringing all those countries into a United Nations; and getting more to comply is by treating their “innocent” people right and fair, instead of the other way around.
I’m aware that both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tried being nice, but didn’t completely as it was all still conditional to them stopping their nuclear ambitions; which is, again, an “unfair” request since we have nuclear weapons. Therefore, “fairness” / God will never be on our side in this conflict.
Telling you all now in advance.
Plus, this North Korean leader doesn’t seem like the type who’s going to get down on his knees to an “unfair” adversary (us), which is what economic sanctions attempt. I think he’d rather go out in a “fair” assault to a truly “unfair” U.S. In other words, I think this leader cares more about trying to correct unfairness than he does about typical power and greed for only self-centered prestige. Plus, since they are more in the right, likely many of his people are in support. Try to remember when you were a kid and how nice the idea was of seeing the school bully getting punched out.
If we could make the Internet in every home in the world, then bombard everyone with the right kind of information (my stuff), then everyone would slowly conform to a world that gets along much better. The reason my stuff is the “right” thing to disseminate is because it “fits” best with reality, fairness and the New Testament. Mine’s the only thing where all of those meet. If you bombard them with anyone else’s solutions, it would likely just make things worse, especially if it doesn’t fit with reality: is bias, unfair, full of cop-outs, or flat-out dumb. – Which is definitely where U.S. philosophy currently sits in every stereotype I’m aware of. I think it’s mainly because the wrong philosophy still works for the wealthy. And, that’s who’s really still controlling things.
Plus, realize that “Jesus” informs in Matthew 5:21-26 that you will “assuredly” suffer equally to all legitimate unfairnesses against others, especially violence. I’m totally aware that churches counter this in their goal of telling the rich man what he wants to hear. “Realize” that “Jesus” has priority over the errors of Paul, the apostles, etc., which was just directed to overrule pagan criteria. So, if we end up bombing North Korea, you will think you’ll never suffer equally, but “Jesus” says you will. And, realize that I personally won’t miss any meals in either case. All I can say it to keep exercising and try to become a vegetarian, so you can put off the inevitable as long as possible.
Try to be as tough as me, who quit smoking cold turkey the first time I ever tried, in 1986, after probably 15 years of about two packs a day, of regular Marlboros, and liking it. I was very addicted because I had very high constant cravings, going nuts for several weeks; fighting it for years during every stressful / frustrating event in my life. With no patch, nothing to ease the cravings; with a wife and stepdaughter who still smoked. By the way, becoming a vegetarian was really hardly any problem at all.
Leaving things just the way they are at the present time, with full economic sanctions in place, just causes North Korea to be determined in building a nuclear arsenal with cruel intentions (another “Adolf Hitler”), and likely finding satisfaction in helping out the terrorists by supplying them nuclear weapons. Leaving things the way they are will lead to eventual air strikes against North Korea; to an eventual full take-over invasion; with an ultimate never-ending insurgency problem, to terrorism eventually in the U.S. mainland; where all the time we won’t understand why those people don’t understand how “fair” we are. And, that’s only if we somehow don’t anger China somewhere along the way. It’s all a fairly easy solution at this point, where someone will just have to “admit” that our WMD ambitions are one-sided; and whatever the Korean War was all about can be solved by, again, treating the North nice. For example, we treat Canada, Mexico, England, Finland, etc. nice, and they don’t want to attack us. Just treat North Korea the same way.
It’s hot around here:
Mr. Critical – It moves me when I hear about an organization contributing an air conditioner to a poor black family.
TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/