Subject: Human sacrifice is the best thing
…to poop on. So, we’d better impress God with some Goldenrule movement instead.
6-20-08
You can’t see the forest for the trees:
Concerning the WWIII / Israel / cop-out issue: I need to repeat what I mentioned in my last letter, not in an attempt to convince the public of something that’s not correct, but because it’s the best message from God: “Whichever side decides to let the other side have that Holy Land (museum) will be the ones closest to God, not the other way around!” Now, are we going to give them Muslims the first chance to prove that they are more Godly than us? Just rename a few counties in West Texas to New Israel, then tractor-trailer all our milk cows to the area, as well as our bees. Then we can all redirect our attention to using Paxcon coating for tornado protection. Have the New Israel (West Texas) pay for it from their high milk and honey profits. Or just make it cheaper.
I’d check with China and Russia first, before we help Israel finish Iran, to see if they think Israel’s Holy Land intrusion has been fair and balanced. As while Israel and Iran are fighting to the max for their lives, as if each side’s leaders were in harm’s way, China or Russia will eventually feel they need to get involved. And that would be called “picking a side.”
If them Muslims want to prove their superior righteousness, now would be the best time, as it would be a great opportunity to be able to show and tell (in correctness) how Ungodly Israel really is. Then Israel can gobble up all their cop-out lands, and look like idiots when God doesn’t produce the supposed messianic miracle. You see, today’s Jewish God is not the one God above all, because the Jewish God seems to only care about Jews, not everything / everyone / the entire world that the real God sees and feels – the God described by the New Testament:
Romans 3:29-30:
29Or is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not also the God of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also, 30since there is one God
That’s what’s called “simple logic.”
Just reckoning in reality:
I seriously doubt Israel would ever show the Muslims how the Jews are closer to God. So, I suggest that all those Islamic countries get together and decide that they want to prove to Israel that they are more Godly then them. Israel and the U.S. will smile with victory, but will suffer equally in their Afterlives. – Mainly because they don’t believe they will, as their faith is corrupted. Hmm: If it was the other way around, I don’t think the Muslims would suffer equally in their Afterlives, because they would just be getting back land that was recently taken from them.
Maybe we need a President that realizes that when Israel and Iran have it out, if we help Israel, the war won’t be over; if we don’t help Israel, and as long as Iran can take Israel, the problem will be solved. Do you think the American people could handle that? Only the ones who don’t have a load of (real) sins to eradicate. Unfortunately, we have a President that believes in Holy Land salvation cop-outs as well as Israel does – it’s his only option.
Popup:
(http://www.quizrocket.com/dumb-test?gatherer_id=100522&utm_source=ValueClick&utm_medium=Pop&utm_campaign=DumbTest)
Well, at least they’ve corrected the real question.
So, I’ve driven you back to cigarettes, you say:
6-3-08: Barack Obama sliding into third:
With Hillary still out there trying to catch the ball… and she’s on the same team.
Some polygamous adolescents don’t like marrying their 19 year-old cousins:
Well… if we didn’t care so much about horny adolescents not having sex, we could better enforce non-consensual relationships. Duh! Nice try though.
“Stability”:
If you can ever justify the hurting / killing of an innocent person, then there is absolutely no stable base definition of right and wrong. It’s all just a selfish game at that point. So quit deceiving yourselves that it’s something different.
”Binary”: Bible is infallible (like Rev. 22:18-19 says it isn’t), or
there’s no God / Judgment:
One extreme or the other, with no room in-between. I think maybe atheists used the six day creation as just their excuse to not believe in God because they don’t want to feel like a “pervert” by saying that it really has to do with (their believing) God condemns their sex outside of marriage, and will send them to Hell for it. Any flaw, corruption or mistake in the Bible seems to just be grounds for doing whatever a person wants to do. And the sex lie corruption is by far the biggest of all Bible (New Testament) flaws, and is very much antiquated by the pill. “Conservatism” and “saving face” (pride for the “individual”) is God’s biggest enemies.
Did Hitler think that invading Poland, Russia, France, etc. would make those people like him?
He did if he had the mind of George W. Bush, or any of today’s American soldiers. The “Right” still doesn’t understand why we’re having so many problems in Iraq. That shows how much in charge of the world we shouldn’t be. I think it’s that the better one has it, the dumber one is. Make a bum on the street President – at least he might be able to foresee a catastrophe (like I did). But, usually the King who wins is who the record books say was right. Except for this Iraq blunder. “Most” record books will tell it as a blunder; but, any book by Hannity or O’Reilly will tell it as a success. And O’Reilly will spin it where all the post-invasion problems we had (if it ever ends) will be part of the success. O’Reilly, how come I know more about how you think that you do? You see, people of the future will just want to know the facts, and the facts are that we were in the wrong. Hopefully they will also detail what “spin” can lead to. And we’re so dumb that while we were killing innocent civilians during our invasion, the President and our troops actual thought that the people of Iraq would thank us for doing so. We actual thought that the people of Iraq considered Saddam Hussein their enemy; but, found later that it was us they didn’t like, displayed by their vast insurgency. Let’s see, we bombed the heck out of their civilians three (3) different times, in a 12 year period of pure relentless terrorism; then Toby today still doesn’t know why they don’t like us. “Dumb”: it’s America.
What we’re doing in Iraq today, by killing all the insurgents, we’re killing all their military material, thereby leaving none left for the military that we expect the now Iraqi government to attain. I predict that if we just leave Iraq, there’s no way the government we leave in place can survive, because the Iraqi people would know that it’s just a government created and supported by the U.S. – the real enemy of the Iraqi people. It would fall quickly. Then Iran would quickly come in and take over. Then I’m sure there’s Iraqis that don’t like Iran, but probably not as much as they don’t like the United States. The best thing to do would be to set the clock back to 2003 and not invade. We should have just left Saddam Hussein alone (the future history books will say that). Just quit complaining if you’re U.S. military in Iraq, and get shot or blown up. Blame it on George W. Bush, stupids! I’m just trying to tell you who your real enemy is. I know you’re not going to believe me, simply because no one you look up to has said it.
What to do if attacked by a military:
History is filled with militaries that will just storm through your village and burn everything. You’ll never know when or why. They’ll be doing it for your gold, to send a message further up the road, because they feel they should get you before you get them (and just on conjecture because you’re simply there), etc. “Defense” has always been a popular option, which mostly just escalates things. The Christian thing to do would be to not oppose a military take over of your town or country. It’s more than likely you won’t see much of a change as long as you live moderately, which is also a (true) Christian virtue. The biggest evil would be if your new government demanded that you fight in their military, where you would kill whoever they tell you to kill. Slavery you can handle, beatings you can handle, rape of your mothers and sisters you can handle, but if you kill innocent people you will have lost your soul. Therefore, the biggest evil is the military draft. If Iran, hypothetically, took over the United States, the only real evil would be is if they brought back the military draft. Early Christians would actually give unconditional (quality) gifts to their guards who were taking them away to be burned at the stake. You can’t get much closer to Christ than that, can you? They must have had some inside information, like following the Jesus in the Bible, and had “full” faith in Jesus’ promise of an afterlife Paradise. Maybe if you’re good enough and smart enough, God would intervene and personally affirm it to you conclusively. If you had full faith in Heaven you wouldn’t fight martyrdom either. Any “Christian” today who would support a war, or even defend himself against violence, doesn’t have near the faith as the early Christians did. Hey, I’m not perfect either, I’m just telling you what’s perfect! Any “Christian” who maintains the sexual lies about Jesus, thinks they don’t even need to be honest.
From above: “The Christian thing to do would be to not oppose a military take over of your town or country.” – U.S. leaders would like the Iraqis to here me talk about that.
Catholics leaders today oppose war, but don’t demand their members to not fight in them. In fact, many seem to be warmongers like Hannity and O’Reilly (anyone who uses the word “patriot” a lot is a warmonger, pinheads!) If Catholics today were like the early pre-Constantine Church, or went by Jesus’ teachings in the Bible, they would demand their followers not fight in war. I think it was about the year 872 AD that secular rule finally had full control of the extant church, eh? I think it tells something when they leave-in Jesus’ words “love your enemy” but corrupt the definition of the word “fornication.” What really shows gullibility is the fact that the sexual part of the word “love” (between non-related adults) is still in the dictionaries but they “just say” it’s not part of “their” word. But, again, it was in the Septuagint, which is the Old Testament Bible both Jesus and the early Christians used (indicated by O.T. quotations paralleling the Septuagint instead of the Hebrew Bible). If people could somehow trust the Bible as much as they trust today’s church, it’d be a much, much, much better world. Maybe God would reveal Himself then.
Now I realize I’m mostly talking to idiots who know very little about true Christianity, so that’s why I suggest Forwarding my stuff to your religious leaders. Atheists? Yeah, just click Delete.
The Kingdom of Heaven (more allegory):
Daniel 2:44:
And in the days of these kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the kingdom shall not be left to other people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.
This future afterlife Kingdom will never be destroyed because God won’t let anyone in who has not fully atoned (suffered equally) for their sins (hurting of innocent people). (After Daniel patronizes the king) prior verses tell that earlier kingdom prejudices (favoritisms) will be broken up into fine pieces in Purgatory and blown away. Open sex is what will create (and eventually allow) this Kingdom for the then living, but resurrected people from the past will have to suffer in Purgatory to flush away their strong embedded prejudices (which today’s “marriage” and “family values” strongly teach). To have one’s past life live again they must deep down change their views about discrimination and placing self above others. Now, I realize that many people today “think” they’re void of bias (against race, the ugly, the poor, the dumb[er], foreigners, etc.) but they aren’t down deep. – People who don’t like or appreciate my constructive criticism is a good example.
Revelation 21:26-27:
26And they shall bring the glory and the honor of the nations into it. 27But there shall by no means enter it anything that defiles, or causes an abomination or a lie, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life.
So, when you suffer equally for your sins, you will fully know the filthy evil of it.
I figure in 1,000 years, they won’t just have open random sex as I propose today. They’ll probably have some kind of multi-partner procedure that optimizes its value.
Colorado idolatry:
My God is God; those who convey lies about the Bible: their God is a rock, which they use to hide from the God of Fair Afterlife Punishment. And the top religious leaders stand behind a mountain thinking it will protect them. It’s time to appreciate the Denver nightlights in a Holy caravan to the summit of Mount Evans. (You should stand atop the mountain, not behind it.) Or, observe O’Reilly mountain goats during the daylight:
Fair Afterlife Punishment:
Jeremiah 30:11:
“For I am with
you,” says the LORD, “to save you;
Though I make a full end of all nations
where I have scattered you,
Yet I will not make a complete end of you.
But I will
correct you in justice,
And will
not let you go altogether unpunished.”
The New Testament of the New American Bible: Saint Joseph Edition, 1986, “Doctrinal New Testament Index” p. 453, “Purgatory”:
P. 453, “Word of God”:
The Goldenrule is not of flesh or substance, but Spirit. All of Jesus’ names should be changed to the Goldenrule as He made it His Holy instruction many times. He would surely agree, as it better describes His adamant instruction which would surely increase results. It takes a whole lot less time to read the entire Bible if the entire Bible is in One Word.
…“Bible Dictionary” p. 443, “ISRAEL”:
Too bad one can’t struggle with God in West Texas. Could West Texas in any way be “up out of the affliction of Egypt”? Is West Texas closer or farther from Egypt? Well, this is a serious WWIII, possible End of the World, issue; in the eyes of our highest educated. Ask George W. Bush or John McCain. Okay, okay, I’ll look in the mirror and repeat “I’m the dumb one, I’m the dumb one, I’m the dumb one, …” and see if that solves the problem.
P. 441, “CHURCH”:
You mean it’s something that people don’t already know? Even people who think they’ve heard it all, and think they know it all?
P. 441, “DIVORCE”:
Well, Americans cherish their freedom. The Gn 2, 24 context is based on a speculatory stretch. “Wife” there is the same Hebrew word used twice as “woman” in Genesis 2:22-23. Two people (married or not married) becoming “one flesh” is what’s called… a baby. They also (always) leave out that solid fact that Jesus denounced marriage, party for this reason, which Paul reluctantly overruled only for the then current problem of the high prostitution controlled Corinthian church. Since marriage and prostitution are parallels, any prostitute would be willing to get married as long as the price was right, but would strongly evade free love, and would consider it working for nothing.
Harlot!:
So, are we going to let Freedom ring, or what?:
Bible commentaries of (corrupted) sexual words lecture “the ability to limit one’s freedom.” So, I can honestly say that open sex is definitely an American thing to do / pursue. But, that’s a very powerful little harlot you live with. So powerful she deserves three entire chapters in the Book of Revelation (17, 18, 19) devoted to the impossibility of her demise.
You know, the goal in life is to be happy:
But one person’s happiness can be another’s sorrow. So, the Goldenrule is only solution. But, we have to use the right tool to make it happen. The right tool to make you have the slightest interest in everyone is enough. But if it becomes as powerful as how our police, court judges, everyone sides with the skirts, then need I say more? Sexual desire is sort of a forgiveness tool, and Jesus’ instruction is for us to forgive others, as we are flat-out too dumb to know how to judge correctly (Jesus can’t say that, only I can). Jesus’ “assurance” is that all will be Judged fairly in the Afterlife, which today’s church overrules.
Of course both Republicans and Democrats howl for the Goldenrule / Fairness; but, the Republican mind is more Goldenrule on the small issues and less on the big issues, and the Democrats (or Liberals) are more the other way around. Therefore, effectively overall, the Republicans are about 1% Goldenrule and the Liberals are about 10% Goldenrule. Only a higher intelligence (logically) with open-sex (emotionally) can make it 50-100% Goldenrule. Since Republicans generally have higher I.Q.’s than Democrats, it will likely be Republicans who will eventually first support open-sex, as they now oppose it the most.
They don’t realize or think, they just do:
Bush must have studied a lot of history and watched a lot of war movies, which better established monkey see, monkey do for the Iraq invasion.
If we knew then what we know now about Saddam Hussein’s apparent non-plan of retaliation, even the Republicans wouldn’t have seen him as a threat. But, there are still a whole lot of them still not admitting they were wrong. It “fits” why they don’t. It’s “easy” to understand why. And with al-Qaeda in Iraq today, but not there under Saddam Hussein, shows that Saddam Hussein was one who was helping our war on terror, trying to avoid more problems with the United States. I don’t see how future truthful history books will be able to tell it any different. And I betcha those still making cop-out excuses for starting the war, are the one’s who mostly think they’re going straight to Heaven after they die. Don’t they? That “fits.” This logic just proves a need for Afterlife Purgatory, where otherwise, a Kingdom of Heaven would surely fail, if He “just” allowed cop-out souls in. If one does not “feel” the suffering of the results of their continued cop-outs, what’s doing to stop them in the Kingdom of Heaven? And there’s a BIG difference between feeling it versus just knowing about it. And these cop-out / spin artists don’t even know about it (the suffering caused). It’s like how they demand men to die in the battlefield for the American cause, yet ignore “innocent until proven guilty” for Saddam Hussein. Then, again, when the evidence (by the experts) is in, they still can’t admit they were wrong. I love finding solid proof how people are much dumber than they can imagine. Again, Jesus said the Kingdom of Heaven cannot be destroyed because those kinds will not be allowed in (Rev. 21:27), not because it’s infallible. Everything in God’s Universe is fallible, and God (and the image of God [Mankind]) is doing everything we know how, to help make it better: “Dumb”: it’s the main thing in the way.
I’m sure Saddam Hussein broke our frivolous “conditions” that just insulted him, but we were the ones who continually broke our own conditions / agreements / promises, especially the few months before our invasion. Apparently we had to, to justify the invasion.
Yes, most Americans today think the Iraq invasion was a mistake (covering all Iraqis who we killed), which just proves it was, but we still live in a country where most citizens would push a button that would kill all Muslims to get the small percent who would revenge America. “Cowardism”: it probably kills more innocent people that any other thing.
“Cold blooded killers” of Haditha (American soldiers) acquitted:
Why did they charge these guys in the first place? Apparently just for show at the time. – It was about the time “I” started making a lot of stink about that kind of stuff. I figure Bush and Rumsfeld was looking for a way to place the blame on others, to make it look like that was the only incident, and/or justifying it for military gain only. The charged marines probably said, “What’s the difference in killing Iraqi civilians for anger or for the fun of it, versus killing civilians for military gain, or just to get Saddam Hussein? That would be hard to argue.
Hey, now that we’ve acquitted these guys, there’s absolutely nothing stopping us from killing anyone we want: for military gain, to satisfy our anger, heck, for just entertainment. Plus, with a press that limits fair and balanced reporting, our military can do whatever it wants. Next it will be crucifixion, just to display who’s boss. Do what warriors is history have done for many millennia: threaten that we will rape, then slowly kill their innocent women and children, like to Iran, as a deterrent. Of course, after the take over is complete, you have to let our boys have their fun, or you’ll lose your integrity for the next country you plan to take. Shucks, now you’re thinking what good Christians you are for not going quite that far. O’Reilly will probably use that as a comparison on his next show telling about our killings of Iraqi civilians (rare). That Laura Ingram sure thought it was great that our marines were acquitted. It’s good to pinpoint real evil – the kind of evil that was the real cause of 9/11.
“The United States of America has never condoned, nor should it ever condone, indiscriminate, deliberate killing of civilians. When we do that, we become no better than the enemy we are trying to eradicate.” Well what do you call the Amiriyah civilian shelter and the al-Saa restaurant?
Let’s first figure out “why” we don’t want the Taliban around:
Why don’t you tell these Taliban guys that since the take over of Afghanistan was just a farce, as we didn’t continue the search for Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, proved by an American President who’s rescinded (my suggestion of) “dead or alive,” that the only reason we now don’t want any Taliban around is only because they force women to wear burkas and men to were beards; and that if they truly agree to not make women wear burkas and men to wear beards, then they can come back into society – for… you know, Freedom of Religion reasons. And if they disagree, at least they’ll know a logical / ethical reason “why” they’re dying when the bullet hits them. Nevertheless, finding Taliban in Pakistan sounds like more a job for police than military. Police have a tendency / methods of not taking out bystanders. Military seems to be much more cowardice where they are totally willing to kill civilians to get their man. Should I be more sick because the military does it, or because guys like Ted Nugent and Fred Barnes don’t realize it?
Again, if the Taliban at least knows “why” we’re after them, then they might quit fighting so much for the burkas and beards, because the pursuit of bin Laden doesn’t hold water anymore. I think George is scared that bin Laden will hurt him. “Cowardism”: it probably kills more innocent people that any other thing.
The fact that we are willing to kill innocent people in a restaurant to get Saddam Hussein just proves to an honest, intelligent person that we’re the same scum as those who dropped the World Trade Center. So it’s kind of an oxymoron to fight a war against terrorism when we’re absolutely no better! Then everything is just a game of selfishness. (That’s the way it really is and always has been, in case you don’t already know.) And when we’re too weak and/or too dumb to admit it, that just means we’re never going to stop it, and that just means we’re always going have someone wanting to kill us. I really amaze myself and am very proud how I’m apparently the only person who knows this. It’s like I know how to make a better mousetrap and you all don’t.
Is it assured yet?:
Appears like Obama has said: Step aside get-everything-you-want Clinton clan… You can have Chelsea beat me in 2016! We wouldn’t have believed it 12 months ago. Still don’t know who’s going to be Vice.
There are some places in this country where the Clinton name didn’t rule:
I think it was in summer 1993, and I was checking into a hotel in a small town in central Kansas. Noticing they had a “Presidential Suite” I asked, “Has Bill Clinton ever stayed here?” She replied, “Who’s Bill Clinton?”
I also recall once asking a three-year-old girl (daughter of someone I was dating) who was President, and she said “Abraham Lincoln.”
Why is it good to change Presidents every eight years?:
Politicians are publicly pressured into being “perfect” with no flip-flopping, changing of mind or fact, hypocrisy, etc. So when a politician initially states an error on an unclear subject, they can’t just correct it later (until the overwhelming population makes them), or they will look like they don’t already know it all, as people expect. They know guys like Hannity will tear them to pieces in the eyes of a very, very dumb public. After eight years, they’re having to retain so many mistakes that nothing in need of real status-quo improvements can be accomplish. Especially when the politician is highly educated – that just means he’s more conservative where past points-of-view are very much embedded into their mind as unchangeable; hence his initial response will be to stay with the old. That’s why it’s “better” after eight years, to let someone else start the cycle all over again. Technically, hiring an uneducated bum off the street to be President could produce many times more improvements for this world, as his mind would be more open (you’d just refine his other attributes during his stay). Sure, all Presidents say and actually “think” their mind is open, but it’s really not. Now, this doesn’t mean that all calls for change are good. So it’s a complex mix that God can see, where again, the Goldenrule and a strong education of such, is the only possible overall solution. It’s like every thing that changes in the government, new laws, etc. that stick: that (usually) never gets rescinded, are the Goldenrule improvements only; therefore, a strong Goldenrule teaching even / especially though college is essential to streamline world improvement. A person who has never thought or been taught something who is presented a submission from both sides, with advisors who has gathered all the pertinent facts, histories and speculations, can make a decision a lot better than someone who already knows it all (as the public expects / demands).
Binary:
You need to understand animals / humans can only initially think in extremes. They either like you or they don’t like you. Everything is a game of bias, selfish and ignorant judgment. When physically challenged, they either want to fight and hurt their opponent, or they’re scared and want to run / hide. That’s mainly why Jesus (the fulfillment of the Bible) had to instruct all to forgive all, as few humans can properly implement the correctness of eye-for-eye, tooth-for-tooth. Eye-for-eye, tooth-for-tooth is way too much in-between the natural emotional extremes; therefore, is incorrect to advice to humans. Jesus did fulfill and correct the many mistakes and corruptions of the Old Testament, and is the true Jewish Messiah. The “Second Coming of Christ” can only mean that Jesus was still right, it’s just that His real teachings have to be reinstated, to overrule all the years of cop-outs, self-centered cherry picking, and corruption. There could be no better example of an “Antichrist” than today’s Protestant church. They have totally reversed Jesus’ real message and definition of love, to mean whatever one wants it to mean, and everyone will read it to their self-centeredness. Even the gay community uses this major cop-out to justify believing in the Bible. Otherwise, they’d all be atheists. “Something” still seems to make them want to pursue God. If the media first believed the facts about the Bible really not condemning homosexuals (and even “recommends” it in Romans 1:20-32: an amazing spin), then maybe in 100 years, they’d write an article about it. But, the media is just as binary as everyone else, and can only trust 100% or not trust anything religious leaders say. It all has to do with the appearance of looking smart. Otherwise, major improvements could be accomplished. Accepting the status-quo makes a person look smarter, even though they may know some things aren’t right. And a person who “looks” smart, has more friends and makes more “money.” If “I” was publicly exposed, I would be greatly hated, and looked at as very stupid and evil. But, don’t some of you really thing there should be at least “one” person who can tell it like it really is? You just can’t follow or support me, that’s all.
Barak Obama: “The gifted orator”:
I really want to give this guy the benefit of the doubt, but I’ve usually found that the better they speak the dumber they are (on ethical issues). Him being black has to be a good thing for the Afro-Americans. However, they legally already have equal rights, and in many cases more rights than whites, but still less rights with courts and police (police are always the last to catch up with the times, like O’Reilly. Power resists “change,” for the same above reasons. O’Reilly has just mentioned the wrong thing too many times, and needs to save face). So hopefully at the end of his term, everyone will be and feel more equal. Blue collar crime is probably so high in the black community only because they still don’t “feel” equal. And I know they’re not in the eyes of many all-white conversations I’ve heard. Afro-Americans are also just human therefore binary, so I bet most think that when / if Barak becomes President, he will enslave all whites to manual labor, beat them just for revenge, and all white women will then have black babies. But, the “intelligent” way: the way to “real” improvement, “being better,” would, again, be to just pursue making us all equal. Barak still may not be able to accomplish that – where open sex would still be the only way. We’ll find out: the challenge is presented.
Compliments to my readers:
I think the ethics and intelligence of O’Reilly, Hannity and the rest of the media is superior to the average American (because they are under more pressure to be better). I don’t know how many of you analyze the ethics of the average Joe, but they are as fully dishonest and as fully selfish as dishonest and selfish can be. They might open the door for ladies, but that’s about it. And I’m talking rich or poor, old or young. The only reason they don’t lie to their boss is because they don’t want to get fired. That’s the only reason. Many businesses (big and small) will try to screw you any way they can, as long as it’s legal. One really has to speed a great deal of their time doing the legwork, reading the disclaimers, etc. to avoid it. And when you do, the business doesn’t like you. Even when they’re still making a good chunk of money on the order, just knowing that I’ve got them all figured out seems to disturb them – and that’s when I’m not trying to make them feel like the piece of dirt that they are. Now I haven’t traveled a lot, but I imagine it’s that same abroad. And the reason would fully be because of religious cop-outs (to overrule the Goldenrule) – it’s a “real” problem. The “intelligence” factor? Very little naturally can make it better: there has to be someone who can “teach” improvements, and I’m the only one who probably can (in the ethics department): I’ve never heard or read anything matching my thesis.
The only improvement in 2000 years might be that evil for entertainment purposes has lessened. But, nothing has improved when it comes to putting number-one first. Sure, lots of wives control their husbands, but for their self interest only.
Yes, I’m aware today’s “Christians” will do very minute “good” things to prove me wrong.
And yes, I’ve meet a few exceptions, but it has to be less than 1%.
I do remember watching a travel documentary once, stating common courtesy was noticeably worse in Italy. So, maybe if it’s “easy” we excel.
Passersby ignore old man hit by car:
I betcha if it was an attractive woman, more would have stopped to help. “Sexual desire”: you don’t know how powerful it really is, relating to concern for others. The cars who hit him apparently just didn’t see him and/or had no time to stop, and knew that a very stupid public would get him/her anyway, hence a need to “run,” simply because no one really knows how to judge correctly. President Bush purposely killing innocent people in Iraq is much, much worse that a true “accident”; but, few human animals are smart enough to overrule mindless emotions with rational fact. “Dumb”: it is the cause of our problems.
Hannity:
To be pithy, thanks to binary, he talks about all the good things about America to justify all the bad things about America.
I need to add another one to my list of Goldenrule definitions:
http://www.answers.com/secular%20humanism, secular humanism (atheists):
Secular humanism is a humanist philosophy that upholds reason, ethics, and justice, and specifically rejects the supernatural and the spiritual as warrants of moral reflection and decision-making.
http://www.godless.org.uk/golden.html, GodLess - The Golden Rule - Atheism, Agnosticism and Freethought:
Secular Humanism: “(5) Humanists acknowledge human interdependence, the need for mutual respect and the kinship of all humanity.”; “(11) Humanists affirm that individual and social problems can only be resolved by means of human reason, intelligent effort, critical thinking joined with compassion and a spirit of empathy for all living beings. “; 4. “Don’t do things you wouldn’t want to have done to you, British Humanist Society. “
That all sounds fine and dandy, except when the real value of the Goldenrule comes to test, where it is much to one’s advantage to hurt or allow the hurting of an innocent person, where one knows they will be void of secular justice / requital – without a fear of God / Fair Afterlife Punishment, there’s nothing to stop it. The only reason today’s Christians are the same (non-Goldenrule) way, is because of church taught and stressed cop-outs. Evil people who fear God are constantly searching for cop-outs normally: it just makes it really easy for them with their priest / pastor preaches them. It will be many millions of years before mankind could develop into the “means of human reason, intelligent effort, critical thinking joined with compassion and a spirit of empathy for all living being” at the rate we’re going. In other words, we’re not near smart enough to know the universal betterment advantage of helping others via an individual basis. If we “knew” what God knew (everything) we would concur. So the dumbness of the self-centered individual is nothing that nature, mutations, or accidents can override: only the emotion of fear.
(When science does conclusively find that DNA mutations is the cause of betterment, then they still won’t realize that it’s God / Underlying Intelligence that is slightly affecting the radiations, viruses, transposons, chemicals, etc. causing said mutations; in addition to the competing destructive mutations caused by natural selection, or the last of a species accidentally running off a cliff. Or an entire species being extinguished by a meteor hit or volcano, etc. We need to all realize this is a “functional” and “fallible” world, as it daily appears. That doesn’t mean there’s no God. For hundreds of thousands of years mankind has believed in religion, with full awareness of a functional and fallible world. It just means that those wishing more cop-outs define Biblical errors, corruptions and allegory as proof there’s no God. It’s like how there’s two ways one could fall off a cliff: by accident or by intent [e.g., suicide, or into a deep lake for swimming, etc.]. Same with mutations. There are “degrees” of intelligence all the way down the sub-atomic ladder. Else, without creations and restrictions / constraints, everything would either fall apart or go way out of control. How does science explain the consistency of the atom – by chance? That would be an incredible number of exact similarities to happen only by chance. God has limitations in creating “miracles” via the much more important restrictions / constraints of physics. As animals, we have the ability for a whole lot more chooses than does the plant. And with man retaining much more advancing information because of our high communication skills, we’re like an “image” of God’s mind, but broken up into lots of separate / independent pieces / individuals. Since God said He is not of form [Deuteronomy 5:7], then it’s His mind that can be the only “image” / “likeness”: a mind for betterment and diversity. God corrects / fulfills many errors and corruptions in the Bible via later prophecy. God can’t just “zap” all the errors in scrolls correct, as it would violate the laws of physics to much. Since Mankind is experimenting with the atom bomb [atomic deviations, but greater than God’s limit of secure modifications], maybe Mankind can produce such kinds of miracles someday without destroying all the surroundings. The “intelligent” restrictions / constraints involved in a nuclear power plant might be a good first step.)
The essence of jewelry is the thrill of showing that men have toiled and suffering in the mines just for you:
The bigger the wedding ring, the bigger the harlot, eh? Or, I should say, the bigger the dishonest prostitution (the MYSTERIOUS HARLOT –Rev. 17:5).
Typical good relationship, also definition of “lust”:
“I Want You! I want you so bad, it’s driving me mad, it’s driving me mad.” –The Beatles, 1969.
One should not get married if they don’t feel this – otherwise your marriage has lost stability before it even starts.
Jap attacks bunch of innocent people:
“He was tired of life.” I bet he would have been happier with life if it was an open sex world. Can’t these guys find some corrupt politicians, dishonest religious leaders, unfair employers, etc. instead of random innocent people? I’m surrounded by evil in the country where I’m located. (Sorry, I’d blow my entire message if I took the law into my own hands. Plus, God assures eventual justice. And, He’ll do it more accurately in true commensurate fairness [not in escalation]. Plus, I don’t have it that bad anyway: I’m just more aware, and an educator for righteousness.)
By the way, I mean “open sex” as “affording unobstructed entrance and exit; not shut or closed,” “free from obstructed passage,” “not sealed or tied,” “accessible to all; unrestricted as to participants,” “free from limitations, boundaries, or restrictions,” “available; obtainable,” “available for use,” “free from prejudice,” etc. as opposed to marriage / monogamy; not just “in visible view” which could be mistaken as just watching a married couple doin’ it.
The spirit of Harry Truman just told me that it’s okay to kill innocent Japanese civilians if there’s a military gain sought. President Bush says it’s okay to kill innocent civilians if there’s a military gain sought. Ted Nugent and Fred Barnes are totally unaware that we kill innocent civilians when there’s a military gain sought. Fox News which claims Fair and Balanced news doesn’t realize why Ted and Fred are unaware. Barnes would probably say: “In WWII we were fighting for Japan’s Freedom.” So, it’s good they chose freedom instead of complete atomic genocide.
What would have happened if we’d have instead told Japan after Pearl Harbor that we’re not going to threaten war against them ever again (and not have invaded them back)? First, that would be admitting we were wrong (an impossibility, same as it is today), but doing so would have proved that we were a whole lot tougher (more Christlike): only the toughest can endure what the Early Christians pacifist, gift-givers endured. (The Early Christians were persecuted / martyred by the family based Romans mainly because of 300 years of accusations of open sex. – I know you don’t believe me: I’ll show you all the proof later. You see, free love unfairly competes with marriage demands / controls, and prostitution profits – the secular standards of that era. “Fornication” comes from a Greek word meaning “sexual slavery” not “sex between unmarried consenting adults.” One has to be a “self-thinker” to be able to tell the difference. Or, you have to know how to read a book before someone tells you what it reads.)
Be ready: make a list: rehash each experience:
When you feel your Fair Afterlife Suffering, realizing it has to do with the innocent suffering you caused during your lifetime “may” ease the pain somewhat. I’ve found that considering my childhood evils when I’m in pain today, seems to ease the suffering a little. You have to realize that you likely deserve it. Now I realize this is a long shot for the vast majority of you, as those are the experiences that your mind has mostly been pressured into forgetting about. Matt. 10:26: “There is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.” If that statement distresses you, you’re in trouble. But not as much as people like Hannity and Laura Ingram, who don’t even realize their evil.
“But you have no proof that God exists”:
Via evolution, God now has an ability to grow and desire for a faster working perspective in this / His world, as an animal and human being. Each cow that is born has this same innate desire to want to live, touch, learn and achieve. It does not like it when its owner prods it around, and later ends its life untimely for food. We are all parts of this desire and achievement, but again, the lack of the Goldenrule is now the only (solvable) thing that stands it its way for much better things. If it did not take time and effort for God to evolve to this greater animal state, and could “just” do it all instantaneously as today’s church preaches, then there would be no need for us to be born, grow, etc. God is limited by time and the laws of physics, and many things (floods, tornados, volcanos, etc.) can hamper its progress. Just because God has limitations, doesn’t mean that God doesn’t exist, as today’s church leads everyone to think. “Binary” is the only reason for this belief that God can do anything or nothing. It’s today’s church that causes more people to become atheists than any other logic. If all these “atheists” were raised in a society where no preaching about God existed, they all would believe in, or better sense “something.” You could say we are each a piece of God, independently on our own, or you could say we are all a part of God breaking away from each other. Either way, the Goldenrule is the key to tie it all back together for a better overall goal. And open / bi sex is the key to achieve that goal: people will have to “want” to do the Goldenrule – down deep, emotionally, to make it work; and today’s church does a very, very good job of creating a high degree of apathy via the marriage / family standard. When marriage / monogamy is the standard, people are disallowed to move and appreciate others naturally (in Freedom). Sex is the most Holy and pure thing that people can do that’s “mutually” desirous. Building more love via “mutual” desire emanates to more and more things / love done for others. Telling everyone that God can make all their problems go away in a miracle instant, and that He damns anyone having sex outside of marriage, “logically” will make anyone with an I.Q. above 140, but below 200 believe at this God couldn’t exist.
Darkness versus Sunshine:
“You are my sunshine, my only sunshine. You make me happy when skies are gray. You’ll never know dear, how much I love you. Please don’t take my sunshine away.” –Jimmie Davis and Charles Mitchell, 1931.
Now, what if all people, races, genders, etc. were one another’s “sunshine,” would that more or less parallel Jesus’ “love one another”? It would actually work as long as you didn’t have someone of high influence continually hollering how evil it was. People of high influence have what’s called “high influence,” especially to those who are highly influenced (highly educated).
So, do you think I’ve driven you totally crazy yet?:
Mr. Critical – An expert in proving how dumb and evil everyone is.
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/