Subject: Sorry, I just can’t get a life
So I do do this. I mean, some think this is just do do. No, I mean I have to do what some of you don’t want me to do, or say, or cite, or bite (just don’t get too close).
May 26, 2007
That’s all she wrote for the married goat:
I think Fox should do a more in-depth story about the goat that died in Sudan by eating a plastic bag. It needs more attention than front page on the Fox News website, second story, posted in the afternoon on May 3, 2007, which was the only Internet news organization who posted it. Maybe Geraldo could do an entire show about it. Anyway, let us all know when her husband remarries.
Who’s your personal Super Hero?
1. Superman?
2. Spiderman?
3. The Goldenrule, man?
Well, it just depends what kind of Christian you really are.
Faster than an hour sermon! More powerful than a nuclear war! Able to leap around the entire planet with a single bound! “Look, up to the sky! It's a word! Use you brain! – It’s The Goldenrule, man!”
Yes, it’s The Goldenrule, man! – Strange visitor carved in granite, who came to Earth with no physical powers or abilities far hypocrisized by mortal men. The Goldenrule, man, who can change the course of flighty givers, bend steel for a helping hand; and who, disguised as some Mr. Critical nobody gent, riled-mannered reporter for a great cosmopolitan news caper, fights a never ending battle for truth, justice, and all that stuff.
Mitt Romney now to push elephant up out of pickle:
Directly after my last mailing was the first Republican Presidential Debate. I didn’t mean to get Giuliani to lose the Republican favor. – I kind of like the guy. It was just a joke! Sorry. Mitt Romney, by the way, you’re overacting. Try to be more like President Bush – you can tell he believes his own lies. Democrats: if you really want to stay tuned to your people, learn how to belch with a can of beer in your hand. By the way, the Book of Mormon was fabricated by Joseph Smith: E.g., Helaman 8:26: “Yea, even at this time ye are ripening, because of your murders and your fornication and wickedness, for everlasting destruction; yea, and except ye repent it will come unto you soon.” Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon was translated by God directly from the Golden Plates into English, thereby negating loss of any intermediary translation from Greek, Hebrew, Latin, etc. It is also not to overrule the Bible. The problem is, in 1830 the English “fornication” meant basically the same thing it means today (sex between single people). But, the original Old and New Testament’s fornication meant “prostitution” (sex for “money”) which was also an available word in 1830. So, Joseph Smith is finally caught by a lie from the Catholic Church. But, I would call that (the Joseph Smith fraud) one heck of a nice try. No one else would be able to figure that out in a thousand years. Technically, “fornication” is a form of the Latin word used in the Vulgate; which also meant just “prostitution” in 400 AD, specific to Roman brothels (places of “business,” not free love). So, it’s not necessarily that the word is wrong, it’s that the definition of the word has changed: hence, making the word invalid / incorrect (today). Plus, in the early 90s, it just wasn’t making any sense to me why God would condemn free sex. Then I researched the original Greek (porneia [use secular sources]). Today, I can definitely see why God was condemning the correlation of both marriage and prostitution, since marriage is just an organized form of prostitution. Things bug at me a lot until I see them “fit.” Today, I have a lot more faith that the Bible is from God. But, the Book of Mormon should just be put into a museum.
…except for one thing:
(Normally my commentary is in blue, citings in red, and quotations in black.)
http://www.utlm.org/onlineresources/gardenofeden.htm, Was The Garden of Eden in Missouri?:
Joseph Smith declared this new understanding of Genesis and the location of Eden during a trip through Missouri in 1831.
Joseph Smith thought the original Garden of Eden was in Jackson County, Missouri; here’s why:
The Lewis and Clark Expedition Across Missouri (interpretive sign, Glasgow, MO, Market St. at the river), “The Lewis and Clark Expedition Encounters the Prairies”:
Judging from their description the expedition members must have thought they entered an Edenic “garden” as they moved westward. More and more frequently Clark and the other journal keepers of the expedition wrote of the beauty and bounty of the prairies they were encountering.
Specific journal entry June 10, 1804:
http://www.ucdp.uc.edu/lewisandclark/biddle/volume1.pdf: HISTORY OF THE EXPEDITION UNDER THE COMMAND OF CAPTAINS LEWIS AND CLARK, TO THE SOURCES OF THE MISSOURI…, Allen, 1814. Vol. I. p. 13: Lewis and Clark Journal; near Glasgow, Missouri; June 10, 1804:
“A head wind forced us to remain there all the next day, during which we dried the meat we had killed, and examined the surrounding country, which consists of good land, well watered, and supplied with timber: the prairies also differ from those castward [east] of the Mississippi, inasmuch as the latter are generally without any covering except grass, whilst the former abound with hazel, grapes and other fruits, among which is the Osage plum of a superior size and quality.” --This “differ” and “without any covering except [only] grass” indicates that within the then American boundary (basically the Mississippi River), “free” food had been eliminated, just so to motivate people to work. Even in 1831, it makes sense someone from New York would notice a difference.
Lewis and Clark Journals are filled with this kind of “free food” stuff. I like this one the best:
http://www.kshs.org/lewisclark/journals.htm (Kansas State Historical Society): Lewis and Clark: Kansas Journal Entries; near Atchison, Kansas; July 4, 1804:
“The Plains of this country are covered with a Leek [edible, related to onion and garlic] Green Grass, well calculated for the sweetest and most norushing hay --interspersed with Cops [copses] of trees, Spreding ther lofty branchs over Pools Springs or Brooks of fine water. Groops of Shrubs covered with the most delicious froot is to be seen in every direction, and nature appears to have exerted herself to butify the Senery by the variety of flours (raiseing) Delicately and highly flavered raised above the Grass, which Strikes & profumes the Sensation, and amuses the mind throws it into Conjecterng the cause of So magnificent a Senery [several words illegible, crossed out] in a Country thus Situated far removed from the Sivilised world to be enjoyed by nothing but the Buffalo Elk Deer & Bear in which it abounds & Savage Indians” –Here, Clark denotes a natural state of growth, and, again, that it doesn’t exist in the civilized world (America).
http://lewisandclarkjournals.unl.edu/1804-07-04.html (University of Nebraska, Lincoln), Moulton, On July 4, 1804 another member of the party (Sergeant Ordway) wrote:
“one of the most beautiful places I ever Saw in my life, open and beautifully Diversified with hills & vallies all presenting themselves to the River” This is at present day Independence Creek five miles north of Atchison, Kansas (north on 2nd, east on 314th Rd to parking lot, walk across bridge to top of levee, look west); believe me, the spot doesn’t look like that today: it looks like anywhere else in the river valley. But I can see how it might look that way if it was covered with a colorful variety of food. I think it would give a person a sense of security: a good, safe feeling: a feeling that God is here. All that would be missing is a variety of naked women there for all (including the women) to sexually enjoy (with a mindset to allow it). – Then, let’s see if anyone could better that kind of paradise?
… (Sergeant Floyd) wrote:
“we camped at one of the Butifules Praries I ever Saw open and butifulley Divided with Hills and vallies all presenting themselves”
http://editorialmatters.lee.net/articles/2004/06/29/stories/top_stories/9ynews198.txt, Editorial Matters: Stories: Journey of destiny begins again today, by Sherry Devlin of the Missoulian, re: July 4, 1804:
They wrote of a landscape previously undescribed by Europeans: "The Plains of this countrey are covered with a Leek Green Grass ….”
http://www.emporia.edu/nasa/lewis_cl/atchison/atchison.htm (Emporia State University), Atchison and Vicinity, Kansas & Missouri: Lewis and Clark, re: July 4th, 1804:
At this point in their journey, Lewis and Clark were entering a veritable Garden of Eden (Ambrose 1996). Clark wrote in his journal entry for the day: So magnificent a Senerey in a Contry thus Situated far removed from the Sivilised world to be enjoyed by nothing but the Buffalo Elk Deer & Bear in which it abounds & Savage Indians.
Atlas of Lewis & Clark in Missouri, Harlan: Denny, 2003, University of Missouri, Introduction: “The Missouri Experience: An Overview,” p. 5:
Lewis & Clark: The Journey of the Corps of Discovery (PBS DVD), Ken Burns, 1997, Side A, Special Features, “Interview with Stephen Ambrose [Program Adviser / Author]” [on The Charlie Rose Show, broadcast March, 1996]:
“These guys [Lewis and Clark] went into a Garden of Eden! In the Garden of Eden, you just reach out and grab your food … Lewis and Clark and the men of the Corps of Discovery saw things that no human being will ever see again”
This sounds like a place where a woman could raise ten children by herself, without the help of a man – where each child would be an “asset”: an additional helper, instead of the major burden they are today.
Therefore, anyone who thinks our government “gives” welfare is incorrect: they should think our government is “giving back” what our government has stolen from God.
I like doing my homework, and I’ve accumulated a ton of this kind of “free food” stuff, like from other early explorers, including early eastern colonial.
Now, I’m not saying let’s stop the trucks and close the grocery stores (and just replant paradise). I’m saying that it would reduce crime, etc. if we inform the poor that they deserve the welfare, and probably a lot more. What’s wrong with starting in the middle (instead of the bottom) and working our way up? And people work a lot better, more efficiently, with more pride and enthusiasm when they know they don’t have to (to get “more”). Ask all the rich people who work. And, a lot of guys go to jail just because it’s free shelter and three square meals a day. But, the cost for the rest of us would be a lot less if we just give them free shelter and three squares a day.
Sudanians: learn to protect your wives:
Plus, I keet being reminded how more and more inefficient the world is becoming today.
Ayman al-Zawahri video posted on Internet 5-5-07:
“This bill will deprive us of the opportunity to destroy the American forces which we have caught in a historic trap” concerning Americans pulling out of Iraq. Hey, that’s my line (in my 5-3-07 email), well the premise. See my popinjay rambling under the title “It makes sense.” So, possibly someone is forwarding my stuff to Al-Qaeda’s second in command. Well… hi. How are you? Are you having nice weather today? You are not justified in hurting “innocent” people. The Goldenrule (alone) is Islam’s final leader too. Try to be “better” than American leaders. I know they won’t change, will you? If you cannot stop / kill the direct enemy individual(s), you are not justified in killing others. Try to be religious and have “faith” that God will judge fairly in their afterlives. It’s “impossible” for violence like yours (and the U.S.’s) to make an ethically perfect world. A lot of people don’t have any political opinion at all. How would you like it if you were the lady just wanting to shop in the market? Would you feel any different if George W. Bush (or an American soldier) just saved your life? How would you handle things then? Is that how God / Jesus would want you to look at it? God won’t be impressed if you can’t be the better person. A peaceful U.S. presence might actually make the Islamic world better, but probably not without my guidance. Buy the way, what’s your gripe? I’m not hearing it on Fox News. Spread this intelligent information around. Are you aware that a great number of Americans are against the Iraq war and Middle East involvement, and many protest frequently? And, if the media educated them better about the wrongs we do, then there’d be a very large percentage of Americans against the war.
Truth or Consequences?:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA%20Hits/Iraq_CIAHits.html:
The whole dispute started because Kuwait was slant-drilling. Using equipment bought from National Security Council chief Brent Scowcroft's old company, Kuwait was pumping out some $14-billion worth of oil from underneath Iraqi territory. Even the territory they were drilling from had originally been Iraq's. Slant-drilling is enough to get you shot in Texas, and it's certainly enough to start a war in the Mideast.
Slant drilling:
“Clap hands for the media man. But does he think when he has to read the news? Media man - that's right he's a media man. See him push, see him crawl, watch him rise, watch him fall.” –Flash And The Pan, 1980.
I enjoy watching all the ignorant pride on CNN, etc. In a democracy, someone like Geraldo should do an unbiased special, and then let the people decide. Under a dictatorship, it’s already been decided for the people. Good thing our boys die in the battlefield so we can maintain our democracy (said) or dictatorship (real). Use Geraldo, because he is very good at explaining things. I don’t think we can do the “unbiased” part, so why bother at all? “Unbiased” means like if there was a fist fight between two kids, and the news only reports the hits by one of the kids, ignoring all the hits of the other kid. And, the people / the democracy has to make decisions based on that. Fox News uses these tactics daily, to make it a better world for a well-informed future generation so there will never be another Iraqi like problem again. There’s a supposed impressive intelligence to this art. Fox’s qualification for employment is likely based on how well you can spin the issues. Why is it that those who go to the extra trouble to inform us they are “fair and balanced,” are really the ones who are most unfair and unbalanced? Same with “unafraid”: The only reason Fox News wants us to unfairly kill and maim lots of Iranians and North Koreans is because they are the MOST afraid. I will look forward to Fox News letting me know how I’m wrong. I believe the art will demonstrate that they will be fair and balanced on minor issues (sometimes with sacrifice), just to make us think they are being fair and balanced on the major issues, right?
Determining a surrender date:
No, I don’t think Adolf Hitler had one. Nor, did he have a restitution date. Commensurately, nor does President Bush.
Judge sues dry cleaners for $65 million for a lost pair of pants:
Well, that should help show you how human anger can far exceed fair punishment. Therefore, realize Jesus suggests we “forgive” others simply because we are too stupid to know how to judge correctly and fairly. Plus, we really don’t always know who’s lying, nor do we always catch the wrongdoer, and I think partiality would be impossible for the most intelligent animal (humans) to control. Leave the judgment to Jesus and the afterlife. There’s simply no way I could hear every court case in the world. Of course, this isn’t nothing compared to Warren Jeffs’ life sentence for Freedom of Religion. I disagree with Mormon polygamy, etc., but, worst case scenario, the girl’s suffering of not wanting to get marriage could no way equate to life if prison. Adolescents are required to do a lot of things they don’t want to do – like going to school. Sex is something people “should” enjoy, unless someone has told her otherwise. That someone(s) is the one(s) who will suffer equally for Jeffs’ sufferings (and the girl’s), in their afterlife(s). Also the system people who are holding Jeffs.
I like it when T.V. judges constantly interrupt litigants, then harshly scold them when they cut-in regarding a point as the judge is speaking. It’s like the judge makes it an acceptable rule to just cut-in whenever you want, but then slams them when they do. The entertaining part is when the litigant will usually give that What’d I do wrong? innocent look. Well partner, it all has to do with the rewards of being an abusing authority. Unless you’re the litigant, the general public puts up with it because it is entertaining to watch or hear about an abusive judge. But then the general public doesn’t like it when it causes someone to come out of jail / prison twice as evil as when they went in. But, then the general public is far too stupid to realize that, so I don’t ever see it ending. I’ll just set back and enjoy the entertainment, and then complain big time (to deaf / dumb ears) when I become a victim of crime again.
And, games against those who practice Freedom of Speech is the only thing these talking animals know. I admit, stories about a judge just enforcing fair laws is kind of boring, where stories about bias is rather entertaining. So, I don’t see things changing too soon.
Too tight Dwight:
“Hey baby, what do you know about how it feels? Honey what do you know about if that’s real? Baby, what do you know about the whole deal: What do you know about love?” –Dwight Yoakam, 2000. Good question. I feel we’ll seal the “whole deal” when we reveal the ordeal to heal all the squeal with real ideal “mutual” appeal, to peel harmful bias and marriage zeal, without the eucharistic meal, or having to kneel; instead of having to surreal our young to conceal. Surely the genteel future wheel will never appeal to repeal.
I’m a poet and didn’t really know I was.
Whated due it?:
“What the world needs now is love, sweet love: It's the only thing that there’s just too little of.” –Jackie DeShannon, 1965.
“Light of the world, shine on me: Love is the answer.” –England Dan & John Ford Coley, 1979.
“Love’s the only house big enough for all the pain in the world.” –Martina McBride, 1999.
You have to make it happen:
Positive thought can help the individual; but, if you want to get your aerial tram to restart, you have to push the Emergency Start button. I guarantee you, telling yourself to love is not going to win the population, until it’s physically accomplished, achieving some kind of satisfaction: open / free sex. “That’s the power.”
The Church’s definition of love begets less freedom, less fellowship, and more problems (bummer):
“If I see you tomorrow on some street in town, pardon me if I don't say hello (hello): I belong to another, it wouldn't look so good to know someone I'm not supposed to know. Just walk on by, wait on the corner: I love you, but we're strangers when we meet.” –Leroy Van Dyke, 1961.
“As sure as the stars shine above, you’re nobody til somebody loves you. So find yourself somebody to love. –Dean Martin, 1964.
“Like a cloud full of rain shouldn't hang in the sky, ice shouldn't burn or a bumble bee fly. If you feel so happy, then why do you cry. Oh, nothin’ bout love makes sense.” –LeAnn Rimes, 2004.
“Love is thin ice: it's so easy to fall right in. Love is thin ice so you better know how to swim. If you're not ready for falling then you better be careful when love starts calling: take my advice love is thin ice.” –Barbara Mandrell, 1976.
“I was tired of my lady, we’d been together too long. Like a worn-out recording, of a favorite song.” –Rupert Holmes, 1979.
“It’s like a knife through the heart when it all comes apart. It’s like someone takes a pin to your balloon. It’s a hole, it’s a cave, it’s kinda like a grave, when he tells you that he’s found somebody new. … Why they call it fallin’ – now I know.” –Lee Ann Womack, 2001.
“Bring back that lovin’ feeling, ‘cause it’s gone…gone…gone, and I can’t go on, noooo….” –The Righteous Brothers, 1964.
“I think the devil drives a Coupe de Ville. I watched ‘em drive away over the hill – not against her will, an’ I’ve got time to kill, down in Brokenheartsville.” –Joe Nichols, 2002.
“Cause she’s the reason I feel this way: I hate everything.” –George Strait, 2004.
“Why do the birds go on singing? Why do the stars glow above? Don't they know it's the end of the world: it ended when I lost your love.” –Skeeter Davis, 1962.
“I don’t want to live without you.” –Foreigner, 1988.
“I’ve been trying to get over you; but, it’ll take dyin’ to get it done.” –Vince Gill, 1994.
“He put that bottle to his head and pulled the trigger, and finally drank away her memory.” –Brad Paisley, 2004.
“Love hurts. Love scares. Love wounds and mares any heart.” –Nazareth, 1975.
“Only love can break a heart; only love can mend it again.” –Gene Pitney, 1962.
“Many a tear has to fall; but, it’s all in the game.” –Tommy Edwards, 1958.
“And while they were dancin’, my friend stole my sweetheart from me.” – Patti Page, 1950.
“Dashing and daring, a drink he was sharing, with wicked Felina: the girl that I loved. So in anger I challenged his right for the love of this maiden. Down went his hand for the gun that he wore. My challenge was answered in less than a heart-beat; the handsome young stranger lay dead on the floor.” –Marty Robbins, 1959.
“Ain’t no sunshine when she’s gone. It’s not warm when she’s away. … And this house just ain’t no home, anytime she goes away.” –Bill Withers, 1971.
“You love her, but she loves him. And he loves somebody else. You just can't win. And so it goes till the day you die: this thing they call love – it's gonna make you cry. I've had the blues, the reds and the pinks; one thing for sure: Love Stinks – yeah yeah” –J. Geils Band, 1980.
“You are everything, and everything is you.” –The Stylistics, 1971.
“Sometimes it’s hard to be a woman – giving all your love to just one man. You’ll have bad times and he’ll have good times.” –Tammy Wynette, 1968.
“There’s no way I could make it without you. There’s no way that I’d even try. If I had to survive without you in my life, I know I wouldn’t last a day, oh baby, there’s no way.” –Alabama, 1985.
“Asking God to get you off my mind.” –Brooks & Dunn, 2004.
“There’s my kids and that’s my wife. Who’s that man runnin’ my life?” –Toby Keith, 1994.
“Hey, hey, we're the Monkees. And people say we monkey around. But we're too busy singing to put anybody down.” –1966. How’d that get in there? (Maybe O’Reilly could use said phrase for his next command to us for emailing him – he just enjoys abridging our Freedom of Speech.)
“I’m beggin’ you friend, don’t take her she’s all I’ve got.” –Tracy Byrd, 1997.
“Where, where, are you tonight? Why did you leave me here all alone? I searched the world over, and thought I found true love. You met another and PFFT! you were gone.” –Buck Owens, 1972. (--Hopefully I’m making it easy to understand for all those who already know it all.)
That’s probably not enough, but I’m running out of paper.
I think the Pope’s too educated to know the real world:
“Every time you take a sip, in this smoky atmosphere. You press that bottle to your lips, and I wish I was your beer. In the small there of your back your jeans are playing peekaboo. I'd like to see the other half of your butterfly tattoo. … I'd like to see you out in the moonlight. I'd like to kiss you way back in the sticks. I'd like to walk you through a field of wildflowers. And I'd like to check you for ticks.” –Brad Paisley, 2007.
I’ll get my 15 minutes of fame:
If I see a tornado, I’ll be the one they film running behind it strongly cussing it out, throwing my fists toward it with feet kicking, as I follow it along. I’ll have my Roman shield up blocking the stuff it throws at me. Then, maybe I won’t and just say I did.
True Christians / Vegetarians, remember:
Keep your house above the downward flow of the veil of marriage, ‘til you ride that dusty jeep trail to ultimate Freedom, or to lunch.
I bought a helmet at my local Army surplus store:
Geico® thinks they’re the superior critic, but I understand Mr. Erectus was so angry at me about what I said about him, that he threw a spear straight up so hard that it didn’t apex for 500,000 years. (Possibly too technical of a joke. Maybe only people who have 15 minutes can understand it. The Catholic Church probably thinks I’m still taking about Viagra)
Fox News says Iran gave death sentence to many “children”:
According to Fox, under 18 means “children.” If some adolescent killed one of my loved ones, I’d want them to be executed too. ‘Course, I must forgive, because I’m not smart enough to judge correctly (my loved one might have deserved it), so I would suggest just life in prison. But, this is Fox’s latest intelligent good reason to invade Iran, and kill many of their children (under 13). Let’s invade, drop lots of bombs, killing many Iranian children, then call it Operation Saving Iranian Children. Most Americans will believe it, until election time.
Romans 13:1-2:
“1Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. 2Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.” Well, that’s Paul talking, not Jesus. That’s not high intelligence talking either, or it’s saying Adolf Hitler’s authority was from God. Also Iran, North Korea, etc. It is advisable to obey secular laws (unless it hurts an innocent person), because of obvious secular penalties, and because there can be a lot of good advice there. Paul is not to overrule Jesus. And secular law is certainly not to overrule Jesus. Paul is to be taken with a grain of salt: Paul many times just echoes the true Jesus, and sometimes elaborates away from It in a way that shows It better (prime reason it made canon). People should look at Paul as just an early Christian, which particulars may or may not be representative. If God gives voice to too many, then folks will lose site of the One voice: Jesus. It could be, however, that God allowed Paul’s writings into canon, simple to easily see and show who is of God and who is not, by which contradiction they choose to follow / preach; if for no one else, I can show / utilize it (sometimes I quote Paul, usually to show how Christians today don’t follow even him, if it doesn’t suit their personal wants). Paul’s letters were even written before the Gospels were written (according to traditional sources); therefore, Paul may have easily missed lots of the teachings of Jesus, which we have access to today. Even the presumptions from the direct Disciples of Christ are not to overrule or necessarily add to Christ’s words, and should all be considered with reservation. Only red-letter words of Jesus are to be fully accepted / analyzed, as they come direct from God, mainly when it was parabolic. Gospel of Thomas, 39: Jesus said, “The Pharisees and the scholars have taken the keys of knowledge and have hidden them.” – So, we also can’t fully trust the Old Testament either, if you’re a Christian. I bet a lot (I use “a lot” too much. People are going to think I’m Forrest Gump. I’ll rephrase to look smarter:) I bet a sh~t load of government people use this (Romans 13:1-2) passage as a cop-out, to justify everything for their personal advantage; which is likely the cause of a tremendous amount of problems for both Americans and the rest of the world. There’s only one answer (according the Jesus), and that’s the Goldenrule. We are an extremely dishonest and cop-out animal, hence we aren’t even aware of it (we’ll pass many little tests, but always fail the big / more important ones). The Goldenrule word alone is much harder to evade using cop-out deviation. Plus, Romans was a letter to the Romans, and Nero later convicted both Paul and Peter with the death penalty while in Rome (and Rome continued persecuting Christians for 300 years); therefore, Paul was probably writing bootlick.
Explaining Nero’s justification for killing Christians, Tacitus Annals 15.44.3 describes the Christian acts in Latin as: “pudenda confluunt celebranturque”:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/resolveform?lang=Latin (Tufts University), Find: pudenda:
2. Subst.: pŭdenda , ōrum, n. (sc. membra). a. The private parts (post-class.), Aus. Per. Odyss. 6; id. Idyll. 6, 85; Aug. Civ. Dei, 14, 17; Sen. ad Marc. 22, 1; Vulg. Nah. 3, 5. (Exactly same in my Harpers’ Latin Dict., Lewis & Short, 1879.)
(Also:) http://www.rostra.dk/latin/saxo.html, P:
pudendus, -a, -um 1 adi i.q. turpis 2 subst. n.pl. de genitalibus
“de Genitalibus” means “About the reproductive / genital organs” –QuickLatin translator (http://www.quicklatin.com/, $29).
“confluunt” means “They flow / flock / come together / abundantly” –QuickLatin translator (http://www.quicklatin.com/, $29).
“celebranturque” means “They are celebrated” –QuickLatin translator (http://www.quicklatin.com/, $29).
Sounds like an orgy to me, which included St. Peter and St. Paul, and only around 30 years after the death of Christ. Could it be possible that these early Christians – especially St. Peter – knew Christ’s principal instruction better than today’s mainstream Church? Let’s see, that’s 30 years versus 2000 years. ?.
By the way, QuickLatin translator definitions can also be found at http://lysy2.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/words.exe?de+genitalibus (Univ. of Notre Dame).
http://www.answers.com/pudenda, “pudendum”:
The human external genital organs, especially of a woman. Often used in the plural.
http://www.answers.com/vulva, “vulva”:
The external genital organs of the female are collectively known as the vulva (also sometimes called the pudenda).
http://www.answers.com/penis, “penis”:
Pudendal nerve entrapment is a condition characterized by pain on sitting and loss of penile (or clitoral) sensation and orgasm. Occasionally there is a total loss of sensation and orgasm.
By the way, Tacitus Annals is the earliest secular mention of Christianity:
http://www.entheology.org/library/winters/MARKBG.TXT, Background Against Which Mark Wrote His Famous Gospel, “Earliest Pagan Reference to ‘Christians’”:
The earliest ROMAN reference we have of the existence of Christians is from the early second century writings of the Roman historian, Tactitus. Writing somewhat sympathetically of the tortures imposed by the Emperor Nero on this group of men known as "Christians", he paused to reflect on the founder of Christianity, and the spread of Christianity to Rome
Now, I ottsta go on for about a half an hour, with references, explaining how free sex strongly disrupts the Roman marriage and prostitution standards (it was similar to the Old West). It has something to do with the reason a man doesn’t need to get married or pay a prostitute if he can get it free from a Christian.
“People look to me and say, ‘Is the end near, when is the final day? What’s the future of mankind?’ How do I know, I got left behind. Everyone goes through changes looking to find the truth. Don't look at me for answers. Don't ask me – I don't know.” –Ozzy Osbourne, 1981 [gloom rock]. That’s because “I” know.
Bustin’ through in 2002:
Let’s give O’Reilly a break. With my new Listen Up, I can hear the Catholic Church singin’: “You better beware, you better take care, you better watch out if you've got long black hair. … Does anyone know the way, did we hear someone say: ‘We just haven't got a clue what to do.’ Does anyone know the way, there's got to be a way to Block Buster!” –Sweet, 1973. Maybe with a Ballroom Blitz. (Hopefully, someday I’ll have the time to explain all that.)
Black prejudice against whites:
Open / free sex would end all the prejudice blacks have against white – so much that there’s an actual pride in the black community to help hide a black person who has committed a crime against a white person. Open / free sex desiring diversity in looks, is the only pure and full solution.
Today’s churches’ definition of love is the cause of this (Biblically condemned) prostitution:
http://www.askmen.com/dating/heidi_100/127_dating_girl.html / http://www.askmen.com/dating/heidi_100/127b_dating_girl.html, Are High Maintenance Women Worth It?:
High maintenance gals are arm candy, pure and simple. Their fascination with their own looks means that whenever they step out of the house, they look perfect. And guess what? When you're with someone who looks good, you look good too. It's not just self-aggrandizement either; there's no shame in feeling proud of being with the foxiest woman in the room at a party. She puts great effort into looking great, so when it pays off, more power to her! And you. … [however] For men who like to be challenged on a daily basis, the high maintenance girl is the perfect choice. She likes attention, compliments and fancy dinners, and she demands the best of all these things. She will keep you on your toes, refusing any response from you other than absolute respect. … the high maintenance woman is like a ravenous beast, always wanting more of everything. She will find faults in all your best efforts, and honestly, some women just aren't worth the bother. … In other words, if you're looking for an equal partnership, do not date these women.
Boy, I’ve dated a lot of these types (because that’s what’s mostly available in the singles arena [over the age of say 30]), which never leads to a second date: I mix with these kinds of dishonest prostitutes like how water mixes with grease. And believe me, they don’t have to be that great looking. And they actually do believe their one-sidedness is “equal partnership.” I hardly ever buy a woman a drink in a bar; hence I hardly ever “score.” Concerning both gold-diggers and today’s clergies (and, today, include Presidents), what our intelligent society thinks should be respected the most, is of the most evil. My diversity in looks / open sex advice is the only way to stop this kind of (Biblically condemned) prostitution. With today’s prideful advent of independent women, Cosmopolitan Magazine could change the world in one article. Revelation chapters 17 through 19 says it will eventually fall. I don’t think they’re talking about ugly women with all that “gold and silver” and “souls of men.” Open sex with a desire for diversity in looks is the only way, simply because mankind is selfish and evil and is not going to “just” change, and no prostitute or gold-digger can operate in a free sex society, because men will neither be sexually oppressed anymore, nor have the lustful desire for the more attractive. And all women today are some form of a wishful prostitute, because wearing jewelry is a very old way to show how expensive of a harlot one is, displaying where men have toiled and died in the mines for her. The power of human brainwash and pride explains why women think they don’t want open and diverse sex. They do down deep, even the ones with low libidos. By the way, this should answer the great mystery men have in trying to understand women. Once one of these overly desirous too-good-for-anybody women explained to me how a woman reaches a much greater orgasm with her hand then with a man. But then why do “ugly” women wet my bed so much? I think these overly desirous women are missing out on something. Greed and a desire for cruelty can overwhelm the human mind.
“Don't mess with a Missionary Man:
Well, the Missionary Man, he's got God on his side. He's got the saints and apostles backin' up from behind. Black eyed looks from those Bible books. He's a man with a mission. Got a serious mind. … ‘I've a message for you that you better believe.’” –The Eurythmics, 1986.
Hopefully soon, Jesus and I can sing to the “ugly”:
“How does it feel to be one of the beautiful people? Now that you know who you are, what do you want to be?” –The Beatles, 1967.
The vote’s in:
The majority of French people have decided that dishonest, backstabbing corruption is better than liberalism containing no superior intelligence. But, we’ll vacillate back, because liberalism is more fair and what we all agree is the way it should be. You see, liberalism (determining fairness) is much more difficult to reckon out. Conservatism is easy on the mind simply because it is default animalistic survival-of-the-fittest. You will think I’m crazy, but I think I’m the only living human who has got it all figured out. I wouldn’t be wasting my time if I didn’t think so. And no one can rationally explain to me how I’m wrong (about key teachings).
Conservatives are constantly bragging about how someone (one of their own) is so extremely fair and honorable. That just shows that real fairness and honor is the real generic goal, and will eventually win.
Restitution:
This here country’s so divided on the Iraq issue that we’d surely have another Civil War if we were geographically divided. But, I think the IRS should at least try to find a way to make those who supported the Iraqi war to be the only ones to pay the restitution. The IRS forcing those opposed to the war to pay for its continuance is like the draft.
Coca-Cola commercial:
“You give a little love and it all comes back to you.” Like I’ve said before, in the real world, when you give you usually don’t get much back. Or, everyone would be giving / loving more. That’s why it’s also called “sacrifice.” Open / free sex is the only pure / Godly way to give, that finds return. And it is sufficiently powerful, for the impoverished adult.
My stuff is very insulting to dumb people, so people with power aren’t going to like it.
George, it’s what’s for dinner:
One man for the safety of millions:
If George’s priority is the good and safety of the American people, then he would sell himself to the Iraqi people or al-Qaeda. Ironically, this would be the best possible single thing for the safety of all the Bush supporters and their families. But, none of them are smart enough to realize it. The “game” brainwash is the only thing they have been taught to think. And take Bill Clinton with him.
http://www.amazon.com/Borat-T-Shirt-Large-Stock-Within/dp/B000LYRV66/ref=sr_1_1/002-5901010-2891228?ie=UTF8&s=apparel&qid=1178509969&sr=1-1:
Hey, before I purchase this fine piece of apparel, I need to make sure I won’t be arrested for solicitation. So, government people who monitor my system, let me know?
Deep thoughts:
I wonder what our dogs might be thinking about our intelligence when we should “clean up after” them. I mean, the dog sees us taking it with us, and it’s stinking up the car as we’re driving home.
We’re all just talking baboons:
We only achieve because of our high communication skills. That means we don’t progressively surpass other animals until we listen. However, the bug in this software is when we hear the wrong thing: it can make us dumber than a baboon. Not only could it cause us to put a carburetor on backwards, or route the exhaust into the passenger compartment (to help the air pollution problem), but can make us run at a machine gun, and make you believe all the church lies and cop-outs. If you can really think on your own, you would realize the money is what really controls the majority’s mind. Things must be getting pretty apparent with the New York Times, NBC News, etc., going liberal.
http://www.sandiegozoo.org/animalbytes/t-orangutan.html, Mammals: Orangutan:
Orangutans have even been known to watch villagers use boats to cross the local waterways, and then untie a boat and ride it across the river on their own!
If all animals could talk, we might find that we aren’t really the smartest one.
Usually when someone insults another’s intelligence, to counter, the one insulted will start talking faster, demonstrating that speed marks the greater aptitude. But that’s just like running faster at the machine gun that is going to kill you. During WWII, everyone knew the only way to win the game was to have more people willing to run at machine guns. You simply use artful communication to achieve it. Mix it with self-centered animalistic emotional pride, and let it simply overwhelm all the baboons and it’s easy. Both sides can do it. I like people who would run at a machine gun who think I’m nuts.
How come Hannity doesn’t want the earth more green?:
--By wanting to suppress green advice, by stressing some hypocrisy, knowing we live in a dumb country? I guess for profit from the ones most in the dark. Well, keep up the same work Sean: When superior intelligence comes down the pike, examples of evil will need to be pointed to. By the way, assuming all is of good cause, a little hypocrisy in exchange for a wealth of righteous influential teaching, is worth the trade. Duh.
More conservatives are being victimized by school teachers:
Darcie Esson had sex with an almost 18 year-old student while her children where sleeping in the same room. I’m really proud to live in a society that knows what can really hurt us and what can’t. Let’s also make sure we don’t reveal the entire Cho video, so no one can perceive a way to prevent mass shootings again. Question: If, instead, she had sex with her husband while their children where sleeping, which happens a lot in this world, then would it be victimizing the children? Ah-hah! You see, it all has to do with that devil marriage standard; argued based on the Bible word “fornication.” What do you think people did in Kansas when they lived in those one-room sod houses? That’s probably one of the reasons why we feel right doing it in the dark. (Also, so He won’t see.) And the kids would probably care less. And the risk of failure with safe-sex is less than being in an automobile accident. And, not only do we allow children to ride in cars, but we allow them down to 14 to cut me off in traffic at 75 mph. And of course, fittingly, the evil that I’m talking about are also the ones who try to hide the facts about STD prevention. If these two weren’t using safe-sex, then I’d say the real evil won also in that aspect. Statutory rape laws were in effect, e.g., in the 60s, before “incurable” STDs anyway. She was also charged with being “a person in a position of trust.” Ah-hah! – What if the person who trusted her… was her husband? I do think a teacher having sex with a student can cause unfair favoritism; therefore, I suggest we eventually get to the point where teachers have sex with all their students (don’t skip anyone) who are basically grown up. Ah-hah! – So it’s because America’s dictators are against free / unconditional sex? Ah-hah! – It’s because they submit to the churches’ marriage / dishonest prostitution standard; and, are too stupid to read the actual Bible. Ah-hah! – It’s just good to know who the real enemy is: stupidity. And, if it’s the ignorant society standards that victimizes the adolescents, then who’s the real evil? This whole covering up the sex stuff, including the knowledge of it from our children, is entirely based on a… lie. Unless you can’t see how “cover up” can relate to “a lie.” Suppression of information is something Hitler and many Popes wanted. The media should be with me one this one, but they are far too educated. Penalties have to be very severe and excessive to combat “God’s” natural desires. I’m guessing young adolescents should only have sex with people around their own age, for size reasons. Anyone’s, any age’s, knowledge of God greatest gift to mankind is horribly taboo, despicable and sickening, because the medieval church had to mount a lot of pressure to win the lie / cover up. If the kids would have accidentally woken up and briefly witnessed the atrocity, they could never become a victim of it’s filth until… somebody tells them they are a victim. Which, then, can certainly lead them to crime, drugs and / or suicide. So who’s the real evil? The reason the police finally found out about it is because the nearly 18-year-old “victim” was “bragging” about it with his friends. How much dumber can society really be? Really! Does anybody want to solve real “problems” with today’s society or not? If I was the (female) teacher, in my defense, I’d say, “When the student finally talked me into it, I didn’t think that there could really exist that bad of an outside evil, especially in this day and age. And, so extremely dumb of an evil that it actual believes it is good.” Then I’d be in prison for life – practicing that kind of 1st Amendment non-bootlick. Is it a crime for a trusted college professor to sleep with a student? Ah-hah!
They say there’s a growing number of teachers having sex with students. That’s probably because this younger generation is more promiscuous with more unattached / unconditional notions. I suggest creating another fatal STD. And don’t ever again allow in any degree of treatment or cure (unless certain rich people get it.) O’Reilly would sure approve it, and find delight. – Anything’s better than promiscuity without church and/or state controls. And more stress the importance of earning marriage by not only waiting until marriage, but for all financial earnings and disagreements for the female. And, most importantly, making certain this is not explained, especially with the word “pussywhipped,” because it sounds too much like the real definition of the Biblical condemned word “prostitution” when it gets explained. Instead, it will be the church’s definition of a good man.
Boulder High School gets lesson on having free sex and approval to use illegal drugs:
Yeah, things are still easy to stereotype even in the younger “Unhooked Generation.” One way to look at it is when you are having sex, then the phone rings, you can talk clearly and sensibly. But not while on drugs.
Say no to drugs; but, say yes to sex:
This is your brain on drugs:
This is your brain on sex:
Any question on the right way to go?
Finally, peace in and around Israel:
After 60+ years of hostilities, folks over there sure are lucky they have smart religious leaders, instead of crackpots like me, who are so loony and twisted that I think it’s okay when teachers have sex with students, and actual have the audacity to promote even more.
I didn’t know I had competition:
http://www.westmichiganmusic.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=560, “The Gods Of Kansas” [name of band]:
For those about to rock, this band salutes you! There is a band in Kalamazoo that will satisfy those urges to rock!
Well, even in Kalamazoo, one has to think cool when naming their band. The only better band name can only be “Yo Mama’s Big Fat Booty Band,” currently touring nationwide.
We want this land to be ours, bad, and we’ll stop at nothing to get it:
In the year 2000:
What would people have thought 20 years ago if they knew that the 21st century would bring things like “MarketWatch News Archive - Yahoo! Finance”? I told my mom, she’s got to get one of these www clickity click click clink things. But, still living in the ‘60s, she’s proud that she still hasn’t yet purchased a microwave oven. Still, I told her if she got one of them www clickity click click clink things she could read all about the ‘60s. I said even people in New York and California have ‘em… for now… until Microsoft gets its way.
“Be a simple kind of man. Be something you love and understand. Be a simple kind of man. Oh, won’t you do this for me son if you can?” –Lynyrd Skynyrd, 1973. I’m tryin’. I still don’t have a cell phone. But everyone should know by now that I’ve got one of them www dot clickity click click click things.
Do It Anyway –Martina McBride, 2007:
Hear, hear. Now, the Goldenrule is God’s prime, strict message for mankind in its creation of a much better world for everyone. However, practically all people go to church or are religious wishing to shun the Goldenrule as much as possible while concentrating solely on their own personal relationship with God. So, for the time being, for your personal individual self, let others like Martina McBride be your savior.
Now he’s smart …er:
I’ve noticed O’Reilly has calmed his cookie, arguing with more of a clean, intelligent temperament, since I explained in my last smart letter how anger equates to stupidity.
O’Reilly and conservatives don’t care about the lives of these men – give me a break:
All that matters to them is winning the game, and saving face. When they say “Support our troops” they are really lying saying “Support the war; right or wrong; with no concern for the well being of the troops, who really just support the conservatives.” The reason conservatives pat our troops on the back is because they want them to die for their game, and face saving, that’s all. And history has always shown, they are definitely gullible enough to do it:
Hey, none in Hays, Kansas? Let’s get out there and support more patriotism, to get some more points to make Kansas look bigger, rah, rah, rah!
Ronald Reagan is even smart enough to know, that had to hurt:
Montage of fallen Americans:
None of these men would be dead if any one of those guy who already knew it all, would have followed my February 1998 advice. Well, (ignorant) pride first, fairness and God second. – That’s the easy to figure stereotype.
If troops had any lick of sense at all, they’d sing to O’Reilly: “You spin me around (like a record)” –Dead Or Alive, 1985.
This Iraq war sure is an easy Judgment call for God. It’s getting to the point now where we don’t care if we were in the wrong, the question is now, what are we going to do about it to protect us from those who rightfully want to kill us. I’m sorry to be the only one to tell you, but restitution and being nice to those who want to kill us is the only fair solution, and likely the only solution – look how long the Palestinians are still angry about Israel’s unfairness. Our unfairness in the Middle East should cause problems for as long, and probably much longer. But, there’s no way the most evil people in the world are going to pay restitution or even just be nice to those who rightfully want to kill us. I know how the animal thinks: simply watch Fox News. And they are SO dumb they actually believe they are good people. The Democrats don’t want to talk restitution to the American people because that’s not want the people want to hear. I don’t know if excessive greed and stupidity brought down the Roman Empire, but it will the United States. Eventually they’re gonna get us. And the most we escalate (and not admit our unfairnesses), the sooner it should be. I’m might be wrong here (I don’t have a crystal ball), but since North Korea has the bomb, in collaboration, I’m guessing Iran already has some too, otherwise they wouldn’t be so confident. I doubt they want it to happen, but they may be well prepared to defend themselves in the short range: the U.S. can easily be very threatening and not even know it. We’re used to being the bully and just taking others’ lunch money, and actually believe we deserve it (we are very, very good at that – that’s where religious cop-outs help the conscience). Of course, me suggesting this just presents a challenge to President Bush (because of the “short range” part). I’m guessing George will do some air strikin’ after the election in 2008. We’ll all think it’s for the better, then in ten years we’ll find out we were wrong. I don’t know if we had fairness on our side in WWII, but I know we don’t in Iraq, Iran or North Korea. If anything, the way we think, we shouldn’t be the one with nuclear weapons. Of course, we all eat animals too, so it all figures. I think the CIA “just trusts” what the Iranians are “just” showing them.
“Now you’re messin’ with a son of a bitch.” –Nazareth, 1975:
Jude Bonner in the 1972 Gunsmoke episode Hostage! is like President Bush when he said okay to killing Iraqi civilians. “You tell him [George W. Bush] is satisfied!” The only problem is lots of people don’t fully know it. Let me know the difference. Come on??? Aw, you bunch of cowards! Like maybe there’s a difference between someone who beats a woman (and gives her the knowledge of Ronald Reagan) and someone who burns them alive. I’m convinced: it’s a dumbness problem. !. After thousands of years of the same old same old, the world is only going to improve when “I” become religious leader. Because my stuff was pursued to find the compete truth, and can now be “summed up” in One Word (to overrule cop-outs). Yes, I know “George’s” competition (terrorists) are the same way. That just shows how it’s not right. The actor of that character, William Smith, was an excellent character for Westerns and the like. I guessing he could have been another Clint Eastwood if it hadn’t been for that part. But George Bush will continue with a lot of well praised rolls for the rest of his life. I’m convinced: it’s a dumbness problem. In other words, if everyone could fully see and actually feel the pain and suffering inflicted, they’d become a true Christian instantly: They’d have some of the full knowledge of God. But, until “somebody” (not “nobody”: me) communicates that kind of information to them, it will continue. And God will continue to see and fully feel it; and pressure me to write more. You’d even wish no pain upon your enemy (those who actually hurt you), because you would appall it so much, and would only do it for the good deed of protecting an innocent person.
By the way, this episode will air Sunday, May 27 at 7am and 5pm eastern time on TVLAND.
Episode not to be confused with “The Hostage” which aired in 1965.
I will give George this: Bill Clinton was ethically worse (and I’m not talking about Monica Lewinski).
American soldiers:
“You’re all fodder for the turkey buzzards” as far as George W. Bush is concerned.
Yo Ho Ho!:
No, I’m not talking about Pirates of the Caribbean. I’m talking about the establishment of the polygamous Mormon Church. You know, not my … by yo …. Okay, I know it’s not funny if I have to explain it. Yes… I can do better: When is someone going to ask George W. Bush why this decade is technically called “the zeros”? Now that’d be funny! He-He-He! He’d answer, “Because no one knows it.”
Respect for families of fallen American soldiers and Jerry Falwell’s family?:
Sure. Also, if you know God, then you must have the same respect for the families of Saddam Hussein and those Iraqi insurgents who have killed American soldiers. Too difficult for your mind? Either way, intelligent “constructive” criticism is always appropriate (via the media), and is more respectful to God and mankind. But, I know few who can accomplish that. So, I advise the vast majority of you to just keep your mouths shut. For example: If you slam Jerry Falwell’s agenda “just because” it opposes your personally wishes, then you are just an idiot and give him more supremacy (e.g., the ’70s). But, if you point in the actual Bible and/or via Biblical word corruptions how he’s wrong, then that is the intelligent method. Then when he ignores your intelligent / truthful findings, then you can better prove him to others as the idiot. But, if your voice is very limited, then you’ll have an entire country of folks that “just think” they’re smart. And George W. Bush has proved what can happen when one “just thinks” they are smart. In just one word (which I haven’t yet said) I could bring down the entire Church’s sexual corruption, and it’s a word none of you have ever heard. Hint: It’s a word that Jesus / God directly set up 2000 years ago, to exclusively support me today. It’s pretty cleaver too (to bypass Middle Age corruption), but that figures since it’s coming from God. I know you think I’m making this up.
“Someone told me love would all save us. But, how can that be – look what love gave us: a world full of killing and blood spilling – that world never came. And they say that a hero could save us, I’m not gonna stand here and wait. I’ll hold onto the wings of the eagles, watch as we all fly away. Now that the world isn’t ending, it’s love that I’m sending to you. It isn’t the love of a hero, and that’s why I fear it won’t do.” –Spider-Man Soundtrack, 2002.
Mr. Critical – I can show you amazing things:
-- Home (Index) --