Subject:  Sweeping the floor

 

5-25-06

 

Hannity and O’Reilly, at Fox News.com blocked my emails April 29, 2006.  I’m-a guessin’ Mr. Critical’s upsettin’em too much: “the truth burns.”  Hey, I thought these people were “fair, balanced and unafraid.”  Ha-ha-ha!  If you can’t take the heat, get out of the business!  Hannity has kind of an anger control problem / immature / self-interested.  But that’s entertaining.  I like it.  I agree with some of his thesis (I think I could argue those righteous points better, though) and disagree or am indifferent with the rest.  O’Reilly is kinda the same way; he just looks like he’s been doing it longer.  Verbal interruptions seem to be their norms.  Sometimes upsetting when I want to hear what the guest is saying.  Oh my… I think if they end up in a fist fight with the guest, the public would like it.  Eventually we’ll just have hockey during prime time.  Or maybe bring back the Roman games.  Well, if there were more guys like Hannity and O’Reilly, it would end up being that way.  You betcha they’d bring back slavery if they could – they ain’t gonna say that though.  Hannity, you look tough:  Next time… take a swing at the guy.  Hey… no Jerry Springer fakin’.  We want to see real, and if you hit somebody we know you’ve got the mind to make us believe it’s real.  O’Reilly, just wait till you get a little guy or a woman.  (Actually O’Reilly would be a great man to have if he would spin to total righteousness.  But, no way: once someone states the wrong thing, especially publicly, it’s impossible for them to admit error – unless it becomes his party’s majority. – In other words, he doesn’t innovate, he just follows.)  O’Reilly likes to incorrectly pithy his popinjay by using words that most people don’t understand like “pithy” and “popinjay.”

 

I don’t discriminate: I intend to find fault in everybody, so those mature enough to take my heat, hooray!

 

All in all, when a “24 hour” news channel cuts off my insight, especially when it’s per requested, it’s either because my stuff is very, very bad or very, very good.  (Whichever way you want to look at it.)

 

I think people who excel in their ability to be educated (PhD’s, etc.) seem to be the ones who believe society’s brainwash the most.  Their minds seem to be set for fast input and solid comprehension; therefore, have less aptitude and time available for large scale reckoning / ponderance outside of that box – of which burns more calories (is more difficult).  I think it’s also easier and quicker to learn when you better “just trust.”  Me, I’m slow, but accurate. – Reviewing all angles – PhD’s don’t do that:  You’re not going to pass the exam if you pass the status quo.  If they furnish “an” answer to a new question “quicker” than me, people with think their answer is more correct (people who “just trust”).  Without someone like me, progression can only come by making a lot of mistakes first: learning the hard way.  How many car doors had to fly off until PhD’s figured to hinge them from the front?  I think the majority of the public would agree and change with most of my stuff, if they had it explained to them (correctly).  Most of my stuff cannot be explained (correctly) in one sentence.  So, come to me now, and take what is yours.  Of course I said that to Bill Clinton in 1998, but he chose to “already know it all.”  Nothing has changed; things have just gotten worse, confirmed to me on 9/11 and the latest Iraq.  I’m probably the only one who can rationally negotiate with our enemy leaders.  They would eventually understand my definition of fair and ethical; much better than an American leader could.  Once I knew all the correct facts, I would be able to provide the best solution: things that neither side would consider / ponder.  I would be able to reckon out details, technicalities, and new problems consistently.  Partial hint: obstinate greed, unfairness, and more lies / tricks / bluffs isn’t the (ultimate) answer.  But then, a well educated American negotiator isn’t going to know anything else: it would be an all new undertaking.  Otherwise, our children should start singing a 1987 Men Without Hats hit.  The technology for weapons of mass destruction is here and it’s not going to go away.  More and more countries are going to develop their own in the future (to be included in the pool of being treated fair).  Countries can either be treated fair (which is what we don’t want to currently do) and develop these technologies as our allies with our knowledge and gain, or be bombed where they will develop them underground for the soul purpose of using them.  The only reason we don’t want others to have weapons of mass destruction is so we can bully those countries that much longer.  Most Americans don’t have the slightest idea that we are the biggest bully in the world.  That’s why we got our black eye on 9/11.  I don’t believe they did it just for the fun of it – what takes me seconds to realize others would not be able to get if they lived to be a thousand years old.  The less the United States is a bully, the less other countries will want to develop weapons of mass destruction.  Let’s just not do that anymore:  Let’s start working on that Jesus Christ peace, love, brotherhood-of-man world.  Okay?  How’m I supposed to travel far and near when everybody just wants to kill me for revenge because I’m an American?  Things are NOT going to change until someone starts (correctly) repeating my stuff (and insults).  If there was more (correct) insultin’ and less bootlickin’ then progress would go much faster.  (But that “correct” part is the trick.)

 

I hear tell coffee’s now good for you.  Is that from people smarter or dumber?

 

I saw the movie United 93.  What’s the deal: after waiting through all the credits, no bloopers.

 

Specific logical Iran advice:

“N” comes before “Q”; therefore, we should have dealt with Iran before Iraq.  There’s my logical advice.  Or, go ahead and blast ‘em, wham-bam their entire infrastructure, set’em back 50 years, let’em know who’s boss and how it feels to live a continuous state of unsurpassable terror.  Because, I still need a good picture of a dead little girl holding onto her doll.  That’ll keep me Rockin’ and a Rollin’, and other Americans can talk proud again, about us later building some of it back.  I also want more – I’ve already got some – videos of U.S. soldiers shooting innocent civilians, so I can organize something up when computers become fast enough to handle lots of email videos.  Text explaining our brave and/or intelligent reasons for shooting them would also be nice.  Has anybody asked this Ahmadinejad character if he is willing to practice what he preaches (Christianity), regarding his letter to President Bush, concerning innocent Israeli lives which he has threatened?  Maybe dare’s duh solution.  Somebody give me his email: I’ll do it.  I know it’d look pretty silly if the average American Christian hypocrite tried to do it – I’m probably the only one who could explain it with credence.  That could even lead to him giving up his nuclear program.  My 1998 paper seemed to affect Qaddafi – why else did he send me that letter (I assume our government monitors my stuff).  Ahmadinejad speaks quite ethically but generically.  He’s probably not aware of things like why we still wouldn’t give all the money we spent liberating Iraq to our poor anyway.  He doesn’t understand we keep our poor poor so to motivate them to work.  He doesn’t understand that we are more evil / self-centered than he knows.  He doesn’t understand that all our Christian ethics have been overruled by our cop-outs.  And, since we don’t even know this stuff ourselves, how could he know it?  He should have explained “why” it is “fair” to give more to the poor; e.g., like how 200 years ago, in Kansas City, according to Lewis and Clark, one could live a very healthy and abundant diet and have a much sturdier shelter, all with a lot less effort than someone today who has graduated eighth grade, and didn’t have to rely on anybody telling you what to do.  They say it was a literal “Garden of Eden.”  It’s not like that today.  Having fences and agriculture is better (if it’s organic), but it allows an easy way for the rich to motivate the poor to continually work; and, it makes it seem unfair to give to people who have failed in our society, when we don’t see the free food anymore.  See, I’m probably the only one in history who has said it right.

 

We should rename it to what it really is:

We might have less insurgent problems if we renamed Iraq to the New United States of the East.  Or, New Texas, and rename Baghdad to New Crawford.  Because, at least they would think we’re honest.  Or, Baghdad could be renamed to the descriptive title: Duh Head of Spurting Oil from a Shaft Bounded by a Bush.

 

Afghanistan (or anywhere):

Throw some more Jesus Christs at ‘em:  Drop food packages or inexpensive sincere / touching gifts out of an airplane in suspected insurgent areas.  Let’em know we want to be friends.  I’m thinking baseball cards, but I’m sure you can think of something better.  If you prove you’re good guys, they’ll go along with your new politics.  I tried this method years ago.  Yes, I felt weird doing it, but it worked like an illegal alien.  I had this guy who wanted to kill me for still dating the same girl he wanted for himself.  After months of miscellaneous threats, and notes on my car, I asked how would Jesus handle it.  So while shopping with her, I bought something nice for him.  She told me he couldn’t figure out why I got it for him.  The threats ended and he was actually pretty friendly to me from then on.  Are Jesus’ teachings… “powerful”?  Well, they come from God.  Jesus is the most popular person that has ever lived.  If God didn’t give This Man the correct inspiration, then we all better just give it up.  In 2002 I recommended that kind of gesture be done for Saddam Hussein, to get him to tell us about his weapons of mass destruction.  But, you’re right: I guess it wouldn’t have worked.

 

How dumb can we go:

I don’t know how kids are today, but if I scored with the great looking 28 year old teacher when I was in junior high, my palms would be sore from so many of my friends, and many new friends I didn’t even know I had, giving me five.  When I am 80, I would still have the picture up of me surrounded by all my friends with their arms around me, so I would never forget how good life can be.  Or, in many people’s minds, how “victimized” I once was.  Again, my main agenda is to show how dumb everyone really is:  I have this weird theory that it would be a better society if we were all more aware of what can really hurt us and what really can’t….  Automobile accidents, cancer, corrupt doctors, going down the stairs too quickly when first waking up.  These are things that are much more likely to hurt us.  Even teenage girls who are able to seduce their attractive male teachers. – Technically (using birth control & safe sex) the girl is not in any way a “victim” until… “society” tells her she is.  Then she WILL BE a victim.  Since effective birth control, society is still ignorantly conservative because our parents adamantly taught us that way – no other reason.  Society: more dumb or dumber?  “Dummy mummies” (preserved dead people).  Many parents still think abstinence advice alone works better than adding effective birth control and effective disease prevention advice.  Parents who have pregnant teenagers: dumb or dumberer?  In addition to the condom, nonoxynol-9 spermicide (at Wal-Mart, Osco, etc.) actually kills the spreading HIV virus, but nobody knows that.  Only one in twenty are allergic to it in the slightest way.  National AIDS Hotline: evil or evilerer?  Using both condom and spermicide should make the protection factor, what, a million to one?  Now, don’t misunderstand, I’m just proving how dumb and gullible everyone is: I’m not suggesting for anyone to break any laws.  Because society is extremely dumb on this subject, it will cause the teenager to be a victim.  So, you do hurt an innocent person if you have sex with someone under age.  There should be lots of over-aged women for you perverts to wine and dine.  Though, if we put in prison every male teacher, stepfather, etc. who would bed a seductive well-built 15 year old, probably nine-tenths of the adult male population would be getting a free meal every day.  Currently, I really don’t recommend anyone advocating or trying to take on this subject.  This entails a very high degree of societal dumbness, and the PhD’s who “just trust” will eat you alive.  Only someone like me can address it.  The tangents will make you not only lose the argument, but you will be blackballed for life.  For example, you don’t even know that the Bible word of “fornication” (sometimes “sexual morality”) only meant to “buy or sell into prostitution” in the original Greek.  Not being married had nothing to do with the original definition: it was strictly a money deal.  It’s that the word is corrupted, not the Bible.  Even non-corrupted verses you are NOT aware of: After discussing the problems of marriage, overruling the Old Testament, Matt. 19:10-12 Jesus Himself commands us to not marry.  You have to know that a eunuch can still have and enjoy sex, he just can’t reproduce.  There were many then pagan cults who castrated (testes removed) themselves for open sex rituals. (Glad to be living today.)  Also, the “let him” (N/KJV) is not in the original Scripture.  So, what’s the big deal? -- Today’s churches say marriage is the prerequisite for sex, but Jesus actually preached the opposite.  I know you’re thinkin’ “no way!  That would mean that the people we trust the most are the most dishonest, and that we are very dumb and gullible.”  Yeah, I like my job.  This subject is the basis for a tremendous amount of problematic control, even if you’re an atheist.  The church against sex outside of marriage causes a tremendous amount of today’s atheists.  You see, low libido clerics still use it erroneously as their “ticket into heaven” cop-out.  And, high (gifted) libidos only find sexual insult from the church.  A tremendous amount of Golden Rule can be had if people became more (correctly) religious.  There’s more; but, this is opening a major issue; and now is not the right time to go into depth.  Christianity is the largest religion in the world.  I think before puberty, I would not have wanted any teacher to touch me.  After puberty, I guess it would have depended on what she looked like.

 

Duke Rape Case:

You mean today, instead of one having to “prove” someone is guilty, someone has to prove their innocence or be convicted; then still not get out of it?  Sounds like more saving face.  There's a big umbrella casting shade over an empty chair, on some beach, somewhere.  When our justice people are the most unjust, then surely somebody other than me should be able to figure out how of fix it.  Maybe not, he got reelected.  This case gives credence to the Bible telling us that we are too stupid to know how to judge correctly, therefore rationale for leaving it to Jesus to decide each case.  Of course, today’s cop-outs overrule Jesus’ fair judgment promises so much that everyone believes that if justice doesn’t get done here on earth, it won’t get done it one’s afterlife; thereby causing more reasons for crime, revenge, unfairness, etc.  Many pastors do care for “the least” because they know it’s their only way into Heaven; but, don’t preach it because they know the money (hence the sinners) will leave their Church.  Therefore, still, they only seek their own desires.  They also probably feel more special if they do it and nobody else does it.  Only guys like me are able to preach what Jesus really wants said.  He died so apparently I (only) will tell you!  Again, today, you have to preach that anything else is a cop-out or it’s not going to work.  I think it’s pretty cool that I’m probably the only one in Christendom that’s preaching what Jesus really wants preached, in today’s extreme cop-out society.  I bet most of you just can’t understand why Jesus would care about “the least.”  And/or, you’re “too smart” to understand why Jesus would not want you to overrule His demands.  A tremendous amount of people will say that they will worry about all that when they get to their afterlife; but, Jesus states in Matt. 25:34-46 that you need to worry about it now, while you’re still alive.  I bet a lot of people don’t understand why Jesus expects us to help “the least” while we are still alive.  You see, all those people who you are supposed to help are living with you… now.  Some will say that what I speak is standard and elementary – no, people do NOT know what I’m saying (before I say it): cop-outs vastly rule.

 

Want me to quit?  Just think about what really can and can’t hurt you; then be fair.  Or, dangle a little carrot in front of me.

 

Great White Band Manager Revenge Case:

More dummerering:  Society has to realize what is criminal and what is not.  Negligence is not criminal.  Daniel Biechele should only be fined for violating fire regulations: same penalty as if there was not a fire.  Civil penalties are very well in order, but a criminal penalty is unfair.  How many of us have driven beyond the speed limit?  About 100%?  What if that was part of a terrible accident?  Should 100% of us be in prison?  If there is no “intent” to kill people, only intent to be an idiot and violate thought red-tape bothersome fire regulations to simply embellish the show (with the “intent” of pleasing fans more), then the penalty should equate to the violation (plus, civil restitution) regardless if it causes a tragedy or not.  Even the club owner put up the soundproofing with the “intent” to be good to his complaining neighbors -- most people wouldn’t give a rat’s fanny.  All of us are stupid.  All of us are negligent of the rules at times, especially the government.  Jail will not stop mistakes.  Jail has not stopped mistakes.  Jail will stop evil intent.  We would do a much better service to society to jail the Duke rape case prosecutor.  His “intent” is to ruin innocent peoples’ entire lives, just to save face.  That kind of “intent” is by far the most evil.  But the vast majority is too dumb to realize that.  Now, this stuff is easy for me to figure.  Why is it impossible for others to figure?  The question should be: how much dummerer is everyone else compared to me?  I don’t even watch the news that often, but when I do, I get all kinds of examples to work with to show how dumb everybody really is.  This stuff is taking up too much of my time.  Please, let’s all “try” to be smarter.  Especially in that West Warwick case: I watched the news that day: all the “smart” and “official” people were running around trying to figure out why the fire spread so quickly:  Apparently, the dangers of combining the safe-to-the-touch sparklers with the soundproofing foam was something unknown in the business at the time.  I’m sure Biechele wasn’t thinking it was going to cause such a fire; where they’d even lose a band member.  It’s just an unfortunate accident nobody wanted to happen, or tried to make happen.  Superior Court Judge Francis Darigan Jr. is just another worthless, mindless animal (but probably has high communication skills).  In the eyes of fairness, he is the one that should go to prison.  Jesus assures his superiorness will be shown his similar mistakes in life and then will be punished equally for Biechele’s punishment.  What makes me sick is that those types actually think they’re just.  I’ve argued the unfairness of manslaughter criminal laws since I was in High School; nobody has convinced me in the slightest how I’m wrong.  I’ve only been convinced how everybody is just a big idiot, causing a strong pressure to make it my duty to God to attempt to correct it.  (If I said it any other way [non-insulting], I would not be saying it as “accurately.”)  Now, others are smarter than me regarding fixing my transmission, etc., but concerning ethics and how people should be treated, no one surpasses my analysis.  “Excessive selfishness” and “favoritism” are the main culprits.  What I’m working on makes WWII look like nothing.  Delay of these solutions will just cause continued future problems.  Although we all now know to not use the little black book but our new Great White book telling the number of feet to keep between your gerb and your eggshell foam.

 

The Catch-22:

What I need to do is stay in my house all by myself all the time, then I won’t make a mistake that hurts anyone.  But if I do, I won’t have proof that I didn’t do a crime.  So, how can I not do anything, and also make sure I am constantly using my credit card or something to prove where I am?

 

The Da Vinci Code book and movie:

I never read the book, but remained awake during most of the movie.  In the last few years, until recent commentary, many people who read fast with unyielding comprehension expressed that this was valid evidence that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, etc., as the researchers and publishers tried to make people believe (which is why it did so well: “60.5 million” – wow!).  But, stuff like a “V” that can be found in just about any picture, moving Mary’s leaning image from a disciple to Jesus, and drawn by someone who lived 1500 years after Christ; etc. as evidence that they were married, is what is called “very, very far-fetched.”  Yet, people are gullible for just about anything, depending on “who” says it (wealthy book publishers), not analyzing what it is saying.  People who read fast and comprehend well: dumb or dumber?  The news people recently ridiculed Churches for telling about the invalidity of the movie, e.g., “try to understand: it’s just a movie: it’s f-i-c-t-i-o-n!” even to the point where Tom Hanks himself had to say it.  But if the Churches didn’t widely censure the movie to attain such ridicule, most people would still be believing it as rational / trustable conclusions.  Even if the conclusions were true, it doesn’t mean a dang thing: What the New Testament says is still all that would matter.  Of course, “people” would somehow still use it as just another kind of cop-out.  I could easily rearrange people on a picture to make it look like they’re having sex.  Would that be proof that they did?  “Dumberer” is the most correct conclusion.  I.e., the government, media and religious leaders are “dumber” than me, and the public is “dumberer” than them.  When I die, there won’t be any more superior intelligence.  Unless… folks start listening to me about learning the correct way to think.  The popularity of this book does show society’s strong desire for unraveling church deception.

 

Maybe soon they’ll be accusations that George W. Bush isn’t trying to find Osama bin Laden… because they’re lovers.  Well, the proof is in the picture: “60.5 million” fast comprehenders would “just believe it.”

 

If you want to technically blow their story out of the water, any well versed Christian scholar would know that the Last Supper was on a stibadium / sigma couch (triclinium), not the kind of table Da Vinci drew.  Da Vinci apparently didn’t have the information we have today.  In addition to the catacomb paintings, etc., the original Greek confirms “reclined,” “lie down,” “being spread,” etc. instead of “sat down” and “being furnished” in Matt. 26:20; Mark 14:15,18; Luke 22:12,14; and John 13:12,23,28 (see Baker Books’ Greek-English Interlinear, editor: Green, 1996 to start with).

 

Immigration Issue:

Thousands of Mexicans want to come into our country and work for peanuts, and we can’t figure out a way to use that to our advantage?  Are we dumb, stupid or just idiots?  What if millions of space aliens came down, and wanted to work all our jobs, where we would still reap the benefits – you mean we wouldn’t go for that?  If I could communicate with a beaver, and told him I’ll build your dam, would he be smart enough to let me do it, or would he tell me to get out of his area?  Would that make beavers dumber or smarter than humans?

 

I’m probably giving you all way too much, in a way too small period of time.

 

Iraqi religious sects who kill innocent people of the other sects (or anybody):

I bet they’ve never been religiously taught that one is never justified in hurting an innocent person.  Of course, that sort of teaching could only come from someone like me (a nobody).  So it simply ain’t gonna get taught.  That means a grim future.

 

Patriotic ass-kickers:

All you patriotic Country & Western ass-kickers should try to realize, what I do is the best example of practicing American Freedom, unlike your wish to suppress the same.  I still wouldn’t kill a little kid for it, unlike you singers / writers who would (or, I should say “have” as a result).  I guess being a moron would be your excuse to God.  Why is it that the patriotic morons who yack about “freedom” the most, are the ones quickest to try to suppress it?  Of course, there are different degrees of dumb:  Personally, I worry more about past written death threats from religious fanatics / hate crime / KKK types that call me “Satin” (sic).

 

9/11 Revenge Case:

From “just a formality” to “America you lost, [Moussaoui] won”:  Quite a headline.  My heart goes out to all 9/11 victims, as well as all innocent victims in the world.  I like the comments saying that the Life verdict makes us better than them.  Hear, hear!  Try to understand that that’s the kind of phrase that no other ethic can beat.  Matt. 5:14-16 (Sermon on the Mountain: to the “multitudes”): 14“You are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden. 15Nor do they light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house. 16Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven.”  Opinion that Moussaoui deserves death may be correct; but, then death would be consistently deserving to anyone who plans to kill innocent people, or even just supports it (just about everybody).  Even (other) soldiers (and their voters) who kill innocents.  I don’t think anyone is looking at it that way, because to them it’s totally a game.  The “game” is their only reason, not logic, not intelligence, just monkey-see-monkey-do high communication trust.  I know all this is hard to understand.  Killing someone who killed an innocent person is not a sin; however, I am against capital punishment for several reasons that I don’t feel like getting into right now.  But, I do highly recommend to “begin” a different / more accurate religious agenda, where we all hear… … Wait a minute… Hannity just interrupted me…: “Who! are! you!?”  Nobody. … where everyone hears the true…  He’s repeating his same question… I’m “nobody.”  Again, same question… Again, I’m “nobody”:  In other words, it doesn’t matter who I am, what only matters is “what I am saying.”  Again, same question… “Nobody!” … Ow, that hurt Hannity!  Uhhh… oww… oueeee… I didn’t know O’Reilly was standing behind me.  If I live though this, I’ll get back to ya.

 

Ehhhh!

 

Mr. Critical – Pushing beyond the envelope.

 

-- Home (Index) --