05-18-09: Americans love living a lie

Subject: Americans love living a lie

Whether it be artificial salvation cop-outs, or blocking out “why” terrorists want to kill us, sweeping problems under the rug works well when you have money… until 9/11, or when you die. Then it’s too late. Sure, the country looks good on the surface, but all the dirt is under the carpet. Las Vegas is a great example. Everything looks top quality there, but many people know the real price.

5-18-09

“News that shapes our world – Fair and Balanced”?:

You should be able to agree that if it’s not Fair and Balanced concerning the Amiriyah civilian shelter, slant drilling, etc., then it will warp the world, right?

Has the stress of current events got the best of you?:

Someone’s automatic reply to my last email blast said: “I will be out of the office starting 03/27/2009 and will not return until 07/27/2030.” Sounds like this guy could use a good break. He must be a Republican. Well, hopefully all my stuff will be common knowledge by the time he reads it. It’s about time someone took a good break.

See… we can have two bosses:

Maybe have Obama run the political system, and have me in charge of religion.

Cat-choo! Hope I don’t have the flu.

Pirates / criminals compared to al-Qaeda:

You see, you have to realize that al-Qaeda isn’t criminal. 9/11 was a deed of moral retaliation. There was no money or ransom for profit to be had for 9/11, other than simple fairness towards Muslim interests that can better Muslims countries as a whole. Now, it makes sense why al-Qaeda would support piracy against the U.S., but more for revenge and their method of moral teaching, not so much for the profit involved. Therefore, since objectives differ, chances are al-Qaeda will want the pirates to kill the hostages and sink the ship once ransom is paid, where the pirates won’t want to do it that way, to maintain integrity.

Now, I’m not saying al-Qaeda is justified in their evil, I’m just saying that they just have the same mindset as Hannity. The only difference is that they are on a different side.

April Fools’ Day:

It’s now April 15th: Tax day. Everyone’s a “fool” to pay the government money, instead of telling the government that they can just print up free money to accomplish the same thing, and to tweak it even better.

Lean your head upside-down, put it in your nose and swish it around:

You know, what I’m hearing in these conservative tax-day “Tea Parties” is the same kind of stress for rights and basic moral complaints, that I heard from the demonstrating hippies back in the ‘60s. Sounds like maybe the tables have really turned. It’s just that today they have more expensive “threads.” There was even “a” loud crazy long-haired guy with a screamin’ guitar (Ted Nugent played). He even played the Star Spangled Banner in the same modified way that Jimi Hendrix played it in antiwar protest at Woodstock. I remember in the summer of 1970, a friend of mine playing the same Hendrix version on his guitar, and his mother came in and demanded he stop disgracing that song. Ted also played it when I saw him with Grand Funk in August 2002 and a few other times, so he plays it at all his concerts. What an idiot. Glenn Beck said he’s never seen this kind of thing ever before. Beck asked Cavuto: “Have you ever seen anything like this before?” (regarding the Tea Party demonstrations). Cavuto replied that they’re “begging” Obama to “cool it.” (He left out the “, man!” part. Of course today it’d be “, man and woman!”) Then Beck starting interviewing some lady, and something was wrong with the microphone because you couldn’t hear her very well (over all the background noise). – Remember Forrest Gump? I’d check the next time and make sure someone’s not pulling the plugs behind the stage… , man and woman! I’ve got it recorded. I’ll play it back for you sometime… so you can dig it.

There was even some police brutality:

(The cuffs did mark his wrist pretty good.) Conservative documentary film maker John Ziegler makes his voice known by telling how he escaped from “the fuzz.” See, http://www.breitbart.tv/html/320303.html. Sounds like a Free Speech violation to me. Next year I’ll have to make the scene or experience the happening. Sure, I’ll enjoy being a conservative for a day. Heck, I’ll probably say something that supports their cause better, just to give myself some real challenge to overrule later.

I didn’t hear this, but since the majority of protesters were Pro-Life on the abortion issue, I bet there were a few instances of people yelling “Baby killers!”

♪♫ And it’s five, six, seven, open up the pearly gates: well, there ain’t no time to wonder why – whoopee! – the GOP’s gonna die. ♪♫

Get your new black light poster here:

It’s crazy, man, it’s crazy:

O’Reilly says, “Wow, man, it’s like spinnin’!” It’s “The Yes Spin Zone.”

How to get out of paying taxes in a sneaky / conniving way, but legal:

I think it’s called Code 861. And, if everybody does it, then the government would have to admit it’s printing up free money. Then those who don’t want to work can say: “Hey, what about my free share, that Lewis and Clark said existed in abundance 200 years ago?” (Well, maybe they’ll leave the Lewis and Clark part out.) Then the government will have to give to the poor and decrepit. I don’t know if that’s Obama’s goal, but that’s Jesus’ goal. And, I work for… … Jesus! Many will say: “No, Jesus would think things run best in this country when we maintain dumb lies.” So, if the new President representing the impoverished black community wants to keep the poor and decrepit crawling the rest of their lives, then I’d say that new silver spoon has changed the man of change (who seems to keep lots of things conservative). I think I can add that it’s a not being as smart as me issue. (I’m getting tired of repeating “dumb,” even though it seems all problem solutions logically end with it. Plus, “not being as smart as me” is not as “insulting,” “degrading,” and such a “fueling for hatred.” But, then it’s not as pithy. So, if I make friends with everyone else, O’Reilly’s not going to like me – and I don’t want to lose O’Reilly as a friend. So, “pithy” might win. I don’t want to let you down Bill.)

People are going to say that “paying people who don’t work” is crazy, it’s insane, it’s complete madness! Well, I’ll just refute by saying that I was eaten by a dinosaur the other day, and lived to tell the story. See if you can do that! (It might also happen to Will Ferrell soon.) So, I’m going to just keep talking to the Land of the Lost (unless I don’t survive my next dinosaur attack, or get taken away by those nice young men in their clean white coats, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-ha!). Like I’ve always said, you have to become a victim of it before you can realize the evil of it (re: vegetarianism). So, if you don’t understand it now, don’t worry, you will in the Afterlife.

Government controlled health care:

The problem is that all the doctors, hospitals, etc. have been taking advantage of their trust levels by over billing insurance companies. Therefore, they don’t have a legitimate gripe for the government needing to take it over. When they abuse private enterprise, they justify government take over. (Hope that’s pithy enough and pleased O’Reilly. Not so much that he would agree with the content, but rather if I said it all in few words.)

It’s like when they have you by the balls (like an operation to help fix your prostate problem), then pull you around all over the place (maybe that keeps bleeding to a minimum), then the government needs to regulate it, and if that doesn’t work, then we’re talking forced fairness by the government: “The iron hand,” “communism” for affordable health, so good health won’t only be for the rich. I don’t know how O’Reilly thinks about it, but Hannity and Beck gotta hate it. Their argument would be that smarter people who end up financially more successful deserve better health care when they have the same problem a poor person has. It won’t “eventually” win, but they’re personally making money by telling the worst evil what they want to hear. Apparently Hannity and Beck would fail and become poor people themselves, if they had to get an honest job, where they sided with fairness.

I watch CNN once in a while, but it’s not as much fun to comment to.

Ted Nugent can’t play at Kansas City’s new Sprint Center:

In the venue, they have a lighted banner that reads “PROFANITY, ABUSIVE LANGUAGE OR ANY UNRULY TYPE OF BEHAVIOR SHOULD BE REPORTED.” If they haven’t already heard Ted play, surely the cell phone police will be hauling him out the door.

By the way, I don’t know if Verizon is better in cell phones, but they are in concert venues. The next time someone wants to build an additional full-sized basketball arena, they should find a more congested area to put it, where you have to inhale over a half an hour of other cars exhaust fumes while waiting in line to exit the extra crowed parking garage. Why place it in an open area in the country with outside parking lots when dumb is number one priority? I say, let congested city downtowns more spread out instead of seeing how much you can cram into one place. Plus, the sound is lots better in an out door venue than one where all you hear is the echo off the arena walls.

Republicans are saying that America’s joists are breaking down:

The entire support for this “Tea Party” is to slam Obama for (really) not mentioning that we don’t have to pay back the national dept, and that we don’t need to tax either. So, Obama would save his popularity by divulging my logic. And, make a lot of friends to boot.

Move your wheel up and down:

It’s a sex orgy.

Now you’ve been to one.

“Loafing”:

On the eastern side of Olathe, Kansas, there’s a major arterial called Black Bob Road, which has seen lots of growth lately. – You’re like: “So?” – Well, the name is from the chief of a band of Shawnee Indians. They were famous for “loafing,” as it is written. In 1854 the government allotted them 33,392.87 acres (over 52 square miles) of land in the southeastern part of Johnson County, Kansas, to loaf. Plus, the story also tells that they had lots of spare time to hunt, fish, and traveling around visiting their neighbors, but mostly to loaf. You see, most Shawnee Indians at the time agreed to conform to the white man’s standards of settled farming, but the Black Bob tribe left their land “uncultivated.” That allowed them lots of spare time… to loaf. Definitely not Hannity’s kind of people. The white man had established the “Methodist Manual Labor School” (definitely Hannity’s kind of people), which caused most Shawnee’s to convert to “settled farming” onto the “private ownership of land”; but, the Black Bobs didn’t attend the school, and instead held the reservation lands “in common”… so they could maintain the “traditional custom” which included some heavy and serious “loafing,” as it is written. You can read all about it at my website’s new Black Bob page under God’s Free Food: Evidence (http://www.the-goldenrule.name/Lewis_and_Clark--Gods_Free_Food/Black_Bob.htm). Then search “loafing.” I don’t know if they every watched any sports while loafing, but I’d say that everyday was a weekend to the Black Bob. When the border wars commenced around 1861, the Black Bob moved to Indian Territory (Oklahoma) to loaf. After the war, they returned to find many veterans newly settled on their lands. So came the beginning of the end of the Black Bob. Well, I’m getting tired of writing now, so I think I’ll go down Black Bob Road… and loaf.

I’m back. Well, I got hungry. There was no free food to just grab while I was walking around aimlessly (“rambles” according the written record about the Black Bobs). If Barack Obama gave everyone a free basic needs government allotment check every month, I still couldn’t walk around aimlessly (“rambles”), but I could stay home and be fed. Then, if someone said, “Hey, come here and work for more,” then I’d get to keep the entire “more.” That would “motivate” me to work as much as it does today. When you’re on welfare or unemployment, you know the free money will decrease or entirely end if you get a job. No wonder no one on welfare or unemployment wants to work anymore. You see, just the “idea” of giving up free money just doesn’t sit right with the average person. With my program, you can eat and save it to. Well, you know what I mean. It’s BETTER! How’s that? Just “trust” me! No, that’s definitely not going to work. “Think” about the “logic” of what I’m saying! That’s logically not going to work either. Someone make me into a very influential person! That’d work.

Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ movie:

Jews were shocked how it made them look like the bad guys. Well, that’s the way the Bible says it happened. I think everyone believes so much that Jesus volunteered for the cross so to pay the assured penalty for all our wrongs against others, that they’re shocked to find out the true people who crucified Him. We live in an extremely BSed society (part of the Las Vegas motif I guess). Jesus and his followers entered Jerusalem naked (Matthew 21:6-11, compare Gospel of Thomas 37). He turned the tables of the money changers. He supported John the Baptist. The entire chapter of Matthew 23 is Jesus cussing out the Pharisees (titled “Jesus last sermon”). That’s why he was crucified. How can I be the only one who knows that? Back to the BS reason.

Where would you really want to live: In a land full of BS, where cancer is ten times over the rate it was a hundred years ago, or a non-BS land? I’m not saying there’s a land like that, but what if there was? Well, just “realize” certain things, and it can be here. Yes, I know that those are the things that are “hard” to realize – that’s the rational basis for most all of my arguments (“dumb”). Why should I talk about things that most people can figure out in a one-step thinking process? Realize the motor car can run only because of several thinking steps. So is the same in ethics also. But, ethics always seems to settle at the one-step level because of its strong conflict with the personal wishes of the people in power. Hey, I got it pithy again.

Interesting tidbit:

The original spelling for Kansas was “Canzes” written by a Frenchman named Bourgmont in 1724.

I’ve heard that Obama wants more government and less private enterprise:

Realize, when you make a mistake dealing with the government, you have to pay for that mistake. But, when the government employee makes the mistake, then you have to pay for that mistake also. Since patients mostly pay for doctor’s mistakes, then nothing’s going to seem any different if doctors end up all working for the government. I’m gonna guess that things may work best when the government is the top boss of the project, but hires out to private enterprise; because the government is better at regulating fairness, and private enterprise is better at doing the actual job (in most cases, there are exceptions). In other words, the top decisions made at private enterprise can be very unfair to the consumer, employees, etc.; and, government employees are just one big “coffee break” (that was the name of the horse representing the government in a wooden horse race on a cruise ship once). So, I might have the perfect solution right there. The perfect solution in addition to my free government basic-needs solution also. Neither is communism. I think it just takes a smarter person to be born first, before all the answers can be had. All I’m talking about here is hiring the workers based on competition, experience versus price, etc., just like DOT projects. If another firm proves that they can do the job better, then they use them next year, or after the current job’s done, etc. Plus, if you take all the super rich slobs and make them work, based on how good they do the job, then that would just be more people working with what’s really making America work: more for the harder / less desirable jobs. – That ethic would not disappear. And we can move all the bad things out of products and services. Private enterprise can still compete on its own without the government, but when the government is making washing machines at a lower price that you can by having to add it your executive level profits, you’ll realize that you can make more by working the government contractor job instead of the easy bigwig job of taking all the profits for practically nothing (just because you got lucky). Innovators could instead submit their great ideas to the government, and the ones that get implemented, a “guaranteed” reward can be paid based on how much or how well the new product or improvement is being used. It’d kind of be like the patent system, but can return much more if the government implements it, over struggling to sell it in the many ups and downs and risks of private enterprise. That way we can always have better shoes, e.g., also. Patents today just limit the new idea to the marketing / selling expertise of the inventor, and keeps all his competition making the old worse product, until many years pass. Plus, wouldn’t you rather just buy the best car wax without having to try them all first?

Plus, a person could realistically sue a contractor, even for punitive damages. Every government employee should be an independent contractor, even the President.

I still haven’t heard one good reason why my no taxing idea wouldn’t work, even on Fox News, but:

I’ve thought of “one”: There’s no one smart enough to control it. I mean, I could do it; but, I’m going to die someday. Then what? I mean, no one seems to know when torture is justified; we let pirates go; etc. Without me, how in the world could the government print up their own money without it going out of control? There’s simply no intelligence to know exactly when and where to draw the line. Like how everyone on the abortion line is either at conception or at birth, one extreme or the other, how could any of these people determine when to stop printing up free money, to tax-only revenue? By the way, torture is okay only if it is to stop the hurting of “innocent” people, like antiwar or fair Americans in the U.S., not Americans in, say, Iraq. I don’t care how poor the pirates are, one is never justified in hurting an “innocent” person, like the goods of others on a ship and its crew. If you don’t like your life, then kill yourself. Except in the United States where we have laws against it: an ideology which therefore just justifies pirate attacks. The abortion line should be when the baby’s thoughts should be considered: when their brain starts feeling. I mean a grown cow accomplishes many times more things than even a born infant can, yet we have no problem killing it for food. You have to know what’s precious to protect and what’s not; and, unless you’re the type who’s really “saved” you apparently can’t. Personal cop-out ideals seem to still rule the powers. And, if there’s anyone else who has it all figured out like me, then they sure aren’t being heard in any mainstream media. The only thing I don’t have figured out is whenever humans eventually become electronic or nuclear machines or something, where morals for betterment can change for a different kind of goal. But, when the basic program is less suffering and more happiness, then I have it all figured out.

So, if you’re going to continue taxes and not start giving toward an overall basic needs allotment, then, yes, who is able to know how to control the government printing up free money.

Government basic needs allotment paid to everyone:

Obama’s intelligent advisors are telling him that no one would work. Well, then why do people work today? I mean, if not working and “loafing” is such the goal, then we could just drop a bunch a free food seeds all over the Ozarks then just run around naked eating all that’s free, and building whenever we want with all the free building resources. So, there’s a “drive” in us all for “more.” Again, no one is able to understand my basic-needs program until it’s tried. Like I’ve said, the human mind can’t just figure it out until either someone of influence says it or after it proves itself. But, in high reality thinking, people working in want instead of in need will create a much greater pride in doing whatever they’re working on. That means things will be built better. That means services will be done better. This means that new and better ideas will be thought out and discussed more than today’s strong apathy. Then, that means everyone won’t have to work so many hours, unless they “want to” for “more.” This allows those who were born to loaf to loaf, and those who say greed is best, to excel. What’s wrong with loafing? – Lots of rich people do it all day, and that doesn’t seem to cause any problems.

Obama and his advisors need to realize that they are part of the same element that believes that police should use excessive force in certain cases, showing the criminal that the laws are all bull, and it’s whatever one can get away with. The cops actually beat this fact into them, so they don’t forget it. And, if Obama and his advisors say that they don’t support it, then why are the cops always able to get away with it? I mean, surely each incident gets complained about / reported to police chiefs, higher court authorities, complaint departments, etc. Well, Obama and his advisors are above all those people, aren’t they?

Believe me, anarchy is alive and well in this country as long as authorities say its okay for them to break the rules, but not the criminals. I mean, someone explain to me the difference between cops that beat and tase people in excessive force, especially after the suspect is down, and husbands who beat their wives? (This includes putting the cuffs on too tight.) I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that police, judges, etc. think they’re gods, and therefore know when to break the laws to give that little added “deterrent” for like husbands to not beat their wives (same kind of crime). Someone explain to me the fairness difference between a smaller women being beaten by a large man, and five cops on top of anyone? The answer is, the cops are much worse, because their jobs are to be examples of how to respect the laws. They’re being paid to be that way. I mean, why do cops have the right to even lose control and blow up over a disrespectful criminal, and not a husband who loses control over his lying, game playing, and/or two-timing wife? I’m sure I’d get a few extra clubs to the head if I committed a crime right now, with my “disrespectful” (factual) attitude. Plus, when the truth of everything comes down the pike, the cruel husband can tell God that it was the churches’ Antichrist marriage standard that was the real cause of his problem, where I don’t see how the church can be blamed for the sins of cops and courts. Well I take that back: I forgot about “faith alone.”

White House simulates 9/11 attack:

Scared the bejeebers out of everyone, as the planes neared lower Manhattan. It’s a typical case of They know it’s just friendly planes, therefore they “assume” everyone else knows it’s friendly planes. I become victim of this kind of dumbness all the time. I’ve even done it myself, not knowing that the other person doesn’t already know what I know. If I’m not asking people more questions about it, making me look dumber, then I’m either not listening or don’t care. Everyone kind of thinks everyone else knows basically the same that they know, but with all the different TV channels these days, e.g., there’re many things, ethics, and prerequisites some are fully familiar with, which are things that a large amount of the rest of society has never even heard of. It used to only be three channels, therefore you could talk pretty much to anyone about something, knowing they had to be familiar with it also – that they already knew the prerequisite of your reference. It’s difficult for me to understand people when I start having to deal with a new kind of product or service. They’ll “assume” I already know basic knowledge about it when I’m barely to first base. I bet many people are in jail because the cop “assumed” something that the person didn’t really know, which just made the cop angry. Today one has to “assume” that others – even those who look smart – might not know the prerequisite of your next point, which can cause things to be totally misunderstood. That requires more difficult thinking processes, which I’ve found people don’t like to do. “I” probably over-explain things too much, where sometimes I can tell when they look at me like they already know it, and have know it for years, so what kind of idiot am I thinking they don’t already know it. So, it’s not always easy being smart and considerate. News people do seem to be experts in explaining the prerequisites (proving that there’s no excuse for ignoring Amiriyah, slant drilling, etc.), but the common Joe isn’t, unless he’s been in a kind of business having to deal with it all the time. If kids were taught this basic knowledge in something like “school” then they’d be much better prepared for life. It’s something that can be taught. Government officials are so indebted to secrecy, surprise, and always being right, that they think the totally opposite when it comes to how others will react. The Iraq war is a great example. Apparently the Taliban might be another great example if they get a hold of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons. We should have (fully) listened to my advice back in 2001. But, that full advice entailed dropping naked pictures of “real” virgins to be wives for anyone bringing in the head of bin Laden. I still think it would have worked. I knew no one would implement it: I just wanted to tell the best solution then, so I could tell about it now after Bush’s method failed. Eight years later and we still haven’t got bin Laden, and the Taliban is ready to take over Pakistan and their nuclear weapons. So, strict traditional church sexual morals might end up being the cause for the end of the world. I’ll be laughing through eternity anyway.

Of course, O’Reilly would even disagree with me concerning cutting off a head. So, the power of America can cause America to fall like Rome. When you hear about more American aggression, you sleep better; but, when “I” hear about more American aggression, I think about all the future problems we’re going to have to deal with.

And of course, the reason for the government plane secrecy was to lessen the change of someone shooting down the airplane while it was making the photo shoot. The best way to keep the President and others safe is to not let the public know exactly when they’re going to be flying or driving by. I bet if they had told the NYC mayor, Obama, the media, etc. beforehand, they wouldn’t have objected like all those others who were alerted beforehand. It just makes sense that after the event troubled the public, is the only time those would have been aware of the mistake, to have the advantage to insult it, like they would have been smart enough to know beforehand. It’s called taking advantage after the fact for weak self-centered benefits, that the public is too dumb to see. Again, like I’ve always said: People who have been highly educated, who can read, write, and comprehend much faster than normal don’t necessarily have the ability to “reckon” further (without said instruction). I think probably some slow learner, high school drop out, who’s ugly, in prison, and has been abused their entire life: they are the types that could have figured the resulting problem in advance.

Sorry Obama, do you really want me to say it wrong? Do you think that’s the way God would rather I say it? Me making enemies simply because I’m smarter than they are, is absolutely nothing new to me. Having one of those “admit” that that’s the fact, would be something new to me.

Obama’s probably saying that his image is important as to keep him as a respected President because of his much better policies. Well, that’s probably right, but I still know that there’s at least “one” person still living who could do a better job.

Of course, I admit that if someone would have pre-advised me about the Statue of Liberty fly-over, I (and the guy in prison) would have problem said it would make a great picture too. But, I have planes flying low over my house all the time, as I live somewhat close to an airport. If I was the military or the FCC, or even a New York policeman, I’d be more aware that “apparently” they normally don’t allow any flying that close to Manhattan after 9/11. Also not knowing the distance factor of the Statue of Liberty to the 9/11 area would also be something I would need as prerequisite information. With that, I admit, I probably would have still just said “Be careful, some people might think it’s another terrorist attack,” assuming the experts had it all figured. Before the Iraq war I did tell that we will likely have a problem with the Iraqi people if we go in shootin’ and killin’; and an “insurgency” problem is the word I’ve heard ever since; and no one else seemed to know it in advance.

I just heard that Obama fired the guy in charge of the fly-over idea; but again, I seriously doubt Obama would have been any more “pre”-knowledgeable, as the mistake was a technical matter requiring more local (NYC) information, and an apparently very high “further reckoning ability” to boot. The above premise of assuming others already know what you know is still the main cause. I think Obama and other tongue-lasher people don’t even currently realize they wouldn’t have had pre-known it either, based on the ignorance of the said staff dismissal. Sounds like the blame should “more” go to the U.S. military technical experts or especially the FCC, instead of White House “staff” or city police. Still, not so much censure (especially to the point of losing their job), because again, everyone lacks this kind of intelligence to at least some extent. And, the U.S. military and the FCC can simply say that they’re not going to dispute an operation ordered from the White House. And the White House staffer, who probably lived in Washington, can say that he’s not the one to know all the technicalities. So, here, maybe the real blame can go to the President for not creating policy where each entity must openly critique the other. But that would entail not “kissing up,” which we all know is the way everyone involved at the higher ends want it to be. Right? See, sometimes I’m slow, but eventually more accurate.

Some planes in Kansas fly ten feet above the highway. Well, one guy did once, just to apparently bother me. He’d fly right at my car, then pull up right before he hit me. Kidding around, I know, but the problem was, I wasn’t keeping my eyes on the road while he was doing it as my attention was directed making sure he was going to hit me. Surely some kid. Like that foul-mouthed moron atheist I had an email debate with, a couple of years ago. People like that (foul-mouthed) you can pretty well guess to be under 30. Like Ted Nugent who is 60.

“Exists” a natural, healthier and more pleasurable reward:

In addition to causing everyone to care as much for everyone as much as men care for women today, open sex (with diversity) would provide some spine tingling, toe curling euphoria compared to what you’re now feeling with your wife of 10 years.

I’m telling you guys, it’d be better than:

And women would like it the same (once their minds are really free).

All “respectable” women today expect money for sex:

And, most importantly, for the man and themselves to not “admit” that that’s want it’s all about. That’s why men are obligated to pay the woman’s way everywhere. It’s an overall accepted standard whether you’re religious or not. And, those “independent” women who insist to pay their own way, aren’t going to want to have sex, simply because the man hasn’t paid for it. Then, the only way the man can pay for it is doing a really good job of getting down on this knees, and selling his soul to whatever she wants. He’d also better be very good at knowing what she wants, with the correct timing, without her having to ask. Usually this entails him spending all her time for her, and disappearing otherwise. – All just another way of doing the same thing, but without spending money (some women are half-way honest). But, it’s just another example of how well we all lie to ourselves. And, most of all, the guy had better never say that that’s the way it really is (supporting the part about selling his soul). Moreover, most guys, especially guys like O’Reilly, aren’t even allowed to consider what I’m saying as correct.

“You say you’re lookin’ for someone, who’s never weak but always strong: to protect you and defend you, whether you are right or wrong. … Someone to close his eyes for you; someone to close his heart; someone who will die for you and more.” –The Turtles, 1965. Wishful thinking in some forgotten radical days. Only a radical fad for diversity in looks can break it. You say, “It ain’t you, dude!”

http://www.answers.com/Antisexualism, “Antisexualism”:

Antisexualism is a movement against sexual activity of any kind in society. … Some of the arguments for the antisexual position include:

sex can complicate relationships (mine will eliminate this problem)
sexual desire can cause people to place primitive instinct ahead of intellect (not really a problem)
sexual desire can cause people to lie and cheat in the pursuit of sexual relationships (mine will eliminate this problem)
sex can lead to discrimination, based on perceptions of sexual immorality and intolerance of certain sexual preferences (mine will eliminate these problems)

We trust much more than we are able to reason:

Everyone really is (compared to how smart they all think they are), only believing things by “who says it” rather than “what it says.” We only progress by trial and error, and based on the accumulation of what our prior generations have taught us (which is the only thing that separates us from the other animals). The only reason we “reason” better than other animals is simply because we have our communicative language (words) to reason upon. This, however, allows technological progress on one side, but limits our ability to “think outside the box” on the other. Animals can “think outside the box” much better than humans simply because we rely on our embedded communication references so much that the incorrect or corrupt teaching is difficult to “reason” out as false. Animals have very few rules and laws to control their natural thought process, but humans have thousands of limits and restrictions controlling our further reckonings. If we lost our ability to communicate, we would end up as “dumb” as the other animals. Everyone is exactly as their environment has them to be. This is why various cultures and religions are so easy to stereotype in this world. If everyone was a true independent thinker, then Muslims, Catholics, etc. wouldn’t be able to set a standard the MANY will “just” follow. When those few who do start to reason-out exactly right from wrong, and with an “open mind” (not controlled by self interests), then the Goldenrule is always the universal conclusion.

Me looking at most of society is like most of society looking at a bull in a china shop.

What’d the Virgin Mary teach?:

Christ is so much the one to follow that the Catholic Church forsakes Him by over honoring the Virgin Mary. You see, they knew that Christ was not anti-sex, not pro-marriage, and not pro-family. No typical Christian or atheist seems to know this. “Trust” definitely overrules anything else, even if you’re a rebellious atheist. It’s an Apocalyptic level of “dumb.”

Eros and Ethos: A Comparative Study of Catholic, Jewish and Protestant Sex Behavior, Lopez, 1979, p. 16, “Religious Influence on Sex Behavior”:

P. 18:

Eros and Evolution: A Natural Philosophy of Sex, Michod, 1995, p. 4, “Cost of Sex”:

And with God’s free food eliminated, I think the government should be the one who pays the cost to raise our kids. Nothing going to “fit” correctly until they do.

Taliban ready to take over Pakistan’s nuclear weapons:

Well, like I said not too long ago, when Obama became President, that was the best time to show the Taliban that we want to negotiate peace and fairness. Well, I guess Obama didn’t like that idea, justifying that American aggression is never going to end no matter where the Taliban religion goes in the world. We can all agree that the main matter where we disagree with the Taliban is how they treat women with burkas, stonings. And that’s entirely based on their no sex outside of marriage standards. So, I’m probably the only one in the entire world that should talk to them, that has the ability, logic and documentation to get them to change. Just direct them to my website. Jesus was one of their prophets. If they have trouble seeing the forest for the trees, then I can talk to them directly on the phone. The Catholic Church, etc. would just give the Taliban more support for their anti-sex agenda. The Taliban would just tell the Catholic Church that we’re way too lenient. The harsh Taliban treatments are just doing it right if sex outside of marriage is against God. I mean, allowing women’s faces to be seen is logically going to cause men more sexual desire for them. Today’s American half-ass method is just driving O’Reilly and gays crazy. It should be either one extreme or the other: open / free sex; or, cover the faces, stone for any sex out of marriage (or, even just talking about it), cover up, cover up, cover up! Since Freedom is the way of the future (real Freedom, not half-ass freedom), and since honesty is one of God’s main virtues, I vote for my open / free / honest sex agenda (“honest” in nothing being hidden). But, since no one is really able to think outside the box, Americans would vote for continuing the half-ass method, and the Taliban would all vote for harsh punishments. So, I’m definitely outnumbered either way. However, according to the reality of documentations I’ve collected and translated, there’s is one person that’s on my side: Jesus. If somehow today’s prostitutes could charge a heck of a lot more, then maybe the rich – who control what today’s Christian leaders say – would see that open / free sex would be their only way to get it. That’s the only way I could see it happening, because anyone visiting my website is still not going to believe it, simply because it revealing too big of a corruption, and they’re minds simply cannot believe that such could exist unless it comes for the mainstream church. Again, it has to come from someone of high influence, for the human mind to be able to see what’s right in front of their face. We are just another dumb animal with high communication / brainwash skills.

Against the demons, “the water burns!” But, with the Catholic Church, “the logic burns!”

What’s worse (and very likely the cause of 9/11 and the entire Taliban problem):

I heard Dr. Jack Graham on the religious radio the other day, tell how God really, really wants us to follow the Ten Commandments, extending “adultery” to (falsely) include all sex outside of marriage, looking at porn, etc.; but, he overruled it all by actually saying that you can break every one of the Ten Commandments as long as you “believe” that there’s a God and that Jesus Christ is the only way to circumvent assured Fair Afterlife Punishment Which is saying that all Goldenrule atheist are going to Hell for eternity, even if they never break a law of God (act the way God wants them to act); and, that all you have to do to justify any wrong is to “believe” in the cop-out. Again, there is no better definition of the Antichrist than the Protestant Church, especially when they try to totally contradictorily say that’s not the way they believe, just to fool the moral few. Now, some Christians will question the sin-override by not doing small wrongs against others, but will use this to justify any large / important wrongs that they need to do against others; again, for large / important self-centered advantages. The “line” is probably easy to stereotype. I know none of you think it’s really that big of a problem, but it is what makes the really big decisions in business, government and the media in the county.

Later Hank Hanegraaff told, and I agree, how atheists become atheists because they don’t want to have to obey any law of God. I can’t believe that I’m the only Christian who can see how what Dr. Jack Graham said earlier, also allows Christians to disobey any law of God also. Except of course, in “believing” that cop-out. I can’t be the only one who can see the real Antichrist (the Protestant main tenet of “faith alone.”) You don’t think it’s a huge issue, but it is. Tell me how I’m wrong? I mean, explain to me how it’s not “pathetic” how dumb everyone really is? And, if you are “able” to understand how “dumb” you’ve been on this subject, don’t you think there could be other subjects that you’re dumb about?

I think artificial salvation cop-outs are worse then dumb sexual morals. So, if the Taliban ends up taking over the world, while still retaining their stiff anti-sex penalties, then the world could end up treating each other “better.”

I’m angry and planning to kill the Queen!

Oh boy, all the automated email surveillance buzzers are going off all over Washington DC right now, and in overtime mode in England. Of course I’m talking about the ants which have located my peppermints. So, I mixed up a concoction of strawberry jam, cat food, and boric acid. They’re supposed to take it to her to eat. Hasn’t worked yet. Anybody got another idea?

(I’ll probably now end up on the U.K.’s list of banned Americans.)

Drew Peterson arrested & transported to courtroom with arms and legs shackled:

I’m thinking: “That’s a cop! – I can’t believe it!” It’s kind of funny this is happening under the new Obama administration. I don’t think Obama had anything to do with it, but I am seeing some positive “change” occurring regardless. Well, Drew’s freedom is apparently now over, because self-pride – in this case, of the prosecuting authorities – has priority over favoritism of a fellow officer. It’s the high press coverage that’s caused this, but I don’t sense Drew getting off like Officer John Cheek did it Kansas. It could be though: It could be just a big show for the media, just so to settle the case with a light sentence. We’ll find out. Maybe the arms and legs shackled is even just part of the show for the media. If authorities don’t already have this “show” as part of their current plan, then I’d say Drew could spend the rest of his life if prison. That would send a stern message to other police. Police might start demanding higher pay if they have to continue doing their job without their extra fun and fringe benefits. Again, authorities have already pre-determined what they’re going to do with Drew, and that is the way it will end regardless of Drew’s moronic behavior, which is even insulting the arresting officers (library books, etc.). If Drew gets off, Geraldo, O’Reilly, etc. will get fumed, but no one of authority will get “fired”… like that (real) judge in Iraq that planned to acquit Saddam Hussein. It’s funny how George W. Bush actually thought that the American way of having a “real” judge “determine” the fate of Saddam Hussein, but had to learn the hard way that if George wants to get it the way he wants, he has to resort to the “dictator” kind of method (and a “corrupt” dictator method to boot) – but still “just say” it’s the “honest” and/or “freedom” way, and Fox News will “just” believe him. “ ”! Another great example for the Iraq people to fully understand what America is really all about. Again, America is just like Las Vegas in appearance, but VERY corrupt, VERY dumb, VERY dishonest, VERY bias, and VERY unfair underneath all that glitter. Evidence is still our many ghettos and high prison populations. High prison populations don’t indicate that our authorities are doing their job to combat crime, it means something’s still wrong with the way the system works that’s causing all the crime, corruption, favoritism, etc.

And, a country that has a poor population for unfortunate reasons, versus a country that has a poor population because of dishonesty, corruption, unfairness, etc. makes a BIG difference in God’s Fair Afterlife Judgment. But then, no one worries about that, because they’re either atheists or have church cop-outs. – Probably to the point where you’re all laughing at me.

And, getting “fired” is usually always the worst thing a corrupt / criminal authority has to worry about, not “criminal” charges, and probably never “a fair sentence.”

I’m past due to visit Las Vegas. Not because I gamble: because I enjoy all the glitter.

Of course, authorities can tell the other police officers in this country that the only reason they nailed Drew was because of his inconsiderate attitude toward his fellow officers. That’s probably the real reason most people are in prison anyway. Then all police will know they’re safe as long as they don’t verbally disrespect their own when something comes up. Reasons for “war” have proven that emotions always overrule logic and fairness. So, you can’t tell me it’s not the same in our internal justice system.

Or, they can tell other police officers that it’s okay for them to kill one wife, but they are going to draw the line at two.

Not you, but “I” ran chicken:

When the cops arrest someone for something they said they did, we believe the cop. And, when the accused won’t admit to the crime / wrong, then he’s the worst of the worst and is therefore further stricken with maximum penalties, etc. But when Roxana Saberi gets arrested in Iran for spying, not only her but her country says she didn’t do it. Well, war is based on nothing but a game. If you don’t know that, then you’re… dumb. Iraq, though, looks like they are trying to make peace. That tells me we could all get along. That tells Hannity they have weakened and should be invaded now!

"Tow the line":

Looking for the definition, I keyed in the above at Google Search, and the first linked result title said: "TOE the Line," NOT "TOW the Line". Well, a normal person would be offended for being made to feel stupid, and would strongly desire to never read one of their [emails] again; but, I actually appreciated the quick correction. You too, could love my emails and website, if all you “stupid” people out there were “open minded” enough to consider “constructive criticism.” That definitely takes the superior ability to be able to think outside the box. Again, people don’t understand how I can be so insulting with a website called “the Goldenrule.” They’re all “smart enough” to know that I am really not practicing what I’m preaching. Hannity would surely call me “a royal hypocrite,” and everyone would agree with him, even liberals! But, since I welcome “constructive criticism,” like where I don’t “just call” people stupid, but I explain why they’re stupid, I am “doing unto others and I want them to do to me.” Since I very rarely ever get an explanation how I’m wrong about anything, and never an “intelligent” / “winning” explanation, then I must be doing something right. And, with that, I think I’m pleasing God. And, that’s all I really care about. Like this human could really care less if we bomb the hell out of Iran, eat meat, etc.: I’m just telling you what’s real from God’s point of view. This possibly is the first time in history that anyone has done this. Well, coupled with a whole lot of smarts. Preaching but not really caring (another kind of “hypocracy”) is the ONLY way to do it correctly, because my explanations would be very limited if I only preached about what I “personally” cared about. VERY limited! But, that is the way all of you have been taught. Read my Formulas For Truth: Block-Out at http://www.the-goldenrule.name/01-27-98__TRANSLATIONS/01-27-98__13_Formulas_For_Truth.htm#Block_out, that I wrote back in 1997. That stuff is WAY above your head. NOBODY, even Christ Himself, appears to have had this one figured out. Likely Christ was addressing a moronic society where His advice was the best at the time, knowing that one will come in the future with no holds bared, just like Jesus said will come.

You never know when you’re going to read something funny:

I’m looking through my Ticketmaster upcoming concerts email, and I see this line called “Glenn Beck’s Common Sense Tour” which gave me a good chuckle. Glenn Beck is a comedy act as far as I’m concerned. And, I can’t believe that many of our top PhD’s and high level executives are watching some of the idiotic bits I see on Hannity now-a-days. Maybe Fox News is not so dumb by targeting that low income country music crowd.

The two party system:

Barack Obama needs to realize that he is a goof like everyone else, and that this country does need Fox News to keep him in line, or he will start controlling the Internet, etc. Again, Obama doesn’t already know this unless he’s read all my earlier writings, but the two-(or more)party political system is by far the best thing to have to keep the other party in line. I mean Fox News is right about some points, most are frivolous, but catching that one or two that aren’t during his entire administration can make all the difference in the world. Now if we could only make the public at large smarter about what can and can’t hurt us, then the GOP can spend lots more time searching for valid criticisms instead of things like the Monika Lewinski case. Sure, the John Edwards affair is a tad bit more newsworthy because the wife expressed some negativity; but again, the wives are the only ones (basically) who can become a victim of adultery, not the entire country. Whoever just died in Iraq right now is an issue quadrillions of times more newsworthy and relevant than any victim of adultery.

“But I’ll take my time anywhere! Free to speak my mind anywhere! And I’ll redefine anywhere!” –Metallica, 1992. No one’s going to control Freedom of Speech as long as the media’s (and Metallica’s) around. If the government starts a serious campaign to limit Freedom of Speech in this country, O’Reilly, Hannity, and all the Far Left bloggers will team up against it. I know authorities hate the First Amendment more than any other law, but fat chance in rescinding it. They’ll just have to continue to beat and throw the book at those they have arrested, and search in constant surveillance for more incriminating evidence against people like me. They know that I’m not going to do anything to hurt anyone, they’re just wasting the taxpayers’ money listening to me hoping I’ll say something incriminating that they can spin to their wants, just for their weak bias selfish satisfaction: the game: most know nothing else.

Prisoner abuse photos:

Obama suppressing the release of military prisoner “abuse” photographs is like suppressing the video of Oakland police beating a black man in obvious excess. Well, it might cause a riot against the Oakland police! It’s like Obama would have the right to confiscate that video before the guy got it to the press. And, with some added authorized force (and, in excess if they resist) in that confiscation. This is America, the people will demand all truths revealed. Obama’s learning.

Also of course, Obama’s not going to understand it unless I say the Chicago police ….

According to Brad Pitt (his latest movie), showing cruel torture is what we want the Germany to know. But, today, the BIG BS is that we went into Iraq for the benefit of the Iraqi people. It was even the reason we hung Saddam Hussein. It’s good that this BS is revealed as BS more than not. If the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve a good ass kickin’ then so be it. How else will we learn? Boy, I tell you, if America’s left and right were more geographically separated, there’d be one [heck] of a war. I mean, we can let me explain it, or we can take a further lickin’ in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Campaigning with antiwar rhetoric, it didn’t take long for Obama to “change.” I said this could happen.

Of course, abusive torture is nothing compared to the Iraqis we killed. So, concerning the Afterlife, many better pray that Jesus wasn’t right. And, becoming an atheist based on the mistake theory, isn’t going to get you out of it either. Even if the math allowed for the mistake theory, I’ve even explained how the Afterlife can simply come via future technology, so I’d heed the warning of Jesus.

Today, we can still do the Iraqi people good by pulling out and giving restitution via checks in the mail. Then, if we want the Iraqi people to have it so good, then we can add billions of additional dollars. Or, we can go back to February of 1998 and give it to them then; showing our goodwill and true intentions by first dropping our economic sanctions. The only reason we don’t have these things solved is because BS is something the American public will believe. But, you have to release the photos if the press has already informed the people about it.

Many people don’t know how important Freedom of Speech / Information and Justice is, over favoritism and the game. Releasing these photos is what the troops are supposedly dying for (“Freedom”). It’s so important and well accepted that Hannity constantly uses it in lie to justify just about any war (“Freedom”). He couldn’t do that if it was that important and precious. We really live in an age where issues are better distinguishing right from wrong, and exposing those who are the real evil (and there are a lot of ‘em). Most will claim ignorance in the Afterlife. Hannity types can’t because they know their true goals.

If the truth burns, then our troops “deserve” their added problems. Those who disagree are an insult to “justice.” The ills of favoritism become exposed here. O’Reilly is very strict when it comes to any old American who commits a crime, but if someone in the military does, then out comes O’Reilly’s true colors, proving how his judgments aren’t worth diddly. It even shows how O’Reilly isn’t even siding for the American people, his priority is being a warmonger. Him and his types just lie when they say they support war for the betterment of America to fool people into allowing them their game. They also make this clear when they use the word “win” a lot. If the troops don’t want to be in more of harms way, then they shouldn’t do the crime. WE WILL NEVER LEARN OTHERWISE! – Proof is this latest Obama decision.

A “memo” tells a lot, but a photo tells a lot more in the dumb emotional human mind, therefore has more power in ending future atrocities. I mean, we’ve learned a little with this Iraq war debacle, but we haven’t learned enough.

Obama wants to forgive our military and our Iraq invasion because he wants some reciprocity. Obama wants to protect the guilty because of reciprocity. Thank God for people like me who can speak freely, or things will never get better.

If I robbed a bank, I’d like it if Obama covered-up all the evidence. Then I’d not only not go to jail, but I’d get to keep the dough, and actually have an incentive to do it again. The next guy charged with any crime should argue that point. If he was a U.S. soldier, he’d probably win his point.

As many should remember, I started this emailing with photos of our atrocities (see my 03-21-06 page). So I support the “showing” of truth in war and justice. Anything else is evil favoritism, and will cause atrocities and war crimes to continue, even though everyone thinks it won’t. Again, “dumb” rules much more than “dumb” thinks. You say that our military courts have all the evidence they need to “properly” judge the matter. Well, if you believe that’s going to bring justice, then that just proves how “dumb” you really are. We should make it clear when we publish the photos, that we detail our resulting punishments against those individuals responsible. Then allow the Freedom in those pertinent countries their judgments as well. Putting the wrongdoers to the juries of the people of Iraq and Afghanistan would be a great example of the Freedom and Fairness we are trying so hard to BS them all with. So, it ain’t gonna happen.

O’Reilly puts down Bruce Springsteen for talking bad about America:

I don’t know what it was about, but O’Reilly reminded Bruce about all the things that America has done for him. Unable to think other than extremes, O’Reilly needs to learn that when someone is trying to correct the particular problems with America, then the American way allows for it via the First Amendment. When Merle Haggard and others say that complainers like Bruce can “just get out [of the country] if you don’t like it!” then I say Merle Haggard and those can “get out if you don’t like people who submit ideas / criticism for improvement.” If you don’t like Freedom of Speech and the right to express “grievances,” then move to Iran, China or wherever Freedom is suppressed.

Plural marriage:

O’Reilly informs me about “triad marriage,” where three (3) people together are now demanding legal marriage. You know, I bet all this is leading to open / free sex. It’s all going too fast. That’s right, the church should first admit the truth about the sexual teachings of Christ, or just more and more people will move away from Christ.

Yep, everyone’s moving away from Christ:

O’Reilly said “Christian Children’s Fund” (an organization I’ve given to) is changing its name removing the “Christian” part.

O’Reilly “spins” well, finding a bad picture of actress/comic Janeane Garofalo to call her ugly:

Well, she put him down after Fox News told her to do as he says. O’Reilly will probably show a picture of doggy poo to insult my Freedom of Speech, someday.

I don’t know if I’d agree with her, but if “unconstructive” insults are the best he can spin, then maybe she won her point. (O’Reilly’s rich and I’m about to go broke with my “constructive” criticism. If that’s the way everyone wants it, then don’t complain about the next blunder.)

I’d do her:

I don’t think it’s so much that Republicans are prejudice against blacks as much as they just desire unfairness for the poor and needy: for every extra penny to go into their pockets instead. Blacks just happen to have a large poor and needy population, therefore fall into that category. I question if Obama is really going to do anything about that. I see my government “basic needs” plan as the only way to help the poor and needy blacks. If nothing really changes by the end of his term(s), then I guess he will be remembered as the first “half-white” President.

Hey O’Reilly, the next day (5-12-09) Glenn Beck stole your previous rational insight about gay marriage leading to plural marriage. He made it sound like he was the one who thought of it. Are you going to let him take the credit for your idea? I mean, you (O’Reilly) being able to figure that out is something few others could. I wouldn’t let Glenn take away your superiority.

“You’ve got to fight! for your right! to get a bubble”:

–Sometimes them darn public soap dispensers are slow.

I found a “victim” concerning abortions of an embryo:

I’m talking about some real pain and sorrow. The (would be) grandmother. I know a woman who was very upset that her daughter had an abortion. Usually I tell that abortion should end when the fetus starts feeling anything. But, now there’re two “lines” I preach: (1) Conception: Not hurting the baby yet, but can bring sadness and heartbreak to the grandmother (and, maybe the mother or father); (2) Whenever the baby starts experiencing suffering and desires. That’s the bigger line. If no grandmother is harmed during the making of this stem cell experiment, then it’s not a problem. Actually, daughters can do lots of things to upset their parents. So, I guess we still have to give predominance to the embryo’s mother; but, not over the “feelings” of her unborn baby. Where should that line be? It’s like when the unborn starts having feelings, numbskulls!

Fast or slow: What’s best?:

Generic: Quick senses / fast readers / fast thinkers impress themselves with how fast they can reach a conclusion. With their strong pride, they don’t even want to reconsider, as they will be doubting / insulting their own level of perfection. And, ESPECIALLY when they verbalize their quick conclusion to others, no way in Heaven are they going to change it! (Unless the proof’s conclusive.) So, you all “need” to realize that all our news commentators, politicians and religious leaders can really be the dumbest of all.

I know you all love me.

A New Testament translation problem (adultery):

Matthew 5:32 (NKJV):

But I say to you that whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual immorality causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.

Well, that doesn’t make much sense: The guy divorces her, and it’s her sin? And the guy she later marries also sins? So, let’s look at the verb forms:

The first “to commit adultery” is in the adultery verb “passive” voice form, meaning “subjected to or affected by the action of” adultery. So, I’d say instead of her committing adultery, the form says she’s the “victim” of adultery. The second “commit adultery” is in the verb voice “depoNent” (middle [mostly] or passive [sometimes]), “third party” form, “middle” meaning the third party person “both performs and is affected by the action represented [the adultery].” So, I’d say he’s also a victim of the adultery. Why the new husband is a victim, I’m not quite sure. Moreover, it is in the Present Tense with the indicative mood, which “represents contemporaneous [‘belonging to the same period of time as another’] action, as opposed to action in the past or future.” So the new husband is the victim of the same adultery that she is victimized by. Possibly because of the scorn of her already being married once before. Maybe guys back then didn’t like taking seconds and were therefore victimized, mainly by others looking down at them.

By the way, “sexual immorality” there is “porn…” (prostitution) in the Greek.

The more correct and verbatim translation should be:

But I say to you, that whoever divorces (puts away) his wife, apart from a matter / motive of prostitution, causes her to become a victim of adultery; and whoever the divorced (put away) one shall marry becomes a victim of the [same] adultery.

I guess English translators can only see “commit adultery” and not realize Jesus was talking about the victimization of adultery, which makes a whole lot more sense.

Nancy Pelosi’s in the doghouse for lying about CIA:

When you lie trying to get out of something, that’s one thing; but, when the lie makes someone else look like a liar, you’re going to get lots of heat. I’ve had to defend myself many times during my life because others simply just wanted to get out of a wrong or embarrassment for the sake of their own personal interest. If you don’t fight these dogs, your reputation will just get worse: if you’re a person who’s always right like me, that usually causes the problem in the first place. I’m pretty well damned enough by all the stuff people probably say behind my back, but if I hear about the lie or exaggeration, then I usually don’t just forget about it.

Angels & Demons, movie:

In Ambiguity it’s saying the church is trying to hide something.

Meeting the criteria:

I know you’re all thinking that there’s no way God would give the correct inspiration or intelligence to some yay-hoo in the middle of a Kansas wheatfield. He would have to come from the Holy Land (duh!). He would have to have all the proper educational credentials. He’d have to have excellent communication skills and a magnificent personality. He’d have to be able to beat anyone in tennis or golf (nobody’s going to listen to a loser). He’d have to be a he (well, half of you think that). But mainly, he would have to tell us what the mainstream wants to hear.

Oh, I almost forgot, he’d have to only support sex in marriage. No other way around that. In other words, he can’t support “evil” (double duh!).

I’m sure Fox News will try to appoint someone for the position, if things like Glenn Beck end up working out – that’ll prove anything’s possible. Maybe it’s already Rick Warren. Regardless, Fox News will eventually contemplate the needed position in a desperate effort to get the old screwed up standards back, while society’s spinning out into orbit. (Sorry, I looked at Rick Warren’s website: “Goldenrule” is not at the top of it.)

Do a one sentence article:

If you want to do an article or interview about me and my points of view, just direct people to my website. Please keep my personal information private, for the several reasons I’ve mentioned in past emails. You certainly can make your comments (good or bad), or you can just direct people to the website without saying anything or very little. Maybe: “New controversial website:” or “See the latest proposition for change:” or “Comment to the latest proposition for change:”, or “New religious point of view:”, or “Here’s an all new religious website, that we definitely don’t support:”, etc. then add the website name at the bottom of this document. O’Reilly could say: “Would someone please go to his new website and tell this latest loon why he’s wrong about all his crazy stuff.”

I have some things better than celebrities:

Since I’m a nobody, I can still sleaze my way into a bar, then slither my way to the top of a stool to ask the bartender for a drink. Then start all kinds of touchy-feely things with some easy looking female, where later either my or her car windows get all steamed up in a dark part of the parking lot. You see, nobody cares about me; but, if I was a celebrity, everyone would be noticing and critiquing my every step. So, I can see why celebrities have to get married.

“I feel like just another spoke in a great big wheel. Like a tiny blade of grass in a great big field … I feel like a number.” –Bob Seger, 1981. That’s fine with me.

Anymore, concerning other people…:

I’m surrounded by this huge cloud of ignorance everywhere I go. I constantly have to be talking to people at their level in my personal life. But not here.

Thinking inside the bun:

They use innocent processed wheat and maybe some sesame seeds, for another cover-up of the truth! I can’t forget about my friends the little animals (and the big dumb ones too). They’ll all be communicating their thanks to me somehow, in the Afterlife. Someone once told me that the animals will know that they didn’t die in vain, when they became food for humans. Then why do people cry wolf? Cause they want to see if you’ll come? I see.

Mr. Critical – I’m telling you all this stuff (and loads of it) because it appears like few to none of you already know it.

TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/