Subject: Can you do this:
… outside your box? You say: “No, we just need to bomb more countries, do what our wives expect, trust our churches more, force the mentally depraved to work, build more prisons, and eat what’s bad for us.” Well, I must say that I do have a very well educated audience.
5-12-08
Hello, hello:
Hello Catholic Church. Your continued support of the lies of our forefathers is causing a whole new generation to turn away from the Church.
The main reason our government, society and the church still support marriage:
It’s because we’re all “dumb”: If mankind, instead, had evolved with effective birth control, where marriage and prostitution would have never become relevant standards, where everyone had thousands of years of open sex, our government, society and the church today would not want to create it. Those who support marriage today just do because they’ve been taught to: they’re far from being able to think outside their box.
“Love and marriage, go together like a horse and carriage”:
“He’s drunk again, it’s time to fight. She must have done something wrong tonight. The living room becomes a boxing ring. It’s time to run when you see him clenching his hands. She’s just a woman. Never Again!” –Nickelback, 2001.
Why does society and the church think this marriage standard lifestyle is the way for the future? “Never Again” is all I can say. That is, once the marriage standard is gone, no one (generations ahead) will want it back.
1996:
In 1996, I notice how everyone’s understanding of right and wrong was based on one of two things: (1) What they’d been taught, and/or (2) what works for their self-centeredness (when they deviate from reason one). But, I decided to take it one step further and look at it from God’s point of view, where right and wrong is based on what works in fairness for the entire world, and to all of God’s creation. But, boy, it sure steps on a lot of people’s toes.
John McCain:
Has anyone bothered to ask John McCain why the terrorists and Iraqis want to hurt us? If his answer would be because we are predominantly not Muslim, or because they don’t like the way we treat ourselves (our “Freedom”) then he’s way out touch with reality, and shouldn’t be President. I mean the U.S. will have a continuous bleak future if we are unable to realize or admit our wrongs and unfairnesses against others, and ignoring fair restitution for same, because I don’t think the day will ever come where the victims of our sins will “just all of a sudden” be okay with it. I mean any country we invade and conquer in the future where fairness is not on our side (especially concerning nuclear weapons), will surely all be as difficult as Iraq or more. Mass genocide was the only way for a total solution by our past rulers who had minds like Bush or McCain. But, today’s fad of ethical pride is not going to allow that to happen. (Ethical pride means we will all say we wish fairness, but few of us will really do it when it’s to our disadvantage. So, there’s much room for improvement, but, yes, things are lots better than millenniums ago.) First base on this problem is getting the correct information relayed to the public, like every time 9/11 is mentioned we should also mention the Amiriyah civilian shelter by giving it “equal time,” to truthfully be “fair and balanced” (pertaining to the real / relevant / biggest problem issues: not just small issues and the giving of opposing political parties equal time). Second base would be analyzing if there’s a possibility that we were / are “unfair” concerning certain issues / actions. Third base would be trying hard to understand the reality and hypocrisy of saying we’re fair when we’re not (on major: altering issues), and trying relentlessly to determine if fairness to others is really what we want. And of course, a Home Run would be the continued reiteration / implementation of the first three bases, where the fair way will always be accomplished. It’d get done if I was in charge. Today’s media isn’t even close.
Who’s Mr. Critical?:
♪♫ Oh, I wish I was an Oscar Meyer weiner. That is what I’d truly like to be. ‘Cause if I were an Oscar Meyer weiner, everyone would be in love with me. ♪♫
We are making some improvements since 1998:
Like we used to “target” civilians, like massively bombing Tokyo’s civilian population, just to show revenge for Pearl Harbor. There was no military gain in bombing cities, like would be the bombing of a weapons plant: only making them hate us more. It was a standard strategy / desire of the past. What won that war was the “real” threat of mass civilian genocide. – Something we hanged Saddam Hussein for (who did it at a tremendously less degree). I think leaders today (both Clinton and Bush) use the “good deed” excuse in the killing of innocent people, now saying that the killing of innocent people is justified for the helping of their other countrymen. “Dumb”: it’s still going to be the biggest problem after major ethical improvements become set in one’s mind. It may take three or four more Presidents before the full correlation sinks in.
Come on Mr. Peabody, quick, try to be smarter and give the right advice:
It’s like this:
We can have others who we get along with, developing WMDs; or, we can have others who we don’t get along with developing WMDs. The choice is yours.
If the media would line up all the innocent civilians we Americans have killed in Iraq, then our public would be more “aware” why there are so many insurgents in Iraq. Knowing we had a very poor and unfair excuse for invading doesn’t seem to be enough. – Enough to possibly change the Presidential party, but not enough to stop it from happening again.
Durn cats:
Quit covering your eyes to reality:
You media people say: We’re not going to give equal-time to the atrocities we’ve done to them, because we’re a “smart” news organization, that doesn’t tell the people what they don’t want to hear. Well, then we haven’t accomplish a thing. You say: We really don’t care, unless they start doing atrocities against us again! So, when that happens, I can remind everyone how our one-sidedness today caused it.
My fantasy:
Let’s pretend that all the people who supported the unfairnesses we have done to other countries were all dead right now. That would be, by far, the best thing to happen to this country, simply because all the power that controls the media would be gone and would therefore not require the need to save face.
Three sides to every story:
“Make love not war sounds so absurd to me. We can’t afford to say these words lightly. Or else our world will truly Rest In Peace.” –John McCain (or maybe it was Extreme, 1992).
Cut out the tommyrot when righting oreilly@foxnews.com.
Tit-for-tat: “Assured” Fair Afterlife Punishment (Matt. 5:22-26):
As we all know, the secular justice system is not perfect, and many people get away with their crimes. (You are extremely out of touch if you don’t realize that.) So when Jesus says “assuredly” Fair Punishment will be completed, He has to be talking about the Afterlife, which he’s famous for telling will occur. Those wishing a cop-out (those doomed) will say “your brother has something against you” cannot be valid for Fair Afterlife Punishment because “your brother” may be angry without a just cause: lots of people have “something against” another – that doesn’t mean it’s legitimate; therefore, not “fair” for Fair Afterlife Punishment. Very true, but since Jesus is writing this, it is assumed to only pertain to valid grievances. And I’m telling you today that a valid grievance is anything you do (not by true accident) that hurts an innocent person. Plus, verse 22 says, “But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.” Again, this is assuming without a “valid” cause, or Jesus wouldn’t be saying it. So Jesus is addressing the wrong of being angry with someone else if they did not hurt them innocently. Like for retribution they did for something you did wrong first to them. “Without a cause” (Strong # 1500) means “Lacking substance or worth” in the Greek. And when you have been treated unfairly or hurt innocently, your grievance definitely merits substance and worth. That’s just logical. But if you’re angry at someone because things just didn’t go your way, or if you’re prejudice, then you lack substance or worth; and, is actually a sin to be angry at them. Lots of people wrong others innocently, then make themselves angry at them just to feel justification. It’s kind of a lie to one’s self in thinking it will fool God. But, if God’s any smarter than… me, then you’re in trouble. Lawyers are the best examples.
Then there are those who sin as a good deed:
Synopsis for the new movie Married Life:
“Harry decides he must kill his wife Pat because he loves her too much to let her suffer when he leaves her.”
Sounds like a Protestant to me. They still worry a little about Fair Afterlife Judgment, so a coping system that arranges words that come out sounding good helps.
Stories Behind Words: The Origins of Histories of 285 English Words, Limburg, 1986, pp. 124-125, “Purgatory”:
According to “Jesus” in Matthew 5:22-26 restitution to the actual victim of your sins is the only way “purgatory can be reduced.” (I am totally aware no one is going to send me any money for talking the truth.)
I don’t want to hear any more about it –
John McCain visits black communities:
I think that’s great. I don’t know if he’s really sincere. The black community doesn’t know if he’s really sincere. But, regardless, it’s a great beginning of a possible new trend.
Miley Cyrus:
FLDS’s Freedom of Religion is taken away, but Vanity Fair is allowed to sexually arouse everyone with a 15-year-old girl. What kind of problems are going to arise when guys start wanting to have sex with them thanks to the tease / enticement / challenge? Later, MSNBC will “have fun” ruining the rest of their lives, while Vanity Fair publishers will be soaking in the profits. Welcome to America!
But what’s the best way to handle sexual “crime” in this country?:
Hey, if you want to know what’s really going on, and where to find it, don’t ask your dumb cousin or O’Reilly, just ask, e.g.:
Roget’s 21st Century Thesaurus in Dictionary Form, 1999, p. 876, “whore | whorehouse”:
I guess that’s all you really need to know when using your very own phone book; for which apparently others are oblivious. Y’all ask for a “happy ending” now.
School bullies:
Parents and authorities can try to stop it; but, the only way to completely stop it is with a valid fear of God: specifically a consistent, none yielding, no copouts, teaching of “FAIR Afterlife Punishment.” Today’s church is doing everything it can to obliterate that fear to help the rich get richer. So try to quit complaining about it and thinking how awful it is, while you are ignoring the root of the problem.
Today’s crackdown on polygamous groups:
Everyone works, and has bosses telling them what to do. Same in polygamy groups. The only ethical problem with polygamy is that many of the wives are not getting laid as much as they would if they were the only wife to a man. That’s the only way they’re really being hurt. But, our society demands that adolescents don’t get laid any all. So this is an oxymoron society we live in today. Warren Jeffs gets to spend the rest of his life in prison, simply because “dumb” so very well controls our society’s thinking; where all would say they certainly are able to think outside the box. Laws that aren’t enforced should be taken off the books; because, it’ll be used against someone who just practices Freedom of Religious Beliefs.
Also, statutory rape using safe-sex should be taken off the books (or a valid defense) because it is not only antiquated by the pill (even conforming to status quo), but because non-safe-sex practices are allowed if it is deemed to be financially advantageous for the taxpayer, e.g., if she’s pregnant, she can get married, so the state won’t have to pay the bill… unless the would-be husband is a bum. But the judge will see that. Fathers also don’t want to pay the bill. So, Warren Jeffs would probably be a free man if instead, hypothetically, he had someone anonymously (really) rape the girl to get her pregnant, so everyone would approve of her marriage. But, since he just expressed his religious belief, he’s nailed for life. When cops enjoy abusing their authority by telling you to not break a law that shouldn’t be a law, they’ll get ya! Cops: pride first; intelligence second. So all these legal technicalities that give the police something to do instead of catching real criminals, should be taken out of the books. O’Reilly’s even a major idiot when it comes to the highest of meritless statutory laws. Basically, if it doesn’t hurt an innocent person, it should be taken out of criminal law.
Open sex:
The New American Desk Encyclopedia, 1997, p. 815, “MARRIAGE”:
The latter is more the reason. And it will fail without a strong societal driven fad for someone who looks different each time. That’s the only way out of the human control prison.
“Oh, they’re such a cute family”:
In today’s society, when someone has a family member, that means they have someone who will stand up for them right or wrong. In an open sex society, we would lose (or lessen) that great advantage.
Your ticket to Hell:
If anyone in the media knows of the government creation or cure suppression of the AIDS virus, but holds back that information from the public, they will get to spend an extra day in Afterlife torment for every day they put it off. And if they die before they’re able to repent, or if someone else tells the news first, they’re going to be spending a great deal more time burning to satisfy all the victims of the disease.
Man, Myth & Magic: The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Mythology, Religion and the Universe, Cavendish, 1995, p. 408, “Christianity | Mercy, Pity, Peace and Love”:
Constantine’s conversion was in 313 AD.
For Five Issues, only one person can have the full truth:
And that has to me alone. Let me explain: (1) If you take out of the world population the number of people who are patriotic right or wrong, I lose a lot of followers. Then (2) if you take out all those who have artificial salvation cop-outs, I lose a great deal more. Then (3) let’s remove those who are either dishonest prostitutes or pussywhipped johns, and I lose tremendously more. Then (4) if you remove those who believe all should work or go hungry, then you take away even more. Then (5) if you remove all those remaining who eat meat, then I’m left with a number that has to be somewhere around zero, or really calculated somewhere in a very distant negative position. Go ahead and mix the order anyway you like; the result comes out the same. So “technically” full truth cannot win in this world, yet I’m going to stress it anyway. And once I’m dead and gone, in calculation, there can never be another person who can bring together once again the five very important issues that mankind is of most error. So, removing my faith, I see the world as doomed; probably destroying itself regarding the first issue above. But, I’ll continue to write as though the Book of Revelation was more allegoric than literal.
DC Madam Deborah Jean Palfrey commits suicide:
Another entire life gone thanks to American selfishness – a country that really thinks it ought to be in charge of the entire world.
The AIDS virus:
Everyone on Fox News is slamming Revered Wright about his accusation of the government created AIDS virus, indicating how absurd that possibility could be, stating how our government even created a “cure” (which is really a very expensive “treatment”); but, I can see E. D. Hill asking in six months or so, with anger: “Why shouldn’t have the government created the AIDS virus, knowing how it did decrease welfare taxes for hard working, honest Americans, to fatherless children?”; while interviewing a “fair and balanced” liberal not explaining the reason correctly. I’m still waiting for a naturally occurring fatal STD to kill out all the spiders around here.
Natural selection versus intelligent design:
I think it’s a combination of both. However, God “designs” / adjusts many things that doesn’t always survive “natural selection.” Especially when you have animals eating other animals (the original sin). And this is why many species have been designed / enhanced for survival. A constant struggle between survival and evil. Today, humans can be told to “do” God’s desire of the Goldenrule, where other animals don’t abide. For many years to come, there will be continued scientific questions if God exists. This is because it’s mandatory that God cannot conclusively reveal himself to humans, as such would deter / end our progress / our “good.” Once humans know God is for real, humans just expect God to get down on His knees for them, because humans will find that they have much more control than God has of this material world. For instance, someday science will notice how gravitons (for lack of a better word) passing through the earth constantly decrease in size as they bombard against and through the larger atomic particles, of which they exert pressure: a constant downward direction we call gravity. That there were times billions of years ago when these gravitons did not decrease in size at certain points (with varying energies from same), which directionally moved the various elements to eventually construct the first cell (via trial and error). Still the scientists will know that it happened but will be unable to explain why this “inconsistent” phenomenon occurred. God, who caused and directed the small deviation didn’t know at the “time” what the results would be (as if He will call it “good” or “bad”) but continued in experimentation until He acquired a desired / progressive result. I think the same phenomena occurred only a few million years ago enhancing our DNA verbal communication skills, thereby creating / modifying humans (from apes). Likely some kind of higher communication skill impressed God, so God (not mistakes or mutations) enhanced that ability to the level we have today. Later, possibly more “artistic” thought manipulations occurred which more resulted in a human desire to kill other humans who looked more apelike / “ugly,” thereby resulting in the quickly changed human appearance we have today, and the marriage / possessive standard, as those more “attractive” were the only ones able to have children. So, not every attempt of God results necessarily in, or completely of, “good.” When God “sees” something becoming advanced or interesting, is when God helps see it along, if materialistically able. Otherwise, by chance, this planet has a tendency of destroying everything. The latest “good” is this Goldenrule, that God has been working on for many millenniums (via prophets), while the “natural selection” of the successful humans has been fighting against it so fiercely. Why the Goldenrule? I guess God noticed thousands of years ago how much better sports teams perform when working together instead of against each other.
All in all, there is a “God” which sees the distance between all matter, or else matter couldn’t exist at all; therefore, “knows” everything we know and a whole lot more, and possesses a “drive” for improvements / diversity; therefore, tries to guide us better, subject to the power of set limitations of “good” materials already set in place (God is not going to drastically change the laws of physics just to give us what we “think” we want. Drastically changing the laws of physics would destroy us all anyway.)
The printing press had both an evolution and intelligent design. The motor car had both an evolution and intelligent guidance. The computer had both an evolution and intelligent guidance (which human greed “natural selection” wants to destroy today). And when we understand the workings of the prerequisites to life, seeing that there’s a bit of intelligence / drive in all matter / rocks, being seen and understood by humans, you need to realize “God” still guided all those sequences / evolutions for the same goal as the Goldenrule guides us today, unless “mistakes” or “natural processes” get their way, e.g., Hannity or O’Reilly, and destroy mankind in an eventual nuclear war (well… at least a few people didn’t have to admit they were wrong, being the only final achievement for mankind).
“Can you remember: remember my name, as I flow through your life.
A thousand oceans I have flown, and cold spirits of ice, all my life: I am the
echo of your past. I am returning the echo of a point in time. Distant faces
shine. A thousand warriors I have known. And laughing as the spirits appear, all
your life: shadows of another day. And if you hear me talking on the wind, you’ve
got to understand, we must remain Perfect Strangers. I know I must remain
inside this silent well of sorrow.” –The Deep Purples, 1984.
Plus, too much conclusive revealing of a perfect, wonderful afterlife Kingdom of Heaven, will cause people to just kill themselves to get there, greatly undermining productively and real world achievement. Conversely, not being able to conclusively reveal the Kingdom of Heaven also disallows God to conclusively reveal Fair Afterlife Punishment, which causes all the sin. But since something is better than nothing, we’ll have to deal with the sin to get the achievements done. “Everyone wants to go to Heaven, but no one wants to die” needs to remain. So tell that one to your atheist skeptics.
And if you’re God and you’re going to reveal your plan to someone, you don’t just give it to someone that will just use it to their selfish advantage. And knowing there will be various translation corruptions, you don’t give reveal your full plan to lots of non-selfish people either, or we’ll end up with so many corrupted points of views that it will all end up as mush. You have to give it to the “one” person who will become the most popular religious figure that will have ever lived during the time of ethical progression (today: slavery abolished, equal rights, etc.): not Moses, not Mohammed, but Jesus Christ. (Christianity still largely has the greatest number of followers.) Attestant to God’s need to not totally reveal Himself was Jesus speaking mostly parabolically; which can all be interpreted in different ways, just like the book of Revelation, or with hidden meanings. Plus, some very relevant subjects were purposely not spoken about, to allow Middle Age corruptors to maintain Christianity. Possibly the intelligence present in all rocks, air, some animals, etc. may know that God exists conclusively, where we are far too greedy and selfish to attain that level of knowledge, especially where we could present that evidence to others.
The main default of human intelligence is how it likes to “rest” its thinking in binary extremes: Like either this or that country in a war can be totally good while the other side is totally evil. They either hate that dress or love that dress, as in women shopping. Like how it’s either “natural selection” or there’s no God, one extreme or the other. It seems neither creationists nor evolutionists can think outside their box / stereotype. “Dumb”: apparently only one human is allowed to change it.
Why do I get the feeling you’re not listening to me?:
How do you spell “binary”:
A lot of honest people who have ever had sex outside of marriage feel a great deal of relief when some PhD evolutionist writes a book concluding that there’s no God.
You see, today’s sexual interest outside of marriage is overwhelmingly felt as evil or “S.I.N”:
The Pitch (free local tabloid), March 27-April 2, 2008, advertisement, p. 53:
Real retributive sin is when someone hurts an “innocent” person: There has to be a “real” victim. Browsing some Internet porn, I noticed that many participants make evil faces, gestures and sounds believing sex is not from God. Folks will say that those participating in Internet porn are evil therefore the gestures; but, the reality is that high libidos, etc. have all been brainwashed in believing that sex outside of marriage, or even exhibited within marriage, is Ungodly. They all “trust” the real evil, who easily equates “filth” and “dirty” with God’s greatest gift to Mankind. “Dumb”: it explains a lot of stuff. The problem escalates when “innocent” high libidos, etc., thinking they are damned by God, start to do “real” sin that hurts “real” innocent people. The sex outside-of-marriage lie of the church and the salvation cop-outs combined probably cause all of the world’s unnecessary problems, that affects everyone!
Let’s go shopping:
“One” price, “one” Word, and “one” way to Heaven.
Mr. Critical – Diligently working on my religious writings:
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/
Your comments are welcome:
I used to only invite constructive criticism, but now I want to hear all your thoughts: I need to hear more proof how dumb you all really are, and what real prerequisites need to be addressed. I need to hear things like how it’s okay to slaughter animals because they don’t have a soul, e.g.