Subject: The Honest Email Letter
May 3, 2007
Yeah… you can all trust whatever I say now. Finally, I’m competing head-to-head with The No Spin Zone:
1) President Bush makes his decisions based on what’s good for the country, not himself.
2) Fox News is fair and balanced.
3) Hannity wants peace.
4) O’Reilly is an illegal alien.
5) Our secular justice system makes all the right decisions.
6) Animals don’t feel pain and suffering the same way humans do.
7) It is better to kill millions of innocent people than one evil leader.
8) God made sex so enjoyable because He doesn’t want us to do it.
9) The boss in the air conditioned office should make more than his employee out digging the ditch.
10) Mr. Critical uses the nice agreeing approach.
You see... I can also be a highly educated person like O’Reilly.
Rudy Giuliani:
Bush jammed the huge elephant so far into the little pickle that the Republicans plan to nominate their best democrat to run against the democrats. This is the first time in my lifetime I’ve seen anything like that.
Mah-ah-ah-ah-ah-ah:
To gloat, I must note I think “I” got his goat, when I wrote more than an iot about the antidote of Jesus’ dote, because it doesn’t get his vote, especially when I quote:
April 5, 2007, one day after my April 4 mailing, O’Reilly blows his top at Geraldo. So bad that Geraldo also finally blew; and, it was shown as news on the next evening’s 6:00 (CT) Fox Report with Shepard Smith (and even the next day, and even on other channels). I remember shortly after I emailed my previous March 8, 2007 document O’Reilly blew in the same manner, to the level of yelling at someone out there in T.V. land named Abraham, who just sent a disagreeing email. O’Reilly deals with opposing opinion all day. And has done it for years. So, I’m wondering if I’m the one who is really getting his goat.
Okay, I should lay off a bit, and instead show a happy face for O’Reilly to see:
Hey, please don’t be a ham when writing oreilly@foxnews.com. It’s just not nice.
Well, I have to admit, I’ll be preparing my next letter or something with O’Reilly on the set, technically ignoring most of it until I start hearing him getting loud. Yeah, it oughta get him higher ratings. We can both agree that would be good. And hey, it’s that kind of yelling that got that Vietnam draft stopped, right before I turned 18. So, we can thank all those hippies, or I might not be sharin’ my thoughts with you fine folks today. So every night before bed, I recite my prayers, which always starts with a “Give me an F.” Plus, I’ve been saving barber expenses, by lettin’ it grow out a little more each time.
You see, the key is to say things that are true in essence. You can blab opposing opinion all day, but it ain’t gonna get achievement until it explains the core truth of the issue. Well, one has to be pretty smart to be able to reckon out something that has never been reckoned out before.
“Now in darkness, world stops turning – ashes were the bodies burning. No more War Pigs have the power: Hand of God has struck the hour. Day of Judgment, God is calling, on their knees the War Pigs crawling. Begging mercies for their sins, Satan, laughing, spreads his wings.” –Ozzy, 1970. However you want to describe it. Compare: “the officer” –Matthew 5:25.
O’Reilly loves the law (“right or wrong”), so don’t get mad, get glad:
After seeing what I did to your License Plate Frame, you can now sue me: According to U.S.C., Chapter 1, §106A, Subsection (a)(3), you “shall have the right… to prevent any intentional distortion, mutilation, or other modification of that work which would be prejudicial to his or her honor or reputation.” So, let me know if I need to get out of town.
Come on… Use your noodle:
Nancy Pelosi visits Syria: I don’t know the details, but any high ranking U.S. politician who completes a friendly visit to a terrorist state, has to help deter other terrorists who wish to attack our mainland, or our presence anywhere. True, it doesn’t help with “winning the game” for immediate ignoring and blackballing satisfactions of our standard, default, emotional animalistic anger (hence, a “felony”); but, to be superior, I should write about what will really deter another attack against us (because I could become a victim). In fact, the most simple, truthful, friendly gesture could totally reverse sentiment instantly. I know it works with angry, aggressive dogs, when you all of a sudden show him you have a bowl of food for him; therefore, it should work identically with humans. E.g., Israel wants the land but are too selfish to just be nice to the Palestinians (I mean real nice / charitable / more than whatever they have done). You see, technically, the terrorists feel justified in attacking America because they emotionally believe that everyone over here is evil and deserving of death. And, many do, but the fact is, if they have “some” kind of factual knowledge that there are some (or, even many) good, honest and fair people here, then their primitive emotions – which George, Bill, Sean, etc. also share – will change. Understand, from their perspective, Americans like O’Reilly, etc. who try to convey that they are good, honest and fair, are not fooling people from other countries near to the extent that they fool the average American. It has to do with all of us wish so much that our own government and media can be trusted, that we will allow ourselves to believe it. Example: Whoever was the liar concerning the Iranian illegal waters captives issue, will surely stay in office. That’s because we the people wish so much, and “need” honest information so much that we will fool ourselves in thinking “it has to be” so. And will act based on that information (hence, the Iraqi war). If my voice was popular from 1998 and on, instead of such a dumb and one-sided media, we would be living in a state of mutually gainful peace with Iraq, Iran and others. They say it all has to do with who you know in the United States; explaining how it really doesn’t have to do with truth and fairness. Al Gore uses “You ain’t seen nothin’ yet” as another disingenuous political ploy, but I can state the same with realistic probability. There may be many who have made themselves into a better person by reading my stuff, but that’s only good for the individual (and the individuals they deal with), and is not getting presented to the general public. Learning from history, when I die, and my stuff dies, then everyone a hundred years from now will return totally back to default animal emotions. When I read about WWII, all I can brag about is that I just wasn’t there to comment.
http://opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009908 (Wall Street Journal), Did Nancy Pelosi commit a felony when she went to Syria?:
“The Logan Act makes it a felony and provides for a prison sentence of up to three years for any American, ‘without authority of the United States,’ to communicate with a foreign government in an effort to influence that government's behavior on any ‘disputes or controversies with the United States.’”
Well, since the Logan Act prevents me my First Amendment rights to write a letter or cc to a controversial foreign leader, I’d better remove some names from my database. Unless, our government can promise me a computer with Internet access while I’m in prison for three years. I can understand why our government would not want me to rationally explain, while quoting Scripture, to a foreign leader how one is never justified in hurting an innocent person. So instead, I’d like to watch President Bush try to do it. Then he can be the new Al Gore (as defined by Hannity). Maybe I will have to change my citizenship to Mexico, to save the world.
Other than Big Baby reasons, I don’t see why Republicans want to suppress Freedom of Speech. I think it’s always good to keep communication open, no matter how evil the foreign leader. Communication finds solutions and brings out all the facts. – Oh… I see why the Republicans don’t want open communication with terrorist states. I just can’t see how it could be that way if they read the real Bible, instead of just listening to what they want to hear at church.
It’ll all just bounce back:
I still don’t hear those Democrats talking about restitution for the Iraqi people. Yes… we could just like send ‘em a check instead of the forcing them to like us method. You bet it will just go into somebody’s pocket at first: I didn’t say it would be easy. But, eventually it will get to the people. – Well, more people should have listened to me in 1998, so don’t whine. Otherwise, we’ll just have to wait ‘til they get us back. And, surely we can speed that up if we decide to include all Iranians in the mix. Republican thinking says giving all the restitution to one Iraqi leader will be the correct way of doing it, as it will “trickle down” to where it’s needed. – E.g., he’ll create more jobs as he desires more palaces.
The Green Zone by 2010:
Obvious to me: not to you:
I think the right-wing conservatives wish to ignore America’s atrocities and unfairnesses against people of other nations. I think the left-wing liberals and moderates wish to ignore America’s atrocities and unfairnesses against people of other nations. I think right-wing conservatives wish the Iraq war to continue just to save face (and will say it’s escalating because the liberals won’t give the extra funding). I think the left-wing liberals and moderates wish the Iraq war to end because it’s not “win”-able, and they don’t have to save face. I think this continuous pretending that we were / are always in the right is going to just escalate terrorism. In other words, the solution is not more guardings, bombings, or more ignoring, it’s admitting our errors and unfairnesses and making restitutions. I think everyone will continue to ignore my rationale, and will just continue to whine and complain as things get worse in the future; and, most of all, wonder why it went that way. E.g., all our military personnel are very, very smart tactically and strategically, and can outsmart the enemy (“oh boy”) many times over, and can think very logically about who the enemy is; but, none can cipher in their conscience why the enemy is the enemy. And the ludicrous thing is, “the enemy” is of the exact same moral and pride. Yet, each soldier is so dumb that they actually think the enemy is of opposite moral and pride. Now that’s a good example of one extreme or the other. Why is that, O’Reilly?
Proud to be a moron:
If YOU were the average Joe, with the average job, in Iraq during our invasion, and picked up from the rubble that little guy with that same funny looking nose that you have, YOU’D join the local militia too. It would be a grave insult against your dead son if you didn’t. Then you couple that with the unfair, one-sided, selfish-centered WMD reason, coupled with the error of that, coupled with the obvious personal grudge Bush had for Saddam Hussein ….
“I’m educated and proud to serve, sir”:
Animals don’t feel pain and suffering the same way humans do:
That’s because humans are smarter than animals.
He could even beat a polygraph test:
I’m sure a polygraph test would show George not lying when asked if he started and maintains the Iraq war for the American people, not for selfish reasons.
Dear Nancy Pelosi:
What is the big deal with California anyway? E.g., I remember in the early ‘70s, one of my friends ran away from home, grabbed his girlfriend and hitchhiked to California. I heard of others similar. I mean, I don’t remember anyone ever running off to Fort Wayne, Indiana. Why is that?
Any atheists reading?:
Gospel of Thomas, 50: Jesus said … “If they ask you, ‘What is the evidence of your Father in you?’ say to them, ‘It is motion and rest.’”
Jesus is the voice of God.
Church: That literal six-day evolution is turning too many people away from God. I believe in the basic tenet of billions of years of evolution, and believe in God. So, why am I one of the few? Show the atheists that other people existed during Adam and Eve, or Cain and Able could not have acquired wives. Stuff like that should show that favorable futuristic advanced research and findings just antiquate some Hebrew’s misinterpretation and/or aggrandizements of the basic knowledge limitations of the period. E.g., if God said “DNA” six thousand years ago, they wouldn’t have understood a thing about it, unless God added a science course totally above their heads. That’s not the way God communicates. It served the purpose for the time of its telling. Plus, Jesus is supposed to clarify the mess and corruptions (as Jesus stated there was). You just need to get your sex lie unattributed to Jesus. Then things can start falling in place.
The Mighty Antiquator:
Microsoft.
Keep up the good work Fox:
Fox News asked a lot of people “Who won?” concerning the British sailors Iran released. That just shows a truly intelligent person how it’s all a game to conservatives.
There is something enticing, attractive, exciting and sporting about conservatives who are powerful, evil, dishonest, and articulate; but, my job is to show how ugly, dumb and pathetic they really are. I just believe in a different kind of God: Goldenrule versus good for the few.
For sure, but who’s the biggest pimp?:
People who use their high positions to denounce promiscuous women and praise chastity, are the biggest pimps. You see, the more you can cover the human body, the more you can make women say “no,” and the more you can make women think sex is only for the man’s pleasure, the more (other) women can control a man and more get what they want from him. Conversely, if sex is easy for men to obtain, then a man doesn’t have to get down on his knees for a woman as often. Conservatives call that “not having respect for the woman”; but, it is really not having respect for the man. Since I’m an old hippy from the 60s, 70s, 80s, and beyond, I feel that sex is not only for the pleasure of the man, but is also for the pleasure of the woman. Therefore, I have difficulty dating women who have been taught that everything is to be for them (“respect” for the woman), and sex is the only thing for me. Those are not what I call “independent” women, if they have to control a man for whatever reason. A truly “independent” woman has both freed her mind that sex is also for her pleasure, and she is financially free from having to be a church respected dishonest prostitute. I’d love someone trying to explain to me how I’m wrong. Since O’Reilly is definitely a I submit, right or wrong guy, he well concurs with today’s churches’ pimp standards.
“Christians are losing 10% of its faith per year.” –Someone on Fox News, 11-2-06.
“Ho”: “A word Santa Clause says three times when he sees your wife, mother and sister together in the same room.”
For all you church people:
Gospel of Thomas, 97: Jesus said, “The [Father's] kingdom is like a woman who was carrying a [jar] full of meal. While she was walking along [a] distant road, the handle of the jar broke and the meal spilled behind her [along] the road. She didn't know it; she hadn't noticed a problem. When she reached her house, she put the jar down and discovered that it was empty.”
To be dia-critical, O’Reilly is a ῾Ω!
Older reliable programs: have some respect for the rich and make some room for Windows Vista:
…And get that pocket-book back out to spend even more money for the new faddish ways of doing the same old thing you’ve already been doing, and maybe a little less on what you “need” it to do; and, forget about having any more spare time, because you will continually have to be learning the new faddish ways and places of doing what you’ve been accustom to, which is what made computers so popular in the first place. Any customization or programming you needed to add it the past, forget about it, you’ll either have to learn to do without it or hire somebody to do it for you, if it can even still do what it used to. How else can we make it better in the future?
Bill Gates is a good example of a dictator.
If you want to and can make some real improvements, then just make the improvements without destroying everyone’s old programs.
Prejudice: a two-way street:
I think Hannity and other Fox interviewers should explain to the New Black Panther Party leaders how they’re not only prejudice against all whites and are bigots, but the reality is, the intelligence says, not all white people are prejudice against blacks. And, how they should try to find… intelligent solutions. But, that kind of reasoning would sort of additionally enlighten how Fox people are in the outmoded category of the sorts who are still prejudice against blacks. No, Fox people aren’t going to say they’re prejudice, you can just tell.
I’m mailing my resumé to Fox News:
…for the position of being the guy who types in the text scrolling along the bottom of the screen. I bet I can really get things smokin’ while adding my comments, and can make sure things are fair and balanced. If they’d let me run their video paintbrush program, I can draw Hitler’s mustache and/or horns on lots of the guests, etc. I’d just hold down the bleep button throughout the entire O’Reilly Factor. I don’t think that’s being bad if I’m doing it to save the world.
People today could a least try to make themselves look smart:
…Hey, I can look smart:
And, in many ways you are much smarter than those who have been “educated” (brainwashed).
Faith:
I say the most important thing for the betterment of today’s society – which is long lost – is to realize anytime you hurt an innocent person, you will suffer equally in your afterlife (e.g., Matt. 5:23-26). According to the Protestants, conversely, the most important religious thing for the world, is to let everyone know that all their wrongs are forgiven, and they will not suffer in their afterlife for anything, and that only secular justice can and will render all hidden wrongs. So, who’s going to get more exposure, me or the money? And, of course, which teaching is better for the world? I’m trying to make you think.
Virginia Tech shooting:
Like the similar school killings, the shooter simply doesn’t believe in guaranteed afterlife punishment for hurting innocent people, or they flat out wouldn’t do it. Thank you churches. Thank you for your numerous cop-outs. Thank you for moving people away from the church, via denouncing sex. And, most of all, since this relates to a girlfriend / infatuation, thank you for the marriage / one person love standard. This tragedy is just another day in Iraq, thanks to one man’s desire for selfish revenge. Yet, I’m supposed to be nice and agreeing. I’m guessing, if George W. Bush didn’t have his church cop-outs, he’d go insane by now. Smarter and more honest people is the only solution! The pathetic reality is, Billy Graham would, but wouldn’t, say that it is very important that people realize than Jesus paid the penalty on the cross for the shooters’ killings; especially to the victims’ friends and families (the “wouldn’t” part). But, e.g., if you’re a corrupt / embezzling politician, “would.” You’re not going to hear this on CNN, so it’s bound to happen again, and in escalation. – Anyone who wants to go out with a big bang.
The reason Billy Graham is so popular? Because people are “dumb.”
A psychiatrist (or, psychologist [??]) on Fox said “99% of the time this kind of crime is a crime of passion.”
So Cho was firmly against “debauchery” – Well, I’m glad to hear he fits in total opposition to what I say is (basically) best for the future world. O’Reilly and Bush should like him – they helped support Cho’s cause. “Debauchery” is sex with multiple partners, not monogamous sex or abstinence. There’re many vines and attributes of Bacchus in early Christian art (e.g., Tomb of Julii: oldest extant Christian mosaic; Santa Costanza; etc.). So this Cho was pretty status-quo.
http://www.postchronicle.com/news/breakingnews/article_21275450.shtml, Virginia Tech Shooting: Cho Seung-Hui Suicide Note Found:
Police believe the gunman first opened fire at 7.15am in West Ambler Johnston Hall, killing Emily Jane Hilscher, 18. He is said to have been infatuated with her. "The girlfriend cheated on him and he decided to go on a rampage,"
“If I had just one wish; only one demand: I hope he's not like me; I hope he understands … With arms wide open” –Creed, 1999. “Last night I dreamed I died and stood outside those pearly gates. When suddenly I realized there must be some mistake. If they know half the things I've done, they'll never let me in. And then somewhere from the other side I heard these words again. And he said, ‘Let me tell you a secret about a father's love: A secret that my daddy said was just between us.’ He said, ‘Daddies don't just love their children every now and then. It's a love without end, amen. It's a love without end, amen.’” –George Strait, 1990. I guess Cho lucked out. He can now tell God, Creed and George Strait said it was okay and that there will be no penalty. Now, most of you who support unfairness and have hurt many innocent people, are thinking: “Well, I’d better forgive Cho, so I can be forgiven.” The few of you who don’t have many skeletons in the closet, may think different.
It’s interesting living in a time where no one has a correct and stable definition of sin. And today, the church tells the rich what they want to hear so much, that the overwhelming consensus of telling right from wrong is arbitrary. For example, there’s a big difference between sex with multiple partners, adolescent sex, etc. versus things that actually hurt innocent people. I seem to be the only one who sees a MAJOR dumbness problem, of which I don’t see changing soon. And, no one seems to know anything about the degree of the sin: the actually level of innocent suffering caused; e.g., there’s a big difference between some idiot that incorrectly calls someone a “ho,” which the media over-covered, or top-ten Warren Jeffs, versus Cho or the casualties in Iraq. We think the suffering of illegal immigrants is totally acceptable. The illegal immigrant issue is how Jesus said he judges in the actual Bible. But, the rich want to ignore that – so, it’s all arbitrary.
After seeing Cho’s video:
Someone / psychologists should let these irrational anger kooks know that there’s a church in Topeka, Kansas where they will find comfort.
Who’s really more dangerous…:
A psyCHOpathic killer or an American soldier? Well, Cho (the “ho”!) killed 32. But, a soldier willing to just do as he is told can kill millions (of innocents). So is it more evil or more dumb that needs more realistic attention?
Suppressing Cho’s video:
Many just want to drag the video to the Recycle Bin. Well, again, I think more educational exposure on the matter is the better way to keep this stuff from happening again. Most people are unlike me, and just want to stay in their big, dumb, fairytale world, where they don’t want to hear about or see evil things, and want everything to “just” become better, somehow. Strong people like me who can easily handle reality are the only ones who can make a better world. I haven’t been able to see all his video and writings (which might explain all the answers: to keep it from happening again), but so far, I’m guessing he was just putting on a show. A little overly dramatic show I should add. Not happy with the world, he was having some fun while determined to get some sweet revenge (against ?). Classmates’ mockeries could have been the key, then escalating to all people. Did anyone ever just give him a hundred dollar bill for absolutely no reason? That’s because this is far from a true Goldenrule based society. Like the Nancy Pelosi trip, the right kind of gesture can change a person’s entire attitude toward mankind / the world. I personally tested it once (1993) with someone who wanted to be the worst of the worst, and found positive / changing results (and that was done with just a $20 bill). When someone sees that there is at least one person who (really) walks in Jesus’ steps, then it can change their entire perspective on mankind. It’s like opening the drawer and finding at least one pen that still works. I predict future young-’uns will be taught and shown evil people from the past in motion, because it will help them see the true ignorant and filthiness of it all, so to better not become it. Today, everyone wants to teach our kids as many lies as we can. Today, it will supposedly cause copycats; but, only because a true, stable definition of right and wrong has not yet been established, in today’s anything you can get away with society. Since it is legal to kill civilians in war, and there are many unethical legal rip-offs in the business world that our courts don’t want to take away from banks, stock brokers, insurance companies, A T & T, etc., how can anyone (other than me) say Cho was wrong in killing innocents who had never personally wronged him? Hey, don’t you make your point better when you kill everyone in the classroom, and everyone in the North Vietnamese village? Don’t them foreign leaders and non-present former cruel classmates hear the message a little… louder? Hey, I don’t know how it is in, say, South Korea, but it all fits in the rules of the game, as taught in (the real) American society anyway. (Yes, I’m totally aware bank, stock broker, insurance company, A T & T, etc. executives are not even aware of any “unethical” practices, simply because it’s all “legal.”) O’Reilly seemed to get pretty upset over Cho’s video message, maybe he could “understand” it better than most people. Maybe Cho somehow also victimized O’Reilly… in some kind of “loud” way.
All in all:
Contrary to what rich people like to emanate for their own piece of mind and entertainment, this is not a perfect world. It still won’t be even if / when mankind heeds what I teach. And, guys like Cho need to realize we’re all in the same boat, and it has a few leaks in it; so, we can use their help.
Fox speculated that maybe Cho did it because he wasn’t getting laid. Well, he’d be getting laid in an open / free sex society.
We’re píssed about that 1979 hostage situation:
John McCain should tell somebody (maybe himself) to “Lighten up and get a life.” Maybe even “Wouldn’t It Be Nice” to just fly away to “Kokomo” to find some “Fun, Fun, Fun,” and leave the driving to us, instead of trying to “Do It Again”?
People from Iraq and Iran don’t feel pain and suffering the same way Americans do:
That’s because Americans are smarter than Iraqis and Iranians.
It makes sense:
You know, every time we threaten Iran with violence or sanctions, we are creating more and more adamant enemies of the Iranian people. That will cause more insurgency problems if we ever take over the country. Possibly many opposing Iraqis were actually happy when the U.S. took over Baghdad: being continuously threatened, and bombed in 1991 and 1998, surely many felt here’s their chance to get some easy and direct revenge against the mindless, unfair, one-sided aggressors, because they are now easily accessible in their own backyard. “Mindless,” when we have thoroughly threatened and bombed the Iraqi people, then call it Operation Iraqi Freedom. It’s ludicrous. Only suckers who “just” trust “fair and balance” media believe that. Not the Iraqis. And the best we can justify killing the Iraqi people is because of something their leader did back in the 1980s. Two wrongs (of the same kind) don’t make a right, especially if you’re one of the innocent bystanders who gets wronged. Now, the real worst evil in the entire world should only care if we have won “the game” (i.e., won the war).
Some will say, if we lose the war, we will look like the evil. Well, we are the evil, so it is right that we should look that way.
Partial birth abortion stopped:
Hurray! See, after only 34 years, when someone intelligent explains the real reason why our government allows abortion, and slights a President with lots of selfish pride, one can sometimes see some immediate results. If I would have just suggested this nicely, it wouldn’t have happened.
Hey George, a real man can watch all of this:
http://www.meat.org/index-1.asp?c=MYMblogad0407
“Do you know what it feels to be spit on your face and to have trash shoved down your throat? Do you know what it feels like to dig your own grave? Do you know what it feels like to have throat slashed from ear to ear? Do you know what it feels like to be torched alive? Do you know what it feels like to be humiliated and be impaled upon on a cross? And left to bleed to death for your amusement? You have never felt a single ounce of pain your whole life. Did you want to inject as much misery in our lives as you can just because you can?” –Animals.
“Rotten little pig”:
No, I’m not talking about O’Reilly or Hannity. This is Alec Baldwin stuff. Could be, like I explained once before, when one tries to be too good of a person in this evil world, they can see the evil in others better. And, therefore, could easily become angered more than normal. But I don’t think he was out of control. Is that worse or better than telling your kids to “shut up!”? Not me, I told my brat kid: “Say some more!” ‘cause I want him to be a chip off the old block. Now I can’t do nothin’ right. The lesson: The little girl should know her daddy was very angry at her. The conservative media hopes to teach her that that makes her a victim of something very unusual. Which side should she love more?
I think all vegetarian couples going through a hateful divorce should at least try to treat each other like animals.
O’Reilly slams the “dishonest swamp” (the left):
O’Reilly called people “dishonest” who say he called Mexicans “wetbacks”; then shows us how he called Mexicans “wetbacks.” Is O’Reilly going down too fast?
We are the smart human:
It is our job to control the other animals, help them, and protect them; and look at what we have done.
We are articulate:
Hey, O’Reilly’s coming up with all kinds of new words to put me down, near the end of his broadcasts.
Hexadecimally speaking, O’Reilly, why are you such a 1F69?
Hannity, you are and always will be an octal 17511.
To go completely binary, Mr. President, quit being such a 1111101000001.
Mr. Pope, you guys have a bad habit of just being 8033s. Stop it NOW!
Woow!
(It’d probably be easier for ya’all to just punch me out.)
Gospel of Thomas, 19:
Jesus said, “For there are five trees in Paradise for you; they do not change, summer or winter, and their leaves do not fall. Whoever knows them will not taste death.”
My “five” issues.
Gospel of Thomas, 22:
Jesus said to them, “When you make the two into one, and when you make the inner like the outer and the outer like the inner, and the upper like the lower, and when you make male and female into a single one, so that the male will not be male nor the female be female, when you make eyes in place of an eye, a hand in place of a hand, a foot in place of a foot, an image in place of an image, then you will enter [the kingdom].”
Sounds like my all important diversity in looks teaching, with support for bisexuality indicating both sexes will be desired equally (“into a single one”). (Also refer to 39, 106, and 13 – last two sentences.)
Gospel of Thomas, 31:
Jesus said, “No prophet is welcome on his home turf; doctors don't cure those who know them.”
The Goldenrule is not a living prophet; it is like a spirit. A living prophet can be corrupted and will be used as a cop-out.
Gospel of Thomas, 37:
Jesus said, “When you strip without being ashamed, and you take your clothes and put them under your feet like little children and trample them, then [you] will see the son of the living one and you will not be afraid.”
Translation: Let’s all get naked and party! (see also 21)
Gospel of Thomas, 39:
Jesus said, “The Pharisees and the scholars have taken the keys of knowledge and have hidden them. They have not entered nor have they allowed those who want to enter to do so.”
Well, I wonder what that could be.
Gospel of Thomas, 44:
Jesus said, “Whoever blasphemes against the Father will be forgiven, and whoever blasphemes against the son will be forgiven, but whoever blasphemes against the holy spirit will not be forgiven, either on earth or in heaven.”
Technically, you can cuss out God and Jesus all you want (it hurts them not), but you’d better not talk against the Goldenrule.
Gospel of Thomas, 82:
Jesus said, “Whoever is near me is near the fire, and whoever is far from me is far from the (Father's) kingdom.”
If you cannot admit that you will suffer equally for your sins (hurting other innocent people) in your afterlife, then you are far from the Father’s kingdom.
Gospel of Thomas, 105:
Jesus said, “Whoever knows the father and the mother will be called the child of a whore.”
Jesus says marriage makes your mother a ho. (Don’t bust your hand through your screen to grab my neck: Jesus is one who said it.)
Jesus said God will love his lost sheep Hannity and O’Reilly more than other people if they change to the Goldenrule (107).
Every now and then I’ll accidentally mention some of my issues to people I know. – Boy, “dumb” is the best word to describe you all. You definitely all “just trust” influential people to at least some extent.
The Mary Winkler verdict:
Talking about discrimination: The New Black Panther Party should (instead) jump on this issue, because if it was a black male who killed someone, I don’t care how mean the person shot was, he’d get the death penalty or go to prison for life. Coupled with the Bobbitt’s case, now women are pretty much assured that if they are just really angry with their husband, they can pretty much get away with physically hurting or killing him. This verdict encourages me to say that this is another reason now why the imprisoned marriage standard should go. Yes Mr. Critical, but we are a dumb and emotionally driven society, and we’re not going to “just” change. Mary felt obligated to let her husband have sex in her bottom, which she didn’t like. In a free / open sex society, a woman would not “have to” submit to that kind of crάphola. Marriage is like a classroom building with doors chained shut.
Tightening the gun laws:
I think Mary Winkler should have to right to buy a gun at this point. Who knows, she might need it if she decides to get married again. Poor little thing. It’s a mean world out there Mary, you need a good dependable gun to protect yourself.
Constructive criticism versus destructive, or dumb, criticism:
If I call someone a “ho” or a “pimp” then I will explain how it relates to sex for money / conditions, or how one procures, creates and/or maintains such situations. When someone else uses an important explanatory word in a manner just to be unkind to someone who may not really be a, e.g., “pig” (unless it’s the word “goat”) then that’s just non-productive, immature and not for the advancement of mankind (unless it’s against O’Reilly or Hannity). Okay I’ll try it: Hannity, you are the “n” word! O’Reilly, you are a big B.H.! Now… see… did that explain exactly how they can make themselves a better person? Rather, we should all say, e.g., “I am angry at you, because you have done or not done something that either hurts me or my pride. But, the higher my I.Q. is, the quicker I will be able to cool off. Maybe I am so dumb that I must maintain anger because it is the only way to motivate me to think and try to correct the problem. Hey… maybe I can forget the anger and just do the thinking and/or action intending to correct the problem. Oh. Now I am as smart as the people who will graduate first grade in 500 years.” Now, sometimes one has to act angry to get other status-quo idiots motivated. (Maybe Hannity is just a really, really good actor.) Notwithstanding, I raised a “goin’ somewhere” kid with discipline and punishments, but without anger. (But, that was not a grown-up who already knows it all.) The only exception: if you are a married woman, then you can 100% enjoy your animalistic emotions, and vent it all out against your husband. – Who cares about improving the future when you can get full, sweet and fulfilling entertainment today? It must be a nice, satisfying feeling (like an orgasm with another man) to be able to just kill that guy you really, really hate. I think it’s our animalistic instinct method of improving the world that would make it feel so good. But, if you are a male, especially a black male, you’d best reckon other ways to correct the problem(s). If “other” methods or the courts don’t help with the correcting, then have “faith” that the most popular religious figure ever “assured” you He will. You see, if you read something called “the Bible,” Christ was strongly against the wealthy, and for the poor / victims; but today, it’s predominately seen as the other way around; so, I can understand why it may be hard to believe.
Entire ATM machine stolen in Kansas City dislodged via use of Bobcat loader:
I told you Kansas City’s a hillbilly town. Well… that’s usin’ your thinkers boys. Locals ain’t got nothin’ better to do but ponder. Try to keep up California and New York (just the thinkin’ part). I remember a family in Overland Park named Pickens (really), where their Christmas tree was acquired via the old man backing up to the side of the 7‑Eleven, then his boys just threw the tree in the back of the truck and off they went. Maybe the boys are back. California and New York says, “Hey… we’re smart like that too: We’ve revolutionized many products that don’t last near as long as they used to.”
DC Madam to Release Names:
Those wouldn’t have to worry about that kind of stuff in an open / free sex society. In fact, open / free sex is the only sure and guaranteed way to stop prostitution. Opposed to free sex, churches, O’Reilly, etc. who encourage abstinence, guilt and shame, etc. are just going to make prostitution a better and more stable trade. In truth, the Bible condemns “prostitution” not sex out of marriage. I’m telling you, all my stuff fits. But, like I’ve said, today’s church is very dumb and corrupt.
The oldest competition:
The reason honest prostitution (hookers, call girls, street walkers, etc.) is illegal, is because dishonest prostitutes (wives, gold diggers, female dates who don’t pay their part) don’t want the competition. (And, the more “attractive” the woman, the more they can control the man.) And the main part of dishonest prostitution (the non-said exchange of sex for money / conditions) is the condition that the man NEVER insinuate that their relationship is sex for money / conditions. No dishonest prostitute wants to ever think or even suppose the truth, or she’ll sexually cut him off. And today’s pimp church is so strongly influential for dishonest prostitution that honest prostitution is allowed to be secularly illegal. Today, there are lots of women staying single and not even dating, because they can only either be a slut (free) and/or a dishonest prostitute (and they know / feel it, with the advent of “independent” pride). Women are between a rock and a hard place: The church puts them down if they have sex outside of marriage (where they may not like having to lie about), and “independent” pride shuns marriage (because it shows that they aren’t “independent” / fulfilled). The only way a woman can please each facet of society is to not date at all, and just stay home (or, many times, only date other women). And if the Catholic Church gets its way, they won’t even be able to mast☺rbate. But, like the Shakers of Kentucky (who took Matt. 19:10-12; 1Cor 7 literally, along with today’s definition of “fornication”), if all women decided to not have sex outside of marriage, and never married to show independency, then mankind does not continue. So, we all probably hope someone deviates from today’s pressures. Therefore, dishonesty is today’s best policy.
That’s right baby, in today’s society, when your date pays for dinner and a movie (or, today, just for the expensive gas), you’re supposed to return the favor with some sex (sometime, but at your option). But, of course, you already know that, you just don’t want to have it explained to you. Nor does the church want it explained to them. But, be careful, if he outclasses you (if you like him a lot), don’t do it too soon, because I’d say there’s a 50% chance he’ll take the liberty of saying something to make you feel bad and dirty, before he never calls you again.
Many men would proclaim: “You are wrong Mr. Critical: I have a very high libido, and I love my wife not just for sex. I never have a sexual desire for another woman; and, I would have continued to date and marry my wife even if she had informed me on our first date that she was physically unable to have sex.” Well good for you. So, realize, I’m speaking for all the others who don’t have it so lucky. God actually said He gave marriage a try, but now insists we “cut down the fig tree” (Luke 13:6-9). The fig represented the sacred fruit of the goddess Hera / Juno: the goddess of marriage (mainly see Nonae Caprotinae for July 7). The vineyard represents Dionysus / Bacchus (debauchery). Also see 2 Peter 3:8 and get a calculator to see that the mess started with Homo Erectus. The fig is what covered Adam and Eve, Christ cursed it, etc.: all supports what “I” say. And “I” would say that its branches have become tender with duh pill and independent womans. So duh Pope is the dope: I don’t know if they’re aware of this stuff, but I know they sure aren’t commenting about it.
Yes ladies, he’s tall and stands up straight enough to dance… you know, without boppin’ heads:
http://www.hmag.gla.ac.uk/Neil/labwork/Museumlab.htm, Level 1 Earth Sciences: Palaeontology Practical: Hunterian Museum laboratory and displays, “Hominids recent and fossil”:
You are definitely one handsome son of a gun: If that smile doesn’t get’em those big eyes will:
http://vnumet.ifrance.com/mjcperi-smh/Erectus.gif:
All you need is a voice like Barry White and you’ve got it made it the shade with the ladies:
http://www.lyricsondemand.com/b/barrywhitelyrics/imgonnaloveyoujustalittlemorebabylyrics.html:
“It feels
so good
You lying here next to me
Oh, what a groove
You have no idea how it feels”
Getting old?:
You Catholic guys who need Viagra, realize you’re surrounded by a Mass of idiots; instead, try looking at some Internet porn (keep it legal). You might be well surprised with how young you now think you’re not. And, sexual variety is the much healthier / Godly method, over any kind of pill. Remember, you’re only as old as the woman you feel (or look at on the Internet). Let me know if it works or not.
“Alibi Network”:
Now that’s a business that oughta do well in this society. I don’t think a true Christian could get a job there.
It is a two-way street:
When George W. Bush describes the evil of the terrorists, he describes himself very well. Of course he doesn’t care: All he cares about is if he’s fooling people like Hannity and O’Reilly.
Sweet success:
You are now the leader of all of Iraq: ☺. Which means you will soon die a very violent death: ☹.
Ronald Regan said:
“Getting shot hurts.” No, that’s not a stupid statement, that’s letting a lot of people know something they didn’t know. A lot of people also believe that there’s no pain when drowning.
Borat say:
If I katch mighty U.S. warlord Bush masturbating to womans I love, I will force “Right to Exist” laws to live in White House for all Kazakanzans, then I sell him to al-Qaeda for nice profit, and for safety of entire America!
“Don't you love your country?”:
–O’Reilly and others many times ask guests. The guests usually freeze up and try to change the subject or something, because O’Reilly (or others) have outwitted (or, outfoxed) them. But, if I was the guest, I’d simply answer: “Since I’m working for God, who sees and feels equally for the entire world, I am not allowed to only love just ‘my’ country: I must ‘love’ every country in this world, and every person in this world, equally and fairly. Discriminating for the betterment of ones own country is where the root of the war problem lies.” Now, realize if we become smart enough to change and can love all countries, those other countries will still have people like O’Reilly who will continue to biasly love only their country. So, we should either bomb the hell out of their innocent civilians; or, somehow spread my intelligent advice. But, since it seems impossible to spread my intelligent advice, which would need to be stated correctly, then bombing has to be our only other (continuously temporary) solution. There will always be wars as long as there are minds like O’Reilly’s, and, worst of all, as long as there are people that O’Reilly can outwit (or, outfox). Simply put, the O’Reilly’s in this country want to fiercely kill the O’Reilly’s in other countries. I say, if they can’t listen to reason, let them kill each other, as long as they don’t take out any innocent bystanders (which both sides always do). Now, historically, evil has always outwitted (or, outfoxed) dumb. And will continue to do so in the future. So, I’m guessing the only way to beat evil is to have some kind of worldly recognized religion (one-third of the world would be a good start) where the name of the religion is something which more clearly explains to the dumb something that overrule the evil. It would be especially great if it was only one word. That way God could be the one who has the power over the dumb and the evil, to say what needs to be said, and repeated every Sunday. Then when evil starts to say something that contradicts God, then the dumb will have the mental means to fear for their soul enough to be able to question it.
Also, the best weapon to lessen the number of true evil minds:
There are exceptions, but the main pro-war instigators usually stereotype with anti-sex (unacceptance of gays in military is best example, also O’Reilly); therefore, the more we make sex free, open and accepted, the less will exist evil minds who want to stir up wars.
First base:
We’re all dumb animals. And the first thing we need to admit is that we are all dumb animals, and that we don’t know it all. Walking around thinking you know it all, doesn’t promote advanced thinking and quicker solutions.
“Ha-ha, well now, we call this the act of mating. But there are several other very important differences between human beings and animals that you should know about. I'd appreciate your input.” –The Bloodhound Gang, 1999.
http://www.codehot.co.uk/lyrics/mnop/marvingaye/whatsgoingon.htm, Marvin Gaye: What’s Going On (1971):
Mother, mother, there's too
many of you crying
Brother, brother, brother, there's far too many of you dying
You know we've got to find a way
To bring some lovin' here today, hey
Father, father, we don't need to escalate
You see, war is not the answer, for only love can conquer hate
You know we've got to find a way
To bring some lovin' here today, oh
The only “way” is open / free sexual love, via a fad for a variety in appearance (a must). I think it will simply lessen overall greed, and heighten our inner desires to make the world a better place for all. Wouldn’t you be okay right now with a world where everyone and everywhere is well and clean? What would happen if everyone’s desire for that became greater? Today’s Christian leaders wish a better world for all because their libido is less. If we satisfy all the rest of the people, they will come on board also. It’s like, who is more satisfied with their lives, and are freer to think about helping others: one who constantly has to suppress a desire, or one who doesn’t have to constantly suppress a desire? Now, if you’re the exception and are greedy and selfish as can be, but have absolutely no libido, then I’ll be glad to explain the power of the word “fad” or “monkey see, monkey do.”
I’d like to see someone get more motivated and concerned about helping others, or like even make it through college, while someone is standing behind them neverendingly hitting the back of their head with a two-by-four every few minutes. Don’t people have more of a desire to hit, when they are being hit, even when it’s not the same person? (I know that’s an exaggeration, but that’s how you better bring out the point.) Excessive greed does satisfy ones inner pain. Therefore, open / free sex is not only the solution to war, but it is the solution for fair employment, fair justice, motivation, better made products, and all ethical based problems. It’s the only possible key to the Apocalypse (which results in a much better world).
“Hey… Shiny Happy People laughing. Meet me in the crowd. People people, throw your love around. Love me love me. Take it into town: happy happy. Put it in the ground, where the flowers grow. Gold and silver shine. … Everyone around: love them, love them. Put it in your hands: take it take it. There's no time to cry: happy happy. Put it in your heart, where tomorrow shines. Gold and silver shine.” –R.E.M., 1991. I’m telling you, it ain’t gonna happen until we are rid of the marriage standard. This song is Jesus’ kind of love, not today’s churches’ definition of love which is obviously not working, because it cannot “conquer hate.”
“They say in heaven love comes first. We'll make heaven a place on earth” –Belinda Carlisle, 1987. Same.
I tell you, a variety in appearance will be as good as, if not better then the sex life of Hugh Hefner. It must be great having sex with a different beautiful woman every time; but, it’s really the same woman. Get my point?
“Cool as the water melting from the winter snows. You are the island I’ve been looking for. I don’t know where you come from, but I can feel you comin’ on. You’re a storm inside my soul, that’s ragin’ out of control” –REO Speedwagon, 1976.
Mr. Critical – Awe… there’s the best way to portray my talk:
COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
Take notice: In accordance with and pursuant to U.S.C. Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107, any unauthorized duplication, reproduction, forwarding, copying, distributing, republishing, translating, downloading, displaying, posting, faxing, transmitting, broadcasting, uploading, or otherwise incorporating, whether electronically, mechanically, hard copy, soft copy, gummie shaped, or other, for public, private or personal use, of any said or displayed smart information hereinto, by any means, in any form including, but not limited to, photocopying, electronic retrieval systems, microfilming, magnetic digital information storage recording things, scanning, burning to CD, digital video disc rewritables, audiovisual works, motion pictures, musicals, sculptural dioramas, graphical misrepresentations, pictorials, in caricature, phonographics, pornographics, via modification, yelling, transcription, scuttlebutt, or within a letter to your grandmother, in part or in hole, without prior express written consent is strictly O.K. with me.
☺ 2007
-- Home (Index) --