Subject: What do you know about love?
4-29-06
Everybody else seems to be running around trying to solve the immediate problems, but I’m still addressing the root of all these problems.
There seems to be “a fine line” between great men who are honored by many, and the most despicable dirt on the face of this planet: divided only by what side they are on: American soldiers or Iraqi insurgents. The public: more dumb or more evil? It’s kinda like a football game.
I recently heard that Iran exhibited pictures of Palestinian children which were killed by Israelis, to gain Iranian populous support for aggression against Israel. You see, pictures of dead children is the key that would do it. Whereas if they just showed pictures of dead Palestinian soldiers / terrorists, it would not bring near as much emotional support. Therefore, there is valid logic in making sure your military doesn’t kill civilians; otherwise, future retaliation will very likely ensue. In the U.S.’s case in Iraq, we will kill innocent civilians then moronically state that we did it to help the civilians (e.g. from Saddam Hussein), than we “wonder” why they don’t buy it. Ear we more evil or more dumb? Living a big dumb, fairytale, bias life, is apparently what happens when we have it too good. We are actually so dumb that we think we are smart. Since our government knows most all Americans can be easily fooled, they think we can do it to other countries. I know you government and media leaders are saying “no, you’re wrong Mr. Critical: we are not dumb, we just don’t care that much about those civilian deaths, we only care when those insurgents kill American soldiers.” Are they more dumb or more evil?
A death penalty verdict for Moussaoui justifies the death penalty for our boys in Iraq. Ethically there’s no difference for anyone who opposes God and is willing to kill civilians. Moussaoui should have said he’s like a WWII GI: “Name, rank and serial number is all you get. No, I’m not allowed to give the time and location of our next attack.” I don’t think even Adolph Hitler gave the death penalty to American GI’s who stated the same. Didn’t you ever watch Hogan’s Heroes? I think they were “living” in a “prisoner of war” camp? The worst evil in this world is apparently… the Americans, who want to fry Moussaoui (even worst than Hitler). Don’t you hate logic? What Hitler did to the Jews? It wasn’t that long ago when the only good Indian was a dead Indian. Enlighten me with the difference? Especially you Harvard graduates – you’re the most fun to prove wrong.
However, don’t misunderstand: Moussaoui still needs to stay in prison because he plans to kill innocent people. But then so does George W. Bush. It doesn’t take a Harvard graduate to realize that Adolph Hitler would have known that a good place to have valuable operations (e.g., atom bomb research) would be the prisoner of war camps, because he knew Americans would not bomb it. But we will definitely kill Iraqi civilians if we think it’s to our slightest advantage.
If / when Washington DC gets nuked, people will start listening to me then.
What’s “difficult” to understand, when an individual plans to hurt an innocent person, the Golden Rule is allowed to violently stop it: the Golden Rule doesn’t sit back and let it happen. However, Christ correctly advises us to “forgive” simply because we are too stupid to judge correctly – we have way too much unfair bias attached to every case. Someday we’re going to have to forget that we’re all just dumb, bias, self-centered emotional animals with high communication skills. Compared to other animals, we actually have a more limited (further) reckoning ability because of our high communication skills: the communication causes us to trust others more instead of figuring it out for ourselves. The communication allows us to be brainwashed. We excel only because our ancestors are able to communicate their achievements to us better. If we didn’t have our taught prerequisites, the monkeys would be taking care of us, because we rely on trusting the communications of the people we are taught to trust. Communication allows people we look up to, to lie to us better (than other animals), for either their selfishness or mistake. Most animals would be smart enough to know to not run at a machine gun, we are not. Women are just as easily brainwashed, but I’m not going to go there.
The perfect solusion cunserning Iran is tah nut due edd datteee weahemeno forpit cuthrand soptie. Gagerat?
A true Christian will allow the most powerful of the world to rule their country, and allow to be tortured and killed for not killing innocent people (ref. early Christian martyrs). Things are much better for a true Christian in this present country since 1973: the abolishment of the draft. Now, if everyone in the world was a true Christian or not a true coward, we’d all have it made. (Only cowards start / support wars.)
Personally, in this extremely dishonest and ignorant society, I have to constantly ask “why is that” when someone gives me advise or tries to help me. And that irritates a lot of people, because it insults people when you question their knowledge and/or trust. But I’ve actually avoided unnecessary surgeries, and who knows what else.
News people seem to only talk about things that some kind of large group / stereotype will agree with. Going beyond that (like I do) is taboo. I can assume if I went back in time, e.g. 1000 years, I would find people that are just like people today: who “already know it all.” For example, I would become an outcast or even killed for suggesting things like the abolishment of slavery, freedom of speech, etc. Truly advanced commentary is not going to get said in the mainstream. Once someone says something proved later to be wrong, then they will stick to it just to save face. I assume those who kept their mouths shut at the beginning of the Iraqi war are now the one who are allowed to say it was wrong. Whereas, if you verbally supported the invasion of Iraq, now you are the one who has to keep your mouth shut.
I don’t usually insult people of lower intelligence, but you people are very powerful and therefore very dangerous. Therefore, my kind of analysis should be aimed toward where it’s most needed, instead of to the common person. My righteous definitions are intended to be superior to any future classifications of morality. No one will ever surpass my enlightenment. I have reckoned all angles. The only problem, and it’s a big one, it surpasses this generation (what we have been taught / embedded, and are disallowed to consider).
I should know more than anybody, when someone gives constructive criticism to another, advice that will actually make that person’s life better, they will most always despise you for it; because, you have insulted their prideful intelligence. Ignorant self pride seems to be everyone’s number one priority, even over their entire life, and especially over the lives of others. As a result, it is very difficult to make ethical improvements in this world. For example, telling someone they have bad breath will make them dislike you, but eventually they will make the improvement, or at least partly if they don’t even know how to do it correctly. All in all, in this society, there are many improvements that can be made, especially in the ethics department. The basis for true and fitting ethical teaching seems to be available for the taking, so I feel it my obligation to take it.
All churches today preach unsound doctrine: According to “Jesus,” the Golden Rule is the only way for salvation: “eternal life” (Matt. 25:34-46). Jesus Himself makes it clear that any other thoughts for salvation are false cop-outs. John 3:16 states that if you truly “believe” in Jesus, you will “believe” and practice a strong Golden Rule and consider anything else a cop-out, as Jesus explains in Matt. 25:41-46. In other words, you can pray to and thank God daily, go to church and take the eucharist every Sunday, be Baptized, believe your own lies, you can even live in Israel, etc., but Jesus says “assuredly” you will have “everlasting punishment” (Matt. 25:46) if you don’t cover a strong Golden Rule. Matt. 25:45-46 (NKJV): 45“Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” Be thee here warned, the “everlasting punishment” phrase is the most harsh condemnation I can find in the entire Bible. Sounds like those Mexicans crossing our borders are like “the least of these,” as well as our homeless, people who don’t have air conditioners, etc. I know a lot of people in this nation that aren’t going to make it. I’m totally aware that no one of leadership wants to hear this, and that they strongly believe their particular cop-out is their only way. And, since today’s churches cater to the money, that’s what they’re going to continue to hear. I preach the true Gospel, because the cop-outs sicken me: a seeker of truth. I (only) am right with God when I do so. Concerning the “second coming of Christ”: The Pope, Billy Graham, George W. Bush, anyone of high influence could bring Christ back any time they want, by saying what I said above, especially the part about anything else being a cop-out (and, most importantly, saying this in Church every Sunday). Now also realize that Christ could have filled up another Bible with more examples of the Golden Rule, but Matt. 25:24-46 should be enough. So if you’re a welfare law maker or voter who says “no, we’re not going to give society’s outcasts enough money for air conditioning” (which produces future criminals), realize that Christ will also not give you air conditioning through eternity. Now, that is definitely saying something “taboo.”
Churches that actually say the Golden Rule makes no difference, and still call themselves Christian: more dumb or more evil?
Have a nice day,
Mr. Critical – at first: the new man you love to hate; but now, the new man you love to ignore.
-- Home (Index) --