Subject: I submit, right or wrong.
No. Not really. I’m just kidding. But, I had guys like Hannity and O’Reilly happy for a second.
April 4, 2007
“Don’t put your hand in a shark’s mouth”:
Sometimes it’s just nice to hear something on Fox News that everyone can agree with.
Look what the world has become, since we legalized a promising treatment for HIV in 1996:
6th-grade teachers will now have to make their rounds every five minutes. When the little studying 12-year-olds look up at the teacher, he’ll just answer, “Oh, I’m just making sure you two aren’t having sex.” Then while starting to walk away, turn his head back quickly; then, a nod of assurance. If / when they catch them kids doin’ it, the teacher will have to run down the hall crying to the principal: “Two kids are having sex in my classroom! Whaa! Whaa! Whaa! What am I supposed to do?” The principal answers, “Call the media, immediately!” Ring! Ring! The teacher gasping for breath says, “Fox News, there’s two 12-year-olds having sex in my classroom!?! What should we do?” Fox News positively responds: “Quick, set up a T.V. remote in the classroom.” O’Reilly commands, “You kids cut that out right now! Hey, I used to be a school teacher, and what you two are doing angers me more than anything!!” Explaining in an articulate manner, O’Reilly continues: “Drugs and stealing are bad, but this is much worse. Ignore what Reader’s Digest says about the Health Benefits of Sex. You’re both too young to realize how much you’re hurting each other, not to mention the terrible evil of it all! What do you have to say about that Billy?” “Well… I’ve known Hillary since second grade,” replies Billy, “but, when she started to form those two small bumps, I just couldn’t help myself. And, contrarily sir, I’ve heard the younger you start, the better your chances are to become ruler of the world. And, we figure if we start the first minute we can, it will double our chances. Right Hillary?” Hillary utters: “Up and down, left to right, up and down, left to right… Oh Billy… the way you change positions just hits all my spots. I like it that way….” I recommend teachers tell the students ahead of time, that classrooms are for listening to the teacher, and studying. How can a student do that while all that huffin’ and puffin’ is goin’ on?
All you hell bounders (who think you’re going straight to Heaven) need to craft a new fatal STD, or make these HIV treatments not work anymore, if you want to get somewhat of a stable marriage standard back.
Fox News asked if the 12-year-olds were using protection, but the superintendent didn’t know. In my world, the students would have been fully advised of the various kinds of protection beforehand. In not my world, chances are they weren’t using protection. Which is better?
O’Reilly’s a classic:
O’Reilly talked with guests about crime during spring break, like South Padra Island and Florida; but, he seemed most concerned with, and was most appalled by the brief exposures of nudity. Warmongers do stereotype well with sexual suppression. “Make love, not war” does have credence.
One extreme or the other:
…is the easiest way to judge: Historically, you were either ran through with the sword, or treated like family. Today, we’re trying to implement more fair penalties, commensurate to the severity of the crime. However, conservatives, for example, have a tendency to think we should throw the book at anyone who disobeys any rule (unless they’re self, friend or family). Liberals, for example, lean towards opening all the jail doors, because criminals aren’t really all that bad, and most are only in prison because they are themselves victims of an unjust and partial society which led to their crime (which has a lot of credence). But, the best way to determine the penalty is solely based on if they purposely hurt an innocent person – no excuses, no justification – and, to what degree. If two twelve year olds have sex, or it’s Mardi Gras on Padre Island, you need to analyze it all to determine what can and can’t really hurt you. Most only analyze by (1) if they’ve been taught it, and (2) whatever suits their fancy. For example, the only reason lugubrious guys like O’Reilly get so bent out of shape over underage sex, is simply because they don’t like it when people don’t do as they instruct. It’s a pride issue, because the vast majority of Americans don’t really care if college girls flash guys on the beach. – I see it at concerts all the time: nobody, even the security or police, try to put a stop to it. O’Reilly should attend some of our concerts, just to let the police and security know how uncool uncool can really be. I mean, they probably haven’t met anyone who would insist they arrest the flashers, since Archie Bunker. However, O’Reilly’s, et al., basis of argument – if they were smart enough to figure it out – would be if everyone flashed nudity whenever they wanted, and people just started having sex wherever they wanted, the land would turn into chaos, because everyone would also start stealing, assaulting others, etc. also whenever they wanted, thinking there’s no more rules. So, that’s why it is important to have the Catholic Church start being honest about what Christ was really all about concerning sex and marriage. Then we can stabilize a society based on a knowledge of the real problems to better deal with what can and can’t really hurt us. It would probably require hundreds of Einstein’s.
Hey, please don’t be a weisenheimer when writing oreilly@foxnews.cum. It’s just not nice.
Bill O’Reilly.com License Plate Frame:
http://www.billoreilly.com/site/product?pid=18214&dispid=204#:
Correction:
The other night O’Reilly compared the left with the Nazis. No, no, no Bill: I think it’s the conservatives who compare better with the Nazis than the left. I suggest that everyone, even conservatives, try to better find themselves. Possibly conservatives aren’t really proud about what they really are.
For Hannity & O’Reilly:
http://ecmarsh.com/lxx/Exodus/index.htm, “Exodus 23:6-9”:
6 Thou shalt not wrest the sentence of the poor in his judgment. 7 Thou shalt abstain from every unjust thing: thou shalt not slay the innocent and just, and thou shalt not justify the wicked for gifts. 8 And thou shalt not receive gifts; for gifts blind the eyes of the seeing, and corrupt just words. 9 And ye shall not afflict a stranger, for ye know the heart of a stranger; for ye were yourselves strangers in the land of Egypt.
Okay, so much for the sermon, now back to the insults:
The Catholic Key (newspaper), February 23, 2007: (insert:) Blessed Are The Pure in Heart: The Dignity of the Human Person and the Dangers of Pornography, p. 5B, “The Problem of Pornography”:
Boy, that sounds like what the people really want.
Okay… The intelligent fact of the matter is: Men who enjoy looking at naked women, are not abnormal, evil or mentally deranged. Now, the ones who do hurt and rape women are the ones who are abnormal, evil and/or mentally deranged. “If” pornography does cause more rape, hurt, etc., it’s because porn is easy to obtain and an actual woman is (really) not that easy to obtain. If women were as easy to obtain as is porn, then things would not escalate to rape, hurt, etc. Thank you. And, another thought: with today’s STDs, raping a non-promiscuous woman is safer than finding a promiscuous woman. So… exposing cures for STDs would help. (No, I don’t rape women. Or desire to.)
… pp. 7B-8B:
Who says the “image of God” does not include sex? Early Christians stated they were closest to God when they were having sex (see Gnostics, Cathars, 4th century Catholics, etc.). Many places the New Testament refers to God as Song of Solomon love. Treating others as “objects” is a good thing. We have all been “just taught” otherwise. And we are very dumb animals. If everyone can be additionally looked at as a tangible value, then people will like others “more.” It’s like if you have a car that you don’t like, you are apted to get rid of it, or let it go to waste. A car you like, you will treat it well, and give it respect. Loving people just because they are children of God doesn’t really work very well. Well, let’s “just call it” a “mortal sin” just because you are someone many people will trust. A “mortal sin” condemns a person's soul to Hell after death with never a way out. The writer cites no valid Biblical support: only generic verses, and explains some problems arising from porn, which the church is the actual cause of. The Catholics are so stupid they don’t have the slightest idea how much they are harming the world and God, and moving people away from the Goldenrule. “Not to serve but rather to be served”: doesn’t even come close to “reality”: sex is the best “mutual” thing two people can share; unless the woman has been instilled to dislike sex, again, by the Church and/or an ignorant following society. If two rocks by the sea discover mutual pleasure when touching, the motivation to become more will begin to occur (via its underlying God placed drive / intelligence). I know nobody’s going to believe me, but “smarter” people who are fully aware of “reality” is the only solution. So, technically, the world is doomed. Read my 6-9-99 letter for details about the Church’s actual corruption of key Bible words to support their Hell-bound agenda against what Christ spoke about condemning marriage (Matt. 19:10-12; 1Cor. 7:6), and “commanded” Song of Solomon love to do “with one another” (John 13:34). Since most of His disciples were men, it’s direct bisexual love. No where does the Bible state that Jesus’ Song of Solomon (sexual) love does not include Song of Solomon (sexual) love. But, the church “just says it doesn’t” and everyone “just believes / trusts them.” So who may never get out of Hell? Even the suppressed part of the Dead Sea Scrolls talks about it. By the way, a eunuch can still have and enjoy sex (see for example: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16989928&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum).
They can think I’m crazier than hell, but I’m trying to also help them. So, you can’t say I never warned you. They all think their high positions will make it better for them in their afterlives regardless, but it will make it worse.
Bumber sticker:
“Real men hate Jesus.” I don’t think it’s that they hate Jesus so much, I think they just hate today’s anti-sex church.
Proof:
O’Reilly would gain support by saying my mind is in the Land of Oz, or that I’m just crazy. But, I know I’m not, because my neighbor’s dog next door told me so. Also, I may just appear a little different to you earthlings while I’m visiting your planet. You would better understand my stance for the “innocent” bystanders if you’d only realize I’ve been reincarnated from an Iraqi civilian killed during the 2003 invasion I would also like to plug a fabulous flute, drum and tambourine show I attended during the summer of 490 B.C. – I have yet to see a better concert since. So, there is proof that nothing is wrong with me!
Warren Jeffs: Freedom to believe as he wishes, or top-ten hardened criminal?:
I heard Warren Jeffs is still in the clink. How many fathers would demand their pregnant 14- to 16-year-old daughters to marry the dude, even though she might not want to? Especially in the past, and especially by a father of high position or public scrutiny? Oh, I see: that’s another reason why abortion is legal.
More intelligent people who seek fairness should watch Hannity and O’Reilly:
Fox, don’t ever fire these guys, if anything add more; and, try to get back those viewer who don’t want to watch (maybe try… dancing cats?). Because, the best thing for a better future is to let the Devil manifest through guys like Hannity, O’Reilly and President Bush. If the Devil stays hidden, he can come out later and with more destructive power. Let people see the popularity of one-sided unfairness; then they can better see and understand it, to know to avoid it in the future. I think the best thing for the people living a hundred years from now, is to let George W. Bush stay as President for another term or two, just to let this Iraq controversy go into overtime (and whatever other blunders he decides to “accomplish”). That will add longer and more embedded realizations and stabilization to his true sentiment and continuous cop-outs. So, keep up the good work guys: the people of the future need you to get it all out now.
Try to understand, it’s important to see the errors of excessive greed:
“The No Spin Zone”:
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’ve found by experience that those (mechanics, contractors, car dealers, etc.) who go to the extra trouble to inform us how honest they are above everyone else, by voice or by ad, seem to be the ones who can be trusted the least. Why is that?
While we’re forcing them to like us, they’re forcing us to like them:
http://www.pulsetc.com/article.php?sid=1024, Fallujah and the end of the road:
“As Strother Martin says in Hud, “What we have here is a failure to communicate.” We call them civilian contractors. The Iraqis call them mercenaries and armed thugs. Bush says they hate our freedom. The Iraqis say they hate the freedom of Halliburton stealing their oil. They hate the freedom of mercenaries and U. S. soldiers killing Iraqi women and children.
“In reprisal for the murder of the four civilian contractors/mercenaries the United States shelled and bombed Fallujah using internationally banned cluster bombs and killing more than 600 people [example of U.S. definition of freedom]. This was such a horrific atrocity it united the Sunnis and Shi ites in opposition to the U. S. occupation. Shi ite convoys of food and medical supplies drove to Fallujah from Baghdad, even though Shi ites remember Fallujah as the site of the prison that held Shi ites critical of Saddam Hussein’s regime.
“Resistance to U. S. and coalition forces has dramatically intensified [no… I don’t believe it]. Armored Personnel Carriers, helicopters, three Humvees and 10 tanks have been destroyed. The British base in Basrah was shelled. Al-Jazeera TV showed footage of two dead U. S. civilians identified as CIA operatives. A wave of kidnapping has subsided, after clerics condemned the tactic. Seven Halliburton employees are still being held.”
I recommend we turn the clocks back to February 21, 1998 (my computer can do it) and lift those sanctions against the people of Iraq. I don’t know what the hell to do if we can’t turn the clocks back.
Borat say: “I like you! I like you very much! Do you like me?”:
Cavuto had Iraqi guests on that believe Iraq is better off now since our invasion. They spoke pretty good English too. Well… let’s give ‘em that one; however, my question is, if those guests were the innocent people we killed / mutilated, would they believe the same?
Now that I’ve spent $14.99 to get Listen Up, I can hear what you all are saying about me.
Venting:
You are WRONG Mr. Critical: We are NOT bias and unfair, and so stupid we think we are smart!
Iran holds British sailors for illegally being in their waters:
The British state they were NOT in illegal waters. I don’t have a crystal ball: I don’t know who is lying. But, if it is Iran who is lying, then we have just cause to begin massive air strikes immediately upon Iran; kill, maim and destroy the lives of many of their people. But, if it’s the U.K. who’s lying, then we have just cause to begin massive air strikes immediately upon the U.K.; kill, maim and destroy the lives of many of their people. That sounds fair. Of course, let’s get all the old rockers out of the U.K. first: anyone with long hair and/or wrinkles. Also, let’s get “The Angel of Christian Charity” out of Piccadilly.
Make sure the terrorist hear us:
We should make sure the terrorists are aware that the United States people are becoming vastly opposed to the war in Iraq. That could be a good deterrent for terrorists who are planning to strike our mainland again.
Ten-dollar words (http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?testid=13486167666549929287):
Articulates like O’Reilly impress with their obscure vocabulary; so, would it be proper to say בֶּן־כַּלבָּה to a Jew in 1948?
Anna Nicole Smith:
Jury recommends death penalty for John Couey (Jessica Lunsford's killer):
I’d just give him life. Because I’m with the Catholic Church against the death penalty. Why? The Bible says Jesus will kill him in the same manner that he killed, so there’s no need for us to make it more pleasant. Few really know the true and fair Jesus. That’s why we need “faith.” And, in fairness, O’Reilly’s despicable girls flashing those guys on the beach will, commensurately, surely get something nice flashed at them in their afterlives!
Nostradamvs: The New Revelations, John Hogue, 1994, p. 225, “Chapter 15 | A New Religiousness”:
P. 245:
Mine would definitely fit – especially the sexual part – with a major religious change. Boy, if there is anyone who has a better idea / solution, I’d love to debate with them. I would have to argue how mine is entirely based on realism and logic; and, theirs would have to be of the supernatural, myth, or “just how we’ve been taught.” Hey, if God wants to just intervene and defy His laws of physics (the way things really are), then sure, I’ll be glad to step aside. But, unless that happens, I suggest finding a real genius and presenting my case. Even if God can override it, I think God wants my hand to not just pass through a brick wall. I think God expects us to function in a stable based realm based on consistent and predictable laws of physics; not ones that end in null and void. What is the purpose, if the stability of reality / physics is corrupted? What new wonder can God obtain, if He just does it all based on history? How can mathematics or time achieve anything without stability? (Now I’m in the Land of Oz.) Oh yeah, God can still emanate allegoric messages to very few individuals without too much harm. If God didn’t bother to give the right inspiration to Jesus Christ and Nostradamus, then we’d better still listen to logic. And, God can make all hallucinate the River Nile as blood; but, that does not work well, or achieve better results, as it is a lie of reality. Then everybody will just want the cop-out.
Hey!:
“Cars and girls are easy to come by in this day and age … When I was young people spoke of immorality. All the things they said were wrong are what I want to be. … When will it end?” –The Yardbirds, 1966.
While waiting in the dentist’s office, with reminiscent feelings of the old days, away from all of today’s promiscuous lust, opening to the first page of Better Homes and Gardens – something that I thought would be safe and normal – I find three naked women. I just can’t get away from it.
Woman confesses to killing animals:
COLUMBUS, OHIO (MC) -- McLaughlin confessed and told the investigators she may have killed as many as 650 dogs and cats in the past five years.
Everyone agrees, that’s appalling!
“More than 27 billion animals are killed by the meat industry each year.” –PETA. Hey, it’s what’s for dinner.
Let’s see, you take 27,000,000,000 divided by 650 (most everyone will need go out and buy a bigger calculator). That’s about 41,538,461 times more appalling, per year. You see, if it’s something we selfishly want, then that’s what defines what is appalling and what is not. What’s the reason you think you’re a fair and just person: dumb, dumber or 41,538,461 times dumberer?
If you eat meat, you’re counting everything on, that God is an unfair god.
“Hey, Mr. Critical… My boss says you’re Over, under, sideways down, backwards, forwards, square and round. So, there’s my excuse for believing you’re in the Land of Oz.”
Mr. Critical – Sorry, but I’m keeping my ass on that rocky, narrow, but high road to the Goldenrule mine fields of Heaven:
(I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore, dodo’s!)
-- Home (Index) --