Subject: It’s impossible for a “conservative” to be both good and smart
That means all have to be either evil and/or dumb. That means if they are good, they have to be dumb. That means if they are smart, they have to be evil.
3-30-2K9
I am feelin’ good about that statement:
Have we ever helped an economy by taking money from the people, where it wouldn’t increase government spending?:
Again, if the government printing up free money helps the economy initially, why does anyone think we have to someday pay it back? I can see how we might have to lessen the free allotments if things get out of hand, but that would all be part of tweaking everything until we find the optimal variations.
“Yeah, I wish Uncle Sam would give a damn, about the man whose collar’s blue.” –Eric Church, 2005.
Pig stink:
I agree, we don’t need federal funding to fix it. We just need to make a vegetarian law. That’d do it, right? Then them farmers in Iowa can complain about the intense smell of producing ethical food in crops and gardens. Pee-U! I can hear the complaints now: “Oh the horrible smell coming from that rotten apple on the ground! Oh… let’s go back to stocking pigs, please!” (This is an example of a solution that is far beyond the Obama administration. But there is a reason to talk about it now.)
The new thing is not texting but “sexting” (sending nude pictures of oneself):
Teenager Jessie Logan commits suicide as a result, because the picture ended up all over the place. The real killer: the church. Simply because there’s still an overall church adamant teaching stigma of sexual shame, guilt and dishonor, because they refuse to overrule traditional teachings (best reason: to save face). If the grieving mother lived for another thousand years, she’d likely never be able to figure out who really killer her daughter. If she asked her priest or pastor to be frank, they’d say it has to do with the evils of sexuality outside of marriage. See the problem? It takes a two step thinking process to see it. You might have to also understand that we’re going through a sexual transition since the pill, justifying kids’ more open ideals about sex. This same transition is also causing more and more of them to move away from the church. I guess that’d take a two-step thinking process to understand also. But, you know, I have been hearing a few people asking religious people the question, though (why so many are moving away from the church). So far, none have come up with the correct answer. None are allowed to: they all get paid for not saying the correct answer. The only one you can trust… is me. I don’t lose nothin’ for telling the truth. (But I bet my high school grammar teacher would like to tell me a thing or two.)
Some things are improving:
In the early 1960s, arguing in his Honeymooners comedy show, Jackie Gleason would hold his fist in front of his wife saying: “Do you want to go to the moon, Alice?” instilling a sense that it’s okay to beat your wife. But, today hopefully that only goes on in Muslim countries. The essence of the marriage standard is the real culprit; therefore put much more of the blame on the Pope instead of Jackie Gleason. Song “Boom, Boom, Out Go The Lights” by Pat Travers, 1979, is another one: “No kiddin’, I’m ready to fight: I’ve been lookin’ for my baby all night. If I get her in my sight: Boom boom! RIGHT HERE! Out go the lights!” I don’t recall anything like it since.
The people who pay the church the most don’t want to hear it:
Therefore, there are a great deal of people in this society that don’t even know that Jesus did “assure” Fair Afterlife Punishment, and that restitution to the same exact victim is the only way to get out of it. If people simply were at least aware that Jesus said this, I bet (real) crime and ethical problems could diminish. Even if they only heard it once, sometime during their lifetime. Even if they only heard it once, neighboring a thousand cop-outs.
A “reverse mortgage”:
Yeah, it’s a good idea… as long as you hate all your children, or have never had any. I bet they don’t tell you that. Let’s see Fox News tell ‘em that.
Anyone own an inkjet printer?:
You may know that inkjet printer manufactures gouge us pretty well on the price of ink. What if instead, all that extra money went to a lot of people that didn’t want to work? Would we still have enough?
The world needs someone they all don’t like:
That should be me. All of us have people we don’t like, but what we don’t know is that we’ve learned lots from our… enemies; but, because of the power of self-pride and saving face few can realize it. Plus, someone you don’t like can or will better tell you your faults more than a friend. The world will improve much faster when everyone realizes their faults.
I say, whatever way you have to spin it to get the spot right:
Conservatives are part of the Antichrist:
Jesus believed that the man with two shirts should give one to someone who has none. But, today’s conservatives believe that not only should the man with two shirts get to keep them both, but that the sandals of the man with no shirts should also go to the rich man. That way the rich man has more. Watch Rush, etc.
Who’s Americas biggest enemy?:
I’d be careful listening to guys like Hannity, Glen Beck, etc. They would cause a financial crisis in this country just to make Obama look bad; especially if it mainly affected the poorer half. It’s those types that caused 9/11, the Iraq war, etc. I don’t want to become their next victim – why do you? “Dumb” has something to do with the correct answer. (Boy, if I wasn’t protected by my big monitor screen, I’d be bitch-slapped, hog-tied and kicked out the door by now.)
http://www.pinesol.com/cleaners.shtml, Pine-Sol® Scented Cleaners:
I had no idear! And, to align them right after “diaper pails.”
http://www.answers.com/stupid (dictionary), “stupid”:
1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
Here, I may be number one, but the rest of you are number two. I’d rather be slow but accurate, rather than fast but limited. There’s probably a reason for this.
Looks discrimination (in sex partners):
Today, we would like it if everyone looked like a ten. But, if everyone looked like a 10, then everyone would look basically the same. Diversity / variety in appearance adds an interest / flavor that we hadn’t already experienced. So, sexually desiring people that look different is the key to adding interest / flavor / spice to our love lives. I know we live in a time where monogamy is the taught standard. I’m just talking way above all your heads. You would not be able to figure any of this out on your own if you lived another 1,000 years.
http://pro.corbis.com/, Search # 42-19538037, For What Was I Created?, by William Holbrook Beard, 1886:
‘Cause something is better than nothing.
Opposites attract:
RE: Looks discrimination. Get’em mixed. When you mix Kansas girl with man from Kenya, you get the first black President. So, sometime before I die, I should hook up with… with… nice looking China lady.
God’s free food versus using hunger to motivate all to work (what we’ve been taught):
“I believe in the dignity of labor, whether with head or hand; that the world owes no man a living but that it owes every man an opportunity to make a living.” –John D. Rockefeller, Jr., 1941. Since Lewis and Clark reported a wealth of free food and free building materials in the uncivilized lands, the world does owe every man his basic needs.
“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” –(attributed to) Thomas Jefferson. Well, this “proves” I’m wrong. I guess we should not give to those “who would not” work. But, we should give back God’s free food and free resources to those “who would not” work. Which is a lot. More than I have today, because it was 100% organic food (the expensive stuff) and much cleaner water.
And today, the more we force people to work in a society where technology is antiquating lots of jobs, the more we are causing deceit and lower quality in products and services that affects everyone.
Ancient Egyptians probably printed up free money to finance the building of the pyramids:
What would have happened if they had instead just used that same free money to pay all those workers to just stay home for all those years? Right, we wouldn’t have the pyramids; but, there would have still been enough food and shelter to take care of all the workers. The point: If they “could have” done it then, then we can do it today. Let’s start by going back to the 1950s when few women worked, where there was lots more honesty and talent in products and services. Then have the women work, so to allow those who don’t want to work to balance out a new pride and talent in future products and services. It could be that I’m just older and wiser, but there sure seems to be a lot more incompetent business employees than there used to be. I think another cause for overall high ignorance in products and services today, is when some postgraduate student is forced to come up with something new: something that hasn’t been thought of yet. More and more I hear about new ideas and changes that “sound good,” and if that student happens to be very articulate, and most are, then that’s all that matters to have the stupid idea implemented in its field. Some fields need change, but some don’t! I used to study nutrition for example, but got out of it simply because there were so many contradictions. Everyone, every magazine, book, newspaper, etc. thinks they have to come up with something new, so we can end up with the total mess we have today. And, all that just makes it harder for people like me to get a new (but, still very old) religious message out. Everyone just thinks it’s just my new spin to try to sell something, or to see if everyone falls for it, but mine has been carefully researched and thought out, with the very unique difference of not relying on being paid or initial acceptance. So, I have to just wait for someone of high influence to “just” tell everyone to understand it. There’s no way my kind of stuff can win on logic alone (people aren’t that smart), especially when so many churches make so much money telling the rich what they want to hear. Even if no one preaches a word, the eucharist alone covers anything you want it to cover. Baptism is the best, because it motivates a one-time change in the moral attitude, from that point forward (it doesn’t forgive past sins). It’s a one-time knowledge of a one-time assurance of the one solution of Fair Afterlife Punishment. A sacrament that has to be repeated every Sunday not only causes a new tithing every week (to keep clerics from doing productive / beneficial jobs), but conveys that past weekly sins are being forgiven, so one won’t have so much on their plate when they die. Of course, Protestants are continually forgiven so they think they won’t have anything on their plate. – Absolutely no reason to have to be good. Again, “Jesus” says making amends to the same exact victim is the only way to avoid Fair Afterlife Punishment.
Neckties:
If I had to think up something new for my postgraduate degree, I’d tell that neckties shouldn’t be worn. That they hamper the turning of the head, unnecessarily irritate the skin, and can cause the Adam’s apple to bulge out. Would my new / different idea be found as an improvement or not? Plus, it is used only for a sign of pretentious servility, something the Book of Revelation says to not do, as everyone deserves equal respect. Sweaters that surround the neck would still be recommended as they keep the neck warm in the winter – a “functional” reason.
Obama’s stimulus package:
That’s creating a bunch of new government jobs to employ the unemployed to stimulate the economy. It’s not exactly my plan to give everyone a free government allotment, so I have to improvise: These new government jobs needs to be geographically located in areas where there are lots of unemployed people. I mean, if the new government program is located in a town where few are unemployed, then few will be able to take the positions; or, private enterprise in that town will have to suffer a large job loss, which would just cause more problems. I mean, if it gets to the point where all the new government jobs start causing our favorite cereals to not be on the shelves, or the government has to start making washing machines because they took all those jobs away from private enterprise, then I’d say we went too far. You can offer to pay the unemployed people in other towns to move to the towns where the new government jobs are. I guess that’d be the best way to handle it. All in all, if we just create a bunch of government jobs every time private enterprise stumbles then that’s just leading us to communism, isn’t it? My plan, to just pay everyone a basic needs salary would both stimulate the economy and keep jobs in the private sector. Of course, that plan is the ultimate perfect future final solution, which apparently can’t be realized today. I just hope that Obama’s attempts to do it half right at least helps… as long as it doesn’t destroy private enterprise, which may not matter too much either way. Again, the only thing that creates a good economy is just making sure that the harder, less desirable jobs, get paid the most – like laborers, doctors, etc. Doctors, for example, should be paid more, but not ten times more than they should. That’s why we have a large health crisis. You see, we also need to just figure out exactly what works best in private enterprise and what works best being part of government. In either sector, the problems we all hear about are problems that can be solved if everyone knew about Jesus’ assured Fair Afterlife Punishments. But, that would require a very large step of someone very influential. And, most people would tell me that that’s just not going to happen.
When everyone gets a basis-needs check from the government, private enterprise will see more profits in supplying the basic needs industry, instead of fluff for the rich. Will that somehow mean that more people will have more and better basic needs that they do today? Maybe the rich can save all their millions for a rainy day, or can spend it by filling their house(s) with lots of basic needs. Sounds good to me (but, is still an exaggeration). Instead of “Gourmet” coffee, we’ll allow everyone to have just coffee. They’ll be saying in Colombia: “Sorry, don’t have time to work in the gourmet plant this week – we’re too busy making more by just growing more coffee.” Our government giving a basic-needs check to everyone, is like forcing more for the poor. Obama would like that, but instead trusts the “experts” more.
My job is to tell the solutions; your job is to ignore it… but to still bitch about the problems.
So, hang on Republican Party: you’ll have your chance again:
My ending all taxes proposition:
What all this comes down to is, only if humans are any more intelligent than the rabbit that just hopped across by yard, the key when printing up free money is to know exactly why and how to spend it. But, if you’re not even understanding why everyone should get a free basic-needs check from it, they I’d say that no worthy intelligence exists for us to correctly benefit for this cause, because it does have the potential to make matters much worse. In such case, then yes, the many limitations in making sure the government only spends with what it taxes can be our only way. That includes the never-ending gripes in trying to determine exactly how much more we need to take from the rich to give to the victims of the imperfect system; including all that bookkeeping necessary instead of making more stuff; and the policing of same. Maybe we should let all the crooked doctors bill whatever they want to the insurance companies; but, still allow the banks to profit from the high interest gained supported mainly from the free money printed up from the government. That way a house will really cost the worker – the one who really makes things – five times what it cost to build it in the first place. Yeah, let’s just put all that outrageous profit in the pockets of those who don’t produce anything. Since there’s no intelligence to do it any other way, I guess we’re all stuck. You know, there may be a “reason” why the Bible said to not charge interest.
Jesus was so far left that it would make O’Reilly’s head spin:
But, today, Jesus is much more supported by the conservative right. This fact just helps assure me of my logic that the Antichrist is today’s mainstream church, mainly the Protestants. “Antichrist”: Something that most people think is of Christ but is really more the opposite. I can’t thing of a better pithy word for the Book of Revelation to use (Antichrist). I (only) know for a fact that I have hit the nail right on the head. I mean, Hitler, Stalin, etc. are all dead, but overall ethics still isn’t really any better. – Anywhere close to the glory of what the Book of Revelation describes. I’m telling you, I’m the only one who has it all figured out, and it all boils down to the pithy word “Goldenrule” with the simple added commentary that anything else is a cop-out. Until that phrase becomes mainstream in the churches, ethics will never improve (overall). And with so much support for atheism (caused simply by the religious sex lie), it’s just going to get worse. It’ll be 100% whatever you can get away with in the near to far future. (Today, it’s about 50% that.)
Dissemination of my website:
One way someone influential could disseminate my website is if they became a major victim of some of the evil I write against. Of course, that still may take a two-step thinking process to realize; but, if the victimization is bad enough, it is at least “possible.” However, most people of influence have had pretty good luck, and are financially well enough off to keep themselves from severe victimization. So, it’s still a long shot. Most people would say I have to be crazy to even think that any of today’s Christian leaders would, and I would have to agree with them. But, the news media’s too dumb to even know what I’m talking about most of the time, when I’m talking religion. It’s like if every auto mechanic in town lies about what’s wrong with my car, and I tell the media or courts about it who are not auto mechanics, then how can they believe me?
3-24-09 Press Conference: Obama’s “heartbroken”:
And, that’s “good”; but:
http://gerridetweiler.blogspot.com/2009/03/keep-roof-over-our-childrens-heads.html, Keep A Roof Over Our Children’s Heads:
Yet, due to the housing crisis, one out of fifty children are now homeless and these numbers are only expected to worsen as 2.4 million families are projected to lose their homes this year.
I’m just dang proud that “I’m” probably their best friend in the entire world, because if the government would acknowledge my Lewis and Clark findings, and implement my government-paid basic-needs allotment, then no one would be homeless. You see, the intelligence now exists; so, worry about Fair Afterlife Judgment.
God is constantly adapting to His environment, based on His laws of physics (prerequisites):
Every star, planet, star, flower, monkey or human has come into being by their past prerequisites adapting to Their environment. It’s not like God can do anything, or we wouldn’t have to breathe. God is still limited by having to deal in emanations only from existing conditions. The “reality” is, existing conditions can limit a lot of progress, and would destroy everything if “accidents” was the only thing that caused change. “God” is the underlying drive that wants it all “better.” Even Jesus said that some seeds fall on rocks and end up dying; therefore, Jesus is in agreement with me that there are a lot of factors working against everything that God wants as good. Atheists think that everything is made better and adapts to its environment only via mistakes and mutations; but, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that mistakes just makes the bedroom messier, and the rocket blow up into pieces and not reach orbit. Bedrooms only get cleaned up when a type of prerequisite intelligence is behind it, like your mom yelling at you to clean up the mess! Rockets only make it into orbit when a type of prerequisite intelligence does everything correct. Yet, scientists still believe that no underlying drive could be behind everything from the “big bang” to now. Doctors can learn how complex and intricate the human body is and how that most everything works together in conjunction with everything else. Atheists say it’s just a coincidence that the retina in the eye just happened to accidentally fall into the right place with a million and one other factors just in the right place. They can call it “surviving mutations” which is the same as “surviving mistakes.” Good thing eyes didn’t develop on the bottom of our feet, but then no one would miss a step. The ear just happened to mistake itself into place to so perfectly hear sound. And, if mistakes created it all, then where’s all our other organs and faculties that would be there sensing stuff that doesn’t exist? Each body should all have billions by now! If there’s no underlying intelligence, how would it know that it’s not needed? I mean, what would keep us from surviving if we just had two or three extra sensing organs fully operating but not accomplishing anything? I mean, a car can still go down the road with or without rear stereo speakers. So, why hasn’t “accidents” placed some stereo speakers and maybe some microphones in the human body’s left rear tire? Huh? Why is that Mr. Atheist? I don’t buy it all, so I believe in God.
I guess an atheist would believe that since things have evolved for the better via mistakes, then mistakes is the best thing humans can do to make it a better world. (Well, those who supported the Iraq war apparently thinking so.) But, I bet atheists still hope no one makes a mistake when driving a car their direction. If I’m wrong, then we should say to God (or whatever drive created the Big Bang): “Thank you, for the mistakes.” “My momma thanks you, my daddy thanks you, my brother thanks you, my sister thanks you, and last but not least – I thank you!”
If I failed my Ph.D. dissertation because it was filled with mistakes, I’d say: “Hey professor… guess what? Don’t you know there’s no God? Don’t you know what makes things better?”
We have a long past, so it may have happened, but I question if mutations have ever changed anything for the better. If they have and there’s proof that they have changed lots of things for the better, then I’d guess that God’s underlying intelligence is somehow doing it; which would still be testing things to see what kind of result it achieves. Therefore, it can also end up negative.
Sure, I don’t have “proof” of underlying intelligence (God), or “an underlying drive for good / better,” but one can just kind of know that’s what’s going on if you take a deep look at how and why things are and aren’t, and why things happen the way they do. Christians need to tell that since the Old Testament was overruled by Jesus (e.g., Matt. 5:38-46), who made a “new” covenant, then it should be only looked at with a grain of salt. In other words, many parts are correctly God inspired, but lots of other parts are later add on’s, corruptions, etc.; and again, God can’t stop seeds from falling on poor ground. The only person who can accurately cherry pick the right from the wrong is not me… it’s the “Goldenrule”! – Not a person, not a Pope, but a thing. A verb kind of thing, that cannot collect moths, grow old and wrinkly, etc. I am just the one who can explain many mysterious sayings of Jesus into the Goldenrule, where others have failed. I like Matt. 5:28-31 the best: I’ve never read any commentary equating sexual evil done with the eye as Goldenrule fairness in eliminating “looks discrimination” for the attractive – the main, has-to-be ingredient for a perfect future utopia. Everyone else’s commentary destroys mankind, because no one would ever have sex again.
The hardest thing for people to understand is why Jesus wouldn’t spell it out entirely, and how God can’t stop corruption, even though the last few versus of the entire Bible tells that He can’t; which also indicates that corruption had already occurred (something today’s churches say is impossible). It’s like I could have the perfect inspiration to build the perfect car; but, when someone thinks they need to change something – well, what do you call it then? I’m dead and gone, the car now runs worse. The Goldenrule is the one thing that needs to say at the top.
You see, mystery “parables” are not necessary to say if you’re going to add the explanatory answer right afterwards. Jesus even explained that these parables are only for certain kinds of minds to understand (e.g., Matt. 13:10-17). That they are ambiguous and can be interpreted in different ways to prove to others during Afterlife Judgment why people you may have loved have to go through it. Much of this was also necessary to allow later Christian acceptance, so I (only) could use logic today to reveal the true meanings.
Elaborations by disciples and Paul should also be taken with a grain of salt. Whenever there’s a contradiction “Jesus” is the one to follow.
Mr. Critical – Keepin’ ahead of the dogs:
TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/