Subject: Greetings and Salutations. No, I mean: Insults and Degradations:
March 8, 2007
…where no one can insult me back, cause I preserve enough spelling and grammatical errors to not be called articulate. So there! I mean: So their! The true sinners of this world love it when I speak about what Jesus really says in the Bible, but spell a word wrong or something. Their minds are filled with so many adamant cop-outs that they justify a misspelled word, misphrased sentence, or something, as proof positive that I don’t know what I’m talking about. I think a lot of people in this world would definitely forsake Jesus, if they really could read what He really said – without allowing some priest / preacher cop-out artist embedding their false cop-out / spin commentary. It’s like they ignore all the (important) commandments that Jesus says are necessary for salvation, and just emphasis on the fact that Jesus promises salvation. That’s kind of like telling a kid I’ll give him $40 to mow my lawn, but he doesn’t have to mow the lawn. The kid would like it, and would give part of the money to a priest or preacher who tells him that it “is” that way. The “only” problem is, which everyone likes to ignore, I’m not going to pay the kid the $40 until he mows the lawn. But later preacher Paul the Apostle “might” convey in the slightest, that the gift is free, to overrule pagan human sacrifice, etc., not realizing his letters of suggestions and further ideas would be published today for people who wish to have it overrule the commandments of Jesus.
And, when you read that stuff in the Bible you really don’t want to hear, if the priests and preachers ignore it, you think you can ignore it also. It’s because you are… dumb! and can’t believe that level of dishonest could exist. No other reason. Even in a world where money obviously pays for more communication, you still don’t realize it. And, in a world full of stronger and better communication methods, media people are so dumb they actually think they are good people. It’s a real danger.
Iraqi insurgents (or whatever you want to call whoever’s killing our boys):
I’m trying to find the best way to explain how things really are for those who are so much smarter than me, but since I’m not articulate, I’m probably not getting it across; but, I’ll try it again: What would make you feel justified in doing something that would cause your own death: (1) To kill someone who is a good, charitable person, who is not of your religion, because somebody tells you your religion says to kill anyone who is not of your religion; or (2) to kill someone for revenge who set your wife and son on fire burning them to death (and let’s pretend you were in a location where you heard their dying screams for about a minute or two)? You know, in 1991, I remember watching CNN late one night where they informed me about the U.S. bombing (and inner incineration, by technique) of the Amiriyah fallout shelter, in Baghdad, killing about 500 civilians (mainly women and children). Something about proving that we were successful in destroying a fallout shelter that Iraqis said could withstand a nuclear explosion, and on speculation that Saddam Hussein was in there, but saying it did cause a large amount of civilian deaths. But that was the last I heard about it. (But I’ve sure heard a lot about 9/11.) My question to the media is: What other civilian strikes (big or small) have we “accomplished” that I may have missed on the news????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Maybe we could share that information daily with the American people. Well, I’m also trying to find the best way to explain how our media people are evil, and that being probably the main contributor to our latest problem. So hearing about all the problems we’re facing in Iraq just gives satisfying entertainment to people like me who have knowledgeable and “fair” minds. I just hope someone will start listening to me (apparently only me) before the fighting ends up in my backyard. Again, “restitution” to the living is the only possible solution. That won’t help the evil-minded people’s afterlife much, but it should lessen or eliminated the violence in today’s world (as well as lessening evil contributors’ afterlife suffering somewhat). So, the next time I hear O’Reilly, and the like, talking about our heroic methods in Iraq, should I laugh or just think “pathetic”?
George wants one last try to save face: 21,500 more… please:
The President addresses a defiant congress: “That’s right, that’s right, I’m sad and blue ‘cause I can't do the boogaloo; I’m lost, I’m lost: can’t do my thing – that’s why I sing gimme gimme dat ding, ah… Gimme dat, gimme dat, gimme gimme gimme dat, gimme dat ding, gimme dat, gimme gimme dat, gimme dat ding, gimme dat, gimme gimme dat, gimme gimme gimme dat ding.” –The Pipkins, 1970. All you O’Reilly’s sing along. “Ah Gotcha!”
Space case: Lisa Nowak:
Crimes of passion wouldn’t happen in an open sex society. Crimes of passion are the result of the marriage standard (sexual based love for only one). Crimes of passion are so abundant in our society that cops pretty much know who the killer is once they find out who loved who. Lisa Nowak should be acquitted because it’s the Church that IS the cause of her crime. – Just in case you want to know who the real evil is. I am convinced that it would be impossible for you to be able to figure that out on your own. She is just a victim of the real (hidden) evil. “Hidden” because everyone is so extremely dumb (compared to how smart they all think they are). I’m not even as smart as everyone “thinks” they are. Surely societies of open sex have existed in history which have worked, but became killed out very quickly in a world full of war mongers who always identified with the marriage and/or prostitution standard, who rule about anywhere you go in this world today (with today’s easier travel and better communications). Some of the largest free sex communities were all the early Christians sects who weren’t (Middle Age) Catholic (or Orthodox). The last major Catholic “slaughter” of anti-marriage free-sex Christians was against the Cathars beginning in 1157 (Council of Reims). Cathars (who I noticed largely existed in the 4th century) believed that “marriage imprisons the souls in bodies by keeping each person from loving all the others” basing it on Matthew 19:10-12 and John 13:34 (which also sounds pretty darn gay if you read it by definition. Even though today’s gay churches base the allowance of the practice on the “God loves us all, so it’s okay to sin” cop-out. That’s even a worse reason then churches that condemn gays. The cop-outs are the first that have to go.) I think that was pretty darn cleaver how the Catholic Church tried to kill off an entire Christian sect (Cathars, who later became witches) so their practices don’t get disseminated into the future. As you can see, it worked rather well, don’t you think? Well, you don’t know anything about it, so that’s all that matters, isn’t it? You also believed the church when they told you witches could still live under water for over 10 minutes (so they had to be burned). You see, prostitution is something the church could somewhat handle (especially during the Catholic Pornocracy), but women who offered free sex would disrupt entire communities. Why would any guy want the confines of marriage if he could get it free? And marriage was generally cheaper than going to prostitutes. I’m sure glad I have Freedom of Speech protecting me, do you agree? If your name is O’Reilly or Hannity you “disagree.” To insult: O’Reilly and Hannity – you guys are articulate! And nothing else. Of course, with DNA paternity testing and a laxed marriage society, not too many people today should be out to get me. Again, not everything the church says is a lie. Basically, the most amount of truths one can retain, the better one can remember the few lies.
The Republicans want laxation on taxation. Republicans and Democrats are like trying to drive across the country, in 1920, without a map, with diapers on, to not stop to ask for directions, in a big hurry to get lost. Until I hear Democrats talking about full restitution (in addition to admittance of error) for the Iraqi people, I don’t think they have the solution to anything. And, that’s just an error on top of the error that “fairness” is not defined as just us having WMDs and other countries can’t. History has proven that other countries “need” WMDs to keep us in line, to treat their people right.
Since things are just getting worse in Iraq, I suggest rich schmucks like O’Reilly should start their ignoring of the Iraq boondoggle and push more stuff like the Anna Nicole Smith thing.
U.S. tortures terrorist prisoners with Red Hot Chili Peppers music:
Yeah I used to torture my parents with that kind of music. I’d drive ‘em crazy too. They just weren’t critical enough to get me to stop – ha-ha-ha! If you’re sayin’ those terrorists are like my parents, then yes – kill ‘em: innocent or not! … Just kidding.
It’s a different generation:
http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/1-23-2006-87118.asp, Unhooked Generation: The Truth About Why We're Still Single (book review):
“A consumer sex revolution leaves us feeling that settling down is more like "settling." Media messages convince us that single life is sexy and married life is boring.”
It’s a new generation out there, dummies! I heard it’s not unusual to share your girl friend with your friends, bi, mixed group sex, etc., in this younger generation. E.g., girls will actually perform a train for all her boyfriend’s friends, on his birthday. There’s like a desire for that. That’s not the way it was in 1973. The only problem is, none of them are old enough to change any laws or standards. We are definitely in a marriage-out transition period. And the only person smart enough who can properly bring us through it is me: There must be no looks discrimination soon or they’ll be multiplying problems. And there will surely be future problems which I’m convinced I am the only living person who can solve them, and I’m convinced that there are many who think they could be can’t. Be realistic: no one has ever lived who’s had a solution to all these war problems other than me – and the war solution was the shortest section of my 1998 paper. The main thing (here) is to get churches to quit lying about what Jesus really said about marriage and the family, which will justify cures for HIV/STDs. Then “rearrange” the same money for a Nationally Paid Child Support Program.
Utopia:
In addition to wanting someone who looks different, I’m guessing people will also really be into scents, because everyone has a different scent. God’s method of fighting viruses will begin to work again, once everyone exchanges fluids. That’s a lot better method than relying on drugs.
Slowly but surely:
It became a better world every time somebody died who was for slavery. It’s becoming a better world every time somebody dies who discriminates against blacks. And, it will be a better world each time guys like O’Reilly die, who are against open / free and bi sex.
That’s right:
|
Instead of just sexually desiring this:
|
We’re also going to sexually desire this:
|
So, utopia is not going to occur in this generation.
“There’s too many men; too many people, making too many problems; and, not much love to go round: Can't you see this is a land of confusion.” –Genesis, 1986.
“Tell me how am I supposed to live without you, now that I've been lovin’ you so long? How am I supposed to live without you? How am I supposed to carry on, when all that I've been livin’ for is gone?” –Michael Bolton, 1989. Can anyone see any kind of problem anywhere?
The question is:
When I know somebody is stupid, and they don’t know they are stupid, and them not being aware they’re stupid is the cause of the problem, then… should I call them stupid or not?
How dumb is the public?:
Anymore, if you’re trying to run a new business, you’d better have some good B.S. or you’re not going to make it. I’m thinking, if we could establish some kind of government, that would stop B.S. business, …. The courts definitely aren’t going to do it. If we could raise welfare, then many people might not feel the “need” to have to work, thereby eliminating a “need” to B.S.
Hey, you want a drag?
Okay, okay… The best thing to tell our kids (or anyone) to get them to not start smoking is to tell them that someday they will want to quit, and if they are addicted (and they will be if they keep doing it), it will be very, very, very hard on them, and many people find it impossible. After about fifteen years of two packs of (standard) Marlboros a day, very hooked, very addicted, I quit cold-turkey (the first time I ever tried), and haven’t had a puff since. Actually, I didn’t even know I had quit until later: I just wanted to see how long I could go, and analyze what it felt like to go without a cigarette. So far, I’ve made it over 20 years. But, I was climbing the walls the first couple of weeks. Every time my mind could start thinking about something else, my hand would reach over for a cigarette, which was right there for the taking; but, of course, I wouldn’t let myself have, feeling a strong frustrating pain every time. I though I was crazy for not letting myself have a cigarette – torturing myself like that. And, I wasn’t around people that much (who didn’t smoke), so there seemed to be little reason to quit. Back then, you could even smoke in an airplane. Afterwards, I had various intervals of strong cravings for about a year. My wife said my personality changed: I never started anything with anybody, but when somebody started something with me, my car came to a screeching halt, and I was out of that door ready to fight. (Good thing for me, they all chickened out.) But, after a year or two, I was back to my old pacifist self. Tell ‘em the best thing, by far, is to never start smoking. Quitting smoking was probably the hardest thing I ever did. Your entire body is telling you that you “need” a cigarette. It’s like someone cutting off both of your arms, then telling you to go on with life. You constantly feel something very, very important is missing. The fact that smoking is not as much of a fad anymore is something; but, if you explain it to them in a way so they can understand their inevitable, definite future suffering, none will ever start. “Just cause I said so” isn’t going to always get it. If their life is sh_t (e.g., overly stressed / overly “motivated” / overly expectant), and/or they’re blue collar, my method should even work then, if presented correctly. In today’s American “freedom” society, since the rich and lucky seem to only want to push everyone else to their limits, we should all feel it well to help those millions of future victims with a little intelligent reasoning, don’t you think?
Iran is supplying Iraqi insurgents weapons that kill American soldiers:
If nothing else, sounds like some sweet revenge for us supplying Saddam Hussein weapons to kill Iranian soldiers in the 1980s.
Donald Rumsfeld:
Instead of firing Rumsfeld, I think the President should put this back on the Oval Office desk:
If George was one-tenth the man he thinks he is, he would admit guilt to the insurgents, then give his body for them to tear to pieces, as a gesture of good faith to end the violence against American soldiers. That would be “one” worldly sacrifice: one-tenth of a human sacrifice compared to the next ten Iraqis killed within the next, say, 24 hours, thanks to George’s unfairness. Again, it’s not the next ten Iraqi who die’s fault, it totally George’s. George definitely doesn’t want to look at it from God’s point of view. George should pray to God that there is not such a thing as God. Or, the Protestant cop-outs definitely allow relief. I know George isn’t going to even consider it – I just like writing about what is really fair, and what are real solutions.
Iran throws the word “fairness” at the White House:
“Questioning whether it was even a ‘serious offer,’ the White House is dismissing a suggestion from Iran's president that his country would stop its uranium enrichment program if Western nations did the same.” Hey, that’s my line. Who said Ahmadinejad was allowed to use it? But, since his entire life, livelihood and country depends on it, it’s “possible” he could have figured this out on his own by now. The White House got a good laugh out of it. Which just proves that fairness has nothing to do with it. “Power,” and just saying we’re fair, and everyone being stupid enough to “just” believe it, is the name of the game. And George knows it. I can’t believe Fox aired it. Don’t they know that it placed the fairness reality thought in millions of Americans’ minds, who otherwise would have been oblivious to it? That’s not going to help George’s popularity if he decides to begin air strikes. Fox News also told that Ahmadinejad discovered a cure for AIDS. SHUUU! Don’t you guys know all of the AIDS cures are to be silenced? (It all has to do with money, dumbos, [for the rich {they think}].) I think Ahmadinejad is really provoking our President for making such an (AIDS) anouncement. Now the U.S. government has two reasons to start an attack. I think the media needs to hire an informed government advisor who screens all new stories before they go out, so you won’t goof up again. You see, government advisors already have this stuff (to suppress) already figured out: you news people don’t. Respect their expertise: government advisors have spent years figuring underhanded conclusions, to find out what Mr. Critical can figure out in seconds. They’ll even help you with “disinformation” tactics, once a boo-boo gets out. You can’t let the public know about this stuff, this is the land of the free (to be underhanded). I bet none of you news people know that the government saves tax dollars by allowing abortions, either. (Even pro-lifers like Bush didn’t even know that until he had been in the office for a while.) (That’s why he doesn’t mention the subject anymore.) (Don’t tell anyone I told you.) (It’ll be our little secret.)
The Kingdom of Heaven:
I was just thinkin’ the other day when I was getting some wood cut, when Jesus comes back, I think He won’t feel like He’s in Heaven or Paradise… until He visits a Home Depot. Since Jesus was a carpenter, He’ll surely be in love with all the newer supplies, building materials, and great ideas. So the next time you’re strolling through in the Kingdom of Heaven, have some respect for those dusty aisles.
Protecting Muslims:
Since Fox News is really emphasizing that the terrorists hate us because we are predominately not Muslim; you oughta run and tell / enlighten ‘em that Clinton killed innocent Christians in Yugoslavia in 1999 to protect the lives of… Muslims. That’s right. The American public might be interested in knowing this as well. But, then, they’ll probably ponder on an idea that there may really be another reason why the terrorist want to kill us.
Try to keep up New York and California:
I don’t know about the rest of you, but here in Kansas, when we buy a new computer operating system, we “like” it to be “compatible” with our current and old programs and formats, to justify the move to just some added fluff. You never know when you’ll have to look at an old drawing, spreadsheet or document that was done in a program that you don’t want to have to repurchase, or that had to go out of business because of the Microsoft monopoly. If the old program won’t run, and if the format is different (as most are), you’re SOL. Possibly we here in Kansas were the only ones who did computing prior to… 2007. And, accepting Microsoft updates will make your hardware less compatible on your existing system. I think we live in a country where we should have a compatibility click that really works. If nothing else, hard disks today are large enough to easily have partitions for even the oldest programs to run. A current operating system should be ready, willing and able to allow and work with that, and without having to reboot. I think Bill Gates would just like to have everyone go back to 1982 and do it all over for him again. Let me know how I’m the dummy.
You know, computer makers and Bill Gates like it when you don’t know how to fix your slow and messed up system. They don’t care if you lose years worth of work, pictures, etc., if they can just sell you an all new system to start it all over again from scratch. They make more money that way. They’re not “stupid.” It’s the media and our government that’s “stupid.” If things aren’t like that in Iran, maybe we should let them take us over. Of course, I’m talking here about home users, so I’m just blowing in the wind again.
If Bill Gates gets his way, by 2030, we’ll all want one of those new Personal Univacs that we can use right in the house. We’ll be able to query: IF ten is NOT six, AND IF two is greater than zero, THEN is four greater than X? Then it’ll start a-blinkin’ and a-shakin’ and a-smokin’ and a-tootin’, and then spit the answer right out the side. Then Bill Gates can start to become a billionaire all over again. Bill Gates thinks that since he plans to give it all to the poor (per Luke 18:22; Matt. 19:21), it makes it alright to take it with unrighteousness (ignoring Matt. 19:19). So, he’s going to be surprised.
Google-eyed:
What you people from California and New York don’t understand is that here in Kansas, we like to get things done at a little bit faster pace: One can get Google-eyed when researching links in order of popularity instead of proximity. For example, when I Google Search two words, I first want to view the hits where the two words are closer together, instead of sorted just by popularity of the website. So, I’ll get Google-eyed when trying to correlate looking at the two words located in totally different areas of the Web page. That’s where one eye is looking up the Web page and the other eye is looking way down looking for the other word. When I turn toward other people, they’ll ask if I’ve been drinking noticing how my eyes are looking two different directions: up and down. Now don’t misunderstand, Google is the best thing since Jesus Christ; but, here in Kansas, we’d like a Google proximity option (beyond using asterisks). For example, when I search important issues like “cat” and “mouse,” then find the words close together, that means it’s surely suppertime for the cat. Inversely, when the words are far apart, then I must be wanting to find a vegetarian cat to adopt. And a vegetarian cat site would not be very popular in today’s society. Also, allowing wildcard characters would be a helpful option. Again, don’t make it default, make it an option… for us here in Kansas who do serious Web research -- not for all the rest of the world’s idiots who still seem to get paid whether they get it right or not. What am I talking about – “I” don’t get paid… when I get it right? But, then I have to realize, when I talk above everybody’s head – ‘cause that’s where the answers are – I need to realize they have no choice but to ignore me.
Fluff Queen:
Enough rattle tattle about Anna Nicole Smith, I say. I guess the fluff press can’t resist a fluff queen.
What’s best: abstinence or cures?:
Hey, if Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has a cure for AIDS, and he wants to announce it to the world, I hope Iran wins their conflict with the United States and to the extent that he becomes President of the United States. It’s time for the people of the United States to have some true freedom for a change.
Al Gore: the “hypocrite”:
Yackety-yak is steaming about Al Gore’s homes not being as energy efficient as he preaches. “Conservatives” are stressing a point that Al isn’t doing his part. Well, from God’s point of view, assuming that Al Gore’s global warming message is of good cause, God much more wishes someone of high influence like Al Gore, to use their power for the betterment of all, instead of just one or two houses complying. So, God is like millions of times more pleased with Gore’s presentation, and just one or two times disappointed with Al Gore’s personal noncompliance. Conservatives who enjoy making the hypocritical point, are only causing many people to discredit Gore, and therefore also his endeavor; which will just cause them to reject Gore’s helpful awareness and recommendations. That will cut into God’s millions of times more gain, making Al’s personal noncompliances look like nothing. But, again, conservatives are God’s number one enemy. The prevailing problem is as usual: they’re all too stupid to know it. I know my religious conclusions are all based on what is right for the whole of the world, not necessarily to what I personally follow. That’s actually the key to finding righteous truth. When one cannot go beyond the barrier of what one personally wishes, then the barrier can never be passed. I just personally profess to fit into a few of the standard American stereotypes, while my Goldenrule explanations go beyond it. My advanced commentary actually even condemns myself to afterlife pain and suffering. So, you all can call me crazy, but… I think God really, really appreciates it. What is more important to God: if I present what He wants said, or if I just say what’s good for me? But, since we’ve all be “taught” that hypocrisy is bad, it makes most people agree with the conservatives. The word “hypocrisy” is defined as someone who “professes” to be a certain way, but isn’t. A sort of lie. I’m not professing to be everything I preach. Personally, I’m: When in America, do as the Americans. That’s how I keep my sanity. In times past, when I started becoming too good of a person, I could detect the evil in others much better; leading to direct criticisms, which just made me personal enemies / problems. For example, do you see me going down to the stock yards trying to save lives? Then I’d be in jail, and then you all wouldn’t have the pleasure of my harsh and logical criticisms that could change the future for the better. I mean, as far as I can tell, nobody else has all this perfection figured out. And I doubt anyone in the future will know how to juggle it all, when I’m dead and gone.
Goldenrule film: Amazing Grace:
–The British outlawing slavery in 18th century. The same thing will happen over eating animals someday. With the same kind of proud and honorable feelings. We’re all too dumb to know this today. Then, there will still be secretive animal slaughter until the end of that generation: New people won’t “need” to eat meat. In the 18th century, articulate conservatives like Hannity and O’Reilly would have presented evidence to keep slavery legal: They’d just show two drawing: one showing humans and one showing slaves. So people could easily see the difference. Plus, being spin experts, they would have really exaggerated the economic pitfalls of outlawing slavery. – Consequences that would surely last for centuries. Kind of how they’d think raising welfare today would cause. They’d say, “Why would anyone work if they had enough just to make ends meet?” (– Like everyone who lived in Kansas City 200 years ago.) Maybe… for “more,” coupled with “something to do.” With less deceptive products and services (satisfying those who really just don’t want to work), and with guaranteed rewards for those who think and discover better methods (instead of letting them put the screws to everyone), we’d all have more while working less. Then, for instance, all our houses will be painted with Paxcon (sparing many against tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.). Okay, now give me my retirement for life reward for thinking of this. Second thought, I’ll be a conservative and take… “more”; because, retirement for life just isn’t enough to get me motivated.
Coffee break:
I found a new addition for my kitchen cabinet:
Va-Va-Va-Voom!:
Bill Oh’Really! with Fox News tells how PETA people strip to the buff, to gain exposure. Well, I still haven’t found anything to criticize. I just hope someday the rest of you will be operating at 3 PETAhertz. (That a million times 3 gigahertz.) I think most people have to be able to think that fast to be able to reckon on their own that animals don’t like being eaten. Then we can say, “A yotta is a lotta.” Those are thoughts that will make your head glow. So, Fox News needs to turn off the lights sometime just to see who’s got it and who doesn’t.
Neither do I have anything bad to say against Russia; but… just for scaredy-cat reasons. (http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/3/5/132423.shtml?s=lh)
–“Paul Joyal, who works for a Washington-based government consulting firm, was shot on March 1 by two men in his driveway. … Kremlin watchers have found an emerging pattern: Putin cannot tolerate criticism, so he eliminates his enemies one after another -- sometimes by poison, and sometimes by a well-placed bullet.” Of course, if you mess with me, you have to worry about what God will do to you (in your afterlife). If you mess with someone else, well, you have to worry about what God will do to you (in your afterlife). Get the picture? So, since I’ve got God and the First Amendment protecting me, to Vladimir Putin: You ugly THING, you! Now, if somebody comes to my door, I’ll say, “No, no, no, no, no! I was just warning you all, about what O’Reilly or Hannity or George W. Bush or Mr. Peabody said.” I think if the Russians want to stop criticism in the United States, then they’ll have to hire an awful, awful lot of hit men. That would have to be a never-ending, escalating kind of situation, wouldn’t it be? But, you never know: Next week you might read: “Mr. Critical was critically injured.”
No Russian mafia scumbuckets who only care about themselves rather than the benefit of the people, are going to come over here and shut the mouths of our media, at least not this one. I’ll personally kick you goons’ asses left and right all the way back to the Kremlin if you show up at my door. Tell ’em how to take criticism like a man George. At least I can give you that.
Angel of Death:
Regardless of how much money you have, or how lucky you are, he awaits for those who hurt the innocent:
Who else should God allow him to wait for? Especially guys like O’Reilly who should know better.
Mr. Devil looks like he’s ready to eat some meat – how about you?
Faith alone, etc.:
Now, there may be a few individual who can concur with me about the reality of church cop-outs, but they probably aren’t aware that it’s the cause of a tremendous amount of the problems we see in, and out of, the news. The stuff is in the New Testament to make this world a utopia, but it simply isn’t getting preached, or preached correctly. Allowing the (true) sinners’ actions, and telling the rich what they want to hear, is paramount today. It’s like a very silent kind of (cop-out) allowance, that just hits the right spot, to create the most havoc in today’s world. One must have a very, very high I.Q. just to understand it. Otherwise the churches wouldn’t have been able to establish it through the last 2,000 years.
It Can All Be Gone, Jamie Lee Thurston, 2003 (country song):
“I just want to see someone stand up and tell the truth. Not analyze or justify – it ain’t that hard to do! Talkin’-walkin’ a straight line, down that old path of right and wrong.”
Mr. Critical, in Kansas – Keeping a straight line on the variable issues:
-- Home (Index) --