Subject:  To put it pithy:

“Faith alone” justifies unfairness against the poor; and, people’s disbelief that everyone is really that dumb causes the sex problem.

2-24-09

The best and smartest thing to do for the economy:

If everyone right now starting getting a government allotment of say $500 per month, the rich people would not start buying more because they already have what they need and want (they’d just add it to their savings), the middle class would buy a few more things, but the poor would spend it all to get the things they need or want.  That’d surely stimulate the economy and create lots of private enterprise jobs “right now” if all of a sudden the poor and some of the middle class starting spending.  That’d also be mostly helping the needy, but also Circuit City simply would have survived if this would have been implemented back in November.  That would also pretty much pay the car payment on getting the middle-class newer cars to drive. – A different approach in saving the car companies.  (Do you think that  might work better than just bailing out car companies who aren’t selling cars, so you have to keep on bailing them out …?)  The poor people would have more incentive to work, simply because a job allows them much more overall income.  Think what a guy’s work incentive would be if his total income was double what his job at Wal-Mart now pays.  Again, guys that make double than what Wal-Mart pays don’t only work half the year, because they “like” having “more.”  (I know that’s hard to understand.)  What discourages people from wanting to work is when they have to work their ass off and have little to show for it.  That’d make me want to give up and look for a way to just stay home and be a bum:  Maybe I could just move back in with mom.  Plus, that would surely get a multitude of these people off drugs.

Like I’ve said before, if you just give a tax cut to the working poor, then the employers (there’s not “stupid”) will eventually just be able to pay them less to compensate for it.  So, your tax cuts alone are really just helping the rich in the long run.  But, when someone already has an income of say $1000 a month for doing nothing, then they have more “bargaining power” to not come into the crummy job unless the employer pays enough to make the difference worth their while, which would be more overall than the worker would be making with the job alone today.  So, there would never again be anyone ever working for a little as many are barely surviving on today. Any job will have to be allowing someone’s overall income to be more than the base slavery we can never improve on today.  There will always be poverty level employment unless we change to my plan. And, all this time the employer can pay them less than before, allowing their prices to initially go down (not up) and/or allowing their savings to grow so they’ll be in less risk of their business all of a sudden failing.  In fact, the more free money we give everyone in government allotment the more employers can lower their prices.  If you just raise the minimum wage, that would cause inflation as the employers would simply have to charge more for their product, devaluing the dollar (which also takes away the poor person’s raise).  In my plan, the dollar would have more value, causing the greatest demand ever in honest products.

Now, one-step thinking has always said that we can’t pay people for not working, but two- or three-step thinking says it will not only work, but it is “fair” according to the free food reports of Lewis and Clark in the uncivilized lands.  So Congress and the American people would have to understand all this before they would approve it.

Plus, overall, this will separate the ones who want to work versus the ones who don’t want to work.  Those who don’t want to work make the worst workers anyway.  They overall do everyone a better service by just staying home.  Today, we have lots of people who want to work who can’t find jobs, with a lot of morons doing the jobs.  My plan will “redistribute” all that.  And, as we all know, morons can get lucky and become executives, politicians, etc.  My plan would eventually allow the person who really wants to do “good” the better chance.  Plus, some people will be satisfied making ends-meet by just working a part-time job, which I’ve always heard is in great demand.  But, most will enjoy having a new car every couple of years, two or three vacations / cruises a year, etc. – All they’ll have to do is work the same amount of hours that now only pays them for their basic needs.  Plus, ask anywhere if tourism helps local economies.  Mothers will get to spend more time with their children as the child will get an allotment as well.  It worked fine in 1950s.  Today, most mothers are working, but is the economy really working that much better?  Therefore, even if we lost a staggering half of the population in the workforce in my plan, things would likely turn out just fine.  I mean, there was even Macy’s back in the 1950s.  Likely anyone who’s not a mother, will want to work under my plan.  There’ll be nothing but positive reasons to work, nothing but gravy, at that point.

Then slowly start eliminating taxes, so to not give the rich so much more buying power over the poor; and by starting with eliminating the poorer people’s taxes first, trickling up to an eventually total tax relief for even the super rich.  The tax cuts Obama has implemented is good, but we need a really big one to keep the banks from closing and the stock market from crashing.  Anything we do after that will be harder than doing it before.  I mean, in a country that has no food or products for sale on the shelf, you can’t give everyone a bunch of money, because they’ll be nothing to buy.  I suggest doing it now while the system is still working, the trucks are still moving, when the stuff’s for sale.  You see, it would have been lots easier for a bunch people to go into Circuit City back in November with money to buy stuff because it was sitting on the shelf, with a staff that could order more.  But, if everyone lined up at the door with thousands of dollars of spending money at Circuit City now, nothing would happen as all their shelves are empty, and the store buyers are sitting at home unemployed.

Deep thoughts:

How do Lady Bugs do it?  Do they get on top each other then roll all around?  Sounds pretty good!

Fox News is causing the stock market to crash:

All I’ve been hearing on Fox News lately is how bad it is for Obama to just print up money for increased spending.  But, I’m listening but I’m not hearing any “logical” reason why.  Lots of it talks about how our children are eventually going to have to pay the bill.  But, if printing up free money with big spending helps the economy, when everything is going well, why would anyone want to stop something that’s working?  Then if there’s a slump, who going to thing that we should start taxing everyone more to help it, paying back to something that we really don’t need to pay back to, which wouldn’t do a bit of good?  That would just make a slump worse.  I’d like to see Obama raise taxes on the rich, just because the rich were complaining so much about how he was increasing the national dept.  I think Fox News is going to put down Obama right or wrong.  But, with all the “experts” at Fox News telling about all the doom and gloom of Obama’s stimulus package, it’s going to cause the stock market to crash; as Fox New does influence a great number of a very influential part of America.  “Just trusting” Fox News “experts” without any specific rational logic can overwhelm the human mind.  Try to understand, it’s “just trust” first, “logic” second.

The fact of the matter is this:

Give billions of other humans thousands of years of financial trade, and they’re going to see continuous economic problems.  Give me five minutes of serious thinking on the subject, and I’m going to come up with a much better solution.

Hey, Saturday night!:

If Obama’s worrying about what the people will do if they knew that we can just print up free spending money:

It shouldn’t be a problem as the President and Congress would have to approve every government spending increase, so no individual would be able to demand something just for them (like that damn Mr. Critical tries to do); and, all government programs would (1) be limited by not being able to compete with private enterprise, (2) would have to only pay for programs that are beneficial, and (3) would not be able to pay employees a salary that competes with private enterprise salaries:  If jobs are lacking in private enterprise, then the government needs to actually start paying their employees less to get more workers to move to private enterprise jobs (basically how it is today).  That’s right, less free money when it starts hurting something else.  This is one of the “lines” we can’t cross, but we can go (spend) up to that line.  Politicians will have people griping on both sides so they won’t just have the overwhelming pressure from only one side.  Fairness to private enterprise would always find the best favor from constituents.  I mean, if you ever saw how slooooow many government employees work, then you’d understand the need for private enterprise:  Noticing the efficiency and pride of a Burger King manager in just cleaning the tables, compared to seeing the games, depression and animosity of the typical government employee, makes me want to just hold my head up with hope (while at the Burger King).  And, the high degree of corruption and fraud in privates enterprise, like doctors who over charge insurance companies, needs to be “policed.”  Or, I think doctors would still do the work for a lot less, so socialized medicine is probably the answer to that one.  That way also sounds more like something that won’t reward the doctor for messing up the operation.  When curing a patient saves the doctor more time, we might find all kinds of cures.  It’d be like how our court judges are paid: they have a tendency to discourage law suits in hopes it will get them out of future work.  If doctors could see things the same way, I bet they’d make people healthier.  After reading the facts, they’d all probably advocate vegetarianism, push for less other bad things in the food (more organic), etc.  Make it beneficial to the one’s we listen to: the doctors.  So, when you have the right program, lots of other things will probably fall into place.  Today, and in all past years, nobody has been able to think outside their one-step thinking, greed box.  Christ even said the solution was in treating others better, but that logic has to be approved by the vast greed leaders of our past.  Today, we “just trust” those past leaders.

Basically, private enterprise that proves itself to be too corrupt should be changed to a government agency (slow is better than corrupt).  And, any private enterprise that proves itself to work better in slowness, should also be a government agency.  Those exist (when unseen accuracy counts).

The best time to implement my government allotment to everyone plan is when the economy is good.  But, what will happen is only when things get a lot worse than it is right now, is when it will be considered.  But, that’s when it will be harder and longer before we see its benefits, thereby discouraging its benefit before it’s given a fair change.  That’s why I’m stressing it all now instead of later.  Or, we can do it slowly to make sure it’s going to work: If it shows real signs of failure, we can stop it early.

You know, with the way Huckabee definitely has the right appealing “charm,” and the way Hannity fuels conservatives’ anger, the stock market could be failing very soon.

Maybe this will help:

The part of the human brain that emits our anger is in a very old middle base primitive area.  Still quicker and more powerful than latter developed thought and judgment areas.  And, our first impulse still rules many decisions, especially in self pride and saving face.

Mr. Critical – Way ahead of my time.

TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/