Subject:  Attention world:

 

Especially those who eat and poop.

 

2-10-09

 

http://www.vegetariantimes.com/resources/why_go_veg/ (Vegetarian Times), Why Go Veg?:

People are drawn to vegetarianism by all sorts of motives. Some of us want to live longer, healthier lives or do our part to reduce pollution. Others have made the switch because we want to preserve Earth’s natural resources or because we’ve always loved animals and are ethically opposed to eating them.

Thanks to an abundance of scientific research that demonstrates the health and environmental benefits of a plant-based diet, even the federal government recommends that we consume most of our calories from grain products, vegetables and fruits. And no wonder: An estimated 70 percent of all diseases, including one-third of all cancers, are related to diet. A vegetarian diet reduces the risk for chronic degenerative diseases such as obesity, coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, diabetes and certain types of cancer including colon, breast, prostate, stomach, lung and esophageal cancer.

 

Bush’s last White House Press Conference, 1-12-09:

Bush said that Iraq “not having weapons of mass destruction was a significant disappointment.”  The fact that Saddam Hussein was not developing WMDs is an overall good thing.  You see, George only cares about his own self pride / image, not what’s beneficial for others.  But, it’s statistically improbable that future Presidents will be able to think any different.  Exists only “one” who can be a worthy religious leader, and probably only “one” who could be a worthy President.  And I really don’t want the job.

 

Sorry, out pooping.  I’ll return soon:

Well, PETA has their method of attraction attention, and I have mine.  (Notice how PETA’s method is better than mine.)

 

Atheists and natural selection:

Stating natural selection and/or mutations as the complete cause of evolution means things have gotten better from things that have gone wrong.  That theory just doesn’t hold water.  I say evolution only makes things better by some kind of underlying intelligence / drive.  Still not perfect.  Still “progressing.”  And, still not knowing exactly what that should be (trial and error, but of a superior kind, yet more limited then human / animal ability).  And, this “drive” has had to exist since the beginning of time.  Many people assert a strange, unexplainable “wind” that guides them to certain destinies:  An underlying power that “propels” them.  And, many good achievements can fail through natural selection: many “destinies” cannot be fulfilled.  Therefore, natural selection and mutations is like the Devil fighting against God, not the other way around.  There’s still evolution; but, apparently I’m the only one who can explain how it works.  Sure, natural selection is a prerequisite to further achievements / wonder, but take away humans’ ability to defend themselves from animals, then eventually the lion would regain control of the world, and destroy everything else humans have achieved.

 

Saying that mutations made everything up to humans is like saying it will eventually do the same to make computers.  We can just set back and not make computers, because accidents will eventually make them, including the software.

 

John Lennon’s 1971 song “Imagine” suggests that there’d be more (or even complete) peace in the world if there was no religion.  Contrarily, I say no one is going to largely sacrifice for the Goldenrule unless they fear Fair Afterlife Judgment (God).  Now, true, John was predominately seeing a religious world filled to the max with all the (mainly Protestant) cop-outs intended to overrule the Goldenrule.  So, yes, there is predominate excessive evil in the world based on the “religious” cop-outs, but not on the specific teachings of Jesus.  (The Israeli situation is probably the best overall example.)  If John was alive today, and I explained it to him, I don’t see how he could disagree with me.

 

It appears like there’s some kind of “drive” disallowing people to know what I am able to figure out, apparently allowing me to be the only “one” to religiously follow, as when there are more than one in perfection, then things can get quit a bit jumbled.  Like if you have two generals of the same rank on the front lines, and one orders the troops to charge, and the other orders the troops to retreat, the troops aren’t going to know what to do.  Therefore, sometimes there has to only be “one” of a certain kind.  And, I am it (religiously).  I don’t mean to sound so arrogant or “crazy,” but logic dictates such as the fact.  The real progress in this age, since the 1960s, is ethics.  And, I think I’m its culmination / fulfillment.  The pill was the key.

 

“It is estimated that there is one porta potty for every 6,000 individuals attending the presidential inauguration”:

Well, sounds like something that should be Barack Obama’s first attention in the correcting of government matters.  Get congress together.  Get that problem fixed.  Otherwise, we’re probably looking at many arrests for indecent exposure.  “Dumb”: I’m probably the only one who can correct many other (non-religious) problems.  There’s a possibility they’re just telling people that, to encourage everyone to make a stop before the leaving the hotel.  But, I’d bring along some antibacterial wet wipe packets just in case.

 

Pride in war:

If I was a slave in the South in 1861, and President Lincoln told me he was going to do something to make me free; but, the two children next to me would have to experience a horrible death for it to happen; if I was a normal person, I’d say go ahead and kill the children, so I can be free, and I would thank the President very much for it.  But, if I was truly as honorable as only Toby can sing about, then I would have to tell the President: “No thank you, please don’t kill the children, I will remain a slave the rest of my life.”  Otherwise, innocent people are going to have legitimate complains.  My solution provides no legitimate complaints.  And, folks who have legitimate complaints against you is something you really, really, really don’t want to take with you in your Afterlife.  Because, God will not ignore fairness pertaining to individual rights, just because one can easily evade it during the living years.  Unfairness to one does not justify gain for others.  Even if it’s just a slap in the face to one innocent person to save the lives of millions – great, do it, but just realize you will still get slapped in the face during your Afterlife, or “fairness” doesn’t account for anything.  “Logic”: many people don’t like it.  There’s a reason why Jesus told that being an honorable slave in this life is much better criterion for being a king in the everlasting Afterlife.  Rich people “can” be honorable also, but it’s very unlikely as it is very easy to lie to oneself.

 

Of course, people could have rightfully told me in that day (1861), that there was no religious fear of God, to cause reason for the importance of fairness (to free the slaves).  Secular things have changed a little since the 1960s, but no one has quite hit the nail on the head, except me.  All talks of peace will be in vain until there’s a solid logical teaching of Fair Afterlife Punishment, instead of today’s overwhelming “faith alone” or “Jesus paid your penalty.”  Also, assassinating the direct individual unfair leader is the only and best method in a violent solution (then, telling the next leader to not be unfair, or they’ll eventually get the same).  But, the U.S. can’t do that, as we have proven too many times that we will kill innocent people for military advantage.  So, we lack the integrity to justify such an assassination with “never hurt an innocent person” as the foundation.  So, until my way gets disseminated and understood, yeah, do what the total pacifists say and just don’t implement any violence at all:  Americans have proved too many times that we’re not smart enough to know what fairness is, and too evil to even consider it.

 

If someone came into your house right now and killed all your loved ones, would knowing that their religion didn’t preach sufficiently about Fair Afterlife Judgment, make you want to legitimize their actions, even if they were just following orders?  Absolutely not, as that kind of evil is also fully attributed to the individual, since doing evil even under duress is still an individual’s choice.  Those kinds cannot enter the future Kingdom of Heaven, or it would fall.  And, it’s true that clergies who preach the cop-outs, ignoring the true “do” (and “do not”) messages of Jesus, will fall even worse.  There will be a barrier, and when one is dead, suffering is the only way for one’s sole to change for righteousness.  Otherwise, giving an evil individual “Freedom” (in the Kingdom of Heaven) who “just thinks” they’re righteous, will allow them to eventually destroy all its goodness.  Again, lying to oneself is so predominately easy in the human mind that most will not understand why they have to suffer equally for their wrongs against innocent individuals, until their bad deeds are constantly being reminded to them as they suffer each victim’s equal pain.

 

Fox News doesn’t understand why two wrongs don’t make a right:

Surely Huckabee is appalled by the reports of Gaza Palestinians who aren’t justifying Israel attacks (because of Hamas missiles shot into Israel), while they’re locating their loved ones crushed under the rubble; especially when they know about the Jews’ intruding importance of worshipping God in the actual city of Jerusalem, instead of West Texas.  “Evil” is probably the only thing Fox News can think about the Palestinians.  Well, at least Fox News is reporting the civilian loss and their “evil” opinions, which is a great step.  I don’t recall them doing that during the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

 

The Jews need to pray to God at the Western Wall that God is not a fair God.

 

Sum buddy ced duh ree zun Hitler wuz meen tuduh Guuz kuzz tha’s (duh Guuz) ‘er cimmodder phoak’s.  I’z cimmodder din Guu’s kossa izs goughtidet aul pheggerred owt an day eint.  Sew dare.

 

Love “can” be a tool to make people like each other more:

This here durn world cannot optimize true love when sexual “love” is controlled by marriage, monogamy, she expects him to do these things, he expects her to do those things, etc.  That’s not true love.  That’s all various forms of conditional love.  “Free love” (i.e., “free sex”) is the only possible way to optimize true love in this world.  “Money” (child support) is the secular greed obstacle in the way; and, gullibility (believing the lies) is the obstacle in the way of true Christianity.  (I know you’re ALL too dumb to “just believe” me.)

 

The 2009 Presidential inauguration:

Quite a hootenanny!

 

Think how screwed up the world would be if people didn’t die:

Best examples: O’Reilly and Hannity.  Their definition of superiority is not admitting fault by adamantly not changing with the better.  Pithy enough?

 

Would you be justified?

(Say you innocently just happened to live next door to an Iraqi insurgent safe house, or next door to where Hamas is carrying out an attack against Israel.)  If you were just about to be blown up by a military (like say the Israeli military), but you could prevent it from happening by killing those soldiers (only) carrying out the attack, would you be justified?  The correct answer is “yes.”  So will be Fair Afterlife Punishment in retribution to any soldier who kills an innocent person.  The only justification for defending oneself is when one does not kill innocent bystanders, regardless of how important the mission is.  And, if you believe the mission is worth it regardless, then realize that you WILL have to suffer equally in your Afterlife for every innocent person you kill / hurt.  With that “logic,” I think MANY will find that the trade is not worth the value of the mission.  But, just because churches don’t preach Matthew 5:23-26, doesn’t mean it’s not from God.  And, just because Muslims don’t heed Jesus’ words, and just because the Jews are like O’Reilly and Hannity above, also doesn’t prove it’s not from God.

 

So, if you’re one of the leaders who ordered it, or one of the soldiers who carried it out, you may well have “gotten away with it,” but remember, you haven’t in your Afterlife, where all Fairness will win.

 

 

Look, you all do a lot of things right, and a few things wrong.  I’m just trying to correct the wrong things.

 

 

Perspective:

You may see a great gathering of faithful supportive followers:

But, what I see is an accumulation of organisms who just eat and poop.  That would be my report if I was a visitor from outer space.

 

One’s not really too much different than the other.

 

What’s with these new glasses that block the peripheral vision?:

Should I talk about the pitfalls now, or should I wait until someone makes a lane change into my car?  “Dumb”:  It’s getting worked into every product now-a-days.

 

“Hey, we eat and poop too”:

Yeah, and you probably won’t make a lane change into my car.

 

(Sorry I couldn’t find a picture of the little guy pooping.)

 

All you liberals are wrong: Hannity is worth something:

It’s like when I’m getting tired of shoveling snow off my porch and driveway, I’ll just start thinking about Hannity; then I can get really angry to attain the energy I need to keep shoveling.  Or, same thing if I need to lift something heavy.  TMTH: “Temporary madness, thanks to Hannity.” – It gets the jar open every time.  So, Hannity, you’re worth something, spinning everything against the poor and needy.  Grrrrr!  It just makes me anger… so I can work better and get the job done.  Thanks.

 

But, sometimes I think the world would be a better place if Hannity could somehow just eat and poop, and stop there.

 

Dialogue:

“Don’t you ever see the starvation in the city where you live: All the needless hunger, all the needless pain? … We can change the world, now. We can save the children. We can make it better. We can make it happen.” –Chicago (band), 1972.  Oh, did they happen to read the Lewis and Clark Journals?  It’s not that we “can’t” feed and house the poor, it’s that we don’t think it’s fair that we feed and house the poor.  The Lewis and Clark Journals will make people realize different.  Of course, it needs my added commentary so highly educated people can see the correlation.

 

Oh:

President Obama should order the military to never hurt an innocent person, even if it’s part of a military operation.  Otherwise… that would “justify” the other side… in doing the same to us (by the current rules of the game).  “I” say let’s not justify the other side’s hurting of innocent Americans!  Plus, that’s choosing yourself to feel the same innocent death in the Afterlife.  Oh sure, a cop can shove an innocent bystander while he’s chasing a desperate criminal, but he’s not allowed to seriously hurt the bystander, especially to the fate of death.  If we’ll do it for innocent Americans then we can do it for other people in God’s world.  Unless you’re an atheist or an idiot.  Plus, killing innocent people in war is like Hannity’s way of doing it.  I mean if the mission risks severely hurting an innocent person, then you can’t do it!  Otherwise, God will place your soul for the same severe suffering in your Afterlife.  So, it’s not worth it in that case.  And, I don’t want to see Fairness mandated on you.

 

Try to look at everyone in the world (including the bad guys) as Americans.  That will make you “better” than O’Reilly and Hannity.

 

“Odds are he won’t live to see tomorrow” –Johnny Rivers, 1966:

I say if we can’t even get a spy to infiltrate al-Qaeda, because we can’t find someone who looks the look and talks the talk, then I’d say we probably don’t have enough justification for anything else.  Or, that their justifications for 9/11 must have had merit (according to the same rules of the game we go by).  Because if we could get a spy in there, then we not only could figure out where everyone is, but could get one of those big talking Hannity types to suicide bomb only the “bad” guys, or just shoot the leader, sparing innocent bystanders.  But, if we couldn’t find “one” Hannity type that’s Muslim, then we must not really have that justified of a cause.  Again, the “rules of the game” that we also go by is definitely killing innocent civilians (e.g., Iraq) whenever it’s to any kind of military advantage.  Israel just did the same thing.  9/11 was the same kind of moral, just from the other side.  Not being “aware” of this correlative moral “fact” is going to create “more” problems, not less.  9/11 should rather be a teaching that we shouldn’t have this justification for killing innocent people either, not the mindless, one-sided sentiment all Americans have today.  I mean this paragraph is conclusive proof that only I could be a good President.  And, if none of you can understand any of these moral war issues on your own, then what makes you think you have the I.Q. to figure out any other issues about sex, the economy, religion, or animal welfare?

 

The U.S. implementing suicide missions killing only the evil leaders, would not be hurting an innocent person, as Fair Afterlife Judgment does not punish a individual for their own suicide, especially if it’s stopping someone from killing an innocent person.  There has to be another person as the victim.  Of course, additionally, we’re not going to find anyone who supports Hannity that would go on a suicide mission, as all of Hannity’s followers are just big selfish talk: nothing to do with real fairness.  And selfish doesn’t want to die, selfish just likes going to Iraq for the hopeful thrill of maybe getting to kill somebody (anybody: guilty or innocent).  If you don’t believe me, listen to our troops’ testimonials, mainly during our invasion.  They like it! (going in killing people).

 

Have You Forgotten?, by Darryl Worley:

This song held the number one position on Billboard’s Country chart for seven (7) weeks, debuting 3-8-03, during our Iraq invasion.  The statement in the lyrics: “Some say this country’s just out looking for a fight. Well, after 9/11 man I’d have to say that’s right” showing the same kind of mentality of someone who’s angry at his boss, and comes home and takes it out on his wife and kids.  “Intelligence,” which lots of country listeners apparently don’t have, would dictate that one who has been victimized should not take it out on someone else.  The above statement in the lyrics was saying we’re justified in attacking Iraq because we’re angry about what Osama bin Laden did to us, and we’re too dumb to think above the average animal.  And, that our high communication skills just makes us much more dangerous than other animals.  Tell me how I’m wrong.

 

What is God?:

To start with, God is a kind of “drive.”  The first point in time needs something (actually, itself) to “push” it to deviate it from a never-ending continual straight line.  (See, it didn’t even know it was traveling in a straight line until something pushed it.)  Then the point has quantity and perspective with distance and movement.  Everything in the universe seems to go in a straight line unless something “pushes” it in another direction – like light, a falling ball, your car, etc.  So, the first point has to have a “drive” that “recognizes” that it is now two points, then three points, and so forth.  So, there’s a lot of “thinking” (pushing) going on that’s causing or is allowing it all to happen.  This drive apparently likes what it’s doing, so in continues and therefore likes and seeks the diversity of something new.  Like Hitler rolling his tanks across Poland?  No.  Because God (drive) has spend way too much time desiring the glory of all it’s creation, and has “hooked up” our senses in a way to stop the pain and to pursue the pleasure.  The problems we experience today is that we are not all hooked up to the same master control.  Therefore, one’s pleasure can be another’s pain.  Since the “drive” appears to be trying to have us all more work together than against each other, “fairness” seems to be the instruction from God.  You see, selfishness is the “bug” in our software / nature, that God can’t “just” overrule (or Hannity would “really” care for the more needy).  If such is the current problem for both us and God, then why should God talk about anything except the Goldenrule, as any other issue would just take attention away from the Goldenrule: the only way things can overall change for the better?

 

Our Godly directed pursuit of pleasure over pain tells me that someday open sex will eventually overrule ignorant games and unfair selfishness for the prostitution of that same product (women).  So, it’s not God liberals should fight, it’s dumbness and prostitution.  But, no one today who is married (or has a girl friend) can “talk” about Biblical “truth” or they lose their immediate source for their sexual pleasure.  So, the celibate Catholic clergy are the only ones who have the “option” to be honest; so, “saving face” is the only final obstacle.  But, that’s not an easy one to conquer either.

 

Perspective:

You may see a great gathering of faithful supportive followers:

But, what I see is a bunch of people who would really support me, as this exhibition only tells that they want the kind of change that only “I” can bring.  It’s not Obama they want so much, it their imaginative dreams of the perfection that Obama can’t achieve:  A “drastic” whole different way of looking at certain things, of which all would initially disagree.

 

Fair Afterlife Punishment: The balancing act:

Lots of people think their good deeds with overrule and block the rightful individual Afterlife punishments of their bad deeds.  But, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich will soon find out that all his good deeds (for the people of Illinois) aren’t going to allow his bad deeds to be ignored.  Why should it be any different concerning fairness in the Afterlife?

 

It’s not that Blagojevich is so dumb talking how his good deeds should sway people’s minds (making people think the case is about something else), it’s the fact that people are so dumb that this tactic has worked many times.  It worked in the O.J. murder trial.  Plus, the way I see it, Mark Fuhrman is the one who really got O.J. off (for murder) because of his discrimination weakness, yet Fox News seeks his advice on many other important issues.  Fox shouldn’t complain about O.J. getting off (then), then have Mark Fuhrman on seeking solutions to other problems.  It really just shows how Fox News is a racist station down deep.  Oh, I know they allow black commentators their word all the time, but that’s just to cover up the reality.  It’s like how you can tell that the Fred Phelps family is Huckabee’s kind of people down deep (except at the military funerals).  The two mainstream overwhelming taught “stereotypes” are Right and Left.  Those are the main two “boxes.”  The Right emanates from the rich and lucky, who just selfishly want more for themselves; and, the Left emanates from the poor and unlucky, who just selfishly want more fairness.  And Far Right is where “Fair and Balanced” news would rather be.  Try to be honest guys and let it out: Go ahead, let ‘em know how you really feel. – That’ll better help the people distinguish the good from the bad.  Quit fooling yourselves by thinking you’re not still living in the 1950s.  Realize, there’s a lot of others in this big country that feel the exact same way as you do (down deep).  Allow them to make their true mark on society before they all die.  Look at me, you can tell I completely let all my thoughts and feelings out.  You should be able to do the same thing!

 

If Blagojevich didn’t break the law, then I’m sure our courts will try to get him anyway, just to save face.

 

It’s just in:

Illinois senators say “unanimously” that good deeds don’t outweigh bad deeds.  It appears the good deeds didn’t even get measured.  It will be the same for Ex-President George W. Bush, for allowing the killing of innocent people in Iraq.

 

Bong:

Ask Kellogg’s if all of Michael Phelps’ achievements make up for one very minor “wrong.”

 

“It’s the most wonderful time of the year”:

(Sorry, I’m a little late on this one.)

 

Why should I care about the animals?:

I’m not going to waste my hard effort, time and money writing on an issue that’s not in real ethical (eventually winnable) need of change.  You see, I’m not just working for things in my current life, I’m working to win in the far future – so no future generation can rightfully say I was wrong (about my major points).  Unlike other people, I’m smart enough to know true right from wrong, so I’m not going to support something that’s really dumb and evil, like eating animals.  If I was working for the money, I’d be like O’Reilly.  If I was working to have a job, I’d be like all the rest of the media.  But, I’m working 100% for God, forsaking even myself.  So, you’re gonna think it’s a little “weird,” just like Hannity would be stoned to death 1000 years ago for “speaking” against slavery.  “Weird” and “evil” they’d think, in a reverse kind of way.  They’d like his belief that anyone who has sex with strangers deserves STDs.  Especially if they were Muslim.  The difference between Muslims and Hannity types is that Muslims are more honest about their sexual beliefs, where Hannity types likely have sex with whoever they want, but condemn others for doing the same.  If Hannity types have only had sex in marriage, both as virgins, then I’d say a rather low libido God has gifted them with… for some unknown reason.  I mean, in addition to Cytomegalovirus (CMV), which “causes permanent disability, including hearing loss and mental retardation, for 4,000 to 7,000 babies” per year, one can also get type 2 (genital) herpes from just kissing.  Herpes can spread to the eye via just touching oneself, and can cause blindness!  Recently, the Discover Channel told about a woman who actually died from an internal herpes reaction for just kissing a guy in a bar (or, she reluctantly allowed him to kiss her).  And, Hannity actually thinks the government shouldn’t find cures for this kind of stuff (STDs): that’s what he told someone in a street interview.  His solution was “just don’t have sex with strangers.”  Hannity and his types are worse than trash, logically.  And, the lie of the word “fornication” is what hold’s their stance so strongly; just to please “her” (the dishonest prostitute, who’s also so dumb she thinks she’s an “independent” woman – because she still accepts his favors).  So, (concerning the definition of fornication) “I” (only) am the solution to another major problem.  “Explain” how I’m wrong?  If you never address the root of the evil, you’re never going to solve the problem, no matter how logical your points are.  After my wife died of cancer in ‘89, where I was forced into the singles’ world, if Hannity types had their way, I’d have all kinds of STDs by now, if I hadn’t known to use condoms (short term) and nonoxynol-9 (long term).  And, the government is trying to discourage and suppress the use of nonoxynol-9 just because it doesn’t hamper sexual enjoyment, which can lead to promiscuity – no other reason!  Because, abstinence doesn’t work when she’s ready, for a man with an average libido.  If the girl’s not allergic to it – and the vast majority aren’t – then it should be advised to use.  People who like controlling other people’s lives where no innocent person is being hurt, has always been the scum of the planet, and are on their way out eventually.  Hannity types aren’t smart enough to realize that.  I’m telling you now, you’re going to “lose” in 100 or 200 years!  Then, that’s forever.

 

Now, there are some other important conditions for sex:

Sexually Transmitted Infections – The Facts (handout brochure), Planned Parenthood, 2007, Jon Knowles, back cover:

In other words, to be pithy, in One Word: the Goldenrule.

 

My economic plan is best for the future and the present:

Lots of businesses are going out of business and cutting jobs.  My economic advice would cause even an “immediate” solution to this problem:  If everyone all of a sudden had more spending money (“my” plan), then Circuit City, e.g., could stay in business.  …  Well, do it your way:  Learn the hard way.  It certainly can get very, very bad before authorities start listening to me.  I guess you all simply don’t know the best thing to do:  You would have to “just trust” me.

 

Of course, it could be Windows Vista that put Circuit City out of business.  I mean, if I could just go to the store and spend $2,000 to solve my computer problems, then I would do it a heartbeat; but, I know I’d have to go through another long learning process with Windows Vista that would require me to have to start over with every other program I’ve spent so much time having to learn, attain and become accustomed to; with no real improved functional gain.  I would spend $20,000 to be able to stay with the working system I already have, or something that’s “compatible.”  We live in a time where people like to “just” change things for fad reasons only, which usually causes more the loss of productive functionality than anything else.  It will never end until people quit trying to “say” they have something “better” than somebody else, and as long as people “just trust” people in charge. – Unless Circuit City is going out of business because of Windows Vista.  It could be that some of the typical American business practice of putting the screws to all its consumers is finally catching up to a lot of them.

 

Possibly the reason for these repeated recessions is because of improvements in products and technologies (over Microsoft).  Naturally, when we build things that lessen the need for employees unemployment is going to go up.  My plan would allow the raising of everyone’s free government allotment as technologies lessen the need for workers, instead of all these never-ending recurring bad-times periods, trying to eventually bounce back the hard way every time, and in ways that probably just creates more dishonest products and services.  Eventually (on my plan) things would get where only a few work.  That’s the goal isn’t it?  My plan would allow for that, where the current system definitely doesn’t.  Every one would still want to do something all day.  But, the goal is for us all to be able to do what we want to do instead of things that are harder, tedious, boring, dangerous, etc.

 

It’s like fixing a computer virus:

People ain’t gonna know it unless they get “taught” it!  Believe it.  And, remember that even after all these things get taught, when we accidentally don’t teach it to someone, they’re not going to know it (except for the sex issue: they’ll be smart enough to understand how open-sex is okay by default; which explains why there had to be the biggest corruption stigma ever to have what the church still thinks today).  That’s right, today’s Pope is really as dumb as much as he thinks he’s smart.

 

O’Reilly said he eats meat, and admits he doesn’t care if it’s unethical:

He also emphasized that that he doesn’t like people like me calling him unethical for being unethical.

 

O’Reilly doesn’t like it when he becomes a victim of it:

O’Reilly was pretty angry about one of his stocks crashing, where the individual responsible for the crash was still rich.  Something about wanting to pay him a rather unfriendly visit.  Bill, kicking the little people (the many) for the advantage of the few is the standard Republican motif in this country that you’re supposed to support.  You people say that’s the way it should be.  You know, less government (less unfriendly visits), etc.

 

Gold investment commercials:

It must be selling, or Fox News wouldn’t have so many.  How can gold be such a good investment if they are selling it?  Oh, in case all the banks crash, which might happen.  Where the entire monetary system ends.  So, maybe the buyers are counting on that.  Either way, I’d buy houses instead of gold.  I could be wrong.

 

Well, Fox News Channel needs to get their revenue from somewhere, right?

 

In some cases, I would actually recommend atheism:

I tell ya’, as far as a personal turn on, I’ve found there’s a BIG difference between women who really, really enjoy sex with a man, and those do it and like it, but really don’t care that much.  But, I think these women gifted with these very high libidos are a little crazy in the head, simply because of the very negative stigma of being the worst thing a woman can possibly be for just strongly enjoying something they can’t help – logically, that would drive a person bonkers.  Atheism is their best way to somewhat keep their sanity (even in today’s society).  I’d say chances are good that the vast majority of you men out there have never been with this kind of woman.

 

Somebody help me understand:

What exactly is the moral difference between what Blagojevich did and the monetary contributions of Washington lobbyists?  I mean no law or decision should be made by either direct or indirect contributions, charm, whatever, other than the merits of the law or decision alone.  That’s for crooks like Hannity.  And, any President or congressman who sways in that fashion, I say fire them all on the spot, and hire some high school dropouts who happen to be honest, who would then be able to do the same job but much better.  Then things might start improving in this country.  You see, it should be honesty first, experience second.  Any high school dropout can hear both sides of any issue and likely make as good of a decision as all the experienced crooks we have running things today.  To replace the lobbyists, how about we just send anonymous emails to Washington for things we want changed in some kind of fair and balanced fashion, where all suggestions are determined by the logic of its content, instead of who’s saying it; and where the receivers would determine the merits of a suggestion based on sound thinking instead of rejecting something just to save face or side with a party to play the game?  (A rational person would say: That’s never going to happen on this planet. And I would agree, so I am actually wasting my time talking about it.)

 

Like the dishonest prostitution (marriage) standard, I’m guessing Blagojevich was too direct and therefore more honest about how it really works, and needed to be more shifty and dishonest in the way it really works.  Then he’d still have his job, like all the “smart” politicians do.  It’s like it most cases, if you need the governor to sign the papers needed for your horse track or children’s hospital, then you need to make a large financial contribution to his/her campaign fund, without the governor having to say that’s what you need to do.  I bet there are a lot of (even good) things that don’t get funded or built because they never “figured out on their own” the correct way of getting it done.  In this country indirect dishonesty pays.  But, it’s very likely hampering progress.

 

“Dumb” it explains a tremendous amount of problems we all end up being victims of.

 

(Report to the mother ship:)

And, of each Earth unit, it is on their forward or upward side that intakes this function, which also sounds many noises.  The backward or lower doorway is crafted as the outlet, which also informs by sound.  Most often the forward / upward noises communicate at a rational level equal to that of the backward / lower noises.

 

Who’s the worst: the evildoer or the teacher?:

Hannity, O’Reilly, Huckabee, Cavuto, etc. – they’re not the most evil-minded in the world.  Some of these may not even agree with their extreme one-sided, all-for-the-rich points of view.  The worse evil minds are the people who watch their programs and like what they here.  Those are the many Americans who would send millions of (non-family) people into a prison of torture for the rest of their lives, just to make a nickel.  Those are the ones worse than the atheists.  Those are the ones who really, really feel a lot better after attending church for the necessity of easing there consciences.  Hannity, O’Reilly, Huckabee, Cavuto, etc. may have just found that the more they speak for this extreme Hell bound trash of mankind, the more accepted and successful they become in their category; which is evil, but may not be near as evil as those viewers who fuel it.  Consequently, the media stars will feel the greater brunt of Purgatory as they cleverly teach even more people to support the evil, as sins can be also be attributed to sinners’ teachers.  By the way, I know the word “Purgatory” is nowhere in the Bible.  It’s just the pithy way of saying Matthew 5:23-26.  We could call it: “Afterlife prison that you will eventually get out of, based on the equal degree of your wrongs against others.”  I’m also aware that the celebrities’ technique is to say something obviously morally correct to properly fool people in their later support of saying something of a hidden evil, so to possibly even convert good people to become evil.  Basically they tell that poor people are evil for accepting welfare from these who work hard to earn it.  That’s why my Lewis and Clark free-food findings is so important, so I can rightfully say: It’s the “lucky” (better raised, better motivated, better looking, smarter, etc.) who have benefited from a system that has taken away God’s (organic) free food and free building resources, and don’t want to “give it back” to the “unlucky,” entirely for maximum selfish greed reasons.  Ironically, Hannity, O’Reilly, Huckabee, Cavuto, etc. are the real evil Jesus speaks about in the Bible, because those kinds are the types who regularly attend church.  That’s because churches today or nothing but Antichrist cop-outs.  I am so right, and they are so going to greatly suffer in their Afterlives if that Bible they stand by is right.  A girlfriend of mine said they’re all atheist, they have to be.  They just go to church as part of their deceitful show.  I don’t know, “dumb” might still rule in most cases.

 

Not all Americans are this extreme kind of evil.  If the general population was smarter, the vast majority would get rid of people like Hannity, O’Reilly, Huckabee, Cavuto, etc.  For instance, O’Reilly sees an epidemic of female school teachers having sex with their underage students.  I don’t think it’s an epidemic: my guess is it occurred as often before the “epidemic.”  I think whenever O’Reilly first complained about it, that caused other officials to “think” it’s something that needs to be cracked down on.  So, when an occurrence comes up, the prosecutors now act where they’d let it slide in the past, as there are many laws in the books that get overlooked when there’s no victim.  Oh sure, there’s a victim in the mind of O’Reilly, but that’s why he’s all high communication skills and no real intelligence (strongly can’t think outside any box), and therefore shouldn’t be doing what he’s doing (influencing regressive change).  Yet, all the other idiots in this country will “just” believe his judgments (thinking it’s progressive change).  I’d guess “dumb” rules 90% of our problems, and feel-great-after-leaving-church-evil is the remaining 10%.  But, that 10% may run half the country.

 

So what really makes America better than some of the others?:

You know, Americans have died in the battlefield to allow “me” the uninterrupted Freedom to do what I do.  Nope, Hitler or Stalin would have had me shot, railroaded or entrapped a long time ago.  (So, I guess I’m going to take useful advantage of my great opportunity to talk about people who eat and poop.)  Personally, being shot would have put me out of my misery pretty quick.  Being railroaded would have guaranteed me three square meals an day, a warm bed to sleep in, and good health insurance.  But, constantly having to avoid entrapment, every trusted official letting me know I’m not welcome in their demographic, and all the added harassments that waste my time, has to be a kind of slow torture.  If the people (that 90% crowd) only knew.

 

In the Afterlife, who’s going to Heaven and who’s going where Hitler and Stalin are?  Yes, I like the idea of that.

 

Well, John Lennon complained about it too.  So, I guess Nixon and his goons are in ….  You say, “Well, we have the same Freedom to be a goon, and guarantee our souls to Hell.”  That’s right, contrary to what the church teaches, God can’t “just stop” evil in our world.  And, also 90% of the people would stop you if they had the same knowledge of God.

 

Just note this:

Hopefully when I’m resurrected back to life in say 1,000 years, there will be many to greet me lying on their backs wiggling their toes in the air.

 

Dumb one-step thinking – it is a life or death situation:

Food producers would much rather serve the people cancer-causing pesticides, than go out of business by letting a few people find a bug in their food.  If it looks prettier, then it’s American (or, more “civilized”).  You just think when you’re in America that you’re safe in mother’s arms.  You just think when you vote for a politician, that he will do what’s “best” so you don’t have to think about it or know anything.  In fact, even if you get welfare that pays for all the things Lewis and Clark reported was free from God in the uncivilized lands, you still deserve a free car, nice furniture, boat, etc. because there’s a good chance you’ll unfairly be getting cancer and dying earlier.  You see, the free food Lewis and Clark reported had no pesticides, GMOs, etc.  So, if you’re dying from cancer right now, with education, you’d agree with me that you’d have had a longer life, if you were born in Kansas City 200 years ago.  (Only Mr. Critical can make a hillbilly look smarder than a city folk.)

 

For some reason (to keep you coming in) doctors don’t tell the best solutions to your problems:

This is from personal experience.  When you have a medical problem, go to the doctor; but, also click around the Internet for a possible better solution.  Seriously, well over half of my medical problems were bettered or solved by taking Internet advice than what the doctors / (even) specialists told me (or, after they ran out of suggestions).  Some will generously give you lots of samples to try what never seems to work.  I think I’m a guinea pig, and am paying for it.  Once a friend suggested something that my family doctor never mentioned (and, after he said he didn’t know what else to try).  It required a prescription though, so I actually advised my doctor to write it for me.  It worked.  This is a pathetic country!

 

And, I doubt even Barack Obama knows what’s really going on.  Presidential advisors / researchers even need to rely on somebody in their inquiries to be honest, unbiased, and/or willing to lose face.  Bush’s WMDs in Iraq might be a good example.

 

I dated a psychologist once who more or less admitted she doesn’t tell people the things that would really solve their problems.  I think the only kind of problem a psychologist can “solve” would entail a simply one-session “teaching” about excessive stress traps, like thinking the word “prefer” instead of “have to.”  One can still build the highest pyramid when they only “prefer” to do it, instead of “having to” or even “should” build it.  And, they’ll enjoy doing it much better.  One can graduate college better when they “prefer” to do it, instead of “ought to” do it.  This way, they get to keep their sanity open and negotiable to solve other problems and to “see” other solutions.  By the way, under my economic plan, everyone would more “prefer” to graduate college instead of “needing” to.  One can do any job better when they “prefer” to do it instead of “having to” do it.  People need to just notice how authorities, police, school teachers, parents, Mr. Critical, God, etc. are using these demanding words, like “must,” “never,” “always,” etc., but how much more free and open-minded they are by using words like “want,” “like,” “rather,” “sometimes,” etc.  That’s right, a prisoner could better think “I prefer to go back to my cell now,” while the guard is demanding it.  So, it can be used anywhere.  However, Israel should not just tell themselves they “prefer” to not kill any more innocent people in Gaza, they should say they “prefer” to not have to suffer equally in their Afterlives for it.  With no cop-outs in the way, that’d be enough to stop it.

 

Mr. Critical “prefers” to give advice to help the world, Mr. Critical doesn’t “have to.”  And, he would be a lot better off if he didn’t.

 

It’s “an” improvement:

I hope I’m wrong, but I think Barack Obama is going to prove to me that “dumb” overrules “good intentions” by still a very wide margin.  “Consider,” don’t do it but “consider” that the solutions can be found far outside the very pressuring, very agreeable, status-quo, greed originated box, like my economic fairness plan, my unconditional sex/love realization, my never hurt an innocent person fairness, my rationalizations about the ills of church cop-outs, etc.  (Sounds like I just want things to be fair, and the problem is that society really doesn’t know what that is; not because they’re dumb [I’m patronizing] but because they have fallen to past philosophies based on selfish greed, imbedded even into our actual definition of morality, and “trust” way too many people who just have high communication skills.

 

Of course, I don’t know why I’m using logic to express by points.  That’s like trying to make a cat understand logic.  The only time anyone is going to take a look at my thesis is when things get really bad.

 

Why do I always hit the delete button when I start hearing a voicemail message saying: “This is an important message from” [delete], or rapidly send to the trash can a letter that’s envelope informs the same.  What if these really are real important messages?  (What if they are more real entrapments and harassments?)  Hopefully, I won’t get all these people wanting me to switch to their brokerage, their insurance, their credit card, etc. when my economic program becomes fully functional, because there will be so much more money to be made by actually producing something.  Because it’ll sell.  But, today, Circuit City is going out of business, etc.  Now, how’m I gonna tinker with the new gadgets?

 

How strong is the Antichrist:

On June 9, 1999 I mailed out a News Release mainly telling about the corruption of the word “fornication” to thousands of major news and religious leaders.  But today, ten years later, if I interviewed 300 million Americans asking them what “fornication” meant (in the Bible), practically all would say it was sex outside of marriage, between single people.  I have since heard about the word “virgin” being a lie, which I exposed in the same flyer, because that truth is not really that much of a threat.  So, just in case anyone wants to start working on better solutions to our problems (that you are not smart enough to automatically know), I suggest circumventing the few major strongholds, not by “just” talking about how honest we are, but by actually allowing honesty to overrule the largest lie ever.  It could very well simply be that “dumb” is the real reason, where “trust” in the Antichrist (today’s church) is so overpowering that no one has ever investigated it (the real definition of fornication).

 

Mr. Critical – You-in’s better-has do it all!

 

TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):

http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/