**** THE RICH AND THE POOR ****
[Acts 20:35] "... It is more blessed to give than to receive."
[Ps 41:1] "Blessed is he who considers the poor."
[Prov 21:13] "Whoever shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, will also cry himself and not be heard (in the afterlife)."
[Rev 13:10] "He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity (in the afterlife)."
[1 Tim 6:8-19] "... those who desire to be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and harmful lusts which drown men in destruction and perdition. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, ... flee these things and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness. Fight the good fight ... Let them do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to give, willing to share, storing up for themselves a good foundation for the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life."
[Matt 6:19,20] "Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal."
[Mark 8:36] "For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole
world, and loses his own soul?"
[Matt 25:44,45] "Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger of naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You? Then He answered them saying, 'Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did not do it to Me."
[Luke 14:13,14] "But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind.—And you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you; for you shall be repaid at the resurrection of the just."
[Luke 4:5-8; Matt 4:8-11; Mark 1:13]—The Devil conceded and revealed to Jesus that he (the Devil) is the essence of, and has control of, all of the wealth and power in the world; and gives it to those who best serve the Devil—just partly true.
Many wealthy people believe that their selfish wealth is given to them by God. But, I tell you that neither God nor the Devil can guarantee earthly material/financial rewards. Earthly material/financial wealth is obtained only by hard work, being at the right place at the right time, and/or just by luck.—You're "lucky" if your smart, attractive, healthy, had a financial head start, and motivated (by your environment) to achieve. Even "hard work" doesn't guarantee success (or "fair" success), in this society, because if you're an "unlucky" hard worker, you will fail. [Matt 13:3-23; Mark 4:3-9,19; Luke 8:5-8,14] shows that neither God (nor the Devil) can directly determine earthly fate—it all has to do with "luck." Therefore, just because you are wealthy does not mean that you are Godly; however, if you are wealthy, you can become more Godly, the more you "sacrifice" (give) your money to the poor (the dumb; the unattractive; the sick; the poor from the start; the downcast, the impoverished, the undervalued—the original followers of Jesus). And you always become better with God the "more" that you give. For a person that gives "half" of what they own to the poor, is very Godly; but a person that gives "all" they own to the poor, is even more Godly ("perfect"). [Luke 12:33]: "Sell what you have and give alms (charity/money to the poor); ...." [Luke 11:39-41]: "... But rather give alms (charity/money to the poor) of such things as you have; then indeed (completely) all things are clean to you." [Matt 13:44]: "... sells all that he has and buys that field (the kingdom of heaven)." [Matt 13:45,46]: "... sold all that he had and bought it (the kingdom of heaven\pearl). [Matt 19:21]: "... If you want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven (not earth) ..." [Mark 10:21]: "... sell whatever you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasures in heaven (not earth) ..." [Luke 18:22]: "... Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven (not earth) ..." Many people believe that it makes no difference to God how much you give to the poor, but it does; because, the more you give to the poor, in this life, the more those same poor people will equally reward you in the afterlife. When you do a good deed and/or give to the poor, you might not be able to totally see (or feel) your reward nearly as clear as you (and all others in heaven) will in the afterlife; simply because your five senses are in dominant control, of your body (and mind); and are the only detectors hooked up to your individual body; and during your life, your five senses (and selfish thoughts) block-out most all outside spiritual activity, especially when you are awake.
Of course, if you totally advocate the Devil by being shrewd and cunning when you sin, and you can deceive the right people, then the chances of financial success is better. But the Devil cannot "guarantee" it, because if you get caught, or noticed, you could lose it all. And, of course, if you started out at (or near) the top, then the chances of staying their are much greater, unless you are very unlucky or a goof. But the "unique" (rare) success stories that we all hear, now and then, are about the people that start at the bottom, and end up at the top. That's why we hear about them, because they are "unique"—they don't happen often.
— SATAN — As instructed by Christ, I admit that I'm a sinner. I've met a lot of Christians (good followers) but I've never met anybody as "perfect" as Jesus Christ, in the eyes of God. To be as "perfect" as Jesus you would have to go to extremes, such as "selling all that you own, and give it all to the poor." Then preach original Christianity the rest of your life, and/or work as many of the most difficult and/or laborious (Godly) jobs needed, in the world, then continue to give as much as possible to the "not so motivated" victims of society.—I sure can't do all of this, but at least I verbally admit it. The reason that Jesus wants us to know the extreme Godly perfection ways, is so that we all will admit (verbally) that we are not perfect, and verbally admitting (and preaching) what we are constantly lacking. Jesus is like the ideal "goal," that none of us can reach, but something that we should always strive for. Therefore, I, and even the most righteous (but not perfect), in today's world, will suffer (somewhat) in their judgment afterlife.
The biggest danger is when our minds believe that we are Godly "perfect" (as our wealthy Christians do). Satan can control their minds easier, which causes them to "not notice" (or justify) the natural sins that they do daily.—Satan works best when you don't know he's there. If Satan was obvious (e.g. The Exorcist movie) then he could only do (some, but) minimal damage, because everybody would be able to (easily) see (or pinpoint) that "there's the Devil" (inside the young girl, possessed in the movie); so then they can easily avoid Satan's suggestions and/or acts. But that's not the way it really works; but Satan would like you to think that that's the way it works, so that you won't know where he really is—he's in you, and all of us individually, to varying degrees, during our entire lifetime. Even Jesus, himself, continually conveyed that the Satan (mostly in others) was constantly tempting him. Nobody can do multitudes of damage, in this world, if they say that they are Satan, because everybody would avoid them and/or be cautious of them. Jesus made himself as a model of a perfect "never reaching human goal" for us to continually strive for; so that society, as a whole, will slowly "adjust" closer to perfection, as the generations continue.
Satan (himself) is like a "lost sheep" that when found, Satan (himself) will realize his evil, and he will actually change for the good.—This will be the only way that (the evil parts of) Satan will eventually die.—As soon as everybody realizes that "covetous selfishness" (Satan) is not best for the world, as a whole.
Note: I will use the word(s) "Satan," "the Devil," "the Beast," "the Antichrist," "God," etc. conveying single entities to more easily (and more accurately) concur with the limited modern day communications (and definitions); but these pre-defined "entities" are technically much more multiple (or a single "whole" of many) complex relations. Like when I refer to God as "He," I am not saying that God is a male person. I just use the word "God" or "He," etc. as a "base" from which to elaborate on, to conform with what the world defines as "God" or "He," etc. Similarly, I will use the brief word of "Satan" instead of having to in-depthly explain, every time, the "who, what, when, where, why, and how," that is "Satan."
If Jesus was here today, and all churches made Him master, He would sell all of the frilly objects in all the churches, and give all proceeds to the starving, the homeless, etc.; until a time that all people of the world were properly fed and housed, etc. In an unfair world, no church could be a "perfect" church of Jesus Christ unless it had a dirt floor; because, as long as there are people, in the world, that must live on dirt floors, Jesus would continue to toil for their importance.
If the actual physical and mental being of Jesus Christ came back to life for "His second coming," then He would much more strongly, then This Paper, "tell" the rich to give all they have to the poor, etc. This Paper is not "telling" the rich to do that, because This Paper would lose; This Paper is just "telling" them what Jesus said. This Paper is only watering a seed that will be manifested (or standardized) by the "future" generations (people not born yet); so current day rich people won't have to "worry" about it so much; so to not oppose it so harshly [Rev 22:11]. But the rich people say that if they allow This Paper for future generations, then that would be an acknowledgment (admitting, confessing, endorsing, recognizing, etc.) of their selfish sins; and consequently, they will have no "excuse" of ignorance, in their afterlife judgment.—But I tell you that God knows that they are thinking this, and that it will be better, in their afterlife judgment, for them to at least recognize their selfish sins, rather than trying to cover them up; simply because covering them up will make it worse for the future generations. If the rich Christians truly knew the real Jesus, but were still selfish, they would "pray to God" that Jesus would NOT come back and take control of the world, with His "second coming"; because He would take all their selfish riches and give it to the poor; until all the world was equally (or in fairness) as rich!
Some people have tried to convince Me that the poor, are poor because they are sinners—irresponsible, users, freeloaders, etc.—not "cheated victims" of society. And that the real "cheated victims" are the rich, because the rich have to pay welfare to those irresponsible poor people. ... If that's the case, then it's easy for Me to request to God to please make Me a "cheated victim"—a rich person.
Jesus was much more of an advocate for the poor, then the rich, because poor peoples' truthful screams (and suffering cries) are quit a bit louder from God's (and the Spirit World's) point of view. Why I added the word "truthful" to "screams" is because a lot of rich people create all kinds of "screams" that are based on dishonesty and/or covetous greed—especially now-a-days, when the rich have greater control of the media. "Early Christians were favored most by the poor and the slaves." "Early Christians were against wealth; and amazingly, when they earned too much, they would give it to the poor." "Early Christians accepted all races." [Acts 10:38]: "... Jesus ... went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil (the rich) ..."
The true definition of the holy word "sacrifice" is "giving" to the poor, with no earthly return!—not the "stupid," unnecessary, and Satanic death of a human or animal. For those of you that are still having trouble understanding all this: The main reason why the rich should give "more" to the poor, than the other way around, is because the rich have (monopolize) "more" (money, possessions, and agency) to give.
If you read even the modern day Bible, you will see that Jesus was a strong advocate for the poor and needy, without condemning judgment against them. But our modern day churches seem to be advocated more by the rich, simply because the "Antichrist" (advocates for the rich) have been in charge of our churches for hundreds of years. They have "sold their souls to the Devil," for money and society acceptance. Churches now-a-days have become nothing more then a cop-out and a justification for rich people to "equal out" their real sins, by just showing up at church and pretending to being Godly. They believe that this will "equal out" their lying sins that they must do daily so to escalate their greedy profits. They sing songs suggesting that God can only see them and any sinful action, only while they are in church, or while they are among other church people. I want to jump up and say something, but I can't; because I must become (temporarily) bias with them, and just mingle in, to clearly educate Myself of what is going on; because My assignment, first, is to, most importantly, learn what it is that people don't know (and/or have been taught/believe in error). Church teachers will say some solid, well known, good statements to help fool you better when they say the one (or more) bad statement(s), that just "sounds good," that will cause "indirect" havoc on the poor and unlucky of society.—In comparison, these selfish, ignorant and corrupted "errors" dwarfs out their "acknowledging of the poor" pertaining to the "small" (one-sided) amounts of aid they donate "directly" to the poor; but, yes, is "something."—And Jesus would say that something is better than nothing. But, if the rich people, that go to church today, only knew how much Jesus condemned the rich, and how He made "the truth burn," they would crucify Him today; just so to "shut Him up." Instead, they say that "He died for (to justify) our sins."—No, He "lived" so that the rich might give more to the poor, via continued teachings.—And to date, it's not even near fulfillment. He "died" because the rich wanted to stop His teachings, against the rich. And the rich continued killing Christians for nearly 300 years after. As a matter of fact, eventually, Jesus could/would have done what I am now doing if everybody would have followed Him, instead of crucifying Him [Rev 5:6—"been slain"]. As a result, Jesus did not say everything: [John 16:12-15,25]: "I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. .... These things I have spoken to you in figurative language; but the time is coming when I will no longer speak to you in figurative language, but I will tell you plainly about the Father. [John 14:25,26]: "These things I have spoken to you while being present with you. But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you." But I cannot see though walls any better than you. In the afterlife, do you really believe that God is going to do more for those who use cop-outs to justify their sins, rather than for the sinned victims? I tell you that people that use the church, the Bible, their prayers, as cop-outs, to justify their sins, are going to suffer even worse, in their afterlife, then ones with no religion at all. If I (a human being) am smart enough to know about these lies, even the ones where you lie to (fool) yourselves, don't you think that God will be smart enough to know them also? When you start believing in religious fairy-tails and miracles, you lose a lot of stability in the true definition of right and wrong; which thence, causes a lot more sin. Rich people are always going to be the worst sinners by looking for as many cop-outs as they can get, so to ease their conscience about not sharing it more with the poor. But I tell you, what is, is, in the afterlife, regardless of what everybody says or believes. If religion is just translated as a cop-out excuse only to justify their sins, then why even have religion at all?—Oh, I forgot ... I'm wrong; religion is also used as an excellent "brainwash" tool to serve the rich. Rich people using Jesus' name as a cop-out, are trying to escape from their Biblically promised "pool of fire," in their afterlife.—They are the one last thrust of Satan's arm before he goes down for the last time. Don't believe that I am loved so great with the poor, either; they use religion as a cop-out as well, but not near as much as the rich. Even paralyzed people in wheelchairs have absolutely no right to hurt "innocent" people. Afterlife rewards will be equally given to the charitable rich for every portion that they do give to the poor, even though it can be very easy for them to do so; however, none of it justifies (or balances out) their other sins/cover-ups.
— RESOURCE MONOPOLIZATION — [Matt 8:20 & Luke 9:58]: "And Jesus said to him, 'Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head.'" [Matt 6:26 & Luke 12:24]: "Look at the birds of the air, for they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value (smarter) than they?" Jesus spoke in the Bible of how God provides for the birds, etc.; but cannot provide for man, because the lucky and powerful man monopolizes all of man's resources for selfish (Satanic) gain and selfish pride. Therefore, nobody can just go out and live naturally because all good land and resources are "owned" and selfishly not shared (stolen) from nature by somebody.—Hence, this is why you are told to not have sex until marriage, because the selfish monopolizers would have to share "back" their "stolen" natural resources as payment for the care of the unwed mothers and their baby(s), which bothers their selfish pride. You see, the monopolizers' "emotions" for the welfare of a baby is just one bit stronger then their emotional desire and pride to monopolize (steal) ALL for themselves. Otherwise, humans would have been extinct many years ago.
All people should "naturally" have enough food, sex, and air. When any (and all) of us "work," we should be accomplishing (fairly) for each other ABOVE that (free food, sex, and air). But the way the current system works many people have to work (slave) for the benefit of the rich, just so to make "ends meet" (for food, sex, and air).—Wait a minute, I'm not totally correct, "air" is they only thing that the rich have not been able to monopolize yet, so to force others to have to do work just to get it (air) back. But if nothing changes soon, and then if/when they (the lucky rich and powerful) can figure out a way to monopolize the air (for profit) THEY WILL.
When Ronald Reagan said that "America is great," he insinuated (and insulted) other countries by saying that they are not great. [Absolutely no modesty there]. God sees and feels for the entire world (and universe), not just your country, state, city, neighborhood, family, or just you. Therefore, if your conservative life seems pretty good, from your point of view, I assure you that there is still a lot of pain and suffering going on in the rest of the world/country, that needs your help—that is, if you really want to help God and the Spirit World. Any religious person that thinks, "yep, everything is just great the way it is," is a person that is very ignorant to the pain and suffering of the poor and needy. And, a lot of the rich (and middle class) could be even happier if they were not led to "covet" for more, and/or led to think "evil" about the poor.
Politically speaking, I am a republican in a very honest way: I expect perfection from those that are being paid to be honest and perfect.—Like all politicians; all law enforcers; all religious leaders/teachers; and anybody else that is paid to do something right, which could include just about everybody that has a job. I don't expect true victims of society to be perfect. However, I am also a democrat, because they, sort of, more recognize the poor as victims.
— A JESUS LIKE PARABLE — If there are six (6) shirts available for two (2) men. And one man has five (5) of the shirts, and the other man has none (0); who should the sixth shirt go to? Whoever voted for Bob Dole would believe that the sixth shirt should go to the man with the five shirts. But Jesus Christ would say that the sixth shirt should go to the man that has no shirt. Everyone agree?
— AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS — Stingy wealthy people are the real causers of many automobile accidents. Wealthy drivers don't need to "speed," because they don't need to get there any faster—they've got plenty of time. But people that are motivated by (slaves of) the wealthy, have to work harder and faster to compete, just to make ends meet.—They are the ones that must "speed" to get things done faster. It's sometimes a "do or die" situation. Example: a salesman that "speeds" between customers can make more calls than a salesmen that doesn't; overall, he will make a little more money; which also increases his competitive job security. Same for deliveries, service calls, etc. All this "pressure motivation" also promotes tailgating; which is trying to get somebody to speed up, while the police radar, down the road, is trying to get them to slow down; and drive like wealthy people.—As a driver, I have found, it is impossible to please everybody.
— CIGARETTE SMOKERS — Since cigarette smoking is now attributed to health problems (cancer, etc.) most rich (and/or lucky) people find little reason to smoke anymore. Instead, they will entertain themselves by provoking mental damage to the poor (and victims of society) that still smoke, because of the fact that cigarette smoking is another temporary relief from the poor peoples' "living hell" placed on them by the rich, to serve the rich. Therefore, not only are the rich people now the cause of the smokers' health problems, but they are actually "rubbing more salt in their wounds" by criticizing (or discriminating against) smokers—which is mental abuse, which can cause even more health problems, which may cause them to need to smoke even more, or maybe just lead them to drugs, crime, and/or suicide.
There are a lot of problems that rich people like to blame on the poor and unlucky, that are actually caused by the rich peoples' not giving (sharing) enough to the poor and needy. Rich people can listen to Me now, or wait for the Light-of-Truth to tell them in their afterlife.
— SYMPATHY FOR THE RICH — Most people know that the key to success is always coveting for more, more, more, ... money. Therefore, you live your entire life hurting others and hurting yourself.—You ask: "How am I hurting myself?" [If instead, you are asking "how am I hurting others?" then just go to the end of this chapter, you don't need to read anymore; you're okay]. The game of extremes—win or lose. When you finally get what you covet then: "boy, it feels great;" then slowly doesn't feel so great anymore, after little bits of time to "back to a normal feeling." But when you "lose" and don't get what you covet, then you're depressed until that wears off "back to a normal feeling." Analyze this yourself, the next time you experience both of these feelings. You may find that the Devil feeling (the depression) far exceeds the "feels great" feeling as an overall comparison. Or, just ask rich people what they suffer from the most, and they will tell you: "depression." The answer to your problem is: "don't do anything that hurts any innocent person."—Hard thing to do in this very competitive world, right? But the more you practice this secret, the more your depression will go down; so you can be happy(ier) and health(ier).
— DESTRUCTION OF THE MIND — Because of selfish human nature, some rich people are critical, sarcastic; and ridicule, mock, depress, defame, declass, slander, degrade, badger, disgrace, embarrass, humiliate, and harass the poor and unlucky; in a very aggressive, derogatory, and breaking manor. Rich people's put-downs, to the poor and unlucky, can cause a lot of irreversible damage to the poor and unlucky people's minds; when they are wrongfully (did not hurt an innocent person) put-down. Being human, and therefore limited in intelligence, the poor and unlucky's subconsciouses will actually "believe" the put-downs; and therefore, their minds will continually scan for the Godly "fair" reason that they are being put-down for. It's like how a person might touch the water in a swimming pool, to test the temperature, before they dive in; a human mind, that has wrongfully been put-down (especially ones that have been put-down a lot) will constantly be testing every thought and impulse their mind receives and, consequently, will slow their mind down so much that it will hamper their learning, thinking, and memory abilities. They will appear slow and stupid because their mind tests every thought and feeling because it has been (wrongfully) educated that "something is wrong" that their truthful conscience cannot "see" as being wrong (by the selfish and ignorant putdowns). It's like a computer that only has 16 megabytes of RAM.—If all that random memory is boggled up with a bunch of junk, there will be no space left for a new (possibly more important) program. Therefore, since their subconscious has been instructed that it is in error and doesn't know why, it will be constantly testing and re-evaluating every new intake it receives, searching for the error(s). Only when the subconscious recognizes how it "hurt an innocent person," is when it can conclude it's search. On the other hand, "guilty" people (both rich and poor) that won't admit that they are wrong (scared of God), will then begin "dishonest justification" of how that "innocent" person(s) somehow otherwise deserved it—which will slander and hurt that "innocent" person(s) even more. It can become a vicious circle, that can escalate to world war.
— CHARITABLE DEEDS — Charity is synonymous with the word "love," according to Jesus. I, personally, have given a lot to charities, that's what makes Me "better" than other people.—Especially in the eyes of the poor; all honest humans; and, most of all—God.
[Matt 6:1-6] This is an excellent example of a "sounds good" trick of the Antichrist. It states that you should not brag about your charitable deeds; and instead, do them in secret, so nobody will know. But I tell you, charitable deeds is the most important thing to brag about. Because: (1) It prompts/promotes others into doing the same. (2) It educates others into knowing that it is the thing to do. (3) It will bring, at least, some kind of an earthly "reward" for the giver, so to prompt him/her to do it again/more. ...Hey, this could even help the rich, get richer; because it could reduce welfare tax. It's whatever causes the charity to be made, that is important. And keeping it silent will only keep it from being fulfilled even more. You see, the "global" result of the deed is the determining factor, in analyzing if scripture is true Christ or Antichrist; because God sees and feels for the entire world equally and fairly; which includes, but is not limited to, the hypocrites. "Beware of the Antichrist," said Jesus. When Jesus was alive, he was constantly correcting his disciples. And [Matt 26:31-35; Mark 14:27-31; Luke 22:31-34; John 13:37,38]—Before Jesus left His disciples, for the final time, He tried to let them know that they "will be made to stumble," by "Satan"; and not only "this night" [Matt 26:31], but "even this night" [Mark 14:30].—The very important point here is that, if Satan can confuse a disciple, think what he could easily do to you! The disciples were not Jesus, they were just inspired by Jesus; and "to error is human," and the Bible was written by "humans," not by God or Jesus. We just hope that it's as factual as possible; and anyone (in 1997) that says for sure that the Bible is without error, is a liar—because how could they authentically know "for sure"? And, since Jesus was alive (a living human), God must also make it know, not to be revealed until this time (the next chapter), that even Jesus Himself can be tricked by the Devil. All good deeds should be bragged about, all bad deeds should not; but, in this day and age, the bad deeds, where somebody gets hurt, are the ones that I hear bragged about the most. So "prove" that you're "better" than others by "bragging" about your Godly purpose; and "pride" yourself into doing (sacrificing, contributing, etc.) for others, instead of your "average" common selfish greed and desire. People that work full time, just to meet their essentials, are naturally "better" than the rich, and need not bestow more.
A contradicting verse: [Matt 5:16]: "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven." But, do NOT "brag" about your good "luck."
— CRIME — I don't want to become a-victim-of-a-victim any more than the next guy.—In other words, I don't want to be shopping and get shot witnessing a grocery store holdup, etc. So, I write this accordingly to educate the real causers of crime, with hopes to prevent crime.
Crime (that gets enforced) is caused because the rich and lucky are not willing to share their monopolized luck and good fortune, near as much as they should. The only solution to crime is giving (not taking) beforehand—and most importantly, making them feel good about accepting it. You will never find a better solution. What makes an individual a criminal is how much they've been kicked by society, when their luck is down; to a point that they humanly break. There are levels of mental pain that are millions of times greater than the average person can ever be able to comprehend—simply because they've never been pushed that far. Many people will disagree with Me, but that proves to Me how dangerous people's ignorance really is. Plus, the only way out of their living hell is drugs, crime or suicide (or more money and more advantages). Building more prisons is just going to escalate the problem, to where all the work force is in prison. Therefore, rich peoples' selfishness and badgering is the real evil and creators of crime. If you release every poor person from jail (or prison), and give each a million dollars, a good spouse, and six months; they would not be committing crime any more; because they would be too busy wandering what color to paint their new house, or what itinerary they want on their next cruise, etc.
"Poverty" and "lack of advantages" does not cause crime, but it strongly contributes to it. The laws of the land are mostly written, and enforced, against the wrongful "tendencies" of the poor and unlucky; with minimal laws written against the wrongful "tendencies" of the rich and lucky. Mainly because the rich and lucky are the ones that write the laws; and therefore, they write the laws, and standards, that best suit themselves. With this bias, even honest psychologists have a difficult time logically convincing criminals of the "fairness," that criminals require, to rehabilitate themselves. There's a difference between the words "rehabilitate" and "brainwash." All criminals can be corrected if they are "honestly" rehabilitated. But most of them are naturally smart enough to see through the bias brainwashing, which just makes things worse. Especially, when the law enforcers show the criminals that it's okay for them (the law enforcers) to break the rules (right or wrong), but it is not okay for the criminals to break the rules (right or wrong). Schools and churches try to brainwash lots of this unfairness. Society (in general) will condemn anybody that does not follow their chosen "brainwash."
The alternating bias methods of our current legal system, defines "the reason why somebody committed a crime" in two opposite ways: (1) "Motive"; which is used "against" the criminal. (2) "Justification"; which is used "for" the criminal.—All of which can be the exact same crime. It all depends on your gender; your race; your age; your intelligence/education; your sex appeal (attractiveness); your wealth; but, most by if you are (or are not) a "smart ass." Because a judge, lawyer, or cop proving/exercising his "emotional" "power" over his "smart ass" enemies is his/her number one (#1) priority. Pleasing his/her boss, doing his/her job, being honest, etc. would come in later. Police that redundantly beat people for resisting arrest are not doing it for the good of the community, they are doing it for their personal entertainment. For example: A person being arrested for jaywalking that becomes too much of a "smart ass" (harsh opinion), or resists arrest; might get the %$*!&Z beat out of him/(but likely not "her"), and/or he/her will be "railroaded" by the system.—But when a ruthless killer gets arrested, he/her will not be beaten and/or railroaded, as long as he/she didn't anger them or resist arrest—then they will just do their job. It will naturally make criminals worse (and feel more justified to do it again) when the system people show the criminal that it is okay for the system people to break the laws, while they are proclaiming that it is not okay for the criminal to break the laws.—Many system people do this just for entertainment, and/or to cover-up their own mistakes/lies. Many rich people believe that when they beat, wrong, or torture a person, and if that person fights back, screams, or complains about it at all, then that person is evil and/or mentally ill.—They really believe that. [You see, this is the kind of intelligence that I've got to deal with (to correct)—it isn't easy, especially when I'm dealing with people that lie to themselves—first I must learn exactly what it is that others don't know (or understand), and then elaborate from there].
Basically, "criminal" laws are laws geared against blue collar crime (or wrongful tendencies of the poor), and "civil" laws are (generally) the ones geared against white collar crimes (or wrongful tendencies of the rich). Usually criminal laws lead toward torturous jail time, etc., because poor people don't usually have the money to pay the restitution; and civil laws can lead to, at worst, just paying money for restitution; so to guarantee, condone and/or encourage the rich man's white collar crime (wrongs); because of "minor" (non-torturous) consequences if caught. Blue-collar crime is wrong, but usually can, at best, just ruin the lives of a few people at a time. White-collar crime is not near so obvious, but can (indirectly) ruin the lives of thousands. So which is worse in the eyes of God? For those of you that do not already know this: Most people in jail and prison are poor people. Most rich and lucky people, with less than average intelligence, have not the slightest idea why people commit crime, take drugs, and/or commit suicide; simply because they have never felt the level of pain that is caused by the extremes of unfairness, cover-ups, and put-downs; inflicted by the selfishness of the rich and powerful. Most rich and powerful people, with above average intelligence, are very secretly evil, and simply could "care less," and believe that building more jails and stiffer penalties (for the poor) is the best answer to cover-up the problem, during their personal lifetime, and to hell with the future. It will always be very difficult for law makers to determine the fair (to correct) severity of a punishment for crimes, when society and religion has no stable or fair definition of right and wrong.—Some true sinners are going to get out of jail earlier then they should, and some "victims of the ignorance," are going to jail for life. Therefore, penalties will keep fluctuating unfairly, up and down, until true sin is fully realized. In essence, the law makers'/enforcers' job is to make things fair, in an unfair world.
A lot of people don't know why other people do the things they do. This is why many people get angry. God, and the Spirits in Heaven, know why everybody does the things they do. And God knows who has justification and who has not, and to what degree. This is why Jesus said: [Matt 7:5 & Luke 6:42]: "... First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother's eye."—This is the ONLY road, for the rich and powerful, to find true criminal rehabilitation.
Most of the extreme, worst, cowardly, cold-blooded, murderous, blue-collar crimes, that you can think of (or know of), after all the truths come down the tube (in the afterlife), everybody will know and realize that the rich, that didn't fairly (adequately and effectively) share their "lucky" wealth, will be found to be the most responsible (the "indirect" cause), and the most accountable. Even the worst criminal mind in the world can "concur" with the logic that hurting an "innocent" person is wrong; whereas other laws will always cause more problem than good, and logical opposition. Therefore, laws where no "innocent" people get hurt, should NOT be laws (like certain drug laws). Once the court system only makes and enforces laws where an "other" ("other" than the "criminal") "innocent" person gets hurt, then the rest is gravy.
— DRUGS — "The war against drugs" will NEVER "win," until rich people decide to fairly share their wealth with the poor. There will ALWAYS be a drug problem, as long as there is such a desperate "need" for drugs; simply because the technology is here, and cannot be turned back.—Just like nuclear weapons. You see, drugs temporarily bring people out of their "living hell," that's placed on them, by the results of the selfishness of the rich.—In many cases, this even includes overly-stressed rich people. The reason certain drugs are illegal is because: (1) They believe that slaves serve and work better if they are unhappy, (2) It's easy for rich people to not "need" drugs, and (3) They don't give the slightest hoot about poor people in living hell. And illegal drugs will continue to be abused until someone can prove how poor peoples' taking drugs will help the "rich get richer"—in addition to all of the expenses caused by the current crimes, law enforcement and prison costs, that illegal drugs cause; versus the expense of an occasional overdose, that would be less if certain drugs were legal; and therefore, had a "warning label." I, personally, (luckily) don't have it that bad, and (luckily) am able to mentally work out My problems; so therefore, I do not take illegal drugs; instead, I "tough" things out.
— STARVATION/MARRIAGE — Because of the resource monopolization of the rich, and because of men that would just leave their pregnant girl friends, I'm sure there were many instances, thousands of years ago, when like a caring person walking down the road, would find a dead woman, with a dead baby in her arms, that both died of starvation. This caring person would righteously argue that "there should not be sex until marriage." But technically, this caring person would be confused of the issue, thinking that the father is the sinner rather than the monopolizing rich; because it does take a thinking process; so therefore, the vast majority ain't gonna get (or see) it. But I tell you, the afterlife will show to the lying (to themselves) covetous rich (and every other soul), how their (the rich) selfishness caused this, instead of the natural father, that did his pre-programmed "Godly pressured" job (to have sex with a variety of women). The premise of marriage is just a community enforced financial obligation of the man, to pay for the support of the woman and any (and all) children she bares. But, again, the reason (or "premise") of this "marriage" is not because of God's requirement, but because of the sinfully selfish, wealthy humans' resource monopolization ("stealing"). Whereas the "birds" don't have these kind of resource problems (said Jesus). In the age of sensible birth control, "marriage" actually becomes a total religious sin.
People are very good at seeing and trying to solve very evident and obvious problems—like when there's a fire, everybody knows real quick that the fire should be put out; and that's good.—But if it is not that apparent, by it taking a two or three step thinking process, most people aren't gonna get it.—Like if the fire was started by a criminal poor person jealous of their spouse, because of (1) the system people showing that breaking the rules is okay if you have "the power" to get away with it, (2) the poor people's breaking motivational pressures (from the rich), (3) the co-dependency of monogamous marriage; nope, that's too many thinking steps to prevent the "real" reason for an arson/crime; thus, there will be nothing to prevent it (and other problems) from happening again, until ....
-- Index --