Subject: Sucking up to the man
That’s what our media is doing when they don’t mention the word “Amiriyah” every time they mention the word “9/11” or “Iraq” or “Saddam Hussein” or “bin Laden,” etc. And, that’s not only why we have these problems, but it is why they are going to continue. Proper education / awareness to the American public would likely change all that, as American warmonger’s arguments would lack all ethics and fairness, and would put war back where it should be: only for the most cowardice, unfair and selfish Americans. Being President is also like being a media informant to the American public.
1-12-09
The media isn’t keeping the public dumb just because they like keeping the public dumb. You know it’s going on also on the other sides, so we should try to be “better” by fully stating “why” bad things are happening to us. You see, the more the media cops-out in their duty, the more the American people will believe we are in right; and the more we believe we’re in the right, the more we’ll gripe to our President to do something about it; and the more pressure he gets to do something about it, the more likely he will.
And “Amiriyah” was just “one” atrocity I happened to hear about, watching CNN late one night in 1991, then never again. So who knows what other valid justifications others have against Americans.
You’re all basically 99% what you’ve been taught:
Everything you thing and do all day relates to what you’ve been taught. Whether it’s about the meat you eat, to what you’ve been taught that God is all about, to desiring only one mate, to you’re belief against those who don’t work, to dying in the battlefield – it all has to do with what you’ve been taught. The remaining 1% is your thinking outside the box floating just above that threshold, which still has to eventually meet with the standards you’ve been overwhelmingly taught (some get to second base). The only logic you exhibit is still overwhelmingly based on those teachings. People who fall short of that line (who realize further) can only be either victims of those taught standards, or people who seek their own desires. Well, people who seek their own desires more than less just deviate in ways that hurts others; so, a victim of taught standards is the only more credible source. And the vast majority of successful politicians, media and religious leaders are the ones who have been victimized the least, therefore the least likely to pursue change. And none of you know it. That’s why I’m telling you. But, don’t even try to understand it… because again, you can only if you’re a victim (or self-seeking).
Whatever works.
The auto bailout:
I remember all the cool people in the 1960s and 1970s were the guys who worked on their own cars. They could really attract the chicks. They were the real manly men. I remember Burt Reynolds type movies centered around driving the cool cars of the big three. Long discussions in Sambo’s debating which car manufacturer was better. Muscle cars like Z-28, Cuda, Carter’s Vet, etc. Racing down Metcalf. And, at the top of all that’s cool were the motorwagon manufacturers themselves. I can’t believe they’re folding up.
When your anger gets in the way of hurting innocent people, then you need to take Jesus’ advice:
You see, “dumb” is the main reason:
Here, use this:
“Come on in, boys”:
Well, if you can’t talk about the Amiriyah civilian shelter, maybe you can at least do a story about Old West Madam Etta Clark and worker Bessie Colvin.
It wouldn’t surprise me one bit, if Barack Obama had never heard about the Amiriyah civilian shelter. And tell him that’s just one incident I heard about late one night on CNN back in 1991, and I didn’t even watch the news much back then. “Possibly” he’ll say (to himself): Oh… I now see why we have these terrorism problems.
Concerning my economic advice:
“You may be wrong; but, you may be right.” –Billy Joel, 1980. Well, that’s nice to know that at least Billy Joel is giving me some credence. And for him to say this in 1980 is pretty incredible.
I’m not hearin’ anything on the news about the big Mr. Critical economic plan:
So, you all be sure to pay your income taxes on time this Spring… so I can later call ya’ all “dumb.” That’s right: write that big check. See it gone from your next bank statement… then sit back and “think” you’re smart. Heh, heh, heh, heh. Go ahead, I’m watching.
Cavuto, O’Reilly, Porky Pig – I guess they’re all “smarter” than me. I’ll just keep repeating that.
You all need to implement my economic advice soon, or I may rescind the offer.
The O.J. judge stated on the record that the elements of the case had nothing to do with the 1995 acquittal:
I thought for sure it did! Well, I guess I was wrong. Shucks, what else could I be wrong about? It might be a good thing to not listen to me, as I am apparently mistake prone. The judge said, to paraphrase, that such would be a great disrespect for the laws and our system, as it would be something that could lead our society into chaos. Okay, I’m learning now. So, with that:
Many times the police are the real criminals:
O.J. said he first contacted the police reporting the location of his stolen merchandise, and the police did nothing. If I was harboring stolen merchandise, say from the mayor of Olathe, trying to sell it on the Internet, and he knew it was in my house, the cops would be over here lickety-split with a search warrant, confiscating it, and I’d be cuffed and stuffed before the end of the day – rightfully. If the cops didn’t, the mayor would be totally justified in the eyes of fairness to retrieving it himself, by any means necessary! And maybe kick my ass to boot (or, with his boot).
But, it’s good to know that the cops wouldn’t have their guns out if they were raiding me in a hotel room; because, they could accidentally shoot an innocent tourist walking down the hall or something.
Conversely, if someone stole something valuable from me, then they’re like standing there holding it, smiling like there’s nothing I can do to get it back. I’d… I’d… say “okay” and go home.
You see, when we spin the system to nail someone we don’t like, that just leads to any police officer, court, etc. to railroad whoever they “wish.” If that’s the way it “should” be, then why have courts at all? Why not just have each police officer or judge do whatever they want, based on the same: whatever they want. Most will tell me: they do. Then why do we have to mislead the public into thinking that they don’t? Is there a reason? Most judges and police officers would disagree with me, but I think they all have a very high degree of favoritism. And I think all of them would railroad a person before they’d admit an error. The law against real kidnapping should have stiff penalties; but, practically all laws are written to be mitigated when circumstances differ from the worst case scenario. And being justified to get your stolen property back, especially after the police won’t help you, is not only a very good reason to mitigate O.J.’s case, but to throw it out completely, and actually blame the police for dereliction of duty. Giving O.J. the same penalty as if he kidnapped (took away and hid) someone’s kid (and, not his kid), is a complete insult to our entire system of laws, and will lead to very ignorant people who think they know it all, to do whatever they want, making the Nicole / Goldman murders look like nothing. I just wonder how many millions of people are in prison because we didn’t implement my economic (fairness) system years ago. Let God judge O.J. and hope He doesn’t judge the dishonesty of all our “honorable” justices. But, if a justice has ever ignored a law or dwelled on a technicality to make something worse than it really is, then I’d guess they are in big trouble as God will nitpick technicalities and ignore some laws the same with them.
If you’re a judge, mitigate when the circumstances merit, not just because the defendant is a police officer, like you’re the Kansas Supreme Court. True trash like that aren’t worth the fertilizer they waste down the toilet every day. They’ll find out in their Afterlives. It’ll be a BIG surprise.
The National Guard is now using a new song:
“When there are people crying in the streets, when they’re starving for a meal to eat, when they simply need a place to make their beds, right here underneath my wing, you can rest your head.” –3 Doors Down, 2008.
Sounds more appropriate for my economic advice than anything else. Well, it’s just good to know that “I” only have the real superior moral and right solution, that only hypocritical warmongers like to brag about. “I” only am the real hero. I’m the greatest wonder of wonder. Not the government or warmongers. That’s because I speak on the Lewis and Clark journals, and they don’t. – That’s the only kind of thing that’s going to make the difference.
How we will be judged in the Afterlife:
God hears the pains and complaints of the rich and lucky: The disgruntlement when things don’t work out perfect every time. – Accidents, health problems, love life problems, job problems, etc. But, the thing that, by far, echoes the greatest discomfort is the complaint of being treated unfairly. And, that’s the one thing that can definitely be attributed to another person. Unfairness will never be allowed in the Kingdom of Heaven. Therefore, guys like Hannity will have to first feel all the same unfair suffering that they caused / supported, before they can enter.
George will tell God that he was justified in killing Saddam Hussein because he killed innocent people during wartime. That will now make it very easy for God to explain to everyone why George deserves the same.
My goal:
My goal is to someday be like a normal person powered only by the influence of my surroundings. Then I won’t have to think, just react.
Barack Obama:
Actress Kristen Stewart looks like your mother.
Illinois Governor thinks he’s Nixon:
Jiminy Christmas! Blagojevich’s defense: I’m saying that when the Governor does it, that means it’s not illegal. Actually, Blagojevich’s real defense should be: All other politicians are corrupt, make underhanded deals, doctor up legal documents, etc. – it’s a well known and accepted fact. So, why are you all picking on me? Warren Jeffs would probably answer: It all has to do with who did what to who. Right dad? And mainly, the public assumes / trusts that all other politicians must be honorable, simply because higher authorities aren’t arresting them. The news media is even too dumb to know anything. Otherwise, why didn’t the media first reveal the governor’s corruption? I mean, he’d been doing this kind of stuff for quite a while I (now) hear. Why didn’t O’Reilly bring him down? It’s because everyone is a moron, one way or the other. Everyone is far to dumb to know what’s good for this country.
Blagojevich’s approval rate has now been reduced to 8%. So, the people must not want these types running our government. Of course that entirely has to do with trusting someone of influence. That is, if someone else is just as corrupt or worse, few will realize it until someone of trust says it. The people may have full knowledge of the crime, but few think it’s bad until someone influential tells them. President Bush is worse than Blagojevich, but few realize it. So, these people of trust run things a lot more than they may even realize.
Other governors are probably asking: Do we have to stop our corruptions now too? The Feds will answer: No, no, no! Just don’t anger us, and you’ll be alright. And, you’re totally covered as Jesus paid the penalty for your sins. (Well, they’ll probably paying someone at church to tell ‘em that last sentence.)
Hey, if President Bush can so gracefully duck a flying shoe, then maybe he can gracefully expose all the corruption in this country on his last day in office. Nobody would be out to kill him, like they did Kennedy and Pope John Paul I, because the next day he’d have no more power. All he has to do is try to be as honorable as Sarah Palin. Heck, give it a try. Because, waiting for the church to solve these kinds of problems is not in the near future. If the Dallas drive was on President Kennedy’s last day in office, no one would have killed him, because real (the worst) criminals don’t seek revenge near as much as does a future threat to their continued corruption. It’s like how all the arrested real criminals are the ones who treat the police and system people the kindest; where someone who’s being railroaded, arrested on frivolous charges, or in unfairness will tend to complain more; thereby getting the more stiffer penalties; whereas the real criminals probably get off, as, again, the system people really do just whatever they “feel” like doing to satisfy their personal emotions. And, enjoying people being subservient to them is probably 99% why they pursued the job.
The chloroform manslaughter:
A great example of how dumb everyone really is. Casey Anthony apparently chloroformed her daughter so she could go out and party, which accidentally killer her. Every other issue after discovering the death is irrelevant (including upsetting Geraldo), as most all of us wouldn’t know what to do, and would try to get out of very excessive criminal penalties. She probably didn’t even know the stuff could kill her daughter, because this has to be the most misinformed country on the planet. “Intent” is the only real “criminal” value, that is, she should only be penalized the same as if she’d have gotten caught before the daughter died. Now, understanding that, takes more than a one-step thinking ability. She’s morally justified in lying to police, because she knew there would be extreme unfairness in her punishment. The Kansas Supreme Court has more evil “intent” than does Casey Anthony, and deserves a far worse penalty. President Clinton and both Bushes had “intent” to kill any civilian for military advantage. All who are walking around free, where Casey Anthony is locked up in jail. Therefore, try to explain to me how we are not so dumb that we really don’t know what can and can’t hurt us. Oh, maybe I should explain that people “with” more evil “intent” should be more taken out of society, than those who have less evil “intent.” You still haven’t got it. Let me show you the pictures of all the innocent civilians President Clinton and both Bushes killed, next to the “accident” (total non-intent) of one. And, that “accident” fact makes a world of difference in that “one.” If I was on Casey Anthony’s jury, I’d let her off with time served. If I was God on President Clinton’s and both Bushes’ Judgment, I’d sentence them to be burned alive thousands of times over, in the Afterlife. Explain to me how all that would not be “fair.” Only the innocent victims (of “intent”) would understand. Everyone “thinks” they are able to think outside the box, but if they think Casey Anthony deserves more than anyone else who chloroformed their daughter without a death, they can’t. Not “won’t” but “can’t.” And, the world desperately needs someone who “can.” And, if there’s “two” then the other one definitely has little influence. This just proves that there’s very likely a tremendous amount of injustice / unfairness in our legal proceedings. So much so, to have God / Jesus advise us to not ever judge others.
Hey, Mr. Critical, you could talk a bit nicer to us while you explain this stuff. But, it wouldn’t “fit” as well.
Plus, if she’s not smart enough to throw the body in an apartment dumpster, then a really low I.Q. can be a defense.
The accidental chloroformed death is what “fits” best, by far. But, the Fox News Channel thinks prosecutors need to go for the death penalty for first degree murder. If she just wanted to kill and dump the kid, she wouldn’t have bothered making the chloroform. Saying that she made the chloroform so authorities could find it to cover for her breaking the little girls neck is what’s called “way too far fetched.” But “way too far fetched” controls a lot of Fox News’ conclusions. If Democrats were in the White House during 9/11, then Fox News would be supporting the “far fetched” conspiracy theories out there that the President was part of the whole thing. “Dumb”: it runs Fox News which influences a lot of Americans. There’s only “one” other choice people have for intelligence, and that’s not themselves, it’s me.
He’s engaged?:
Casey Anthony likely accidentally killed her one (1) daughter. Drew Peterson likely had intent in killing two (2) wives. Of course, since the evidence for both crimes are about the same (circumstantial), Casey’s in jail and Drew’s free, as who did what to who has everything to do with what gets prosecuted in this great country (which proves it’s worth dying for in the battlefield). This also proves that it is a good thing when our “God driven” authorities have to deviate from the written law, to do the right thing. That they all possess Godly abilities to really know right from wrong on each individual case, therefore deserve the public’s and media’s total respect. And they get it (or, nearly; or, sufficiently enough). Anyway, if you’re a living person, wouldn’t you worry a bit about marrying a guy who likely killed two (2) prior wives, and is able to get away with it? “Sexual” based love: it’s “powerful.”
The Washington State Capitol atheist sign:
I obviously don’t agree with the sign either; but, O’Reilly making such a big deal to get rid of it, shows how his types just want to suppress Freedom of Speech. O’Reilly and his types are “dictators.”
The only thing that might make America better than other countries is Freedom of Speech, and O’Reilly has proven he’s for the opposite. I think O’Reilly and Dennis Miller are the kinds who would like to take some of these Free Speech people “out of their houses in the middle of the night.”
Here’s a better way to fight atheists:
“Jesus” told it best (especially against those who say it’d be a better world without religion):
Matthew 22:36-40:
36Master, which is the great commandment in the law? 37Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38This is the first and great commandment. 39The second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Meaning if you don’t believe in and mostly fear God (the first commandment), you’re not going to practice the second; informing atheists who think their way is best for Goldenrule implementation, not believing in God isn’t going to work. So, you can just cause more problems, or you can fight atheism trusting “Jesus” / God.
http://www3.sympatico.ca/lords.word/grtcommand.html, THE GREAT COMMANDMENT(S) (quoted above):
The first 4, of the ten commandments, are covered under the 1st great commandment. The last 6, of the ten commandments, are covered under the 2nd great commandment. Therefore, Jesus completely covered all ten commandments using only two, called great commandments, and silenced the lawyer.
And “Jesus” gave “6” other examples of the Goldenrule in Matthew 25:34-46. I can probably give at least six more. Should I start by telling people to not be like O’Reilly?
“I” say it all in the word Goldenrule alone, but it’s true, if you don’t believe and fear Fair Afterlife Punishment, then it’ll be in vain. So, the main problem is today, most “Christians” do “believe” in God, but thanks to “confession” and (especially) the principal Protestant tenet of “faith alone,” few “fear” God, especially in this country (and all top warmonger countries [like Germany and England]). I’ll betcha all examples the atheists can come up with, about how religion is the cause of many world problems, can all be stemmed from “faith alone” (mainly), “confession” and the human inability to properly implement “eye for eye, tooth for tooth” (which Jesus overruled in Matthew 5:38-42). So it’s not Jesus that’s the problem, it’s the “Antichrist’s” cop-outs and lies that are the problem. “Saving face” / “self pride” (for those who have enough) is an overall reason; that only a fear of God can halt, in the Goldenrule. Everyone today is so dumb that they believe the biggest religious change ever (Apocalypse) will come only via miracle, not my logically correcting taught errors. Especially since no one is smart enough to logically know right from wrong on their own.
You see, if you let (via Freedom of Speech) the atheists say what they want to say, then that will entice people like me to write my more rational argument against it. And if that ever gets disseminated, then that may change the views of all the other atheists, for the better. But, if you let imbeciles like O’Reilly suppress views that he personally doesn’t like, then ignorance (atheism) flourishes and grows behind the scene, for the worse. O’Reilly’s so dumb that he doesn’t even know how to fight the things he wants to win. But, he’s very “educated” and articulate. The main problem may be the overall natural one-step thinking rationale that if they’re articulate they’re smart. So, if things don’t start with the word “dumb,” nothing major is going to get fixed.
Logic dictates that:
O’Reilly is a great example of many dictator / hypocrite Americans: those who shout the most about being “patriotic,” but are the least – as they disrespect Freedom of Speech the most. It’s good for the people to see this great of an example, so to know who really is evil versus who maybe not. Keep up the good work, O’Reilly: The distinguishment is necessary for a better future for Mankind.
You see, “logic” is what made the chair you’re sitting in, the car you drive, etc., not your overwhelming dumb animal emotions. So, logic is what’s going to eventually win.
“The gruesomeness going on over her shoulder”:
Sarah Palin is interviewed with turkeys being slaughtered in the background. Fox News called it an “awkward” seen. Since everyone thinks that it was inappropriate, then we need to try to quit lying to ourselves about the appalling realism of eating meat. I know you’re too smart to think I’m right, but someday, there’ll be laws against animal slaughter. I don’t know if that’ll be before or after the Pope tells the truth about what Jesus really said about sex, marriage, and the family standard. Either way, it’s not going to be in my lifetime. “Dumb”: is a strong and lengthy thing.
http://gxpmall.com/Rules_For_Men.htm, Rules for men to live by:
“5. Unless he murdered someone in your immediate family, you must bail a friend out of jail within 12 hours.”
http://kittywampus.blogspot.com/2008/04/sex-and-penitentials_18.html, Sex and the Penitentials
Helpful flow chart guide in following Middle Age Catholic sexual demands. Once you’ve met the criteria (marriage and for procreation only), then:
John 13:34-35:
You know, when you tell someone you’re dating that you love them, today and yesterday, that means you love them only, and forsake all others. “Love” between non-related adults is communicated as exclusiveness. But Jesus broke this standard by commanding to “love one another.”
High School drop-outs:
I think less people would drop out of school if the things taught were more interesting to the student. I remember having to just read and just study lots of subjects that were not very useful in life. Subjects that were more philosophical, which were more of interest to older adults (or, of young teachers trying to impress us with their abilities of mastering the boring subjects). Take two kids of the same abilities. Have one read and write on boring older adult subjects, and the other on subjects that are useful and gainful to the student’s current life and values. I’ll betcha the more enthused student will be able to read and write better by the time of graduation, and will have much more knowledge about what can and can’t really help them in life. Maybe Discover Channel types of stuff, but leaning toward the student’s basic interests of life. Determining the best general subjects to teach is the challenge, as upon query, the students may not know what they don’t already know, to advise. I know we need lots of courses targeting students’ later enslavement to serve others, but we need to also balance more of that out (training of the mind) with things which can aid the actual person in their more immediate / earlier life (and, earlier adult life). I say a more stable basis will bring a better server later. I realize that our suppressing of the most major subjects (mainly sex) will more deter this process than help. So the bigots have to go, before this kind of process can excel. But, that would be like turning the entire “civilized” world upside-down.
Gruesome details:
News people are appalled by some of the gruesome details about animals that have eaten at the little Anthony girl. Well, what’s a chicken sandwich? The difference is, I’m smart and all you meat eaters are dumb. Explain to me a better reason.
Gutenberg’s printing press:
If he wouldn’t have invented movable type printing, then we today would all still be living in the Middle Ages. You think that by now, we wouldn’t, but if you only give books to hundreds of people instead of millions of people, then the chances of individuals reckoning further about things like electricity would be near nothing. Books tell the needed prerequisites to allow the streamlining of progress. If thousands of times less people have the prerequisite books available, then there’s thousands of times less chance for those particular few to ponder further. Of course, there are lots of people today that want to limit the information on the Internet. Those happen to also be the ones who are still living in the 1950s. Hopefully enough good Internet information gets disseminated before the big suppression occurs. And, those same kinds were the only ones who had books before Gutenberg’s press (around 1450 AD). Humans are only animals with high communication stills. The human mind needs taught prerequisites to progress further.
Bruce Pardo, Christmas Eve bloodbath, Covina, CA:
Another great example caused by the marriage / monogamy standard. So, let’s thank the Pope for this one as well. Like the Mumbai attacks, 9/11, the Iraq debacle, World War II, World War III, etc.: put me at the helm, wait 100 years, and none of this kind of stuff will ever happen again; because, (1) we’ll be treating other countries “fair” (we don’t even know what “fair” really is today – can’t even think it), and (2) we’ll like others more, and family a bit less (we can’t even think how that’d be possible today). And, I’ll even fix everyone’s tax problem.
Of course, there’s not much distinguishment between the innocent people killed at the party versus the ex-wife. Nor am I reading about a distinguishment on the blogs. It’s murder regardless to everyone. The reason people can’t distinguish between the murder of the innocent versus the guilty is because no one has taught such a standard. People tell me my “never hurt an innocent person” is something everyone already knows but they don’t. The standard today has 99% to do with what our “trusted” authorities say. The Blagojevich case is a good example. – How many other cases of corruption does our government overlook? No, probably so many that they can’t enforce it all, because they’d have to throw just about everyone in jail, thereby allowing it to be massive. “One” religious leader can change it, no one else; and, I would have to be someone very well recognized to be able to overrule the predominate cop-out “Jesus paid your penalties.” And, as the predominate religious voice in this country being the Protestants, even all Catholics in this country have this major cop-out in the back of their minds; especially when it’s to their serious personal advantage.
Of course, we can think like Clinton, and both Bushes, that we had to kill many innocent civilians in Iraq and Yugoslavia to achieve sentence on the guilty. That would justify Pardo, right?
People have way too much respect for authority and way too less for intelligence. That’s because people don’t like thinking beyond the first-step.
Gaza bombings – when’s it gonna stop?:
If you don’t like the West Texas solution, try paying the rent. If I forced myself into an Overland Park apartment building since 1948, and never have paid any rent, even I would have quite a collection of eviction notices. Especially when I deliberately took over the occupancy of even more units in 1967. (More bodies to party with.) It’s just another great idea that would probably stop the violence and hatred, that no one is going to even consider. One would have to understand what the word “fair” means. I don’t know how it is in other countries, but in this country, we all only know what’s “fair” by whatever our iron hand authorities say it is. And, know nothing different … unless we end up the victim of that “fairness.” But, at least we have Freedom of Speech, where one only gets blacklisted, slandered and harassed by authorities, instead of jailed – unless you fall to one of their entrapments. So, my p’s and q’s must be pretty legal or I’d be in jail by now. So, the only way YOU are able to receive the correct truth and intelligence that would “really” fix things, is when someone like me is willing to take the risk. Otherwise, you’re only going to hear what’s “accepted” inside that box. Like, you know what your limitations are if you’re a popular newsperson. Jesus took the risk. I’m just proud I’m like Jesus. Of course, I know I’ll never be able to become an employee anywhere for the rest of my life, because it’s easy for authorities to talk to an employer. (The continuous harassments and entrapment attempts tell me they would. If not from the top, it’ll be from individuals doing “the right thing.”) I’ll just keep getting fired for some lame excuse, and just know in the back of my mind the real reason. But, it’s better than being crucified (so far). I mean (probably thanks to John McCain) with Russia still doing military exercises in the Gulf of Mexico, that proves that the end of the world is just another dumb self-pride, never admit a wrong, stone throw away; unless someone decides to disseminate my intelligence.
Then there are mentalities like the Pope, who says Israel and Palestine need to stop the violence and find a better way, but doesn’t suggest any other solution.
I-t w-o-u-l-d e-v-e-n s-a-t-i-s-f-y I-r-a-n. So we can all avoid WWIII. … Hey!
Israel would answer: Sorry, Mr. Critical, we’re going to keep the Jerusalem cop-out and not pay any “rent” for it, as such would make it look like we’re in the wrong; and instead, just kill innocent civilians whenever the need arises. You see, we have the Jerusalem cop-out to justify it.
I say, let’s not prove the atheists right by causing WWIII by having the Jerusalem cop-out (instead of the Goldenrule, only). … Unless we’re willing to pay the rent. After the end of mankind, it will be said throughout eternity, that the atheists were (basically) right, and O’Reilly and Hannity were (definitely) wrong.
Bush told Israel to “avoid civilian casualties.” Well, it looks like I’m getting somewhere when he uses the word “avoid.” That would have lessened my anger against the Soviet Union back in 1983 for killing my wife and kids, knowing their leader told his troops to “avoid” killing civilians. Or, maybe it wouldn’t lessen my anger at all, and I would have joined the American insurgency anyway. Regardless, when “I’m” the only “one” who knows the real definition of “fair”, then these problems will never end.
Plus, paying the rent at this point would be rewarding Palestinian attacks. Self-pride cop-outs in never admitting wrong, has 100% to do with the problem. Just blame me for not being around to comment back in 1947.
It’ll escalate. Iran will probably eventually “help” to try to stop it. Then that’ll be all she wrote.
Israel has assassinated enemy leaders in the past, and that is the only way to fight an evil enemy. However, when fairness is not on your side, then it will just make matters worse. For example, if you took the typical corrupt U.S. politician, and realistically threatened their life to stop their corruptions, then they would stop their corruptions. But, if you threatened their life for your right to take over and live in their house, without paying any rent (your “right to exist [there]”), then you’re going to find some major objection. If we bombed nuclear sites in Iran, we would find no honest Iranian stating the attack was “fair,” since we have nuclear weapons. Therefore, things would only get worse. Killing every person in Iran would be the only eventual solution for peace, as well as finding all others spread around the world, including all others in the world who respect “fairness.” Everyone in the entire world would have to be the typical American, constantly lying to themselves, “Thank you sir, may I have another,” type of person. If WWIII breaks out, then Fox News will surely be the blame, as their strong one-sided commentaries from people like Hannity, just add fuel to the fire of American’s who think everything America does militarily is just and fair. If you don’t really have “fairness” on your side to the base of your situation, then you can’t completely win without mass genocide. And, everyone over there knows that Israel was (within a generation) and still continues their unfair intrusions. And, mass genocide means mass genocide against all who order and participle in it, for each individual’s Afterlife; instead of moving to West Texas. Sure, they can bring up the Holy Land cop-out as justification to a Goldenrule ordering God. It’s like in Iraq today, we’re trying hard to set up some kind of fair government there (I assume), but since the original base of our invasion was unfair, there will surely continually be Iraqis who will oppose it. Everyone at Fox News says we want to forget about the original unfairness, but don’t realize certain Iraqis aren’t evil for simply remembering. I think the power of lying to yourselves is what’s going to end the world.
You’re all a bunch of idiots that need to “just” do as I say. You won’t think I’m crazy when Israel (the Holy Land cop-out) becomes the base cause for WWIII.
It looks like a bad infection to me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories, Palestinian territories:
I recommend an antibiotic.
Duh, I don’t really know:
Since you’re not going to move to West Texas or pay the rent, then I don’t know how to stop Hamas from firing rockets into Israel. I guess killing innocent civilians is the only way. But, logically, with every civilian death, you will have to suffer equally in your Afterlife. So, is it worth it? Heck no: You’d much rather move to West Texas then suffer the deaths and pains of all the innocents killed and hurt. The problem is, there’s no popular religion that tells of such an Afterlife fairness (except the 10 Commandments and some feller named Jesus). If there was, I’ll betcha then you’d all please the Pope and find another solution. I’m 100% sure about that. The Pope is probably praying for God to provide a solution. So, I hope he reads this email, then disseminates it.
Israel’s justification for having to kill Gaza civilians:
“It’s Hamas’s fault, because they shield themselves behind civilians.” But, would Israel bomb the site killing the civilians if it was their wife or daughter there being killed in the collateral damage? The correct answer is “no, they would not.” So, they’ll have no justification at all in the eyes of their accusers when they meet God; because, they wouldn’t even be justified even if they would kill their own loved ones to bomb the site. Especially, when the ignored-by-Americans base ethic of the matter is not on Israel’s side, and that they could move to West Texas, or pay rent. Even if we ignore the base ethic of the matter, where Hamas is “just” being aggressive for “no reason,” conveyed on shows like Fox News’ Huckabee, then they’re still not justified to kill innocents for that same above reasons.
Two kinds of people go the church:
Both kinds hear both the artificial salvation cop-outs and the things you’re not supposed to do (sin). Basically, if you’re (real) evil, you dwell on the artificial salvation cop-outs, so to justify your evil selfishness against others, thereby remain a church member. If you’re not evil, you dwell on the things you’re not supposed to do (sin), even though the cop-outs are available for the taking. The “sin” that was dwelled on the most (traditionally) was the sex outside of marriage sin, placing the good people as the victims of the sin. All in all, what I’m saying is that this is what has created the large atheist movement, that is today overwhelming this country. Can it be stopped? It entirely depends how quick my stuff gets disseminated. So, the ball is in everyone else’s court. Don’t even try to publicly attempt my reasoning without support of my website, as the church will drill you into the ground. You will just end up helping atheists’ views.
Hannity believes in demons:
He told that demons will deceive people by their “charm.” Apparently I’m not a demon.
Are we partying yet?:
The Tale of Despereaux (movie):
A very brave little mouse. The only thing braver is Israeli soldiers who blow up schools. That’ll make those Palestinians realize that the Jews deserve to live in the Holy Land, instead of West Texas. Well, they should at least by now realize that the Israelis need all the cop-outs they can get before they meet God.
Maybe if we Share the Love, then Sharing the Wealth might not be needed as much:
“A bunkhouse is all ya’ need if you’ve got love” –Country Joe and the Fish, Woodstock, 1969 (end of I-Feel-Like-I’m-Fixin’-To-Die Rag).
Mr. Critical – Kickin’ ass, with my boot.
TO SEE PRIOR TIMELESS WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/